Skip to main content
Cancer Medicine logoLink to Cancer Medicine
. 2019 Mar 18;8(5):2303–2312. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2065

SNP mutation‐related genes in breast cancer for monitoring and prognosis of patients: A study based on the TCGA database

Chundi Gao 1, Jing Zhuang 2,3, Chao Zhou 2,3, Huayao Li 1, Cun Liu 4, Lijuan Liu 2,3, Fubin Feng 2,3, Ruijuan Liu 2,3, Changgang Sun 2,3,
PMCID: PMC6537087  PMID: 30883028

Abstract

Advances in cancer biology have allowed early diagnosis and more comprehensive treatment of breast cancer (BC). However, it remains the most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide because of its strong invasiveness and metastasis. In‐depth study of the molecular pathogenesis of BC and of relevant prognostic markers would improve the quality of life and prognosis of patients. In this study, bioinformatics analysis of SNP‐related data from BC patients provided in the TCGA database revealed that six mutant genes (NCOR1, GATA3, CDH1, ATM, AKT1, and PTEN) were significantly associated with the corresponding expression levels of the proteins. The proteins were involved in multiple pathways related to the development of cancer, including the PI3K‐Akt signaling pathway, pertinent microRNAs, and the MAPK signaling pathway. In addition, overall survival and recurrence‐free survival analysis revealed the close associations of the expression of GATA3, NCOR1, CDH1, and ATM with survival of BC patients. Therefore, detecting these gene mutations and exploring their corresponding expression could be valuable in predicting the prognosis of patients. The results of the high‐throughput data mining provide important fundamental bioinformatics information and a relevant theoretical basis for further exploring the molecular pathogenesis of BC and assessing the prognosis of patients.

Keywords: bioinformatics analysis, biomarkers, breast cancer, prognosis, single nucleotide polymorphisms

1. INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers among women, and its morbidity and mortality have continued to increase worldwide in recent years, reflecting the strong invasiveness and metastasis characteristics of this cancer.1 BC is a complex disease that involves a sequence of genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic changes. Polymorphisms of genes involved in multiple biological pathways have been identified as potential risks of BC.2 These genetic polymorphisms further lead to differences in disease susceptibility and severity among individuals.3 The development of accurate molecular diagnoses and biological indicators of prognosis are crucial for individualized and precise treatment of BC patients.

Bioinformatics analysis based on high‐throughput sequencing is an important method to explore the molecular mechanisms of tumor pathogenesis, identify biomarkers that permit early diagnosis, and discover therapeutic targets. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are DNA sequence polymorphisms caused by a single nucleotide variation. SNPs are the most common type of human heritable variation and are common in the human genome. Gene SNPs can cause changes in gene expression by affecting the binding, cleavage, methylation, and mRNA degradation of gene transcription factors, causing genetic differences among individuals.4 SNPs are considered potential markers of carcinogenesis, and thus are valuable for early diagnosis and personalized targeted therapy for cancer. Even more profoundly, the detection of SNPs linked to cancer may lead to the reversal of the malignant transformation of cells if these SNPs can be corrected.

As a relatively small allelic variable, an SNP is an important genetic marker to study the characteristics of different cancers or cancers. As genome‐wide association studies have progressed, there is an increasing evidence that BC susceptibility is associated with genetic SNPs. For example, SNPs of ERCC5 have been associated with the development of certain cancers, including BC.5 Nari et al showed that the ERCC5 rs2094258 polymorphism might damage the DNA repair mechanism by causing defects in nucleotide excision repair, which is closely related to the risk of BC.6 In addition, Sun et al found that polymorphisms caused by genetic variation of microRNA (miR)‐124 rs531564 affect the prognosis of cancer patients.7 As SNPs associated with cancer risk may affect prognosis, analysis of relevant SNPs may help to identify new biomarkers for the prognosis of cancer.

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database can be applied to high‐throughput genomic analyses to better demonstrate the genetic basis of disease by using genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of gene mutations responsible for cancer. The findings could improve our ability to diagnose, treat, and prevent cancer. To further explore the biological significance of DNA sequence polymorphisms in the diagnosis and prognosis of BC, we downloaded data of BC‐related SNPs from the TCGA database and used bioinformatics analysis methods, including mutation data, protein‐protein interaction (PPI) network, and correlation analyses, to mine mutation genes related to BC diagnosis and prognosis. The goal was to provide a scientific theoretical basis for personalized precision medical treatment for BC.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Data processing and analysis

TCGA Data Portal was terminated, and all TCGA data were transferred to the newly established Genomic Data Commons (https://gdc.cancer.gov/).8 As the raw data on SNP in TCGA are not open to the public, we downloaded the SNP‐related data of BC that has been processed along and the raw mRNA expression data. The mRNA data were compiled from 1208 samples, including 112 normal samples and 1096 cancer samples. The mutated gene was obtained from the downloaded BC sample SNP data. The downloaded mRNA raw data were integrated and standardized using the Edger software package, and differences were analyzed to obtain differentially expressed genes and their expression level. The mRNA data provided by TCGA are public and open‐ended, and therefore does not require the approval of a local ethics committee.

2.2. Functional enrichment and pathway analysis of mutant genes

To better understand the dysfunction caused by these mutant genes, we used the DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/)9 database to perform agonistic gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Gene and Genome Encyclopedia (KEGG) enrichment analyses on genes with more than 15 mutant samples. As an open source platform, DAVID can be used to determine the association between target molecules. By selecting the GO term and the KEGG pathway and using P < 0.05 as the cutoff condition, screening of molecular functions (MFs), biological processes, cellular components (CCs), and KEGG pathways for mutated gene enrichment can be accomplished.

2.3. Construction of mutant gene PPI network and gene expression analysis

The construction of biological networks can be extended in the form of an actual system scale, and provides a visual representation of molecular interactions. We used the STRING online database10 to characterize the PPI network of the mutant genes and set the confidence score >0.4 as the cutoff criterion. We visualized the generated PPI network using Cytoscape software.11 To analyze the role of mutations in the development of BC, we explored the correlation between mutations and gene expression. In addition, the relationships between the site that were mutated in more than two samples and gene expression were further explored.

2.4. Mapping of Kaplan‐Meier survival curve of mutant genes and screening of prognostic biomarkers

The Kaplan‐Meier plot can evaluate the survival of breast, lung, stomach, and ovarian cancer patients using the gene expression data. Recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) data were downloaded from GEO (Affymetrix microarrays only), EGA, and TCGA. The primary purpose of the tool is a meta‐analysis‐based biomarker assessment.12 Using the Kaplan‐Meier plot, we evaluated the effects of mutant genes on the prognosis of BC patients, and finally screened for mutated genes that could be used as prognostic biomarkers for BC.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Data processing and analysis

The SNP data were derived from the germ cell/somatic cell mutation site data of BC samples extracted from the second generation sequencing data using the VarScan method in the TCGA database. The search identified 517 genes that were mutated in more than 15 samples. Of the 517 genes, 20 were mutated in 50 or more samples (Figure 1). 1208 BC‐related samples about the gene expression data were obtained from the TCGA database, including 112 normal tissue samples and 1096 cancer tissue samples. And differential genetic analysis between BC and normal tissue samples was performed based on the relevant LIMMA software package. Finally, 2138 differentially expressed genes were obtained with |log FC| > 2, P < 0.01 as the cutoff condition (Figure 2). The dysfunctions caused by abnormal mutations and expression disorders in normal and diseased patients were explored by further analysis of these mutated genes and differentially expressed genes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A waterfall map of 20 genes that mutated in more than 50 samples. (A)mutated gene, (B)tanslational effect, and (C)mutation type

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The volcano diagram about differentially expresses mRNAs. Red dots represent up‐regulated mRNA and green dots represent down‐regulated mRNA

3.2. Functional enrichment and path analysis of mutant genes

To further understand the functional role of mutant genes in BC, we used DAVID online software to perform functional enrichment analysis and pathway analysis of the 517 genes that were mutated in more than 15 samples. The abnormal mutations of genes related to BC were enriched in multiple pathways that affected MF and biological processes. Pathway analysis revealed the enrichment of SNP mutant genes in many signaling pathways in cancer, including the phosphoinositol‐3‐kinase (PI3K)‐Akt, calcium, and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways, among others (Figure 3). A functional analysis revealed that in the biological process (BP) group, SNP mutant genes were mainly enriched in regulation of transcription, including positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, and positive regulation of GTPase activity. In the MF group, these genes were mainly enriched in the binding of protein, calcium ion, and DNA. And in the CC group, these genes were particular in the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm (Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pathways enrichment map of 517 mutant genes. The top 20 terms with the lowest P value were selected. Count: the number of enriched genes in each term

Table 1.

Gene ontology analysis of 517 mutant genes in breast cancer

Category Term Count P value
GOTERM_BP_DIRECT Positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter 45 0.001617
  cell adhesion 38 1.04E‐08
  Negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter 32 0.0132158
  positive regulation of GTPase activity 28 0.0055662
  Positive regulation of transcription, DNA‐templated 27 0.0031846
  Negative regulation of transcription, DNA‐templated 25 0.0080431
  Protein phosphorylation 23 0.0104001
  Extracellular matrix organization 22 1.72E‐07
  Homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules 20 1.08E‐07
  Axon guidance 20 1.20E‐07
GOTERM_MF_DIRECT ATP binding 105 1.15E‐20
  Protein binding 263 0.0032137
  Calcium ion binding 61 2.12E‐15
  DNA binding 57 0.0413412
  Zinc ion binding 45 0.0120743
  Calmodulin binding 34 4.72E‐18
  ATPase activity 31 1.06E‐15
  Identical protein binding 31 0.0166445
  Actin binding 30 3.42E‐10
  Protein serine/threonine kinase activity 23 4.75E‐04
GOTERM_CC_DIRECT Cytoplasm 189 7.46E‐06
  Plasma membrane 158 2.82E‐06
  Cytosol 108 0.0361671
  Extracellular exosome 107 3.03E‐04
  Nucleoplasm 98 0.0066943
  Membrane 93 2.12E‐05
  Microtubule 32 6.15E‐10
  Cell junction 31 1.13E‐05
  Perinuclear region of cytoplasm 27 0.0221612
  Z disc 26 1.22E‐15

Top 10 terms were selected according to count and P value <0.05. Count: the number of enriched genes in each term.

3.3. Construction of mutant gene PPI network and correlation analysis of gene expression

To further investigate the potential links between these mutant genes, the STRING online database was used to mine and describe the interactions between mutant genes. The complex PPI network visualized using Cytoscape software contained 447 nodes and 2553 edges (Figure 4). The correlation analysis revealed correlations between the mutation and expression of six genes (NCOR1, GATA3, CDH1, ATM, AKT1, and PTEN). Among them, the expression levels of CDH1, NCOR1, ATM, and PTEN in the mutant samples were decreased, while the expression of GATA3 and AKT1 increased (Figure 5). In addition, further site analysis revealed that mutations in AKT1 rs121434592, CDH1 rs587783047, and GATA3 rs763236375 were significantly associated with corresponding gene expression (Figure 6). Limited by the sample size, the gene NCOR1, ATM, and PTEN mutation sites samples were too small, leading to the failure to find the mutation sites that affect gene expression, and further exploration is needed later.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The PPI network of the 517 mutant genes in breast cancer

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The relationship between mutation and expression about six genes

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The relationship between mutation sites and corresponding gene expression of AKT1, CDH1, and GATA3

3.4. Kaplan‐Meier survival curve analysis of mutant genes and screening of prognostic biomarkers

Based on Kaplan‐Meier plots, patients were divided into high expression group and low expression group according to the median expression value. The OS and RFS curves of the six expression‐related mutant genes were plotted. Using P < 0.05 as the significance level, the expression of four genes (NCOR1, GATA3, CDH1, and ATM) was found to be closely related to patients' OS and RFS. The OS and RFS curves revealed that high expression of NCOR1, ATM, and GATA3 was associated with higher OS and RFS, while high expression of CHD1 was associated with poor prognosis (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Kaplan‐Meier survival curves of the mutant genes. (A‐D) The OS curves of the mutant genes, (E‐H) The RFS curves of the mutant genes

4. DISCUSSION

BC is a complex disease that is the most common cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide. Detailed knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of BC, early detection of SNP mutations, and identification of prognostic markers affecting the development of disease is needed to improve the quality of life and prognosis of patients. Polymorphisms in many genes reportedly alter the risk of cancer and are considered potential markers of carcinogenesis. Polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)8 rs11225394 and MMP9 rs3787268 are closely related to BC risk in the Chinese Han population.13 The XPG (rs1047768 T > C) mutation may play an important role in the reduction of progression‐free survival and can be used as a predictor of poor prognosis in BC.14 Therefore, bioinformatics analysis of the prognosis of mutated genes and screening for specific SNP mutated genes can provide clinicians with new tools for treating patients and predicting prognosis.

In the present study, our aim was to screen and identify prognostic biomarkers associated with SNP‐mediated expression through a series of bioinformatics analyses of BC‐related data in TCGA database. To further study the related molecular mechanisms involved in the direct involvement of these mutant genes, functional enrichment and pathway analysis were performed. The genes were enriched in the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm, and were mainly involved in certain transcriptional regulation, such as negative or positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, positive regulation of transcription from DNA templates, and various binding pathways, such as protein and DNA binding. Pathway analysis indicated that BC mutated genes were mainly involved in the PI3K‐Akt and, calcium signaling pathways, and many other pathways related to cancer development. The functional enrichment and pathway analyses demonstrate the molecular mechanisms of SNP mutations in disease progression, and the functional level interaction of these genes.

Mutations in six genes (NCOR1, GATA3, CDH1, ATM, AKT1, and PTEN) were significantly correlated with the corresponding expression levels, and were enriched and involved in multiple cancer‐related pathways. GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) is a transcription factor crucial for mammary gland morphology and cell differentiation and acts as a tumor suppressor.15 Studies by Dydensborg et al have shown that overexpression of GATA3 could inhibit tumor growth and lung metastasis.16 Presently, GATA3 SNP mutations were identified in BC samples, and were positively correlated with expression levels, that is, the expression level of GATA3 was also increased in mutant samples. In addition, studies by Atlas et al have confirmed that the GATA3 gene is identified with mutations in >10% of all BC samples,17 further indicating that our results are feasible and accuracy. In addition, further analysis indicated that the SNP mutation in CACA at the GATA3 rs763236375 site was the important reason for affecting gene expression. The OS and RFS analysis indicates that high expression of this gene is beneficial to the prognosis of BC patients.

PI3K/AKT is an important signal transduction pathway in cells, which is significantly associated with malignant tumor metastasis.18 AKT is a direct target protein downstream of PI3K; increasing evidence supports the view that activation of AKT protein has an important biological role in cancer development.19 AKT1 is one of the subtypes of AKT. Activated AKT1 phosphorylates a large number of downstream substrates and is involved in the regulation of cell growth, metabolism, proliferation, apoptosis, and other processes. Castaneda et al found that AKT1 is closely related to the early development of BC22 and can be used as a key indicator for early diagnosis of BC. Pathway analysis revealed that AKT1 is enriched in the PI3K‐AKT signaling pathway and in several other pathways closely related to cancer, such as proteoglycans in cancer and the MAPK signaling pathway, indicating that the gene encoding AKT1 has important biological functions in the development of cancer. Moreover, our study also found that the important reason for the correlation between AKT1 gene SNP mutation and expression is the mutation of CC in AKT1 rs121434592 site. Furthermore, as a guardian of genomic integrity, the tumor suppressor gene PTEN plays an important role in maintaining chromosomal stability.23 PTEN is absent in most BC patients, especially triple‐negative BC. The loss of PTEN and phosphorylation activate AKT, and the activation regulates the PI3K/AKT pathway, which affects BC progression and patient prognosis.26

Nuclear receptor corepressor 1 (NCOR1) is a transcriptional co‐regulator that binds chromatin‐modifying enzymes to gene‐specific transcription factors and interacts with members of the BTB‐ZF transcription factor family to play important roles in T cell development and function. Low expression of NCOR1 is associated with acquired tamoxifen resistance in a mouse model of BC.29 Recent data have also shown that decreased NCOR1 expression is significantly associated with shorter RFS in BC patients, suggesting a poor prognosis30 that may be related to immune system involvement and enhanced drug resistance. In our study, the expression of the NCOR1 gene was significantly reduced in the mutated samples, and the results of the correlation analysis showed that the SNP mutation of NCOR1 was negatively correlated with the expression level. Moreover, the OS and RFS analysis data supported the poor prognosis associated with low expression of NCOR1, which is consistent with previous studies and further confirms the validity of the present findings.

E‐cadherin (CDH1) and Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) are tumor suppressor genes, which are enriched in multiple signaling pathways, including cancer pathways, miRNAs in cancer, apoptosis, and the p53 signaling pathway. CDH1 is frequently mutated in diffuse gastric cancer and lobular BC. Diffuse gastric cancer patients with CDH1 mutation have shorter survival time than those without the CDH1 mutation.33 In addition, mutations in ATM are closely associated with BC, ovarian cancer, and other cancers.34 ATM expression is down‐regulated in BC and suggests poor prognosis.35 Hypermethylation of the ATM gene promoter might affect the DNA repair mechanism by causing the dysregulation of the ATM/p53 signaling pathway, thereby affecting tumor progression in BC.36 In our study, the results of the correlation analysis showed that the SNP mutations of the genes encoding CDH1 and ATM were negatively correlated with the expression levels, with SNPs resulting in reduced expression. Among them, the main reason for the correlation between CDH1 SNP mutation and expression is the mutation of CC in CDH1 rs587783047 site. In addition, the OS and RFS analysis revealed that decreased expression of ATM detrimentally affects the prognosis of patients. Conversely, the increased expression of CDH1 detrimentally affects the prognosis of patients, which required further clinical investigation.

5. CONCLUSION

Bioinformatics analysis revealed that SNPs in six genes (NCOR1, GATA3, CDH1, ATM, AKT1, and PTEN) were significantly associated with the corresponding expression levels and were involved in multiple pathways involved in cancer development. In addition, further analysis indicated that the SNP mutation at the AKT1 rs121434592, CDH1 rs587783047, and GATA3 rs763236375 sites were the important reasons for affecting gene expression. In addition, OS and RFS analysis found that the expression of NCOR1, GATA3, CDH1, and ATM were closely related to the survival of BC patients. Therefore, detecting gene mutations and exploring their corresponding expression can be used to predict the prognosis of patients. The findings will require validation in large‐scale clinical studies to determine their accuracy and sensitivity in tumorigenesis and predicting patient outcomes. However, the focus of this study is to provide new ideas for clinical diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis through bioinformatics analysis. Our results provide an important bioinformatics basis and relevant theoretical basis for guiding follow‐up studies on BC.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Gao C, Zhuang J, Zhou C, et al. SNP mutation‐related genes in breast cancer for monitoring and prognosis of patients: A study based on the TCGA database. Cancer Med. 2019;8:2303–2312. 10.1002/cam4.2065

Chundi Gao made a significant contribution to this work and should be considered as the first author.

Funding information

This work is supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81673799) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81703915).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359‐386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Smith TR, Miller MS, Lohman KK, Case LD, Hu JJ. DNA damage and breast cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24(5):883‐889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Malins DC, Haimanot R. Major alterations in the nucleotide structure of DNA in cancer of the female breast. Cancer Res. 1991;51(19):5430‐5432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Shukla A, Alsarraj J, Hunter K. Understanding susceptibility to breast cancer metastasis: the genetic approach. Breast Cancer Manag. 2014;3(2):165‐172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ding DP, He XF, Zhang Y. Lack of association between XPG Asp1104His and XPF Arg415Gln polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta‐analysis of case‐control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;129(1):203‐209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Na N, Dun E, Ren L, Li G. Association between ERCC5 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(3):3192‐3197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sun Y, Duan F, Liu W, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the relationship between microRNA‐124 and the prognostic significance of cancer. Front Oncol. 2018;8:252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tomczak K, Czerwinska P, Wiznerowicz M. The cancer genome atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2015;19(1a):A68‐77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44‐57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S et al. STRING v10: protein‐protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D447‐D452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498‐2504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lanczky A, Nagy A, Bottai G, et al. miRpower: a web‐tool to validate survival‐associated miRNAs utilizing expression data from 2178 breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160(3):439‐446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang K, Zhou Y, Li G, et al. MMP8 and MMP9 gene polymorphisms were associated with breast cancer risk in a Chinese Han population. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Malik SS, Mubarik S, Masood N, Khadim MT. An insight into clinical outcome of XPG polymorphisms in breast cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2018;45(6):2369‐2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Garcia‐Closas M, Troester MA, Qi Y, et al. Common genetic variation in GATA‐binding protein 3 and differential susceptibility to breast cancer by estrogen receptor alpha tumor status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(11):2269‐2275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Dydensborg AB, Rose AA, Wilson BJ, et al. GATA3 inhibits breast cancer growth and pulmonary breast cancer metastasis. Oncogene. 2009;28(29):2634‐2642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Koboldt D, McLellan MD, Schmidt H, et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490(7418):61‐70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sheppard K, Kinross KM, Solomon B, Pearson RB, Phillips WA. Targeting PI3 kinase/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer. Crit Rev Oncog. 2012;17(1):69‐95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646‐674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Liu LZ, Zhou XD, Qian G, Shi X, Fang J, Jiang BH. AKT1 amplification regulates cisplatin resistance in human lung cancer cells through the mammalian target of rapamycin/p70S6K1 pathway. Cancer Res. 2007;67(13):6325‐6332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chen J, Shao P, Cao Q, et al. Genetic variations in a PTEN/AKT/mTOR axis and prostate cancer risk in a Chinese population. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e40817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Castaneda CA, Cortes‐Funes H, Gomez HL, Ciruelos EM. The phosphatidyl inositol 3‐kinase/AKT signaling pathway in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2010;29(4):751‐759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Shen WH, Balajee AS, Wang J, et al. Essential role for nuclear PTEN in maintaining chromosomal integrity. Cell. 2007;128(1):157‐170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Beg S, Siraj AK, Prabhakaran S, et al. Loss of PTEN expression is associated with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis in Middle Eastern triple‐negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):541‐553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Song CH, Park SY, Eom KY, et al. Potential prognostic value of heat‐shock protein 90 in the presence of phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase overexpression or loss of PTEN, in invasive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(2):R20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hollander MC, Blumenthal GM, Dennis PA. PTEN loss in the continuum of common cancers, rare syndromes and mouse models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(4):289‐301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Muller L, Hainberger D, Stolz V, Ellmeier W. NCOR1‐a new player on the field of T cell development. J Leukoc Biol. 2018;104(6):1061‐1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ellmeier W, Taniuchi I. The role of BTB‐zinc finger transcription factors during T cell development and in the regulation of T cell‐mediated immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;381:21‐49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lavinsky RM, Jepsen K, Heinzel T, et al. Diverse signaling pathways modulate nuclear receptor recruitment of N‐CoR and SMRT complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(6):2920‐2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Girault I, Lerebours F, Amarir S, et al. Expression analysis of estrogen receptor alpha coregulators in breast carcinoma: evidence that NCOR1 expression is predictive of the response to tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(4):1259‐1266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ciriello G, Gatza ML, Beck AH, et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of invasive lobular breast cancer. Cell. 2015;163(2):506‐519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hansford S, Kaurah P, Li‐Chang H, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome: CDH1 mutations and beyond. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(1):23‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. van der Post RS, Vogelaar IP, Manders P, et al. Accuracy of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer testing criteria and outcomes in patients with a germline mutation in CDH1. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(4):897‐906.e819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Forbes SA, Beare D, Gunasekaran P et al. COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D805–D811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Rondeau S, Vacher S, De Koning L, et al. ATM has a major role in the double‐strand break repair pathway dysregulation in sporadic breast carcinomas and is an independent prognostic marker at both mRNA and protein levels. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(6):1059–1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Begam N, Jamil K, Raju SG. Promoter hypermethylation of the ATM gene as a novel biomarker for breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(11):3003–3009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES