Abstract
Ducks, the reservoir host, are generally permissive to influenza A virus infection without disease symptoms. This natural ecology was upset by the emergence of H5N1 strains, which can kill ducks. To better understand host–virus interactions in the reservoir host, and influenza strain-specific molecular contributions to virulence, we infected White Pekin ducks with three similar H5N1 viruses, with known differences in pathogenicity and replication rate. We quantified viral replication and innate immune gene activation by qPCR, in lung and spleen tissues, isolated on each of the first 3 days of infection. The three viruses replicated well, as measured by accumulation of matrix gene transcript, and viral load declined over time in the spleen. The ducks produced rapid, but temporally limited, IFN and cytokine responses, peaking on the first day post-infection. IFN and proinflammatory cytokine gene induction were greater in response to infection with the more lethal viruses, compared to an attenuated strain. We conclude that a well-regulated IFN response, with the ability to overcome early viral immune inhibition, without hyperinflammation, contributes to the ability of ducks to survive H5N1 influenza replication in their airways, and yet clear systemic infection and limit disease.
Keywords: influenza A, H5N1, duck, interferon, inflammation, cytokine
Introduction
Influenza A viruses are ubiquitous pathogens that periodically cause widespread epidemics in humans and livestock, resulting in significant public health and economic burdens [1–4]. Ducks and other waterfowl are the natural hosts of most influenza virus types, with a long co-evolutionary history [5, 6]. Despite the existence of host tropism restrictions waterfowl can be a reservoir of aggressive epizootic strains like A/HK/156/1997 (H5N1) and A/Shanghai/patient 1/2013 (H7N9), both of which have caused occasional human infections with high mortality [7–9]. Historically, the majority of such strains, even those bearing the hallmark of highly pathogenic influenza – a multibasic cleavage site in the haemagglutinin (HA) protein – cause little disease in the ducks themselves, allowing them to act as the ‘Trojan horses’ of influenza [10–15]. However, certain highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 viruses isolated since 2002 are pathogenic and even lethal to ducks, and produce higher titres in the trachea than in the cloaca, which shows a preference for replication in the airways rather than the intestines [16–18]. These strains, which can harm ducks, represent a change in the natural host–pathogen relationship. The precise mechanisms of pathogenesis and resistance in the natural host are not entirely clear.
Pathogenicity of influenza viruses is associated with immune dysregulation and unusual tissue tropism. Hypercytokinemia, a ‘cytokine storm’ that results from over-activation of inflammatory immune signalling, can contribute to influenza pathology in humans, mice and chickens [19–24]. In side-by-side infections of chickens and ducks with two HPAI H5N1 viruses – A/Muscovy duck/Vietnam/453/2004 and A/duck/Indramayu/BBVW/109/2006 – Burggraaf and colleagues found that the inflammation responses differed dramatically between hosts [19]. Proinflammatory cytokines, like IL-6, were potently induced in the chickens, but only modestly in ducks, and only at later times in the infection period. The authors concluded that the controlled response in ducks contributed to apparent resistance and decreased mortality. Similar trends were also observed in chicken embryonic fibroblasts and duck embryonic fibroblasts infected with H5N1 virus [25]. On the other hand, Wei and colleagues found that infection of Muscovy ducks with the HPAI H5N1 virus A/duck/Guangdong/383/2008 greatly induced transcription of IL-6, IL-8 and IFN-gamma (IFNG) in brain tissue, along with apparently unchecked viral replication [26]. Their results suggest that hyperinflammation may also contribute to neurological symptoms and mortality in ducks.
To help clarify the mechanisms of virulence and resistance we performed experimental infections of mature Pekin ducks using three similar HPAI (H5N1) influenza strains with different reported levels of pathogenicity; A/duck/Thailand/D4AT/2004 (D4AT), a very virulent avian influenza virus, and A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (VN1203), which is an avian-origin virus isolated from a fatal human case [27, 28]. In an experimental infection of juvenile Pekin and mallard ducks both of these strains produced comparable titres in tracheal and cloacal swabs, but D4AT was more lethal than VN1203 in both directly infected and contact-infected animals [16]. In 4–6-week-old mallard ducks infected with 106-7 EID50 (50% egg infectious doses), D4AT killed all of the ducks by 6 days post-infection (p.i.), while VN1203 killed 50 % of the ducks at 5 days p.i., leaving survivors that shed the virus. D4AT was also 100 % lethal to experimentally infected Khaki Campbell ducks [28]. Interestingly, this is opposite to lethality in ferrets, where VN1203 is more lethal than D4AT [27]. The third virus strain we used is a reverse-genetics, recombinant version of VN1203 (rgVN1203) [29] that has 11 silent nucleotide substitutions and is attenuated in ducks compared to the original isolate [30]. It elicits clinical symptoms in ducks, but with a lower mortality rate than the original isolate VN1203 due to three amino acid substitutions (T51M, V56A, E87G) in the PB1-F2 gene, which decrease viral polymerase activity and replication efficiency in a minigenome assay [31]. The original isolate VN1203 killed 55 % of the ducks, compared to only 20 % for rgVN1203.
Here we examine transcription levels of IFN, IFN-stimulated genes (ISG), and proinflammatory cytokines in White Pekin ducks infected with these viruses via the ‘natural route’ – dripping into nares, eyes and trachea. We compare immune responses in lung and spleen tissue of the ducks over the course of 3 days p.i. Previously we reported that rgVN1203 infection induces a rapid induction of ISGs in duck lungs, which returns to the baseline by the third day p.i. [17], and we expected similar immune response profiles in this experiment. We anticipated that signatures of pathogenicity may be apparent for D4AT and VN1203, compared to rgVN1203, in proinflammatory cytokines and IFNs. We show that all three H5N1 strains induced rapid, transient IFN responses and moderate inflammation, which likely protected some ducks from manifestation of disease while permitting viral replication and shedding.
Results
Ducks upregulate RIG-I expression in response to H5N1 infections
We infected ducks by the natural route with two closely related H5N1 viruses that differed in known pathogenicity [16, 31], the original isolate of A/Vietnam/1203/04 (H5N1) (VN1203), or A/duck/Thailand/D4AT/04 (H5N1) (D4AT), and a recombinant version of A/Vietnam1203/2004 (H5N1) (rgVN1203). These viral strains differed in several key amino acid residues we predicted might affect innate immune responses (Table 1). Ducks were tested for infection by taking tracheal and cloacal swabs, and positive tracheal swabs were titrated further to reveal that viruses replicated to similar levels (Fig. 1a). To assess differences in viral replication in tissues, we quantified viral matrix gene copy numbers in the tissues of the animals, isolated on each of 3 days p.i. In lungs, matrix gene copy numbers remained relatively stable throughout the three-day period, and D4AT replicated most abundantly of the three viruses with the highest viral titre at 2 days p.i. (Fig. 1b). rgVN1203 had the lowest viral load in the lung, but this difference was statistically significant only for 2 days p.i. In spleen tissues, matrix copy numbers peaked at 1 day p.i., with D4AT remaining high at 2 and 3 days p.i. in some individuals (Fig. 1c). For all three viruses we see significant viral load in the lung and evidence of systemic spread to the spleen, with clearance over time.
Table 1. Known amino acid differences between the viral proteins of three influenza virus strains: recombinant A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) (rgVN1203), original isolate A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) (VN1203) and A/duck/Thailand/D4AT/2004 (H5N1) (D4AT).
The three amino acid differences between rgVN1203 and the original isolate are highlighted in bold.
| Protein | Amino acid position | rgVN1203 | VN1203 | D4AT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PB2 | 195 | D | D | N |
| 391 | Q | Q | E | |
| 627 | K | K | E | |
| PB1-F2 | 42 | Y | Y | C |
| 51 | M | T | M | |
| 56 | A | V | V | |
| 79 | R | R | Q | |
| 87 | G | E | E | |
| PA | 421 | I | I | S |
| HA | 52 | K | K | T |
| NP | 456 | V | V | A |
| NA | 5 | Q | Q | K |
| 19 | I | I | M | |
| 29 | M | M | L | |
| 45 | Q | Q | K | |
| 46 | S | S | A | |
| 264 | N | N | D | |
| NEP | 48 | T | T | A |
| 115 | A | A | T | |
| NS1 | 57 | A | A | S |
| 71 | G | G | E | |
| 73 | S | S | T | |
| 122 | T | T | V | |
| 200 | N | N | S | |
| 216–225 | del. | del. | KMARTIESEV |
Fig. 1.

H5N1 influenza A viruses replicated to high levels in infected ducks. (a) Tracheal virus titres in ducks infected with different H5N1 strains. Tracheal and cloacal swabs were collected at 1, 2 and 3 days p.i. and neat swab material was tested for the presence of influenza virus by egg inoculation, and positive tracheal samples were titrated further by calculating EID50. H5N1 replication in tissues was determined by amplification of the influenza A matrix 1 gene. RNA was extracted from lung (b) and spleen (c) tissues of ducks at 1, 2 and 3 days p.i. with rgVN1203, VN1203 or D4AT viruses. Influenza matrix gene copy number is determined against a known copy number of an influenza matrix M1 clone. Each dot represents one duck. Significant differences in mean viral titre each day were determined by two-way ANOVA (P<0.05). *P<0.05, ns not significant.
RIG-I is a key pattern recognition receptor of the IFN response in influenza-infected cells [32]. RIG-I induces IFN, and its own expression is, in turn, induced by IFN and cytokine signalling, in birds [33, 34], fish [35] and humans [36]. To compare the relative expression of the gene encoding RIG-I (DDX58) in different H5N1 infections, we examined its transcript abundance in the lung and spleen tissues of ducks either mock-treated, or infected with rgVN1203, VN1203 or D4AT, normalizing to the housekeeping gene GAPDH. The relative abundance of duck DDX58 transcripts in lung tissue is increased at 1 day p.i., the greatest induction following infection with D4AT (Fig. 2a). By 3 days p.i., the relative abundance is decreased. In spleen tissue, DDX58 upregulation peaks at 1 day p.i. (Fig. 2b). While the response to each virus follows a slightly different time course, RIG-I is highly upregulated in both the lung and spleen, peaking at 1 day p.i.
Fig. 2.
RIG-I is upregulated early in lung and spleen tissues of H5N1 influenza A-infected ducks. RNA was extracted from lung (a) and spleen (b) tissues of ducks at 1, 2 and 3 days p.i. with rgVN1203, VN1203 or D4AT viruses. DDX58 transcription was analysed by qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. Fold-induction compared to a mock-treated animal is shown (each dot represents one duck). Significant differences between the mean gene expression levels in tissues infected with different viruses were determined by two-way ANOVA (P<0.05), *P<0.05.
Ducks upregulate IFNs early in response to H5N1 infections
To examine the contribution of different IFNs, we examined their transcription levels in lung and spleen tissues of the ducks by qPCR (Fig. 3). Genes coding IFN alpha (IFNA), beta (IFNB), gamma (IFNG) and lambda (IFNL) were upregulated on the first day p.i., compared to mock-treated animals. IFNA transcript abundance in the lungs increased at 1 day p.i. with rgVN1203, and in one VN1203-infected animal, and not at all by D4AT (Fig. 4a). In spleen tissue at 1 day p.i. IFNA was highly induced by VN1203 and especially D4AT (Fig. 3b). IFNB, conversely, was more strongly upregulated in lung tissue than in spleen, in concordance with RIG-I expression. Lung IFNB transcripts were upregulated most by D4AT on the first day, and returned to the baseline by the third day (Fig. 3c). In rgVN1203-infected lungs IFNB was not upregulated on the first day, but increased at 2 days p.i., before returning to mock level by 3 days p.i. In the spleen, IFNB transcript abundance was highest at 1 day p.i. for all viruses, but induction was modest (Fig. 3d). IFNG transcription in lung tissue was upregulated most by D4AT at 1 day p.i., and returned to the baseline at 3 days p.i. (Fig. 3e). In spleen tissue, IFNG upregulation was more modest, and returned to the baseline by 2 days p.i. (Fig. 3f). IFNL was upregulated in both tissues, with D4AT eliciting the highest response in the lung (Fig. 3g) and spleen (Fig. 3h). Thus, all IFNs are induced by infections with highly pathogenic avian influenza, with D4AT eliciting the highest IFN response.
Fig. 3.
IFNs are upregulated in lung and spleen tissues of H5N1 influenza A-infected ducks at 1 day p.i. RNA was extracted from lung and spleen tissues of ducks at 1, 2 and 3 days p.i. with rgVN1203, VN1203 or D4AT viruses. IFN transcription was analysed by qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. Fold-induction compared to mock-infected animals is shown for genes encoding IFN-α in lung (a) and spleen (b); IFN-β in lung (c) and spleen (d); IFN-γ in lung (e) and spleen (f); IFN-λ in lung (g) and spleen (h). Each dot represents one duck. Significant differences between mean expression levels in tissues infected with different viruses were determined by two-way ANOVA (P<0.05). *P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001, ns not significant.
Fig. 4.
ISGs are upregulated early in lung and spleen tissues of H5N1 influenza A-infected ducks. RNA was extracted from lung and spleen tissues of ducks at 1, 2 and 3 days p.i. with rgVN1203, VN1203 or D4AT viruses. ISG transcription was analysed by qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. Fold-induction compared to mock-infected animals is shown for OASL in lung (a) and spleen (b); IFIT5 in lung (c) and spleen (d); MX1 in lung (e) and spleen (f). Each dot represents one duck. Significant differences between mean expression levels in tissues infected with different viruses were determined by two-way ANOVA (P<0.05), *P<0.05, ns not significant.
Ducks highly upregulate ISGs in response to H5N1 infections
To compare gene expression downstream of RIG-I and IFN induction we looked at the upregulation of three representative ISG transcripts in the lung and spleen tissues. OASL was most upregulated at 1 day p.i. by D4AT in the lung (Fig. 4a) and spleen (Fig. 4b). IFIT5 transcription upregulation was highest at 1 day p.i. in the lung (Fig. 4c) and spleen (Fig. 4d). MX1 transcripts were upregulated in lungs at 1 day p.i. (Fig. 4e), but were highly induced in spleen over all 3 days (Fig. 4f). All ducks showed a strong upregulation of three ISGs in the lung and spleen early in the immune response, which decreased over time, and showed individual variation in expression.
Ducks upregulate proinflammatory cytokines early in response to H5N1 infections
To assess the potential contribution of hypercytokinemia to H5N1 pathology in ducks we examined the transcription of three proinflammatory cytokine genes – IL1B, IL6 and IL-18 – and the anti-inflammatory cytokine gene IL10. IL-1β and IL-6 are key mediators of lung inflammation in severe influenza infections of humans and chickens [37, 38]. In our experimentally infected ducks there was a moderate upregulation of cytokines, but the response appears controlled and not sustained, with all transcript levels in both tissues returning to control levels by 3 days p.i. IL1B was only slightly induced in the lung (Fig. 5a) and spleen (Fig. 5b). In duck lungs IL6 was upregulated most by VN1203 (Fig. 5c). In spleen tissue, relative transcript abundance was increased similarly by all viruses on the first day p.i., and returned to control levels by 2 days p.i. in the spleen (Fig. 5d). IL18 was slightly upregulated at 2 days p.i. for rgVN1203 in the lung (Fig. 5e), but slightly induced by all viruses at 1 day p.i. in the spleen (Fig. 5f). IL10 induction was low in both tissues, peaking in the lungs at 1 day p.i. in VN1203-infected ducks (Fig. 5g), and peaking in the spleen at 1 day p.i. in response to D4AT (Fig. 5h). Thus, ducks make a proinflammatory cytokine response to H5N1 infections, with greater response to the lethal VN1203 and D4AT viruses, compared to the attenuated rgVN1203.
Fig. 5.
ILs are upregulated in lung and spleen tissues of H5N1 influenza A-infected ducks at 1 day p.i. RNA was extracted from lung and spleen tissues of ducks at 1, 2 and 3 days p.i. with rgVN1203, VN1203 or D4AT viruses. IL transcription was analysed by qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. Fold-induction compared to mock-infected animals is shown for IL1B in lung (a) and spleen (b); IL6 in lung (c) and spleen (d); IL18 in lung (e) and spleen (f) and IL10 in lung (g) and spleen (h). Each dot represents one duck. Significant differences between mean expression levels in tissues infected with different viruses were determined by two-way ANOVA (P<0.05). *P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ns not significant.
Discussion
We report that experimental infections of White Pekin ducks with three similar highly pathogenic H5N1 viruses produced rapid and robust IFN responses and inflammation, which peaked on the first day p.i. and were not sustained. Between the individual ducks there was a lot of variation, as expected. Viral load was initially high in both organs and remained stable in the lungs, but decreased over time in the spleen. Although the three viral strains are closely related, between them D4AT replicates most quickly and induces higher IFN responses, and conversely rgVN1203 replicates most slowly and elicits a lower magnitude response, as expected. Proinflammatory cytokine responses to infection with VN1203 and D4AT showed increased IL6 and IFNG gene expression, compared to the attenuated rgVN1203. Unexpectedly, the more lethal strain D4AT, elicited higher IFN responses and lower IL-6 than VN1203, suggesting dysregulated innate responses may contribute to the pathogenicity of these viruses in ducks. Alternatively, the pathogenicity of both VN1203 and D4AT in Pekin ducks is very high [16] and may be too close for comparison between them, or the kinetics of the innate responses were different.
RIG-I transcripts were upregulated in response to all three viruses starting on the first day p.i., and modest upregulation persisted through the third day. In the infected ducks, induction was highest in response to D4AT on the first day in the lungs. RIG-I upregulation suggested a productive IFN response, so we examined the transcription of type I, type II and type III IFNs in the ducks and saw that induction spiked sharply on the first day p.-i., and returned to the baseline by the third day, in both tissues. Type I IFN signalling controls inflammation and limits influenza virus-induced lung injury [39]. Consistent with RIG-I signalling leading to release of, primarily, IFN-β, we observed greater induction of IFNB transcription than IFNA. IFN-β knockout mice show decreased survival and higher influenza viral titres in the lung [40], and fibroblasts from RIG-I knockout mice fail to induce several downstream ISGs [41]. Thus, we predict that a rapid IFN response protects ducks from succumbing to disease. Expression of IFNB is delayed in lungs infected with rgVN1203, which peaks at 2 days p.i., potentially due to slower replication. Attenuation was shown to be due to amino acid differences between these strains in PB1-F2 [31], which is also known to antagonize IFN in mammals [42]. Surprisingly, the IFNB response was highest to D4AT, the virus known to cause the highest mortality in ducks. Of note, the influenza NS1 protein, the primary IFN antagonist of the virus [43], differs between the D4AT and VN1203 strains by five amino acid substitutions, and a ten amino acid C-terminal deletion in VN1203. The C-terminal ESEV motif, present in D4AT NS1, was initially thought to be important in IFN antagonism. However, VN1203 NS1 variants with truncated wild-type or ESEV termini equally inhibited an IFN-β promoter reporter in MDCK cells [44]. Our results are consistent with this, since D4AT, with the terminal ESEV, induced higher IFNB gene expression in duck lung and spleen tissues than VN1203. Alternatively, differences in internal genes between strains account for the different responses. A severe outcome in mice correlating with type I IFN and proinflammatory cytokine release in lungs, is due to increased viral replication in myeloid cells, and is determined by internal genes of avian H5N1 viruses [45]. One residue of D4AT known to contribute to slightly increased pathogenicity in ducks is PB2 627E [46].
IFNG was upregulated in the lung and spleen at 1 day p.i. with D4AT, and less for VN1203 or rgVN1203. We observed a 100-fold upregulation of IFNG transcripts at 1 day p.i. in response to D4AT. IFN-γ and other markers of a Th1 type immune response are seen in VN1203-infected chickens at 1 day p.i. [47]. IFNG transcripts were also increased in the brain and hearts of infected ducks at 3 days p.i., which has been implicated in neurological symptoms [19]. Muscovy ducks infected with H5N1 strains showed very high expression of IFNG transcripts in brain, and lung (increasing by 3 days p.i.), with increased expression correlating with virulence of the strains [26]. In our H5N1 infections of ducks, we observed that increased IFNG expression in the lung and spleen correlates with known pathogenicity of the strains.
ISG transcription was induced to very high levels at 1 day p.i., and declined gradually in all three viral infections. Upregulation of IFIT5 and of OASL was higher in the lungs than in the spleen, while MX1 induction was very moderate in the lungs and highly induced in the spleen. In humans, IFT5 binds and sequesters viral 5′-triphosphate RNA [48], and OASL enhances RIG-I activity [49, 50]. Mx1 is a key component of the antiviral response in mice [51], expressed in all mouse tissues stimulated with poly (I:C) or influenza, and is thought to be expressed by all vertebrate cell types [52, 53]. High Mx induction may explain the decrease of viral titre in spleens compared to lungs. However, the original in vitro investigation of two duck Mx alleles found that they conferred no resistance to lab strains of influenza, compared to mouse Mx [54]. However, a variety of alleles exist in wild ducks [55], and resistance to influenza is allele and strain-dependent in other species. Thus, duck Mx function remains an open question.
The cytokine response in the infected ducks appeared relatively controlled. Hypercytokinemia, or ‘cytokine storm’, can contribute to H5N1 influenza pathology [56] in humans [20–24], mice [57, 58] and chickens [19]. In VN1203- and D4AT-infected ducks, transcripts for proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 were upregulated only on the first day p.-i., and upregulation of IL-1β was very modest. IL6 transcript induction was highest in response to VN1203, and lowest to the attenuated rgVN1203. Our results differ from previous work showing rapid over-induction of proinflammatory cytokines in chickens, but not ducks, in response to infection with two H5N1 strains, one potentially lethal to ducks (A/Muscovy duck/Vietnam/453/2004) and one which did not kill ducks (A/Duck/Indramayu/BBVW/109/2006) [19]. Proinflammatory cytokines were not induced at 1 day p.i. in ducks infected with VT453 and IND109, instead peaking at 3 days p.i. for VT453. Viral strain, replication kinetics and host genetics may all contribute to the different responses observed. While dysregulated proinflammatory responses were expected to be a hallmark of the lethal strains, similar to proinflammatory gene induction increasing each day in lung tissue in DK383 H5N1-infected Muscovy ducks [26], this was not seen within the 3 days p.-i. examined. Thus, we believe the immune responses seen are protective, contributing to survival, at least within the timeframe examined.
Methods
Viruses
Two closely related H5N1 viruses were used in this study A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) (VN1203); A/duck/Thailand/D4AT/2004 (H5N1) (D4AT); and a recombinant version of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) (rgVN1203), which was made by reverse genetics [29]. Previously, the intravenous pathogenicity indexes (IVPI) for D4AT and VN1203 in mallards were determined to be 2.87 and 2.32, respectively [16]. The IVPI for VN1203 was higher (2.85) in domestic Pekin ducks [16]. A comparison of pathogenicity index following inoculation by the natural route yielded 1.24 for wtVN1203 and 0.58 for rgVN1203 [31]. Phylogenetic trees based on HA sequence place both D4AT and VN1203 in clade 1 [59, 60] and other genes are also closely related [61]. Amino acid sequence information to generate Table 1 is derived from GenBank accession numbers: A/VietNam/1203/2004 (H5N1) – PB2 (HM006756.1); PB1 (HM006757.1); PA (HM006758.1); HA (HM006759.1); NP (HM006760.1); NA (HM006761.1); M (HM006762.1); NS (HM006763.1). D4AT with original strain name A/Dk/Thailand/71.1/2004 (H5N1) - PB2 (AY651716.1); PB1 (AY651662.1); PA (AY651608.1); HA (AY651331.1); NP (AY651496.1); NA (AY651443.1); M (AY651385.1); NS (AY651551.1). rgVN1203 sequence differences were previously reported [31].
Duck infections, swab titrations
Outbred 6-week-old White Pekin ducks purchased from Metzer Farms were infected with 106 EID50 of VN1203, rgVN1203 or D4AT by dripping virus into nares, eyes and trachea, or mock-treated with PBS-only. Tracheal and cloacal swabs were taken from ducks prior to sacrifice and stored until titration in swab freezing media, made as described previously [62]. Ducks were confirmed infected by egg inoculations of neat swab material, and positive tracheal swabs were titred by determining their EID50 by the method of Reed and Muench [63]. Briefly, 10-fold dilutions were injected in three eggs, incubated for 2 days and allantoic fluid tested for HA activity [64]. The titre is the inverse of the dilution at which 50 % of the eggs were infected, and is calculated from the number of positive eggs at each dilution. Most cloacal swabs were negative, but a few undiluted cloacal swabs tested positive (3/8 for VN1203, 1/8 rgVN1203, and 3/8 D4AT), but not all eggs were positive, so they were not titred further. All tracheal swabs were titred in eggs. Ducks were euthanized and lung and spleen samples were harvested 1, 2 or 3 days p.i.
All virus strains caused noticeable disease signs, including cloudy eyes, loss of appetite and reduced mobility, but no neurological symptoms were observed, and no ducks succumbed to death within the 3 days. Weight differences were expected to be small and were not measured in this study. Previously, wtVN1203-infected ducks showed no weight gain, while rgVN1203 continued to gain weight, but weights were not significantly different before day 4 [31]. All animal experiments in this study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and performed in compliance with relevant institutional policies, National Institutes of Health regulations, and the Animal Welfare Act.
Quantification of gene expression by qPCR amplification
Total RNA was extracted from weighed tissues by immediate homogenization in TRIzol (1 ml per 200 mg tissue) and RNA extracted according to their protocol (Invitrogen) and precipitated. Resuspended RNA was quantified by NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific), and stored at −80 °C until use. An aliquot was treated with DNase I and used for the generation of cDNA. First strand cDNA synthesis was performed using OligodT and Superscript III in the presence of RNaseOUT Recombinant RNAse Inhibitor (Invitrogen).
To evaluate transcript abundance of DDX58, type I-III IFNs, ISGs: MX1, IFIT5, OASL and cytokines: IL6, IL1B, IL10, IL18 in influenza-infected tissues, we used qPCR with the 7500 Fast Real Time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems) and the FastStart TaqMan Probe Master mix (Roche). Primers and probe sets (Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT)) were designed using an online IDT Tool and validated using GAPDH as a control (Table S1, available in the online version of this article). Quantitative PCR amplifications were done using cDNA for mock-treated or influenza-infected lung and spleen tissues. PCR conditions were 95 °C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s followed by annealing-extension at 60 °C for 1 min. All samples were run in triplicate, each assay was repeated at least twice. Expression levels of the target genes were normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH using the relative quantitation method (ΔΔCT), and the analysis was done using the 7500 Fast system software version 1.4 (Applied Biosystems). Absolute quantification of the influenza matrix 1 (M1) gene was accomplished with qPCR, by comparing sample cDNA dilution series to a standard curve of an M1 clone in the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega).
Statistical analyses
Analysis of variance was done using a two-way ANOVA, with a post hoc Tukey multiple comparisons test, comparing the mean value of each group to every other group. While infected samples at 1 day p.i. were always significantly different from mock-treated samples, and different from samples at other days, these differences are obvious and bars indicating significance were omitted for clarity. Statistically significant differences between infections at each timepoint are indicated where present.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
This work was supported by CIHR grant MOP 125865 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to KEM. This work was funded in part by Contract No. HHSN272201400006C from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC). LBS was supported in part by an NSERC USRA scholarship and DE was supported in part by a QEII Graduate Scholarship. SM was supported as visiting scholar by the China Scholarship Council.
Acknowledgements
We thank Patrick Seiler and Jerry Aldridge for help with animal handling in BSL3, in the laboratory of Dr Robert Webster.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
One supplementary table is available with the online version of this article.
Abbreviations: EID50, 50% egg infectious doses; HA, haemagglutinin; IFIT5, IFN-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats; IVPI, intravenous pathogenicity index; M, matrix protein; NA, neuraminidase; NEP, nuclear export protein; NP, nucleoprotein; NS, nonstructural protein; OASL, 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetase-like protein; PA, polymerase A; PB1, polymerase B1; PB2, polymerase B2; RIG-I, retinoic acid inducible gene-I.
References
- 1.Molinari NA, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Messonnier ML, Thompson WW, Wortley PM, et al. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine. 2007;25:5086–5096. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rajao DS, Anderson TK, Gauger PC, Vincent AL. Pathogenesis and vaccination of influenza A virus in swine. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;385:307–326. doi: 10.1007/82_2014_391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Klepser ME. Socioeconomic impact of seasonal (epidemic) influenza and the role of over-the-counter medicines. Drugs. 2014;74:1467–1479. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0245-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Preaud E, Durand L, Macabeo B, Farkas N, Sloesen B, et al. Annual public health and economic benefits of seasonal influenza vaccination: a European estimate. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:813. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Taubenberger JK, Kash JC. Influenza virus evolution, host adaptation, and pandemic formation. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7:440–451. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56:152–179. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.1.152-179.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guan Y, Shortridge KF, Krauss S, Webster RG. Molecular characterization of H9N2 influenza viruses: were they the donors of the "internal" genes of H5N1 viruses in Hong Kong? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:9363–9367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kageyama T, Fujisaki S, Takashita E, Xu H, Yamada S, et al. Genetic analysis of novel avian A(H7N9) influenza viruses isolated from patients in China, February to April 2013. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:20453. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu D, Shi W, Shi Y, Wang D, Xiao H, et al. Origin and diversity of novel avian influenza A H7N9 viruses causing human infection: phylogenetic, structural, and coalescent analyses. Lancet. 2013;381:1926–1932. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60938-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alexander DJ, Parsons G, Manvell RJ. Experimental assessment of the pathogenicity of eight avian influenza A viruses of H5 subtype for chickens, turkeys, ducks and quail. Avian Pathol. 1986;15:647–662. doi: 10.1080/03079458608436328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cooley AJ, van Campen H, Philpott MS, Easterday BC, Hinshaw VS. Pathological lesions in the lungs of ducks infected with influenza A viruses. Vet Pathol. 1989;26:1–5. doi: 10.1177/030098588902600101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laudert EA, Sivanandan V, Halvorson DA. Effect of intravenous inoculation of avian influenza virus on reproduction and growth in mallard ducks. J Wildl Dis. 1993;29:523–526. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-29.4.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shortridge KF, Zhou NN, Guan Y, Gao P, Ito T, et al. Characterization of avian H5N1 influenza viruses from poultry in Hong Kong. Virology. 1998;252:331–342. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim JK, Negovetich NJ, Forrest HL, Webster RG. Ducks: the "Trojan horses" of H5N1 influenza. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009;3:121–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00084.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kida H, Yanagawa R, Matsuoka Y. Duck influenza lacking evidence of disease signs and immune response. Infect Immun. 1980;30:547–553. doi: 10.1128/iai.30.2.547-553.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sturm-Ramirez KM, Hulse-Post DJ, Govorkova EA, Humberd J, Seiler P, et al. Are ducks contributing to the endemicity of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in Asia? J Virol. 2005;79:11269–11279. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.17.11269-11279.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vanderven HA, Petkau K, Ryan-Jean KE, Aldridge JR, Webster RG, et al. Avian influenza rapidly induces antiviral genes in duck lung and intestine. Mol Immunol. 2012;51:316–324. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.03.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Costa-Hurtado M, Shepherd E, Dejesus E, Smith D, et al. Pathogenicity and transmission of H5 and H7 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in mallards. J Virol. 2016;90:9967–9982. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01165-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burggraaf S, Karpala AJ, Bingham J, Lowther S, Selleck P, et al. H5N1 infection causes rapid mortality and high cytokine levels in chickens compared to ducks. Virus Res. 2014;185:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Teijaro JR, Walsh KB, Rice S, Rosen H, Oldstone MB. Mapping the innate signaling cascade essential for cytokine storm during influenza virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:3799–3804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400593111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Teijaro JR, Walsh KB, Cahalan S, Fremgen DM, Roberts E, et al. Endothelial cells are central orchestrators of cytokine amplification during influenza virus infection. Cell. 2011;146:980–991. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yuen KY, Wong SS. Human infection by avian influenza A H5N1. Hong Kong Med J. 2005;11:189–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Peiris JS, Yu WC, Leung CW, Cheung CY, Ng WF, et al. Re-emergence of fatal human influenza A subtype H5N1 disease. Lancet. 2004;363:617–619. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15595-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cheung CY, Poon LL, Lau AS, Luk W, Lau YL, et al. Induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human macrophages by influenza A (H5N1) viruses: a mechanism for the unusual severity of human disease? Lancet. 2002;360:1831–1837. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11772-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liang QL, Luo J, Zhou K, Dong JX, He HX. Immune-related gene expression in response to H5N1 avian influenza virus infection in chicken and duck embryonic fibroblasts. Mol Immunol. 2011;48:924–930. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wei L, Jiao P, Song Y, Cao L, Yuan R, et al. Host immune responses of ducks infected with H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of different pathogenicities. Vet Microbiol. 2013;166:386–393. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Govorkova EA, Rehg JE, Krauss S, Yen HL, Guan Y, et al. Lethality to ferrets of H5N1 influenza viruses isolated from humans and poultry in 2004. J Virol. 2005;79:2191–2198. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.4.2191-2198.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Songserm T, Jam-On R, Sae-Heng N, Meemak N, Hulse-Post DJ, et al. Domestic ducks and H5N1 influenza epidemic, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:575–581. doi: 10.3201/eid1204.051614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Salomon R, Franks J, Govorkova EA, Ilyushina NA, Yen HL, et al. The polymerase complex genes contribute to the high virulence of the human H5N1 influenza virus isolate A/Vietnam/1203/04. J Exp Med. 2006;203:689–697. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hulse-Post DJ, Franks J, Boyd K, Salomon R, Hoffmann E, et al. Molecular changes in the polymerase genes (PA and PB1) associated with high pathogenicity of H5N1 influenza virus in mallard ducks. J Virol. 2007;81:8515–8524. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00435-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marjuki H, Scholtissek C, Franks J, Negovetich NJ, Aldridge JR, et al. Three amino acid changes in PB1-F2 of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus affect pathogenicity in mallard ducks. Arch Virol. 2010;155:925–934. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0666-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weber-Gerlach M, Weber F. Standing on three legs: antiviral activities of RIG-I against influenza viruses. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;42:71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2016.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Barber MR, Aldridge JR, Webster RG, Magor KE. Association of RIG-I with innate immunity of ducks to influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:5913–5918. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001755107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cagle C, To TL, Nguyen T, Wasilenko J, Adams SC, et al. Pekin and Muscovy ducks respond differently to vaccination with a H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) commercial inactivated vaccine. Vaccine. 2011;29:6549–6557. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen SN, Zou PF, Nie P. Retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs) in fish: current knowledge and future perspectives. Immunology. 2017;151:16–25. doi: 10.1111/imm.12714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yoneyama M, Kikuchi M, Natsukawa T, Shinobu N, Imaizumi T, et al. The RNA helicase RIG-I has an essential function in double-stranded RNA-induced innate antiviral responses. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:730–737. doi: 10.1038/ni1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim KS, Jung H, Shin IK, Choi BR, Kim DH. Induction of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) is a critical component of lung inflammation during influenza A (H1N1) virus infection. J Med Virol. 2015;87:1104–1112. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kuribayashi S, Sakoda Y, Kawasaki T, Tanaka T, Yamamoto N, et al. Excessive cytokine response to rapid proliferation of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses leads to fatal systemic capillary leakage in chickens. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Arimori Y, Nakamura R, Yamada H, Shibata K, Maeda N, et al. Type I interferon limits influenza virus-induced acute lung injury by regulation of excessive inflammation in mice. Antiviral Res. 2013;99:230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koerner I, Kochs G, Kalinke U, Weiss S, Staeheli P. Protective role of beta interferon in host defense against influenza A virus. J Virol. 2007;81:2025–2030. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01718-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Loo YM, Fornek J, Crochet N, Bajwa G, Perwitasari O, et al. Distinct RIG-I and MDA5 signaling by RNA viruses in innate immunity. J Virol. 2008;82:335–345. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01080-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Varga ZT, Ramos I, Hai R, Schmolke M, García-Sastre A, et al. The influenza virus protein PB1-F2 inhibits the induction of type I interferon at the level of the MAVS adaptor protein. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002067. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hale BG, Randall RE, Ortín J, Jackson D. The multifunctional NS1 protein of influenza A viruses. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:2359–2376. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/004606-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zielecki F, Semmler I, Kalthoff D, Voss D, Mauel S, et al. Virulence determinants of avian H5N1 influenza A virus in mammalian and avian hosts: role of the C-terminal ESEV motif in the viral NS1 protein. J Virol. 2010;84:10708–10718. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00610-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li H, Bradley KC, Long JS, Frise R, Ashcroft JW, et al. Internal genes of a highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus determine high viral replication in myeloid cells and severe outcome of infection in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006821. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schat KA, Bingham J, Butler JM, Chen LM, Lowther S, et al. Role of position 627 of PB2 and the multibasic cleavage site of the hemagglutinin in the virulence of H5N1 avian influenza virus in chickens and ducks. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Karpala AJ, Bingham J, Schat KA, Chen LM, Donis RO, et al. Highly pathogenic (H5N1) avian influenza induces an inflammatory T helper type 1 cytokine response in the chicken. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31:393–400. doi: 10.1089/jir.2010.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Abbas YM, Pichlmair A, Górna MW, Superti-Furga G, Nagar B. Structural basis for viral 5'-PPP-RNA recognition by human IFIT proteins. Nature. 2013;494:60–64. doi: 10.1038/nature11783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhu J, Ghosh A, Sarkar SN. OASL-a new player in controlling antiviral innate immunity. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;12:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2015.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhu J, Zhang Y, Ghosh A, Cuevas RA, Forero A, et al. Antiviral activity of human OASL protein is mediated by enhancing signaling of the RIG-I RNA sensor. Immunity. 2014;40:936–948. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tumpey TM, Szretter KJ, van Hoeven N, Katz JM, Kochs G, et al. The Mx1 gene protects mice against the pandemic 1918 and highly lethal human H5N1 influenza viruses. J Virol. 2007;81:10818–10821. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01116-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Horisberger MA, de Staritzky K. Expression and stability of the Mx protein in different tissues of mice, in response to interferon inducers or to influenza virus infection. J Interferon Res. 1989;9:583–590. doi: 10.1089/jir.1989.9.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Staeheli P, Pitossi F, Pavlovic J. Mx proteins: GTPases with antiviral activity. Trends Cell Biol. 1993;3:268–272. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bazzigher L, Schwarz A, Staeheli P. No enhanced influenza virus resistance of murine and avian cells expressing cloned duck Mx protein. Virology. 1993;195:100–112. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dillon D, Runstadler J. Mx gene diversity and influenza association among five wild dabbling duck species (Anas spp.) in Alaska. Infect Genet Evol. 2010;10:1085–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Guo XJ, Thomas PG. New fronts emerge in the influenza cytokine storm. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39:541–550. doi: 10.1007/s00281-017-0636-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hatta M, Gao P, Halfmann P, Kawaoka Y. Molecular basis for high virulence of Hong Kong H5N1 influenza A viruses. Science. 2001;293:1840–1842. doi: 10.1126/science.1062882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tundup S, Kandasamy M, Perez JT, Mena N, Steel J, et al. Endothelial cell tropism is a determinant of H5N1 pathogenesis in mammalian species. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006270. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Uchida Y, Chaichoune K, Wiriyarat W, Watanabe C, Hayashi T, et al. Molecular epidemiological analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 subtype isolated from poultry and wild bird in Thailand. Virus Res. 2008;138:70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lipatov AS, Kwon YK, Sarmento LV, Lager KM, Spackman E, et al. Domestic pigs have low susceptibility to H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000102. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pfeiffer J, Pantin-Jackwood M, To TL, Nguyen T, Suarez DL. Phylogenetic and biological characterization of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses (Vietnam 2005) in chickens and ducks. Virus Res. 2009;142:108–120. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2009.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sturm-Ramirez KM, Ellis T, Bousfield B, Bissett L, Dyrting K, et al. Reemerging H5N1 influenza viruses in Hong Kong in 2002 are highly pathogenic to ducks. J Virol. 2004;78:4892–4901. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.9.4892-4901.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Reed LD, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg. 1938;27:493–497. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hirst GK. The quantitative determination of influenza virus and antibodies by means of red cell agglutination. J Exp Med. 1942;75:49–64. doi: 10.1084/jem.75.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




