Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2019 May 15;13(5):e0007397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007397

Interplay between proinflammatory cytokines, miRNA, and tissue lesions in Anisakis-infected Sprague-Dawley rats

Jerko Hrabar 1,*, Željka Trumbić 2, Ivana Bočina 3, Ivana Bušelić 1, Anamarija Vrbatović 1, Ivona Mladineo 1
Editor: Walderez O Dutra4
PMCID: PMC6538193  PMID: 31091271

Abstract

Background

Anisakiasis is an emerging public health problem, caused by Anisakis spp. nematode larvae. Anisakiasis presents as variable and unspecific gastrointestinal and/or allergic clinical symptoms, which accounts for the high rate of misdiagnosed cases.

Methodology/Principal findings

The aim of this study was to characterize the early cellular (6–72 h p.i.) and molecular (6 h p.i.) immune response and general underlying regulatory mechanism in Anisakis infected rats. Each Sprague-Dawley rat was infected with 10 Anisakis spp. larvae by gastric intubation. Tissues with visible lesions were processed for: i) classic histopathology (HE), immunofluorescence (CD3, iNOS, S100A8/A9), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM); ii) target genes (Il1b, Il6, Il18, Ccl3, Icam1, Mmp9) and microRNA (Rat Immunopathology MIRN-104ZF plate, Quiagen) expression analysis; and iii) global DNA methylation. Histopathology revealed that Anisakis larval migration caused moderate to extensive hemorrhages in submucosal and epimysial/perimysial connective tissue. In stomach and muscle, moderate to abundant mixed inflammatory infiltrate was present, dominated by neutrophils and macrophages, while only mild infiltration was seen in intestine. Lesions were characterized by the presence of CD3+, iNOS+, and S100A8/A9+ cells. The greatest number of iNOS+ and S100A8/A9+ cells was seen in muscle. Il6, Il1b, and Ccl3 showed particularly strong expression in stomach and visceral adipose tissues, but the order of expression differed between tissues. In total, three miRNAs were differentially expressed, two in stomach (miRNA-451 and miRNA-223) and two in intestine (miRNA-451 and miRNA-672). No changes in global DNA methylation were observed in infected tissues relative to controls.

Conclusions/Significance

Anisakis infection induces strong immune responses in infected rats with marked induction of specific proinflammatory cytokines and miRNA expression. Deciphering the functional role of these cytokines and miRNAs will help in understanding the anisakiasis pathology and controversies surrounding Anisakis infection in humans.

Author summary

Anisakiasis is a zoonotic disease (infection transmitted between animals and humans) contracted by consumption of raw or undercooked seafood contaminated with Anisakis spp. nematode larvae. Anisakiasis usually presents with variable and unspecific gastrointestinal and/or allergic symptoms, which accounts for the high rate of misdiagnosed cases. Due to changes in dietary habits, such as eating raw or undercooked seafood, anisakiasis is considered an emerging public health problem. Despite the increase in number of reported cases worldwide, mechanisms of immune response to this unspecific human pathogen are poorly known. We have shown that in experimentally infected rats, Anisakis larvae cause severe hemorrhages and necrotic changes of affected tissues in the early phase of infections. Neutrophils and macrophages were abundantly present in tissue lesions, while eosinophils, hallmark of helminth infections, were scarcely present. We have also demonstrated particularly strong expression of several inflammatory genes. Moreover, we give for the first-time insight into putative regulatory mechanism mediated via a distinct class of RNA molecules. Our study may provide new opportunities for better understanding of cellular and molecular response to Anisakis spp., aiming at development of more specific therapeutics and alleviation of pathologies associated with Anisakis spp. infection.

Introduction

Foodborne parasitic diseases have received increasing attention in recent decades. Some are considered emerging public health issues, due to changes in various factors influencing the propagation of parasites that cause them [1]. This is especially valid for several helminthiases, which have seen a rise in reported cases outside the natural range of their causative agents, mostly due to changes in dietary habits, such as eating raw or undercooked food, and increased demand and availability of “exotic” food [1,2]. The Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG) published a list of parasites that could be transmitted to humans by food. The list includes several helminth taxa considered to present substantial disease burden, such as Fasciola spp., Trichinella spp., Echinococcus spp., Clonorchis spp., Opistorchis spp., Taenia solium, Anisakis simplex, and Ascaris lumbricoides [3]. Although A. simplex was subsequently removed from the priority list as being an uncommon foodborne parasite [4], the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has listed anisakid nematodes as parasites of high public health importance [5]. In addition, a recent study ranked Anisakidae within the top 10 and top 5 foodborne parasites important in Northern and South-Western Europe regions, respectively [6]. This is also evidenced from the recently published analysis of a 10-year hospital discharge records that reported 370 confirmed cases of anisakiasis in Italy, with an annual incidence of 1.5 to 15.5 per 100000 hospitalizations [7]. Conversely, only 37 cases of anisakiasis were estimated over a 5-year period in France based on national survey among hospital Parasitology laboratories in France[8]. However, a recent risk assessment analysis indicated a substantial underestimation of Anisakis infection in European countries, predicting 7700–8320 annual cases for Spain only [9].

Members of the genus Anisakis, (with currently nine valid species) are parasitic nematodes with an indirect life cycle that utilize marine mammals, primarily cetaceans, as definitive hosts, planktonic crustaceans as first intermediate hosts, and fish and cephalopods as paratenic hosts [10]. In definitive hosts, these parasites induce chronic changes in the gastrointestinal mucosa ranging from superficial erosions to deep ulcerations. Histopathologically, lesions are characterized by lymphoplasmacytic gastritis, granulomatous or eosinophilic inflammation with the presence of multinucleated giant cells, hemosiderosis, and fibrosis [1114]. Following ingestion of raw or undercooked seafood infected with live Anisakis third-stage larvae (L3), humans can become accidental hosts; thus contracting a disease termed anisakiasis [2,15]. In humans, Anisakis larvae cannot reach adult stage, and although infection can be asymptomatic, it is often followed by an acute clinical state. A recent classification lists four types of disease: gastric, intestinal, ectopic (extragastrointestinal), and allergic (gastro-allergic) anisakiasis [1618]. Gastric anisakiasis is characterized by redness and swelling at the site of larval migration, hemorrhages, erosive gastritis, and mucosal ulceration with mixed inflammatory infiltrate dominated by eosinophilic granulocytes [17]. Intestinal anisakiasis is characterized by mucosal edema and luminal stenosis; rarely intestinal obstruction and intussusception occur [17,19]. Chronic infection can result in formation of abscesses, ulcers, and eosinophilic granulomas forming around dying larva [17,20]. Such histopathological changes are caused by mechanical tissue damage during larval migration as well as secreted serine proteases and metalloproteases that degrade collagen and glycoproteins to facilitate larval migration [21,22]. In addition, such changes may also arise from the cytotoxic effect of eosinophilic granulocytes that accumulate in high numbers around the lesion [16].

Helminth infections in both humans and animals are characterized by induction of the T helper 2 (TH2) immune response, with the exception of species of the genus Trichuris, which elicit mixed TH1/TH2 response [23]. Although different types of parasite induce the TH2 response, effects of such a response can differ greatly either resulting in worm expulsion or downregulation of TH1 and TH17 thus preventing associated immunopathology [24]. The hallmark of the TH2 response is the production of type 2 cytokines such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, goblet cell (GC) hyperplasia and subsequent mucus production, mastocytosis, expansion of eosinophils and basophils as well as alternatively activated macrophages (AAM), which contribute to fibrosis and tissue repair [2527]. Although CD4+ cells are central players in the TH2 response, basophils and type 2 innate lymphoid cells are considered important primary sources of IL-4 and IL-13, respectively. These cytokines act in autocrine fashion to stimulate TH2-cells to reinforce their own production [25,28]. The majority of parasites establish chronic infections by downregulating host immune response, which is also beneficial for the host, as it diminishes related immunopathology [23]. In contrast, zoonotic infections where humans are accidental hosts, such as with anisakiasis, can result in more pronounced immune response and associated pathology [29].

Immune responses to pathogens can be regulated by several mechanisms, either post-transcriptionally via non-coding RNAs or pre-transcriptionally by modifying DNA (acetylation, methylation). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs, ~22 nt long, involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. [30,31]. A single miRNA can regulate more than one transcript and numerous miRNAs can regulate a single transcript. The involvement of specific miRNAs in immune responses to intracellular [32] and extracellular parasites [33] has been documented. DNA methylation represses gene expression by adding methyl groups to CpG dinucleotides in promoter regions of genes; thus, preventing binding of transcription factors [34].

To date, research on murine models of anisakiasis has focused mainly on chronic infection and allergic reactions, leaving a gap in our knowledge of the early immune response to Anisakis infection. Although reports of histopathological changes induced by Anisakis spp. larvae exist both from experimental anisakiasis [35] as well as human clinical cases (e.g. [36]), such studies employed only conventional histological techniques (i.e. hematoxylin-eosin staining) lacking immunophenotyping of cellular infiltrate or the ultrastructural details of observed histopathological changes.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the early immune response to Anisakis infection in rats both at cellular and molecular levels by i) assessing histopathological changes using three different approaches (i.e., classic histopathological analysis, immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopy); ii) measuring expression of a set of common inflammatory markers and their putative regulatory miRNAs in tissues where larval migration was observed and, iii) screening for changes in global DNA methylation in infected tissues.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

In vivo experiments on rats were performed at the University of Split Animal Facility (permit number HR-POK-19). The study was approved by Veterinary and Food Safety Authority, Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Croatia (permit number EP 18-2/2016) and Ethics Committee of the University of Split, School of Medicine (permit number 003-08/18-03/0001). All animal care and use protocols applied in this study adhere to Section three—Protection of animals used for scientific purposes of the Animal Protection Act of the Republic of Croatia (NN 102/17), which implements guidelines of the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (SL L 276, 20.10.2010).

Anisakis experimental infection of rats

Animals were raised and housed in plastic cages with sawdust bedding in a controlled environment (temperature 22 ± 1°C, 12 h dark/light cycle, food and water ad libitum) and were deprived of food 12 h prior to experimental infection.

Experimental Anisakis infection was performed on 10 male Sprague-Dawley rats (average weight 360.2 g ± SD 86.67 g) and tissue sampling for target gene and microRNA expression and methylated DNA quantification was set to 6 h post-infection (p.i.) based on the results from preliminary experiment performed on 15 female Sprague-Dawley rats (average weight 197 g ± SD 13.6 g). The preliminary experiment has been previously described in detail in [37]. The samples for histopathological analysis, immunofluorescence, and transmission electron microscopy were collected during the preliminary experiment (6, 10, 24, 48, 72 h p.i.) and used exclusively in this study. Prior to experimental infection, animals were anesthetized with a mixture of anesthetic and analgesic by intraperitoneal injection, 50–100 mg/kg Ketaminol (Richter Pharma AG, Wels, Austria), and 5–10 mg/kg Xylapan (Vetoquinol UK Ltd, Buckingham, UK). When no toe pinch reflex was detected, each animal was orally intubated with 10 live Anisakis larvae, collected from blue whiting Micromesistius poutassou, according to a previously described protocol [35]. Animals were euthanized by an overdose of anesthetic (> 150 mg/kg) followed by decapitation to confirm death. Each animal was dissected and inspected for lesions caused by migrating Anisakis larvae. Tissues with visible lesions with or without larva migrans were sampled and stored appropriately for downstream analyses (S1 Table). Additionally, adjoining unaffected tissue was sampled and served as an internal control in order to reduce interindividual variability. No external control (uninfected, “healthy” rats) was used in this study, considering that principal component analysis (PCA) results from our previous study showed higher variability between such specimens within the same experimental groups [37].

Histopathology of Anisakis lesions

For histopathological analysis, tissue samples of Anisakis lesions from preliminary experiments were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde on ice, processed using standard techniques, paraffin-embedded and cut to 5 μm thickness. Tissue sections were HE stained, mounted in Canada balsam (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, US), coverslipped and evaluated for histopathological changes using an Olympus CX40 microscope (Olympus Corp., Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). Photos were captured with an Olympus Camedia camera (Olympus Corp.) and assembled with Photoshop CS5 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).

Immunofluorescence

Cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and S100A8/A9 (calgranulin A and B, calprotectin as heterodimer; migration inhibitory factor-related protein 8 and 14) were chosen as markers for immunofluorescent evaluation of Anisakis lesions. CD3 is a pan T-cell marker, which associates with the T-cell receptor (TCR) to activate different subsets of T cells [38]. iNOS is one of three nitric oxide synthases (the other two being neuronal [nNOS] and endothelial [eNOS]) that is not constitutively expressed but strongly upregulated in many cell types in response to various pathogens [39]. S100A8 and A9 are alarmins or DAMPs (damage-associated molecular pattern proteins) that are secreted from damaged cells or activated granulocytes and monocytes, and play a pivotal role in mediating the inflammatory response [40]. Immunofluorescence staining was performed on 4% paraformaldehyde fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from the preliminary experiment. Tissue sections (5 μm) were placed on FLEX IHC microscope slides (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed by incubating sections at 95°C in Dako Antigen Retrieval Solution, pH = 6.0 (Dako) for 20 min. Following cooling to room temperature, sections were incubated in 1% BSA in PBS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, US) at room temperature to prevent non-specific binding. Due to high erythrocyte autofluorescence in the green channel, Image-iT FX signal enhancer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, US) was applied to slides stained with an Alexa Fluor488-conjugated secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature and washed with Dako Wash Buffer (TBS-Tween 20) (Dako) prior to BSA blocking. Sections were then incubated with rabbit anti-CD3 epsilon antibody (1:200, ab49943, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit anti-iNOS antibody (1:100, ab15323, Abcam) and mouse anti-MRP8+MRP14 [B314.1 (MAC 387)] (1:100, ab130234, Abcam) for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, sections were washed in Dako Wash Buffer and incubated with donkey anti-rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor594) (2 μg/ml, ab150068, Abcam) and goat anti-mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor488) (1:200, ab150117, Abcam), respectively, for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, sections were washed with TBS, counterstained with DAPI, and coverslip mounted using Shandon Immu-Mount (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, US). As a negative control, primary antibodies were omitted (Supporting information). Sections were inspected under a Zeiss Axio Imager M1 fluorescence microscope equipped with AxioCam Mrm Rev 3 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). Images were captured with AxioVision Rel. 4.7 software (Carl Zeiss AG) and assembled with Photoshop CS5 software (Adobe Systems).

Transmission electron microscopy

For TEM, small pieces of Anisakis-induced lesions from the preliminary experiment were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde on ice and post-fixed in 1% aqueous osmium tetroxide. In-block staining with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate was performed overnight, followed by dehydration in an ascending series of acetone and embedding in Durcupan resin (Honeywell-Fluka, Morris Plains, NJ, US). Semi-thin sections were cut to 500 μm, stained with 1% toluidine blue and inspected under a light microscope for orientation. Ultrathin sections were cut at 0.07 μm, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate [41], and inspected under a Jeol JEM-1400 TEM operating at 120 kV.

RNA extraction, target gene and miRNA expression

Total RNA was extracted using TriReagent (Ambion Inc., Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol and dissolved in 20–40 μL of Mili-Q water (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, US). The quantity and quality of extracted RNA were checked by spectrophotometry and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. Prior to cDNA synthesis, RNA samples were treated with DNA-free DNA Removal Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to avoid amplification of genomic DNA in the downstream analysis.

For target gene expression, cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, US) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Target genes were selected based on recently published transcriptomic data [37] and evidence for their regulation by miRNAs. The target genes are interleukin 1 beta (Il1b), Il6, Il18, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 (Ccl3), intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (Icam1), and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (Mmp9). Expression was quantified by real-time PCR using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche Diagnostics, Manheim, Germany) with cycling conditions as previously described [42] and annealing set to 60°C. Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29 (Vps29) and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (Gpi) were selected as reference genes based on their stability in recent transcriptome [37] and BestKeeper [43] analyses. Prior to real-time PCR, the template cDNA was diluted 1:20 with MilliQ water and each sample was run in duplicate. Primer3 (v. 4.1.0.) web interface [44] was used to create specific primers (Table 1).

Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used for gene expression analysis.

Primer name Nucleotide sequence (5’ → 3’)
Interleukin-1β
(Il-1β)
Rno_Il1B_F
Rno_Il1B_R
TCAAGCAGAGCACAGACCTG
ACTGCCCATTCTCGACAAGG
Interleukin-6
(Il-6)
Rno_Il6_F
Rno_Il6_R
GCAAGAGACTTCCAGCCAGT
TCTGACAGTGCATCATCGCT
Interleukin-18
(Il-18)
Rno_Il18_F
Rno_Il18_R
AGGACTGGCTGTGACCCTAT
TCCTGGCACACGTTTCTGAA
Matrix metallopeptidase 9
(Mmp9)
Rno_Mmp9_F
Rno_Mmp9_R
CCCGAGACCTGAAAACCTCC
GGCCTTTAGTGTCTCGCTGT
Intracellular adhesion molecule-1
(Icam-1)
Rno_Icam1_F
Rno_Icam1_R
CGGTGCTCAGGTATCCATCC
CTGTCTTCCCCAATGTCGCT
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3
(Ccl3)
Rno_Ccl3_F
Rno_Ccl3_R
CACCCTCTGTTACCTGCTCA
ATCTGCCGGTTTCTCTTGGT
Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29
(Vps29)
Rno_Vps29_F
Rno_Vps29_R
TGGTGACTGAACGGAATCCC
GGACATCACCAGCCAGAGTC
Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase
(Gpi)
Rno_Gpi_F
Rno_Gpi_R
GACGTGATGCCAGAGGTCAA
GTTTTGGCAATGTGGGTCCC

For miRNA expression, cDNA was synthesized using miScript II RT Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. miRNA expression was evaluated on miRNA PCR array Rat Immunopathology (MIRN-104ZF) plates with QuantiTect SYBR Green Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). All real-time PCR experiments were run on a LightCycler 480 II System (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland).

DNA extraction and global DNA methylation quantification

For DNA extraction, tissue samples were stored in 96% EtOH at 4°C until analysis. Total genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The quality and quantity of extracted DNA were checked as mentioned previously.

Global DNA methylation was quantified using a Methylated DNA Quantification Kit (Colorimetric) (ab117128, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The plate was read on a Microplate Photometer MPP-96 (Biosan, Riga, Latvia).

Statistical analysis

Log2 transformation and differential expression analysis of miRNA and target genes was performed with the limma package [45] for R (ver. 3.4.2) [46]. Target genes expression was normalized on individual basis against the geometric mean of two housekeeping genes (Vps29 and Gpi). Sample RN10_3K (intestine, uninfected) was excluded from further expression analysis since explorative analysis showed this sample to be an outlier. Expression analysis for both miRNA and target genes was run separately for each tissue using a paired design, which considers that uninfected (control) tissue was sampled from the same animal as infected tissue. Fold changes were calculated relative to the uninfected tissue as a group. Fold-change greater than 2 (log2FC ≥ 1) was considered biologically significant, while statistical significance was set to adjusted p-value < 0.05. Biological significance is regarded as a change high enough to result in certain outcome, i.e. change in gene expression that could result in enough protein secretion to manifest a certain effect. Target genes and miRNA expression analysis results were visualized with ggplot2 [47] and gplots [48] for R, respectively.

To test for differences in global DNA methylation between infected and uninfected tissue of rat stomach and intestine regarding alterations in global DNA methylation, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed in R. This non-parametric statistical hypothesis test is suitable for comparison of mean ranks between paired samples, as is the case in our sampling design. It does not require the assumption of a Gaussian distribution.

Results

Previous study published by same authors demonstrated a short Anisakis spp. infection duration in rats, with majority of introduced larvae (~70%) leaving the host within the first 24 h post-infection (p.i.) either by passage through the gastrointestinal tract with no visible tissue damage or by migration through the gastrointestinal wall [37]. The majority of migrating larvae penetrated the gastric wall, causing moderate to severe hemorrhages, with the remainder penetrating small intestine, cecum or colon. In three animals (two from the preliminary experiment and one from the main experiment) Anisakis spp. larvae were found penetrating abdominal wall musculature, causing mild hemorrhages visible upon gross pathological examination. The larvae that were not expelled with feces were found dwelling in the abdominal cavity, either migrating through the abdominal adipose tissues or in the process of spiralization on the surface of internal organs (liver, spleen).

Histopathology of Anisakis lesions

Larval penetration caused moderate to severe submucosal hemorrhage in stomach (Fig 1A), with focal to confluent fibrinoid necrosis in rare cases (Fig 1A inset). Moderate to abundant mixed inflammatory infiltrate composed of neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes, and eosinophilic granulocytes was seen. In animals euthanized at the first two time points (6 h and 10 h p.i.), neutrophils were the predominant cell population in inflammatory infiltrate, with scant eosinophilic granulocytes interspersed between zymogenic cells and muscularis mucosae. Lesions from animals euthanized at later time points (24 h, 48 h and 72 h p.i.) were characterized by more prominent mucosal and submucosal eosinophilic granulocyte infiltration (Fig 1B and 1B inset) with occasional neutrophils. In the intestine, Anisakis spp. larvae were found penetrating submucosal tissue and causing severe hemorrhage with perivascular fibrinoid necrosis (Fig 1C). Scant inflammatory infiltrate composed of neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes was seen in submucosal tissue, while the mucosal layer was infiltrated with scant eosinophilic granulocytes (Fig 1C inset). In contrast to the intestine, moderate to extensive hemorrhage was seen in the caecum (Fig 1D) with more pronounced inflammatory infiltrate composed of neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes and eosinophilic granulocytes infiltrating both mucosal and submucosal layers (Fig 1D inset). Larval migration through muscle tissue resulted in moderate hemorrhage in epimysial and perimysial connective tissue (Fig 1E) accompanied by mixed inflammatory infiltrate dominated by neutrophils and macrophages (Fig 1E inset), occasional eosinophilic granulocytes and scant lymphocytes. Muscle fibers showed signs of coagulative necrosis. Representative micrographs of uninfected control tissue are presented in S1 Fig.

Fig 1. Histopathological findings in rats infected with Anisakis spp. L3.

Fig 1

(A) Severe submucosal hemorrhage (H) in stomach at the stomach-esophageal junction, adjacent to the site of larval penetration with two necrotic foci (asterisks) around large blood vessels (Bv) (HE, 100x); (a) inset: high-power magnification of a necrotic focus showing vascular and perivascular necrosis, surrounded by abundant neutrophil and macrophage infiltrate (arrows) (400x); (B) Stomach of a rat euthanized 24 h p.i. with abundant eosinophil infiltrate in lamina propria and around blood vessels (Bv) (arrowhead) indicating recent extravasation (HE, 100x); (b) inset: detail of abundant eosinophil infiltrate (400x); (C) Severe submucosal hemorrhage (H) in intestine with a cross-section of Anisakis spp. larva (L3) (HE, 100x); (c) inset: detail of mucosa with rare eosinophils in lamina propria (arrowheads) (HE, 400x); (D) Extensive submucosal hemorrhage (H) in caecum (HE, 100x); (d) inset: detail of mucosa with abundant eosinophil infiltration (arrowheads) in lamina propria (HE, 400x); (E) Migration of Anisakis spp. larvae (L3) through epimysial connective tissue (Epm) causing moderate to extensive hemorrhage accompanied by mixed inflammatory infiltrate, composed mostly of neutrophils and macrophages (Mf = muscle fibers) (HE, 100x); (F) Muscle tissue adjacent to site of larval migration showing mild perimysial hemorrhage (asterisks) and focal necrosis of muscle fibers (Mf) (HE, 100x); (f) inset: detail of perimysial connective tissue with two blood vessels (Bv) surrounded by moderate neutrophil infiltrate (arrow) (400x). Scale bar (A, B, C, D, E, F) = 200 μm, scale bar (inset) = 50 μm.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescent labeling of lesions caused by migrating Anisakis larvae showed positive staining for all three antibodies applied (i.e. anti-CD3, anti-iNOS, and anti-MRP8+MRP14 (anti-S100A8/A9)). Anti-CD3 staining produced moderate to strong signal with thin ring-like cytoplasmic staining corresponding to scarce cytoplasm of lymphocytes. CD3+ cells were most abundant in the stomach, usually seen in groups within or adjacent to larger blood vessels (Fig 2A, 2B, and 2C), indicating recent and ongoing extravasation. Occasionally, single CD3+ cells were observed deeper in the submucosa within large hemorrhages or very rarely in the lamina propria. In the intestine, only a few cells moderately expressing CD3 were observed in the submucosa with similar localization as in the stomach (Fig 2D, 2E, and 2F) (i.e. within or adjacent to blood vessels). The smallest number of CD3+ cells, but with strongest expression, was found in muscle tissue. Single cells were occasionally seen within blood vessels or infiltrating perimysial connective tissue (Fig 2G, 2H, and 2I). Uninfected control tissue and negative stain control tissue are presented in S2 Fig and S3 Fig, respectively.

Fig 2. Representative micrographs of CD3 immunolabeling in rats experimentally infected with Anisakis spp. third-stage larvae.

Fig 2

(A) Moderate CD3 expression on a large number of T lymphocytes (arrows) in stomach adjacent to blood vessel; (B) DAPI-stained cell nuclei; (C) Merge of (A) + (B); (D) Two lymphocytes in the intestinal submucosa showing strong CD3 expression (arrows); (E) DAPI-stained cell nuclei; (F) Merge of (D) + (E); (G) Single T lymphocyte with very strong CD3 expression in perimysial connective tissue (arrow); (H) DAPI-stained nuclei; (I) Merge of (G) + (H). Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

Anti-iNOS immunolabeling produced moderate to intense signal, showing either granular or diffuse cytoplasmic staining. In stomach, individual or small groups of iNOS+ cells could be seen throughout extensive submucosal hemorrhages (Fig 3A, 3B, and 3C). Most of these cells were characterized by moderate granular cytoplasmic and perinuclear staining, with occasional cells yielding stronger signals. Based on cellular and nuclear morphology the most abundant iNOS+ cells appeared to be neutrophils and fibrocytes, however, no staining with specific markers has been performed to confirm cell types. In intestine, similarly to the stomach, iNOS+ cells were observed throughout the submucosal hemorrhage but tended to group around the migrating Anisakis larva. Again, various cell types were iNOS+ but yielded a stronger signal than their counterparts in stomach (Fig 3D, 3E, and 3F). The highest number of iNOS+ cells, showing the strongest expression, was seen in muscles. Most of the cells showed strong granular or diffuse cytoplasmic staining (Fig 3G, 3H, and 3I). As in the stomach and intestine, the most abundant iNOS+ cells appeared to be neutrophils and fibrocytes. A low number of cells, most likely mononuclear phagocytes, showing very strong, diffuse cytoplasmic staining could be seen randomly dispersed in the perimysium or adjacent to blood vessels. Uninfected control tissue and negative stain control tissue are presented in S4 Fig and S5 Fig, respectively.

Fig 3. Representative micrographs of iNOS immunolabeling in rats experimentally infected with Anisakis spp. third-stage larvae.

Fig 3

(A) Moderate to strong granular cytoplasmic expression of iNOS in a low number of cells in stomach (arrows); (B) DAPI-stained cell nuclei; (C) Merge of (A) + (B); (D) Strong iNOS expression in intestinal cells adjacent to migrating Anisakis larvae (arrows); (E) DAPI-stained cell nuclei; (F) Merge of (D) + (E); (G) Very strong iNOS expression in perimysial connective tissue in cells most likely belonging to the mononuclear phagocyte system, adjacent to blood vessel (arrows); (H) DAPI-stained nuclei; (I) Merge of (G) + (H). Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

Anti-MRP8+MRP14 (anti-S100A8/A9) staining yielded moderate to very strong granular or diffuse cytoplasmic signals. In the stomach of animals euthanized at earlier time points, a fairly low number of cells with moderate to strong expression was seen in muscularis externa (Fig 4A, 4B, and 4C) together with, most likely, rare fibrocytes in the submucosa and eosinophils in the lamina propria, respectively; however no staining with specific markers has been performed to confirm cell types. In animals euthanized at later time points, groups of eosinophils with high expression could be seen in the lamina propria. In the intestine, a low number of MRP8+MRP14+ cells were seen, mostly fibrocytes and endothelial cells (Fig 4D, 4E, and 4F). The highest number of MRP8+MRP14+ cells with strongest expression was seen in muscle. Numerous immunoreactive cells, including most likely fibrocytes, eosinophils, and neutrophils, yielding strong (rarely very strong) signals, could be seen in perimysium and epimysium. However, considerably stronger expression, occasionally exceptionally strong, was seen in myocytes, which were also the most abundant MRP8+MRP14+ cells (Fig 4G, 4H, and 4I). In longitudinal muscle fiber section, strong granular sarcoplasmic staining could be seen, while in cross-sections, cells yielded strong diffuse sarcoplasmic signals. Uninfected control tissue and negative stain control tissue are presented in S6 Fig and S7 Fig, respectively.

Fig 4. Representative micrographs of S100A8/A9 (MRP8+MRP14) immunolabeling in rats experimentally infected with Anisakis spp. third-stage larvae.

Fig 4

(A) Strong diffuse cytoplasmic labeling of S100A8/A9 in a low number of cells in the inner layer of the muscularis externa of rat stomach (arrows); (B) DAPI-stained cell nuclei; (C) Merge of (A) + (B); (D) Moderate diffuse cytoplasmic expression of S100A8/A9 in endothelial cells in intestinal submucosa; (E) DAPI-stained cell nuclei; (F) Merge of (D) + (E); (G) Very strong sarcoplasmic expression of S100A8/A9 in abdominal muscle myocytes (arrows); (H) DAPI-stained nuclei; (I) Merge of (G) + (H). Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

TEM

TEM analysis of Anisakis-induced lesions revealed ultrastructural details of inflammatory infiltrate and tissues changes. As seen in paraffin sections, gastric lesions were characterized by hemorrhage and abundant neutrophil and macrophage infiltration (Fig 5A and 5B). The characteristic “coffee bean” structure of cytoplasmic granules evidenced the presence of eosinophils in inflammatory infiltrate and a lack of mast cells (Fig 5B). Macrophages with engulfed erythrocytes could occasionally be seen. In the intestine, neutrophils and eosinophils were seen mixed with erythrocytes and interspersed between bundles of collagen fibers. A single plasma cell, with elaborate endoplasmic reticulum, was seen associated with several eosinophils (Fig 5C). However, an unexpected finding of numerous fungus-like organisms (Fig 5C inset) with intraluminal and submucosal localization was noticed, some of which were endocytosed by eosinophils. The organisms were elongated and round in cross-section, several micrometers long (up to 9 μm) and with electron light intracytoplasmic granules. Similarly, neutrophil, macrophage, and eosinophil infiltration (lacking mast cells) was observed in caecum (Fig 5D). In muscle, several areas of structurally fragmented and necrotic fibers were observed (Fig 5E). These areas were heavily infiltrated with a mixture of neutrophils, macrophages, and eosinophils (Fig 5E), some with expelled granules.

Fig 5. Transmission electron micrographs of lesions in rats experimentally infected with Anisakis spp. third-stage larvae.

Fig 5

(A) Hemorrhage (H) in lamina propria of stomach with three macrophages (Mφ); (B) Rat stomach adjacent to site of larval migration through stomach wall with neutrophil (Neu) and eosinophil (Eo) infiltration; (C) Rat intestine adjacent to site of larval migration through intestinal wall with a single erythrocyte (Er) indicative of hemorrhage and eosinophil (Eo) and macrophage (Mφ) infiltration; bottom of picture shows elaborate endoplasmic reticulum indicative of a plasma cell (Pc). Inset: numerous elongated fungus-like organisms with electron lucent intracytoplasmic granules; (D) Mixed inflammatory infiltrate of rat caecum composed of neutrophils (Neu), eosinophils (Eo) and macrophages (Mφ) interspersed between collagen fibers (Cf) and mixed with non-nucleated erythrocytes (Er) indicating hemorrhage; (E) Necrotic myocytes of abdominal muscle with fragmented muscle fibers (Mf); few neutrophils with outspread pseudopodia migrating over muscle fibers (Mf) and a single macrophage (Mφ) are visible; (F) Mixed inflammatory infiltrate of rat muscle dominated by neutrophils (Neu), and few eosinophils (Eo), macrophages (Mφ), and erythrocytes (Er), indicating hemorrhage. Osmium tetroxide/lead citrate, scale bar: (A, E, F) = 10 μm, scale bar (B, C) = 2 μm, scale bar (D, C inset) = 5 μm.

Target gene expression

The expression of target genes was examined in stomach, intestine, and visceral adipose tissue. Out of six tested target genes, five were differentially expressed in stomach, none in intestine, and all six in visceral adipose tissue. In stomach, five genes were upregulated and only Mmp9 was negligibly downregulated (Fig 6A). The highest fold change was observed for Il6, followed by Ccl3, Il1b, Icam1, and Il18 (Fig 6B). Biologically significant induction was recorded for Il6, Ccl3, Il1b, and Icam1. In intestine, four genes were upregulated, with Il18 being weekly downregulated, and Icam1 showing no change in expression (Fig 6A). The highest fold change was observed for Il6, which was the only biologically significant induction among the target genes (Fig 6B). In visceral adipose tissue, all target genes were upregulated (Fig 6A) with highest fold-change observed for Ccl3, followed by Il1b, Il6, Mmp9, Icam1, and Il18 (Fig 6B). Biologically significant induction was recorded for all genes except for Il18.

Fig 6. Expression of target genes in tissues of rats experimentally infected with Anisakis spp. third-stage larvae.

Fig 6

(A) Distribution of target gene expression in stomach, intestine, and visceral adipose tissues grouped according to state (infected or uninfected). Box plots represent distribution of log2-normalized expression; (B) Log2-transformed fold changes of target gene expression with respective adjusted p-values.

miRNA expression

miRNA expression was examined in stomach and intestinal tissues (Fig 7A). In stomach, two miRNAs were differentially expressed (rno-miR-451-5p and -223-3p), both displaying statistical and biological significance (Fig 7A and 7B). Similarly, two miRNAs were differentially expressed in intestine (rno-miR-451-5p and -672-5p) (Fig 7A and 7B), also displaying statistical and biological significance. When the non-adjusted p-value was considered, four additional miRNAs were differentially expressed in stomach; three were upregulated (rno-miR-142-3p, -142-5p, and -18a-5p) and one was downregulated (rno-miR-205) (Fig 7B). In intestine, three additional miRNAs were differentially expressed when the non-adjusted p-value was considered; two were upregulated (rno-miR-363-3p and -196a-5p) and one was downregulated (rno-miR-298-5p) (Fig 7B). Rno-miR-451-5p was the only differentially expressed miRNA in both stomach and intestine.

Fig 7. miRNAs expression in stomach and intestine of rats experimentally infected with Anisakis spp. third-stage larvae.

Fig 7

(A) Two-dimensional hierarchical clustering and heatmap of log2-normalized miRNA expression (Manhattan distance), grouped according to their expression profiles, tissue of origin (stomach and intestine), and tissue state (infected or uninfected). Color key ranges from white to light grey for downregulated (−2 to 0, Z-scores) and from light grey to black for upregulated (0–2, Z-scores) miRNAs. Only differentially expressed miRNAs (p < 0.05) in stomach and intestine are listed on the right (adjusted p-value < 0.05 in bold). (RN7_3, RN8_1, RN9_6: stomach, infected; RN7_3K, RN8_1K, RN9_6K: stomach, uninfected; RN6_4, RN7_5, RN10_3: intestine, infected; RN6_4K, RN7_5K: intestine, uninfected); (B) Log2-transformed fold changes with respective p-values and adjusted p-values of differentially expressed miRNAs in stomach and intestine.

DNA methylation

Total methylated DNA was quantified in stomach and intestine. No statistically significant difference (at p < 0.05) in DNA methylation was detected between infected (mean 2.56 ng, SD ± 1.03 ng) and uninfected (mean 3.08 ng, SD ± 1.39 ng) stomach tissues or infected (mean 4.25 ng, SD ± 1.80 ng) and uninfected (mean 4.90 ng, SD ± 2.25 ng) intestine tissue of rats, respectively.

Discussion

Here we present the results of a comprehensive cellular and molecular analysis of the early rat immune response to experimental Anisakis spp. infection. A limited number of studies have tackled the pathology in this host-parasite system, concentrating on general histopathological analyses (HE staining, trichrome staining) [35] and more recently tissue transcriptomics [37] and miRNA expression analysis in sera of infected animals [49]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive histopathological analysis of Anisakis lesions inferred by classic histopathology, immunofluorescence (IF), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In addition, for better insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms of the visible changes, we validated the histology findings by quantification of target genes and miRNA expression in tissues affected by larval migration, and the screening of global DNA methylation levels in Anisakis-infected vs. uninfected tissues.

Histopathological analysis of Anisakis lesions revealed an acute and generally strong tissue inflammatory response, mostly dominated by neutrophils and macrophages. Both stomach and intestine tissues were hallmarked by extensive submucosal hemorrhages as well as vascular wall and perivascular necrosis, which facilitated leukocyte extravasation through increased vascular permeability. In addition to larva-induced trauma of the tissues accounting for the hemorrhages, Anisakis spp. larvae also secrete various proteolytic enzymes [22,50] that degrade surrounding host tissue enhancing larval movement and leading to cellular necrosis. Necrosis is a form of uncontrolled cell death that leads to leakage of various intracellular components, which can further stimulate the inflammatory response [51]. However, the abundance of the observed inflammatory infiltrate differed between stomach and intestine, being markedly elevated in the stomach. The rationale for a such discrepancy could lie in earlier larval penetration through the stomach compared to the intestinal wall, allowing more time for immune cell infiltration of the affected tissues. A similar predominance of neutrophil and macrophage lineages was observed in affected muscle tissue, but with comparatively less inflammatory infiltrate than in stomach. In addition to the later occurrence of larval migration through muscle tissue compared to stomach and consequent later mobilization of immune cells, it appears that the intact blood vessels in the muscle being less permeable to leukocyte extravasation could have added to the infiltrate scarcity. Although helminth infections are usually associated with a marked increase in eosinophil count (eosinophilia) [52], we observed increased numbers of infiltrating eosinophils only in tissues from animals euthanized at later time points (24h, 48 h, and 72h p.i.). Pronounced eosinophil infiltration and subsequent formation of eosinophilic granuloma have been recorded in many cases of human anisakiasis [20,36]. However, eosinophilia is usually not constant at the beginning of clinical manifestations in humans [53] suggesting that the small number of observed eosinophils in rat could be simply due to tissue sampling before the onset of eosinophil infiltration. Nevertheless, eosinophil degranulation occurred early in the course of infection, as revealed by TEM, suggesting that the initial priming has been achieved

Neutrophils are the first cellular component to respond to inflammation and tissue damage, reacting to a wide range of PAMPs or DAMPs, including large and antigenically complex metazoan pathogens. Neutrophil-mediated recruitment of other granulocytes and monocytes at the infection site [54,55] supports our findings. Macrophages have pleiotropic functions, both as immune effector cells and in maintaining tissue homeostasis, including phagocytosis of erythrocytes and clearing of cellular debris [56]. During several helminth infections, a subset of macrophages termed alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs) has been observed [26]. These macrophages are activated in response to TH2 cytokines, IL4 and -13, and are characterized by the production of several enzymes such as arginase-1, which is involved in collagen deposition [26,56]. Although their function as effector cells in worm expulsion has been demonstrated in mice infected with the natural gastrointestinal helminth Heligmosmoides polygyrus [57], AAM function in wound healing and tissue remodeling caused by large metazoan parasites could be more important than host defense per se [56]. Indeed, in addition to neutrophils, we observed the presence of numerous macrophages. Both cell lineages were associated with necrotic tissue in stomach and muscle. Likewise, TEM revealed the presence of numerous macrophages with engulfed erythrocytes. This high number of macrophages and neutrophils, especially, could also account for the later onset of eosinophil tissue infiltration in the early phase of infection. In the case of Strongyloides stercolaris, another intestinal tissue-dwelling nematode, macrophages and neutrophils alone can kill its larvae if soluble factors from either cell type are present [58]. A similar succession of large numbers of neutrophils gradually being replaced by macrophages and eosinophils has also been seen in early Ascaris spp. infection in mice [59], although the comparison with Anisakis needs to be taken cautiously, as the early infection phase of the former occurs in lungs.

Immunofluorescence of rat sections clearly demonstrated early (6 h p.i.) infiltration of CD3+ cells in Anisakis lesions. CD3 is a pan T-cell marker, which functions as a TCR co-receptor during activation of different T-cell subsets. A lower number of CD3+ cells was seen in both intestine and muscle compared to stomach, which is consistent with the later occurrence of larval migration through these tissues. Interestingly, compared to a single CD3+ cell in muscle, the highest number of these cells was seen in the intestine, probably due to the lesion’s proximity to one of the intestinal lymphoid follicles. Helminth infections are typically characterized by strong polarization of TH2 immune response [23]. However, in Trichuris muris infections, the worm burden can influence the polarization towards either TH1 or TH2, such that a reduced worm burden promotes the TH1 response [60]. Furthermore, in patients with trichinellosis, about half of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) display a TH2 profile with the other half displaying either TH0 or TH1 profiles [61]. In the blood of Anisakis simplex-sensitized patients, both TH1 and TH2 cytokines have been recorded. However, a TH1-dominant response is characteristic for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms [62]. Whether such peripheral immune responses reflect the localized response in the GI tract still remains to be elucidated, requiring detailed immunophenotyping of the infiltrating T-cell populations in Anisakis lesions. Immunofluorescent iNOS labeling showed the presence of different iNOS+ cells in all three tissues examined. iNOS is expressed by a number of cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells. High levels of nitric oxide (NO) are produced by macrophages in response to microbial products and TH1 cytokines [39], as well as protozoan [63] and metazoan parasites [64,65]. In addition to antimicrobial and antiparasitic effects, NO has cytotoxic effects [39,66], which could partially account for the observed Anisakis changes. Interestingly, the strongest iNOS expression was seen in affected muscle in several cell types including neutrophils, fibrocytes, and phagocytes both in epimysium near the site of larval penetration and distantly in the perimysium. High macrophage iNOS production was also recorded in Trichinella spiralis-infected mice, adjacent to encysted larva and surrounding muscle fibres, being most pronounced in the late phase of muscle infection [67]. Being able to cross-infect rodents, Trichinella spp. naturally reside within their striated muscles, in contrast to Anisakis for which rats and humans are naïve accidental hosts. This suggests that, being in an unfavorable environment such as striated muscle, Anisakis spp. could induce an early explosive iNOS expression like Trichinella, however, with substantial temporal difference. S100A8 and S100A9 are alarmins or DAMPs, which are constitutively expressed in neutrophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells but can also be secreted from activated or damaged macrophages, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and keratinocytes [40,68]. We observed the presence of S100A8/S100A9+ cells in all three tissues examined, with the highest number of cells and the strongest expression in muscle. Unfortunately, with the applied antibody, we were not able to discern between the two proteins expressed, or their complex whatsoever. In vivo studies have demonstrated chemotactic activity of S100A8/A9 proteins as early as three hours post-stimulation [69]. The complex influences endothelial integrity through inhibition of several cell-junction proteins [70] thus facilitating leukocyte migration. Given the abundant neutrophil infiltrate and several perivascular necrotic foci in stomach, we unexpectedly identified a negligible number of cells with cytoplasmic expression of these proteins in stomach, mostly localized in the muscularis externa. This suggests that the tissue sampling (10 h p.i.) coincided with the cells having already secreted the complex into the extracellular space, affecting its intracellular detection. The detection was further hindered by high autofluorescence of the hemorrhages. Similarly, a relatively small number of S100A8/A9+ cells were detected in the intestine, mostly expressed by endothelial cells and possibly occasional fibrocytes. Whether the low number of positive cells is due to early sampling (relative to larval migration time) remains unclear, considering the overall moderate inflammatory infiltrate. In muscle tissue, we found various S100A8/A9+ cells, most likely fibrocytes, neutrophils, and occasional eosinophils, which is consistent with previous reports [68,71]. However, the very strong expression in myocytes is puzzling. While expression of these proteins can be induced in murine vascular smooth muscle cells or cardiomyocytes following inflammatory stimuli such as bacterial infection [72], we failed to find references demonstrating expression of these markers at the protein level in skeletal muscle. However, in a recently published transcriptome analysis of A. pegreffii-infected rats, S100A8 and S100A9 were among the most highly expressed genes [37]. S100A8/A9 protein expression during helminth infection (particularly in neutrophils), has been demonstrated in lung inflammation in mice following infection with Litomosoides sigmodontis L3 larvae [73] as well as at the mRNA level in sheep infected with the digenean Fasciola hepatica [74].

Acute inflammation, such as in a rat model of Anisakis spp. infection, is characterized by production of numerous cytokines and signaling molecules that govern the immune response and wound healing after tissue damage. Here, we assessed the expression of several common inflammatory markers (i.e., Il1b, Il6, Il18, Ccl3, and Icam1, as well as Mmp9, which is involved in tissue remodeling [75]). Interestingly, while all markers except Mmp9 were differentially expressed in adipose and stomach tissues, respectively, no difference was detected in the intestine. As mentioned earlier, severe submucosal hemorrhages were present both in stomach and intestine following larval migration. Hemorrhages have been shown to potentiate the expression and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1 beta and IL-6, as well as delay wound healing following trauma [76]. In contrast, the lack of significant induction of these genes in the intestine is likely due to the early sampling in respect to larval penetration, corresponding to observed mild to moderate inflammatory infiltrate in paraffin sections. However, the possibility that proinflammatory cytokines other than those evaluated are induced earlier in response to Anisakis migrating larvae should not be excluded. Surprisingly, all six genes were differentially expressed in visceral adipose tissue, with all but Il18 displaying a biologically significant induction. In addition to the most abundant adipocytes, adipose accumulations encompass various tissue types, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblast as well as almost all immune cells including resident macrophages, neutrophils, T cells, and B cells, to name a few [77]. In addition to energy storage, adipose tissues have an important role in regulating both local and systemic inflammation through secretion of anti- and proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1 beta, IL-6, and IL-18 [78], as well as MMP9 [79]. However, at this point, it remains unclear whether such strong induction of proinflammatory genes in adipose tissue is due to the mere presence of Anisakis larva, tissue damage and inflammation in adjoining tissue or both. In stomach, Mmp9 was the only gene that showed virtually no difference in expression compared to control. MMP9 is known to be involved in tissue remodeling and wound repair; however, wound healing might be delayed by hemorrhage through increased production of proinflammatory cytokines [76]. The lack of change in Mmp9 expression could be the result of delayed induction due to severe submucosal hemorrhages. In addition, MMP9 is suggested to be important for neutrophil migration through basement membrane [80], congruent with our histology data, as we found no intraepithelial infiltration of neutrophils, likely due to no Mmp9 expression at this site. All three proinflammatory cytokines (i.e. Il1b, Il6, and Il18) were differentially expressed in stomach, although Il18 did not display biologically significant induction. Both IL-1β and IL-18 are activated and secreted from multiprotein complexes called inflammasomes, containing one of the NOD-like receptors (NLRs), such as NLRP3 [81]. The difference in expression of these two genes could, therefore, be due to factors other than the mechanism of activation shown in the mouse model of Trichuris muris infection, where both the worm and its secreted products induced NLRP3-dependent production of IL-18 [82]. IL-18 induces TH1 polarization through secretion of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), except in the absence of IL-12 or IL15, when it promotes TH2 polarization [83]. Indeed, T. spiralis-infected IL-18 knockout mice had significantly higher production of TH2 cytokines with lower worm burden, compared to wild type-mice [84]. Nevertheless, induction of Il18 and its role in driving the TH1 response could indicate that early rat responses to Anisakis spp. are of mixed TH1/TH2 type possibly with TH2 predominance, similar to the intestinal phase of mouse T. spiralis infection [85]. IL-1β is a major endogenous pyrogen, which activates neutrophils and macrophages for phagocytosis of invading pathogens and production of oxygen and nitrogen radicals. In addition, it stimulates production of other proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and IL-6 [81]. However, in the context of helminth resistance, IL-1 beta can have contrasting effects. While it attenuates the protective TH2 response and promotes parasite chronicity in H. polygyrus infection [86], it induces the TH2 response and parasite expulsion in T. muris infection [87]. How IL-1 beta affects immunity during Anisakis infection remains unclear because the parasite fails to achieve adult stage in the accidental host, which would warrant chronic inflammation, or has a low chance of re-infecting the same accidental host over a longer time span. Remarkably strong expression was observed for Il6 (logFC = 4.07). IL-6 is another major endogenous pyrogen, which plays a pivotal role in the immune response by switching from neutrophil to monocyte recruitment, skewing monocyte differentiation into macrophages and T-cell expression and differentiation to TH2 and TH17 phenotypes [88]. However, mice infected with H. polygyrus had a suppressed TH2 response and higher number of FoxP3+ cells compared to IL-6-deficient mice [89], indicating a pleiotropic role for this cytokine in regulating the immune system. Interestingly, we noted a very strong expression of Ccl3, which exceeded the expression of Il1b. CCL3 is a chemokine with pyrogenic properties, but more importantly is a chemoattractant for neutrophils and an activator of their oxidative burst [90]. In contrast to S100A8/A9+ cells, which were observed in small numbers, the strong Ccl3 expression likely accounted for the abundant neutrophil infiltration observed in Anisakis lesions. Although significant, Icam1 displayed moderate expression compared to the aforementioned markers. ICAM1 is expressed by endothelial cells and upon inflammatory stimulus leads to increased leukocyte transmigration and increased vascular permeability through downregulation of cell-junction proteins [91]. ICAM1 regulates adhesion of neutrophils to endothelium and their transendothelial migration via either paracellular or transcellular routes [92]. Therefore, the abundant neutrophil infiltration is likely a result of the combined effects of CCL3 and ICAM1, although the latter showed four-fold lower expression than the former. This discrepancy in expression is possibly due to vascular wall necrosis leading to a partial loss of Icam1 mRNA. Both live L3 Anisakis larvae and protein crude extract (CE), which simulates dying larva, were recently found to stimulate human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) to secrete CCL3, IL-6, soluble ICAM1 (sICAM1), and IL-1 alpha, another isoform of IL-1 with properties overlapping IL-1 beta [93], thus, confirming our findings.

MicroRNA expression analysis was performed in stomach and intestine tissues affected by Anisakis larval migration. In total, three miRNAs were differentially expressed, two in stomach (rno-miRNA-451-5p and -223-3p) and two in intestine (rno-miRNA-451-5p and -672-5p), with rno-miRNA-451-5p being expressed in both tissues. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first miRNA expression analysis performed in tissue samples directly affected by larval migration, rather than in sera of infected animals as reported by Corcuera et al. (2018). The authors found two differentially expressed miRNAs in rat sera, in addition to four others based on RQ values, which were different to those we identified in tissues. However, this could be attributed to the mode of infection (live L3 vs. crude extract inoculated into gastric mucosa), duration of infection (6 h p.i. vs. 2.5 months) and sample type (affected tissues vs. serum). In Anisakis stomach lesions, miRNA-451 displayed particularly strong expression (logFC = 4.51, adj. p = 1.88e-8) and roughly four-fold lower expression in intestine (logFC = 2.42, adj. p = 0.036). miRNA-451 has been shown to downregulate CD4+ T-cell proliferation, as evidenced by mice infected with Plasmodium yoelli having significantly lower numbers of CD4+ cells in addition to higher parasite burden compared to miR-451-/- mice [94]. Furthermore, miR-451 impairs neutrophil chemotaxis [95] and negatively affects secretion of IL-6 and CCL3 [96]. In stomach, we observed abundant neutrophil infiltration as well as strong expression of both Il6 and Ccl3. IL-6 has been shown to positively regulate expression of miR-451, potentially forming a regulatory loop that culminates in decreased IL-6 expression [96]. Therefore, the expression of miR-451 in stomach is likely the consequence of strong positive feedback of Il6 expression, aimed at the downregulation of over expressed Il6. Interestingly, mild inflammatory infiltrate coupled with the lack of statistically significant expression of the target genes was seen in intestine, although miR-451 was significantly expressed. Nevertheless, we observed biologically significant induction of Il6 (logFC = 1.47), which might have been sufficient to drive initial expression of this particular miRNA. Although being expressed eight-fold lower than miR-451, miR-223 showed significantly higher expression in stomach compared to control. It was reported that absence of miR-223 drives accelerated recruitment of myeloid cells (i.e. polymorphonuclear leukocytes and mononuclear phagocytes) at the site of infection, and subsequent tissue damage [97]. Therefore, we hypothesize that induction of this miRNA serves to limit neutrophil infiltration and consequent tissue damage, and gradual substitution with other immune cells. Furthermore, miRNA-223 has also been reported to directly target Ccl3 and Il6 [97]. In addition, miRNA-223 has been reported to negatively regulate the production of IL-1 beta by repression of the NLRP3 inflammasome [98]. Taken together, it appears that miRNA-223 could play an important role in shaping Anisakis pathology despite substantially lower expression compared to miR-451. However, IL-6 itself is able to downregulate expression of miRNA-223 [99]. Therefore, the difference in expression between miRNA-223 and miR-451 could be attributed to strong Il6 expression. Intestinal expression of miR-672 during Anisakis infection remains enigmatic, as does its role in regulation of mRNA in general. Namely, data on the function of miR-672 is scarce, except for evidence of its modulation in a murine model of acute and chronic asthma [100]. Considering the substantial difference in inflammatory infiltrate between stomach and intestine and modest downregulation of this miRNA in stomach, we can only assume that the quantity and type of immune cells infiltrating the two organs account for miR-672 induction in the intestine.

In addition to post-transcriptional regulation via miRNAs, gene expression can be regulated by chemical modifications, such as DNA methylation, which prevents binding of transcription factors by introducing changes in promoter regions [34]. Moreover, aberrant DNA methylation has been associated with several types of cancer due to repression of tumor-suppressor genes [101]. In this study, we screened for changes in global DNA methylation status and found no significant differences between infected and uninfected tissue. We argue that despite our results, DNA methylation could indeed have a role in the immune response to Anisakis infection, but the effect is probably reserved for prolonged Anisakis infection or to specific genes non-discernible by performed design. In a murine model of urogenital schistosomiasis, changes in DNA methylation levels coincided with urothelial hyperplasia, a key preneoplastic lesion leading to schistosomal bladder cancer [102]. Unlike S. haematobium, Anisakis spp. are not considered carcinogenic, but their potential role in carcinogenesis has been controversial ever since it was suggested that A. simplex might be a co-factor for the development of gastric cancer [103]. Interestingly, Sonoda et al. [104] summarized 27 cases reporting attachment of Anisakis larva to GI cancer, and given the role of methylation in carcinogenesis, this interaction warrants further research.

Taken together, our results show that Anisakis spp. trigger a rapid and robust immune response in rats, characterized by abundant neutrophil and macrophage infiltration and significant induction of Il6 and Il1b proinflammatory cytokines and the chemokine Ccl3, which were among the most highly expressed genes of more than 1300 differentially expressed genes in the transcriptome of Anisakis pegreffii-infected rats [37]. Moreover, three miRNAs were differentially expressed, indicating their involvement in particular mRNA expression profiles measured in affected tissues. However, the functional role of these miRNAs in Anisakis infection remains unknown. In contrast, no changes in DNA methylation status were observed between infected and uninfected tissue tissues. Establishing chronic infection and employing different methodological approaches to study the functional role of miRNAs and DNA methylation will help to address some of the controversies surrounding Anisakis infection in humans.

Supporting information

S1 Table. List of samples used for each downstream analysis.

(PHD-classic histopathology; IF-immunofluorescence; TEM-transmission electron microscopy; miRNA-miRNA profiling; TGE-target gene expression; DNAm-DNA methylation)

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Representative micrographs showing uninfected tissue controls.

(A) Stomach, cardiac region; (B) Stomach, body, greater curvature; (C) Intestine; (D) Muscle. HE, scale bar = 200 μm.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Representative micrographs of CD3 immunolabeling of uninfected control tissue.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (C, D, E) Intestine; (E, F, G) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar: (A, B, C, G, H, I) = 20 μm, (D, E, F) = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Representative micrographs of negative stain control for CD3 antibody.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (D, E, F) Intestine; (G, H, I) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Representative micrographs of iNOS immunolabeling of uninfected control tissue.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (C, D, E) Intestine; (E, F, G) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Representative micrographs of negative stain control for iNOS antibody.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (D, E, F) Intestine; (G, H, I) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Representative micrographs of S100A8/A9 (MRP8+MRP14) immunolabeling of uninfected control tissue.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (C, D, E) Intestine; (E, F, G) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Representative micrographs of negative stain control for S100A8/A9 (MRP8+MRP9) antibody.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (D, E, F) Intestine; (G, H, I) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by Croatian Science Foundation, project AnGEl: Anisakis spp.: Genomic Epidemiology, grant #5576 to IM and Ph.D. grant to JH (Croatian Science Foundation Activity No. A557042) (http://www.hrzz.hr/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Broglia A, Kapel C. Changing dietary habits in a changing world: Emerging drivers for the transmission of foodborne parasitic zoonoses. Vet Parasitol. Elsevier B.V.; 2011;182: 2–13. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chai J-Y, Murrell KD, Lymbery AJ. Fish-borne parasitic zoonoses: Status and issues. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35: 1233–1254. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO. First formal meeting of the Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG). 2007;
  • 4.Torgerson PR, de Silva NR, Fèvre EM, Kasuga F, Rokni MB, Zhou X-N, et al. The global burden of foodborne parasitic diseases: an update. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30: 20–26. 10.1016/j.pt.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards. Scientific opinion on risk assessment of parasites in fishery products. EFSA J. 2010;8: 1543. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bouwknegt M, Devleesschauwer B, Graham H, Robertson LJ, van der Giessen JWB, Participants E-F workshop. Prioritisation of food-borne parasites in Europe, 2016. Eurosurveillance. 2018;29: pii = 17–00161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cavallero S, Martini A, Migliara G, De Vito C, Iavicoli S, D’Amelio S. Anisakiasis in Italy: Analysis of hospital discharge records in the years 2005–2015. PLoS One. 2018;13: 1–11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0208772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yera H, Fréalle É, Dutoit E, Dupouy-Camet J. A national retrospective survey of anisakidosis in France (2010–2014): decreasing incidence, female predominance, and emerging allergic potential. Parasite. 2018;25: 23 10.1051/parasite/2018016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bao M, Pierce GJ, Pascual S, González-Muñoz M, Mattiucci S, Mladineo I, et al. Assessing the risk of an emerging zoonosis of worldwide concern: anisakiasis. Sci Rep. 2017;7: 43699 10.1038/srep43699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marcogliese DJ. The role of zooplankton in the transmission of helminth parasites to fish. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1995;5: 336–371. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abollo E, López A, Gestal C, Benavente P, Pascual S. Long-term recording of gastric ulcers in cetaceans stranded on the Galician (NW Spain) coast. Dis Aquat Organ. 1998;32: 71–73. 10.3354/dao032071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Motta MRA, Pinheiro DCSN, Carvalho VL, Viana DDA, Vicente ACP, Iñiguez AM. Gastric lesions associated with the presence of Anisakis spp. Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in cetaceans stranded on the coast of Ceara, Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 2008;8: 91–95. 10.1590/S1676-06032008000200010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jaber JR, Pérez J, Arbelo M, Zafra R, Fernández A. Pathological and immunohistochemical study of gastrointestinal lesions in dolphins stranded in the Canary Islands. Vet Rec. 2006;159: 410–414. 10.1136/vr.159.13.410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hrabar J, Bocina I, Gudan Kurilj A, Đuras M, Mladineo I. Gastric lesions in dolphins stranded along the Eastern Adriatic coast. Dis Aquat Organ. 2017;125: 125–139. 10.3354/dao03137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sakanari JA, Mckerrow JH. Anisakiasis. Clin Microbiol Rewievs. 1989;2: 278–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Audicana MT, Kennedy MW. Anisakis simplex: from obscure infectious worm to inducer of immune hypersensitivity. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21: 360–379. 10.1128/CMR.00012-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hochberg NSS, Hamer DHH. Anisakidosis: perils of the deep. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51: 806–812. 10.1086/656238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Daschner A, Cuéllar C, Rodero M. The Anisakis allergy debate: does an evolutionary approach help? Trends Parasitol. 2012;28: 9–14. 10.1016/j.pt.2011.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Takabe K, Ohki S, Kunihiro O, Sakashita T, Endo I, Ichikawa Y, et al. Anisakidosis: a cause of intestinal obstruction from eating sushi. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93: 1172–1173. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00356.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kang DB, Park WC, Lee JK. Chronic gastric anisakiasis provoking a bleeding gastric ulcer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;86: 270–273. 10.4174/astr.2014.86.5.270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sakanari JA, McKerrow JH. Identification of the secreted neutral proteases from Anisakis simplex. J Parasitol. 1990;76: 625–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee J-D, Chung L-Y, Lin R-J, Wang J-J, Tu H-P, Yen C-M. Excretory/secretory proteases and mechanical movement of Anisakis pegreffii infective larvae in the penetration of BALB/c mice gastrointestine. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC; 2017;33: 594–601. 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zaph C, Cooper PJ, Harris NL. Mucosal immune responses following intestinal nematode infection. Parasite Immunol. 2014;36: 439–452. 10.1111/pim.12090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Anthony RM, Rutitzky LI, Urban JF Jr., Stadecker MJ, Gause WC. Protective immune mechanisms in helminth infection. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7: 975–987. 10.1038/nri2199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Allen JE, Maizels RM. Diversity and dialogue in immunity to helminths. Nat Rev Immunol. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;11: 375–388. 10.1038/nri2992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kreider T, Anthony RM, Urban JF Jr, Gause WC. Alternatively activated macrophages in helminth infections. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19: 448–453. 10.1016/j.coi.2007.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grencis RK. Immunity to helminths: Resistance, regulation, and susceptibility to gastrointestinal nematodes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33: 201–225. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grencis RK, Humphreys NE, Bancroft AJ. Immunity to gastrointestinal nematodes: mechanisms and myths. Immunol Rev. 2014;260: 183–205. 10.1111/imr.12188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Falcone FH, Pritchard DI. Parasite role reversal: worms on trial. Trends Parasitol. 2005;21: 157–160. 10.1016/j.pt.2005.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Djuranovic S, Nahvi A, Green R. miRNA-mediated gene silencing by translational repression followed by mRNA deadenylation and decay. Science (80-). 2012;336: 237–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116: 281–297. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kelada S, Sethupathy P, Okoye IS, Kistasis E, Czieso S, White SD, et al. miR-182 and miR-10a are key regulators of Treg specialisation and stability during Schistosome and Leishmania-associated inflammation. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9: e1003451 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Okoye IS, Czieso S, Ktistaki E, Roderick K, Coomes SM, Pelly VS, et al. Transcriptomics identified a critical role for Th2 cell-intrinsic miR-155 in mediating allergy and antihelminth immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111: e3081–90. 10.1073/pnas.1406322111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bird AP, Wolffe AP. Methylation-induced repression-belts, braces, and chromatin. Cell. 1999;99: 451–454. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81532-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zuloaga J, Rodríguez-Bobada C, Corcuera MT, Gómez-Aguado F, González P, Rodríguez-Perez R, et al. A rat model of intragastric infection with Anisakis spp. live larvae: histopathological study. Parasitol Res. 2013;112: 2409–2411. 10.1007/s00436-013-3359-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.del Pozo V, Arrieta I, Tuñon T, Cortegano I, Gomez B, Cárdaba B, et al. Immunopathogenesis of human gastrointestinal infection by Anisakis simplex. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104: 637–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bušelić I, Trumbić Ž, Hrabar J, Vrbatović A, Bočina I, Mladineo I. Molecular and cellular response to experimental Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda, Anisakidae) third-stage larval infection in rats. Front Immunol. 2018; 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu H, Rhodes M, Wiest DL, Vignali DAA. On the dynamics of TCR:CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. Immunity. 2000;13: 665–675. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00066-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bogdan C. Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nat Immunol. 2001;2: 907–16. 10.1038/ni1001-907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Foell D, Wittkowski H, Vogl T, Roth J. S100 proteins expressed in phagocytes: a novel group of damage-associated molecular pattern molecules. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;81: 28–37. 10.1189/jlb.0306170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Reynolds ES. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963;17: 208–212. 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lepen Pleić I, Secombes CJ, Bird S, Mladineo I. Characterization of three pro-inflammatory cytokines, TNFα1, TNFα2 and IL-1β, in cage-reared Atlantic bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014;36: 98–112. 10.1016/j.fsi.2013.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper-Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004;26: 509–15. 10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: e115 10.1093/nar/gks596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43: e47 10.1093/nar/gkv007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2017; [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis New York: Springer-Verlag New York; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Liaw WHA, Lumly T, et al. gplots: various R programming tools for plotting data. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Corcuera MT, Rodríguez-Bobada C, Zuloaga J, Gómez-Aguado F, Rodríguez-Perez R, Mendizabal Á, et al. Exploring tumourigenic potential of the parasite Anisakis: a pilot study. Parasitol Res. Parasitology Research; 2018;117: 3127–3136. 10.1007/s00436-018-6008-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Morris SR, Sakanari JA. Characterization of the serine protease and serine protease inhibitor from the tissue-penetrating nematode Anisakis simplex. J Bilogical Chem. 1994;269: 27650–27656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Proskuryakov SY, Konoplyannikov AG, Gabai VL. Necrosis: a specific form of programmed cell death? Exp Cell Res. 2003;283: 1–16. 10.1016/S0014-4827(02)00027-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Huang L, Appleton JA. Eosinophils in helminth infection: defenders and dupes. Trends Parasitol. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;32: 798–807. 10.1016/j.pt.2016.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pampiglione S, Rivasi F, Criscuolo M, Benedittis A De, Gentile A, Russo S, et al. Human anisakiasis in Italy: A report of eleven new cases. Pathol Res Pract. 2002;198: 429–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Geering B, Stoeckle C, Conus S, Simon H-U. Living and dying for inflammation: neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils. Trends Immunol. 2013;34: 398–409. 10.1016/j.it.2013.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jones HR, Robb CT, Perretti M, Rossi AG. The role of neutrophils in inflammation resolution. Semin Immunol. 2016;28: 137–145. 10.1016/j.smim.2016.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8: 958–969. 10.1038/nri2448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Anthony RM, Urban JF Jr, Alem F, Hamed HA, Rozo CT, Boucher J, et al. Memory TH2 cells induce alternatively activated macrophages to mediate protection against nematode parasites. Nat Med. 2006;12: 955–960. 10.1038/nm1451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bonne-Année S, Kerepesi LA, Hess JA, O’Connell AE, Lok JB, Nolan TJ, et al. Human and mouse macrophages collaborate with neutrophils to kill larval Strongyloides stercoralis. Infect Immun. 2013;81: 3346–3355. 10.1128/IAI.00625-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gazzinelli-Guimarães PH, Gazzinelli-Guimarães AC, Silva FN, Mati VLT, Dhom-Lemos L de C, Barbosa FS, et al. Parasitological and immunological aspects of early Ascaris spp. infection in mice. Internatonal J Parasitol. 2013;43: 697–706. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sawant D V., Gravano DM, Vogel P, Giacomin P, Artis D, Vignali DAA. Regulatory T cells limit induction of protective immunity and promote immune pathology following intestinal helminth infection. J Immunol. 2014;192: 2904–2912. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Della Bella C, Benagiano M, De Gennaro M, Gomez-Morales MA, Ludovisi A, D’Elios S, et al. T cell clones in human trichinellosis: evidence for a mixed Th1/Th2 response. Parasite Immunol. 2017;39: 0–1. 10.1111/ijlh.12426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gonzalez-Muñoz M, Rodriguez-Mahillo AI, Moneo I. Different Th1/Th2 responses to Anisakis simplex are related to distinct clinical manifestations in sensitized patients. Parasite Immunol. 2010;32: 67–73. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01162.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.De Trez C, Magez S, Akira S, Ryffel B, Carlier Y, Muraille E. iNOS-producing inflammatory dendritic cells constitute the major infected cell type during the chronic Leishmania major infection phase of C57BL/6 resistant mice. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5: e1000494 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Alonso-Trujillo J, Rivera-Montoya I, Rodríguez-Sosa M, Terrazas LI. Nitric oxide contributes to host resistance against experimental Taenia crassiceps cysticercosis. Parasitol Res. 2007;100: 1341–1350. 10.1007/s00436-006-0424-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yang Q-L, Shen J-Q, Xue Y, Cheng X-B, Jiang Z-H, Yang Y-C, et al. Pathological lesions and inducible nitric oxide synthase expressions in the liver of mice experimentally infected with Clonorchis sinensis. Korean J Parasitol. 2015;53: 777–783. 10.3347/kjp.2015.53.6.777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Colasanti M, Gradoni L, Mattu M, Persichini T, Salvati L, Venturini G, et al. Molecular bases for the anti-parasitic effect of NO (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2002;9: 131–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Boczon K, Wandurska-Nowak E, Wierzbicki A, Frydrychowicz M, Mozer-Lisewska I, Zeromski J. mRNA expression and immunohistochemical localization of inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS-2) in the muscular niche of Trichinella spiralis. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2004;42: 209–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schiopu A, Cotoi OS. S100A8 and S100A9: DAMPs at the crossroads between innate immunity, traditional risk factors, and cardiovascular disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013 10.1155/2013/828354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ryckman C, Vandal K, Rouleau P, Talbot M, Tessier PA. Proinflammatory activities of S100: proteins S100A8, S100A9, and S100A8/A9 induce neutrophil chemotaxis and adhesion. J Immunol. 2003;170: 3233–3242. 10.4049/jimmunol.170.6.3233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Viemann D, Barczyk K, Vogl T, Fischer U, Sunderkötter C, Schulze-Osthoff K, et al. MRP8/MRP14 impairs endothelial integrity and induces a caspase-dependent and -independent cell death program. Blood. 2007;109: 2453–2460. 10.1182/blood-2006-08-040444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Curran CS, Bertics PJ. Human eosinophils express RAGE, produce RAGE ligands, exhibit PKC-delta phosphorylation and enhanced viability in response to the RAGE ligand. Int Immunol. 2011;23: 713–728. 10.1093/intimm/dxr083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Averill MM, Kerkhoff C, Bornfeldt KE. S100A8 and S100A9 in cardiovascular biology and disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32: 223–229. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.236927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Karadjian G, Fercoq F, Pionnier N, Vallarino-Lhermitte N, Lefoulon E, Nieguitsila A, et al. Migratory phase of Litomosoides sigmodontis filarial infective larvae is associated with pathology and transient increase of S100A9 expressing neutrophils in the lung. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: 1–25. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Alvarez Rojas CA, Ansell BR, Hall RS, Gasser RB, Young ND, Jex AR, et al. Transcriptional analysis identifies key genes involved in metabolism, fibrosis/tissue repair and the immune response against Fasciola hepatica in sheep liver. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8: 124 10.1186/s13071-015-0715-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Page-McCaw A, Ewald AJ, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8: 221–233. 10.1038/nrm2125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Angele MK, Knöferl MW, Ayala A, Albina JE, Cioffi WG, Bland KI, et al. Trauma-hemorrhage delays wound healing potentially by increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines at the wound site. Surgery. 1999;126: 279–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mancuso P. The role of adipokines in chronic inflammation. ImmunoTargets Ther. 2016;5: 47 10.2147/ITT.S73223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Desruisseaux MS, Nagajyothi, Trujillo ME, Tanowitz HB, Scherer PE. Adipocyte, adipose tissue, and infectious disease. Infect Immun. 2007;75: 1066–1078. 10.1128/IAI.01455-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bouloumié A, Sengene C, Portolan G, Galitzky J, Lafontan M. Adipocyte produces matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9. Diabetes. 2001;50: 2080–2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Delclaux C, Delacourt C, D’Ortho M-P, Boyer V, Lafuma C, Harf A. Role of gelatinase B and elastase in human polymorphonuclear neutrophil migration across basement membrane. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1996;14: 288–295. 10.1165/ajrcmb.14.3.8845180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Netea MG, Simon A, Van De Veerdonk F, Kullberg BJ, Van Der Meer JWM, Joosten LAB. IL-1β processing in host defense: beyond the inflammasomes. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6: e1000661 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Alhallaf R, Agha Z, Miller CM, Robertson AAB, Sotillo J, Croese J, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome suppresses protective immunity to gastrointestinal helminth infection. Cell Rep. 2018;23: 1085–1098. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kaplanski G. Interleukin-18: Biological properties and role in disease pathogenesis. Immunol Rev. 2018;281: 138–153. 10.1111/imr.12616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Helmby H, Grencis RK. IL-18 regulates intestinal mastocytosis and Th2 cytokine production independently of IFN- γ during Trichinella spiralis infection. J Immunol. 2002;169: 2553–2560. 10.4049/jimmunol.169.5.2553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ding J, Bai X, Wang X, Shi H, Cai X, Luo X, et al. Immune cell responses and cytokine profile in intestines of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8: 1–Article 2069. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zaiss MM, Maslowski KM, Mosconi I, Guenat N, Marsland BJ, Harris NL. IL-1β Suppresses innate IL-25 and IL-33 production and maintains helminth chronicity. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9: e1003531 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Helmby H, Grencis RK. Interleukin-1 plays a major role in the development of Th2-mediated immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34: 3674–3681. 10.1002/eji.200425452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Scheller J, Chalaris A, Schmidt-Arras D, Rose-John S. The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. Biochim Biophyisca Acta. 2011;1813: 878–888. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Smith KA, Maizels RM. IL-6 controls susceptibility to helminth infection by impeding Th2 responsiveness and altering the Treg phenotype in vivo. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44: 150–161. 10.1002/eji.201343746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Davatelis G, Wolpe SD, Sherry B, Dayer J-M, Chicheportiche R, Cerami A. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1: a prostaglandin-independent endogenous pyrogen. Nature. 1988;243: 1066–1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sarelius IH, Glading AJ. Control of vascular permeability by adhesion molecules. Tissue Barriers. 2015;3: 37–41. 10.4161/21688370.2014.985954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yang L, Froio RM, Sciuto TE, Dvorak AM, Alon R, Luscinskas FW. ICAM-1 regulates neutrophil adhesion and transcellular migration of TNF-a–activated vascular endothelium under flow. Blood. 2005;106: 584–593. 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Napoletano C, Mattiucci S, Colantoni A, Battisti F, Zizzari IG, Rahimi H, et al. Anisakis pegreffii impacts differentiation and function of human dendritic cells. Parasite Immunol. 2018;40: 1–12. 10.1111/pim.12527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Chapman LM, Ture SK, Field DJ, Morrell CN. miR-451 limits CD4+ T cell proliferative responses to infection in mice. Immunol Res. Immunologic Research; 2017; 828–840. 10.1007/s12026-017-8919-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Murata K, Yoshitomi H, Furu M, Ishikawa M, Shibuya H, Ito H, et al. MicroRNA-451 down-regulates neutrophil chemotaxis via p38 MAPK. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66: 549–559. 10.1002/art.38269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rosenberger CM, Podyminogin RL, Navarro G, Zhao G-W, Askovich PS, Weiss MJ, et al. miR-451 regulates dendritic cell cytokine responses to influenza infection. J Immunol. 2012;189: 5965–5975. 10.4049/jimmunol.1201437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Dorhoi A, Iannaccone M, Farinacci M, Faé KC, Schreiber J, Moura-Alves P, et al. MicroRNA-223 controls susceptibility to tuberculosis by regulating lung neutrophil recruitment. J Clin Invest. 2013;123: 4836–4848. 10.1172/JCI67604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Neudecker V, Haneklaus M, Jensen O, Khailova L, Masterson JC, Tye H, et al. Myeloid-derived miR-223 regulates intestinal inflammation via repression of the NLRP3 inflammasome. J Exp Med. 2017;214: 1737–1752. 10.1084/jem.20160462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Chen Q, Wang H, Liu Y, Song Y, Lai L, Han Q, et al. Inducible microRNA-223 down-regulation promotes TLR-triggered IL-6 and IL-1β production in macrophages by targeting STAT3. PLoS One. 2012;7: 1–12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Garbacki N, Di Valentin E, Huynh-Thu VA, Geurts P, Irrthum A, Crahay C, et al. MicroRNAs profiling in murine models of acute and chronic asthma: a relationship with mRNAs targets. PLoS One. 2011;6: e16509 10.1371/journal.pone.0016509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Tahara T., Arisawa T. DNA methylation as a molecular biomarker in gastric cancer. Epigenomics. 2015;7: 475–486. 10.2217/epi.15.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Conti SL, Honeycutt J, Odegaard JI, Gonzalgo ML, Hsieh MH. Alterations in DNA methylation may be the key to early detection and treatment of schistosomal bladder cancer. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: 2–7. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Petithory JC, Burroughs AK, Paugam B, Buyet-Rousset P, Paugam A. Anisakis simplex, a co-factor of gastric cancer? Lancet. 1990;336: 1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Sonoda H, Yamamoto K, Ozeki K, Inoye H, Toda S, Maehara Y. An anisakis larva attached to early gastric cancer: report of a case. Surg Today. 2014;45: 1321–1325. 10.1007/s00595-014-1012-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. List of samples used for each downstream analysis.

(PHD-classic histopathology; IF-immunofluorescence; TEM-transmission electron microscopy; miRNA-miRNA profiling; TGE-target gene expression; DNAm-DNA methylation)

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Representative micrographs showing uninfected tissue controls.

(A) Stomach, cardiac region; (B) Stomach, body, greater curvature; (C) Intestine; (D) Muscle. HE, scale bar = 200 μm.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Representative micrographs of CD3 immunolabeling of uninfected control tissue.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (C, D, E) Intestine; (E, F, G) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar: (A, B, C, G, H, I) = 20 μm, (D, E, F) = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Representative micrographs of negative stain control for CD3 antibody.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (D, E, F) Intestine; (G, H, I) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Representative micrographs of iNOS immunolabeling of uninfected control tissue.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (C, D, E) Intestine; (E, F, G) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Representative micrographs of negative stain control for iNOS antibody.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (D, E, F) Intestine; (G, H, I) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Representative micrographs of S100A8/A9 (MRP8+MRP14) immunolabeling of uninfected control tissue.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (C, D, E) Intestine; (E, F, G) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Representative micrographs of negative stain control for S100A8/A9 (MRP8+MRP9) antibody.

(A, B, C) Stomach; (D, E, F) Intestine; (G, H, I) Muscle. Immunofluorescence, scale bar = 10 μm.

(TIF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES