Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 May 28;9:7964. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44399-6

Cytotoxicity of trifluridine correlates with the thymidine kinase 1 expression level

Yuki Kataoka 1,2, Makoto Iimori 1,✉, Shinichiro Niimi 3, Hiroshi Tsukihara 4, Takeshi Wakasa 1,4, Hiroshi Saeki 5, Eiji Oki 5, Yoshihiko Maehara 5,6, Hiroyuki Kitao 1,3
PMCID: PMC6538667  PMID: 31138881

Abstract

Trifluridine (FTD), a tri-fluorinated thymidine analogue, is a key component of the oral antitumor drug FTD/TPI (also known as TAS-102), which is used to treat refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) is thought to be important for the incorporation of FTD into DNA, resulting in DNA dysfunction and cytotoxicity. However, it remains unknown whether TK1 is essential for FTD incorporation into DNA and whether this event is affected by the expression level of TK1 because TK1-specific-deficient human cancer cell lines have not been established. Here, we generated TK1-knock-out human colorectal cancer cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system and validated the specificity of TK1 knock-out by measuring expression of AFMID, which is encoded on the same locus as TK1. Using TK1-knock-out cells, we confirmed that TK1 is essential for cellular sensitivity to FTD. Furthermore, we demonstrated a correlation between the TK1 expression level and cytotoxicity of FTD using cells with inducible TK1 expression, which were generated from TK1-knock-out cells. Based on our finding that the TK1 expression level correlates with sensitivity to FTD, we suggest that FTD/TPI might efficiently treat cancers with high TK1 expression.

Subject terms: Chemotherapy, DNA metabolism

Introduction

Trifluridine (FTD), a tri-fluorinated thymidine analogue, is a key component of the novel oral antitumor drug FTD/TPI (also known as TAS-102), which is used to treat refractory metastatic colorectal cancer based on an international phase III clinical trial1. The tri-phosphorylated form of FTD2 is thought to be incorporated into DNA through its replication during S phase2–4, resulting in DNA dysfunction and cytotoxicity.

Thymidine kinase 1 (encoded by TK15) is a cytosolic nucleoside kinase that is part of the thymidine salvage pathway and mainly phosphorylates thymidine6,7. Based on its chemical structure, FTD is thought to be phosphorylated by TK1 and this modification is suggested to be essential for its cytotoxicity. Indeed, TK1 seems to be associated with the cytotoxicity of FTD8,9; however, the cell lines used in these previous reports were generated by random mutagenesis and not fully validated. Furthermore, although TK1-deficient cells play a key role in determining the importance of TK1 for FTD cytotoxicity, TK1-specific-deficient human cancer cell lines have not been established.

This study generated TK1-specific-knock-out human colorectal cancer cell lines and demonstrated that TK1 is essential for cellular sensitivity to FTD. Moreover, we provide the first evidence that the TK1 expression level correlates with FTD sensitivity.

Results

TK1 expression is indispensable for FTD cytotoxicity

We first examined the relationship between TK1 expression and FTD sensitivity in a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines. The TK1 expression level varied among the cell lines; however, there was no correlation between TK1 expression and FTD sensitivity (Fig. S1A,B). To exclude the possibility that differences in the genetic background among these cell lines influenced the results, we knocked down TK1 to validate its importance for FTD cytotoxicity. Although TK1-knock-down cells tended to have a reduced sensitivity to FTD, it was not markedly different from that of control cells (Fig. S1C–F). To overcome this, we generated TK1-specific-knock-out HCT 116 human colorectal cancer cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system. We used a knock-in strategy to generate these cells. Specifically, the TK1 gene was targeted at two sites in exons 1 and 4, respectively (Fig. 1A), and puromycin resistance gene cassettes were integrated into the genome via homologous recombination (Fig. 1B). We obtained two puromycin-resistant HCT 116 cell lines; exon 1 was targeted in HCT 116/TK1KO ex.1 cells and exon 4 was targeted in HCT 116/TK1KO ex.4 cells. TK1 protein expression was completely abolished in both cell lines (Fig. 1C). To evaluate FTD sensitivity, HCT 116 parental and TK1-knock-out cells were treated with a dilution series of FTD comprising nine concentrations for 3 days and then their viability was determined. The HCT 116/TK1KO cell lines were more than 100-fold less sensitive to FTD than HCT 116 parental cells (Fig. 1D, Supplementary Table 1). The growth curve, doubling time (Fig. S2A), and cell cycle distribution (Fig. S2B) of HCT 116/TK1KO cells were similar to those of HCT 116 parental cells; therefore, the difference in FTD sensitivity between these two cell lines was due to their disparate TK1 expression levels. TK1-knock-out RKO cells were also resistant to FTD (Fig. S3). Furthermore, a recent study reported a similar finding in TK1-knock-out DLD-1 cells10, suggesting that TK1 is essential for FTD cytotoxicity in a range of cell lines.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

FTD cytotoxicity in TK1-knock-out cells. (A) Schematic diagram of the TK1 locus on Chr17q25.3. Exons are denoted by black rectangles and introns are shown in light grey. (B) Experimental scheme of TK1 knock-out. Three PCR fragments, 600–700 base pairs of the right and left homology arms and a puromycin resistance cassette, were cloned into pBluescript SK+. (C) Western blot analysis of TK1 protein (left) and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of TK1 mRNA (right) in HCT 116 parental and TK1-knock-out cells. Expression of TK1 was normalised against that of β-actin and is plotted relative to that in HCT 116 parental cells. Data are means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability assay. Cells were treated with nine points of dilution series of FTD for 3 days and then their viability was determined. The viability of cells not treated with FTD was defined as 100%. Data are means ± s.d. of three independent experiments.

TK1 knock-out does not affect AFMID expression

TK1 and AFMID, which encodes arylformamidase (Afmid, also known as kynurenine formamidase), are located on the same locus (17q25.3) and transcribed in opposite directions (Fig. 2A). Hence, knock-out of TK1 might affect expression of AFMID. Indeed, although TK1-knock-out mice have been reported and exhibit kidney failure11, they do not express any native Afmid mRNA, and Afmid-specific activity is reduced to 0.1% in the liver12. Concurrent knock-out of two genes makes it difficult to determine which is responsible for the phenotype. Therefore, it was important to ensure that TK1 was knocked out without affecting expression of AFMID. We first analysed AFMID expression in the TK1-knock-out cell lines. Expression of AFMID was approximately 30% lower in HCT 116/TK1KO ex.1 and HCT 116/TK1KO ex.4 cells than in HCT 116 parental cells (Fig. 2B). We hypothesised that AFMID expression may vary between individual cells of the HCT 116 parental line and that we selected clones with lower AFMID expression when generating the TK1-knock-out cell lines. To test this hypothesis, we isolated individual HCT 116 cells from the parental line by limiting dilution and analysed AFMID expression in each clone. The AFMID expression level varied between these clones (Fig. 2C), indicating that the expression level of AFMID in HCT 116 parental cells is an average of that in each individual cell. Alternatively, insertion of the puromycin resistance cassettes may have affected AFMID expression. To exclude this possibility, we investigated whether the AFMID expression level changed after removing the puromycin resistance cassettes from the TK1 loci by Cre-loxP recombination. Removal of these cassettes did not affect AFMID expression (Fig. 2D). Therefore, the reduced AFMID expression in the TK1-knock-out cell lines was due to clonal variation, not to insertion of the puromycin resistance cassettes into the TK1 loci. Thus, we conclude that TK1-specific-knock-out cell lines can be generated without affecting expression of AFMID.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

AFMID expression in TK1-knock-out cells. (A) Schematic diagram around the TK1 locus on Chr17. (B–D) Expression of AFMID was determined by quantitative RT-PCR, normalised against that of β-actin and plotted relative to that in HCT 116 cells. (B) TK1-knock-out cell lines. (C) Cloned HCT 116 cell lines. (D) The HCT 116/TK1KO ex.4 cell line and its clones whose puromycin resistance cassettes were removed by the Cre-loxP recombination system. Data are means ± s.d. of three independent experiments.

The TK1 expression level correlates with FTD incorporation and cytotoxicity

The relationship between TK1 knock-out and cytotoxicity of FTD was described above (Fig. 1); however, it was unknown whether FTD cytotoxicity correlates with the expression level of TK1. To address this question, we first examined FTD cytotoxicity in TK1-overexpressing RKO cells, in which basal expression of TK1 was low (Fig. S1A). TK1-overexpressing RKO cells did not exhibit increased sensitivity to FTD, suggesting that an excess amount of TK1 protein does not enhance FTD sensitivity (Fig. 3A,B). We next investigated whether the TK1 expression level correlates with FTD cytotoxicity when expression of TK1 is lower than the endogenous level. To this end, we generated cells with inducible TK1 expression (hereafter referred to as HCT 116/TK1tet and RKO/TK1tet cells), in which TK1 expression was induced by doxycycline treatment, using TK1-knock-out cells. In these cells, TK1 expression was efficiently induced by treatment with doxycycline for 1 day, and the expression level correlated well with the concentration of doxycycline (Figs 3C,D and S4A). The expression level of TK1 plateaued at 1000 ng/ml doxycycline and was about one-half of that in HCT 116 parental cells. Without doxycycline treatment, HCT 116/TK1tet cell lines were resistant to FTD, similar to TK1-knock-out cells (Figs 3E and S4B). Furthermore, the effect of doxycycline on TK1 expression persisted for 4 days (Figs 3F and S4C), meaning TK1 expression was sustained throughout all experiments. HCT 116/TK1tet cell lines grew slightly slower than HCT 116/TK1KO ex.4 and HCT 116 parental cells (Fig. S2A). This might be caused by stable integration of the TK1 expression-inducible plasmids. Doxycycline did not affect the growth (Fig. S2A) or cell cycle distribution (Fig. S2B) of any cell line per se.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Correlation between the TK1 expression level and FTD incorporation or cytotoxicity. (A,B) Lysates of RKO cells stably expressing TK1 were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies (A). Cells were treated with a dilution series of FTD comprising nine concentrations for 3 days and then their viability was determined. The viability of cells not treated with FTD was defined as 100%. Data are means ± s.d. of three independent experiments (B). (C,D) Western blot analysis (C) and quantification (D) of TK1 protein. Cells were treated with the indicated concentration of doxycycline for 1 day and the TK1 protein level was analysed. The intensity of the TK1 band was normalised against that of the β-actin band. The relative intensity of the TK1 band was calculated by setting that in cells not treated with doxycycline to 100%. Data are means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. (E) FTD sensitivity of cells with inducible TK1 expression. HCT 116/TK1tet cl. 1 cells were treated with the indicated concentration of FTD for 3 days and then their viability was evaluated. Relative cell viability was calculated by setting that of cells not treated with FTD to 100%. Data are means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. (F) Western blot analysis of TK1. Cells were treated with the indicated concentration of doxycycline for the indicated number of days. (G) Immunofluorescence images of FTD-incorporated cells (left). Cells were treated with the indicated concentration of doxycycline for 1 day and then with 6.4 μM FTD for 1 h, fixed and immunostained with an anti-BrdU antibody. Fluorescence intensities of FTD incorporated into genomic DNA were quantified (right). Scale bar, 100 μm. (H) FTD sensitivity of cells. HCT 116 parental cells, TK1-knock-out cells and cells with inducible TK1 expression were treated with the indicated concentration of doxycycline for 1 day and then with nine points of dilution series of FTD for 3 days. The IC50 values in each cell line at the indicated concentration of doxycycline were calculated and plotted. Data are means ± s.d. of three independent experiments.

To evaluate whether FTD was incorporated into genomic DNA of HCT 116/TK1KO ex.4 or HCT 116/TK1tet cell lines, we treated these cells with 6.4 μM FTD, which was the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) when HCT 116 parental cells were treated with FTD for 3 days without doxycycline (Fig. 1D and Supplementary Table 1), for 1 h and analysed the amount of incorporated FTD. Consistent with our previous report13, FTD was rapidly incorporated into nuclear DNA in HCT 116 parental cells, whereas it was hardly detectable in TK1-knock-out cells, and these results were not affected by addition of doxycycline (Fig. 3G). In HCT 116/TK1tet cell lines, the amount of incorporated FTD correlated with the doxycycline concentration (Figs 3G, S4D and Supplementary Table 2). These data indicate that the amount of FTD incorporated into nuclear DNA depends on the TK1 expression level. As described above, TK1-expressing cells were sensitive to FTD, whereas TK1-knock-out cells were highly resistant to FTD (Figs 1D, 3B and S4B). Next, we investigated whether FTD cytotoxicity is dependent on the TK1 expression level. To compare FTD sensitivity between cell lines, we calculated IC50 values in the presence of various concentrations of doxycycline. While doxycycline did not affect FTD cytotoxicity in HCT 116 parental or TK1-knock-out cells, FTD sensitivity correlated well with the doxycycline concentration in HCT 116/TK1tet cell lines (Figs 3H, S4E and Supplementary Table 1). FTD sensitivity also correlated with the doxycycline concentration in RKO/TK1tet cell lines (Fig. S4F,G). These results indicate that the TK1 expression level highly correlates with cellular sensitivity to FTD in an isogenic background.

Discussion

Previous reports indicate that TK1 is indispensable for FTD cytotoxicity8,9; however, the cells used were not certified to be specifically TK1-deficient. In this study, for the first time, we generated TK1-specific-knock-out human cancer cell lines using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system and then obtained cell lines with inducible TK1 expression. Using these cells, we confirmed that TK1 was essential for cellular sensitivity to FTD. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the TK1 expression level correlated with FTD sensitivity.

Although TK1-knock-out mice have been reported, they are also deficient in Afmid, a formamidase that is part of the tryptophan catabolism pathway11,12. TK1 and AFMID are located on the same locus; therefore, knock-out of TK1 may affect expression of AFMID. Simultaneous knock-out of two genes hinders elucidation of the function of each gene. Considering the potential influence on AFMID expression, we targeted exon 4 of TK1 to generate TK1-knock-out cells. These cells did not exhibit changes in growth, cell cycle distribution, or AFMID expression. Thus, we conclude that the phenotypes of TK1-knock-out cells were due to their lack of TK1 expression. In comparison with HCT 116 parental cells, TK1-knock-out cells were highly resistant to FTD. This demonstrated that TK1 expression was indispensable for FTD to exert cytotoxicity and excluded the possibility that AFMID was involved in FTD cytotoxicity.

We found no correlation between TK1 expression and FTD sensitivity in a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines. Furthermore, overexpression of TK1 did not increase the sensitivity of cells to FTD. Other factors, in addition to the TK1 expression level, might determine FTD sensitivity. Indeed, nucleoside transporters (hENT1, hENT2 and hCNT1)13–16 contribute to FTD cytotoxicity. Furthermore, nucleoside kinases, such as TMPK and NDK, are predicted to be involved in FTD phosphorylation. Hence, overexpression of TK1 alone is insufficient to increase the sensitivity of cells to FTD. On the other hand, doxycycline-inducible expression of TK1 increased FTD sensitivity in a doxycycline dose-dependent manner in cells with the same genetic background as TK1-knock-out cells. These results strongly indicate that the TK1 expression level highly correlates with cellular cytotoxicity to FTD in an isogenic background because the TK1 expression level was dependent on the doxycycline concentration and doxycycline did not affect cell growth or the cell cycle. Together, these data suggest that FTD would more effectively treat cancers with high TK1 expression than those with low TK1 expression.

It was reported that thymidine kinase activity is higher in the tumour than in normal tissue from the same patient17. Furthermore, several studies report that high expression of TK1 significantly correlates with poor prognosis in various types of cancer, and the TK1 expression level is thus considered to be a prognostic factor18–22. Cancers that highly express TK1 may be efficiently treated with FTD/TPI. Indeed, recent studies discussed the importance of the TK1 expression level as a predictive factor of FTD/TPI efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients23,24. Future studies should determine the expression levels of TK1 in clinical specimens of various types of cancer. These findings are expected to help determine which types of cancer are particularly susceptible to FTD/TPI treatment.

Methods

Cell culture and reagents

HCT 116 (ECACC; 91091005), HCT 116 (ATCC; CCL-247), HT-29 (ATCC; HTB-38), LoVo (ATCC; CCL-229), LS1034 (ATCC; CRL-2158), LS411N (ATCC; CRL-2159), RKO (ATCC; CRL-2577), SW48 (ATCC; CCL-231) and SW480 (ATCC; CCL-228) cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 4 mM L-glutamine and 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and supplemented with 10% Tet-tested foetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque) at 37 °C in 5% CO2. FTD was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry. Doxycycline was purchased from Takara-Clontech. All reagents were solubilized in distilled water. TK1-specific siRNA was synthesized by Thermo Fisher Scientific and the sequence is provided in Supplementary Table 3.

In RNAi experiments, Stealth RNAi Negative Control Med GC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used as a control and siRNA was transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Plasmid construction

To knock-out TK1 using the CRISPR/ Cas9 genome editing system, guide RNA (gRNA) sequences were designed using the online software CRISPRdirect25. The targeting sequences of gRNAs are provided in Fig. 1A and Supplementary Table 3. The sense and antisense oligonucleotides were annealed and cloned into the BbsI site of pX330-U6-Chimeric_BB-CBh-hSpCas9 (Addgene plasmid #42230), which was a gift from Feng Zhang26. To construct donor vectors by PCR, template DNA (genomic DNA of HCT 116 cells) was amplified using KOD FX DNA polymerase (TOYOBO) and primers containing a sequence homologous to the target locus, which are provided in Supplementary Table 3. The amplified left- and right-arm DNA fragments, which contained approximately 600–700 base pairs homologous to the target locus, and a puromycin resistance cassette were cloned into the BamHI–NotI site of pBluescript SK+ using an In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara-Clontech). To construct the stable and inducible TK1 expression plasmids, the TK1 gene was amplified from template DNA (total cDNA of HCT 116 cells) using KOD FX DNA polymerase (TOYOBO) and primers (Supplementary Table 3), and then cloned into the pcDNA3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and pTetOne (Takara-Clontech) vectors using an In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara-Clontech), respectively.

Generation of TK1-knock-out cell lines and cell lines with stable and inducible TK1 expression

To establish TK1-knock-out cells, HCT 116 and RKO cells were co-transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 vector and a donor vector. Forty-eight hours later, cells were selected with 500 ng/ml puromycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The puromycin resistance cassettes integrated into the TK1 loci were removed by the Cre-loxP recombination system (Fig. 2B). Cre recombinase proteins were delivered into TK1-knock-out cells using Cre Recombinase Gesicles (Takara-Clontech). To establish cells with stable TK1 expression, RKO cells were transfected with the pcDNA3.1-TK1 plasmid. Forty-eight hours later, cells were selected with 500 μg/ml G418 (Geneticin; Thermo Fisher Scientific). To establish cells with inducible TK1 expression, TK1-knock-out HCT 116 and RKO cells were co-transfected with a 50:1 ratio of pTetOne-TK1:linear hygromycin marker, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Takara-Clontech). Forty-eight hours later, cells were selected with 400 μg/ml hygromycin B (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All transfections were carried out using the 4D Nucleofector system (Lonza).

Western blotting

Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1.0% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate] containing 1 mM PMSF and appropriate concentrations of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque) and a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque). Cell extracts were clarified by centrifugation. The supernatant was boiled in SDS sample buffer (Nacalai Tesque). An ImageQuant LAS-4000 mini system (GE Healthcare) was used to detect chemiluminescence. Signal intensities were quantified using ImageQuant TL software (GE Healthcare). The following antibodies were used at the indicated dilutions: anti-TK1 (1:5000; clone EPR3193, Abcam) and anti-β-actin (1:10,000; clone AC-74, Sigma). Images were cropped for presentation. Uncropped immunoblots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 5.

Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from each cell line using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized with a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) using the primers provided in Supplementary Table 3. mRNA expression was normalised against that of β-actin. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed with a QuantiFast SYBRGreen PCR Kit (Qiagen). Fluorescence signals were detected by a LightCycler 480 system (Roche Diagnostics).

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was evaluated by the CellTiter-Glo 2.0 Assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were plated in a 96-well plate at a density of 500 cells per well in 100 μl of growth medium. The next day, 50 μl of growth medium containing 3x final concentration of doxycycline was added to each well. One day later, 50 μl of medium containing 4x final concentration of FTD and the final concentration of doxycycline was added. Three days later, 100 μl of culture medium was removed, 100 μl of CellTiter-Glo 2.0 Assay reagent was added and the sample was agitated to uniformly lyse cells. Luminescence was detected by a TriStar LB941 reader (Berthold Technologies). The ratio of the luminescence of each sample to that of the mock-treated sample was determined, and the IC50 value was calculated with XLfit (IDBS). The ‘dose response 205′ program was used for curve fitting. Each experiment was repeated three times. To determine the cell growth rate, the RealTime-Glo MT Cell Viability assay (Promega) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were treated with an appropriate concentration of MT Cell Viability Substrate and NanoLuc Enzyme. Luminescence was detected by a TriStar LB941 reader at 1 h and various other time points after cell plating.

Detection of FTD incorporated into nuclear DNA

FTD was detected as described in our previous report13. Briefly, cell seeding and addition of doxycycline and FTD were performed as described for the cell viability assay. One hour after FTD addition, cells were fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol for 5 min and treated with 1.5N HCl for 1 h. After blocking with goat serum, FTD was detected with an anti-BrdU antibody (1:250; clone 3D4; BD Biosciences). Samples were treated with an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:200; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1 μg/ml 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DOJINDO). Fluorescence was detected with a Cytell Cell Imaging System (GE Healthcare). Images were analysed using IN Cell Analyzer Workstation 3.7.1. The maximum fluorescence intensity in cells cultured without FTD was determined as the background. Outliers and signals less than the background were excluded. To calculate outliers, the upper quartile (Q3/4) and lower quartile (Q1/4) were first determined. Then, the interquartile range (IQR) was calculated as Q3/4–Q1/4. Data that were more than Q3/4 + 1.5 × IQR or less than Q1/4 − 1.5 × IQR were defined as outliers.

Cell cycle analysis

Cells were harvested by trypsinization after 1 day of doxycycline treatment, fixed with 70% ethanol and stained with propidium iodide. Fluorescence was analysed using a FACSCalibur instrument (BD Biosciences). The cell cycle was evaluated by DNA content analysis.

Supplementary information

Suppl info (10MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Naoko Katakura, Tomomi Takada, Masako Kosugi and Atsuko Yamaguchi for their expert technical assistance. We also appreciate the technical assistance from the Research Support Center, Research Center for Human Disease Modeling, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences. This study was supported in part by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (to H.K., JSPS KAKENHI grant number 17H03598) and by commercial grants of Shinnihon Foundation of Advanced Medical Treatment Research (to M.I.).

Author Contributions

Conception and design: M.I. and H.K. Development of methodology: Y.K., M.I., S.N. and H.T. Acquisition of data: Y.K., M.I., H.T. and S.N. Analysis and interpretation of data: Y.K., M.I., S.N., H.T. and H.K. Writing, review and/or revision of the manuscript: Y.K. and M.I. (writing); S.N., H.T. and T.W. (review and revision). Administrative, technical or material support: Y.M. Study supervision: M.I. Other (data discussion): T.W., H.S., E.O. and H.K.

Competing Interests

Y.K., H.T. and T.W. are employees of Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. M.I. and H.K. are staff at the Joint Research Department of Kyushu University funded by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. The authors declare that they have no competing non-financial interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-44399-6.

References

  • 1.Mayer RJ, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;372:1909–1919. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Emura T, et al. An optimal dosing schedule for a novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, based on its intracellular metabolism and its incorporation into DNA. International journal of molecular medicine. 2004;13:249–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Matsuoka K, et al. Trifluridine Induces p53-Dependent Sustained G2 Phase Arrest with Its Massive Misincorporation into DNA and Few DNA Strand Breaks. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2015;14:1004–1013. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tanaka N, et al. Repeated oral dosing of TAS-102 confers high trifluridine incorporation into DNA and sustained antitumor activity in mouse models. Oncology reports. 2014;32:2319–2326. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lin PF, Zhao SY, Ruddle FH. Genomic cloning and preliminary characterization of the human thymidine kinase gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1983;80:6528–6532. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.21.6528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eriksson S, Kierdaszuk B, Munch-Petersen B, Oberg B, Johansson NG. Comparison of the substrate specificities of human thymidine kinase 1 and 2 and deoxycytidine kinase toward antiviral and cytostatic nucleoside analogs. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1991;176:586–592. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johansson NG, Eriksson S. Structure-activity relationships for phosphorylation of nucleoside analogs to monophosphates by nucleoside kinases. Acta biochimica Polonica. 1996;43:143–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murakami Y, et al. Different mechanisms of acquired resistance to fluorinated pyrimidines in human colorectal cancer cells. International journal of oncology. 2000;17:277–283. doi: 10.3892/ijo.17.2.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Temmink OH, Comijn EM, Fukushima M, Peters GJ. Intracellular thymidylate synthase inhibition by trifluorothymidine in FM3A cells. Nucleosides, nucleotides &. nucleic acids. 2004;23:1491–1494. doi: 10.1081/NCN-200027707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Edahiro K, et al. Thymidine Kinase 1 Loss Confers Trifluridine Resistance without Affecting 5-Fluorouracil Metabolism and Cytotoxicity. Mol Cancer Res. 2018;16:1483–1490. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dobrovolsky VN, Bucci T, Heflich RH, Desjardins J, Richardson FC. Mice deficient for cytosolic thymidine kinase gene develop fatal kidney disease. Molecular genetics and metabolism. 2003;78:1–10. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7192(02)00224-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dobrovolsky VN, et al. Effect of arylformamidase (kynurenine formamidase) gene inactivation in mice on enzymatic activity, kynurenine pathway metabolites and phenotype. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2005;1724:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kitao H, et al. The antibodies against 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine specifically recognize trifluridine incorporated into. DNA. Scientific reports. 2016;6:25286. doi: 10.1038/srep25286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Takahashi K, Yoshisue K, Chiba M, Nakanishi T, Tamai I. Contribution of equilibrative nucleoside transporter(s) to intestinal basolateral and apical transports of anticancer trifluridine. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2018;39:38–46. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Takahashi K, Yoshisue K, Chiba M, Nakanishi T, Tamai I. Involvement of Concentrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 in Intestinal Absorption of Trifluridine Using Human Small Intestinal Epithelial Cells. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104:3146–3153. doi: 10.1002/jps.24455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sakamoto K, et al. Crucial roles of thymidine kinase 1 and deoxyUTPase in incorporating the antineoplastic nucleosides trifluridine and 2′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine into DNA. International journal of oncology. 2015;46:2327–2334. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gordon HL, Bardos TJ, Chmielewicz ZF, Ambrus JL. Comparative study of the thymidine kinase and thymidylate kinase activities and of the feedbach inhibition of thymidine kinase in normal and neoplastic human tissue. Cancer research. 1968;28:2068–2077. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.He Q, et al. Thymidine kinase 1 in serum predicts increased risk of distant or loco-regional recurrence following surgery in patients with early breast cancer. Anticancer research. 2006;26:4753–4759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kolberg M, et al. Protein expression of BIRC5, TK1, and TOP2A in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours–A prognostic test after surgical resection. Molecular oncology. 2015;9:1129–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang J, et al. Thymidine kinase 1 expression in ovarian serous adenocarcinoma is superior to Ki-67: A new prognostic biomarker. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2017;39:1010428317706479. doi: 10.1177/1010428317706479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xu Y, et al. Thymidine kinase 1 is a better prognostic marker than Ki-67 for pT1 adenocarcinoma of the lung. International journal of clinical and experimental medicine. 2014;7:2120–2128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xu Y, et al. High thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) expression is a predictor of poor survival in patients with pT1 of lung adenocarcinoma. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2012;33:475–483. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0276-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yoshino T, et al. Effect of thymidine kinase 1 expression on prognosis and treatment outcomes in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from two randomized studies of TAS-102 versus a placebo. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017;35:529–529. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yoshino T, et al. Relationship Between Thymidine Kinase 1 Expression and Trifluridine/Tipiracil Therapy in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Naito Y, Hino K, Bono H, Ui-Tei K. CRISPRdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1120–1123. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cong L, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339:819–823. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl info (10MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES