Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2019 May 28;10(3):e00713-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00713-19

A Substrate-Activated Efflux Pump, DesABC, Confers Zeamine Resistance to Dickeya zeae

Zhibin Liang a,b, Luhao Huang b, Fei He a,b, Xiaofan Zhou a,b, Zurong Shi a,b, Jianuan Zhou a,b, Yufan Chen a,b, Mingfa Lv b, Yumei Chen b, Lian-Hui Zhang a,b,
Editor: Susan Gottesmanc
Reviewed by: Martin Welchd, Vittorio Venturie
PMCID: PMC6538784  PMID: 31138747

Zeamines are a family of newly identified phytotoxins and potent antibiotics produced by D. zeae EC1. Unlike most bacterial organisms, which are highly sensitive, D. zeae EC1 is tolerant to zeamines, but the mechanisms involved are unknown. Our study showed, for the first time, that a new RND efflux pump, DesABC, is indispensable for D. zeae EC1 against zeamines. We found that the DesABC efflux pump was zeamine specific and appeared to be conserved only in the Dickeya species, which may explain the high potency of zeamines against a wide range of bacterial pathogens. We also showed that expression of DesABC efflux system genes was induced by zeamines. These findings not only provide an answer to why D. zeae EC1 is much more tolerant to zeamines than other bacterial pathogens but also document a signaling role of zeamines in modulation of gene expression.

KEYWORDS: RND efflux pump, antimicrobial resistance, phytotoxin, rice stem rot, zeamines

ABSTRACT

Zeamines are a family of polyamino phytotoxins produced by Dickeya zeae EC1. These phytotoxins are also potent antibiotics against a range of microorganisms. To understand how D. zeae EC1 can protect itself from the antimicrobial activity of zeamines, we tested whether the ABC transporter genes within the zms (zeamine synthesis) gene cluster were related to zeamine resistance. Our results ruled out the possible involvement of these ABC transporters in zeamine resistance and instead unveiled an RND (resistance-nodulation-cell division) efflux pump, DesABC, which plays an important role in zeamine resistance in D. zeae EC1. The desAB genes are located next to the zms gene cluster, but desC is at a distant location in the bacterial genome. Null mutation of the desABC genes in a zeamine-minus derivative of strain EC1 led to about an 8- to 32-fold decrease in zeamine tolerance level. This efflux pump was zeamine specific and appeared to be conserved only in Dickeya species, which may explain the high potency of zeamines against a wide range of bacterial pathogens. Significantly, expression of the desAB genes was abolished by deletion of zmsA, which encodes zeamine biosynthesis but could be induced by exogenous addition of zeamines. The results suggest that sophisticated and coordinated regulatory mechanisms have evolved to govern zeamine production and tolerance. Taken together, these findings documented a novel signaling role of zeamines and the first resistance mechanism against zeamines, which is a family of potent and promising antibiotics against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens.

INTRODUCTION

The phytopathogen Dickeya zeae can cause severe infections on both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants (1). Similar to other species in the Dickeya genus, the virulence of D. zeae is linked to cell motility, biofilm formation, and production of cell wall-degrading enzymes (13), except that D. zeae also produces a family of phytotoxins, known as zeamines (4, 5). Zeamines are a family of structurally related polyamino compounds that play important roles in the pathogenicity of D. zeae EC1. Inactivation of zmsA, the key gene responsible for the biosynthesis of all zeamine compounds, abrogated the infectivity of D. zeae EC1 on rice, potato, and Chinese cabbage (4).

Zeamines are produced by Dickeya species and Serratia plymuthica strains with the zms gene cluster, including D. zeae EC1 and S. plymuthica RVH1 (49). Among them, zeamine, zeamine I, and prezeamines are the derivatives of a polyamino chain zeamine II, with polyketide moiety conjugating at the terminal amino group of zeamine II (47, 9). Apart from their important role in the virulence of D. zeae EC1, zeamines are also potent antibiotics with broad-spectrum activity against various organisms, including multidrug-resistant bacteria, fungi, oomycetes, and nematodes (810). Evidence shows that zeamines target the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria in a way reminiscent of the cationic antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B (11). Organization of the zms gene clusters is genetically well conserved in D. zeae EC1 and S. plymuthica RVH1, with genes encoding polyketide synthases (PKSs), nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs), and fatty acid synthases (FASs). In addition, five genes within the zms gene cluster were predicted to encode transporter proteins, including four encoding putative ATPases and permeases associated with the ABC transporter system and one encoding a potential HlyD superfamily protein (6, 8, 12). One of the predicted ABC transport systems encoded by zmn20 and zmn21 was proposed to be a zeamine transporter and associated with zeamine resistance in S. plymuthica RVH1 (6), but this speculation has not yet been validated experimentally.

Multidrug resistance (MDR) efflux pumps are membrane-associated proteins that can export a wide range of antibiotics and confer intrinsic antibiotic-resistant ability to bacteria. The efflux pumps can be classified into five superfamilies: MFS (major facilitator superfamily), ABC (ATP-binding cassette), SMR (small multidrug resistance), MATE (multidrug and toxic compound extrusion), and RND (resistance-nodulation-cell division) (13). In Gram-negative bacteria, RND efflux pumps play important roles in MDR due to their broad-spectrum substrate profile (14). The RND efflux pump is a tripartite complex system comprised of an outer membrane channel, an adaptor, and an inner membrane protein, all of which are required for the full function of antibiotic transportation (15). The genes responsible for encoding RND efflux pumps are commonly presented as a single operon in bacteria, like the MexAB-OprM efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16), but there are also exceptional cases with the gene encoding outer membrane channel protein placed in another location in the genome (17). In RND efflux pumps, antibiotic specificity is determined by the inner membrane protein. Antibiotics belonging to different families can enter into the inner membrane proteins through three putative entrance channels opening to the central cavity of inner membrane protein, the inner membrane, and periplasmic space of bacterial cells (18). The multiple active binding sites in the porter region of inner membrane proteins make it possible for the RND efflux pumps to transport a variety of structurally unrelated antibiotics produced by bacteria themselves (19) or from the environment (20, 21).

How D. zeae EC1 protects itself from the antimicrobial activity of zeamines remains unknown. While the MICs of zeamines for most bacterial pathogens are low, in the range of 0.3 to 10 μg/ml (9), our preliminary assay results showed that the zeamine producer D. zeae EC1 could tolerate up to 1,800 μg/ml of zeamines, suggesting a high-level resistance mechanism(s) is encoded by the D. zeae EC1 genome. In this study, we tested whether the transporter genes within the zms gene cluster, which were speculated to play roles in zeamine resistance (6), and the adjacent genes encoding RND efflux pump are associated with zeamine resistance in D. zeae EC1. Our results rule out the possible involvement of the ABC transporter genes within the zms gene cluster in zeamine resistance but lead to identification of a RND efflux pump, DesABC, that confers a high level of zeamine tolerance in D. zeae EC1. Substrate specificity assay against a range of antibiotics showed that DesABC appeared to only confer resistance against zeamines. In addition, the DesABC efflux system was found to be functionally conserved in Dickeya species. Interestingly, consistent with the zeamine-specific pattern of DesABC, we found that the transcriptional expression of its coding genes, desAB, was stimulated by the presence of zeamines, suggesting that DesABC co-evolved with the genes encoding zeamine biosynthesis to ensure high-level production of the antibiotics.

RESULTS

The ABC transporter systems encoded by the zms gene cluster are not required for zeamine resistance in D. zeae EC1.

As the transporter systems present within the antibiotic biosynthesis gene clusters often confer resistance to the encoded antibiotics, we conducted bioinformatics analysis of the five transporter genes, i.e., zmsP, zmsQ, zmsR, zmsL, and zmsM (NCBI accession no. WP_016943528.1, WP_016943529.1, WP_016943530.1, WP_016943542.1, and WP_016943543.1, respectively) within the zms gene cluster of D. zeae EC1 (Fig. 1) (12). These genes share similar genetic organization (Fig. 1) and high levels of identity and similarity in amino acids (above 69% and 82%, respectively) (Table S2) to their homologs found in S. plymuthica and other Dickeya species and strains with the zms gene clusters (8). Among them, sequence analysis showed that zmsP encodes a potential HlyD family protein, zmsR and zmsM encode potential ABC transporter permeases, and zmsQ and zmsL encode potential ABC transporter ATPases. The homologs of zmsM and zmsL were hypothesized to encode a zeamine transporter, conferring self-resistance against zeamines in S. plymuthica RVH1 (6). As a previous study indicated that the HlyD family protein could form a functional transport system with ABC transporter proteins (22), ZmsP was considered a part of the ABC transporter systems encoded by the zms gene cluster. To elucidate the potential roles of these genes in zeamine resistance, in-frame deletion was performed to generate the deletion mutants of zmsR and zmsM, respectively, which represent the two putative transport systems encoded by the zms gene cluster of D. zeae EC1. Zeamines were purified from the cell culture of D. zeae EC1 and confirmed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) and used for determination of MIC against different bacterial strains in this study. The results showed that inactivation of zmsR or zmsM could not cause any change in the MIC of zeamines compared with those of the wild-type strain EC1 (data not shown). These findings preclude the possible association of these ABC transport systems with zeamine resistance, and their roles remain to be further investigated.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Organization of transporter genes within and adjacent to the zms gene cluster in Dickeya species and Serratia plymuthica strains. The organization of genes was drawn using Illustrator for Biological Sequences (34). Data were derived from NCBI and updated to 24 July 2018.

FIG S1

High-resolution mass spectrum of zeamine II (A), zeamine I (B), and zeamine (C) detected by LC-MS in purified zeamine samples. The structure was drawn by using the software ChemBioDraw Ultra 14.0 (Cambridgesoft). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.3 MB (285.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Identity and similarity of the transporter genes within and adjacent to the zms gene clusters in Dickeya species and Serratia plymuthica strains. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (31.3KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DesABC efflux system is required for zeamine resistance.

In addition to the five potential transporter genes within the zms gene cluster, further bioinformatics analysis unveiled two genes encoding RND efflux pump proteins located adjacent to the zms gene cluster of D. zeae EC1 and another three Dickeya species and strains (Fig. 1). One of the gene clusters encodes a putative AcrA-like adaptor protein, and the other encodes a potential AcrB-like inner membrane protein. The AcrAB-TolC RND efflux system has been well characterized as being associated with multiple antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli, including β-lactams, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and rifampin, with acrAB located together in the genome and tolC at a distant location (15). We proposed to name these two genes desA and desB, for Dickeya efflux system proteins A and B (Fig. 1). Interestingly, the desAB genes are not present within the vicinity of the zms gene cluster in S. plymuthica strains (Fig. 1).

Topological analysis of DesB revealed typical features of inner membrane transporter protein in an RND efflux system with 12 transmembrane helix domains (TM) and 2 large periplasmic loops spanning from TM1 to TM2 and TM7 to TM8 (Fig. S2) (23). In RND efflux systems, a tripartite complex is required for the full function of substrate transportation. To identify the outer channel protein for DesAB, a BLAST search was conducted to identify the homolog of E. coli outer membrane protein TolC. The result showed that only one tolC homolog (74% identity and 86% similarity at the amino acid level) is present in the genome of D. zeae EC1, which was designated desC accordingly. To elucidate the role of the DesABC system in zeamine resistance, three des genes were deleted in-frame separately at the background of the strain defective in zeamine production, i.e., zmsA in-frame deletion mutant. Inactivation of desA and desB led to about an 8-fold decrease in the MIC of zeamines, while deletion of desC led to about a 32-fold decrease in MIC (Table 1). Consistent with the above-described results, in trans expression of desB and desC in the corresponding mutants could increase the zeamine resistance level of the mutants (Table 1). In addition, we found that heterologous expression of desABC under the control of the lac and tetO promoter in E. coli DH5α increased the MIC of zeamines by 2-fold (Table 1). These results demonstrate the role of the RND system DesABC in self-protection of D. zeae EC1 against the antimicrobial activity of zeamines.

TABLE 1.

Zeamine susceptibility of Dickeya zeae and Escherichia coli derivatives

Strain ZEAa MIC (μg/ml)
ΔzmsA 1,800
ΔzmsAΔdesB 225
ΔzmsAΔdesA 225
ΔzmsAΔdesC 56.25
ΔzmsAΔdesB(pBB-desB) 1,800
ΔzmsAΔdesB(pBB-desB3937) 1,800
ΔzmsAΔdesC(pBB-desC) 900
DH5α 3.52
DH5α(pBB, pAmob) 3.52
DH5α(pBB-desAB, pAmob-desC) 7.03
a

ZEA, zeamines.

FIG S2

Predicted topological structure of DesB in cell membrane. TMHMM (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) was used to analyze DesB amino acids, and the result was illustrated using TMRPRES2D software. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.3 MB (289.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DesABC efflux system is zeamine specific and functionally conserved in Dickeya species.

DesABC belongs to the RND efflux systems, in which the inner membrane proteins associated with recognition and binding have been well characterized to aid in understanding their substrate profiles (14). For example, MexY from P. aeruginosa is required for streptomycin resistance (24), MexB and AcrB from P. aeruginosa and E. coli are associated with chloramphenicol and tetracycline resistance (25, 26), CmeB from Campylobacter jejuni plays a role in resistance against ampicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and tetracycline (27), and AdeB in Acinetobacter baumannii BM4454 is involved in tetracycline, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and kanamycin resistance (28). To understand the potential substrate profile of the DesABC efflux pump, a phylogenic tree was constructed with DesB of D. zeae EC1 and its homologs (sequence similarity above 93%) found by blastp search in Dickeya species, other proteobacterial species, including the homologs (sequence similarity above 80%) from S. plymuthica strains containing the zms gene cluster, as well as the above-mentioned inner membrane proteins with known functions (Table S3). The DesB phylogeny was largely consistent with known evolutionary relationships among the bacterial genomes. All of the Dickeya DesB proteins formed a monophyletic clade in the tree, whereas the homologs from other genera were more distantly related (Fig. S3). Notably, the inner membrane proteins with known substrate profiles were clustered together on the tree and showed considerable divergence from the DesB homologs from Dickeya species. The result suggests that DesB and its homologs from Dickeya species have a different substrate profile than their counterparts from other bacterial species.

FIG S3

Phylogenic relationship of DesB with the inner membrane proteins of other RND efflux pumps. The black dots show bootstrap support higher than 95%. The underlines show the positions of DesB from Dickeya zeae EC1 and DesB3937 from Dickeya dadantii 3937. The black triangles show the proteins whose substrate profiles were determined previously. Download FIG S3, DOCX file, 1.8 MB (1.9MB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Characteristics of RND family genes used in phylogenic study. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (33KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The substrate profile of DesABC was then examined experimentally by MIC assay. The results showed that in trans expression of desB from D. zeae EC1 or desB3937 from D. dadantii 3937, which lacks the zms gene cluster, in the zmsA-desB double deletion mutant of D. zeae EC1 could fully restore the zeamine resistance (Table 1), suggesting that the desB orthologs from other Dickeya species (Table S3) have a similar function in zeamine resistance. MIC assay was also performed using antibiotics which belong to different classes and have different targets (Table S4). The results showed that neither inactivation of desB nor overexpression of desAB genes in D. zeae EC1 could affect the MICs of ampicillin, tetracycline, kanamycin, gentamicin, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol (Table S5). The above data are consistent with the phylogenetic analysis results (Fig. S3), indicating that the DesABC system has a distinct substrate specificity.

TABLE S4

Classes and targets of antibiotics. Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (22.8KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S5

Antibiotic susceptibility of the desB mutant, desAB overexpression strain, and their parental strains. Download Table S5, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (23.2KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DesABC efflux system is essential for D. zeae survival against zeamines.

As the DesABC system was found to be required for zeamine resistance, a survival assay was conducted against zeamines using the zmsA mutant, the zmsA-desB double deletion mutant, and the double mutant complemented with desB. Bacterial cells were added to LS5 salts, without carbon source, supplemented with zeamines at a final concentration of 2-fold the MIC of the zmsA-desB double deletion mutant, and bacterial cell numbers were measured at different time points upon treatment with zeamines to evaluate the role of DesABC in D. zeae EC1 survival. The results showed that inactivation of desB resulted in a sharp decline in survival rate, whereas its parental and complemented strains could maintain upon to a three-log larger amount of survivors than the desB mutant at 30 min after treatment (Fig. 2). These results indicate that the DesABC efflux pump plays an indispensable role in the survival of strain EC1 when the bacterial cells were treated with zeamines.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Survival analysis of the desB mutant and its parental and complementation strains treated with zeamines. Bacterial cells were measured at 10, 20, and 30 min after treatment with zeamines. The survival rate was expressed as the percentage of the colony counts of the control not exposed to zeamines. Data in the graph are the means from three repeats, and error bars are standard deviations.

DesABC efflux system confers bacterial self-resistance against zeamines at the late stage of bacterial growth.

To investigate the protective spectrum of DesABC during cell growth, an in-frame deletion mutant of desB was constructed using D. zeae wild-type strain EC1. The cell growth curves and zeamine production of wild-type strain EC1 and desB mutant were compared in LS5 medium, which was optimized for zeamine production (29). At the early stage after inoculation (12 to 24 h), the growth rate and zeamine production were comparable between strain EC1 and the desB mutant (Fig. 3A). However, the growth of the desB mutant was arrested in the subsequent stages after 24 h (Fig. 3A), and similarly, accumulation of zeamines in bacterial supernatant was also flattened after 24 h (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that D. zeae cells could tolerate a certain level of zeamines in the absence of the DesABC efflux system, but along with bacterial growth and zeamine accumulation, the DesABC efflux pump becomes indispensable for protecting bacterial cells against the detrimental effect of zeamines.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Analysis of the bacterial growth, zeamine production, and the expression pattern of desAB. (A) Growth kinetics of wild-type strain EC1 and its desB mutant. Cell cultures at different time points were collected for measuring the OD600 for plotting the growth curves. (B) Zeamine production profiles of strain EC1 and its desB mutant. The collected bacterial culture supernatants were filter sterilized for quantification of zeamine production. (C) Transcriptional fusion assay to determine the expression pattern of desAB in D. zeae. Strain EC1 containing the expression construct pDesABgfp was cultured in flasks with LS5 medium. Cell cultures at different time points were collected for monitoring the fluorescence. The relative fluorescence was expressed as the fluorescence monitored at specific time points normalized to the fluorescence of EC1(pDesABgfp) at 12 h after inoculation. Data in the graph are the means from three repeats, and error bars are standard deviations. Significant values are indicated by bars and asterisks. **, P < 0.01.

To determine the relationship between expression of DesABC genes and zeamine resistance, the gfp coding region was placed under the promoter of desAB, and the transcriptional fusion construct pDesABgfp was prepared. The expression of desAB was evaluated by monitoring the fluorescence of wild-type strain EC1 containing the pDesABgfp construct grown in LS5 medium by using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer system. The results showed that expression of desAB was bacterial population density dependent, showing a basal-level expression at the early growth stage (12 to 20 h) and rapidly increased expression at 20 h onward after inoculation (Fig. 3C). As the DesABC system was critical to the bacterial growth at the late growth stage (Fig. 3A), the above results indicate that zeamine resistance mediated by the DesABC efflux system is positively related to the expression level of desAB genes.

Expression of desAB is induced by zeamines.

Expression of desAB genes was consistent with zeamine production during cell growth (Fig. 3), suggesting that desAB expression is influenced by zeamines. To test this possibility, the pDesABgfp construct was introduced into the D. zeae ΔzmsA mutant. Our previous results showed that deletion of zmsA abolished production of all the zeamines (4). The gfp expression level driven by the promoter of desAB in wild-type strain EC1 and the zmsA mutant was monitored at different time points during bacterial growth in LS5 medium. The results showed that the growth patterns of both strains were similar (Fig. 4A), but the expression levels of desAB in these strains were varied substantially (Fig. 4B). The expression of desAB in strain EC1 was increased along with bacterial growth but remained flat in the toxin-minus ΔzmsA mutant (Fig. 4B).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Expression of desAB is positively related to the exposure of zeamines. (A) Growth curves of EC1(pDesABgfp) and ΔzmsA(pDesABgfp) strains were measured in the flasks with LS5 medium at 12 h, 16 h, 20 h, and 24 h after inoculation. (B) The desAB expression patterns in the wild-type strain EC1 and ΔzmsA zeamine-minus mutant. The relative fluorescence was expressed as the fluorescence monitored at specific time points normalized to the fluorescence of strain EC1(pDesABgfp) at 12 h after inoculation. (C) qPCR analysis of desB gene expression in strain EC1 and the ΔzmsA mutant. (D) Relative fluorescence of ΔzmsA(pDesABgfp) and 3937(pDesAB3937gfp) strains with exogenous addition of polymyxin B (PMB) or zeamines (ZEA). The same amounts of water (WAT) and methanol (MET) were added as controls. The ΔzmsA(pDesABgfp) or 3937(pDesAB3937gfp) strain was grown in LS5 medium and adjusted to an OD600 of about 0.5 (±0.05). Bacterial cells were then treated with different concentrations of polymyxin B or zeamines for 8 h. The relative fluorescence of cells with different treatments was normalized to the fluorescence of cells in water or methanol control, which was set as 1. Data in the graph show the means from three repeats and standard deviations (A, B, and D) or standard errors (C).

For validation of the findings described above, the transcript levels of the DesABC efflux system genes in D. zeae strain EC1 and the zmsA mutant were determined at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of about 1.5 (approximately 20 h after inoculation). The quantitative PCR (qPCR) results showed that although the transcript level of desC was comparable between strain EC1 and the ΔzmsA mutant (fold change of less than 2; data not shown), the desB transcript level in strain EC1 was significantly higher than that in the ΔzmsA mutant, which was hardly detectable (Fig. 4C). The basal level of expression of desAB noticed in the zmsA mutant coupled with their induced expression in wild-type strain EC1 suggest that expression of the desAB genes rely on the product of zmsA, i.e., zeamines.

To further confirm this assumption, expression of desAB was monitored in the ΔzmsA(pDesABgfp) strain treated with zeamines. The result showed that a supplement of zeamines at a final concentration of 100 μg/ml did not decrease the cell growth of the ΔzmsA(pDesABgfp) strain but led to about a 30-fold higher expression of desAB genes compared with that of the control without addition of zeamines (Fig. 4D). Notably, a low concentration of zeamines, 5 μg/ml, could significantly induce the expression of desAB genes in D. zeae EC1 and their homologs in D. dadantii 3937. As a control, we also tested whether expression of desAB could be induced by polymyxin B by incubation of the ΔzmsA(pDesABgfp) strain with polymyxin B at the same concentration as zeamines. The results showed that unlike zeamines, polymyxin B could not trigger the expression of desAB genes (Fig. 4D). Cumulatively, these results unveil a novel and specific signaling role of zeamines in triggering the expression of the desAB genes in Dickeya species and strains.

DISCUSSION

Unlike most bacterial pathogens, which are highly sensitive to zeamines (9, 10), the zeamine producer D. zeae EC1 can withstand a high level of zeamines. In this study, we identified a novel RND efflux pump, DesABC, that plays a role in resistance against zeamines, especially at the late stage of bacterial growth, when zeamines were accumulated at a high level. Null mutation of the efflux pump could lead to up to about a 32-fold decrease in zeamine resistance. In contrast, the DesABC efflux pump was not functional against a range of conventional antibiotics, including ampicillin, tetracycline, kanamycin, gentamicin, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol. Furthermore, we also showed that desAB expression was growth and zeamine dependent and documented a novel signaling role of zeamines in regulation of desAB transcription. Moreover, we found that deletion of the desB gene could substantially reduce the accumulation of zeamines, suggesting that zeamine biosynthesis and resistance are modulated by coordinated and sophisticated regulatory mechanisms.

The zeamine biosynthesis genes and desAB were clustered in the genomes of D. zeae EC1 and another three Dickeya species and strains according to bioinformatics analysis (Fig. 1). However, despite their functional relevance (Fig. 4), the results from this study suggest that desAB and zeamine biosynthesis genes are not tightly linked during evolution. This is evident as the genomes of multiple Dickeya species and strains, such as D. zeae Ech586 and D. dadantii 3937, contain desAB but not the zeamine biosynthesis genes. It is possible that the common ancestor of Dickeya contains both desAB and zeamine biosynthesis genes, but some Dickeya species and strains subsequently lost the ability to produce zeamines while maintaining DesABC as a defense mechanism. How the genes responsible for zeamine biosynthesis and resistance have originated during evolution remains to be further investigated. Interestingly, the desAB genes were not found in the vicinity of the zms gene cluster in S. plymuthica strains (Fig. 1), which is also known for production of zeamines (6, 7), suggesting that D. zeae and S. plymuthica have different evolutionary origins of the genes encoding zeamine biosynthesis and resistance.

The RND family proteins associated with antibiotic resistance can commonly transport a broad spectrum of substrates, which is determined by the corresponding inner membrane proteins of the efflux pumps (14). Most inner membrane proteins in the RND family found in human bacterial pathogens, including E. coli (15), P. aeruginosa (16), Burkholderia (30), and Acinetobacter (31), are related to transportation of multiple structurally dissimilar antibiotics. In contrast, we found that the DesABC efflux system of D. zeae EC1 was zeamine specific (Table 1; see also Table S5 in the supplemental material). Interestingly, two RND efflux pump systems found in Erwinia amylovora, a plant bacterial pathogen causing fire blight disease, also displayed narrow substrate specificity. Overexpression of these two RND efflux systems, MdtABC and MdtUVW, only resulted in the increment of MIC of several phytochemicals but had no effect on various conventional antibiotics (21), including some antibiotics used in our study (Table S5). Given that both D. zeae and E. amylovora are plant pathogens with little exposure to conventional antibiotics, these findings agree with the previous findings about the linkage between intrinsic resistance and the habitat of environmental bacteria (32). The narrow substrate specificity of MdtABC and MdtUVW in E. amylovora and DesABC in D. zeae EC1 may reflect the ancient role of the corresponding RND efflux pumps for bacteria to survive in hazardous environments generated by bacteria themselves or by other organisms.

Intriguingly, our results showed that inactivation of the desABC genes could cause different levels of decrement in the MIC of zeamines. Mutation of desA or desB led to only about an 8-fold decrease in MIC compared with that of the control strain (Table 1), while inactivation of desC could result in about a 32-fold decrease. A plausible explanation is that similar to its homolog tolC in E. coli (15), other proteins in strain EC1 are able to replace DesAB and form a functional transportation system with DesC to efflux zeamines. In addition, heterologous expression of desABC in E. coli resulted in only about a 2-fold increment in the MIC of zeamines, which was not comparable to the MIC changes when desABC were deleted in strain EC1. We first checked the possibility of whether the differences in GC content and codon usage of these two bacterial species affect the expression efficiency of desABC genes in E. coli. Our previous study showed that the GC content of the D. zeae EC1 genome is 53.43% (12), which is not identical but not substantially different from the GC content (50.8%) of E. coli strain K-12 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse#!/prokaryotes/Escherichia%20coli%20K-12). Strain K-12 is the parental strain of E. coli strain DH5α used in this study. At the codon usage level, both bacteria have more or less similar codon usage patterns, except that the rarely used codon CUA in E. coli is a frequently used codon in the coding sequence of desB in D. zeae EC1 (Table S6). We then examined the potential toxic effect of overexpressed DesABC in E. coli, as other overexpressed membrane proteins commonly exhibit detrimental effects on bacterial growth (33). We found that E. coli growth was markedly retarded when DesABC were overexpressed (Fig. S4). Taken together, it is most likely that overexpressed DesABC membrane proteins affect the bacterial normal physiological functions and, hence, compromise the ability to withstand zeamines.

FIG S4

Heterologous expression of DesABC affects the growth of Escherichia coli. E. coli strain without plasmids (E. coli DH5α), E. coli strain with control plasmids [E. coli DH5α(pAmob, pBB)], and E. coli strain with desABC [E. coli DH5α(pAmob-desC pBB-desAB)] were grown to exponential phase in LB medium. Cell cultures were adjusted to an OD600 of about 0.5 and inoculated to LB medium at a ratio of 0.1%. Growth curves were determined at 37°C using Bioscreen-C (OY Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Helsinki, Finland) in a low-intensity model by monitoring the optical density of 600 nm. The experiments were individually performed twice. Data shown are the means from three replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviations. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.3 MB (341.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S6

Codon usage of the coding sequences of desB in Dickeya zeae EC1 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL933. Download Table S6, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (32.6KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Our data indicate that zeamine biosynthesis and DesABC-mediated resistance mechanisms are well coordinated by a sophisticated mechanism(s). The level of desAB gene expression was increased along with accumulation of zeamines (Fig. 3B and C and 4B), and deletion of zmsA, the gene essential for zeamine biosynthesis (4), caused an arrest of the transcriptional expression of desAB (Fig. 4B and C). Significantly, exogenous addition of zeamines to the zmsA mutant could boost desAB expression by more than 30-fold compared with that for water or solvent control (Fig. 4D). The findings thus demonstrated that in addition to their roles as phytotoxins and antibiotics (4, 5, 810), zeamines can also act as signals in modulation of gene expression (Fig. 4D). The signal role of zeamines in induction of desAB expression was further confirmed in D. dadantii strain 3937 (Fig. 4D), which does not contain a zms gene cluster. Considering the wild distribution of zms gene clusters and desAB homologs in Dickeya species and strains (Fig. 1 and Table S3) (8), we hypothesize that Dickeya species and strains have evolved a dedicated pathway to sense extracellular zeamines in self-protection against the detrimental effect of these antibiotics. The key regulators in this pathway might at least include a sensor or receptor protein that detects and responds to zeamines and a transcriptional regulator that modulates the expression of desAB. A gene that encodes a proposed two-component system sensor (NCBI accession number WP_029456608.1) was found near the desAB locus. However, inactivation of this gene did not affect the MIC of zeamines, which seems to preclude its potential link with the regulation of desAB (data not shown). In addition, given that the cellular levels of zeamines are important in induction of the zeamine resistance genes (Fig. 4D), several regulators known to be associated with the regulation of zeamine production and virulence, such as the acylhomoserine lactone (AHL) synthase ExpI (1), transcriptional regulator SlyA (3), and global regulator Fis (46), might also influence the transcriptional expression of desAB through modulating the production of zeamines or even more direct regulatory mechanisms, which demands further investigation.

In summary, this study documented a first resistance mechanism against zeamines, which are a new family of potent antibiotics with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activities. This resistance mechanism is mediated by a novel and substrate-specific RND efflux pump, DesABC. Interestingly, this study also unveiled a signaling role of zeamines in modulation of desAB expression at the transcriptional level, which further expands our understanding about zeamines. In addition, the findings from this study suggest that D. zeae EC1 contains other mechanisms implicated in zeamine resistance besides the DesABC efflux system. This is evident as the MIC of zeamines for D. zeae EC1 was more than 500-fold higher than that for the zeamine-sensitive E. coli DH5α, whereas inactivation of desC in D. zeae EC1 led to only about a 32-fold decrease in the MIC of zeamines (Table 1). A thorough understanding of the zeamine resistance mechanisms and the cognate regulatory networks might pave the way for practical application of these potent antibiotics and also could provide new insight on the control and prevention of this important bacterial pathogen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 2. D. zeae EC1 and derivatives were routinely grown at 28°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium, minimal medium (MM) [10.5 g K2HPO4, 4.5 g KH2PO4, 2.0 g (NH4)2SO4, 2.0 g mannitol, 2.0 g glycerol, 0.2 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g CaCl2, 0.005 g FeSO4·7H2O, and 0.002 g MnCl2·4H2O per liter, pH 7.0], or LS5 medium (5.25 g K2HPO4, 2.25 g KH2PO4, 10.0 g sucrose, 3.6 g NH4NO3, 1.0 g KCl, and 0.25 g MgSO4·7H2O per liter, pH 7.0) as indicated (29). E. coli strains were routinely grown at 37°C. The following antibiotics were supplemented when necessary: streptomycin, 50 μg/ml; kanamycin, 50 μg/ml; ampicillin, 50 μg/ml; chloramphenicol, 15 μg/ml.

TABLE 2.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid Relevant characteristic(s)a Source or reference
Strains
    Dickeya zeae
    EC1 Wild-type strain of D. zeae 1
        EC1(pDesABgfp) EC1 carry pDesABgfp vector, Kanr This study
        ΔzmsA In-frame deletion of zmsA in EC1 Laboratory collection
        ΔzmsA(pDesABgfp) ΔzmsA carrying pDesABgfp vector, Kanr This study
        ΔzmsAΔdesA ΔzmsA carry the in-frame deletion of desA This study
        ΔzmsAΔdesB ΔzmsA carrying the in-frame deletion of desB This study
        ΔzmsAΔdesB(pBB) ΔzmsAΔdesB carrying pBBR1-MCS4 vector, Ampr This study
        ΔzmsAΔdesB(pBB-desB) ΔzmsAΔdesB carrying pBB-desB vector, Ampr This study
        ΔzmsAΔdesB(pBB-desB3937) ΔzmsAΔdesB carrying pBB-desB3937 vector, Ampr This study
        ΔzmsAΔdesC ΔzmsA carrying the in-frame deletion of desC This study
        ΔzmsAΔdesC(pBB-desC) ΔzmsAΔdesC carrying pBB-desC vector, Ampr This study
        ΔdesB In-frame deletion of desB in EC1 This study
        ΔzmsR In-frame deletion of zmsR in EC1 Laboratory collection
        ΔzmsM In-frame deletion of zmsM in EC1 Laboratory collection
    Escherichia coli
        DH5α F φ80lacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169 endA1 recA1 hsdR17(rK mK+)
supE44 λ thi-1 gyrA96 relA1 phoA
TransGen Biotech, China
        DH5α(pBB, pAmob) DH5α harboring both pBBR1-MCS4 (Ampr) and pAmob (Tetr, Chlr) This study
        DH5α(pBB-desAB, pAmob-desC) DH5α harboring both pBB-desAB (Ampr) and pAmob-desC (Chlr) This study
        CC118 Host strain for replication of pKNG101 and derivate plasmids Laboratory collection
        HB101(pRK2013) thr leu thi recA hsdR hsdM pro, Kanr Laboratory collection
    Dickeya dadantii
        3937(pDesAB3937gfp) 3937 carrying pDesAB3937gfp, Kanr This study
Plasmids
    pKNG101 Suicide vector for gene in-frame deletion, Strr Laboratory collection
    pKNG-desA pKNG101 harboring flanking region of desA This study
    pKNG-desB pKNG101 harboring flanking region of desB This study
    pKNG-desC pKNG101 harboring flanking region of desC This study
    pBB Low-copy-number vector pBBR1-MCS4 with lac promoter, Ampr Lab collection
    pBB-desB pBBR1-MCS4 harboring ORF of desB gene from EC1, Ampr This study
    pBB-desB3937 pBBR1-MCS4 harboring ORF of desB gene homolog from Dickeya dadantii 3937, Ampr This study
    pBB-desAB pBBR1-MCS4 harboring ORF of desAB genes from EC1, Ampr This study
    pBB-desC pBBR1-MCS4 harboring ORF of desC gene from EC1, Ampr This study
    pAmob pACYC184 with mob region cloned from pBBR1-MCS4 inserting in
BstZ17I restriction site, Tetr, Chlr
This study
    pAmob-desC pAmob harboring desC gene from EC1 under the control of
tetracycline resistance gene promoter tetO, Chlr
This study
    pPROBE-NT Promoterless gfp transcriptional reporter plasmid, Kanr 43
    pDesABgfp gfp transcriptional fusion with upstream region of desAB in EC1 This study
    pDesAB3937gfp gfp transcriptional fusion with upstream region of desAB3937 found in 3937 This study
a

Abbreviations: Ampr, ampicillin resistance; Tetr, tetracycline resistance; Chlr, chloramphenicol resistance; Kanr, kanamycin resistance; Strr, streptomycin resistance.

Construction of deletion and complementation strains.

Oligonucleotide primers used in this study are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. DNA manipulation was conducted by following methods described previously (5). Briefly, for gene in-frame deletion, fusion fragments containing the downstream and upstream regions of target genes were cloned into pKNG101 and transformed into E. coli CC118 for construction of gene in-frame deletion constructs. Triparental mating was performed by using wild-type strain EC1 or a zmsA in-frame deletion mutant as a recipient strain. Mutants were screened on an MM agar plate supplemented with 5% (wt/vol) sucrose, and desired deletions were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. For complementation, the open reading frames (ORFs) of target genes were cloned into pBBR1-MCS4 and genes were expressed under the control of the lac promoter. The desired expression constructs were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing and introduced into corresponding mutants by triparental mating. The complementation strains were screened on MM agar plates containing ampicillin and verified by PCR. For construction of the strain expressing desABC heterologously, desC was cloned and expressed under the control of the tetO promoter in pAmob, while desAB were cloned into pBBR1-MCS4 and expressed under the control of the lac promoter. The resultant constructs, pBB-desAB and pAmob-desC, were cotransformed into E. coli DH5α for heterologous expression of the desABC efflux pump genes.

TABLE S1

Primers used in this study. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (28.1KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Preparation of zeamines.

Overnight starter culture of wild-type strain EC1 grown in LB medium was inoculated (0.1%, vol/vol) into LS5 medium and grown at 28°C with rotation at 100 rpm for 48 h. The cells were then removed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. Approximately 10-liter supernatants were then passed slowly through the column containing 500 g of absorbent resin XAD7 (Sigma) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min by following the method described previously (4). The column was consecutively eluted with 2 liters of double-distilled H2O and 1 liter of methanol prior to elution with 2 liters of acetone to obtain the elutes containing zeamines. The acetone in the elutes was evaporated, and the residues were dissolved in methanol to obtain crude zeamine antibiotics. For confirmation, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed using an Agilent 1260 infinity system connected to a Phenomenex Luna column (C18, 250 by 4.6 mm, 5 μm) coupled with a Bruker maxis Q-TOF mass spectrometer to identify three main zeamine antibiotics, zeamine, zeamine I, and zeamine II (Fig. S1). The crude zeamines were eluted with a gradient program of 5% to 95% (CH3CN supplemented with 1% formic acid in H2O) in 20 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The mass spectrometer was employed in the positive ion mode, scanning from 100 to 2,000 m/z. The source conditions were set as the following: ESI source type, end plate offset at −500 V, capillary at 4,500 V, nebulizer gas (N2) at 0.8 bar, dry gas at 5.0 liters/min, and dry temperature at 180°C. The ion transfer condition was set as the following: collision cell RF of 800.0 Vpp. The antibiotic activity of zeamines was determined according to the method described below.

Determination of MICs.

Determination of MICs of antibiotics in D. zeae and E. coli strains was conducted by following the protocol from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (35). Briefly, 2-fold dilutions of antibiotics in LB were added to 96-well plates, and fresh bacterial culture in LB medium was added to obtain about 2.0 × 105 CFU/ml in each well. The plates were incubated at 28°C or 37°C for 18 h, and the minimum antibiotic concentration with no visible cell growth was defined as the MIC.

Construction of phylogenic tree.

A total of 59 amino acid sequences obtained from NCBI (Table S3) were used in construction of the phylogenic tree, including 51 sequences found by blastp search, with the highest total score from Dickeya species and other proteobacterial species, 3 sequences from S. plymuthica strains containing homologs of the zms gene cluster, and 5 sequences with known substrate profiles. The protein sequences were aligned using MAFFT v7.402 (36) in the “einsi” mode, and the multiple-sequence alignment (MSA) was filtered for columns with high proportions of missing data using trimAl v1.4 (37) with the “-gappyout” option. The filtered MSA was analyzed by IQ-TREE v1.6.5 (38) to first perform a model selection with the “-MF” option (39), and then we carried out a maximum-likelihood tree inference under the best-fit model (“LG+R5”) with 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap support (40).

Survival assay.

The survival assay was conducted by following the kill curve method described previously, with minor modifications (41). Briefly, fresh bacterial cultures in LB medium at exponential phase were collected and adjusted to an OD600 of about 1.0 (±0.05). Cells from 1 ml culture were harvested (4,000 rpm, 4°C, 5 min) and washed twice with LS5 salts (LS5 medium without sucrose). Bacterial cells were then resuspended in LS5 salts and added to 96-well plates with LS5 salts containing zeamines. The final concentration of zeamines in the assay was at 2-fold the MIC of the zmsA-desB mutant. The plates were incubated at 28°C with agitation at 200 rpm, and the survivors were determined at specific time points by plating appropriate bacterial dilutions on LB plates.

Growth kinetics assay measured in the flasks with LS5 medium.

Bacterial growth curves in LS5 medium were measured by following the procedures described for zeamine preparation, with minor modifications. Briefly, overnight cell cultures were adjusted to an OD600 of about 0.5 (±0.05) before inoculation at a ratio of 0.1%, vol/vol, and flasks were kept at 28°C with shaking at 150 rpm. The optical density at 600 nm was measured at different time points, as indicated, by the NanoDrop 2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) with proper dilutions when necessary.

Zeamine production assay.

The assay of zeamine production was conducted by following a method described previously, with minor modifications (4). Briefly, 25 ml LB agar was poured in 10- by 10-cm square plates and overlaid with 7.5 ml 1% (wt/vol) agarose containing about 1.5 × 108 fresh E. coli DH5α cells. The wells, at 4-mm diameter, were punched in the plate, and 30 μl of cell-free supernatants (filter sterilized with a 0.22-μm pore filter) were added in each well. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and the inhibition zone around the wells was measured. For semiquantification, one unit of zeamines was defined as the amount that could generate a 2-mm-diameter inhibitory zone around the well. The number of zeamine units per milliliter was calculated by multiplying the units of zeamines calculated from the bioassay by the fold change of sample volume used in the test (30 μl) to the total volume (1 ml).

Construction of transcriptional fusion construct pDesABgfp and pDesAB3937gfp and flow cytometry analysis.

As there is only a 20-bp interval region located between the ORFs of desA and desB, the desAB genes were considered to be located in the same operon. The promoter region of desAB genes was predicted by using the online tool provided by BPROM (42) (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=bprom&group=programs&subgroup=gfindb). The 204-bp DNA fragment upstream of the ORF of desAB was amplified using the primer pair P-desAB-F and P-desAB-R (Table S1) and ligated into the promoterless gfp-reporter plasmid pPROBE-NT (43) for generation of the construct pDesABgfp. pDesABgfp and pPROBE-NT were separately mobilized into wild-type EC1 and the zmsA mutant by triparental mating with the helper strain HB101(pRK2013) to construct EC1(pDesABgfp) and ΔzmsA(pDesABgfp). 3937(pDesAB3937gfp) was constructed by a similar method. Expression of desAB and desAB3937 was analyzed by monitoring the average fluorescence of 50,000 cells when bacteria were grown in flasks with LS5 medium at different time points by a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) by following the method previously described (44).

RNA extraction and real-time qPCR analysis.

Bacterial cells were cultured and harvested at an OD600 of about 1.5 (±0.05). RNA extraction was performed using the RiboPure RNA purification kit, bacteria (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), by following the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity of RNA was determined by gel electrophoresis, and the A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios were determined using a NanoDrop 2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). In qPCR analysis, an aliquot of 300 ng RNA sample was used for genomic DNA elimination and cDNA synthesis by a FastKing RT kit (with gDNase) (Tiangen Biotech, Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) by following the manufacturer’s protocol. Specific primers for the desC, desB, and 16S rRNA genes (Table S1) were designed by AlleleID 6.0 (PRIMER Biosoft). The housekeeping gene 16S rRNA was used as a reference. The PCR efficiency of each gene was determined using five DNA standards at different concentrations (10, 1, 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 μg/ml). The qPCR analysis was conducted on a Quantstudio 6 Flex system using PowerUp SYBR green master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the following cycle profile: 1 cycle at 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 57°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 30 s. The experiment was repeated three times, each time with triplicates. Data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method as previously described (45).

Statistical analysis.

Experiments were individually performed at least twice with three replicates each time. Data shown are the means from three replicates, and error bars indicated the standard deviations or standard errors. Statistical comparison was performed by using Student's t test in GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Data availability.

The genome sequence of D. zeae EC1 is accessible in NCBI under accession number NZ_CP006929.1. The amino acid sequence of TolC in E. coli K-12 AG100 is accessible in NCBI under accession number WP_000735278.1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Feng Luwen for providing the plasmid pPROBE-NT and to the Guangdong Innovative and the Entrepreneurial Research Team of Sociomicrobiology Basic and Frontier Technology for providing the CytoFLEX flow cytometer. Funding for this work was provided by the National Key Project for Basic Research of China (no. 2015CB150600) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31270170, 31330002, and 31470236).

Z.L., L.H., F.H., X.Z., Z.S., J.Z., Y.C., M.L., and Y.C. performed experiments. Z.L. and L.-H.Z. designed experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper.

We declare that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this paper.

Footnotes

Citation Liang Z, Huang L, He F, Zhou X, Shi Z, Zhou J, Chen Y, Lv M, Chen Y, Zhang L-H. 2019. A substrate-activated efflux pump, DesABC, confers zeamine resistance to Dickeya zeae. mBio 10:e00713-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00713-19.

Contributor Information

Susan Gottesman, National Cancer Institute.

Martin Welch, University of Cambridge.

Vittorio Venturi, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hussain M, Zhang HB, Xu JL, Liu Q, Jiang Z, Zhang LH. 2008. The acyl-homoserine lactone-type quorum-sensing system modulates cell motility and virulence of Erwinia chrysanthemi pv. zeae. J Bacteriol 190:1045–1053. doi: 10.1128/JB.01472-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reverchon S, Nasser W. 2013. Dickeya ecology, environment sensing and regulation of virulence programme. Environ Microbiol Rep 5:622–636. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou JN, Zhang HB, Lv MF, Chen YF, Liao LS, Cheng YY, Liu SY, Chen SH, He F, Cui ZN, Jiang ZD, Chang CQ, Zhang LH. 2016. SlyA regulates phytotoxin production and virulence in Dickeya zeae EC1. Mol Plant Pathol 17:1398–1408. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou J, Zhang H, Wu J, Liu Q, Xi P, Lee J, Liao J, Jiang Z, Zhang LH. 2011. A novel multidomain polyketide synthase is essential for zeamine production and the virulence of Dickeya zeae. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:1156–1164. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-04-11-0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheng Y, Liu X, An S, Chang C, Zou Y, Huang L, Zhong J, Liu Q, Jiang Z, Zhou J, Zhang LH. 2013. A nonribosomal peptide synthase containing a stand-alone condensation domain is essential for phytotoxin zeamine biosynthesis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 26:1294–1301. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-04-13-0098-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Masschelein J, Mattheus W, Gao LJ, Moons P, Van Houdt R, Uytterhoeven B, Lamberigts C, Lescrinier E, Rozenski J, Herdewijn P, Aertsen A, Michiels C, Lavigne R. 2013. A PKS/NRPS/FAS hybrid gene cluster from Serratia plymuthica RVH1 encoding the biosynthesis of three broad spectrum, zeamine-related antibiotics. PLoS One 8:e54143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Masschelein J, Clauwers C, Awodi UR, Stalmans K, Vermaelen W, Lescrinier E, Aertsen A, Michiels C, Challis GL, Lavigne R. 2015. A combination of polyunsaturated fatty acid, nonribosomal peptide and polyketide biosynthetic machinery is used to assemble the zeamine antibiotics. Chem Sci 6:923–929. doi: 10.1039/c4sc01927j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hellberg J, Matilla MA, Salmond GPC. 2015. The broad-spectrum antibiotic, zeamine, kills the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans. Front Microbiol 6:137. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu J, Zhang HB, Xu JL, Cox RJ, Simpson TJ, Zhang LH. 2010. 13C labeling reveals multiple amination reactions in the biosynthesis of a novel polyketide polyamine antibiotic zeamine from Dickeya zeae. Chem Commun (Cambridge) 46:333–335. doi: 10.1039/b916307g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liao L, Zhou J, Wang H, He F, Liu S, Jiang Z, Chen S, Zhang LH. 2015. Control of litchi downy blight by zeamines produced by Dickeya zeae. Sci Rep 5:15719. doi: 10.1038/srep15719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Masschelein J, Clauwers C, Stalmans K, Nuyts K, De Borggraeve W, Briers Y, Aertsen A, Michiels CW, Lavigne R. 2015. The zeamine antibiotics affect the integrity of bacterial membranes. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1139–1146. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03146-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou J, Cheng Y, Lv M, Liao L, Chen Y, Gu Y, Liu S, Jiang Z, Xiong Y, Zhang L. 2015. The complete genome sequence of Dickeya zeae EC1 reveals substantial divergence from other Dickeya strains and species. BMC Genomics 16:571. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1545-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li XZ, Plésiat P, Nikaido H. 2015. The challenge of efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:337–418. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00117-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamaguchi A, Nakashima R, Sakurai K. 2015. Structural basis of RND-type multidrug exporters. Front Microbiol 6:327. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Anes J, McCusker MP, Fanning S, Martins M. 2015. The ins and outs of RND efflux pumps in Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 6:587. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dreier J, Ruggerone P. 2015. Interaction of antibacterial compounds with RND efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 6:660. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alvarez-Ortega C, Olivares J, Martínez JL. 2013. RND multidrug efflux pumps: what are they good for? Front Microbiol 4:7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nakashima R, Sakurai K, Yamasaki S, Nishino K, Yamaguchi A. 2011. Structures of the multidrug exporter AcrB reveal a proximal multisite drug-binding pocket. Nature 480:565–569. doi: 10.1038/nature10641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kang H, Gross DC. 2005. Characterization of a resistance-nodulation-cell division transporter system associated with the syr-syp genomic island of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5056–5065. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5056-5065.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND. 2009. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 22:582–610. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00040-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pletzer D, Weingart H. 2014. Characterization and regulation of the resistance-nodulation-cell division-type multidrug efflux pumps MdtABC and MdtUVW from the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora. BMC Microbiol 14:185. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thanabalu T, Koronakis E, Hughes C, Koronakis V. 1998. Substrate-induced assembly of a contiguous channel for protein export from E. coli: reversible bridging of an inner-membrane translocase to an outer membrane exit pore. EMBO J 17:6487–6496. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eicher T, Cha HJ, Seeger MA, Brandstätter L, El-Delik J, Bohnert JA, Kern WV, Verrey F, Grütter MG, Diederichs K, Pos KM. 2012. Transport of drugs by the multidrug transporter AcrB involves an access and a deep binding pocket that are separated by a switch-loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5687–5692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114944109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lau CH, Hughes D, Poole K. 2014. MexY-promoted aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: involvement of a putative proximal binding pocket in aminoglycoside recognition. mBio 5:e1068. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01068-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Poole K, Krebes K, McNally C, Neshat S. 1993. Multiple antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for involvement of an efflux operon. J Bacteriol 175:7363–7372. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.22.7363-7372.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Elkins C, Nikaido H. 2002. Substrate specificity of the RND-type multidrug efflux pumps AcrB and AcrD of Escherichia coli is determined predominantly by two large periplasmic loops. J Bacteriol 184:6490–6498. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.23.6490-6499.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lin J, Michel LO, Zhang Q. 2002. CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2124–2131. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2124-2131.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Magnet S, Courvalin P, Lambert T. 2001. Resistance-nodulation-cell division-type efflux pump involved in aminoglycoside resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii strain BM4454. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:3375–3380. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3375-3380.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liao L, Cheng Y, Liu S, Zhou J, An S, Lv M, Chen Y, Gu Y, Chen S, Zhang LH. 2014. Production of novel antibiotics zeamines through optimizing Dickeya zeae fermentation conditions. PLoS One 9:e116047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Podnecky NL, Rhodes KA, Schweizer HP. 2015. Efflux pump-mediated drug resistance in Burkholderia. Front Microbiol 6:305. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Coyne S, Courvalin P, Périchon B. 2011. Efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:947–953. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01388-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Martinez JL. 2009. The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria. Proc Biol Sci 276:2521–2530. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miroux B, Walker JE. 1996. Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels. J Mol Biol 260:289–298. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu W, Xie Y, Ma J, Luo X, Nie P, Zuo Z, Lahrmann U, Zhao Q, Zheng Y, Zhao Y, Xue Y, Ren J. 2015. IBS: an illustrator for the presentation and visualization of biological sequences. Bioinformatics 31:3359–3361. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. CLSI document M07-A9 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. TrimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fernández L, Jenssen H, Bains M, Wiegand I, Gooderham WJ, Hancock R. 2012. The two-component system CprRS senses cationic peptides and triggers adaptive resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa independently of ParRS. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:6212–6222. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01530-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Solovyev V, Salamov A. 2011. Automatic annotation of microbial genomes and metagenomic sequences, p 61–78. In Li RW. (ed), Metagenomics and its applications in agriculture, biomedicine and environmental studies. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppage, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Miller WG, Leveau JH, Lindow SE. 2000. Improved gfp and inaZ broad-host-range promoter-probe vectors. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 13:1243–1250. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.11.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fan S, Tian F, Li J, Hutchins W, Chen H, Yang F, Yuan X, Cui Z, Yang C, He C. 2017. Identification of phenolic compounds that suppress the virulence of Xanthomonas oryzae on rice via the type III secretion system. Mol Plant Pathol 18:555–568. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lv M, Chen Y, Liao L, Liang Z, Shi Z, Tang Y, Ye S, Zhou J, Zhang LH. 2018. Fis is a global regulator critical for modulation of virulence factor production and pathogenicity of Dickeya zeae. Sci Rep 8:341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18578-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

High-resolution mass spectrum of zeamine II (A), zeamine I (B), and zeamine (C) detected by LC-MS in purified zeamine samples. The structure was drawn by using the software ChemBioDraw Ultra 14.0 (Cambridgesoft). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.3 MB (285.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Identity and similarity of the transporter genes within and adjacent to the zms gene clusters in Dickeya species and Serratia plymuthica strains. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (31.3KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Predicted topological structure of DesB in cell membrane. TMHMM (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) was used to analyze DesB amino acids, and the result was illustrated using TMRPRES2D software. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.3 MB (289.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Phylogenic relationship of DesB with the inner membrane proteins of other RND efflux pumps. The black dots show bootstrap support higher than 95%. The underlines show the positions of DesB from Dickeya zeae EC1 and DesB3937 from Dickeya dadantii 3937. The black triangles show the proteins whose substrate profiles were determined previously. Download FIG S3, DOCX file, 1.8 MB (1.9MB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Characteristics of RND family genes used in phylogenic study. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (33KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4

Classes and targets of antibiotics. Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (22.8KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S5

Antibiotic susceptibility of the desB mutant, desAB overexpression strain, and their parental strains. Download Table S5, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (23.2KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Heterologous expression of DesABC affects the growth of Escherichia coli. E. coli strain without plasmids (E. coli DH5α), E. coli strain with control plasmids [E. coli DH5α(pAmob, pBB)], and E. coli strain with desABC [E. coli DH5α(pAmob-desC pBB-desAB)] were grown to exponential phase in LB medium. Cell cultures were adjusted to an OD600 of about 0.5 and inoculated to LB medium at a ratio of 0.1%. Growth curves were determined at 37°C using Bioscreen-C (OY Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Helsinki, Finland) in a low-intensity model by monitoring the optical density of 600 nm. The experiments were individually performed twice. Data shown are the means from three replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviations. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.3 MB (341.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S6

Codon usage of the coding sequences of desB in Dickeya zeae EC1 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL933. Download Table S6, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (32.6KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

Primers used in this study. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (28.1KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2019 Liang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence of D. zeae EC1 is accessible in NCBI under accession number NZ_CP006929.1. The amino acid sequence of TolC in E. coli K-12 AG100 is accessible in NCBI under accession number WP_000735278.1.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES