Abstract
The most common cause of death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is AML relapse. Therefore, additive therapies post allo-HSCT have significant potential to prevent relapse. Natural killer (NK)-cell-based immunotherapies can be incorporated into the therapeutic armamentarium for the eradication of AML cells post allo-HSCT. In recent studies, NK cell-based immunotherapies, the use of adoptive NK cells, NK cells in combination with cytokines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific and trispecific killer cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor-engineered NK cells have all shown antitumor activity in AML patients. In this review, we will discuss the current strategies with these NK cell-based immunotherapies as possible therapies to cure AML patients post allo-HSCT. Additionally, we will discuss various means of immune escape in order to further understand the mechanism of NK cell-based immunotherapies against AML.
Keywords: natural killer cell, immunotherapy, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, acute myeloid leukemia, immune checkpoint, bispecific and trispecific killer cell engagers, chimeric antigen receptors
1. Introduction
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been recognized as the only curative therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Allo-HSCT’s mode of action is primarily attributed to the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect mediated by donor T-cells and natural killer (NK) cells. However, approximately 40% of the AML patients who undergo allo-HSCT will relapse, and the two-year post relapse survival among these patients is less than 20% [1,2,3,4,5,6]. With the use of targeted sequencing or flow cytometry, the persistent detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is associated with post-transplantation relapse [7,8,9]. It is therefore important to provide additional therapies to eliminate MRD after allo-HSCT, particularly in high-risk AML. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or repeat allo-HSCT as a donor cell-based therapy has been associated with improved survival in patients who relapse after allo-HSCT [1,2,3,5,10]. Although the efficacy of therapeutic DLI in relapsed AML may be suboptimal, pre-emptive, or prophylactic, DLI may have an important role [5,11,12,13]. Use of the hypomethylating agent azacitidine appears to be effective in AML following allo-HSCT [14,15]. Additionally, pre-emptive treatment with azacitidine may prevent a relapse while monitoring for MRD (NCT01462578) [16].
Previously, it had been presumed that most additional therapies would not be able to suppress the proliferation of leukemia cells in the long term in relapsed AML after allo-HSCT. However, the early use of these therapies might prevent relapse in AML, and could be an important step toward improving prognosis. Recently, immunotherapies, including NK cells administration and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have been reported as new treatment modalities after allo-HSCT in hematologic malignancies [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Previous studies had demonstrated that ICIs had antitumor immune responses for several solid tumors and hematologic malignancies [24,25,26]. However, their responses remained limited because of the lack of MHC classes I and II, which leads to less T-cell activation and proliferation, and is observed in ICI-resistant tumors [27,28,29]. In contrast, while NK cells express limited MHC (e.g., human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-Bw4, C1, and C2)-dependent receptors, they express non-MHC-dependent receptors including NKG2D, natural cytotoxicity receptors, CD96, T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig, and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domains (TIGIT), DNAM-1, SLAMF6 (also known as NTB-A), NKRP1-B, and 2B4 [21,30,31]. Additionally, consistent with donor T-cell mediated GVL, donor T-cells’ contribution to graft versus host disease (GVHD) is dependent upon recognition of HLA disparities following allo-HSCT. While administration of some ICIs post allo-HSCT may lead to severe GVHD [17,24], donor NK cells confer alloreactivity against tumors without GVHD [32,33]. Recently, we have noted that high NK cell levels in the bone marrow microenvironment immediately following allo-HSCT were associated with better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [34]. Moreover, AML patients with lower TIGIT expression following allo-HSCT had superior OS and progression-free survival [35]. Therefore, strategies to activate NK cells in order to reinforce GVL effect as a pre-emptive or prophylactic immunotherapy may improve MRD clearance in high-risk AML after allo-HSCT (Figure 1). In this review, we focus on NK cell-based immunotherapies following allo-HSCT and explore emerging therapies to eradicate MRD.
2. Adoptive NK Cell Therapy and Cytokine-Based NK Cell Therapy
Previous studies have reported an association between clinical outcomes and NK cell recovery after allo-HSCT. This likely occurs because NK cells play an essential role in GVL effects and also in preventing infection following allo-HSCT [34,36,37]. To date, adoptive transfer of NK cells from allogeneic donors to patients with AML has been performed following allo-HSCT [38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Additionally, NK cell infusion has been combined with the administration of IL-2 to boost in vivo expansion (Figure 2) [45,46,47,48]. T-regulatory cells (Tregs) are significantly increased in number following NK cell infusion and IL-2 administration, which may inhibit NK cell functionality and hinder the efficacy of adoptively transferred NK cells (Figure 3). In cases with prior IL-2-diphtheria toxin fusion protein treatment for the depletion of host Tregs, increased in vivo expansion of NK cells was noted, and relapsed/refractory AML patients were able to achieve complete remission (CR) (NCT00274846 and NCT01106950) [47]. Besides IL-2 administration, NK cells activated by IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, and IL-21 have enhanced antitumor functionality [49,50,51,52]. These cytokines also lead to an increase in varying degrees of host and/or donor CD8+ T-cells. Therefore, these therapies may result in adverse events, including severe GVHD. However, previous studies have demonstrated that adoptively transferred NK cells activated by these cytokines had GVL effect without life-threatening GVHD [49,50,51,52]. IL-15/IL-15Ra-Fc (ALT-803) therapy (NCT01885897), for instance, promoted an increase in CD8+ T-cells of the effector or effector memory phenotype without increasing Tregs, and no patient developed severe GVHD despite the induction of CD8+ T-cell activation [51]. One possible reason may be that the preferential expansion of NK cells mediates a reduction of GVHD by inhibiting CD8+ donor T-cell proliferation [53]. Although adoptive transfer of NK cells during allo-HSCT may be a promising therapy for AML, further studies are required in order to design protocols that balance the persistence of donor NK cells and host/donor T-cell activation. These studies must include the timing of transferred NK cells, NK cell dosage, combination with cytokines, the conditioning regimen, donor selection, and GVHD prophylaxis.
3. ICIs for Intensifying the Activation of NK Cells
NK cells express various co-inhibitory receptors, including killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs), NKG2A, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), T-cell immunoglobulin, and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), TIGIT, and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3). These receptors have recently been recognized as immune checkpoints (Figure 2 and Figure 4). T-cells also express these immune checkpoints in which PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) had greater expression than in NK cells (Figure 5) [54,55]. In order to block a receptor’s inhibitory signal, NK cell activation and leukemia cell killing are induced by a cognate ligand by ICIs. Therefore, administration of ICIs in the first few months post allo-HSCT might be a powerful tool for eradicating MRD following AML. Several clinical trials for ICIs as monotherapy or as part of combination treatment for AML after allo-HSCT have been reported recently [17,20,24,56,57,58]. CTLA-4 (e.g., ipilimumab) and PD-1 (e.g., nivolumab) blockade have been administered following allo-HSCT in several hematologic malignancies, and beneficial GVL responses have been achieved. However, serious immune-related adverse events and/or severe GVHD were accompanied by exposure to these two ICIs [59]. This might explain how increased donor-derived alloreactive T-cells might cause life-threatening GVHD [57,58]. It would be interesting to test whether NK cell-specific ICIs might enhance anti-leukemia activity without aggravating GVHD more than CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade.
NK cells express various immune checkpoint receptors such as KIR-2D, NKG2A, PD-1, CTLA-4, TIGIT, TIM-3, LAG-3, and BTLA, which can interact with their cognate ligands on tumor cells or on several immune cells. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can interrupt their receptor’s inhibitory signal.
IPH2101, also known as anti-KIR1-7F9 monoclonal antibody (mAb; lirilumab is a recombinant version of this mAb), blocks common inhibitory KIRs (KIR2DL/DS-1, -2, and -3), which bind to HLA-C alleles and augment NK cell-mediated killing in HLA-C-expressing leukemia cells [60]. Although this KIR2D blockade showed no clinical effectiveness [61] in a phase 2 trial in smoldering multiple myeloma (NCT01248455), adoptive transfer of NK cells combined with IPH2101 after allo-HSCT may have a therapeutic benefit. With lirilumab as with ICIs, CD94-NKG2A receptors on NK cells primarily recognize HLA-E, which is expressed by leukemia cells. Anti-NKG2A mAb (monalizumab) administration showed anti-leukemia effects in hematologic malignancies [62,63,64]. Previous studies have demonstrated that anti-NKG2A mAb can induce NKG2A+ NK cell killing activity against HLA-E-expressing leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo [62,63,64]. Additionally, reduced numbers of NKG2A+ NK cells after allo-HSCT are associated with the occurrence of severe GVHD [65,66]. Moreover, NKG2A+ NK cells inhibited T-cell proliferation and activation and might prevent GVHD [66]. Therefore, NKG2A+ NK cells may play a crucial role in GVHD and GVL effect following allo-HSCT, and monalizumab administration may have a promising clinical role following allo-HSCT.
TIGIT is expressed by both T and NK cells, and its ligands are the poliovirus receptors PVR (also known as CD155) and PVRL2 (also known as CD112) [30]. PVR is overexpressed in several tumors including AML, and its overexpression has been linked to a poor prognosis in AML [35,67,68]. Meanwhile, AML patients with higher TIGIT expression after allo-HSCT had an inferior prognosis [35]. Previous studies have shown that blockade of TIGIT could prevent the exhaustion of NK cells and enhance NK cell-dependent antitumor effect [20,69]. Additionally, CMV-induced adaptive NK cells had less TIGIT expression compared to conventional NK cells, and overcame myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC)-mediated immune suppression. The cytotoxic function of NK cells co-cultured with MDSCs against tumor cells could be restored by blockade of TIGIT [70]. Unlike PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, NK cells may play a critical role in TIGIT-based immunotherapy, and blockade of TIGIT may have therapeutic effects in GVL by controlling NK-cell activity after allo-HSCT. However, because blockade of TIGIT can also promote T-cell activity [71], it is imperative to optimize the clinical setting to prevent severe GVHD and intensify the GVL effect in AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT.
TIM-3 is expressed on all mature CD56dimCD16+ NK cells and activated immature CD56brightCD16− NK cells. Its ligand is galectin-9 [72], which induces interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production by NK cells [73]. TIM-3 blockade restores NK cell exhaustion and leads to an increased NK cell cytotoxicity in several cancers [74,75], whereas the TIM-3 antibody agonist leads to a decrease in the cytotoxicity of NK cells [72]. TIM-3 blockade reduces NK cell-mediated killing of pancreatic cancer cell lines [76]. Although a phase 1 study evaluating the blockade of TIM-3 (TSR-022) in advanced solid tumors is in progress (NCT02817633), further studies will be needed to determine the precise role of TIM-3 in AML after allo-HSCT.
LAG-3 (also known as CD223) is a ligand which has been identified as MHC class II. It is widely expressed not only on activated T and NK cells but also on dendritic and B-cells (Figure 5) [75,77,78]. LAG-3 is involved in inhibiting T-cell effector function, and blockade of LAG-3 promotes T-cell proliferation in vitro [79]. However, the function of LAG-3 on NK cells remains unclear. Blockade of LAG-3 had no effect on NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity [80]. Further investigation on the role of LAG-3 on NK cells is necessary.
BTLA (also known as CD272), which belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily, is expressed by most lymphocytes (Figure 5). BTLA acts as a negative modulator of immune responses regulating T-cell activation and proliferation [77,81,82]. Its ligand, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM, also known as TNFSF14), is expressed in several tumor cells [82,83]. Blocking BTLA-HVEM interaction leads to a decrease in suppressor T-cells in the tumor microenvironment and enhances antitumor immunity [84]. Additionally, BTLA blockade promotes an increase in NKT-cells and expression of cytotoxic marker genes [85]. However, the functional role of BTLA on NK cells is controversial and requires further investigation.
4. Bi/Trispecific Engagers and Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) NK Cells
Bispecific and trispecific killer cell engagers (BiKEs and TriKEs), which are composed of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) containing a variable heavy and variable light chain of an antibody, can specifically target both CD16 expressed on NK cells and tumor antigens (Figure 2). Previous studies have shown that NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity could occur by CD16 × CD33 (1633) BiKEs that ligated CD16 on NK cells and CD33 on tumor cells, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML [86,87]. Recently, 161533 TriKE, which is an NK-cell stimulatory cytokine with IL-15 added onto BiKE, has been found to restore NK cell proliferation and function through a low expression of TIGIT in NK cells. It is also able to enhance NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity against MDS cells more than 1633 BiKE [88]. Moreover, NK cells treated with 161533 TriKE can overcome immune suppression mediated by MDSCs. Although IL-15 also stimulates cytotoxic T-cells, 161533 TriKE induces the proliferation of NK cells with minimal effect on T-cells [87]. Therefore, the administration of this agent after allo-HSCT may be a potentially promising treatment to decrease relapse of AML after allo-HSCT with less T-cell-mediated GVHD.
Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) consist of scFv (extracellular domains) combined with CD3ζ, DAP10, or DAP12 as intracellular signal domains, and CD28, 4-1BB (also known as CD137), and 2B4 (also known as CD244) as costimulatory domains (Figure 2) [89,90,91,92,93]. In a murine allogeneic transplant model using donor-derived CD19-CAR T-cells, allogeneic CAR T-cells eliminated acute lymphoblastic leukemia [94]. However, its administration caused lethal GVHD. Additionally, CD123-redirected T-cells (CART123) eliminated AML and also eradicated normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in a mouse model because CD123 is highly expressed in HSC [95]. In a phase 1 clinical trial of CD33-CAR NK cells for relapsed and refractory AML patients (NCT02944162), the administration of CD33-CAR NK cells was not clinically efficacious [92]. Recently, cord blood-derived NK cells with CAR-CD19, IL-15, and inducible caspase-9-based suicide gene (iC9) (iC9/CAR.19/IL15-transduced CB-NK cells) enhanced their cytotoxicity against CD19-expressing tumors in a murine model [96]. CAR NK cells may provide a cost-effective treatment with a reduced risk of GVHD compared to CAR T-cells, but further clinical studies will be needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of CAR NK cells against AML following allo-HSCT.
5. AML Survival Mechanism against NK Cells
NK cell-based immunotherapies may emerge as a promising option for elimination of AML following allo-HSCT, but several factors may limit NK cell-based immunotherapies (Figure 3) [97,98,99]. For instance, the tumor microenvironment, which includes Tregs, tumor-associated macrophages, and MDSCs, which interfere with the function of NK cells, is a major limitation to the effectiveness of NK cells [70,87,100,101]. In addition, the tumor microenvironment possesses increased anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as TGF-β, IL-4, and IL-10, which cause immune evasion and result in decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ and IL-15, which stimulate NK cell activation [51,99,102]. Moreover, leukemia cells produce several enzymes such as indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1, arginase, prostaglandin-E2, CD39, and CD73, which reduce NK-cell proliferation and/or activity [98,99,100,103,104,105,106].
The incidence of HLA loss following allo-HCT is one of the major immune escape mechanisms that lead to relapse in AML, and may account for approximately one third of all relapses [107]. Because loss of mismatched HLA through copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity results in the elimination of the incompatible HLA alleles while keeping the expression of HLA class I molecules, cytotoxic killing by NK cells does not occur. Also, recent studies have shown that the downregulation of HLA class II molecules (HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DRB1) and their related molecules (CIITA, IFI30, HLA-DMA, HLA-DMB, and CD74) could allow leukemia relapse after allo-HSCT [108].
Patients who exhibited a high expression of CD200, CD47, PD-L1, PVR, or PVRL2, which is associated with an immune response or immune checkpoints, had a poor prognosis [35,67,109,110,111]. In addition to PD-1, exhausted T-cells, including exhausted CD8+ T-cells, express inhibitory receptors such as CTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIM-3 [21,112,113]. T-cell exhaustion contributes to AML relapse after allo-HSCT [113]. In contrast to T-cell exhaustion, expression of activating NKG2D ligands such as MHC class I-related chain A (MICA) and UL16-binding protein 1 (ULBP1) on AML cells at diagnosis is associated with an improved OS and a reduced incidence of relapse [114]. Activated NKG2D on NK cells recognizes NKG2D ligands (MICA/B and ULBPs) and enables the induction of NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity on AML cells [115,116]. AML cells which express low levels of NKG2D ligands are able to evade immune surveillance by NK cells [115].
Janus kinase (JAK) mutations affect the interferon (IFN) signaling pathway by inducing an increase in STAT1 expression, the loss of beta-2-microglobulin, which can detect HLA class I antigen processing, and the loss of PTEN, which increases the production of immunosuppressive cytokines such as VEGF and can increase STAT3 expression. These mutations, which represent various mechanisms of resistance to ICIs, have been reported in several cancers [117,118,119,120], but it remains unknown in the case of AML. These studies demonstrated the association between T-cell activity and resistance to ICIs. However, the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs on NK cells are less well explored and require further elucidation.
6. Conclusions
Currently, there are numerous NK cell-based immunotherapies for AML post allo-HSCT that have been incorporated into pre-clinical and clinical trials. We have described some clinical trials associated with NK cell-based immunotherapies (Table 1). NK cell immunotherapies such as adoptive NK cells, cytokine-based therapies, ICIs, and bi/trispecific engagers have the potential to significantly enhance conventional therapies for the elimination of AML after allo-HSCT. In the future, combinations of these approaches require to be optimized to further enforce donor NK-cell mediated GVL in AML patients who received allo-HSCT. Moreover, for the next generation of NK-cell immunotherapies, therapeutic approaches based on CAR-engineered NK cells, memory-like NK cells, NKT-cells, and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived NK cells may be considered in a future study [49,89,121,122,123,124]. However, particularly with the use of ICIs, especially PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade, after allo-HSCT, there is a distinct need for caution due to the risk of GVHD-related mortality. These ICIs appear to promote T-cell activity more than NK-cell activity against leukemia cells. Well-designed clinical trials should be required to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of these therapies. In addition, because NK cells have a short lifespan compared to T-cells, further improvements in manufacturing and expansion techniques are needed. Previously, immunotherapies had primarily focused on T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Thus, some mechanisms for NK-cell immunotherapies, including immune escape of AML, remain unclear. Further studies will be needed to predict which type of AML after allo-HSCT will be affected by NK-cell immunotherapies. The collection of large patient series and datasets will allow the investigation of the various factors which may potentially influence NK-cell immune responses. These factors will include the expression genes, mutations, alterations of resistance to immunotherapies in leukemia cells, tumor microenvironment consisting of Tregs, tumor-associated macrophages, MDSCs, and the production of cytokines.
Table 1.
Adoptive NK Cells | ||||||
Clinical Trial | Cytokines | Disease | Phase | Status | allo-HSCT | |
NCT02229266 | IL-2 | AML | II | Recruiting | ||
NCT00394381 | IL-2 | AML, MDS | I/II | Completed | yes | |
NCT01370213 | IL-2 | AML, MDS | II | Unknown | yes | |
NCT01947322 | IL-2 | AML | I/II | Completed | yes | |
NCT03068819 | IL12, IL15, IL18 | AML | I | Recruiting | yes | |
NCT02782546 | ALT-803 (IL-15) | AML | II | Recruiting | yes | |
NCT02890758 | ALT-803 (IL-15) | HMs, solid tumors | I | Recruiting | ||
NCT00460694 | IL-2 | HMs | I/II | Completed | yes | |
NCT01823198 | IL-2 | HMs | I/II | Recruiting | yes | |
NCT02809092 | IL-21 | AML | I/II | Recruiting | ||
NCT03300492 | - | AML, MDS | I/II | Recruiting | yes | |
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors | ||||||
Clinical Trial | Target | Disease | Phase | Status | allo-HSCT | |
IPH2101 | ||||||
NCT01256073 | KIR | AML | I | Completed | ||
IPH2102 | ||||||
NCT01687387 | KIR | AML | II | Completed | ||
Lirilumab | ||||||
NCT01687387 | KIR2D | AML | II | Completed | ||
NCT02399917 | KIR2D | AML | II | Completed | ||
Monalizumab | ||||||
NCT02921685 | NKG2A | HMs | I | Recruiting | yes | |
Nivolumab | ||||||
NCT03600155 | PD-1 and CTLA-4 | AML | I | Recruiting | yes | |
NCT02846376 | PD-1 and/or CTLA-4 | AML, MDS | I | Recruiting | yes | |
NCT01822509 | PD-1 or CTLA-4 | HMs | I | Active, not recruiting | yes | |
Pembrolizumab | ||||||
NCT02981914 | PD-1 | AML, MDS, ML | I | Recruiting | yes | |
Atezolizumab | ||||||
NCT02862275 | PD-L1 | HMs, solid tumors | I | Recruiting | ||
Avelumab | ||||||
NCT02953561 | PD-L1 | AML | I/II | Recruiting | ||
Durvalumab | ||||||
NCT02775903 | PD-L1 | AML, MDS | II | Active, not recruiting | ||
Ipilimumab | ||||||
NCT03912064 | CTLA-4 | AML, MDS | I | Not yet recruiting | yes | |
NCT00060372 | CTLA-4 | AML, solid tumors | I | Completed | yes | |
OMP-313M32 | ||||||
NCT03119428 | TIGIT | solid tumors | I | Active, not recruiting | ||
MTIG7192A | ||||||
NCT03563716 | TIGIT and PD-L1 | solid tumors | II | Active, not recruiting | ||
AB154 | ||||||
NCT03628677 | TIGIT | solid tumors | I | Recruiting | ||
TSR-022 | ||||||
NCT02817633 | TIM-3 and PD-1 | solid tumors | II | Not yet recruiting | ||
NCT02817633 | TIM-3 | solid tumors | I | Recruiting | ||
MBG453 | ||||||
NCT03066648 | TIM-3 | AML, MDS | I | Recruiting | ||
BMS-986016/BMS-936558 | ||||||
NCT02061761 | LAG-3 | ML | I/II | Recruiting | ||
Sym022 | ||||||
NCT03489369 | LAG-3 | ML, solid tumors | I | Recruiting | ||
NK Cell Engagers | ||||||
Clinical Trial | Target | Disease | Phase | Status | ||
TriKEs | ||||||
NCT03214666 | CD16/IL-15/CD33 | AML, MDS | I/II | Not yet recruiting | ||
CAR-NK Cells | ||||||
Clinical Trial | Target | Disease | Phase | Status | Origin of NK Cells | |
NCT02742727 | CD7 | AML, ALL, ML | I/II | Unknown | NK-92 | |
NCT02944162 | CD33 | AML | I/II | Unknown | NK-92 | |
NCT03579927 | CD19 | ML | I/II | Not yet recruiting | UCB | |
NCT03056339 | CD19 | ALL, ML | I/II | Recruiting | UCB | |
NCT02892695 | CD19 | ALL, ML | I/II | Recruiting | NK-92 | |
NCT01974479 | CD19 | ALL | I | Suspended | Haploidentical donor NK cells | |
NCT00995137 | CD19 | ALL | I | Completed | Expanded donor NK cells |
Abbreviations: allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; HMs, hematological malignancies; ML, malignant lymphoma; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Abbreviations
allo-HSCT | allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
AML | acute myeloid leukemia |
GVL | graft-versus-leukemia |
NK | Natural killer |
MRD | minimal residual disease |
DLI | Donor lymphocyte infusion |
ICIs | immune checkpoint inhibitors |
HLA | human leukocyte antigen |
TIGIT | T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domains |
GVHD | graft versus host disease |
OS | overall survival |
Tregs | T-regulatory cells |
CR | complete remission |
KIRs | killer immunoglobulin-like receptors |
PD-1 | programmed cell death protein 1 |
CTLA-4 | cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 |
TIM-3 | T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 |
LAG-3 | lymphocyte activation gene 3 |
BTLA | B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator |
MDSC | myeloid-derived suppressor cell |
HVEM | herpesvirus entry mediator |
BiKEs | bispecific killer cell engagers |
TriKEs | trispecific killer cell engagers |
MDS | myelodysplastic syndromes |
CARs | chimeric antigen receptors |
HSCs | hematopoietic stem cells |
MICA | MHC class I-related chain A |
ULBP1 | UL16-binding protein 1 |
HSC_BM | hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow |
early HPC_BM | hematopoietic progenitor cells from bone marrow |
CMP | common myeloid progenitor cell |
GMP | granulocyte monocyte progenitors |
MEP | megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor cell |
PM_BM | promyelocyte from bone marrow |
MY_BM | myelocyte from bone marrow |
PMN_BM | polymorphonuclear cells from bone marrow |
PMN_PB | polymorphonuclear cells from peripheral blood |
B-cells | CD19+ B-cells |
NK cells | CD56+ natural killer cells |
mDC | CD11c+ myeloid dendritic cells |
pDC | CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells |
HMs | hematological malignancies |
ML | malignant lymphoma |
ALL | acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
JAK | Janus kinase |
IFN | interferon |
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Schmid C., Labopin M., Nagler A., Niederwieser D., Castagna L., Tabrizi R., Stadler M., Kuball J., Cornelissen J., Vorlicek J., et al. Treatment, risk factors, and outcome of adults with relapsed AML after reduced intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;119:1599–1606. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-375840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bejanyan N., Weisdorf D.J., Logan B.R., Wang H.L., Devine S.M., de Lima M., Bunjes D.W., Zhang M.J. Survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A center for international blood and marrow transplant research study. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schroeder T., Rachlis E., Bug G., Stelljes M., Klein S., Steckel N.K., Wolf D., Ringhoffer M., Czibere A., Nachtkamp K., et al. Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusions—A retrospective multicenter analysis from the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:653–660. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vyas P., Appelbaum F.R., Craddock C. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tsirigotis P., Byrne M., Schmid C., Baron F., Ciceri F., Esteve J., Gorin N.C., Giebel S., Mohty M., Savani B.N., et al. Relapse of AML after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Methods of monitoring and preventive strategies. A review from the ALWP of the EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:1431–1438. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kassim A.A., Savani B.N. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: A review. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Ther. 2017;10:245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2017.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Getta B.M., Devlin S.M., Levine R.L., Arcila M.E., Mohanty A.S., Zehir A., Tallman M.S., Giralt S.A., Roshal M. Multicolor flow cytometry and multigene next-generation sequencing are complementary and highly predictive for relapse in acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23:1064–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leung W., Pui C.H., Coustan-Smith E., Yang J., Pei D., Gan K., Srinivasan A., Hartford C., Triplett B.M., Dallas M., et al. Detectable minimal residual disease before hematopoietic cell transplantation is prognostic but does not preclude cure for children with very-high-risk leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:468–472. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-409813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walter R.B., Gooley T.A., Wood B.L., Milano F., Fang M., Sorror M.L., Estey E.H., Salter A.I., Lansverk E., Chien J.W., et al. Impact of pretransplantation minimal residual disease, as detected by multiparametric flow cytometry, on outcome of myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:1190–1197. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.8121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thanarajasingam G., Kim H.T., Cutler C., Ho V.T., Koreth J., Alyea E.P., Antin J.H., Soiffer R.J., Armand P. Outcome and prognostic factors for patients who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:1713–1718. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Orti G., Barba P., Fox L., Salamero O., Bosch F., Valcarcel D. Donor lymphocyte infusions in AML and MDS: Enhancing the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Exp. Hematol. 2017;48:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jedlickova Z., Schmid C., Koenecke C., Hertenstein B., Baurmann H., Schwerdtfeger R., Tischer J., Kolb H.J., Schleuning M. Long-term results of adjuvant donor lymphocyte transfusion in AML after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:663–667. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bacchetta R., Lucarelli B., Sartirana C., Gregori S., Lupo Stanghellini M.T., Miqueu P., Tomiuk S., Hernandez-Fuentes M., Gianolini M.E., Greco R., et al. Immunological outcome in haploidentical-HSC Transplanted Patients treated with IL-10-anergized donor T-cells. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:16. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Platzbecker U., Wermke M., Radke J., Oelschlaegel U., Seltmann F., Kiani A., Klut I.M., Knoth H., Röllig C., Schetelig J., et al. Azacitidine for treatment of imminent relapse in MDS or AML patients after allogeneic HSCT: Results of the RELAZA trial. Leukemia. 2012;26:381–389. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Craddock C., Jilani N., Siddique S., Yap C., Khan J., Nagra S., Ward J., Ferguson P., Hazlewood P., Buka R., et al. Tolerability and clinical activity of post-transplantation azacitidine in patients allografted for acute myeloid leukemia treated on the RICAZA Trial. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:385–390. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Platzbecker U., Middeke J.M., Sockel K., Herbst R., Wolf D., Baldus C.D., Oelschlägel U., Mütherig A., Fransecky L., Noppeney R., et al. Measurable residual disease-guided treatment with azacitidine to prevent haematological relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia (RELAZA2): An open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1668–1679. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30580-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Armand P. Immune checkpoint blockade in hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2015;125:3393–3400. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-02-567453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dietz A.C., Wayne A.S. Cells to prevent/treat relapse following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2017;2017:708–715. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Przespolewski A., Szeles A., Wang E.S. Advances in immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Future Oncol. 2018;14:963–978. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cooley S., Parham P., Miller J.S. Strategies to activate NK cells to prevent relapse and induce remission following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2018;131:1053–1062. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-08-752170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wong E., Davis J.E., Grigg A., Szer J., Ritchie D. Strategies to enhance the graft versus tumour effect after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0244-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Blazar B.R., MacDonald K.P.A., Hill G.R. Immune regulatory cell infusion for graft-versus-host disease prevention and therapy. Blood. 2018;131:2651–2660. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-11-785865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Falkenburg F., Ruggiero E., Bonini C., Porter D., Miller J., Malard F., Mohty M., Kröger N., Kolb H.J. Prevention and treatment of relapse after stem cell transplantation by cellular therapies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54:26–34. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0227-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hobo W., Hutten T.J.A., Schaap N.P.M., Dolstra H. Immune checkpoint molecules in acute myeloid leukaemia: Managing the double-edged sword. Br. J. Haematol. 2018;181:38–53. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rotte A., Jin J.Y., Lemaire V. Mechanistic overview of immune checkpoints to support the rational design of their combinations in cancer immunotherapy. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:71–83. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li X., Shao C., Shi Y., Han W. Lessons learned from the blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018;11:31. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0578-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jenkins R.W., Barbie D.A., Flaherty K.T. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;118:9–16. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gide T.N., Wilmott J.S., Scolyer R.A., Long G.V. Primary and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:1260–1270. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.O’Donnell J.S., Teng M.W.L., Smyth M.J. Cancer immunoediting and resistance to T-cell-based immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019;16:151–167. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0142-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Leung W. Use of NK cell activity in cure by transplant. Br. J. Haematol. 2011;155:14–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.He Y., Tian Z. NK cell education via nonclassical MHC and non-MHC ligands. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2017;14:321–330. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2016.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holtan S.G., Pasquini M., Weisdorf D.J. Acute graft-versus-host disease: A bench-to-bedside update. Blood. 2014;124:363–373. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-514786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shaffer B.C., Hsu K.C. How important is NK alloreactivity and KIR in allogeneic transplantation? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2016;29:351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2016.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hattori N., Saito B., Sasaki Y., Shimada S., Murai S., Abe M., Baba Y., Watanuki M., Fujiwara S., Kawaguchi Y., et al. Status of natural killer cell recovery in Day 21 bone marrow after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predicts clinical outcome. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24:1841–1847. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hattori N., Kawaguchi Y., Sasaki Y., Shimada S., Murai S., Abe M., Baba Y., Watanuki M., Fujiwara S., Arai N., et al. Monitoring TIGIT/DNAM-1 and PVR/PVRL2 immune checkpoint expression levels in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim S.Y., Lee H., Han M.S., Shim H., Eom H.S., Park B., Kong S.Y. Post-transplantation natural killer cell count: A predictor of acute graft-versus-host disease and survival outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016;16:527–535. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Minculescu L., Marquart H.V., Friis L.S., Petersen S.L., Schiødt I., Ryder L.P., Andersen N.S., Sengeloev H. Early natural killer cell reconstitution predicts overall survival in T-cell-replete allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:2187–2193. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Passweg J.R., Tichelli A., Meyer-Monard S., Heim D., Stern M., Kühne T., Favre G., Gratwohl A. Purified donor NK-lymphocyte infusion to consolidate engraftment after haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2004;18:1835–1838. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yoon S.R., Lee Y.S., Yang S.H., Ahn K.H., Lee J.H., Lee J.H., Kim D.Y., Kang Y.A., Jeon M., Seol M., et al. Generation of donor natural killer cells from CD34+ progenitor cells and subsequent infusion after HLA-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A feasibility study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:1038–1046. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stern M., Passweg J.R., Meyer-Monard S., Esser R., Tonn T., Soerensen J., Paulussen M., Gratwohl A., Klingebiel T., Bader P., et al. Pre-emptive immunotherapy with purified natural killer cells after haploidentical SCT: A prospective phase II study in two centers. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:433–438. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Choi I., Yoon S.R., Park S.Y., Kim H., Jung S.J., Jang Y.J., Kang M., Yeom Y.I., Lee J.L., Kim D.Y., et al. Donor-derived natural killer cells infused after human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation: A dose-escalation study. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:696–704. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Choi I., Yoon S.R., Park S.Y., Kim H., Jung S.J., Kang Y.L., Lee J.H., Lee J.H., Kim D.Y., Lee J.L., et al. Donor-derived natural killer cell infusion after human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with refractory acute leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:2065–2076. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Björklund A.T., Carlsten M., Sohlberg E., Liu L.L., Clancy T., Karimi M., Cooley S., Miller J.S., Klimkowska M., Schaffer M., et al. Complete remission with Reduction of High-Risk Clones following haploidentical NK-Cell Therapy against MDS and AML. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:1834–1844. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dolstra H., Roeven M.W.H., Spanholtz J., Hangalapura B.N., Tordoir M., Maas F., Leenders M., Bohme F., Kok N., Trilsbeek C., et al. Successful transfer of umbilical cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor-derived NK cells in older acute myeloid leukemia patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:4107–4118. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Miller J.S., Soignier Y., Panoskaltsis-Mortari A., McNearney S.A., Yun G.H., Fautsch S.K., McKenna D., Le C., Defor T.E., Burns L.J., et al. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood. 2005;105:3051–3057. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rubnitz J.E., Inaba H., Ribeiro R.C., Pounds S., Rooney B., Bell T., Pui C.H., Leung W. NKAML: A pilot study to determine the safety and feasibility of haploidentical natural killer cell transplantation in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:955–959. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bachanova V., Cooley S., Defor T.E., Verneris M.R., Zhang B., McKenna D.H., Curtsinger J., Panoskaltsis-Mortari A., Lewis D., Hippen K., et al. Clearance of acute myeloid leukemia by haploidentical natural killer cells is improved using IL-2 diphtheria toxin fusion protein. Blood. 2014;123:3855–3863. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-532531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Curti A., Ruggeri L., Parisi S., Bontadini A., Dan E., Motta M.R., Rizzi S., Trabanelli S., Ocadlikova D., Lecciso M., et al. Larger size of donor alloreactive NK cell repertoire correlates with better response to NK cell immunotherapy in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:1914–1921. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Romee R., Rosario M., Berrien-Elliott M.M., Wagner J.A., Jewell B.A., Schappe T., Leong J.W., Abdel-Latif S., Schneider S.E., Willey S., et al. Cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells exhibit enhanced responses against myeloid leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:357ra123. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Song Y., Hu B., Liu Y., Jin Z., Zhang Y., Lin D., Zhu Y., Lei L., Gong H., Mei Y., et al. IL-12/IL-18-preactivated donor NK cells enhance GVL effects and mitigate GvHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018;48:670–682. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Romee R., Cooley S., Berrien-Elliott M.M., Westervelt P., Verneris M.R., Wagner J.E., Weisdorf D.J., Blazar B.R., Ustun C., DeFor T.E., et al. First-in-human phase 1 clinical study of the IL-15 superagonist complex ALT-803 to treat relapse after transplantation. Blood. 2018;131:2515–2527. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-12-823757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ciurea S.O., Schafer J.R., Bassett R., Denman C.J., Cao K., Willis D., Rondon G., Chen J., Soebbing D., Kaur I., et al. Phase 1 clinical trial using mbIL21 ex vivo-expanded donor-derived NK cells after haploidentical transplantation. Blood. 2017;130:1857–1868. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-785659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Olson J.A., Leveson-Gower D.B., Gill S., Baker J., Beilhack A., Negrin R.S. NK cells mediate reduction of GVHD by inhibiting activated, alloreactive T-cells while retaining GVT effects. Blood. 2010;115:4293–4301. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-222190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bagger F.O., Rapin N., Theilgaard-Mönch K., Kaczkowski B., Thoren L.A., Jendholm J., Winther O., Porse B.T. HemaExplorer: A database of mRNA expression profiles in normal and malignant haematopoiesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013:D1034–D1039. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bagger F.O., Rapin N., Theilgaard-Mönch K., Kaczkowski B., Jendholm J., Winther O., Porse B. HemaExplorer: A Web server for easy and fast visualization of gene expression in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Blood. 2012;119:6394–6395. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-427310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bashey A., Medina B., Corringham S., Pasek M., Carrier E., Vrooman L., Lowy I., Solomon S.R., Morris L.E., Holland H.K., et al. CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab to treat relapse of malignancy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2009;113:1581–1588. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhou J., Bashey A., Zhong R., Corringham S., Messer K., Pu M., Ma W., Chut T., Soiffer R., Mitrovich R.C., et al. CTLA-4 blockade following relapse of malignancy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with T-cell activation but not with increased levels of T regulatory cells. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:682–692. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Davids M.S., Kim H.T., Bachireddy P., Costello C., Liguori R., Savell A., Lukez A.P., Avigan D., Chen Y.B., McSweeney P., et al. Ipilimumab for patients with relapse after allogeneic transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:143–153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ijaz A., Khan A.Y., Malik S.U., Faridi W., Fraz M.A., Usman M., Tariq M.J., Durer S., Durer C., Russ A., et al. Significant risk of graft-versus-host disease with exposure to checkpoint inhibitors before and after allogeneic transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Romagné F., André P., Spee P., Zahn S., Anfossi N., Gauthier L., Capanni M., Ruggeri L., Benson D.M., Jr., Blaser B.W., et al. Preclinical characterization of 1-7F9, a novel human anti-KIR receptor therapeutic antibody that augments natural killer-mediated killing of tumor cells. Blood. 2009;114:2667–2677. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-206532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Korde N., Carlsten M., Lee M.J., Minter A., Tan E., Kwok M., Manasanch E., Bhutani M., Tageja N., Roschewski M., et al. A phase II trial of pan-KIR2D blockade with IPH2101 in smoldering multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2014;99:e81–e83. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.103085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nguyen S., Dhedin N., Vernant J.P., Kuentz M., Al Jijakli A., Rouas-Freiss N., Carosella E.D., Boudifa A., Debré P., Vieillard V. NK-cell reconstitution after haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantations: Immaturity of NK cells and inhibitory effect of NKG2A override GvL effect. Blood. 2005;105:4135–4142. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-10-4113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Godal R., Bachanova V., Gleason M., McCullar V., Yun G.H., Cooley S., Verneris M.R., McGlave P.B., Miller J.S. Natural killer cell killing of acute myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia blasts by killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor-negative natural killer cells after NKG2A and LIR-1 blockade. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:612–621. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ruggeri L., Urbani E., André P., Mancusi A., Tosti A., Topini F., Bléry M., Animobono L., Romagné F., Wagtmann N., et al. Effects of anti-NKG2A antibody administration on leukemia and normal hematopoietic cells. Haematologica. 2016;101:626–633. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.135301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kordelas L., Steckel N.K., Horn P.A., Beelen D.W., Rebmann V. The activating NKG2C receptor is significantly reduced in NK cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with severe graft-versus-host disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016;17:1797. doi: 10.3390/ijms17111797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hu L.J., Zhao X.Y., Yu X.X., Lv M., Han T.T., Han W., Huang X.J. Quantity and quality reconstitution of NKG2A+ natural killer cells are associated with graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Stamm H., Klingler F., Grossjohann E.M., Muschhammer J., Vettorazzi E., Heuser M., Mock U., Thol F., Vohwinkel G., Latuske E., et al. Immune checkpoints PVR and PVRL2 are prognostic markers in AML and their blockade represents a new therapeutic option. Oncogene. 2018;37:5269–5280. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0288-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gao J., Zheng Q., Xin N., Wang W., Zhao C. CD155, an onco-immunologic molecule in human tumors. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:1934–1938. doi: 10.1111/cas.13324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhang Q., Bi J., Zheng X., Chen Y., Wang H., Wu W., Wang Z., Wu Q., Peng H., Wei H., et al. Blockade of the checkpoint receptor TIGIT prevents NK cell exhaustion and elicits potent antitumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19:723–732. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sarhan D., Cichocki F., Zhang B., Yingst A., Spellman S.R., Cooley S., Verneris M.R., Blazar B.R., Miller J.S. Adaptive NK cells with low TIGIT expression are inherently resistant to myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2016;76:5696–5706. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Johnston R.J., Comps-Agrar L., Hackney J., Yu X., Huseni M., Yang Y., Park S., Javinal V., Chiu H., Irving B., et al. The immunoreceptor TIGIT regulates antitumor and antiviral CD8(+) T-cell effector function. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:923–937. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ndhlovu L.C., Lopez-Vergès S., Barbour J.D., Jones R.B., Jha A.R., Long B.R., Schoeffler E.C., Fujita T., Nixon D.F., Lanier L.L. Tim-3 marks human natural killer cell maturation and suppresses cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Blood. 2012;119:3734–3743. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-392951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gleason M.K., Lenvik T.R., McCullar V., Felices M., O’Brien M.S., Cooley S.A., Verneris M.R., Cichocki F., Holman C.J., Panoskaltsis-Mortari A., et al. Tim-3 is an inducible human natural killer cell receptor that enhances interferon gamma production in response to galectin-9. Blood. 2012;119:3064–3072. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-360321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gallois A., Silva I., Osman I., Bhardwaj N. Reversal of natural killer cell exhaustion by TIM-3 blockade. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3:e946365. doi: 10.4161/21624011.2014.946365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kim N., Kim H.S. Targeting checkpoint receptors and molecules for therapeutic modulation of natural killer cells. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:2041. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Van Audenaerde J.R.M., De Waele J., Marcq E., Van Loenhout J., Lion E., Van den Bergh J.M.J., Jesenofsky R., Masamune A., Roeyen G., Pauwels P., et al. Interleukin-15 stimulates natural killer cell-mediated killing of both human pancreatic cancer and stellate cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:56968–56979. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Torphy R.J., Schulick R.D., Zhu Y. Newly emerging immune checkpoints: Promises for future cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2642. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Beldi-Ferchiou A., Caillat-Zucman S. Control of NK cell activation by immune checkpoint molecules. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2129. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Maçon-Lemaître L., Triebel F. The negative regulatory function of the lymphocyte-activation gene-3 co-receptor (CD223) on human T-cells. Immunology. 2005;115:170–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02145.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Huard B., Tournier M., Triebel F. LAG-3 does not define a specific mode of natural killing in human. Immunol. Lett. 1998;61:109–112. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(97)00170-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Krieg C., Boyman O., Fu Y.X., Kaye J. B and T lymphocyte attenuator regulates CD8+ T-cell-intrinsic homeostasis and memory cell generation. Nat. Immunol. 2007;8:162–171. doi: 10.1038/ni1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Le Mercier I., Lines J.L., Noelle R.J. Beyond CTLA-4 and PD-1, the generation Z of negative checkpoint regulators. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:418. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gertner-Dardenne J., Fauriat C., Orlanducci F., Thibult M.L., Pastor S., Fitzgibbon J., Bouabdallah R., Xerri L., Olive D. The co-receptor BTLA negatively regulates human Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell proliferation: A potential way of immune escape for lymphoma cells. Blood. 2013;122:922–931. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-11-464685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Han L., Wang W., Fang Y., Feng Z., Liao S., Li W., Li Y., Li C., Maitituoheti M., Dong H., et al. Soluble B and T lymphocyte attenuator possesses antitumor effects and facilitates heat shock protein 70 vaccine-triggered antitumor immunity against a murine TC-1 cervical cancer model in vivo. J. Immunol. 2009;183:7842–7850. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sekar D., Govene L., Del Río M.L., Sirait-Fischer E., Fink A.F., Brüne B., Rodriguez-Barbosa J.I., Weigert A. Downregulation of BTLA on NKT-cells promotes tumor immune control in a mouse model of mammary carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:752. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gleason M.K., Ross J.A., Warlick E.D., Lund T.C., Verneris M.R., Wiernik A., Spellman S., Haagenson M.D., Lenvik A.J., Litzow M.R., et al. CD16 × CD33 bispecific killer cell engager (BiKE) activates NK cells against primary MDS and MDSC CD33+ targets. Blood. 2014;123:3016–3026. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-533398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Vallera D.A., Felices M., McElmurry R., McCullar V., Zhou X., Schmohl J.U., Zhang B., Lenvik A.J., Panoskaltsis-Mortari A., Verneris M.R., et al. IL15 trispecific killer engagers (TriKE) make natural killer cells specific to CD33+ targets while Also Inducing Persistence, In Vivo Expansion, and Enhanced Function. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:3440–3450. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sarhan D., Brandt L., Felices M., Guldevall K., Lenvik T., Hinderlie P., Curtsinger J., Warlick E., Spellman S.R., Blazar B.R., et al. 161533 TriKE stimulates NK-cell function to overcome myeloid-derived suppressor cells in MDS. Blood Adv. 2018;2:1459–1469. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017012369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hu Y., Tian Z.G., Zhang C. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-transduced natural killer cells in tumor immunotherapy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018;39:167–176. doi: 10.1038/aps.2017.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Oberschmidt O., Kloess S., Koehl U. Redirected primary human chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cells as an ‘off-the-shelf immunotherapy’ for improvement in cancer treatment. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:654. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Demoulin B., Cook W.J., Murad J., Graber D.J., Sentman M.L., Lonez C., Gilham D.E., Sentman C.L., Agaugue S. Exploiting natural killer group 2D receptors for CAR T-cell therapy. Future Oncol. 2017;13:1593–1605. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Tang X., Yang L., Li Z., Nalin A.P., Dai H., Xu T., Yin J., You F., Zhu M., Shen W., et al. First-in-man clinical trial of CAR NK-92 cells: Safety test of CD33-CAR NK-92 cells in patients with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018;8:1083–1089. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zhang J., Zheng H., Diao Y. Natural killer cells and current applications of chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK-92 cells in tumor immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:317. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Jacoby E., Yang Y., Qin H., Chien C.D., Kochenderfer J.N., Fry T.J. Murine allogeneic CD19 CAR T-cells harbor potent antileukemic activity but have the potential to mediate lethal GVHD. Blood. 2016;127:1361–1370. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-664250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gill S., Tasian S.K., Ruella M., Shestova O., Li Y., Porter D.L., Carroll M., Danet-Desnoyers G., Scholler J., Grupp S.A., et al. Preclinical targeting of human acute myeloid leukemia and myeloablation using chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cells. Blood. 2014;123:2343–2354. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-529537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Liu E., Tong Y., Dotti G., Shaim H., Savoldo B., Mukherjee M., Orange J., Wan X., Lu X., Reynolds A., et al. Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity. Leukemia. 2018;32:520–531. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Martín-Antonio B., Suñe G., Perez-Amill L., Castella M., Urbano-Ispizua A. Natural killer cells: Angels and devils for immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1868. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Daher M., Rezvani K. Next generation natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: The promise of genetic engineering. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2018;51:146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2018.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Zeiser R., Vago L. Mechanisms of immune escape after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2018 doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-846824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Murray S., Lundqvist A. Targeting the tumor microenvironment to improve natural killer cell-based immunotherapies: On being in the right place at the right time, with resilience. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2016;12:607–611. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1096458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sabry M., Lowdell M.W. Tumor-primed NK cells: Waiting for the green light. Front. Immunol. 2013;4:408. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.DiLillo D.J., Weinberg J.B., Yoshizaki A., Horikawa M., Bryant J.M., Iwata Y., Matsushita T., Matta K.M., Chen Y., Venturi G.M., et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and regulatory B-cells share IL-10 competence and immunosuppressive function. Leukemia. 2013;27:170–182. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Folgiero V., Goffredo B.M., Filippini P., Masetti R., Bonanno G., Caruso R., Bertaina V., Mastronuzzi A., Gaspari S., Zecca M., et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) activity in leukemia blasts correlates with poor outcome in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget. 2014;5:2052–2064. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Morvan M.G., Lanier L.L. NK cells and cancer: You can teach innate cells new tricks. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2016;16:7–19. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2015.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zhang J., Han X., Hu X., Jin F., Gao Z., Yin L., Qin J., Yin F., Li C., Wang Y. IDO1 impairs NK cell cytotoxicity by decreasing NKG2D/NKG2DLs via promoting miR-18a. Mol. Immunol. 2018;103:144–155. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Häusler S.F., Montalbán del Barrio I., Strohschein J., Chandran P.A., Engel J.B., Hönig A., Ossadnik M., Horn E., Fischer B., Krockenberger M., et al. Ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 on OvCA cells are potent adenosine-generating enzymes responsible for adenosine receptor 2A-dependent suppression of T-cell function and NK cell cytotoxicity. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2011;60:1405–1418. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1040-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Vago L., Perna S.K., Zanussi M., Mazzi B., Barlassina C., Stanghellini M.T., Perrelli N.F., Cosentino C., Torri F., Angius A., et al. Loss of mismatched HLA in leukemia after stem-cell transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:478–488. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0811036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Christopher M.J., Petti A.A., Rettig M.P., Miller C.A., Chendamarai E., Duncavage E.J., Klco J.M., Helton N.M., O’Laughlin M., Fronick C.C., et al. Immune escape of relapsed AML cells after allogeneic transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:2330–2341. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Damiani D., Tiribelli M., Raspadori D., Sirianni S., Meneghel A., Cavalllin M., Michelutti A., Toffoletti E., Geromin A., Simeone E., et al. Clinical impact of CD200 expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and correlation with other molecular prognostic factors. Oncotarget. 2015;6:30212–30221. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Majeti R., Chao M.P., Alizadeh A.A., Pang W.W., Jaiswal S., Gibbs K.D., Jr., van Rooijen N., Weissman I.L. CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor and therapeutic antibody target on human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell. 2009;138:286–299. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zajac M., Zaleska J., Dolnik A., Bullinger L., Giannopoulos K. Expression of CD274 (PD-L1) is associated with unfavourable recurrent mutations in AML. Br. J. Haematol. 2018;183:822–825. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wherry E.J., Kurachi M. Molecular and cellular insights into T-cell exhaustion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015;15:486–499. doi: 10.1038/nri3862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kong Y., Zhang J., Claxton D.F., Ehmann W.C., Rybka W.B., Zhu L., Zeng H., Schell T.D., Zheng H. PD-1(hi)TIM-3+ T-cells associate with and predict leukemia relapse in AML patients post allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e330. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Mastaglio S., Wong E., Perera T., Ripley J., Blombery P., Smyth M.J., Koldej R., Ritchie D. Natural killer receptor ligand expression on acute myeloid leukemia impacts survival and relapse after chemotherapy. Blood Adv. 2018;2:335–346. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017015230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Nowbakht P., Ionescu M.C., Rohner A., Kalberer C.P., Rossy E., Mori L., Cosman D., De Libero G., Wodnar-Filipowicz A. Ligands for natural killer cell-activating receptors are expressed upon the maturation of normal myelomonocytic cells but at low levels in acute myeloid leukemias. Blood. 2005;105:3615–3622. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Salih H.R., Antropius H., Gieseke F., Lutz S.Z., Kanz L., Rammensee H.G., Steinle A. Functional expression and release of ligands for the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D in leukemia. Blood. 2003;102:1389–1396. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-01-0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Zaretsky J.M., Garcia-Diaz A., Shin D.S., Escuin-Ordinas H., Hugo W., Hu-Lieskovan S., Torrejon D.Y., Abril-Rodriguez G., Sandoval S., Barthly L., et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:819–829. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1604958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Benci J.L., Xu B., Qiu Y., Wu T.J., Dada H., Twyman-Saint Victor C., Cucolo L., Lee D.S.M., Pauken K.E., et al. Tumor interferon signaling regulates a multigenic resistance program to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell. 2016;167:1540–1554.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Gettinger S., Choi J., Hastings K., Truini A., Datar I., Sowell R., Wurtz A., Dong W., Cai G., Melnick M.A., et al. Impaired HLA Class I antigen processing and presentation as a mechanism of acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:1420–1435. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.George S., Miao D., Demetri G.D., Adeegbe D., Rodig S.J., Shukla S., Lipschitz M., Amin-Mansour A., Raut C.P., Carter S.L., et al. Loss of PTEN is associated with resistance to anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade therapy in metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. Immunity. 2017;46:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Rotolo A., Caputo V.S., Holubova M., Baxan N., Dubois O., Chaudhry M.S., Xiao X., Goudevenou K., Pitcher D.S., Petevi K., et al. Enhanced anti-lymphoma activity of CAR19-iNKT-cells underpinned by dual CD19 and CD1d Targeting. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:596–610.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Guan P., Bassiri H., Patel N.P., Nichols K.E., Das R. Invariant natural killer T-cells in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Killer choice for natural suppression. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:629–637. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hermanson D.L., Bendzick L., Pribyl L., McCullar V., Vogel R.I., Miller J.S., Geller M.A., Kaufman D.S. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived natural killer cells for treatment of ovarian cancer. Stem Cells. 2016;34:93–101. doi: 10.1002/stem.2230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Zeng J., Tang S.Y., Toh L.L., Wang S. Generation of "Off-the-Shelf" Natural Killer Cells from Peripheral Blood Cell-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2017;9:1796–1812. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]