Abstract
Background
99mTc-labelled methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) uptake can occasionally be identified in extraosseous neoplasms on whole-body scans (WBSs) and may be misinterpreted as bone metastasis. The purpose of our study was to investigate the frequency of 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms and to assess the additional value of SPECT/CT for the localization and characterization of this unusual uptake.
Methods
Data from 7308 patients (SPECT/CT was performed in 2147 patients) with known cancer who underwent WBSs for metastatic work-up between May 2015 and July 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The locations, numbers, and intensities of extraosseous 99mTc-MDP uptake were evaluated by WBS, and the intratumoural calcification was evaluated by SPECT/CT. The diagnostic accuracy of SPECT/CT in locating 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms was compared to that of WBS.
Results
A total of 41 patients showed 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms. Of these patients, 23 patients had uncertain lesions by WBS, and further SPECT/CT was performed. The incidence of 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms was observed to be 0.6% by WBS and 1.1% (by) SPECT/CT. During imaging analysis, WBS had an accuracy of only 35% (14/40), whereas SPECT/CT correctly located and diagnosed all 40 lesion sites in the 23 patients. Twenty-three lesion sites (57.5%, 23/40) showed moderate or high intensity of extraosseous 99mTc-MDP uptake. Of the 23 patients, 17 patients (73.9%, 18/23) with 31 lesion sites (77.5%, 31/40) presented with intratumoural calcification.
Conclusions
99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms can be observed as 0.6% on WBS and is usually localized to the breast, liver, and lung. Nuclear physicians should be familiar with such extraosseous uptake when interpreting WBSs. SPECT/CT offers better accuracy than WBS alone for locating the majority of lesions present with intratumoural calcification.
Keywords: Extraosseous uptake, 99mTc-MDP, SPECT/CT, Whole-body bone scan, Calcification
Background
Whole-body bone scans (WBSs) using 99mTc-labelled methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) is the most sensitive examination for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer [1, 2]. Normally, 99mTc-MDP uptake is seen in the skeletal structure and urinary system. However, a few studies have suggested that 99mTc-MDP uptake can occasionally be identified in some extraosseous neoplasms (including primary tumour [3–5] and metastatic lesions [6–8]) by WBS, which may be misinterpreted as bone metastases or skeletal involvement. To distinguish this finding from bone metastasis is important for patients with known cancer; however, this is particularly difficult if WBS is used alone because of limited anatomical resolution. SPECT/CT offers the opportunity to acquire both anatomical and functional images, hence enabling more precise anatomical localization and characterization of abnormal radiotracer uptake by SPECT using CT images, possibly reducing confusion and enhancing the diagnostic value of the study when interpreting WBS images question, thereby altering patient management. [1, 9–11].
In the last few decades, various authors have reported the potential value of SPECT/CT in the localization and characterization of 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms, including breast cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumour, Ewing sarcoma, pyelonephritis, sclerosing pneumocytoma, and other diseases [3–8, 12–15]. Generally, these case reports and pictorial essays refer to a single case or to a limited number of patients. Nevertheless, the incidence and imaging features of SPECT/CT in such extraosseous uptake have not been systematically summarized, and the exact mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, the aims of present study were first, to investigate the frequency of extraosseous uptake of 99mTc-MDP in soft-tissue neoplasms and to discuss the possible mechanism, and second, to assess the additional value of SPECT/CT in the localization and characterization of this unusual uptake compared to WBS alone.
Methods
Patients
Between May 2015 and July 2018, 99mTc-MDP WBS was performed in 7308 patients (SPECT/CT was performed in 2147 patients) at our hospital. Patients were included in our study if they met the following criteria: (1) known cancer undergoing WBS for metastatic work-up; and (2) WBS or further SPECT/CT found to have 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasm. This study was approved by the local ethics committee. Because of the retrospective nature of the study, written informed consent was waived.
Imaging acquisition
All images were acquired using a SPECT/CT scanner (Philips Healthcare, Eindhoven, the Netherlands). WBS images were acquired 2–3 h after intravenous injection of 99mTc-MDP at 15–25 mCi, using a low energy, high resolution, and parallel hole collimators. A 256 × 256 matrix with 500 K counts per view was used. After WBS acquisition, the imaging was directly interpreted by experienced nuclear medicine physician. If uncertain lesions were identified on WBS, one or more additional SPECT/CT scans were performed. A low-dose CT was performed for anatomic location and attenuation correction. CT data were acquired with exposure of 140 KeV, 2.5 mA, and 512 × 512 matrix. After CT acquisition, the SPECT acquisition protocol was started, as follows: 15% energy window at 140 keV, and 128 × 128 matrix. Processing and fusion of SPECT and CT images were performed using Jet Steam Workspace (Philips Healthcare, Eindhoven, Netherlands).
Imaging analysis
All images were reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians with interpretation in consensus. In the first step, reviewers evaluated the WBS images while unaware of the SPECT/CT images, according to following imaging features: location, number, and intensity of extraosseous 99mTc-MDP uptake. When interpretating WBS images, abnormal radiotracer uptake lesions were classified as two categories (extraosseous and intraosseous). The criteria for classifying a region of 99mTc-MDP uptake as extraosseous were: the lesion was clearly outside the skeleton structure (such as in chest wall and abdominal region), and the region could not be accounted for by physiological or other distribution. The criterion for classifying a region of 99mTc-MDP uptake as intraosseous was: the lesion overlapped with the skeletal structure. The intensity of 99mTc-MDP uptake was graded as high (the 99mTc-MDP uptake was higher than the sternum on the WBS images), moderate (equal to sternum), or low (less than the sternum). In the second step, SPECT/CT images were evaluated according to the following imaging features: location, number, and presence or absence of intratumoural calcification. For the definition of a disease site, we used the following criteria: (1) each involved liver segment, (2) each lymph node region, (3) each lung lobe and (4) every soft tissue neoplasm.
Statistical analysis
Continuous data were described as the means±standard deviations (SD). Categorical data were described as numbers and frequency (%). The diagnostic accuracy of SPECT/CT for locating 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasm were calculated and compared to WBS using the chi-square test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical data were performed using the SPSS Statistics 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software.
Results
Patients
A total of 41 patients showed 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms. Of these patients, 23 patients had uncertain lesions on WBS, and one or more additional SPECT/CT scans were performed. Patient characteristics are detailed in Table 1. The remaining 18 patients with breast cancer showed 99mTc-MDP uptake in the anterior chest wall by WBS, suggesting extraosseous uptake in breast cancer, and further SPECT/CT was not performed. The incidence of 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms was 0.6% (41/7308) by WBS and 1.1% (23/2147) by SPECT/CT.
Table 1.
Characteristics | Value | Percentage (range) |
---|---|---|
Age (years) | 57.4 ± 12.1 | 33–78 |
Sex | ||
Male | 12 | 52.2% |
Female | 11 | 47.8% |
History of malignancy | ||
Breast cancer | 7 | 30.4% |
Lung cancer | 4 | 17.4% |
Colorectal cancer | 3 | 13.0% |
Ovarian tumor | 2 | 8.7% |
Osteosarcoma | 2 | 8.7% |
Gastric stromal tumor | 1 | 4.3% |
Endometrial cancer | 1 | 4.3% |
Thyroid cancer | 1 | 4.3% |
Malignant teratoma | 1 | 4.3% |
Hepatocellular cancinoma | 1 | 4.3% |
Primary treatment | ||
No treatment | 16 | 69.6% |
Surgery + chemotherapy +RT | 3 | 13.0% |
Surgery + chemotherapy | 4 | 17.4% |
RT radiotherapy
In total, SPECT/CT detected 40 sites of extraosseous 99mTc-MDP uptake in the 23 patients (Table 2). 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms were most frequently found in liver (Fig. 1), accounting for 30% (12/40) of lesions, followed by breast (Fig. 2), lung (Figs. 3 and 4), pleura, lymph node (Figs. 3 and 5), peritoneum (Fig. 4), subcutaneous soft tissues (Fig. 4), ovary, brain (Fig. 6), chest wall, thyroid, mediastinum, and uterus.
Table 2.
Lesion sites | Primary | Metastasis | Total | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liver | 1 | 11 | 12 | 30% |
Breast | 6 | 0 | 6 | 15% |
Lung | 2 | 2 | 5 | 12.5% |
Pleura | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7.5% |
Lymph node | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7.5% |
Peritoneum | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5% |
Subcutaneous soft tissues | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5% |
Ovary | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5% |
Chest wall | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.5% |
Brain | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.5% |
Uterus | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2.5% |
thyroid | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2.5% |
Mediastinum | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2.5% |
Total | 14 | 26 | 40 | 100% |
WBS and SPECT/CT findings
A summary of the clinical characteristics, WBS and SPECT/CT findings of all 23 patients is displayed in Table 3. On the WBS images, the intensity of extraosseous 99mTc-MDP uptake was considered high in 17 lesion sites, moderate in 6 sites and low in 17 sites. Fourteen lesion sites showing abnormal areas of 99mTc-MDP uptake outside the skeleton structure were interpreted as having extraosseous uptake. Twenty-three sites of lesion overlapping with the skeleton structure were misinterpreted as having bone lesions. Three sites of lesion were missed by WBS because of extraosseous 99mTc-MDP uptake equal to or lower than that of adjacent bone. Overall, when considering extraosseous uptake lesions as positive, WBS had an accuracy of only 35% (14/40) based on the standard criteria.
Table 3.
Pat. | Clinical diagnosis | Primary treatment | WBS | SPECT/CT finding | Final diagnosis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Localization | Intensity (n) | Localization | CA | ||||
1 | Gastric stromal tumor | NA | L. 7th posterior rib | H (1) | L. Lung | + | Lung cancer (adenocarcinoma) |
2 | Lung cancer | NA | R. Anterior chest wall | L (1) | R. Lung | + | Lung cancer (adenocarcinoma) |
3 | Lung cancer | Surgery + chemotherapy +RT | R. occipital bone | H (1) | R. Brain | + | Brain metastasis |
4 | Breast cancer | NA | R. Anterior chest wall | M (1) | R. Breast | + | Breast cancer |
5 | Breast cancer | NA | R. 3th posterior rib | M (1) | R. Breast | _ | Breast cancer |
6 | Breast cancer | NA | R. 5-6th posterior rib | H (1) | R. Breast | + | Breast cancer |
7 | Breast cancer | NA | R. Anterior chest wall | L (1) | R breast | + | Breast cancer |
8 | Breast cancer | Surgery + chemotherapy +RT | R.6th posterior rib | H (1) | R. anterior chest wall | _ | Recurrent breast cancer |
9 | Breast cancer | NA | L. Anterior chest wall | L (1) | L breast | _ | Breast cancer |
10 | Breast cancer | NA | R. Anterior chest wall | H (1) | R breast | + | Breast cancer |
11 | Rectal cancer | Surgery + chemotherapy | R. 4-5th posterior rib | M (1) | R. Lung | + | Lung metastasis |
12 | Colorectal cancer | Surgery + chemotherapy | R. Upper abdomen | L (4) | Liver | + | Liver metastasis |
13 | Rectal cancer | Surgery + chemotherapy | R. Upper abdomen | L (4) | Liver | + | Liver metastasis |
14 | Ovarian cancer | Surgery + chemotherapy | L. Pubic bone | H (1) | Lymph node | + | Lymph node metastasis |
15 | Ovarian cancer | NA | Abdominopelvic cavity | H (1) | Peritoneum | + | Peritoneal metastasis |
16 | Breast cancer | NA | L. Pelvic cavity | H (1) | Ovary | + | Ovarian thecoma |
17 | Osteosarcoma | NA |
L. Supraclavicular region Multiple rib L. Upper abdomen Third lumbar vertebra |
H (4) M (2) L (2) |
L. Supraclavicular Lymph node R. Lung L. Upper peritoneum Subcutaneous soft tissues |
+ | Multiple metastasis |
18 | Osteosarcoma | NA | Multiple rib | H (2) | Mediastinal lymph node | + | Lymph node metastasis |
19 | Primary liver malignancy | NA | R. Upper abdomen | H (1) | Liver | + | HCC |
20 | Thyroid cancer | NA | Lower cervical vertebra | M (1) | Right thyroid | – | Medullary thyroid cancer |
21 | Uterine malignancy | NA | R. Sacroiliac joint | H (1) | Uterus | – | Endometrial cancer |
22 | Mediastinum tumor | NA | R. Anterior chest wall | H (1) | Mediastinum | + | Malignant teratoma |
23 | Lung cancer | Surgery + chemotherapy +RT | R. Upper abdomen | L (3) | Liver | _ | Liver metastasis |
RT radiotherapy, L left, R right, H high, M moderate, L low, CA calcification, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma
With the addition of SPECT/CT, all 40 sites of lesions in 23 patients were correctly located and diagnosed. The accuracy of SPECT/CT in detecting lesions was 100%, significantly higher than that of WBS (χ2 = 38.52, P<0.01). Of the 23 patients, 17 patients (73.9%, 18/23) with 31 lesion sites (77.5%, 31/40) presented with intratumoural calcification. Six patients had an absence of intratumoural calcification. Three of these patients had breast cancer, and one patient each had medullary thyroid cancer, endometrial cancer and liver metastatic disease from lung cancer.
Discussion
99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms is occasionally encountered by WBS in clinical practice. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has measured the incidence of such unusual uptake by WBS and SPECT/CT. In our series, 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasm was observed in 0.6% by WBS and 1.1% by SPECT/CT, usually localized in the breast, liver, and lung.
Radiological familiarity with 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms is crucial to differentiate form osseous metastasis and prevent unnecessary treatment. However, the diagnosis of such extraosseous uptake can be a challenge if WBS is used alone, since extraosseous uptake frequently overlaps with skeletal structures, often mimicking osseous metastasis. Of the cases examined in our study, WBS had an accuracy of only 35% (14/40) based on the standard criteria. In our study [9, 10] and those of others [2, 16], SPECT/CT effectively resolved diagnostic uncertainty. In the present study, SPECT/CT correctly located and diagnosed all 40 sites (100%) of lesions in 23 patients. Early detection or exclusion of osseous metastasis has a profound influence on the management of patients with known malignancy. Therefore, the use of SPECT/CT is likely to result in altering patient management.
Nevertheless, the exact mechanism of 99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms is difficult to identify with precision, and various factors have been proposed. In some studies, histological evidence of calcium deposition has been proposed to be the most important factor [4, 6, 7, 12, 14, 15]. In our series, intratumoural calcification was noted in 31 lesion sites (77.5%, 31/40). We performed SPECT/CT in two patients with osteosarcoma in which the fused functional and anatomic images allowed increased sensitivity for the detection of lymph nodes, pleura, lung, subcutaneous and peritoneal metastasis due to metastatic lesions with calcification. Similar findings were reported by Mebarki M and colleagues [12] for the investigation of osteosarcoma. Classically, primary osteosarcoma and its metastases show extraosseous uptake due to bone matrix formation. Adenocarcinoma (both primary and metastatic) may calcify and accumulate 99mTc-MDP, including carcinomas of the breast and lung, as well as colorectal cancer and ovarian cancer [14, 15, 17]. Among the primary malignancies in our series, breast cancer (n = 24) most frequently showed extraosseous uptake of 99mTc-MDP. In our series, increased 99mTc-MDP uptake was also described in a wide variety of primary neoplasms, including ovarian thecoma, malignant teratoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Extraosseous uptake in metastatic lesions were most frequently found in the liver, accounting for 42.3% (11/26) of lesions. The exact mechanism of extraosseous uptake of 99mTc-MDP in breast, lung, and colorectal cancer is that adenocarcinoma and its metastases possess a mucinous component that may calcify because of internal tumour glycoprotein that binds calcium [14, 15, 17]. In addition, studies reported that calcification in colorectal liver metastasis is generally considered a good indicator of the response to treatment [18]. Therefore, WBS and SPECT/CT may be a potentially useful imaging modality to evaluate responses to treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastasis. Six patients had an absence of intratumoural calcification. Three of these patients had breast cancer, and one patient each had medullary thyroid cancer, endometrial cancer and liver metastatic disease from lung cancer. The mechanism of 99mTc-MDP uptake in these patients may be increased tumour vascularity or hair-like calcification that is invisible on CT [14, 15].
This study has some limitations. First, the study was limited by its retrospective design, and the sample size was not large. Second, the actual rates of extraosseous uptake may have been underestimated because some lesions may be missed by WBS due to extraosseous 99mTc-MDP uptake equal to or lower than that of adjacent bone; therefore, further SPECT/CT was not performed. Third, some lesions were not confirmed by histology, and the exact mechanism of extraosseous uptake may remain unknown in these patients.
Conclusion
99mTc-MDP uptake in extraosseous neoplasms can be observed as 0.6% on WBS and is usually localized to the breast, liver, and lung. Nuclear physicians should be familiar with such extraosseous uptake when interpreting WBSs. SPECT/CT offers better accuracy than WBS alone for locating the majority of lesions present with intratumoural calcification.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Wen Li and Dr. Xiaoyan Wang for their help with the interpretation of the SPECT/CT images.
Abbreviations
- 99mTc-MDP
99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate
- SPECT/CT
Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography
- WBS
Whole-body bone scans
Authors’ contributions
LQZ and QH participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript, TZ collected the patients’ data. BZ and WL interpreted the WBS and SPECT/CT images, HP and XZ helped draft the manuscript, and LWM processed the figures. RSZ conceived the study and supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (No. A2019528) and Guangzhou key medical discipline construction project fund. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.
Data and materials during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The current study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital&Institute of Guangzhou Medical University (No.2017003), and the need for signed informed consent was waived.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Linqi Zhang and Qiao He contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Linqi Zhang, Email: zhanglinqi0909@163.com.
Qiao He, Email: heqiao0925@126.com.
Tao Zhou, Email: 2449662513@qq.com.
Bing Zhang, Email: lihecihange@163.com.
Wei Li, Email: liwei9741@126.com.
Hao Peng, Email: 1194171163@qq.com.
Xi Zhong, Email: zhongxi871211@163.com.
Liwu Ma, Email: 15603060824@163.com.
Rusen Zhang, Phone: 86-020-66673666-2046, Email: zhangrusen2015@163.com.
References
- 1.Helyar V, Mohan HK, Barwick T, Livieratos L, Gnanasegaran G, Clarke SE, Fogelman I. The added value of multislice SPECT/CT in patients with equivocal bony metastasis from carcinoma of the prostate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(4):706–713. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1334-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Palmedo H, Marx C, Ebert A, Kreft B, Ko Y, Turler A, Vorreuther R, Gohring U, Schild HH, Gerhardt T, et al. Whole-body SPECT/CT for bone scintigraphy: diagnostic value and effect on patient management in oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(1):59–67. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2532-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shepherd TM, Idakoji IA, Pampaloni MH. Incidental detection of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by Tc-99m MDP bone scan. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37(2):198–199. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31823e9f95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang G, Wang X, Wang Z, Jiang Y, Fu J. Tc-99m MDP uptake in a giant pulmonary chondroma. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36(11):1029–1030. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318219b3ad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gu T, Shi H, Xiu Y, Gu Y. Primary pulmonary osteosarcoma: PET/CT and SPECT/CT findings. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36(12):e209–e212. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182291ec3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kawase T, Fujii H, Nakahara T, Shigematsu N, Kubo A, Kosuda S. Intense accumulation of Tc-99m MDP in pericardial metastasis from breast cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34(3):173–174. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31819672b9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ali I, Johns W, Gupta SM. Visualization of hepatic metastases of medullary thyroid carcinoma on Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2006;31(10):611–613. doi: 10.1097/01.rlu.0000238256.19694.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takahashi T, Machida K, Honda N, Hosono M, Oku S, Osada H, Murata O, Nishimura K, Ohno H. Extraosseous accumulation of 99mTc-MDP in lymph node metastases of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18(2):157–160. doi: 10.1007/BF02985107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang L, He Q, Jiang M, Zhang B, Zhong X, Zhang R. Diagnosis of insufficiency fracture after radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer: contribution of technetium Tc 99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(7):1369–1376. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang L, He Q, Li W, Zhang R. The value of (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia. BMC Med Imaging. 2017;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0218-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ciappuccini R, Blanchard D, Rame JP, de Raucourt D, Babin E, Bardet S. Radioiodine sinus uptake related to mucosal thickening or aspergilloma: a case series of an unrecognized event well evidenced by SPECT/CT. Cancer Imaging. 2017;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40644-016-0105-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mebarki M, Medjahedi A, Menemani A, Betterki S, Terki S, Berber N. Osteosarcoma pulmonary metastasis mimicking abnormal skeletal uptake in bone scan: utility of SPECT/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38(10):e392–e394. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318266cdcb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.James B, Chandler NC, Quarless SA. Extraosseous uptake of Tc-99m MDP along the radiation therapy port for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Clin Nucl Med. 2005;30(8):555–557. doi: 10.1097/01.rlu.0000170042.33387.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Soundararajan R, Naswa N, Sharma P, Karunanithi S, Nazar AH, Das KJ, Bal C, Malhotra A, Kumar R. SPECT-CT for characterization of extraosseous uptake of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate on bone scintigraphy. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19(5):405–410. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wale DJ, Wong KK, Savas H, Kandathil A, Piert M, Brown RK. Extraosseous findings on bone scintigraphy using fusion SPECT/CT and correlative imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(1):160–172. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Utsunomiya D, Shiraishi S, Imuta M, Tomiguchi S, Kawanaka K, Morishita S, Awai K, Yamashita Y. Added value of SPECT/CT fusion in assessing suspected bone metastasis: comparison with scintigraphy alone and nonfused scintigraphy and CT. Radiology. 2006;238(1):264–271. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373041358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yu MH, Kim YJ, Park HS, Jung SI, Jeon HJ. Imaging patterns of Intratumoral calcification in the abdominopelvic cavity. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(2):323–335. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.2.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Easson AM, Barron PT, Cripps C, Hill G, Guindi M, Michaud C. Calcification in colorectal hepatic metastases correlates with longer survival. J Surg Oncol. 1996;63(4):221–225. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199612)63:4<221::AID-JSO2>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.
Data and materials during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.