Skip to main content
Plant Biotechnology logoLink to Plant Biotechnology
letter
. 2017 Jun 22;34(2):107–113. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.17.0326a

Phosphorylation of rice sucrose synthase isoforms promotes the activity of sucrose degradation

Haruka Takeda 1, Muneyuki Niikura 1, Azusa Narumi 1, Hiromi Aoki 1, Tadamasa Sasaki 1,a, Hiroaki Shimada 1,*
PMCID: PMC6543756  PMID: 31275015

Abstract

Sucrose is utilized as an initial material for production of the storage substances. Sucrose synthase reversibly catalyzes reactions of the sucrose degradation and its synthesis between sucrose with UDP and UDP-glucose with fructose. They also had the activity of the reactions for sucrose degradation of sucrose with ADP, and sucrose synthesis from ADP-glucose and fructose. Rice has three representative isoforms of sucrose synthase, Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3, in which Rsus1 and Rsus3 are highly expressed in developing seeds. These three isoforms were phosphorylated by SPK, a calcium-dependent protein kinase. By phosphorylation, they showed increase of their reactivity for sucrose degradation on both reactions using UDP and ADP. In contrast, the synthetic activity of these isoforms was not altered by phosphorylation in any cases of the reactions with UDP-glucose and ADP-glucose. These results indicated that phosphorylation of sucrose synthase isoforms selectively led to enhance the reactivity for sucrose degradation.

Keywords: phosphorylation, protein kinase, rice, sucrose synthesis and degradation


Sucrose synthase reversibly catalyzes the sucrose degradation and its biosynthesis. UDP-glucose, the main product of the sucrose degradation, is important as the starting material for the biosynthesis of cellulose and storage starch (Amor et al. 1995). Sucrose synthase genes compose a small multigene family in plant genomes, such in those of pea, potato, maize and Arabidopsis (Barratt et al. 2001; Baud et al., 2004; Chourey et al. 1998; Weckwerth et al. 2004; Zrenner et al. 1995). In Arabidopsis, more than one isoform or pair of isoforms must be able to provide UDP-glucose to cellulose synthase, and it is likely that more than one isoform can provide substrates for energy production for phloem loading and carbon for lipid synthesis in developing embryos (Bieniawska et al. 2007).

In the rice genome, six genes for the isozymes of sucrose synthase, Rsus1 to OsSus6, have been reported (Hirose et al. 2008; Su 1995). Among them, Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 are classified to SUS–I clade, and these isoforms are highly conserved with structural similarity (Supplementary Figure 1). In the developing seeds, Rsus1 and Rsus3 are specifically expressed in endosperm, whereas Rsus2 is broadly expressed in immature seeds, suggesting that Rsus1 and Rsus3 is highly involved in storage starch biosynthesis, and Rsus2 functions as the sucrose transport into endosperm from source organ (Wang et al. 1999).

Rice endosperm accumulates a massive amount of storage starch, which is synthesized from ADP-glucose by the synthetic reaction of starch synthase in amyloplast. The ability of ADP-glucose supply is considered to determine the strength of storage starch production. The main pathway supplying ADP-glucose is shown to be a reaction from glucose-1-phosphate and ATP to ADP-glucose by ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (Bahaji et al. 2016). Although UDP is generally considered to be the preferred nucleoside diphosphate for sucrose synthase, ADP also serves as an effective substrate to produce ADP-glucose, which may facilitate the production of storage starch by the enzymes such as starch synthase (Bahaji et al. 2016; Su 1995).

Sucrose synthase is phosphorylated by a calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK), and is controlled its enzymatic activity for sucrose degradation (Huber et al. 1996). Phosphorylation of maize Sus2 could be involved in its ability to associate with membranes (Duncan et al. 2006). We have found a CDPK, termed SPK, which is specifically expressed in developing seeds, may phosphorylate rice Rsus2 (formerly called as Susy1). We have also shown that lacking the SPK activity results in deficient storage starch accumulation in developing seeds, suggesting that SPK is tightly involved in the reaction of sucrose synthase in endosperm (Asano et al. 2002). However, it is unclear what effect occurs on the enzyme activity by phosphorylation. In this study, we focused on the SUS–I clade sucrose synthase isoforms, Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3, and determined their characters in detail. We analyzed the reaction kinetics of the isoforms of rice sucrose synthase for the reaction of sucrose synthesis and sucrose degradation using UDP or ADP. Here, we report the effect of phosphorylation on the enzyme activities.

The full-length cDNAs corresponding to the genes for sucrose synthase isoforms, Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 (AK100546, AK100334, and AK100006, respectively), were obtained from the Rice Genome Resource Center of the National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Japan. Each of proteins of sucrose synthase isoforms was prepared as a fusion protein with glutathione-S-transferase (GST) using an E. coli expression system. The portion of the GST tag in the fusion proteins were removed using Factor Xa Cleavage Capture Kit (Novagen Madison, WI, USA). SPK (D13436) was used as the protein kinase of sucrose synthase. The kinase reaction was carried out as described previously (Asano et al. 2002).

We have determined that a protein kinase SPK may phosphorylate the lysine residue of the Rsus2, which was located at the conservative phosphorylation site (Asano et al. 2002). To identify whether similar modification may occur on the other isoforms, Rsus1 and Rsus3 (formerly called as Susy2 and Susy3, respectively) were prepared as the GST-fusion proteins, and examined their phosphorylation by SPK. Similarly to Rsus2, phosphorylation of the GST-fusion proteins of Rsus1 and Rsus3 was detected (Figure 1), whereas we detected self-phosphorylation of GST-SPK and no phosphorylation of GST. These results suggested that these isoforms of sucrose synthase were phosphorylated by SPK.

Figure 1. In vitro phosphorylation of GST–Sucrose synthase isoforms (Rsus) in the presence or absence of GST–SPK (SPK). (A) Proteins on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel were detected by Coomassie blue–stain. A GST-sucrose synthase fusion protein was purified using a Glutathione Sepharose 4B column (GE Healthcare, Japan) as described previously (Asano et al. 2002). (B) Detection of as phosphorylated sucrose synthase isoforms. SPK (D13436) was used as the protein kinase of sucrose synthase (Asano et al. 2002). After 20-min incubation with each isoform of sucrose synthase and GST-fusion SPK at 30°C, the ATP remaining in the reaction mixture was removed by means of a Sephadex G-50 spin column (GE Healthcare). Phosphorylated proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie blue, and detected using Pro-Q Diamond staining (Promega WI, USA). Lanes for Control, Rsus2, Rsus1, Rsus3, and GST indicate the results of the reactions with GST-fused SPK, Rsus2 with/without GST-fused SPK, Rsus1 with/without GST-fused SPK, Rsus3 with/without GST-fused SPK, and GST, respectively. The presence and absence of SPK in the reactions is indicated below by (+) and (−). Arrows indicate the position of the corresponding proteins on the gel. (C) and (D) GST–Sucrose synthase isoforms (lanes 2–4 in the left panel of (C)), GST–removed sucrose synthase isoforms (lanes 2–4 in the right panel of (C)), GST–SPK (lane 4 of (D)), and GST–removed SPK (lane 7 of (D)) on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel were detected by Coomassie blue stain. The portion of the GST tag in the fusion proteins were removed using Factor Xa Cleavage Capture Kit.

Figure 1. In vitro phosphorylation of GST–Sucrose synthase isoforms (Rsus) in the presence or absence of GST–SPK (SPK). (A) Proteins on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel were detected by Coomassie blue–stain. A GST-sucrose synthase fusion protein was purified using a Glutathione Sepharose 4B column (GE Healthcare, Japan) as described previously (Asano et al. 2002). (B) Detection of as phosphorylated sucrose synthase isoforms. SPK (D13436) was used as the protein kinase of sucrose synthase (Asano et al. 2002). After 20-min incubation with each isoform of sucrose synthase and GST-fusion SPK at 30°C, the ATP remaining in the reaction mixture was removed by means of a Sephadex G-50 spin column (GE Healthcare). Phosphorylated proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie blue, and detected using Pro-Q Diamond staining (Promega WI, USA). Lanes for Control, Rsus2, Rsus1, Rsus3, and GST indicate the results of the reactions with GST-fused SPK, Rsus2 with/without GST-fused SPK, Rsus1 with/without GST-fused SPK, Rsus3 with/without GST-fused SPK, and GST, respectively. The presence and absence of SPK in the reactions is indicated below by (+) and (−). Arrows indicate the position of the corresponding proteins on the gel. (C) and (D) GST–Sucrose synthase isoforms (lanes 2–4 in the left panel of (C)), GST–removed sucrose synthase isoforms (lanes 2–4 in the right panel of (C)), GST–SPK (lane 4 of (D)), and GST–removed SPK (lane 7 of (D)) on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel were detected by Coomassie blue stain. The portion of the GST tag in the fusion proteins were removed using Factor Xa Cleavage Capture Kit.

We analyzed the activity of each enzyme by measurement of the amount of fructose that was generated as a product of the sucrose degradation. When the reaction was performed using each isoform of the sucrose synthase with UDP, the reaction condition was settled in a reaction cocktail containing a fixed amount of enzyme solution (5 µg protein), UDP (5 mM), and a series of different amount of sucrose (0 to 1000 mM). In this condition, Rsus2 showed good reactivity. Production of fructose rapidly leached to a certain constant value in maximum that was 600 mM sucrose (Figure 2B). Rsus1 and Rsus3 showed similar patterns of the enzyme reactivity, and amounts of the generated fructose linearly increased depending on the amount of sucrose (Figure 2A, C). Lineweaver–Burk plots, by which kinetic parameters were evaluated, indicated a linear correlation between values of 1/v and 1/[sucrose content] in the reaction mixture (Supplementary Figure 2).

Figure 2. Reactions of the isoforms of rice sucrose synthase for the sucrose degradation using UDP or ADP. (A)–(C). The activities of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 were measured in the direction of sucrose degradation using UDP as a substrate. Each of Rsus1, Rsus2 and Rsus3 solutions corresponding to 5 µg protein was used as the enzyme in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). For the reaction with the phosphorylated sucrose synthase, 5 µg of sucrose synthase was combined with 5 µg of GST-SPK solution in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and incubated at 30°C for 10 min. The cleavage reactions of sucrose were performed at 30°C for 15 min in 400 µl of the reaction mixture containing the enzyme solution supplemented to 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM ATP, 25 µM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM UDP and an appropriate amount of sucrose (0–1000 mM). The reaction terminated by heating at 95°C. (D)–(F). The activities of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 were measured in the direction of sucrose degradation using ADP as a substrate. The reaction was performed by the reaction condition with the fixed amount of enzyme solution (5 µg protein), ADP (5 mM), and an appropriate amount of sucrose (0–1500 mM). Solid lines and broken lines indicate the results of reactions using the enzyme with phosphorylated (+SPK) or without phosphorylation (–SPK), respectively. Generated fructose by the cleavage reaction was measured using F-kit (J-K International, Tokyo, Japan), by which coupled assays containing Hexokinase, Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and phosphoglucose isomerase was performed, and increase of NADP was monitored at 340 nm. Error bars represent standard deviations of these measurements. n=3.

Figure 2. Reactions of the isoforms of rice sucrose synthase for the sucrose degradation using UDP or ADP. (A)–(C). The activities of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 were measured in the direction of sucrose degradation using UDP as a substrate. Each of Rsus1, Rsus2 and Rsus3 solutions corresponding to 5 µg protein was used as the enzyme in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). For the reaction with the phosphorylated sucrose synthase, 5 µg of sucrose synthase was combined with 5 µg of GST-SPK solution in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and incubated at 30°C for 10 min. The cleavage reactions of sucrose were performed at 30°C for 15 min in 400 µl of the reaction mixture containing the enzyme solution supplemented to 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM ATP, 25 µM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM UDP and an appropriate amount of sucrose (0–1000 mM). The reaction terminated by heating at 95°C. (D)–(F). The activities of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 were measured in the direction of sucrose degradation using ADP as a substrate. The reaction was performed by the reaction condition with the fixed amount of enzyme solution (5 µg protein), ADP (5 mM), and an appropriate amount of sucrose (0–1500 mM). Solid lines and broken lines indicate the results of reactions using the enzyme with phosphorylated (+SPK) or without phosphorylation (–SPK), respectively. Generated fructose by the cleavage reaction was measured using F-kit (J-K International, Tokyo, Japan), by which coupled assays containing Hexokinase, Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and phosphoglucose isomerase was performed, and increase of NADP was monitored at 340 nm. Error bars represent standard deviations of these measurements. n=3.

Phosphorylation of the isoforms showed larger amount of fructose production with similar patterns of enzymatic kinetics of the corresponding isoforms without phosphorylation. Among three isoforms, the reactivity of Rsus2 significantly increased by phosphorylation. The other isoforms also showed higher reactivity by phosphorylation, but ratio of increase was relatively small as compared with that of Rsus2 (Figure 2A–C). The Km values to the amount of sucrose were lowered by phosphorylation of isoforms of sucrose synthase, and shown as smaller values than those without phosphorylation on Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3, respectively (Table 1). The values of the catalytic efficiency significantly increased on their phosphorylated isoforms (Table 1). These results showed that phosphorylation of all isoforms of sucrose synthase led to increase the affinity to the substrates as well as their reactivity, suggesting that the reaction of sucrose degradation using UDP was greatly promoted by phosphorylation.

Table 1. Enzymatic kinetics for the sucrose degradation by the isoforms of rice sucrose synthase.

Sucrose+UDP
Isoform Phosphor-ylation Km (mM) Vmax (nmol min−1 (µg protein)−1) kcat (min−1) catalytic efficiency (min−1 mM−1)
Rsus1 219±50.6 3.23±0.25 295±33.7 1.33±0.15
+ 160±49.0 3.37±0.21 308±14.7 1.80±0.26
Rsus2 82.7±26.5 2.73±0.06 255±5.13 3.80±1.32
+ 74.7±8.62 3.83±0.47 355±44.5 4.77±0.67
Rsus3 525±54.2 1.63±0.06 149±8.39 0.29±0.01
+ 384±93.0 1.67±0.20 151±18.0 0.41±0.06
Sucrose+ADP
Isoform Phosphor-ylation Km (mM) Vmax (nmol min−1 (µg protein)−1) kcat (min−1) catalytic efficiency (min−1 mM−1)
Rsus1 1799±358 1.47±0.15 129±14.2 0.08±0.01
+ 1571±92.1 1.93±0.21 170±21.1 0.12±0.03
Rsus2 896±165 1.77±0.38 163±40.9 0.19±0.09
+ 781±94.8 2.03±0.51 185±47.6 0.24±0.09
Rsus3 2085±89.6 1.40±0.17 128±19.2 0.06±0.01
+ 1467±92.6 1.55±0.35 131±31.8 0.10±0.02

Kinetic parameters, Km and Vmax, were evaluated by Lineweaver–Burk plots (Supplementary Figure 2), which were determined on the reactions for sucrose degradation (see Figure 2). Values were determined on the correlation between amounts of fructose generated and sucrose with UDP or ADP as substrates. kcat was estimated as Vmax/enzyme content. Catalytic efficiency was evaluated as the value of kcat/Km. Each value±SD is shown (n=5).

Sucrose synthase also has an activity for degradation of sucrose with ADP to ADP-glucose and fructose (Bahaji et al. 2016). We analyzed the kinetics on the reaction of sucrose degradation with ADP as a substrate by each of isoforms with/without phosphorylation. In this case, the reaction condition was settled in a reaction cocktail containing a fixed amount of enzyme solution (5 µg protein), ADP (5 mM), and a series of different amount of sucrose (0 to 1500 mM). When they were determined by the similar reaction condition as those with UDP-glucose and fructose, smaller values of reactivity were observed on all isoforms as compared with those with UDP. Likely to those of the sucrose degradation reactions with UDP, Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 showed similar patterns of the reactivity with/without phosphorylation. Amounts of the generated fructose linearly increased depending on the amount of sucrose in the reaction cocktails (Figure 2D–F). Lineweaver–Burk plots showed a linear correlation between values of 1/v and 1/[sucrose content] in the reaction mixture (Supplementary Figure 2).

By phosphorylation of the isoforms of sucrose synthase, Km values to the amount of sucrose was greatly smaller than those of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3, respectively (Table 1), and the catalytic efficiency showed larger values than those of isoforms without phosphorylation (Table 1). These results indicated that their activities on the sucrose degradation with ADP were also enhanced by phosphorylation on all of isoforms.

Next, we analyzed the reaction of sucrose synthesis by each of sucrose synthase isoforms without phosphorylation. We evaluated the reactivity by the similar reaction condition used on the sucrose degradation. When a reaction was performed in the reaction cocktail composed of a fixed amount of enzyme (5 µg protein), fructose (10 mM), and a series of different amount of UDP-glucose (5 to 20 mM), no clear correlation was detected between reactivity and the UDP generation. When we analyzed the enzyme activity in the reaction mixture containing smaller amount of UDP-glucose ranging between 0.125 to 1.0 mM, Rsus1 and Rsus2 showed a linear correlation between the amount of generated UDP and the reaction time (Figure 3A, B). However, Rsus3 did not give a clear correlation between them because the amount of produced UDP even by this reaction condition. For the reaction of Rsus3, when amount of enzyme was changed to 10 µg (protein) in the reaction mixture, a linearity of the dose-dependent increase of UDP generation was observed (Figure 3C). The amounts of the generated UDP by Rsus1 and Rsus3 were smaller than those by Rsus2 (Figure 3A–C). Lineweaver-Burk Plot analysis showed a linear correlation between values of 1/v and 1/[UDP-glucose content] in the reaction mixture (Supplementary Figure 3).

Figure 3. Reactions of the isoforms of rice sucrose synthase for the sucrose synthesis using UDP-glucose or ADP-glucose. (A)–(C). The activities of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 were measured in the direction of sucrose synthesis using UDP-glucose and fructose as substrates. Each of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 solutions corresponding to 5 µg protein was used as the enzyme in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). For the reaction with the phosphorylated sucrose synthase, 5 µg of sucrose synthase was combined with 5 µg of GST-SPK solution in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and incubated at 30°C for 10 min. The synthetic reaction were performed at 30°C in 400 µl of the reaction mixture containing the enzyme solution supplemented to 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM ATP, 25 µM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM fructose, and appropriate amount of UDP-glucose (0–5.0 mM). For the enzyme solutions, each of sucrose synthase with/without phosphorylation was used. The synthetic reaction terminated by heating at 95°C. Generated UDP was analyzed by the coupled assays using pyruvate kinase and NADH. 80 µl of reaction mixture was combined with 10 µl of 30 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 10 µl of 6 mM NADP, 180 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 5 µl of 50 U/ml pyruvate kinase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Then 10 µl of 40 U/ml lactate dehydrogenase (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the mixture and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The amount of UDP was determined by measurement of decrease of NADP monitored at 340 nm. (D)–(F). The activities of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 were measured in the direction of sucrose synthesis using ADP-glucose and fructose as substrates. The reaction was performed by the reaction condition with the fixed amount of enzyme solution (5 µg protein for Rsus1 and Rsus2, and 10 µg protein for Rsus3), fructose (10 mM), and an appropriate amount of ADP-glucose (0–10 mM). The amount of generated ADP was measured using ADP-colorimetric/Fluorometric Assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich). Solid lines and broken lines indicate the results of reactions using the enzyme with phosphorylated (+SPK) or without phosphorylation (−SPK), respectively. Error bars represent standard deviations of these measurements. n=3.

Figure 3. Reactions of the isoforms of rice sucrose synthase for the sucrose synthesis using UDP-glucose or ADP-glucose. (A)–(C). The activities of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 were measured in the direction of sucrose synthesis using UDP-glucose and fructose as substrates. Each of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 solutions corresponding to 5 µg protein was used as the enzyme in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). For the reaction with the phosphorylated sucrose synthase, 5 µg of sucrose synthase was combined with 5 µg of GST-SPK solution in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and incubated at 30°C for 10 min. The synthetic reaction were performed at 30°C in 400 µl of the reaction mixture containing the enzyme solution supplemented to 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM ATP, 25 µM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM fructose, and appropriate amount of UDP-glucose (0–5.0 mM). For the enzyme solutions, each of sucrose synthase with/without phosphorylation was used. The synthetic reaction terminated by heating at 95°C. Generated UDP was analyzed by the coupled assays using pyruvate kinase and NADH. 80 µl of reaction mixture was combined with 10 µl of 30 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 10 µl of 6 mM NADP, 180 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 5 µl of 50 U/ml pyruvate kinase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Then 10 µl of 40 U/ml lactate dehydrogenase (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the mixture and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The amount of UDP was determined by measurement of decrease of NADP monitored at 340 nm. (D)–(F). The activities of Rsus1, Rsus2, and Rsus3 were measured in the direction of sucrose synthesis using ADP-glucose and fructose as substrates. The reaction was performed by the reaction condition with the fixed amount of enzyme solution (5 µg protein for Rsus1 and Rsus2, and 10 µg protein for Rsus3), fructose (10 mM), and an appropriate amount of ADP-glucose (0–10 mM). The amount of generated ADP was measured using ADP-colorimetric/Fluorometric Assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich). Solid lines and broken lines indicate the results of reactions using the enzyme with phosphorylated (+SPK) or without phosphorylation (−SPK), respectively. Error bars represent standard deviations of these measurements. n=3.

We analyzed the effect of phosphorylation on the synthetic reactions of these isoforms. The reactivity of Rsus2 increased by their phosphorylation, but the ratio of enhancement was relatively small compared with those on the reaction of sucrose degradation (Figure 3B). No significant difference was detected on the reactions by phosphorylation on Rsus1 and Rsus3 (Figure 3A, C). The phosphorylated Rsus1 showed about 1.5 times larger Km value than that without phosphorylation. That of phosphorylated Rsus2 showed no significant difference. Reduction by one-third was shown on that of the phosphorylated Rsus3 (Table 2). As for the catalytic efficiency, a large reduction was detected on Rsus1, and slight reduction or no effective changes were detected on Rsus2 and Rsus3 (Table 2). These results indicated that effect of phosphorylation of these isoforms was negatively or not so large on their activities of the sucrose synthesis with UDP.

Table 2. Enzymatic kinetics for the sucrose synthesis by the isoforms of rice sucrose synthase.

Fructose+UDP-glucose
Isoform Phosphor-ylation Km (mM) Vmax (nmol min−1 (µg protein)−1) kcat (min−1) catalytic efficiency (min−1 mM−1)
Rsus1 0.27±0.04 1.3±0.20 104±16 389±9.4
+ 0.39±0.13 1.2±0.06 99±4.6 271±69
Rsus2 0.33±0.02 1.4±0.35 108±28 336±109
+ 0.32±0.01 1.6±0.21 130±17 409±64
Rsus3 0.33±0.15 0.58±0.19 20±7.7 66±32
+ 0.24±0.04 0.70±0.06 28±2.3 119±31
Fructose+ADP-glucose
Isoform Phosphor-ylation Km (mM) Vmax (nmol min−1 (µg protein)−1) kcat (min−1) catalytic efficiency (min−1 mM−1)
Rsus1 2.25±1.06 0.70±0.32 56±25 25±0.38
+ 7.80±3.54 1.65±0.2 132±17 18±6.1
Rsus2 3.05±1.48 0.79±0.25 63±20 22±3.9
+ 5.30±0.71 1.00±0.14 80±11 15±0.12
Rsus3 4.40±0.42 0.50±0.07 20±2.8 4.6±1.1
+ 5.65±0.21 0.86±0.09 34±4.0 6.1±1.0

Kinetic parameters, Km and Vmax, were evaluated by Lineweaver–Burk plots (Supplementary Figure 3), which were determined on the reactions for sucrose synthesis (see Figure 3). Values were determined on the correlation between amounts of UDP generated and fructose with UDP-glucose, or ADP generated and fructose with ADP-glucose, respectively. kcat was estimated as Vmax/enzyme content. Catalytic efficiency was evaluated by kcat/Km. Each value±SD is shown (n=5).

It has been reported that sucrose synthase may utilize not only UDP but also ADP in sucrose synthesis (Baroja-Fernández et al. 2003). We examined the activity of sucrose synthesis using ADP-glucose (0 to 10 mM) and fructose under the similar reaction condition. However, in this reaction, a dose-dependency was not clearly shown on the ADP production. When ADP-glucose in the reaction cocktail was enriched to the larger amount ranging between 0.5 to 4.0 mM, Rsus1 and Rsus2 showed a linear correlation between amount of ADP generated and the ADP-glucose added in the reaction mixture (Figure 3D, E). However, Rsus3 still showed very low reactivity. Sufficient production of ADP was detected reproductively when 10 µg of the enzyme was applied to a reaction (Figure 3F). Lineweaver-Burk Plot analysis showed a linear correlation between values of 1/v and 1/[ADP-glucose content] in the reaction mixture (Supplementary Figure 3).

Effect of phosphorylation on the reaction of sucrose synthesis from ADP-glucose and fructose was analyzed. Although Rsus2 showed no significant change on the reaction between with/without its phosphorylation, reactivity of Rsus1 and Rsus3 was greatly enhanced by their phosphorylation (Figure 3D–F). The phosphorylated Rsus3 showed significantly increase of ADP production as compared with those without phosphorylation, although the productivity of ADP on this reaction was still low (Figure 3F). Alteration of Km values to the amount of sucrose significantly was increased (∼100%) on all isoforms by phosphorylation (Table 2). The values of catalytic efficiency were significantly reduced (∼30%) (Table 2). These results indicated that phosphorylation of these isoforms was influenced for repression of the activity of sucrose synthesis with ADP.

In vitro reactions indicated that all of the isoforms catalyzed the reversible reaction of sucrose synthesis not only from UDP-glucose but also from ADP-glucose and fructose, by which sucrose degradation with ADP to generate fructose and ADP-glucose. We analyzed the effect of phosphorylation on the activity of each isoforms of sucrose synthase. The activity of sucrose degradation was enhanced by phosphorylation on all isoforms when either UDP or ADP was used as a substrate. Phosphorylation of the isoforms of sucrose synthase resulted in reduction of the Km values for the reactions of sucrose degradation, suggesting that increase of reactivity and catalytic efficiency may occur for the reactions both with UDP and ADP (Figure 2, Table 1). In contrast, very small effect was detected when they catalyzed the reaction of the sucrose synthesis by the phosphorylated isoforms of sucrose synthase using either UDP-glucose or ADP-glucose (Figure 3, Table 2).Sucrose synthase determines the intracellular levels of UDP-glucose, ADP-glucose and starch, and total yield in potato tubers. Enhancement of sucrose synthase activity results in increased levels of the total yield (Baroja-Fernández et al. 2009). Our findings suggest that phosphorylation of sucrose synthase isoforms may have an effect to enhance the reaction of sucrose degradation and repress the synthetic activity when ADP is used as a substrate. Interestingly, the catalytic efficiency of the sucrose degradation with ADP was greatly enhanced by phosphorylation of sucrose synthase isoforms, while those with UDP gave a little enhancement (Figure 2). This suggests that phosphorylation of the sucrose synthase isoforms may change the equilibrium between sucrose synthesis and degradation, to shift it to be preferable to the sucrose degradation direction.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to H. Kusano, A. Tsunoda, H. Ibe, and E. Otsuka for their technical assistance, valuable discussion, and critical reviews.

Abbreviations

ADP

adenosine diphosphate

ATP

adenosine triphosphate

UDP

uridine diphosphate

NADP

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

SDS

sodium dodecyl sulfate

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data

References

  1. Amor Y, Haigler CH, Johnson S, Wainscott M, Delmer DP (1995) A membrane-associated form of sucrose synthase and its potential role in synthesis of cellulose and callose in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 9353–9357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asano T, Kunieda N, Omura Y, Ibe H, Shimada H (2002) Rice SPK, a calmodulin-like domain protein kinase, is required for storage product accumulation during seed development: Phosphorylation of sucrose synthase is a possible factor. Plant Cell 14: 619–628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahaji A, Li J, Sánchez-López ÁM, Baroja-Fernández E, Muñoz FJ, Ovecka M, Almagro G, Montero M, Ezquer I, Exteberria E, et al. (2016) Sucrose synthase: A unique glycosyltransferase for biocatalytic glycosylation process development. Biotechnol Adv 34: 88–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baroja-Fernández E, Muñoz FJ, Saikusa T, Rodríguez-López M, Akazawa T, Pozueta-Romero J (2003) Sucrose Synthase catalyzes the de novo prouction of ADPglucose linded to starch biosynthasis in heterotrophic tissues of plants. Plant Cell Physiol 44: 500–509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baroja-Fernández E, Muñoz FJ, Montero M, Etxeberria E, Sesma MT, Ovecka M, Bahaji A, Ezquer I, Li J, Prat S, et al. (2009) Enhancing sucrose Synthase activity in transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers results in increased levels of starch, ADPglucose and UDPglucose and total yield. Plant Cell Physiol 50: 1651–1662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barratt DH, Barber L, Kruger NJ, Smith AM, Wang TL, Martin C (2001) Multiple, distinct isoforms of sucrose synthase in pea. Plant Physiol 127: 655–664 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baud S, Vaultier M-N, Rochat C (2004) Structure and expression profile of the sucrose synthase multigene family in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 55: 397–409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bieniawska Z, Barratt DH, Garlick AP, Thole V, Kruger NJ, Martin C, Zrenner R, Smith AM (2007) Analysis of the sucrose synthase gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant J 49: 810–828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chourey PS, Taliercio EW, Carlson SJ, Ruan YL (1998) Genetic evidence that the two isozymes of sucrose synthase present in developing maize endosperm are critical, one for cell wall integrity and the other for starch biosynthesis. Mol Gen Genet 259: 88–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Duncan K, Hardin SC, Huber SC (2006) The three maize sucrose synthase isoforms differ in distribution, localization, and phosphorylation. Plant Cell Physiol 47: 959–971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirose T, Scofield GN, Terao T (2008) An expression analysis profile for the entire sucrose synthase gene family in rice. Plant Sci 174: 534–543 [Google Scholar]
  12. Huber SC, Huber JL, Liao PC, Gage DA, McMichael RW Jr, Chourey PS, Hannah LC, Koch K (1996) Phosphorylation of serine-15 of maize leaf sucrose synthase: Occurrence in vivo and possible regulatory significance. Plant Physiol 112: 793–802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Su JC (1995) Metabolic roles of sucrose synthase: Example of rice isozymes encoded by three isogenes. In: Pontis HG, Salerno GL, Echeverria E (eds) Sucrose: Metabolism, Biochemistry, Physiology and Molecular Biology. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, pp 40–48.
  14. Wang AY, Kao MH, Yang WH, Sayion Y, Liu LF, Lee PD, Su JC (1999) Differentially and developmentally regulated expression of three rice sucrose synthase genes. Plant Cell Physiol 40: 800–807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weckwerth W, Loureiro ME, Wenzel K, Fiehn O (2004) Differential metabolic networks unravel the effects of silent plant phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 7809–7814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zrenner R, Salanoubat M, Willmitzer L, Sonnewald U (1995) Evidence of the crucial role of sucrose synthase for sink strength using transgenic potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant J 7: 97–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Plant Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society for Plant Biotechnology

RESOURCES