Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Chem. 2019 Feb 13;85:585–599. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.02.027

Design, synthesis, and DNA interaction studies of furo-imidazo[3.3.3] propellane derivatives: Potential anticancer agents

Alaa A Hassan a,*, Ashraf A Aly a, Nasr K Mohamed a, Kamal M El Shaieb a, Maysa M Makhlouf a, El-Shimaa MN Abdelhafez b, Stefan Bräse c,d, Martin Nieger e, Kevin N Dalby f, Tamer S Kaoud b,f,*
PMCID: PMC6543821  NIHMSID: NIHMS1023330  PMID: 30878891

Abstract

A large number of natural products containing the propellane scaffold have been reported to exhibit cytotoxicity against several cancers; however, their mechanism of action is still unknown. Anticancer drugs targeting DNA are mainly composed of small planar molecule/s that can interact with the DNA helix, causing DNA malfunction and cell death. The aim of this study was to design and synthesize propellane derivatives that can act as DNA intercalators and/or groove binders. The unique structure of the propellane derivatives and their ability to display planar ligands with numerous possible geometries, renders them potential starting points to design new drugs targeting DNA in cancer cells. New substituted furo-imidazo[3.3.3]propellanes were synthesized via the reaction of substituted alkenylidene-hydrazinecarbothioamides with 2-(1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-2-ylidene) propanedinitrile in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature. The structures of the products were confirmed by a combination of elemental analysis, NMR, ESI-MS, IR and single crystal X-ray analysis. Interestingly, 5c, 5d and 5f showed an ability to interact with Calf Thymus DNA (CT-DNA). Their DNA-binding mode was investigated using a combination of absorption spectroscopy, DNA melting, viscosity, CD spectroscopy measurements, as well as competitive binding studies with several dyes. Their cytotoxicity was evaluated against the NCI-60 panel of cancer cell lines. 5c, 5d and 5f exhibited similar anti-proliferative activity against the A549 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line. Further mechanistic studies revealed their ability to induce DNA damage in the A549 cell line, as well as apoptosis, evidenced by elevated Annexin V expression, enhanced caspase 3/7 activation and PARP cleavage. In this study, we present the potential for designing novel propellanes to provoke cytotoxic activity, likely through DNA binding-induced DNA damage and apoptosis.

Keywords: Furo-imidazo[3.3.3]-propellanes; Alkenylidene-hydrazinecarbothioamides; Dicyanomethylene-1,3-indanedione; DNA non-intercalative interaction; DNA damage induction; Non-small cell lung cancer

1. Introduction

Propellanes are tricyclic entities with a central single bond surrounded by three small to medium rings. Since their discovery 53 years ago, their unusual structure has initiated a great interest in many fields, especially in life sciences because of their presence in several natural products and their various biological activities [1]. Although, there are over 10,000 representatives of this chemical class, new propellanecontaining natural products still being discovered, with unique structures and activity profiles [1]. Several propellanes exhibiting antiviral [2], antifungal [3], antibiotic [4,5] and anticancer [69] activities have been previously described. For example, Dichrocephone B, that was isolated from Dichrocephala benthamii, contains a [3.3.3] propellane core structure fused to a unique oxetane ring (Fig. 1A), exhibits significant cytotoxicity against human oral squamous carcinoma cells (KB), human cervical cancer cells (HeLa), and non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells (A549), with IC50 values of 3.3, 4.1, and 4.5 μM, respectively [8]. Diepoxin δ which was isolated from the fungus Nattrassia Mangiferae (Fig. 1B) inhibits the ability of human fibrosarcoma cells (HT1080) to invade through a matrigel membrane with an IC50 of 0.75 μM [7]. Another example of propellanes with unique structures are Epicochalasines A and B, they were isolated from the liquid culture broth of the fungus Aspergillus flavipes. Their structures have both an adamantane-like structure, as well as a [4.4.3] propellane moiety with 19 stereogenic centers. These compounds have been reported to induce cell cycle arrest in an HL60 leukemia cell line and apoptosis in both HL60 and NB4 leukemia cell lines [9]. Although there are several reports of propellane natural products with considerable cytotoxicity and antitumor activities, little is known about their mechanism of action or their actual targets in cancer cells [1].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of the propellane derivatives Dichrocephone B (A) and Diepoxin δ (B), reported to exhibit cytotoxic activity against several cancers [7,8]. (C) The crystal structure of the new propellane derivative 5b.

DNA is a major target of various anticancer drug discovery efforts [10]. Interaction of small planar aromatic or heteroaromatic molecules with DNA in cancer cells, may cause lengthening, stiffening or unwinding of the DNA helix, inhibit DNA replication, induce DNA damage [11,12] and block cell division which finally can lead to cell death [13]. Generally, drug-DNA interaction occurs through three possible noncovalent modes: intercalation, groove binding and external electrostatic effects. Intercalators bind reversibly by inserting a planar aromatic pharmacophore between adjacent base pairs of double-stranded DNA, which in turn can lead to antitumor activity [14,15]. For example, the metallo-intercalators contain planar, positively charged, polycyclic aromatic ligands [16]. They bind DNA through insertion between the planar bases [17]. Several metallo-intercalators are already used as cancer therapeutics including cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin and nedaplatin [18]. In the same time, targeting the DNA minor groove can be less challenging, the small width of the groove stabilizes the binding by providing several van der Waal’s interactions and/or hydrogen bonding with the nucleobases [19]. Interestingly, several natural products have been known to bind the DNA minor groove, including chromomycin, actinomycin D, distamycin, netropsin, and Hoechst 33258 [20,21].

Here we hypothesis that propellane derivatives designed to carry planar aromatic or non-aromatic ligands can potentially act as DNA intercalators or minor groove binders with promising anti-tumor activity. Several methods are reported for the synthesis of heterocylic [3.3.3]propellanes. Oxa-aza[3.3.3]propellanes were synthesized by Alizadeh et al. [4,2224], Yavari et al. [25], Chen et al. [26] and Zhang et al. [27]. Hassan et al. reported the formation of oxaaza- and bisoxathia-aza[3.3.3]-propellanes via nucleophilic addition of symmetrical and unsymmetrical N1,N2-disubstituted-1,2-dicarbothioamides on dicyanomethylene-1,3-indanedione 1 [28]. The reaction of N,N,N″-(1,ω-alkandiyl)bis-(N″-organylthioureas) with 1 afforded new bis-oxathiaaza[3.3.3]propellanes [29].

Due to our continuous interest in the design and synthesis of new heterocycles with antitumor activity [30,31], in this study we synthesized a new group of hetero[3.3.3]propellanes by reacting heteroyl-hydrazinecarbothioamides with 1 to give furo-imidazo[3.3.3]propellanes [32]. Also, nucleophilic addition of thiocarbohydrazide derivatives with 1 gave furo-imidazo[3.3.3]propellanes [33]. The ability of the new compounds to interact with DNA was examined using several biophysical and biochemical techniques. The cytotoxicity of the compounds towards the NCI-60 panel of cancer cell lines was determined. And the molecular mechanism of three of the new derivatives was further investigated in the A549 non-small cell lung cancer cell line.

2. Results and discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The main purpose of this project was to design a new group of DNA-targeting small molecules using the propellane scaffold. The propellane should provide planar, polyaromatic ligands with enough hydrophobicity to extend into the base-stack of the DNA and/or fit into the DNA minor groove. (Fig. 1 and Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Reactions of 1 with 2a–g in THF at room temperature, showing the mechanism of formation of furo-imidazo[3.3.3]propellanes 5a–g.

In order to synthesize such derivatives, initially we investigated the reactions of substituted (ylidenehydrazinecarbothioamides) 2a–g bearing a selection of aryl, alkyl, alkenyl and heterocyclic substituents with 1 (Scheme 1). Under room temperature and atmospheric air, a mixture of dicyanomethylene-1,3-indanedione (1, 1.25 mmol) and alkenylidene-hydrazinecarbothioamides (2a–g, 1.0 mmol) was stirred in THF for 52–72 hrs. TLC analysis suggested the complete disappearance of compounds 1 and We found that furo-imidazo[3.3.3]propellanes 5a–g were obtained as a colourless crystals in 71–84% yields.

The mass spectrum of 5b, as an example displayed the molecular ion peak at m/z = 456 (11%), which is in agreement with the proposed structure and shows clearly the addition of one molecule of 2b to one molecule of 1 without any elimination. The IR spectrum of 5b in KBr shows a broad band at 3443–3400 cm−1 due to the NH2 group, sharp bands at 2196 and 1728 cm−1, characteristic of a conjugated nitrile and indeno-CO group, respectively. Two absorption bands at 1371 and 987 cm−1 (C═S and C–N str.) were observed as well as a characteristic band for C–O–C at 1102 cm−1. The 1H NMR spectrum of 5b, exhibited a broad exchangeable signal with two protons at 8.50–8.52 ppm due to the NH2 group. A triplet at 0.92–0.96 ppm due to the CH3 group with coupling constant (J = 7.61 Hz). Two upfield multiplets at 1.48–1.54 and 2.28–2.31 are due to CH2–CH2, whereas a downfield multiplet at 6.36–6.39 corresponds to CH═CH, as well as to the aromatic protons. In the 13C NMR spectrum of 5b signals at 189.81, 178.93, and 154.06 are due to indeno-CO, thioxo and CH═N groups, respectively. Two peaks at δc = 49.58 (furan-C3), and 168.17 (furan-C2) are in accordance with the observed trends in δ values for carbon atoms in ‘push-pull’ alkenes [34,35]. Further signals at 81.45 (furan-C4), 103.86 (furan-C5), 110.0 and 115.70 (CH═CH). Three signals at 13.46, 21.24 and 34.32 correspond to the CH3CH2CH2 moiety.

As it is difficult to assess the correct structure based on the NMR spectral data, the structure of these compounds was unequivocally resolved by single crystal X-ray analysis. Specifically, the structure of 2-amino-11((1E, 2E)-hex-2-en-1-ylidene)-amino)-4-oxo-9-(pyridyl-3-yl)-10-thioxo-4H-3a,8b-(epiminomethanoimino)-indeno[1,2-b]furan-3-carbonitrile (5b) was established unambiguously by single crystal X-ray analysis, which confirmed the presence of a propellane system (Fig. 1C and Tables S1S7 in the supporting information). The X-ray crystal structure of 5b clearly shows that the (C4)-(C8) bond length of 1.536 (4) Å has a C—C single bond character and is shared by three different rings C4-C8-N7-C6-N5, C4-C8-O1-C2-C3 and C4-C8-C9-C4-C15. The bond length C(6)-S(6) = 1.658 (3) Å and has C═S (1.645 Å) double bond character. The sums of the angles around C(4) and C(8) are 319° and 337°, respectively revealing that restrained around C4 and C8.

Compounds 2a–g may react either with their sulphur atom, N2 or N4 as nucleophilic sites. On the other hand, it has been reported that the methine carbon of 2a–g had to act as a nucleophile in the sense of an “umpolung” [36]. Thus, several options for interaction between 1 and 2a–g may be expected. It is probable that the products 5a–g are formed from one of the four labile 1:1 adducts. Several alternative structures can be suggested (Fig. 2), but some of these were ruled out based on the 13C NMR spectral data. Comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR for the isomers 58 showed that propellanes 6 and 7 (Fig. 2) could be ruled out. Therefore, X-ray analysis may serve as a useful supplementary tool in determining the correct structure, and confirm that we have the propellane-type structures 5a–g rather than 8a–g.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Structures of possible isomers of compound 5.

It was found that the reaction conditions such as solvent, catalyst, temperature play an important role on the reaction efficiency. Different solvents were investigated, and it was found that tetrahydrofuran (THF) was superior compared to chlorobenzene, acetonitrile, dichloromethane and DMF. The effect of different basic media was investigated. THF without any additions showed high activity, while others such as EtOH/(Et)3N and EtOH/piperidine were less effective. Increasing the amount of 1 to 1.5 mmol or 2 mmol led to a lower yield. High product yield was obtained in the presence of air. Only trace amounts of product were formed when the reaction was performed under nitrogen or argon. The reaction was carried out at different temperatures with THF as the solvent, but low product conversions were observed. Using alkenylidene-hydrazinecarbothioamides with benzyl, allyl, pyridyl and phenyl derivatives, the observed products 5a–g were generated in 71–84% yields. These results indicate that both electronic and steric factors have no significant influence on the efficiency of the reaction. To rationalize the formation of propellanes 5a–g as depicted in scheme 1. The attack of the 2NH group of 2a–g on the C=C double bond of 1 affords the adduct 4a–g via intermediate 3a–g. Intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the OH on the imino group, affords furo-imidazo[3.3.3]propellanes 5a–g (Scheme 1).

2.2. Biological investigation

2.2.1. Anti-proliferative investigation against 60 cancer cell lines at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), USA

The selected compounds were subjected to in vitro anticancer assays against tumor cells in a full panel of 60 cell lines derived from nine different cancer types (leukemia, lung, colon, CNS, melanoma, ovarian, renal, prostate and breast cancers). The compounds were added at single concentration of 10−5 M and the culture was incubated for 48 h. Growth inhibition percent is illustrated in Table 1 and Table S9. 5a, 5b, 5e and 5g exhibited less anticancer activities (As shown in the supporting information, Table S8) if compared to 5c, 5d and 5f (Shown down in Table 1).

Table 1.

% Growth inhibition of compounds 5c, 5d and 5f.

Panel/Cell Line % Growth inhibition
Panel/Cell Line % Growth inhibition
Compound
Compound
5c 5d 5f 5c 5d 5f
Leukemia Melanoma
CCRF-CEM 40.64 −0.22 20.48 LOX IMVI 25.61 5.8 10.87
HL-60 (TB) 29.58 1.34 38.21 MALME-3M 4.81 −4.03 5.73
K-562 32.42 7.18 50.66 M14 40.08 7.13 24.61
MOLT-4 38.9 11.42 34.78 MDA-MB-435 24.92 5.38 22.95
RPMI-8226 48.96 19.75 44.48 SK-MEL-2 10.03 −6.35 0.73
SR 11.28 1.58 39.13 SK-MEL-28 8.57 −10.44 5.82
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer SK-MEL-5 29.89 1.76 31.01
A549/ATCC 39.14 11.24 45.14 UACC-257 2.92 1.42 30.59
EKVX 45.94 17.74 13.24 UACC-62 33.69 15.86 28.42
HOP-92 29.11 15.01 2.89 Ovarian Cancer
HOP-92 21.85 17.02 16.19 IGROV1 19 −5.64 1.44
NCI-H226 37.29 1.65 15.64 OVCAR-3 1.23 18.03
NCI-H23 21.39 5.79 6.86 OVCAR-4 28.3 6.36 21.38
NCI-H322M 15.54 8.05 −0.13 OVCAR-5 15.26 −0.62 7.95
NCI-H460 22.73 −6.31 38.84 OVCAR-8 20.76 6.85 37.13
NCI-H522 43.07 40.92 4.23 NCI/ADR-RES 19.47 −3.89 5.59
Colon Cancer SK-OV-3 18.61 11.82 1.64
COLO 205 6.67 −14.94 28.99 Renal Cancer
HCC-2998 6.4 −9.24 14.04 786-0 25.18 2.86 12.87
HCT-116 48.8 5.9 48.64 A498 15.07 15.4 16.67
HCT-15 38.9 18.27 31.67 ACHN 72.83 4.67 6.49
HT29 31.43 17.77 63.81 CAKI-1 ——— ——— ———
KM12 ——— −1.93 32.87 RXF 393 28.4 −2.11 25.4
SW-620 2.92 −11.86 21.43 SN12C 11.57 3.69 31.97
CNS Cancer TK-10 3.2 −12.49 10.36
SF-268 ———— 5.69 8.88 UO-31 54.99 38.03 61.91
SF-295 33.22 11.51 34.62 Breast Cancer
SF-539 11.92 2.56 0.75 MCF7 57.57 32.37 70.28
SNB-19 5.7 0.31 22.56 MDA-MB-231 25.7 10.27 11.47
SNB-75 34.78 29.2 9.78 HS 578T 20.95 4.66 21.21
U251 27.74 0.31 37.8 BT-549 27.92 17.36 22.29
Prostate Cancer T-47D 55.67 33.16 51.28
PC-3 52.88 19.04 77.28 MDA-MB-468 30.96 −3 12.66
DU-31 ———— −3.61 13.84

As shown in Table 1, Compound 5c exhibited the best activity against renal ACHN cell line with percentage growth inhibition of 73%, whereas, it revealed moderate activity (≥40% inhibition) against leukemia CCRF-CEM & RPMI-8226, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer EKVX, A549 and NCI-H522, colon cancer HCT-116, prostate cancer PC-3, Melanoma M-14, renal cancer UO-31 and breast cancer cell lines MCF7 & T-47D. Compound 5f (Table 1) showed inhibition activity against most cell lines, however, it exhibited significant inhibition against prostate PC-3, colon HT29, renal UO-31 and breast MCF7 cell lines with 77, 64, 62 and 70% inhibition respectively. 5f inhibited the growth of the leukemia cell lines (K-562 and RPMI-8226), the non-small cell lung cancer cell lines (A549), the colon cancer cell line (HCT-116) and the breast cancer cell line (T-47D) with % inhibition > 40%. Also, 5d (Table 1) showed moderate to mild inhibition activity (> 30% inhibition) against the non-small cell lung cancer cell line NCI-H522, the renal cancer cell line UO-31 and the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47-D.

On the other hand, Compound 5g (Supporting information Table S8) revealed relatively the highest growth inhibitory activity against leukemia K-562 cell line with 87% growth inhibition. On the other hand, compounds 5a, 5b and 5e exhibited mild to weak activity against most tested cell lines (Supporting information Table S8). From these results we can conclude that the presence of benzyl or cyclohexyl group would enhance the anti-proliferative activity especially upon increasing the flexibility of the compound (as in compounds 5c and 3f), this extension increased the potency of these compounds against most tested cells. Compounds containing phenyl, ethyl and pyridyl groups did not exhibit remarkable anti-proliferative activity.

According to the screening results, we decided to go further and examine the capability of compounds 5c, 5d and 5f to bind Calf Thymus DNA (CT-DNA) under physiological conditions.

2.2.2. DNA interaction studies

To test our hypothesis that the anticancer activity of propellane derivatives can be attributed to its ability to interact with DNA, several experiments were performed to test the interaction and characterize the possible binding mode (Table 2).

Table 2.

DNA binding parameters for complexes 5c, 5d and 5f.

Compounds Binding constant Ka (M−1)a nb ΔTmc (°C) Hoechst DC50 (μM)d DAPI DC50 (μM)d
5c 0.39 × 105 ± 5291 25.8 ± 0.12 2.18 9.1 ± 2.5 6.2 ± 1.6
5d 0.10 × 105 ± 623.0 30.8 ± 0.08 1.93 19.1 ± 3.7 17.5 ± 5.1
5f 0.30 × 105 ± 8243 25.9 ± 0.25 1.92 33.7 ± 5.1 15.3 ± 8
a

DNA binding constant by UV–vis spectroscopy method.

b

[Polynucleotide Phosphate]/([Bound compound]) Calculated from the UV–Vis titrations of compounds with ds-Polynucleotides.

c

Change in the melting temperature of CT-DNA.

d

The concentration of each inhibitor needed to displace 50% DAPI or Hoechst 33258 from the DNA minor groove at saturating binding levels.

2.2.2.1. UV–Vis spectroscopy

Absorption spectroscopy is one of several techniques used to assess DNA-ligand binding, which results in double helix conformational changes that lead to UV spectrum alteration [37]. The interaction of any ligand with a DNA helix may result in a hyperchromic or hypochromic effect, as well as a red or blue shift. The absorbance spectra of a buffered solution of 5c, 5d or 5f with different concentrations of Calf Thymus DNA (CT-DNA) revealed a consistent hypochromic effect over the 300–340 nm range, without any significant red or blue shift (Fig. 3AC). Cheng-Yong et al, reported that the breaking of the DNA secondary structure that accompanies helix axis contraction is expected to produce a hyperchromic effect, while hypochromic effects can result from secondary structure stabilization by intercalation or groove binding [38]. In addition, Lafayette et al. and others have suggested that a combination of both a red shift and a hypochromic effect is indicative of an intercalation. Thus, a hypochromic effect in the absence of any red/blue shift, as seen with the propellane derivatives 5c, 5d and 5f, suggests the possibility of a non-intercalative binding mechanism (e.g. groove binding), rather than intercalation [3941].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Changes of UV/vis spectra of 5c (A) at 20μM, 5d (B) at 20μM and 5f (C) at 20 μM; upon the titration of CT-DNA at pH = 7, (buffer 50mM sodium cacodylate containing 1% DMSO). Scatchard plot of 5c (D), 5d (E) and 5f (F)–DNA binding. The absorbance at 315 nm were fitted to Eq. (1) (the methods section).

Based on these UV–vis titration curves (Fig. 3AC), the binding constants (Ka) and the n parameter, were calculated by fitting the absorption titration at 315 nm to the neighbor exclusion model of McGhee and von Hippel [42,43] (as described in the methods section). As another evidence of a non-intercalative binding mode, the scatchard plots (r/Cf vs r) of the three compounds (Fig. 3DF) exhibited downward curvature, suggesting the binding of a single molecule along the DNA polymer without any other nearby ligand, a phenomenon that is also referred to as neighbor exclusion [42,43]. The association constant Ka as well as the n-parameter were calculated using the Scatchard plot analysis (Fig. 3DF). As shown in Table 2, 5c and 5f showed 3–4 fold higher affinity than 5d towards CT-DNA with Ka = 0.39 × 105, 0.3 × 105 and 0.1 × 105 M−1 and n of ~26, 26 and 31 respectively, the observation that can be attributed to the hydrophobicity of the benzyl gp in 5c and cyclohexyl gp in 5f if compared to the allyl substituent in 5d (Scheme 1).

2.2.2.2. Thermal melting studies

Thermal denaturation experiments were performed to further assess the effect of the ligand binding on the CT-DNA helix conformation. DNA melting temperature (Tm) is the temperature at which half of the DNA denatures or becomes unwound. Intercalation into the helix is known to elevate this temperature by 5–8 °C due to the enhanced helix stability. While, the other binding modes (non-intercalative) as groove or electrostatic binding cause a limited changes in the DNA melting temperature [4447]. Denaturation of the helix was monitored by following the UV absorbance of the CTDNA at 260 nm as a function of the temperature. Results shown in Fig. 4, revealed that the three propellane derivatives 5c, 5d and 5f similarly affected the CT-DNA double helix with limited changes in the melting temperature ΔTm of 2.18, 1.93 and 1.92 °C respectively (Table 2) [37,48]. The results that provide further evidence for the suggested non-intercalative binding mode of the propellane derivatives to CT-DNA. Similarly, several reports have shown that the groove binders do not exhibit a large increase in the melting temperature if compared to the intercalators. For examples: Kumar et al. [45] showed that the cationic styryl dye DSMI that binds DNA in the minor groove did not show any effect on the melting temperature of CT-DNA as Tm was estimated to be 80 °C in absence and presence of DSMI. Ma et al. [46] has reported the binding mode of Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and aflatoxin G1 (AFG1) to CT-DNA to be mainly through the groove. The binding mode that was evidenced by showing that the AFB1 and AFG1 caused a limited change in CT-DNA melting temperature with ΔTm of 1 and 2 °C respectively. Sarwar et al. [47] have investigated the binding mode of coumarin to DNA. Tm of CT-DNA in absence and presence of coumarin was 66.8 ± 1 and 68.3 ± 1 respectively, suggesting a limited effect of coumarin on the DNA stability and supported their notion that coumarin possibly binds the minor groove of the Ct-DNA.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Plots of the Melting curves of ct-DNA (100 μM) in absence and presence of 50 uM of 1, 2 and 3 at pH = 7.0 (buffer 50 mM Na-cacodylate containing 1% 1,4-Dioxane). Experiments have been repeated two times and the data were consistent.

2.2.2.3. Viscosity studies

CT-DNA viscosity changes upon interaction with any ligand have been widely used as a marker for the possible binding mode in solution [49,50]. If the interaction is accompanied by an increase in viscosity, this can be evidence of an intercalation mechanism, where the DNA helix lengthens to accommodate ligand binding. A decrease in viscosity results from partial intercalation that only causes bending or possibly shortening of the DNA helix. While, DNA groove binders are reported to cause limited (positive or negative) or no change in viscosity [46,47,49,51]. For example the groove binder Hoechst 33258 does not affect the relative viscosity of CT-DNA solution as it has been reported to have no effect on the axial length of the DNA helix [50,52]. As shown in Fig. 5A, we followed the change in the values of relative specific viscosity (η/η0)1/3, (where η and η0 are the specific viscosity of CT-DNA in the presence of different doses of each propellane derivative or 10% 1,4-dioxane) as a function of r(r = [Ligand]/[CT-DNA], the results emphasized a very limited increase in the viscosity caused by the three derivatives. The ability of the compounds to increase the viscosity of DNA follows the order of 5f > 5c > 5d, where the cyclohexane substituent was the most effective in enhancing viscosity compared to the benzyl or allyl derivatives. Although the propellane derivatives exhibited dose response viscosity enhancement, the increase was limited if compared to the effect of Cisplatin (Fig. 5A), a known DNA intercalator reported to have a pronounced enhancement on CT-DNA viscosity [53]. These observations suggest that the minor effect on viscosity of the propellanes may be a result of binding the DNA groove without having a drastic effect on the axial length of DNA (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

(A) Dose response effect of 5c, 5d, 5f and Cisplatin on the relative viscosity of CT-DNA at room temperature, [CT-DNA] = 300 μM. Three independent experiments were performed and average values are shown, the error bars represent ± SD. (B) Circular dichroism spectra of CT-DNA (50 μM) in the absence and presence of 5c, 5d and 5f (20 μM) at Ph = 7, (buffer 50mM sodium cacodylate containing 0.4% 1,4-Dioxane). The cuvette path length was 10 mm. Two independent experiments were performed and average values were calculated.

2.2.2.4. Circular dichroism spectroscopy

Circular dichroism provides a more detailed study of the possible conformational changes that happen to the DNA helix upon interaction with a ligand. In this experiment, we recorded the CD spectra of 50 μM calf thymus DNA in the absence and presence of 20 μM of each propellane derivative. As expected, the CT-DNA (Fig. 5B) showed two bands in the UV region, one at 245 nm (negative band) caused by the right-handed helicity and one at 275 nm (positive band) due to base stacking [48,50]. The interaction of CT-DNA with the three derivatives resulted in small increase in the intensity of the positive band of free CT-DNA while 5d is the only derivative that caused a limited change in the negative band (Fig. 5B). Suggesting different effects of the derivatives with benzyl and cyclohexyl substituents (5c and 5f) if compared to the allyl derivative (5d). Several reports have shown that the non-intercalative DNA binding results in limited to no change in the DNA CD spectra if compared to the DNA intercalators. The groove binding and electrostatic interaction have minor perturbation on the base stacking and helicity bands making them less efficient in changing the DNA helix conformation [46,47,54]. Although, a recent study highlights the limitation of the CD technique in identifying the mode of ligand binding to DNA [55]. The limited changes of the CD spectra that were observed by the propellane derivatives (Fig. 5B) still suggest a non-intercalative binding mode rather than an intercalative one that is expected to cause a more drastic effect on the recorded Cd spectra.

2.2.2.5. Dye displacement assays

These assays were performed to investigate the possible binding mode of the propellanes to the DNA helix. The DNA binding mode can be examined using a DNA binding dye that has a known, well-characterized, binding mode. Replacing such a dye by a ligand may suggest the ligand binding site. Thus, intercalator ligands are expected to replace an intercalator dye, such as ethidium bromide (EB) or thiazole orange (TO), while a groove binder is expected to replace a groove binding dye, such as DAPI or Hoechst 33258 [46,47,52,56,57]. In this experiment, we tested the effect of the new propellane derivatives on the ability of EB or TO dye to intercalate with CT-DNA and DAPI or Hoechst 33258 dye to bind the CT-DNA groove. DAPI has been reported to bind the DNA minor groove (in the case of A–T rich DNA) in addition to its ability to intercalate with the DNA (in the case of G–C rich DNA) [56,58]. The calf thymus DNA used in this study is 41.9 mol % G-C and 58.1 mol % A-T, which makes DAPI to act mostly as a minor groove binder in this experiment. Hoechst 33258 dye is another well-known groove-binder [42]. The binding stoichiometry of DAPI and Hoechst 3328 with CT-DNA has been reported to be 20 base pairs for each dye molecule and the dissociation constants were estimated to be 5 and 3 nM respectively [52]. Ethidium bromide and thiazole orange were reported to have binding stoichiometry of 1.5 base pairs for each dye molecule which is consistent among all DNA intercalators. Their dissociation constants were estimated to be 0.14 and 0.5 μM respectively [52,59].

Using 40 μM CT-DNA, we examined the ability of the new propellanes to displace these dyes at a saturating binding level (2 μM TO, EB or Hoechst 33258 and 6 μM DAPI). The addition of EB or TO to CTDNA exhibited a drastic fluorescence enhancement due to their intercalation within the DNA base pairs. The continuous addition of different doses of each propellane did not show any significant change in the fluorescence intensity (Fig. 6C and 6D). Suggesting the inability of these propellanes to replace either EB or TO from DNA helix and provide another evidence for the non-intercalative binding mode [46,47]. In the same time and as shown in Fig. 6A and 6B, the three propellane derivatives 5c, 5d and 5f were able to replace the minor groove binder Hoechst 33258 dye from CT-DNA in a dose dependent manner with EC50′s 9, 19 and 34 μM respectively (Table 2) as well as the DAPI dye with EC50′s of 6.2, 17.5 and 15.3 μM respectively (Table 2). Several previous reports have shown groove binding molecules replacing Hoechst 33258 [46,47] or DAPI [5658] dye from the minor groove of the DNA helix, resulting in decreased fluorescence intensity of Hoechst-DNA or DAPI-DNA system. These experiments suggest the binding mode of these new propellanes to be groove binding rather than intercalation, the observation that requires several future experiments to be confirmed.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

(A) % Relative fluorescence intensity of titration of CT-DNA (40 μM) and Hoechest 33258 (2 μM) (B) CT-DNA (40 μM) and DAPI (6 μM) (C) CT-DNA (40 μM) and Thiazole Orange (2 μM) (D) CT-DNA (40 μM) and Ethidium Bromide (2 μM) with different doses of each inhibitor. Values represent the normalized average of the fluorescence intensity recorded for three different wells per each inhibitor concentration.

2.2.3. Anticancer activity

The results mentioned above support our hypothesis that propellane derivatives designed to carry planar polycyclic ligands can interact with DNA and we provide data supporting the notion that they act as nonintercalative binders probably through the DNA groove. It was therefore important to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the anti-proliferative effects of these compounds in a cancer cell model, such as the non-small cell lung cancer cell line A549.

2.2.3.1. Propellane derivatives induce DNA damage and inhibit the growth of non-small cell lung cancer cell line A549

Induction of DNA damage is one of the major drivers of cancer cell growth arrest and death. Several generations of antineoplastic agents work mainly by induction of DNA damage [60]. Numerous reports have shown that some DNA minor groove binders can cause DNA damage even without acting as DNA alkylating agents. For example, Varadarajan et al. have emphasized the DNA damage and cytotoxicity caused by the minor groove binding of several methyl sulfonate esters [60], while Bales et al. have studied the mechanism of DNA damage caused by the minor groove binding of copper-phenanthroline conjugates in several cancer cell lines [61].

S009–131, a coumarin-chalcone hybrid, has been reported to exhibit anti-proliferative and anti-tumour activity. Its ability to induce DNA damage resulted from its potential binding to the DNA minor groove. Incubation of cancer cells with S009–131 resulted in an enhanced γH2AX phosphorylation level (a well-known DNA damage marker) where highest expression was observed at 24 h [62]. And finally Saini et al. have introduced a small molecule named CT-1, as an orally active minor groove binder, it induces DNA damage in several breast cancer cell lines, leading to p53-dependent apoptosis and cell death [63].

To examine the effect of the newly developed groove binders on DNA damage in A549 cells, we treated the cells with different doses of each inhibitor for 12 hrs and then the effect of the inhibitors on γ-H2AX phosphorylation at Ser139 was monitored by immunoblotting. As mentioned earlier, γH2AX is a DNA damage response signaling protein, whose phosphorylation is an important marker for DNA damage. As shown in Fig. 7A, 5c, 5d and 5f induced γH2AX phosphorylation in a dose dependent manner, with robust induction at 25 μM although 10 μM of 5f was enough to induce the DNA damage. Interestingly, as shown previously with other groove binders, the DNA damage caused by the propellane derivatives was accompanied by cellular growth arrest. Fig. 7B shows a dose-response suppression of A549 cell proliferation by 5c, 5d and 5f with IC50s of 2.2, 5.2 and 2.6 μM after 72 h of treatment. The effect of cisplatin, a standard DNA intercalator, on A549 cell proliferation was examined in the same experiment (Fig. 7B) and showed IC50s of 10 μM. The lower IC50 observed for compound 5c and 5f was mainly explained by their ability to induce the DNA damage at considerably lower dose than 5d as assessed after 12 h of treatment and shown in Fig. 6A besides their enhanced affinity towards DNA helix that were estimated in Table 2. The enhanced hydrophobicity of 5c and 5f may also improve their cellular internalization if compared to 5d.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

The DNA binding properties of 5c, 5d and 5f induced the DNA damage and inhibited the proliferation of the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer A549 cell line. (A) Whole-cell extracts of A549 cells treated with different doses of 5c, 5d and 5f for 12 hrs, were immunoblotted for phosphorylated DNA damage response signaling protein γH2AX (pH2AX-Ser139). Pan-actin was used as a loading control. (B) The anti-proliferative potency of 5c, 5d, 5f and Cisplatin, A549 cells were incubated with different doses of each compound for 72 h and assessed the resultant impact on cell viability by the MTS assay (Promega) (Error bars: ± Standard Deviation (n = 3)) from which half-inhibitory (IC50 ± SEM) concentrations were derived and shown in the down table.

2.2.3.2. Apoptosis induction in non-small cell lung cancer cell line A549

As a consequence of the DNA damage induction, apoptosis is known to be the potential route of cell death [64]. Hoechst 33258, a minor groove binding dye, has been reported to act as a potent inducer of apoptosis in several human mesothelioma cell lines [65]. Saini et al. introduced a curcumin-triazole conjugate as another example of a minor groove binder that inhibited the viability of breast cancer cell lines by causing cell cycle arrest at the S phase and induction of apoptosis [63]. Numerous benzimidazole derivatives have also been reported as minor groove binders, and for instance, 5-Phenyl-2-p-tolyl-1H-benzimidazole has been shown to induce the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in leukemia cell lines by activating caspase 9 and caspase 3 [66].

After justifying the ability of the new propellane derivatives as DNA damage inducers, we also examined their ability to trigger apoptosis. Four doses of each derivative were tested in A549 cells (0, 10, 100 and 200 μM of 5c, 5d and 5f). Fig. 8A represents the percentage of the cells that showed early and late apoptosis after 40 and 60 hrs of treatment. It is clear that the three propellane derivatives induce the apoptosis of A549 cells in a dose-dependent manner, as judged by single cell assays using Annexin V and Caspase 3/7 activity as markers (visualized using the IncuCyte zoom microscope). Moreover, treatment of A549 cells with different doses of 5c, 5d and 5f resulted in an increase in cleaved PARP, another marker of apoptosis induction [67]. These data support the notion that the induction of DNA damage and apoptosis can be the major mechanisms of death caused by the new propellane derivatives.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Treatment of 5c, 5d and 5f induced apoptosis in A549 cell line. (A) Caspase-3/7 activity and Annexin V integration was significantly increased in the treated cells in a dose-dependent manner. The apoptosis analysis was performed using the IncuCyte® ZOOM equipment with a 10X objective at indicated time points. A549 cells were treated with different doses of each compound and the IncuCyte Caspase-3/7 or Annexin V reagents. Apoptotic cells number was normalized to the percentage area coverage (confluency) at the final time point. Error bars: SEM (n = 3). (B) Western blotting of lysates from A549 cells treated for 24 h with 5c, 5d and 5f, immunoblotted for increased level of the apoptosis marker cleaved PARP. Vinculin was used as a loading control.

3. Conclusion

It has been reported that numerous natural products containing the propellane substructure exhibit cytotoxicity against several cancers. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that propellane scaffold carrying one or two planar ligands can exhibit cytotoxicity by direct interaction with the DNA helix. We started by designing several furoimidazo[3.3.3]propellanes derivatives (5a–g) and developed a new method allowing general and effective synthesis of these derivatives with fairly high yields in a relatively short reaction time with easy work-up procedures. It was found that solvent, temperatures and catalyst may all play a critical role on the reaction efficiency. Also, the electrophilic C/C double bond in the acceptor plays an important role on the type of nucleophilic site of addition. Interestingly, the anti-proliferative activity observed by these compounds against A549 NSCLC cells is directly correlated to their ability to bind CT-DNA (determined using UV–Vis spectroscopy). The ability of the compounds to replace the minor groove binding dyes Hoechst 33258 and DAPI, without any effect on the intercalator dyes ethidium bromide and thiazole orange suggests that these new derivatives may act as groove binders rather than DNA intercalators. This conclusion was supported by UV–Vis spectroscopic data, as well as thermal denaturation, viscosity and CD studies that suggested a non-intercalative binding mode. Finally, the mechanism of cell death caused by these compounds was attributed to their DNA damaging ability and subsequent induction of apoptosis. In this study, we provide a new group of propellane-dependent that probably act as DNA groove binders. Although several future studies are required to support this finding, these new derivatives may act as excellent starting points to develop new drugs that can efficiently bind DNA and cause cancer cell death. In addition, this is the first study that showed a possible mechanism for the cytotoxicity caused by propellane containing compounds, through their ability to interact with DNA in cancer cells.

4. Material and methods

4.1. Chemistry

Melting points (mp’s) were recorded on a Gallenkamp melting point apparatus (Gallenkamp, UK), by using open capillaries and are uncorrected. NMR data was recorded on a Bruker AM 400 spectrophotometer (Germany), The 1H NMR (400.13 MHz) and 13C NMR (100.6 MHz). Chemical shifts were reported in ppm from tetra-methylsilane using solvent resonance in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solutions as the internal standard. The 13C NMR signals were assigned on the basis of DEPT 135/90 spectra. The mass spectra were obtained on Finnigan MAT 312) (Germany) instrument using electron impact ionization (70 eV). The IR spectra were recorded on Bruker Alpha FT-IR instrument (Germany) with samples prepared as potassium bromide pellets. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on precoated plates (silica gel 60 Pf254), and zones were visualized with ultraviolet (UV) light. Elemental analyses were determined by the using an Elemenatar 306 (Germany).

4.1.1. Starting materials

Substituted alkenylidene-hydrazinecarbothioamides 2a–g were prepared by the reaction of 4-substituted thiosemicarbazide with the proper aldehyde according to the published procedures in literature (2a [68], 2b [69], 2c [70], 2d [68] and 2e [70]).

(E)-N-cyclohexyl-2-((E)-hex-2-en-1-ylidene)hy-drazinecarbothioamide (2f)

Yield: 2.35 g (93%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 56–57 °C.

IR (KBr): 3375–3446 (NH), 2928–2852 (Ali-CH), 1643 (C═N), 1517 (NH def. and C–N str.), 1364, 982 (C═S and C–N str.) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.90–0.94 (t, J = 7.63 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.26–1.28 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.45–1.48 (m, 2H, cyclic-CH2), 1.62–1.64 (m, 4H, cyclic-CH2), 1.78–1.80 (m, 4H, cyclic-CH2), 2.14–2.18 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.21–2.24 (m, 1H, cyclic-CH), 6.12–6.14 (m, 2H, CH═CH), 7.32 (br, 1H, cyclohexyl-NH), 7.51–7.53 (m, 1H, CH═N), 9.74 (br, 1H, NH).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.14 (CH3), 22.11 (CH2), 25.16 (CH2), 26.08 (cyclic-CH2), 33.42 (cyclic-CH2), 35.17 (cyclic-CH2), 41.22 (cyclic-CH), 124.86, 126.23 (CH═CH), 144.16 (CH═N), 176.12 (C═S).

MS: m/z (%) = 253 [M+, 23], 219 (7), 141 (6), 98 (1 0 0), 83 (33), 69 (17).

Anal. Calcd for C13H23N3S (253.16): C, 61.62, H, 9.15; N, 16.58; S, 12.65. Found: C, 61.73; H, 9.27; N, 16.46; S, 12.55.

(E)-N-benzyl-2-pentylidenehydrazinecarbothioamide (2g)

Yield: 1.99 g (80%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 42–43 °C.

IR (KBr): 3362–3352 (NH), 3062 (Ar–CH), 2953–2864 (Ali-CH), 1632 (C═N), 1603 (Ar–C═C), 1519 (NH def. and C–N str.), 1355, 973 (C═S and C–N) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.88–0.90 (t, J = 7.60 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.28–1.32 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.38–1.42 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.18–2.22 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.93 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 7.30–7.35 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.36–7.41 (m, 3H, Ar–H and CH═N), 7.58 (br, 1H, NH–CH2Ph), 9.85 (br, 1H, NH).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.41 (CH3), 21.52 (CH2), 28.12 (CH2), 33.11 (CH2), 48.22 (CH2Ph), 125.64, 127.12, 128.66 (Ar–CH), 137.16 (Ar–C), 148.22 (CH═N), 178.33 (C═S).

Anal. Calcd for C13H19N3S (249.13): C, 62.61, H, 7.68; N, 16.85; S, 12.86. Found: C, 62.50; H, 7.80; N, 16.96; S, 12.74.

4.1.2. Synthesis of Furo-imidazo[3.3.3]Propellanes (5a–g)

General procedure

A stirred solution of substituted 1.0 mmol of alkenylidene-hydrazinecarbothioamide 2a–g in dry THF (20 mL) was added to dicyanomethylene-1,3-indanedione (1, 1.25 mmol) in dry THF (15 mL). The mixture was stirred for 3 hrs. The reddish-brown mixture was allowed to stand for 52–72 hrs (monitored by TLC) at room temperature during which time colorless crystals of 5b were precipitated. The precipitate was filtered off, washed with 5 mL of THF, dried and recrystallized from ethanol. The other derivatives 5a, c–g were subjected to PLC (plate layer chromatography) using Toluene/ EtOAc (10:7).

(3aS,8bR)-2-amino-11-((E)-((E)-hex-2-en-1-ylidene)amino)-4-oxo-9-phenyl-10-thioxo-4H-3a,8b-(epiminomethanoimino)indeno[1,2-b]-furan-3-carbonitrile (5a).

Yield: 0.359 g (79%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 250–252 °C.

IR (KBr): 3421–3392 (NH2), 2957–2869 (Ali-CH), 2195 (CN), 1722 (CO), 1649 (C═N), 1577 (Ar–C═C), 1367, 985 (C═S and C–N str.), 1078 (C–O–C) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.82–0.84 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 7.62 Hz,), 1.35–1.37 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.05–2.11 (m, 2H, CH2), 6.45–6.48 (m, 2H, CH═CH), 7.44–7.57 (m, 5H, Ar–H and CH═N), 7.78–7.84 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.86–7.91 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 8.86–8.88 (br, 2H, NH2).

13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 14.52 (CH3), 22.64 (CH2), 35.87 (CH2), 47.73 (furan-C3), 82.47 (furan-C4), 103.91 (furan-C5), 111.05, 116.14 (CH═CH), 116.75 (CN), 125.89, 126.71, 126.93, 127.12, 127.64, 128.19, 130.37 (Ar–CH), 136.53, 137.72, 142.93 (Ar–C), 156.41 (CH═N), 169.15 (furan-C-2), 180.17 (C═S), 190.29 (indeno-CO).

MS: m/z (%) = 455 (M·+, 100), 301 (32), 154 (29), 135 (32).

Anal. Calcd. for C25H21N5O2S (455.53): C, 65.92; H, 4.65; N, 15.37; S, 7.04. Found: C, 66.06; H, 4.52; N, 15.22; S, 6.91.

(3aS,8bR)-2-amino-11-((E)-((E)-hex-2-en-1-ylidene)amino)-4-oxo-9-(pyridin-3-yl)-10-thioxo-4H-3a,8b-(epiminomethanoimino)indeno[1,2-b]furan-3-carbonitrile (5b)

Yield: 0.383 g (84%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 244–246 °C.

IR (KBr): 3443–3400 (NH2), 2961–2871 (Ali-CH), 2196 (CN), 1728 (CO), 1648 (CdbndN), 1595 (ArsbndCdbndC), 1371, 987 (CdbndS and CsbndN str.), 1102 (C–O–C) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 0.92–0.96 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 7.61 Hz,), 1.48–1.54 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.28–2.31 (m, 2H, CH2), 6.36–6.39 (m, 2H, CH═CH), 7.60–7.61 (m, 3H, Ar–H and CH═N), 7.75–7.78 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.79–7.81 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.99–8.02 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 8.50–8.52 (br, 2H, NH2), 8.71–8.72 (m, 1H, Ar–H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 13.46 (CH3), 21.24, 34.32 (CH2), 49.58 (furan-C-3), 81.45 (furan-C-4), 103.86 (furan-C-5), 110.0, 115.7 (CH═CH), 116.64 (CN), 124.25, 124.64, 125.99, 126.94, 132.78, 134.42, 137.09, 140.81(Ar–CH), 139.22, 141.36, 146.39 (Ar–C), 154.06 (CH═N), 168.17 (furan-C-2), 178.93 (C═S), 189.81 (indeno-CO).

MS: m/z (%) = 456 (M·+, 11), 414 (8), 320 (54), 154 (1 0 0), 136 (72).

Anal. Calcd. for C24H20N6O2S (456.52): C, 63.14; H, 4.42; N, 18.41; S, 7.02. Found: C, 62.97; H, 4.51; N, 18.54; S, 6.89.

3aS,8bR)-2-amino-9-benzyl-11-((E)-((E)-hex-2-en-1-ylidene)amino)-4-oxo-10-thioxo-4H-3a,8b-(epiminomethanoimino)indeno[1,2-b]furan3-carbonitrile (5c)

Yield: 0.361 g (77%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 236–238 °C.

IR (KBr): 3422–3390 (NH2), 2959–2870 (Ali-CH), 2196 (CN), 1727 (CO), 1647 (C═N), 1603 (Ar–C═C), 1377, 940 (C═S and C–N str.), 1074 (C–O–C) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.87–0.91 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 7.63 Hz,), 1.39–1.41 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.09–2.11 (m, 2H, CH2), 5.15 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.17–6.30 (m, 2H, CH═CH), 7.00–7.19 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.55–7.75 (m, 5H, Ar–H and CH═N), 7.80–7.92 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 8.75–8.76 (br, 2H, NH2).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.54 (CH3), 22.45 (CH2), 35.86 (CH2), 48.42 (CH2Ph), 48.77 (furan-C3), 82.03 (furan-C4), 105.53 (furan-C5), 110.7, 116.0 (CH═CH), 116.82 (CN), 125.22, 125.78, 125.87, 127.04, 127.64, 129.35, 132.82 (Ar–CH), 136.61, 137.38, 144.58 (Ar–C), 154.65 (CH═N), 169.81 (furan-C2), 181.03 (C═S), 190.01 (indeno-CO).

MS: m/z (%) = 469 (M·+, 100), 427 (91, 320 (36), 149 (64), 91 (81), 77 (55).

Anal. Calcd. for C26H23N5O2S (469.56): C, 66.50; H, 4.94; N, 14.91; S, 6.83. Found: C, 66.62; H, 5.06; N, 15.10; S, 6.71.

(3aS,8bR)-9-allyl-2-amino-11-((E)-((E)-hex-2-en-1-ylidene)amino)-4-oxo-10-thioxo-4H-3a,8b-(epiminomethanoimino)indeno[1,2-b]furan-3-carbonitrile (5d)

Yield: 0.306 g (73%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 190–191 °C.

IR (KBr): 3403–3332 (NH2), 2960–2870 (Ali-CH), 2198 (CN), 1720 (CO), 1649 (C═N), 1604 (Ar–C═C), 1373, 935 (C═S and C–N str.), 1092 (C–O–C) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.82–0.85 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 7.63 Hz,), 1.37–1.39 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.09–2.12 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.28–4.32 (m, 2H, allyl-CH2N), 5.04–5.08 (m, 2H, allyl-CH2 = ), 5.77–5.79 (m, 1H, allyl-CH = ), 6.06–6.16 (m, 2H, CH═CH), 7.57–7.61 (m, 3H, Ar–H and CH═N), 7.73–7.75 (m, 1H, Ar–H),7.84–7.86 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 8.20–8.23 (br, 2H, NH2)

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.54 (CH3), 22.72 (CH2), 35.85 (CH2), 47.75 (allyl-CH2N), 47.72 (furan-C3), 79.66 (furan-C4), 104.0 (furan-C5), 111.12, 116.31 (CH═CH), 116.91 (CN), 118.41 (allyl-CH2 = ), 125.99, 127.02, 128.79, 132.85 (Ar–CH), 134.82 (allyl-CH = ), 137.02, 144.86 (Ar–C), 155.05 (CH═N), 169.50 (furan-C2), 181.12 (C═S), 190.70 (indeno-CO).

MS: m/z (%) = 419 (M·+, 100), 377 (71), 320 (12), 265 (12), 154 (43), 99 (11).

Anal. Calcd. for C22H21N5O2S (419.50): C, 62.99; H, 5.05; N, 16.69; S, 7.64. Found: C, 63.16; H, 4.91; N, 16.54; S, 7.72.

(3aS,8bR)-2-amino-9-ethyl-11-((E)-((E)-hex-2-en-1-ylidene)amino)-4-oxo-10-thioxo-4H-3a,8b-(epiminomethanoimino)indeno[1,2-b]furan-3-carbonitrile (5e)

Yield: 0.289 g (71%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 200–202 °C.

IR (KBr): 3409–3321 (NH2), 2961–2870 (Ali-CH), 2199 (CN), 1721 (CO), 1647 (C═N), 1603 (Ar–C═C), 1376, 934 (C═S and C–N str.), 1084 (C–O–C) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 0.85–0.88 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 7.65 Hz,), 1.13–1.17 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 6.71 Hz,), 1.40–1.45 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.14–2.19 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.83–3.87 (q, 2H, CH2, J = 6.71 Hz,), 6.18–6.30 (m, 2H, CH═CH), 7.82–7.85 (m, 3H, Ar–H and CH═N), 7.94–7.97 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 8.21–8.24 (br, 2H, NH2).

13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δc = 13.21 (CH3), 13.48 (CH3), 21.32 (CH2), 34.23 (CH2), 44.16 (CH2), 48.02 (furan-C-3), 78.00 (furan-C-4), 104.39 (furan-C-5), 112.0, 115.91 (CH═CH), 116.12 (CN), 125.17, 125.60, 127.58, 128.32 (Ar–CH), 137.28, 144.51 (Ar–C), 157.02 (CH═N), 165.83 (furan-C-2), 179.76 (C═S), 191.08 (indenoCO).

MS: m/z (%) = 407 (M·+, 100), 320 (44), 253 (26), 154 (63), 87 (24).

Anal. Calcd. for C21H21N5O2S (407.49): C, 61.90; H, 5.19; N, 17.19; S, 7.87. Found: C, 62.02; H, 5.23; N, 17.11; S, 7.93.

(3aS,8bR)-2-amino-9-cyclohexyl-11-((E)-((E)-hex-2-en-1-ylidene) amino)-4-oxo-10-thioxo-4H-3a,8b-(epiminomethanoimino)indeno[1,2-b]-furan-3-carbonitrile (5f)

Yield: 0.341 g (74%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 205–207 °C.

IR (KBr): 3416–3328 (NH2), 2931–2856 (Ali-CH), 2196 (CN), 1725 (CO), 1650 (C═N), 1601 (Ar–C═C), 1347, 981 (C═S and C–N str.), 1101 (C–O–C) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.84–0.86 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 7.66 Hz,), 1.29–1.39 (m, 4H, cyclohexyl-CH2), 1.41–1.42 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.65–1.70 (m, 4H, cyclohexyl-CH2), 1.80–1.83 (m, 2H, cyclohexyl-CH2), 2.07–2.11 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.15–2.17 (m, 1H, cyclohexyl-CH), 6.16–6.18 (m, 2H, CH═CH), 7.58–7.66 (m, 3H, Ar–H and CH═N), 7.77–7.89 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 8.70–8.73 (br, 2H, NH2).

13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δc = 14.52 (CH3), 22.80 (CH2), 27.24, 30.17, 35.83 (cyclohexyl-CH2), 35.97 (CH2), 48.11 (furan-C-3), 59.62 (cyclohexyl-CH), 80.50 (furan-C-4), 104.12 (furan-C-5), 111.64, 116,41 (CH═CH) 116.89 (CN), 124.52, 127.16, 128.99, 132.73 (Ar–CH), 137.33, 145.99 (Ar–C), 154.97 (CH═N), 168.79 (furan-C-2), 181.59 (C═S), 190.37 (indeno-CO).

MS: m/z (%) = 461 (M·+, 100), 320 (44), 32 (9), 419 (18), 392 (22), 154 (81).

Anal. Calcd. for C25H27N5O2S (461.58): C, 65.05; H, 5.90; N, 15.17; S, 6.95. Found: C, 64.91; H, 5.76; N, 15.32; S, 7.07.

(3aS,8bR)-2-amino-9-benzyl-4-oxo-11-((E)-pentylideneamino)-10-thioxo-4H-3a,8b-(epiminomethanoimino)indeno[1,2-b]furan-3-carbonitrile (5 g)

Yield: 0.347 g (76%); colorless crystals (EtOH); mp 210–212 °C.

IR (KBr): 3426–3339 (NH2), 2956–2866 (Ali-CH), 2194 (CN), 1725 (CO), 1651 (C═N), 1580 (Ar–C═C), 1353, 991 (C═S and C–N str.), 1076 (C–O–C) cm−1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 0.93–0.96 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 7.61 Hz,), 1.44–1.46 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.60–1.62 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.42–2.44 (m, 2H, CH2), 5.20 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 7.09–7.21 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.75–7.83 (m, 5H, Ar–H and CH═N), 7.91–7.96 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 8.30–8.35 (br, 2H, NH2).

13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δc = 13.45 (CH3), 21.72 (CH2), 27.35 (CH2), 32.03 (CH2), 47.83 (CH2Ph), 49.21 (furan-C-3), 80.70 (furan-C-4), 104.87 (furan-C-5), 116.93 (CN), 125.34, 126.04, 127.10, 128.06, 132.65, 133.34, 135.66 (Ar–CH), 136.34, 137.28, 141.29 (Ar–C), 157.22 (CH═N), 167.52 (furan-C-2), 180.05 (C═S), 189.96 (indeno-CO).

MS: m/z (%) = 457 (M·+, 69), 308 (23), 153 (100).

Anal. Calcd. for C25H23N5O2S (457.55): C, 65.63; H, 5.07; N, 15.31; S, 7.01. Found: C, 65.78; H, 4.91; N, 15.19; S, 6.94.

4.1.3. Single crystal X-ray structure determination of 5b

The single-crystal X-ray diffraction study was carried out on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer with Photon100 detector at 123(2) K using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å. Direct Methods (SHELXS-97) [71] were used for structure solution and refinement was carried out using SHELXL-2014 (full-matrix least-squares on F2) [72]. Hydrogen atoms were refined using a riding model (H(N) free,). A semi-empirical absorption correction was applied. The hex-2-en-1-ylidene substituent is disordered.

Compound 5b

C24H20N6O2S, Mr = 456.52 g mol−1, colourless blocks, size 0.22 × 0.08 × 0.04 mm, triclinic, space group P-1, a = 10.3144 (4) Ǻ, b = 10.3654 (4) Ǻ, c = 11.3719 (6) Ǻ, α = 68.809 (2)°, β = 80.169 (2)°, γ = 80.674 (2) °, V = 1110.26 (8) Ǻ3, Z = 2, Dcalcd = 1.336 Mg m−3, F (0 0 0) = 476, μ = 1.58 mm−1, Τ = 123 K, 13297 measured reflections (2θmax = 144.0°), 4312 independent reflections [Rint = 0.025], 297 parameters, 115 restraints, R1 [for 4002 › 2σ (I)] = 0.073, wR2 (for all data) = 0.211, S = 1.03, largest diff. peak and hole = 1.64 e Ǻ−3/−1.07 e Ǻ−3.

CCDC 1875475 (5b) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

4.2. Biology

4.2.1. Sixty cancer cell lines screening at the NCI

The methodology of the NCI anticancer screening has been described in detail at (http://www.dtp.nci.nih.gov). Briefly, the anticancer assay was performed at approximately 60 human cancer cell lines panel derived from nine different tumor types, in accordance with the protocol of the Drug Evaluation Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. The tested anilides were added to the culture at a single concentration (10−5 M) and the cultures were incubated for 48 h. End point determinations were made with a protein binding dye, SRB. Results for each tested compound were reported as the percent of tumor growth of the treated cells in comparison with the untreated control cells. The percentage growth was evaluated spectrophotometrically versus controls not treated with test agents.

4.2.2. DNA interaction experiments

DNA preparation

CT-DNA or Deoxyribonucleic acid sodium salt from calf thymus (Type I, fibers) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and solubilized in 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7), sonicated for 30 min then kept in an orbital shaker for 24 h (at 4 °C) before filtration through 0.45 μm filter. Final molar concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance of the solution at λ = 260 nm, using ε(CT-DNA) = 6600 mmol−1 cm−2.

Absorption spectral studies

The UV/vis spectra were obtained on Varian Cary 50 Bio spectrometer using quartz cuvettes (1 cm). The experiments were performed by titrating a fixed concentration of each compound (20 μM) with different concentrations of CT-DNA. The reaction was performed in 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7) containing 1% DMSO. The spectral changes upon continuous DNA titration were recorded and employed to calculate the binding constant (Ka) of each tested compound using both the Scatchard equation and the neighbor exclusion model (Eq (1)) [42,43], where Cf is the concentration of the free compound (probe), r is the ratio of the concentration of bound drug Cb to the total binding sites [DNA] and n is the binding density. All data were treated using KalediaGraph software.

rCf=Ka(1nr)[(1nr)[1(nr)r]]nr (1)
The Thermal Denaturation Studies

Thermal melting studies of CT-DNA were performed by following the absorption change at 260 nm as a function of temperature change using Cary 4000 UV–Vis. The Absorbance was recorded over a temperature range of 30–90 °C with a ramp rate of 0.5 °C min−1 in 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7) containing 1% 1,4-Dioxane. The melting temperature (Tm) was determined from the derivative plot (dA260/dT vs T) of the melting plot. ΔTm Values were calculated by subtracting Tm of the free CT-DNA from the Tm of the CT-DNA-Drug complex.

Viscosity Studies

The viscosity of 300 μM of the CT-DNA at pH = 7, (buffer 50 mM sodium cacodylate containing 10% 1,4-Dioxane) alone or in combination with different doses of each tested compounds (50, 100, 200 and 300 μM) were estimated in a final volume of 3 mL using the Ostwald viscometer (at 22 °C). Results were plotted as (η/η0)1/3 versus the ratio of the concentration of each compound to CTDNA (r), where η0 is the viscosity of CT-DNA alone while η is the viscosity of CT-DNA in the presence of each tested compound. Viscosity values were estimated from the observed flow time of the solution containing CT-DNA subtracted from the flow time of the used buffer (buffer 50 mM sodium cacodylate containing 10% 1,4-Dioxane) (t0), η = (t − t0).

Circular dichroism studies

The possible conformational alteration of CT-DNA due to the interaction with compounds 5c, 5d and 5f was investigated using the circular dichroism. The circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopic studies were performed using Jasco J-810 circular dichroism spectropolarimeter at 25 °C. CD spectra of the CT-DNA at a concentration of 50 μM were recorded at pH = 7, (buffer 50 mM sodium cacodylate containing 0.4% 1,4-Dioxane) in absence and presence of 20 μM of each tested compound.

Fluorescence dye displacement assay

The assay was performed using the Victor3 V Model 1420 plate reader from PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA). Each Dye-DNA complex were formed by mixing 40 μM CT-DNA with 2 μM Ethidium Bromide, 2 μM thiazole orange, 2 μM Hoechst 33258 or 6 μM DAPI in a buffer containing 50 mM sodium cacodylate and 2.5–5% 1,4-Dioxane, (pH 7). Stock solutions of different doses of the tested compounds were prepared in the same buffer and added into the dye-DNA solution. Fluorescence emission was recorded at room temperature with a 1 cm light-path quartz cuvette and 10 nm slit width for both excitation and emission. The EB–DNA mixture was excited at 515 nm, and the emission was recorded at 590 nm. Similarly, excitation wavelengths were 504, 345, and 344 nm for thiazole orange, DAPI and Hoechst 33258, respectively. The emission was recorded at 530 nm for thiazole orange and at 460 nm for DAPI and H33258.

4.2.3. Anticancer activity assays

Cell culture

A549 cell line was cultured in RPMI (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)-US grade (Invitrogen), 1X Glutamax (Invitrogen), 100 UmL-1 penicillin (Sigma), and 100 gmL-1 streptomycin (Sigma). Cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. For Western blotting, cells were seeded at 800,000–1000,000 cells per well in a 6-well plate and incubated for 24 hrs before treatment with DMSO or different doses of each compound for 12 or 24 h.

Western Blotting

After drug incubation, cell lysates were prepared in M−PER™ Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo-Fisher) after washing in PBS (Invitrogen). The lysates were cleared by centrifugation, and Bradford analysis (Bio-Rad) was used to measure the protein concentration. Lysates containing 60 μg of total protein were fractionated on a 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad) and transferred to Hybond-P PVDF Membrane (GE Healthcare). Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C using 1:1000 antiphospho-H2AX (Ser-139), rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology); 1:1000 anti-H2AX (D17A3) rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology); 1:1000 anti-PARP (46D11) rabbit mAB (Cell Signaling Technology); 1:1000 anti-cleaved-PARP (D214) rabbit polyclonal Abs (Cell Signaling Technology); ½000 anti-Vinculin (E1E9V) XP rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology) and 1:5000 antiactin, clone 4 mouse mAb (Millipore). Either anti-rabbit (Bio-Rad) or anti-mouse (Cell Signaling Technology) horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and Western Bright ECL Western Blotting Reagents (Advansta) were used to develop the blots. All experiments were reproduced in independent experiments. All experiments were performed two times.

Cells proliferation assays

The MTS assay (CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay from Promega) was used to detect the proliferation of cells following the manufacturer protocol. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

IncuCyte apoptosis analysis

In each well of a 96 well plate, A549 cells were seeded (2000 cells/well). Cells were allowed to adhere for 24 h before treatment. Cells were treated with different doses of each compound in the presence of constant concentration of the lncuCyte Caspase-3/7 or Annexin V reagent following the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were incubated and imaged in the lncuCyte® ZOOM microscope with a 10X objective at different time points. The number of apoptotic cells was normalized to the percentage confluency at each time point to account for cell proliferation.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the NCI for inclusion of our compounds in their screening program. Funding by The Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) grant (RP160657), USA; the National Institutes of Health (R01 GM123252), USA and The Welch Foundation (F-1390), USA to KN Dalby is also acknowledged.

Footnotes

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.02.027.

References

  • [1].Dilmac AM, Spuling E, de Meijere A, Brӓse S, Propellanes-from a chemical curiosity to “explosive” materials and natural products, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 56 (21) (2017) 5684–5718, 10.1002/anie.201603951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Rey-Carrizo M, Barniol-Xicota M, Ma C, Frigole-Vivas M, Torres E, Naesens L, Llabres S, Juarez-Jimenez J, Luque FJ, DeGrado WF, Lamb RA, Pinto LH, Vazquez S, Easily accessible polycyclic amines that inhibit the wild-type and amantadine-resistant mutants of the M2 channel of influenza A virus, J. Med. Chem 57 (13) (2014) 5738–5747, 10.1021/jm5005804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Qian-Cutrone J, Gao Q, Huang S, Klohr SE, Veitch JA, Shu Y-Z, Arthrinone A Novel fungal metabolite from Arthrinium sp. FA 1744, J. Natural Prod 57 (12) (1994) 1656–1660, 10.1021/np50114a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Rezvanian A, Alizadeh A, Powerful approach to synthesis of fused oxa-aza[3.3.3] propellanes via chemoselective sequential MCR in a single pot, Tetrahedron 68 (49) (2012) 10164–10168, 10.1016/j.tet.2012.09.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Tang YZ, Liu YH, Chen JX, Pleuromutilin and its derivatives-the lead compounds for novel antibiotics, Mini-Rev. Med. Chem 12 (1) (2012) 53–61, 10.2174/138955712798868968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Konishi M, Ohkuma H, Tsuno T, Oki T, VanDuyne GD, Clardy J, Crystal and molecular structure of dynemicin A: a novel 1,5-diyn-3-ene antitumor antibiotic, J. Am. Chem. Soc 112 (9) (1990) 3715–3716, 10.1021/ja00165a097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Chu M, Truumees I, Patel MG, Gullo VP, Puar MS, McPhail AT, Structure of Sch 49209: a novel antitumor agent from the fungus Nattrassia mangiferae, J. Organic Chem 59 (5) (1994) 1222–1223, 10.1021/jo00084a052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Tian X, Li L, Hu Y, Zhang H, Liu Y, Chen H, Ding G, Zou Z, Dichrocephones A and B, two cytotoxic sesquiterpenoids with the unique [3.3.3] propellane nucleus skeleton from Dichrocephala benthamii, RSC Adv. 3 (21) (2013) 7880–7883, 10.1039/c3ra23364b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Zhu H, Chen C, Tong Q, Li XN, Yang J, Xue Y, Luo Z, Wang J, Yao G, Zhang Y, Epicochalasines A and B: two bioactive Merocytochalasans Bearing Caged Epicoccine Dimer Units from Aspergillus flavipes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 55 (10) (2016) 3486–3490, 10.1002/anie.201511315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Zuber G, Quada JC, Hecht SM, Sequence selective cleavage of a DNA Octanucleotide by Chlorinated Bithiazoles and Bleomycins, J. Am. Chem. Soc 120 (36) (1998) 9368–9369, 10.1021/ja981937r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Bailly C, Topoisomerase I poisons and suppressors as anticancer drugs, Curr. Med. Chem 7 (1) (2000) 39–58, 10.2174/0929867003375489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Seitz O, DNA and RNA Binders. From Small Molecules to Drugs. Vols. 1 & 2. Edited by Demeunynck Martine, Bailly Christian and Wilson W. David, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 42 (41) (2003), 10.1002/anie.200385976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Hecht SM, Bleomycin: new perspectives on the mechanism of action, J. Nat. Prod 63 (1) (2000) 158–168, 10.1021/np990549f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Ghosh T, Maiya BG, Samanta A, Shukla AD, Jose DA, Kumar DK, Das A, Mixed-ligand complexes of ruthenium(II) containing new photoactive or electroactive ligands: synthesis, spectral characterization and DNA interactions, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 10 (5) (2005) 496–508, 10.1007/s00775-005-0660-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Liu FQ, Wang QX, Jiao K, Jian FF, Liu GY, Li RX, Synthesis, crystal structure, and DNA-binding properties of a new copper (II) complex containing mixed-ligands of 2,2′-bipyridine and p-methylbenzoate, Inorg. Chim. Acta 359 (5) (2006) 1524–1530, 10.1016/j.ica.2005.12.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Song H, Kaiser JT, Barton JK, Crystal structure of Delta-[Ru(bpy)(2)dppz](2)(+) bound to mismatched DNA reveals side-by-side metalloinsertion and intercalation, Nat. Chem 4 (8) (2012) 615–620, 10.1038/nchem.1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Zeglis BM, Pierre VC, Barton JK, Metallo-intercalators and metallo-insertors, Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 44 (2007) 4565–4579, 10.1039/b710949k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Ali A, Bhattacharya S, DNA binders in clinical trials and chemotherapy, Bioorg. Med. Chem 22 (16) (2014) 4506–4521, 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Blackburn GM, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain), Nucleic acids in chemistry and biology, third ed., RSC Pub, Cambridge, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Hamilton PL, Arya DP, Natural product DNA major groove binders, Nat. Prod. Rep 29 (2) (2012) 134–143, 10.1039/c1np00054c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Baraldi PG, Bovero A, Fruttarolo F, Preti D, Tabrizi MA, Pavani MG, Romagnoli R, DNA minor groove binders as potential antitumor and antimicrobial agents, Med. Res. Rev 24 (4) (2004) 475–528, 10.1002/med.20000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Alizadeh A, Bayat F, Moafi L, Zhu L-G, 5-Hydroxybenzo[g]indoles formation from oxa-aza[3.3.3]propellanes, Tetrahedron 71 (42) (2015) 8150–8154, 10.1016/j.tet.2015.08.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Alizadeh A, Rezvanian A, Zhu LG, Synthesis of heterocyclic [3.3.3]propellanes via a sequential four-component reaction, J. Org. Chem 77 (9) (2012) 4385–4390, 10.1021/jo300457m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Alizadeh A, Rezvanian A, Zhu L-G, Chemo- and Regioselective 4CR Synthesis of Oxathiaaza[3.3.3]propellanes via Sequential C-S, C–N and C–O Bond Formation in a Single Pot, Synlett 23 (17) (2012) 2526–2530, 10.1055/s-0032-1317181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Yavari I, Malekafzali A, Skoulika S, Tandem synthesis of trichloromethylated [3.3.3]propellanes from trichloroacetamidines and a ninhydrin–malononitrile adduct, Tetrahedron Lett. 55 (20) (2014) 3154–3156, 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.03.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Chen N, Xia S, Zou M, Shao X, Bridged heterocyclic neonicotinoid analogues: design, synthesis, and insecticidal activity, Res. Chem. Intermed 41 (8) (2014) 5293–5300, 10.1007/s11164-014-1631-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Zhang L-J, Yan C-G, One-pot domino reactions for synthesis of heterocyclic [3.3.3]propellanes and spiro[cyclopenta[b]pyridine-4,2′-indenes], Tetrahedron 69 (24) (2013) 4915–4921, 10.1016/j.tet.2013.04.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Hassan AA, Mohamed NK, Makhlouf MM, Bräse S, Nieger M, Synthesis of Oxaaza- and Bis-oxathiaaza[3.3.3]propellanes from Dicyanomethylene-1,3-indanedione and 2,5-Dithiobiureas, Synthesis 47 (19) (2015) 3036–3042, 10.1055/s-0034-1380447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Hassan AA, El-Shaieb KMA, Abd El-Aal AS, Bräse S, Nieger M, Synthesis of bisoxathiaaza[3.3.3]propellanes via nucleophilic addition of (1, ω-alkanediyl)bis(N′-organylthioureas) on dicyanomethylene-1,3-indanedione, ARKIVOC (Gainesville, FL, U. S.) (5) (2016) 406–415, 10.3998/ark.5550190.p009.715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Aly AA, El-Sheref EM, Bakheet MEM, Mourad MAE, Bräse S, Ibrahim MAA, Nieger M, Garvalov BK, Dalby KN, Kaoud TS, Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of fused naphthofuro[3,2-c] quinoline-6,7,12-triones and pyrano[3,2-c] quinoline-6,7,8,13-tetraones derivatives as ERK inhibitors with efficacy in BRAF-mutant melanoma, Bioorg. Chem 82 (2018) 290–305, 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.10.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Aly AA, El-Sheref EM, Bakheet MEM, Mourad MAE, Brown AB, Brase S, Nieger M, Ibrahim MAA, Synthesis of novel 1,2-bis-quinolinyl-1,4-naphthoquinones: ERK2 inhibition, cytotoxicity and molecular docking studies, Bioorg. Chem 81 (2018) 700–712, 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Hassan AA, Mohamed NK, Abd El-Haleem LE, Brase S, Nieger M, Synthesis of New Furo-Imidazo[3.3.3]propellanes, Curr. Org. Synth 13 (3) (2016) 426–431, 10.2174/1570179412666150513003813. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Hassan AA, Mohamed SK, Abdel-Latif FF, Mostafa SM, Abdel-Aziz M, Mague J, Akkurt M, A novel method for the synthesis of Furo-imidazo[3.3.3] propellanes from Thiocarbonohydrazides, Synlett 27 (03) (2015) 412–416, 10.1055/s-0035-1560828. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Gewald K, Schindler R, Cyclisierungen mit Cyanthioacetamid in Gegenwart von Schwefel, Journal für Praktische Chemie 332 (2) (1990) 223–228, 10.1002/prac.19903320213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Radeglia R, Kalinowski H-O; St. Berger; Braun S:13C-NMR-Spektroskopie. XII, 685S., 142Abb., 200 Tab., Format 15,5 × 23cm. Stuttgart-New York: Georg Thieme Verlag 1984. brosch. 98,-DM, Journal für Praktische Chemie 327(5) (1985) 878–879, 10.1002/prac.19853270523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Hassan AA, Shehata HS, Döpp D, Formation of 5-alkylidenepyrazol-4(1 <I >H < /I>)-ones and 3-amino-6-aryl-5-cyanopyridazine-4-carboxylates from arenealdehyde thiosemicarbazones and unsaturated 1,2-diesters, J. Chem. Res 2008 (12) (2008) 725–730, . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Starcevic K, Kralj M, Piantanida I, Suman L, Pavelic K, Karminski-Zamola G, Synthesis, photochemical synthesis, DNA binding and antitumor evaluation of novel cyano- and amidino-substituted derivatives of naphtho-furans, naphtho-thiophenes, thieno-benzofurans, benzo-dithiophenes and their acyclic precursors, Eur. J. Med. Chem 41 (8) (2006) 925–939, 10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Cheng-Yong Z, Xiao-Li X, Pin Y, Studies on DNA binding to metal complexes of Sal2trien, Biochemistry (Mosc) 72 (1) (2007) 37–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Lafayette EA, de Almeida SMV, Cavalcanti Santos RV, de Oliveira JF, Amorim C, da Silva RMF, Pitta M, Pitta IDR, de Moura RO, de Carvalho LB Junior, de Melo Rego MJB, de Lima M, Synthesis of novel indole derivatives as promising DNA-binding agents and evaluation of antitumor and antitopoisomerase I activities, Eur. J. Med. Chem 136 (2017) 511–522, 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Wang Q, Li W, Liu A, Zhang B, Gao F, Li S, Liao X, Binding and photocleavage of a neutral nickel(II) bis(hydrogen pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylato) complex to DNA, J. Mol. Struct 985 (2–3) (2011) 129–133, 10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.10.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Chen GJ, Qiao X, Qiao PQ, Xu GJ, Xu JY, Tian JL, Gu W, Liu X, Yan SP, Synthesis DNA binding, photo-induced DNA cleavage, cytotoxicity and apoptosis studies of copper(II) complexes, J. Inorg. Biochem 105 (2) (2011) 119–126, 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Amirbekyan K, Duchemin N, Benedetti E, Joseph R, Colon A, Markarian SA, Bethge L, Vonhoff S, Klussmann S, Cossy J, Vasseur J-J, Arseniyadis S, Smietana M, Design, synthesis, and binding affinity evaluation of Hoechst 33258 derivatives for the development of sequence-specific DNA-based asymmetric catalysts, ACS Catal. 6 (5) (2016) 3096–3105, 10.1021/acscatal.6b00495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Duff MR, Mudhivarthi VK, Kumar CV, Rational design of anthracene-based DNA binders, J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (6) (2009) 1710–1721, 10.1021/jp807164f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Jana B, Senapati S, Ghosh D, Bose D, Chattopadhyay N, Spectroscopic exploration of mode of binding of ctDNA with 3-hydroxyflavone: a contrast to the mode of binding with flavonoids having additional hydroxyl groups, J. Phys. Chem. B 116 (1) (2012) 639–645, 10.1021/jp2094824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Kumar CV, Turner RS, Asuncion EH, Groove binding of a styrylcyanine dye to the DNA double helix: the salt effect, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 74 (2) (1993) 231–238 [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Ma L, Wang J, Zhang Y, Probing the Characterization of the Interaction of Aflatoxins B1 and G1 with Calf Thymus DNA In Vitro, Toxins (Basel) 9(7) (2017), 10.3390/toxins9070209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Sarwar T, Rehman SU, Husain MA, Ishqi HM, Tabish M, Interaction of coumarin with calf thymus DNA: deciphering the mode of binding by in vitro studies, Int. J. Biol. Macromol 73 (2015) 9–16, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Saswati A, Chakraborty SP, Dash AK, Panda R, Acharyya A, Biswas S, Mukhopadhyay SK, Bhutia A, Crochet YP, Patil M, Nethaji R, Dinda, Synthesis, X-ray structure and in vitro cytotoxicity studies of Cu(I/II) complexes of thiosemicarbazone: special emphasis on their interactions with DNA, Dalton Trans. 44 (13) (2015) 6140–6157, 10.1039/c4dt03764b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Raj Kumar R, Mohamed Subarkhan MK, Ramesh R, Synthesis and structure of nickel(ii) thiocarboxamide complexes: effect of ligand substitutions on DNA/protein binding, antioxidant and cytotoxicity, RSC Adv. 5 (58) (2015) 46760–46773, 10.1039/c5ra06112a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Shahabadi N, Mohammadi S, Synthesis characterization and DNA interaction studies of a new Zn(II) complex containing different dinitrogen aromatic ligands, Bioinorg. Chem. Appl 2012 (2012) 571913,, 10.1155/2012/571913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Dedon PC, Determination of binding mode: intercalation, Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem Chapter 8 (2001) Unit 8 1, 10.1002/0471142700.nc0801s00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Wei Y, Guo L-H, Binding interaction between polycyclic aromatic compounds and DNA by fluorescence displacement method, Environ. Toxicol. Chem 28 (5) (2009) 940–945 https://doi.org/doi: 10.1897/08-394.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Kapicak L, Gabbay EJ, Effect of aromatic cations on the tertiary structure of deoxyribonucleic acid, J. Am. Chem. Soc 97 (2) (1975) 403–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Chen L-M, Liu J, Chen J-C, Shi S, Tan C-P, Zheng K-C, Ji L-N, Experimental and theoretical studies on the DNA-binding and spectral properties of water-soluble complex [Ru(MeIm)4(dpq)]2+, J. Mol. Struct 881 (1) (2008) 156–166 [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Holmgaard List N, Knoops J, Rubio-Magnieto J, Ide J, Beljonne D, Norman P, Surin M, Linares M, Origin of DNA-induced circular dichroism in a minor-groove Binder, J. Am. Chem. Soc 139 (42) (2017) 14947–14953, 10.1021/jacs.7b05994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Ali MS, Farah MA, Al-Lohedan HA, Al-Anazi KM, Comprehensive exploration of the anticancer activities of procaine and its binding with calf thymus DNA: a multi spectroscopic and molecular modelling study, RSC Adv. 8 (17) (2018) 9083–9093, 10.1039/c7ra13647a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Xuan S, Meng Z, Wu X, Wong J-R, Devi G, Yeow EKL, Shao F, Efficient DNAmediated electron transport in ionic liquids, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng 4 (12) (2016) 6703–6711, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Kikuta E, Aoki S, Kimura E, New potent agents binding to a poly(dT) sequence in double-stranded DNA: bis(Zn(2+)-cyclen) and tris(Zn(2+)-cyclen) complexes, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 7 (4–5) (2002) 473–482, 10.1007/s00775-001-0322-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Vardevanyan PO, Antonyan AP, Parsadanyan MA, Shahinyan MA, Hambardzumyan LA, Torosyan MA, Karapetian AT, The influence of GC/AT composition on intercalating and semi-intercalating binding of ethidium bromide to DNA, J. Braz. Chem. Soc 23 (2012) 2016–2020. [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Varadarajan S, Shah D, Dande P, Settles S, Chen FX, Fronza G, Gold B, DNA damage and cytotoxicity induced by minor groove binding methyl sulfonate esters, Biochemistry 42 (48) (2003) 14318–14327, 10.1021/bi0353272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Bales BC, Kodama T, Weledji YN, Pitie M, Meunier B, Greenberg MM, Mechanistic studies on DNA damage by minor groove binding copper-phenanthroline conjugates, Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (16) (2005) 5371–5379, 10.1093/nar/gki856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Ashraf R, Hamidullah M, Hasanain P, Pandey M, Maheshwari LR, Singh MQ, Siddiqui R, Konwar KV, Sarkar Sashidhara J, Coumarin-chalcone hybrid instigates DNA damage by minor groove binding and stabilizes p53 through post translational modifications, Sci. Rep 7 (2017) 45287, 10.1038/srep45287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Saini KS, Hamidullah R Ashraf, Mandalapu D, Das S, Siddiqui MQ, Dwivedi S, Sarkar J, Sharma VL, Konwar R, New orally active DNA minor groove binding small molecule CT-1 acts against breast cancer by targeting tumor DNA damage leading to p53-dependent apoptosis, Mol. Carcinog 56 (4) (2017) 1266–1280, 10.1002/mc.22588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Roos WP, Kaina B, DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis, Trends Mol. Med 12 (9) (2006) 440–450, 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Zhang X, Zhang SC, Sun D, Hu J, Wali A, Pass H, Fernandez-Madrid F, Harbut MR, Tang N, New insight into the molecular mechanisms of the biological effects of DNA minor groove binders, PLoS One 6 (10) (2011) e25822,, 10.1371/journal.pone.0025822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Hegde M, Sharath Kumar KS, Thomas E, Ananda H, Raghavan SC, Rangappa KS, A novel benzimidazole derivative binds to the DNA minor groove and induces apoptosis in leukemic cells, RSC Adv. 5 (113) (2015) 93194–93208, 10.1039/c5ra16605e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Wong DJ, Robert L, Atefi MS, Lassen A, Avarappatt G, Cerniglia M, Avramis E, Tsoi J, Foulad D, Graeber TG, Comin-Anduix B, Samatar A, Lo RS, Ribas A, Antitumor activity of the ERK inhibitor SCH772984 [corrected] against BRAF mutant, NRAS mutant and wild-type melanoma, Mol. Cancer 13 (2014) 194, 10.1186/1476-4598-13-194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Hassan AA, Aly AA, El-Shaieb KMA, Bedair TMI, Bräse S, Brown AB, Synthesis of Thiazolidin-4-ones from Substituted (Ylidene) hydrazinecarbothioamides and Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate, J. Heterocycl. Chem 51 (3) (2014) 674–682, 10.1002/jhet.1642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Hassan AA, Nour El-Din AM, Abdel-Latif FF, Mostafa SM, Bräse S, Formation of dioxospiroindene[1,3]thiazine and thioxoindeno[2,1-d]imidazolone derivatives from alkenylidene-hydrazinecarbothioamides, Chem. Papers 66 (4) (2012) 295–303, 10.2478/s11696-012-0145-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Hassan AA, Mohamed NK, Makhlouf MM, Bräse S, Nieger M, Hopf H, (Hex-2-en-ylidene)-N-Substituted Hydrazinecarbothioamides and 2,3-Dichloro-1,4-naphthoquinone: Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions and Synthesis of Naphtho[2,3-f] [1,3,4]thiadiazepines and Naphtho[2,3-d]thiazoles, Synthesis 48 (18) (2016) 3134–3140, 10.1055/s-0035-1562133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Sheldrick GM, A short history of SHELX, Acta Crystallogr. A 64 (Pt 1) (2008) 112–122, 10.1107/S0108767307043930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Sheldrick GM, SHELXT – integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination, Acta Crystallogr. A Found Adv 71 (Pt 1) (2015) 3–8, 10.1107/S2053273314026370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary

RESOURCES