Abstract
Background: Fc-mannose-binding lectin (FcMBL), an engineered version of the blood opsonin MBL that contains the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and flexible neck regions of MBL fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1, has been shown to bind various microbes and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). FcMBL has also been used to create an enzyme-linked lectin sorbent assay (ELLecSA) for use as a rapid (<1 h) diagnostic of bloodstream infections.
Methods: Here we extended this work by using the ELLecSA to test FcMBL’s ability to bind to more than 190 different isolates from over 95 different pathogen species.
Results: FcMBL bound to 85% of the isolates and 97 of the 112 (87%) different pathogen species tested, including bacteria, fungi, viral antigens and parasites. FcMBL also bound to PAMPs including, lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, as well as lipoarabinomannan (LAM) and phosphatidylinositol mannoside 6 (PIM 6) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Conclusions: The efficiency of pathogen detection and variation between binding of different strains of the same species could be improved by treating the bacteria with antibiotics, or mechanical disruption using a bead mill, prior to FcMBL capture to reveal previously concealed binding sites within the bacterial cell wall. As FcMBL can bind to pathogens and PAMPs in urine as well as blood, its broad-binding capability could be leveraged to develop a variety of clinically relevant technologies, including infectious disease diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines.
Keywords: Mannose-binding lectin, Lipopolysaccharide, Lipoteichoic acid, Biomarker, Bacteria, Antibiotics, Diagnostic
Introduction
Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is a key host-defense protein associated with the lectin pathway of the innate immune system 1, and deficiency of MBL can lead to increased susceptibility to a wide-spectrum of infectious diseases 2– 4. MBL functions as a calcium-dependent, pattern-recognition opsonin that binds a range of carbohydrate molecules associated with the surfaces or cell walls of many different types of pathogens 5. Collectively these microbial surface carbohydrate molecules, including for example, lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA), are referred to as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) 6, 7. MBL has the intrinsic ability to distinguish foreign PAMPs from self, subsequently activating the complement system and providing protection via antibody-dependent and independent mechanisms 8, 9.
Due to the evolutionarily conserved recognition carbohydrate moieties of PAMPs, MBL is a broad-spectrum opsonin that can bind over 90 different species of pathogens, including Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites 10– 14. MBL binding to these various pathogens has been demonstrated by means of flow cytometry 14, 15, radio-immunoassay 13, 16, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) 13, 17, immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 18, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-induced MBL activation and bystander lysis of chicken erythrocytes 19. However, many discrepancies in MBL binding have been described, depending on the method used. For example, use of flow cytometry revealed little to no MBL binding to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while others have reported good binding of MBL to Pseudomonas aeruginosa using a hemolytic assay 15, 19 .
We set out to address these conflicting results by leveraging the recent development of an engineered version of MBL that contains the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and flexible neck regions of MBL fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1, which is known as FcMBL 20. The engineered FcMBL lacks the regions of the native molecule that interact with MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs) that activate complement and promote blood coagulation, and thus, it can be used to capture PAMPs from complex biological fluids, such as blood and urine, without activating effector functions of complement, coagulation, and phagocytosis. We have previously used FcMBL in extracorporeal therapies, such as hemofiltration, and in diagnostics to capture and detect Staphylococcus aureus from osteoarticular and synovial fluids of infected patients 20– 22. In the present study, we used a previously described sandwich enzyme-linked lectin sorbent assay (ELLecSA) in which both live and fragmented pathogens (PAMPs) are captured using FcMBL conjugated to magnetic beads and then detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled MBL 23. This ELLecSA has demonstrated FcMBL binding to 85% (47 of 55) of pathogen species previously tested, and enabled rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections by capturing and detecting PAMPs in whole blood from human patients 23. Here we extend this testing to include 69 isolates from 57 more pathogen species using the ELLecSA. In total, we measure direct binding of FcMBL to over 190 pathogen isolates from over 95 different pathogen species, including bacteria, fungi, viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial cell wall molecules. As a result of this more extensive analysis, we demonstrate that FcMBL detection increases to 85% of the isolates and 87% (97 out of 112) of the pathogen species tested. Furthermore, we show that antibiotic treatment or mechanical disruption of the bacterial pathogens exposes previously concealed FcMBL binding sites on cell walls, thereby increasing the efficiency of pathogen detection and reducing variation between binding of different strains of the same species. We also show that FcMBL can detect PAMPs in urine as well as blood, making this potential diagnostic technology highly synergistic with standard of care antibiotic therapy.
Results
FcMBL binding to bacteria
We first set out to determine the range of pathogens that FcMBL can capture by screening multiple species of bacteria, fungi, viral antigens, and parasites using the ELLecSA detection technology. In the FcMBL ELLecSA, pathogen materials in experimental samples are captured with FcMBL immobilized on superparamagnetic beads (1 µm diameter), magnetically separated, washed, detected with human MBL linked to horseradish peroxidase (HRP), magnetically separated again, washed, and then tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate is added to measure the amount of pathogen material bound ( Figure 1A). Results were quantified by interpolating against an internal standard curve generated using yeast mannan in buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, 5 mM CaCl 2, pH 7.4 (TBST 5 mM CaCl 2)] ( Figure 1B). In addition, we show that while the curve sensitivity is reduced when mannan is spiked into whole human blood, the limit of detection remained similar (1 ng/ml) as it does in buffer ( Figure 1B).
Figure 1. FcMBL ELLecSA.
( A) Diagrammatic representation of the FcMBL ELLecSA methodology. Live and fragmented bacteria are captured by FcMBL, which has been coated on superparamagnetic beads via an N-terminal aminooxy-biotin on the Fc to allow oriented attachment to streptavidin (FcMBL Bead). FcMBL beads with captured bacteria are then magnetically separated and detected using recombinant human MBL linked to horseradish peroxidase (Human MBL-HRP). Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate is added to quantify captured bacteria and results are read at OD 450nm. ( B) Mannan standard curve showing FcMBL binding to mannan in buffer and spiked into whole human blood (<24 h from draw), measured at optical density 450 nm. The mannan standard curve in buffer serves as an internal assay control, and is used to determine FcMBL binding to pathogen material in units of PAMPs/ml (where 1 ng/ml of mannan bound by FcMBL is equivalent to 1 PAMP unit. PAMP units are then multiplied by the dilution factor of the sample volume to give PAMPs/ml).
Initially our focus was on screening bacteria and as such we compiled a comprehensive list of clinically relevant bacterial pathogens ( Table 1) 23. When we screened 82 different species of bacteria to compare FcMBL binding to live versus fragmented cells, we found that FcMBL detected 59 out of 82 live microbes (72%) and that more could be detected (70 out of 82; 85%) after they were fragmented by treating with antibiotics, or mechanically disrupted using zirconia/silica beads in a mixer mill ( Table 1) 23. The antibiotics we used in this study were clinical grade cefepime, ceftriaxone, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, and vancomycin, to provide enough coverage to target this diverse range of bacteria. We dosed each bacterial class with a single appropriate antibiotic dose (≤1 mg/ml) to obtain acute fragmentation within 4 hours.
Table 1. FcMBL binding profile of bacteria, fungi, viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial antigens.
Multiple species of bacteria, including multiple isolates (number of isolates), were screened by FcMBL ELLecSA to determine FcMBL binding. Total number detected of both live and fragmented bacterial isolates is shown. Fungi were screened and total number detected for live isolates shown. Purified or inactivated viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial antigens were tested directly in TBST 5 mM CaCl 2 buffer, and number detected shown. Test samples were performed in duplicate. NT, not tested.
| Bacteria | Fungi | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | # of
Isolates |
Live
Detected |
Fragmented
Detected |
Genus | Species | # of
Isolates |
Live
Detected |
| Acinetobacter | calcoaceticus | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aureobasidium | pullulans | 1 | 1 |
| Acinetobacter | lwoffii | 1 | 0 | 1 | Candida | auris | 1 | 1 |
| Achromobacter | xylosoxidans | 1 | 1 | 1 | Penicillium | crustosum | 1 | 1 |
| Actinobacillus | pleuropneumoniae | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Aerococcus | viridans | 1 | 1 | 1 | Viral Antigens | |||
| Aeromonas | hydrophila | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Aeromonas | veronii | 1 | 1 | 1 | Species | Antigen | # of
Isolates |
Detected |
| Alcaligenes | faecalis | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Bacillus | anthracis | 1 | 1 | 1 | Chikungunya | E1 | 1 | 0 |
| Bacillus | cereus | 1 | 1 | 1 | Cytomegalovirus | particles | 1 | 1 |
| Bacillus | thurigiensis | 1 | 0 | 1 | Dengue | Serotype 1 VLP | 1 | 1 |
| Bartonella | henselae | 1 | 1 | 1 | Ebola | GP1 | 1 | 1 |
| Cardiobacterium | hominis | 1 | 1 | 1 | HIV | gp120 | 1 | 1 |
| Corynebacterium | amycolatum | 1 | 1 | 1 | Influenza H1N1 | hemagglutinin | 1 | 1 |
| Corynebacterium | minutissmum | 1 | 1 | 1 | Influenza H1N1 | neuraminidase | 1 | 1 |
| Corynebacterium | pseudodiphtheriticum | 1 | 1 | 1 | Respiratory Syncytial | glycoprotein g | 1 | 1 |
| Corynebacterium | striatum | 1 | 1 | 1 | Tick-borne Encephalitis | NS1 | 1 | 0 |
| Citrobacter | koseri | 1 | 0 | 1 | Zika | lysate | 1 | 1 |
| Eikenella | corrodens | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Enterococcus | avium | 1 | 1 | 1 | Parasites | |||
| Enterococcus | casseliflavus | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Escherichia | coli | 2 | 0 | 2 | Genus | Species | # of
Isolates |
Detected |
| Kingella | kingae | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Lactococcus | lactis | 1 | 1 | 1 | Plasmodium | falciparum | 1 | 0 |
| Laribacter | hongkongensis | 1 | 1 | 1 | Trichomonas | vaginalis | 1 | 1 |
| Moraxella | catarrhalis | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Mycobacterium | bovis | 1 | NT | 1 | Bacterial Antigens | |||
| Providencia | stuartii | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pseudomonas | aeruginosa | 5 | 5 | 5 | Antigen | # of
Isolates |
Detected | |
| Pseudomonas | putida | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pseudomonas | stutzeri | 1 | 0 | 1 | Lipoarabinomannan | 1 | 1 | |
| Rothia | mucilaginosa | 1 | 0 | 1 | Lipopolysaccharide | 5 | 5 | |
| Staphylococcus | aureus (MRSA) | 1 | 1 | 1 | Lipomannan | 1 | 1 | |
| Staphylococcus | caprae | 1 | 0 | 0 | Lipoteichoic acid | 3 | 3 | |
| Staphylococcus | cohnii | 1 | 1 | 1 | Phosphatidylinositol mannoside 1,2 | 1 | 0 | |
| Staphylococcus | haemolyticus | 1 | 0 | 0 | Phosphatidylinositol mannoside 6 | 1 | 1 | |
| Staphylococcus | intermedius | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Staphylococcus | warneri | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Streptococcus | anginosus | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Streptococcus | bovis | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Streptococcus | Group B | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Streptococcus | Group C | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Streptococcus | dysgalactiae | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Streptococcus | pneumoniae | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Streptococcus | sanguinis | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Streptococcus | suis | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
To determine if inducing bacterial fragmentation via antibiotic treatment or bead milling would reduce variation in FcMBL binding between different strains of the same species, we screened 134 isolates from 21 of the 88 Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial species, including strains tested by Cartwright et al. ( Figure 2) 23. As before, FcMBL bound a greater proportion of the pathogens when fragmented (113/134 = 84%) than when live and intact (77/134 = 57%). For some bacterial species such as Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Klebsiella pneumoniae we found that mechanical disruption or antibiotic-induced fragmentation greatly increased FcMBL binding, whereas other bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and MRSA bound equally well when live and intact ( Figure 2). With the exception of Proteus mirabilis and Enterococcus faecalis, which FcMBL did not bind at all, the capture of fragmented bacteria was equal to or greater than that of live bacteria ( Figure 2).
Figure 2. FcMBL binding to bacterial isolates is equal to or enhanced upon fragmentation.
The graph is divided between Gram-negative bacterial isolates [Gram (-)] and Gram-positive bacterial isolates [Gram (+)]. Data are presented as the number of bacterial isolates bound live and fragmented within the total isolates tested for each species: A. baumannii ( n = 3), E. aerogenes ( n = 4), E. cloacae ( n = 8), E. coli ( n = 28), K. oxytoca ( n = 7), K. pneumoniae ( n = 9), P. mirabilis ( n = 4), P. aeruginosa ( n = 6), S. enteriditis ( n = 2), S. paratyphi A ( n = 2), S. typhimurium ( n = 6), S. marcescens ( n = 5), Y. pseudotuberculosis ( n = 6), E. faecalis ( n = 5), S. aureus ( n = 17), S. aureus (MRSA) ( n = 3), S. epidermidis ( n = 4), S. hominis ( n = 2), S. agalactiae ( n = 2), S. pneumoniae ( n = 9), S. viridans ( n = 2).
These findings are consistent with past studies that showed the efficiency of MBL binding to live bacteria differs between isolates from the same bacterial genus and species, possibly due to differences in encapsulation 15, 16. To illustrate that the heterogeneity of MBL binding to live isolates of the same species can be reduced by using antibiotics to disrupt previously cryptic binding sites, we used two different isolates of Escherichia coli, and two different isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. E. coli 41949 and S. pneumoniae 3 exhibited equivalent FcMBL binding whether they were live or fragmented with antibiotics (1 mg/ml cefepime or ceftriaxone, respectively, for 4 hours), whereas fragmented forms of E. coli RS218 and S. pneumoniae 19A isolates bound much more effectively to FcMBL than living forms ( Figure 3A–D). This difference was further supported visually using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in which magnetic FcMBL beads could be seen to bind both live and fragmented versions of E. coli 41949 and S. pneumoniae 3, but with E. coli RS218 and S. pneumoniae 19A, the FcMBL beads only bound to fragmented material ( Figure 3E–H). FcMBL binding increases upon fragmentation, which is correlated with LPS release measured using a limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay: equal amounts of LPS were detected for E. coli 41949 whether live or fragmented, whereas LPS levels were higher in antibiotic treated E. coli RS218 ( Figure 3I, J). These results suggest that antibiotic treatment results in exposure of previously cryptic PAMPs in the cell wall, including toxins such as LPS and LTA, which leads to greatly increased binding of FcMBL.
Figure 3. FcMBL bacterial binding efficiency can be enhanced with antibiotic treatment.
( A– D) PAMPs/ml detection by FcMBL ELLecSA of both live (10 7 CFU/ml) and fragmented bacteria using antibiotics (cefepime 1 mg/ml or ceftriaxone 1 mg/ml). ( A) E. coli 41949, ( B) S. pneumoniae 3, ( C) E. coli RS218, and ( D) S. pneumoniae 19A. ( E– H) Scanning electron microscopy images showing FcMBL bead (128 nm) capture of both live and fragmented bacteria using antibiotics (cefepime 1 mg/ml or ceftriaxone 1 mg/ml). ( E) E. coli 41949, ( F) S. pneumoniae 3, ( G) E. coli RS218, and ( H) S. pneumoniae 19A. ( I, J) LPS endotoxin measurement (LAL assay) using 10 7 CFU/ml of both live and fragmented bacteria using antibiotics (cefepime 1 mg/ml). ( I) E. coli 41949 and ( J) E. coli RS218.
In these studies, we found that 12 bacterial species, including multiple species of Enterococcus and Proteus, failed to bind to FcMBL even when treated for 4 hours with combinations of antibiotics (500 µg/ml vancomycin and 500 µg/ml amikacin for Gram-positive isolates or 500 µg/ml cefepime and 500 µg/ml amikacin for Gram-negative isolates) ( Table 1) 23. Importantly however, FcMBL was able to detect 84% (172 out of 204) of the bacterial isolates ( Figure 4), which includes 9 of the 10 pathogens responsible for most healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals in the U.S., with Enterococcus species being the one exception 24.
Figure 4. Summary of FcMBL pathogen capture.
(Left) Percent of live and fragmented Gram-positive ( n = 78) and Gram-negative ( n = 117) bacterial isolates bound by FcMBL ELLecSA. (Right) Chart showing total number of isolates tested by FcMBL ELLecSA for bacteria, fungi, viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial antigens, total number FcMBL detected, and total percent detected overall. ***p-value < 0.0001; Pearson’s chi-squared test. NS, not significant.
FcMBL binding to bacterial cell wall components
We further explored FcMBL’s ability to bind bacterial cell wall components because when bead mill or antibiotics were used to disrupt the membranes of Gram-negative isolates ( n = 117), there was a significant boost in FcMBL detection efficiency with fragmented cells (89%) versus live intact cells (58%) ( Figure 4), which is likely due to exposure of LPS that is present in high concentrations in their cell wall 25. Similarly, FcMBL also detected a greater percentage (77%) of fragmented Gram-positive isolates ( n = 78), versus live intact cells (65%) ( Figure 4). Thus, to better understand some of the major targets that FcMBL binds when bacteria are fragmented, we extended our analysis using purified samples of LPS and LTA 25, 26.
Using the ELLecSA, we screened LPS purified from Gram-negative bacteria ( Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis), as well as LTA from Gram-positive bacteria ( Enterococcus hirae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pyogenes) in TBST 5 mM CaCl 2, as well as in more clinically relevant human whole blood samples. We found that FcMBL was able to detect LPS from all 3 Gram-negative species, with S. marcescens being the best (1 ng/ml limit of detection in buffer and 3.9 ng/ml in blood) ( Figure 5A–C). FcMBL also bound to E. hirae LTA very well (15.6 ng/ml limit of detect in buffer and 62.5 ng/ml in blood) ( Figure 5D), which is consistent with past findings 27. Also consistent with past findings, we found that FcMBL binds S. aureus LTA through the carbohydrate recognition domain ( Figure 5E and Supplementary Figure 1) 28, 29. Notably, however, FcMBL also bound S. pyogenes LTA ( Figure 5F), which is in contrast to the past finding that MBL binds well to E. hirae LTA but poorly to LTA from S. pyogenes due to lack of glycosyl substituents 27, 30.
Figure 5. FcMBL ELLecSA screening of purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA).
LPS from ( A) S. marcescens, ( B) K. pneumoniae, and ( C) S. enterica serovar enteritidis, and LTA from ( D) E. hirae, ( E) S. aureus, and ( F) S. pyogenes were spiked into either TBST 5 mM CaCl 2 buffer or whole human blood at indicated concentrations.
We next tested FcMBL’s ability to bind lipoarabinomannan (LAM) and its biosynthetic precursors, phosphatidylinositol mannoside 1 & 2 and 6 (PIM 1,2 and PIM 6) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) strain H37Rv 31, 32. LAM released from metabolically replicating or degrading TB bacteria has been detected in both blood and urine 33, 34. Thus, we assessed the ability of FcMBL to capture and detect LAM, as well as PIM 1,2 and PIM 6, spiked into both of these complex biological fluids as well as buffer. Our initial screen in buffer confirmed that FcMBL can detect LAM and PIM 6 at levels down to 4 ng/ml, but it did not detect PIM 1,2 ( Figure 6A–C). FcMBL also bound to LAM in both blood and urine but its binding sensitivity was reduced as it could only detect 15.6 ng/ml and 250 ng/ml, respectively. FcMBL binding to PIM 6 exhibited a similar sensitivity in buffer, but it could only detect 62.5 ng/ml and 15.6 ng/ml in blood and urine, respectively.
Figure 6. FcMBL ELLecSA screening of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Rv glycolipids PIM 1,2, PIM 6, and LAM.
Glycolipids spiked into ( A) buffer (TBST 5mM CaCl 2), ( B) whole human blood, and ( C) urine. FcMBL detected LAM and PIM 6 at 4 ng/ml in buffer, but not PIM 1,2. Sensitivity of LAM and PIM 6 is reduced in whole human blood and urine.
FcMBL binding to fungi, parasites, viral antigens, and bacterial cell wall antigens
In addition to screening multiple bacteria, we also tested FcMBL’s ability to bind to 12 different species of fungi, 10 viral antigens, 2 species of parasites, and 6 purified bacterial cell wall antigens ( Table 1) 23. In contrast to studies with bacteria, FcMBL was found to bind 100% of live fungal cells from all 12 species and 13 isolates tested ( Figure 4). Of the two parasites tested in this preliminary analysis, only Trichomonas vaginalis was bound by FcMBL, whereas 80% of the viral antigens screened and 92% of the purified bacterial cell wall antigens were detected ( Figure 4 and Figure 7). The handful of pathogen material FcMBL did not detect included the E1 protein from Chikungunya virus, the NS1 protein from Tick-borne encephalitis virus, Plasmodium falciparum, and PIM 1,2 from TB. In total, the overall FcMBL binding profile respectively detected 85% (194 out of 229) of isolates, and 87% (97 out of 112) of the different pathogen species tested.
Figure 7. FcMBL binding to viral antigens.
FcMBL ELLecSA screening of Chikungunya E1 (3.0 µg/ml), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (10 7 PFU), Dengue serotype 1 VLP (0.36 µg/ml), Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gp120 (0.1 µg/ml), Ebola GP1 (0.2 µg/ml), Influenza H1N1 HA (0.1 µg/ml), Influenza H1N1 NA (1 µg/ml), Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) glycoprotein g (10.0 µg/ml), Tick-borne Encephalitis NS1 (5 µg/ml), and Zika lysate (0.24 µg/ml).
Discussion
MBL has been reported to bind to over 90 different pathogen species as well as PAMPs released from these microbes based on studies in which binding was assessed by means of flow cytometry, ELISA, radio-immunoassay, immunofluorescence and SEM, or hemolytic assays 12– 19; however, different results have been obtained with different methods. Here we explored the broad-spectrum binding capabilities of an engineered form of MBL, known as FcMBL, using a previously described magnetic ELLecSA detection assay to quantify binding of MBL to over 190 isolates from over 95 different pathogen species, which include bacteria, fungi, viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial cell wall antigens 23. FcMBL was previously shown to bind PAMPs released from 47 of 55 (85%) pathogen species tested, including 38 species of bacteria and 9 species of fungi 23. The FcMBL ELLecSA also was able to detect infectious PAMPs in whole blood of sepsis patients, regardless of antibiotic therapy (blood culture positive or negative) with a detection sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 89%, respectively 23. In the present study, we utilized the ELLecSA to extend this testing to include 69 isolates from 57 more pathogen species. In total, our results confirm that FcMBL binds to 85% of the isolates and 97 of the 112 species tested, which corresponds to an increased detection sensitivity of 87%.
MBL binding to different clinical bacterial isolates of the same species has previously produced conflicting results 15, 16. These same studies also described that most Gram-negative isolates (encapsulated strains) bound little or no MBL. We have reported similar results as we previously found that FcMBL only bound 38% of live clinical E. coli isolates tested; however, upon fragmentation and release of PAMPs, FcMBL detection of these same isolates increased to 92% 23. Broader examination of Gram-negative bacteria in the present study revealed a similar pattern: FcMBL only detected 68/117 (58%) of live isolates, but when these same microbes were treated with antibiotics or bead mill, the detection sensitivity significantly increased to 89% (104/117 isolates). Apparently, by treating bacteria with antibiotics or bead mill we were able to disrupt the encapsulated cell wall, exposing and presenting previously hidden PAMPs, thereby increasing binding and reducing variability between isolates within the same bacterial species. However, even with cell wall disruption, FcMBL did not bind 12 bacterial species, including multiple isolates of E. faecalis and P. mirabilis. These microbes likely lack the complex polysaccharide antigens which FcMBL and MBL bind. Alternatively, the binding sites might still be present, but if they are, they remain inaccessible due to the unique structure of their cell wall (e.g. carbohydrate conformation, sugar density or composition). Alternatively, the antibiotics we used might not be optimal for disrupting the cell walls of these bacteria.
To emphasize the ability of FcMBL to be used to detect the presence of a systemic pathogenic infection even when blood cultures are negative, we tested its ability to bind LPS and LTA that are major PAMP-associated toxins released by multiple species of bacteria. FcMBL was able to detect both LPS and LTA from all 6 bacterial species tested in both buffer and blood, although detection sensitivity was consistently higher in buffer. In addition, we explored whether FcMBL binds to the antigenic PAMPs, LAM, PIM 1,2, and PIM 6 from M. tuberculosis H37Rv because these are active virulence factors associated with TB pathogenesis, and hence, they are critically important targets for point-of-care diagnostic and vaccine applications 35– 38. We found that FcMBL can detect LAM and PIM 6, but not PIM 1,2, in buffer, urine, and blood; this difference in binding is likely due to the fact that PIM 1,2 has 4 fewer branched mannose residues than PIM 6 39.
Preliminary viral antigen detection in the ELLecSA was encouraging, demonstrating FcMBL binding to 8 of 10 (80%) species. We screened these viral antigens at a range of 0.1 µg/ml to 10 µg/ml that is within or below the range at which viral proteins are known to induce an immune response in vaccines 40– 42.
While the FcMBL ELLecSA cannot distinguish between different types of infections, we have previously shown that it can be used to rapidly (<1 h) detect the presence of blood infections in whole blood samples from patients suspected of sepsis regardless of whether or not they have positive blood cultures 23. Use of the FcMBL ELLecSA in conjunction with other tools, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and Procalcitonin (PCT), could help inform and assist the physician in deciding if there is an infection, whether hospitalization is critical, or whether antibiotics should be administered when a patient first enters a care center. In addition, we have found that we can combine the FcMBL capture of PAMPs with additional molecular diagnostic tools, such as PCR, to distinguish different pathogen types based on molecular composition of the samples 22.
In summary, FcMBL’s ability to both bind to numerous types of infectious pathogens and capture many of the cell wall PAMPs released by these microbes when treated with antibiotics in complex biological fluids, further demonstrates the potential value of using FcMBL capture for rapid detection of bloodstream infections, even when blood cultures are negative. As a result of extending our FcMBL-based ELLecSA studies to a broader range of different pathogens, we determined a higher (87%) binding efficiency than that observed in preliminary studies. We also now better understand how FcMBL interacts with different bacterial strains of the same species when mechanically disrupted or fragmented by antibiotics. To our knowledge, this is the broadest range and largest number of pathogens and PAMPs that have been shown can be detected by a single blood opsonin or lectin. The ability of FcMBL to detect cell wall fragments also synergizes well with standard of care antibiotic therapy, and it’s broad-range pathogen capture and detection can be leveraged to develop a wide range of infectious disease diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines.
Methods
Pathogen sources
Bacteria, fungi, viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial cell wall antigens were obtained from a multitude of sources which include: Abcam (Cambridge, USA), AERAS (Rockville, USA), American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, USA), Biodefense and Emerging Infections Resources (BEI Resources) (Manassas, USA), Boston Children’s Hospital (Boston, USA), Brigham and Women’s Hospital Crimson Biorepository (Boston, USA), Hospital Joseph-Ducuing (Toulouse, France), Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA), Sino Biological (Beijing, China), and The Native Antigen Company (Oxford, United Kingdom).
In addition, the following defined strains were used in this study: Streptococcus pneumoniae 3 (ATCC 6303), Streptococcus pneumoniae 19A (ATCC 700674), Escherichia coli 41949 (Multiple O antigens:H26) (Crimson Biorepository), and Escherichia coli RS218 (NMEC O18:H7) (Kindly provided by James R. Johnson from the University of Minnesota). LPS from Serratia marcescens (L6136) , Klebsiella pneumoniae (L4268), Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis (L6011), and LTA from Enterococcus hirae (L4015), Staphylococcus aureus (L2515), and Streptococcus pyogenes (L3140) were purchased through Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv components, which include lipoarabinomannan (LAM, NR-14848) and phosphatidylinositol mannoside 1,2 and 6 (PIM 1,2, NR-14846 and PIM 6, NR-14847), were obtained from BEI Resources (Manassas, USA). Parasites, Trichomonas vaginalis (TV01-1000) and Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite protein (ab73857), were purchased from The Native Antigen Company (Oxford, UK) and Abcam (Cambridge, USA), respectively. Viral antigens: Chikungunya E1 (CHIKV-E1), Dengue serotype 1 VLP (DENV1-VLP), Ebola GP1 (EBOVKW95-GP1-100), Tick-borne Encephalitis NS1 (TBEV-NS1-100), and Zika lysate (ZIKV-LYS-100) were purchased from The Native Antigen Company (Oxford, UK). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) was kindly provided by Brigham & Women’s Hospital (Boston, USA). Influenza H1N1 HA (11055-VNAB), Influenza H1N1 NA (11058-VNAHC), and Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) glycoprotein g (11070-V08B2) were purchased from Sino Biological (Beijing, China). Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gp120 (ab174070) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, USA).
Preparation of bacteria
Bacteria were subcultured in RPMI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) 10 mM glucose to a McFarland of 0.5 (equivalent to 10 8 CFU/ml) (Becton Dickinson, USA). Bacteria were grown to this logarithmic phase to ensure cell viability, and RPMI was used because it does not contain interfering MBL-binding nutrients, such as yeast extract. The culture was then split—live bacteria were kept on ice while the other half were fragmented. Fragmented bacterial PAMPs were generated using antibiotics or mechanical disruption. Antibiotic treatment included the appropriate use of one of the following: cefepime (NDC 25021-121-20), ceftriaxone (NDC 60505-6104-4), meropenem (NDC 63323-507-20), amikacin (NDC 0703-9040-03), gentamicin (NDC 63323-010-02), or vancomycin (NDC 0409-4332-49), at ≤1 mg/ml for ≥4 hours at 37°C 225 rpm. Mechanical disruption consisted of bead mill treatment at 30 Hz for 10 min using 0.1 mm zirconia/silica beads (BioSpec Products, USA) in a Mixer Mill MM 400 machine (Verder Scientific, Inc., USA). Testing by FcMBL ELLecSA was performed on titers of live bacteria at ≤10 7 CFU/ml, and on the same concentration of bacteria after fragmentation. LPS endotoxin from Gram-negative bacteria was quantified using a limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay ([Endosafe®] Charles River Laboratories, USA).
Preparation of fungi, viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial cell wall antigens
Fungi species were primarily subcultured in RPMI 10 mM glucose; however other media, such as potato dextrose broth (Teknova, USA), were used to facilitate growth. In these cases, the fungal cells were pelleted at 3,000 × g for 5 minutes at 22°C (Eppendorf 5424, USA), washed 3x in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, 5 mM CaCl 2, pH 7.4 (TBST 5 mM CaCl 2) (Boston BioProducts, USA) to remove residual growth media, and then resuspended in TBST 5 mM CaCl 2. Testing by FcMBL ELLecSA was performed on titers of live fungi at ≤10 7 CFU/ml. Purified or inactivated viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial antigens were resuspended or diluted in TBST 5 mM CaCl 2 for testing directly by FcMBL ELLecSA. Trichomonas vaginalis was screened at 0.46 µg/mL and Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite protein was screened at 50 µg/mL. Concentrations of viral antigens tested are indicated in the legend of Figure 7.
Antibodies
Anti-protein A (catalog number ab19483) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, USA).
Biological reagents
Fresh whole human blood (sodium heparin) was purchased from Research Blood Components, LLC. (Boston, USA), and normal single donor human urine (IR100007) was purchased from Innovative Research Inc. (Novi, USA).
FcMBL ELLecSA
The key metric used to quantify direct FcMBL binding to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from bacteria, fungi, viral antigens, parasites, and bacterial cell wall antigens is a 96 well ELLecSA, which has been previously published 23. The assay uses FcMBL coated superparamagnetic beads (1 µm MyOne Dynabead [Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA]) where FcMBL, biotinylated at the N termini of the Fc protein using an N-terminal amino-oxy reaction, is coupled to streptavidin beads in an oriented array ( Figure 1A). Each sample was screened using 100 µl or 200 µl of test sample added to 900 µl or 800 µl of assay solution respectively, which contains 5 µg of the FcMBL beads at 5 mg/ml and 10 mM glucose in TBST 5 mM CaCl 2 to total 1 ml (50 µl heparin is added if testing blood). PAMPs in the test sample are captured by FcMBL for 20 minutes at 22°C 950 rpm in a plate shaker (Eppendorf, USA). Using an automated magnetic-handling system (KingFisher TM Flex [not shown]) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), captured PAMPs are washed two times using TBST 5 mM CaCl 2, and detected with human MBL (Sino Biological, China) linked to horseradish peroxidase (MBL-HRP). Non-specific MBL-HRP is removed by 4 washes in TBST 5 mM CaCl 2, and PAMPs are quantified with 1-step ultra tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Finally, the reaction is quenched with 1 M sulfuric acid and results are read at the optical density 450 nm wavelength. Quantification of bound PAMPs is determined using a standard curve generated using yeast mannan (catalog number M3640, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in TBST 5 mM CaCl 2—a known target for MBL (1 ng/ml mannan = 1 PAMP unit) 43. PAMP units are multiplied back by the dilution factor of the test sample volume to give PAMPs/ml. Previously, a receiver operating characteristic comparison was performed for a small pilot sepsis patient study in which sepsis blood was analyzed versus non-infected controls to determine an optimal ELLecSA threshold of 0.45 PAMP units 23. Therefore, in this study we define and report FcMBL binding to a sample as having ≥5 PAMPs/ml. To confirm specificity of FcMBL binding, a negative control (FcMBL null) was used alongside FcMBL in the ELLecSA. FcMBL null was engineered by introducing two residue mutations, E347A and N349A, into aktFcMBL (GenBank accession: KJ710775.1) to remove functional binding of the CRD of MBL. FcMBL null was purified and used to coat beads in the same fashion as FcMBL described above for direct comparison. FcMBL null beads did not support any binding to yeast mannan, and supported less than half of binding to S. aureus compared with FcMBL, as the Fc portion of FcMBL binds S. aureus protein A 22 (Supplementary Figure 1) 29.
Statistical analysis
Data analyses on FcMBL binding to Gram-positive and Gram-negative live and fragmented bacterial isolates was performed using the statistical R language. Categorical variables are described as frequency (percentage). Comparisons between nominal dichotomous variables were performed with Pearson’s chi-square, when all contingency table cells were >5. Results were deemed as statistically significant when the null hypothesis could be rejected with >95% confidence. An unpaired two-tailed t-test was performed on FcMBL and FcMBL null binding to S. aureus using GraphPad Prism 7.0b (OS X). A p-value of < 0.05 was determined to be statistically significant. Dataset analysis is indicated in the figure legends.
Scanning electron microscopy
For visualization of live and fragmented bacteria on FcMBL beads, bacteria were captured with 128 nm FcMBL beads (Ademtech, France), spun down onto 13=-mm coverslips and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA) for 1 hour. Cover slips were incubated in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA) for 1 hour. Ascending grades of ethanol dehydrated the sample before being chemically dried with hexamethydisilazane (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA). Samples were then placed in a desiccator overnight. Dried samples were mounted on aluminum stubs, sputter-coated with a thin layer of gold particles, and imaged using a Zeiss Supra55VP microscope.
Data availability
Underlying data
Data for this study on the broad-spectrum capture of clinical pathogens using engineered Fc-mannose-binding lectin (FcMBL) enhanced by antibiotic treatment are available from OSF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GW4X7 29.
Extended data
Supplementary figure 1. FcMBL and FcMBL null binding to S. aureus. 10 6 CFU/ml live S. aureus without and with treatment of 1 µg/ml anti-protein A, detected by ELLecSA. Anti-protein A antibody blocks the Fc-mediated binding of FcMBL null but has no significant effect on FcMBL binding. **p-value < 0.01; *p-value < 0.05; unpaired two-tailed t-test; NS: not significant. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GW4X7 29.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Acknowledgments
We thank Vasanth Chandrasekhar for assistance in making the FcMBL beads, Shanda Lightbown for SEM images of S. pneumoniae 3, and Seth Kroll for image processing.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) grants N66001-11-1-4180 and W911NF-16-C-0050, a Global Health Innovation Partnership (GHIP) grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
References
- 1. Takahashi K: Mannose-binding lectin and the balance between immune protection and complication. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9(12):1179–90. 10.1586/eri.11.136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kilpatrick DC: Mannan-binding lectin: clinical significance and applications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1572(2–3):401–13. 10.1016/S0304-4165(02)00321-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Nuytinck L, Shapiro F: Mannose-binding lectin: laying the stepping stones from clinical research to personalized medicine. Per Med. 2004;1(1):35–52. 10.1517/17410541.1.1.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Eisen DP, Minchinton RM: Impact of mannose-binding lectin on susceptibility to infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(11):1496–505. 10.1086/379324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Larvie M, Shoup T, Chang W, et al. : Mannose-binding lectin binds to amyloid β protein and modulates inflammation. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:929803. 10.1155/2012/929803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mogensen TH: Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22(2):240–73. 10.1128/CMR.00046-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Saito T, Owen DM, Jiang F, et al. : Innate immunity induced by composition-dependent RIG-I recognition of hepatitis C virus RNA. Nature. 2008;454(7203):523–7. 10.1038/nature07106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kang HJ, Lee SM, Lee HH, et al. : Mannose-binding lectin without the aid of its associated serine proteases alters lipopolysaccharide-mediated cytokine/chemokine secretion from human endothelial cells. Immunology. 2007;122(3):335–42. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02644.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wallis R: Interactions between mannose-binding lectin and MASPs during complement activation by the lectin pathway. Immunobiology. 2007;212(4–5):289–99. 10.1016/j.imbio.2006.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Degn SE, Thiel S: Humoral pattern recognition and the complement system. Scand J Immunol. 2013;78(2):181–93. 10.1111/sji.12070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Fraser IP, Koziel H, Ezekowitz RA: The serum mannose-binding protein and the macrophage mannose receptor are pattern recognition molecules that link innate and adaptive immunity. Semin Immunol. 1998;10(5):363–72. 10.1006/smim.1998.0141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Dommett RM, Klein N, Turner MW: Mannose-binding lectin in innate immunity: past, present and future. Tissue Antigens. 2006;68(3):193–209. 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2006.00649.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Polotsky VY, Belisle JT, Mikusova K, et al. : Interaction of human mannose-binding protein with Mycobacterium avium. J Infect Dis. 1997;175(5):1159–68. 10.1086/520354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Townsend R, Read RC, Turner MW, et al. : Differential recognition of obligate anaerobic bacteria by human mannose-binding lectin. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001;124(2):223–8. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01549.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Neth O, Jack DL, Dodds AW, et al. : Mannose-binding lectin binds to a range of clinically relevant microorganisms and promotes complement deposition. Infect Immun. 2000;68(2):688–93. 10.1128/IAI.68.2.688-693.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. van Emmerik LC, Kuijper EJ, Fijen CA, et al. : Binding of mannan-binding protein to various bacterial pathogens of meningitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1994;97(3):411–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06103.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Saifuddin M, Hart ML, Gewurz H, et al. : Interaction of mannose-binding lectin with primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Gen Virol. 2000;81(Pt 4):949–55. 10.1099/0022-1317-81-4-949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Klabunde J, Berger J, Jensenius JC, et al. : Schistosoma mansoni: adhesion of mannan-binding lectin to surface glycoproteins of cercariae and adult worms. Exp Parasitol. 2000;95(4):231–9. 10.1006/expr.2000.4539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kuipers S, Aerts PC, van Dijk H: Differential microorganism-induced mannose-binding lectin activation. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;36(1–2):33–9. 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00032-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kang JH, Super M, Yung CW, et al. : An extracorporeal blood-cleansing device for sepsis therapy. Nat Med. 2014;20(10):1211–6. 10.1038/nm.3640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Didar TF, Cartwright MJ, Rottman M, et al. : Improved treatment of systemic blood infections using antibiotics with extracorporeal opsonin hemoadsorption. Biomaterials. 2015;67:382–92. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Bicart-See A, Rottman M, Cartwright M, et al. : Rapid Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus Pathogens from Infected Clinical Samples Using Magnetic Beads Coated with Fc-Mannose Binding Lectin. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0156287. 10.1371/journal.pone.0156287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cartwright M, Rottman M, Shapiro NI, et al. : A Broad-Spectrum Infection Diagnostic that Detects Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs) in Whole Blood. EBioMedicine. 2016;9:217–227. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. : Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care–associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(13):1198–208. 10.1056/NEJMoa1306801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Rosenfeld Y, Shai Y: Lipopolysaccharide (Endotoxin)-host defense antibacterial peptides interactions: role in bacterial resistance and prevention of sepsis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1758(9):1513–22. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sharma P, Dube D, Singh A, et al. : Structural basis of recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns and inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines by camel peptidoglycan recognition protein. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(18):16208–17. 10.1074/jbc.M111.228163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Polotsky VY, Fischer W, Ezekowitz RA, et al. : Interactions of human mannose-binding protein with lipoteichoic acids. Infect Immun. 1996;64(1):380–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ip WK, Takahashi K, Moore KJ, et al. : Mannose-binding lectin enhances Toll-like receptors 2 and 6 signaling from the phagosome. J Exp Med. 2008;205(1):169–181. 10.1084/jem.20071164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ingber D: “Broad-Spectrum Capture of Clinical Pathogens Using Engineered Fc-Mannose-Binding Lectin (FcMBL) Enhanced by Antibiotic Treatment.” OSF. 2019. 10.17605/OSF.IO/GW4X7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lynch NJ, Roscher S, Hartung T, et al. : L-ficolin specifically binds to lipoteichoic acid, a cell wall constituent of Gram-positive bacteria, and activates the lectin pathway of complement. J Immunol. 2004;172(2):1198–202. 10.4049/jimmunol.172.2.1198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Vergne I, Gilleron M, Nigou J: Manipulation of the endocytic pathway and phagocyte functions by Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoarabinomannan. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;4:187. 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Rojas RE, Thomas JJ, Gehring AJ, et al. : Phosphatidylinositol mannoside from Mycobacterium tuberculosis binds alpha5beta1 integrin (VLA-5) on CD4+ T cells and induces adhesion to fibronectin. J Immunol. 2006;177(5):2959–68. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Iskandar A, Nursiloningrum E, Arthamin MZ, et al. : The Diagnostic Value of Urine Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) Antigen in Childhood Tuberculosis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):EC32–EC35. 10.7860/JCDR/2017/20909.9542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sakamuri RM, Price DN, Lee M, et al. : Association of lipoarabinomannan with high density lipoprotein in blood: implications for diagnostics. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2013;93(3):301–7. 10.1016/j.tube.2013.02.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lawn SD: Point-of-care detection of lipoarabinomannan (LAM) in urine for diagnosis of HIV-associated tuberculosis: a state of the art review. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:103. 10.1186/1471-2334-12-103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Boonyarattanakalin S, Liu X, Michieletti M, et al. : Chemical synthesis of all phosphatidylinositol mannoside (PIM) glycans from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(49):16791–9. 10.1021/ja806283e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kallert S, Zenk SF, Walther P, et al. : Liposomal delivery of lipoarabinomannan triggers Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific T-cells. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2015;95(4):452–62. 10.1016/j.tube.2015.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Shin HJ, Franco LH, Nair VR, et al. : A baculovirus-conjugated mimotope vaccine targeting Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoarabinomannan. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185945. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Rodriguez ME, Loyd CM, Ding X, et al. : Mycobacterial phosphatidylinositol mannoside 6 (PIM6) up-regulates TCR-triggered HIV-1 replication in CD4+ T cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80938. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cox MM, Izikson R, Post P, et al. : Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of Flublok in the prevention of seasonal influenza in adults. Ther Adv Vaccines. 2015;3(4):97–108. 10.1177/2051013615595595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Schiller JT, Castellsagué X, Garland SM: A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30 Suppl 5:F123–F138. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cunningham AL, Lal H, Kovac M, et al. : Efficacy of the Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine in Adults 70 Years of Age or Older. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1019–1032. 10.1056/NEJMoa1603800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Super M, Thiel S, Lu J, et al. : Association of low levels of mannan-binding protein with a common defect of opsonisation. Lancet. 1989;2(8674):1236–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91849-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







