Bacteriophage ϕPsa21 is a potential biocontrol agent that infects the kiwifruit phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. ϕPsa21 is a “jumbo” phage with a genome of ∼305 kb.
ABSTRACT
Bacteriophage ϕPsa21 is a potential biocontrol agent that infects the kiwifruit phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. ϕPsa21 is a “jumbo” phage with a genome of ∼305 kb. Here, we present the genome sequence of ϕPsa21 and discuss potential genes indicative of the formation of nucleoid structures during viral replication.
ANNOUNCEMENT
The phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae was identified in 1989 by Takikawa et al. as the cause of bacterial kiwifruit cankers (1). In recent years, this pathogenic bacterium has proven damaging to kiwifruit-growing regions as a pandemic strain and has spread globally (2–9). Disease management relies on an integrated control system, including agrichemicals such as copper and antibiotics, and replacement of highly susceptible varieties with more tolerant ones. There has been a growing interest in developing phage-based biocontrol strategies against plant pathogens (10, 11). Previously, we isolated multiple bacteriophages as potential biocontrol agents against P. syringae pv. actinidiae (12). In our earlier study, phage ϕPsa21 was shown to be a Myoviridae member, with an estimated genome size of >300 kb. Tailed phages with genomes of >200 kb are considered “jumbo” phages (11, 12).
ϕPsa21 was isolated from leaf litter in a kiwifruit orchard in Te Puke, New Zealand, and propagated on P. syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 18800 as described earlier (12). DNA isolation and purification from ϕPsa21 were carried out using two steps as described previously (a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method and then further purified using a Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit) (12, 13). The library was prepared using an Illumina TruSeq DNA sample preparation kit (v2). MiSeq 150-bp paired-end sequencing was performed, and sequences were demultiplexed using the ea-utils suite of tools (14), resulting in ∼600× coverage. Assembly was achieved utilizing 1,241,686 reads and the default settings in the de novo assembler in Geneious v6.1.6; the genome was considered complete due to the coverage and since it formed a circular closed sequence, likely due to permuted ends (15). Initially, an automated annotation of the genome was produced using RAST (16), and the presence of tRNAs was determined using tRNAscan-SE (17) and ARAGORN (18). The annotation was then confirmed using DNA Master (J. G. Lawrence; http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu/computer.htm). A more detailed analysis of the coding sequences was achieved using BLAST (19) and PECAAN/HHPred. Annotation of the sequencing data revealed a 305,260-bp genome with a G+C content of 43.1%. Eight tRNAs and 420 protein-coding genes were annotated.
Jumbo phages have larger virions and are evolutionarily divergent compared with phages with a smaller genome (20). Recently, Chaikeeratisak et al. demonstrated that Pseudomonas chlororaphis phage 201ϕ2-1 assembles a nucleoid structure during viral infection (21). It has been hypothesized that the production of this structure is an adaptive mechanism evolved by phages to evade bacterial defense systems (21, 22). The development of the nucleoid structure by phage 201ϕ2-1 involves multiple proteins, including gp105, a major component of the nuclear shell, and PhuZ, which is a tubulin that positions the viral nucleus in the center of the infected cell (21, 23, 24). The nucleoid structure and the tubulin spindles are conserved in a number of closely related jumbo Pseudomonas phages (25). The ability of phages to encode these proteins is likely to indicate their potential to form nucleoids during infection. The presence of homologs of gp105 and PhuZ, combined with the large genome size and phage particle morphology, suggest inclusion in the phiKZ-like genus. Phage ϕPsa21 also shows general alignment by BLASTN with ϕKZ-like phages, namely, PhiPA3 (GenBank accession number HQ630627) aligns across 20% of the genome (maximum identity [ID], 75.7%) and Phabio (GenBank accession number MF042360) aligns across 17% of the genome (maximum ID, 73.8%). Phabio is a ϕKZ-like jumbo phage also found in New Zealand (26). Altogether, these observations place ϕPsa21in the Myoviridae family and Phikzvirus genus according to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) classification 2018b.
Jumbo phages, including ϕPsa21, encode their own RNA polymerases, and transcription occurs independently of the host (27, 28). Lavysh et al. characterized AR9, a jumbo phage that targets Bacillus subtilis, and found that transcription relies on a multisubunit phage, RNAP (28). Analysis of the ϕPsa21 genome will contribute to future insight into the unique structural attributes and replication methods of jumbo phages and their potential as biocontrol agents.
Data availability.
The genome sequence of Pseudomonas phage ϕPsa21 is available in GenBank under accession number MK552327, and the fastq files containing the 2 150-bp paired-end Illumina MiSeq reads are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA236447.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship from the Royal Society of New Zealand, awarded to P.C.F. and a University of Otago research grant. Funding for the original isolation and characterization of ϕPsa21, as reported previously (12), was provided by Zespri Group Ltd.
We thank Sonia Whiteman and Erik Rikkerink for comments on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Takikawa Y, Serizawa S, Ichikawa T, Tsuyumu S, Goto M. 1989. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae pv. nov.: the causal bacterium of canker of kiwifruit in Japan. Jpn J Phytopathol 55:437–444. doi: 10.3186/jjphytopath.55.437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ferrante P, Scortichini M. 2009. Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae as causal agent of bacterial canker of yellow kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planchon) in central Italy. J Phytopathol 157:768–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2009.01550.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Koh Y, Kim G, Jung J, Lee Y, Hur J. 2010. Outbreak of bacterial canker on Hort16A (Actinidia chinensis Planchon) caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Korea. New Zeal J Crop Hortic Sci 38:275–282. doi: 10.1080/01140671.2010.512624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vanneste JL, Poliakoff F, Audusseau C, Cornish DA, Paillard S, Rivoal C, Yu J. 2011. First report of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, the causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit in France. Plant Dis 95:1311. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-11-0195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Balestra GM, Renzi M, Mazzaglia A. 2010. First report of bacterial canker of Actinidia deliciosa caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Portugal. New Dis Rep 22:10. doi: 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2010.022.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Balestra GM, Renzi M, Mazzaglia A. 2011. First report of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae on kiwifruit plants in Spain. New Dis Rep 24:10. doi: 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2011.024.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bastas KK, Karakaya A. 2012. First report of bacterial canker of kiwifruit caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Turkey. Plant Dis 96:452. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-11-0675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ferrante P, Scortichini M. 2010. Molecular and phenotypic features of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae isolated during recent epidemics of bacterial canker on yellow kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in central Italy. Plant Pathol 59:954–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02304.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Balestra GM, Mazzaglia A, Quattrucci A, Renzi M, Rossetti A. 2009. Occurrence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Jin Tao kiwi plants in Italy. Phytopathol Mediterr 48:299–301. doi: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-2821. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frampton RA, Pitman AR, Fineran PC. 2012. Advances in bacteriophage-mediated control of plant pathogens. Int J Microbiol 2012:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2012/326452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dy RL, Rigano LA, Fineran PC. 2018. Phage-based biocontrol strategies and their application in agriculture and aquaculture. Biochem Soc Trans 46:1605–1613. doi: 10.1042/BST20180178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Frampton RA, Taylor C, Holguín Moreno AV, Visnovsky SB, Petty NK, Pitman AR, Fineran PC. 2014. Identification of bacteriophages for biocontrol of the kiwifruit canker phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:2216–2228. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Frampton R, Acedo E, Young V, Chen D, Tong B, Taylor C, Easingwood R, Pitman A, Kleffmann T, Bostina M, Fineran P. 2015. Genome, proteome and structure of a T7-like bacteriophage of the kiwifruit canker phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Viruses 7:3361–3379. doi: 10.3390/v7072776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aronesty E. 2013. Comparison of sequencing utility programs. Open Bioinforma J 7:1–8. doi: 10.2174/1875036201307010001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. TRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yuan Y, Gao M. 2017. Jumbo bacteriophages: an overview. Front Microbiol 8:403. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chaikeeratisak V, Nguyen K, Khanna K, Brilot AF, Erb ML, Coker JKC, Vavilina A, Newton GL, Buschauer R, Pogliano K, Villa E, Agard DA, Pogliano J. 2017. Assembly of a nucleus-like structure during viral replication in bacteria. Science 355:194–197. doi: 10.1126/science.aal2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ofir G, Sorek R. 2018. Contemporary phage biology: from classic models to new insights. Cell 172:1260–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kraemer JA, Erb ML, Waddling CA, Montabana EA, Zehr EA, Wang H, Nguyen K, Pham DSL, Agard DA, Pogliano J. 2012. A phage tubulin assembles dynamic filaments by an atypical mechanism to center viral DNA within the host cell. Cell 149:1488–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Forterre P, Raoult D. 2017. The transformation of a bacterium into a nucleated virocell reminds the viral eukaryogenesis hypothesis. Virologie 21:28–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chaikeeratisak V, Nguyen K, Egan ME, Erb ML, Vavilina A, Pogliano J. 2017. The phage nucleus and tubulin spindle are conserved among large Pseudomonas phages. Cell Rep 20:1563–1571. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wojtus JK, Fitch JL, Christian E, Dalefield T, Lawes JK, Kumar K, Peebles CL, Altermann E, Hendrickson HL. 2017. Complete genome sequences of three novel Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 bacteriophages, Noxifer, Phabio, and Skulduggery. Genome Announc 5:e00725-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00725-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ceyssens P-J, Minakhin L, Van den Bossche A, Yakunina M, Klimuk E, Blasdel B, De Smet J, Noben J-P, Bläsi U, Severinov K, Lavigne R. 2014. Development of giant bacteriophage ϕKZ is independent of the host transcription apparatus. J Virol 88:10501–10510. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01347-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lavysh D, Sokolova M, Minakhin L, Yakunina M, Artamonova T, Kozyavkin S, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Severinov K. 2016. The genome of AR9, a giant transducing Bacillus phage encoding two multisubunit RNA polymerases. Virology 495:185–196. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2016.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequence of Pseudomonas phage ϕPsa21 is available in GenBank under accession number MK552327, and the fastq files containing the 2 150-bp paired-end Illumina MiSeq reads are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA236447.