Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2019 Feb 22;208:481–482. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.033

Implications of religious and spiritual practices for youth at clinical high risk for psychosis

Kasia B Severaid a, K Juston Osborne a, Vijay A Mittal b
PMCID: PMC6544470  NIHMSID: NIHMS1522374  PMID: 30799216

Dear Editors,

Evidence increasingly suggests that religion has important implications for outcomes in psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia (Gearing et al., 2011). Furthermore, while research has shown that practicing aspects of religiosity (e.g., attending organized religious activities, engaging in prayer or mediation) is largely beneficial in the general population (Koenig, 2001), findings have been more nuanced in patients with schizophrenia. For example, evidence indicates that religion can serve as either a protective factor (e.g. religious affiliation may reduce negative symptoms) (Huguelet, et al., 2016) or a risk factor (e.g. may contribute to delusions) (Suhail & Ghauri, 2010) for this population. However, little is known about religious practices before the onset of illness in those at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis. The present study investigates aspects of religiosity (i.e., religious service attendance, feeling the presence of the divine, and the influence of religion on one’s approach to life) in CHR youth and healthy controls, as well as associations with symptoms and social functioning.

A total of 71 adolescent CHR and 72 HC participants were recruited; inclusion criteria included the presence of a prodromal syndrome, exclusion criteria included diagnosis of an Axis I psychotic disorder. Participants were administered the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS; Miller et al., 1999), the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID; Gibbon et al., 1997), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck et al., 1961), and the Social and Role Global Functioning Scales (GFS:S and GFS:R; Cornblatt et al., 2007). Religiosity was assessed with the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL; Koenig & Büssing, 2010), a self-report questionnaire that has been employed in psychosis samples (Pelletier-Baldelli et al., 2014) and has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Koenig & Büssing, 2010). Items were chosen to represent 1) participation in organized religion (i.e. religious service attendance), 2) private spirituality (i.e. feeling the presence of the divine), and 3) using religion to guide moral functioning (i.e. influence of religion on one’s approach to life). Participants indicated the extent an item is true for them, with higher scores reflecting increased religiosity within each domain. Independent t-tests were employed to examine group differences between HC and CHR participants on religiosity variables; Pearson correlations were used to assess relationships between religiosity variables and both symptom and outcome measures within the CHR group.

There was a strong trend for CHR participants to attend religious activities less frequently than HCs, t(141) = −1.65, p = .051. There was also a marginal trend toward CHR participants feeling the presence of the divine more than HC participants t(141) = 1.28, p = .10. No significant difference was found between the groups in the extent to which religion impacted their approach to life, t(141) = −1.71, p = .11. Within the CHR group, there were no statistically significant associations between the religiosity variables and either positive (ps > .16) or negative (ps > .10) symptoms. However, increased attendance at religious activities was associated with more severe depressive symptoms (r = .29, p = .007). Moreover, feeling the presence of the divine was positively associated with increased social functioning scores, (r = .24, p = .04), although there were no statistically significant associations between religiosity variables and role functioning (ps > .12).

In the present study, findings suggest a trend toward CHR youth attending fewer organized religious activities than healthy controls. Our results further indicate a trend for CHR participants to endorse feeling the presence of the divine more than HCs. Consistent with the aforementioned research (Koenig, 2001), our findings also suggest that religiosity is nuanced in CHR adolescents. We did not find an association between religiosity and positive or negative symptoms. However, with regard to depressive symptomatology, greater religious service attendance was associated with increased severity. Seeing as evidence suggests that higher religious involvement is associated with decreased depressive symptoms for individuals with schizophrenia (Bonelli & Koenig, 2013), this result is surprising and hints at an ambiguous relationship between religiosity and symptomology in CHR youth. One possibility for this finding is that although the CHR group attends church less, those who do are seeking to mitigate depressive symptoms, while another is that the experiences this group has in church contribute to depression. We also observed a significant relationship between feeling the presence of the divine and improved social, though not role, functioning. It is possible that during the CHR period, feeling the presence of the divine contributes to a common experience within one’s religious group, which facilitated integration rather than isolation. This study was limited by small sample size (impacting power to detect significant effects) and limited scope (specific to the United States). Future studies may benefit from multisite consortia and inclusion of other cultures. Additionally, future studies could compare and contrast social relationships both within and outside of one’s religious community. The study also only included a single time-point; it is important for future work to model how religiosity may influence clinical course.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and results of religiosity scale analysis

CHR HC Statistic p
Demographics
Age
Mean (SD) 18.63 (1.76) 18.18 (2.66) t(141) = 1.20 NS
Gender
Male 42 32
Female 29 40
Total 71 72 χ 2 (1) = 3.10 NS
Parent Education
Mean (SD) 15.31 (2.77) 15.44 (3.12) t(141) = −0.26 NS
Symptoms
Positive Symptoms
Mean (SD) 12.07 (4.56) .45 (1.04) t(141) = 20.90 p < .0001
Negative Symptoms
Mean (SD) 9.97 (6.98) .41 (.94) t(141) = 11.63 p < .0001
Depression
Mean (SD) 17.55 (11.74) 4.01 (5.02) t(141) = 2.14 p = .007
Functioning
Social Function
Mean (SD) 6.62 (1.71) 8.72 (.633) t(141) = −1.15 p = .02
Role Function
Mean (SD) 6.82 (1.69) 8.57 (.668) t(141) = −1.12 NS
Religiosity
Religious Attendance
Mean (SD) .99 (1.15) 1.32 (1.21) t(141) = −1.65 p = .051
Presence of the Divine
Mean (SD) 1.80 (1.60) 1.41 (1.70) t(141) = 1.28 p = .10
Impact of religion
Mean (SD) 1.22 (1.55) 1.59 (1.62) t(141) = −1.17 NS

Note. Positive and negative symptoms were derived from the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS). Depressive symptoms were measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Social function was measured using the Global Functioning Scale: Social (GFS:S) and Global Functioning Scale: Role (GFS:R). Religiosity was assessed with the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL).

NS= non-significant. Chi-Square and Independent t-tests were employed to examine group differences in demographic variables.

Acknowledgments

Role of funding source

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01MH094650, R21/R33MH103231 and R21MH110374 to V.A.M.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

No authors have any disclosures.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, & Erbaugh J (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonelli RM & Koenig HG (2013). Mental disorders, religion and spirituality 1990-2010: A systematic evidence-based review. Journal of Religion and Health 52, 657–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cornblatt BA, Auther AM, Niendam T, Smith CW, Zinberg, …Cannon TD (2007). Preliminary findings for two new measures of social and role functioning in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 55(3), 688–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gearing RE, Alonzo D, Smolak A, McHugh K, Harmon S, & Baldwin S (2011). Association of religion with delusions and hallucinations in the context of schizophrenia: Implications for engagement and adherence. Schizophrenia research, 126(1-3), 150–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Benjamin LS, & First MB (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II). Am Psych Pub. [Google Scholar]
  6. Huguelet P, Mohr SM, Olié E, Vidal S, Hasler R, …Perroud N (2016). Spiritual meaning in life and values in patients with severe mental disorders. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204(6), 409–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koenig HG (2001). Religion and medicine II: Religion, mental health, and related behaviors. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 31(1), 97–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koenig HG & Büssing A (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemiological studies. Religions, 7(1), 78–85. [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Woods SW, Stein MDK, Driesen N, …Davidson L (1999). Symptom Assessment in Schizophrenic Prodromal States. Psychiatric Quarterly, 70(4), 273–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pelletier-Baldelli A, Dean DJ, Lunsford-Avery JR, Watts AKS, Orr JM, Gupta T,… & Mittal VA (2014). Orbitofrontal cortex volume and intrinsic religiosity in non-clinical psychosis. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 222(3), 124–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Suhail K, & Ghauri S (2010). Phenomenology of delusions and hallucinations in schizophrenia by religious convictions. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13(3), 245–259. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES