Skip to main content
Journal of General Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of General Internal Medicine
letter
. 2019 Jan 8;34(6):828–830. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4808-9

The Views of Indian Practitioners on Deprescribing

Kumari Sweta 1, Doorva Bhat 2, Ganesan Rajalekshmi Saraswathy 1,, E Maheswari 1
PMCID: PMC6544672  PMID: 30623381

INTRODUCTION

Deprescribing, “a structured approach to drug discontinuation”1 is rapidly becoming a trend worldwide. Though the Western world has accepted and adopted this approach towards prudent and rational therapy, the concept continues to be controversial in developing countries. The decision to deprescribe any medicine is complicated by the dearth of risk-benefit data and risk of therapeutic failure or withdrawal symptoms. But deprescribing has proven to be a legitimate solution to the age-old challenges of non-adherence, polypharmacy, risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). As the responsibility of prescribing and monitoring of drug therapy falls primarily on physicians, understanding their views on deprescribing is of utmost importance. Hopefully the decision is made after weighing both the risks and benefits of deprescribing.

METHOD

This study is an observational, questionnaire-based survey of 422 registered medical practitioners within a radius of 10 km from Mathikere (Bangalore), with a minimum qualification of MBBS. Over 8 months, face-to-face interviews were conducted using a validated instrument ‘Perceptions, Attitudes and Challenges of Physicians towards Deprescribing’ (PACPD-12) (Table 1).2

Table 1.

Responses of Physicians to the Items of the Perceptions, Attitudes and Challenges of Physicians towards Deprescribing (PACPD-12) Questionnaire.

Sl. no. Question Response n (%)
1 Deprescribing is beneficial in the current clinical scenario
 Strongly agree 188 (44.5)
 Agree 115 (27.3)
 Neutral 76 (18)
 Disagree 39 (9.2)
 Strongly disagree 4 (0.9)
2 Preferred age for deprescribing
 All 240 (56.9)
 Pediatrics 66 (15.6)
 Adults 121 (28.7)
 Geriatrics 76 (18)
 None 4 (0.9)
3 Preferred drugs for deprescribing
 Benzodiazepines 146 (34.6)
 Antidepressant drugs 140 (33.2)
 Antipsychotic drugs 137 (32.5)
 Anticonvulsant drugs 137 (32.5)
 Antiplatelet drugs 129 (30.6)
 Antihypertensive drugs 127 (30.1)
 Antibiotics 118 (28)
  Opioids 112 (26.5)
 Proton pump inhibitors 84 (19.9)
 Choline esterase inhibitors 72 (17.1)
 Vitamins/supplements 70 (16.6)
 Bisphosphonates 69 (16.4)
 Statins 62 (14.7)
 Anti-arrhythmic drugs 28 (6.6)
 Antibiotics 3 (0.7)
 Steroids 2 (0.5)
 Analgesics 1 (0.2)
 Glucocorticoids, diuretics 1 (0.2)
 Based on patient profile count 1 (0.2)
 Bronchodilators and steroids 1 (0.2)
4 Reason for deprescribing
 To reduce harm to patient in view of adverse drug reaction 248 (58.8)
 Based on latest guidelines, the medication is not indicated 207 (49.1)
 To reduce cost of treatment 182 (43.1)
 To reduce pill burden 136 (32.2)
 Because medication has minimal benefit for patient in view of age and comorbidities 107 (25.4)
5 Not making deprescribing a point in daily practice
 Strongly agree 18 (4.3)
 Agree 23 (5.5)
 Neutral 66 (15.7)
 Disagree 222 (52.7)
 Strongly disagree 92 (21.9)
6 Have an approach to deprescribe a medication
 Strongly agree 88 (20.9)
 Agree 284 (67.3)
 Neutral 44 (10.4)
 Disagree 6 (1.4)
 Strongly disagree 0 (0)
7 Specific criteria used for deprescribing
 STOPP-START criteria 189 (44.8)
 AGS-Beers criteria 28 (6.6)
 No criteria used 199 (47.2)
 Others 7 (1.7)
8 Statement that best expresses view on deprescribing
 Does more good than harm 281 (66.5)
 Does neither good nor harm 58 (13.7)
 Does more harm than good 54 (12.8)
 Not sure 29 (6.9)
9 Enabling factors
 Flags by pharmacist to deprescribe medications in a patient-centered approach 239 (56.8)
 Training on de prescribing specific medications 204 (48.5)
 Strong department focus on de prescribing medication 183 (43.5)
 Having a pharmacist in your team 116 (27.6)
 Others 1 (0.2)
10 Barriers to deprescribing
 Medications usually prescribed by another doctor and the current doctor is unsure of the rationale 233 (55.2)
 Concerned about adverse events after de prescribing medication 209 (49.5)
 Damaging relationship with original doctor who prescribed medication 176 (41.7)
 Resistance from patient/family 142 (33.6)
 Lack of benefit/risk information about de prescribing 124 (29.4)
 Lack of time to consider deprescribing 110 (26.1)
 Pressurized to prescribe according to guidelines 102 (24.2)
 Patients belief that you are giving up on them 71 (16.8)
 Lack of experience 9(2.1)
11 Positivity towards deprescribing on a scale of 1–5
 1 2 (0.473)
 2 51 (12.1)
 3 93 (22)
 4 214 (50.7)
 5 62 (14.7)
12 Factors that make physicians more likely to deprescribe
 Existence of potentially inappropriate medication listed in Beers criteria 227 (53.8)
 Acute symptom possibly related to medication 218 (51.7)
 Larger number of prescription medication 194 (46)
 Advanced age 168 (39.8)
 Lower economic status of patient 166 (39.3)
 Concomitant comorbidities like hepatic/renal dysfunction that affect drug metabolism 160 (37.9)
 Existence of chronic conditions 80 (19)
 Concomitant ethanol abuse 56 (13.3)

RESULTS

The majority of Indian doctors (71.8%) agreed that deprescribing is beneficial. While 56.9% doctors chose to deprescribe in all groups of patients, benzodiazipines (34.6%), anti-depressants (33.2%), anti-psychotics (32.5%), and anti-convulsants (32.5%) were the most common candidate drugs for deprescribing. The prime reason for deprescribing (58.8%) was to reduce harm to patient, followed by latest guidelines where medication is not indicated (49.1%), reducing the cost of treatment (43.1%), and pill burden (32.2%). About 88.2% of doctors had a specific approach to deprescribing medications. The STOPP-START criterion was used by 44.8% of doctors, while 6.6% preferred Beers criteria for deprescribing. A majority of doctors (66.5%) believed deprescribing provides more benefit than harm to patients. With regard to methods that would help with depescribing, 57% felt that flags by pharmacists would be helpful; 49% believed that training on deprescribing of specific medications would also help. Among challenges, 55.2% of doctors felt that prescriptions provided by another doctor was a barrier. Concern about ADR (49.5%) and damaged relation with the original physician (41.7%) were other barriers noted. About 65.4% of doctors were confident in deprescribing. The existence of PIMs listed in Beers criteria (53.8%), acute symptoms possibly related to medication (51.7%), the large number of prescription medications (46%), and advanced age (39.8%) were the most opted factors that would make a doctor more likely to deprescribe.

DISCUSSION

Our finding that most doctors supported deprescribing was also found by Nadarajan et al. (2016).3 Our study indicated that deprescribing was preferred in all age groups, though most deprescribing studies focus on the elderly. The well-established risk of chronic benzodiazepine use, coupled with good data that they can be discontinued safely with strict monitoring, may be the reason for their being the most preferred drugs for deprescribing.4

Similar to Nadarajan et al., we also found that the top three reasons for deprescribing were to reduce harm, followed by reducing pill burden for patients and medications with minimal benefits to patients.3 About half of the physicians appreciated Beers and STOPP/START criteria as useful tools for deprescribing.

Recognizing barriers to deprescribing is helpful in finding ways to implement and overcome these obstacles. Uncertainty of the rationale behind prescription by another physician, possibly due to the rapid growth in the number of specialist and subspecialist departments that has resulted in fragmentation of patient care, was a major challenge. Minimal communication between doctors, inadequate transfer of information at care interfaces, lack of pharmacists on the clinical team, and difficulty accessing medical records also pose challenges to deprescribing among Indian physicians.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was taken from all involved participants. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.McKean M, Pillans P, Scott IA. A medication review and deprescribing method for hospitalised older patients receiving multiple medications. Int Med J. 2016;46(1):35–42. doi: 10.1111/imj.12906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bhat DB, Saraswathy GR, Sweta K. Development and validation of the perceptions, attitudes, and challenges of physicians towards deprescribing (PACPD-12) questionnaire. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19:1135–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nadarajan K, Balakrishnan T, Yee ML, Soong JL. The attitudes and beliefs of doctors towards deprescribing medications. Proc Singap Healthc. 2018;27(1):41–48. doi: 10.1177/2010105817719711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iyer S, Naganathan V, McLachlan AJ, Le Conteur DG. Medication withdrawal trials in people aged 65 years and older. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(12):1021–1031. doi: 10.2165/0002512-200825120-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of General Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of General Internal Medicine

RESOURCES