Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nanomedicine. 2018 Jun 28;14(7):2143–2153. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2018.06.005

Core-shell nanoparticles for targeted and combination antiretroviral activity in gut-homing T cells

Shijie Cao 1, Yonghou Jiang 1, Hangyu Zhang 1,2,3, Nina Kondza 1, Kim A Woodrow 1,*
PMCID: PMC6545289  NIHMSID: NIHMS978466  PMID: 29964219

Abstract

A major sanctuary site for HIV infection is the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). The α4β7 integrin gut homing receptor is a promising therapeutic target for the virus reservoir because it leads to migration of infected cells to the GALT and facilitates HIV infection. Here, we developed a core-shell nanoparticle incorporating the α4β7 monoclonal antibody (mAb) as a dual-functional ligand for selectively targeting a protease inhibitor (PI) to gut-homing T cells in the GALT while simultaneously blocking HIV infection. Our nanoparticles significantly reduced cytotoxicity of the PI and enhanced its in vitro antiviral activity in combination with α4β7 mAb. We demonstrate targeting function of our nanocarriers in a human T cell line and primary cells isolated from macaque ileum, and observed higher in vivo biodistribution to the murine small intestines where they accumulate in α4β7+ cells. Our LCNP shows the potential to co-deliver ARVs and mAbs for eradicating HIV reservoirs.

Keywords: Targeted drug delivery, lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles, α4β7 monoclonal antibody, GALT, gut-homing T cell, HIV-1

Graphic Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-978466-f0001.jpg

We developed core-shell nanoparticles incorporating the α4β7 monoclonal antibody (mAb) for selectively delivering therapeutic agents to gut-homing T cells in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), while simultaneously blocking HIV infection. We demonstrate enhanced antiretroviral activity of a protease inhibitor and α4β7 mAb combination in vitro, and show targeting function in rhesus macaque primary cells and in mice. These data demonstrate that our LCNP delivery system has the potential to co-deliver ARV drugs and mAbs to anatomical and cellular HIV reservoirs for the purpose of reducing reservoir size and potentially eradicating the virus.

Background

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) achieves complete virus suppression to undetectable levels in peripheral blood but does not lead to complete eradication of HIV infection.1 The existence of viral reservoirs is the main obstacle to HIV cure.24 The gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) is one of the largest lymphatic tissues in the human body where elevated levels of viral replication and depletion of CD4+ T cells occur in HIV-infected patients.58 HIV reservoirs can be quickly established in the GALT, where the virus becomes resistant despite long-term cART.9 Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain persistent HIV infection within the environment of the GALT. First, infected CD4+ T cells are able to traffic to the GALT from other parts of the body mediated by the α4β7 integrin gut homing receptor.10 α4β7 mediates migration by binding to the mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) expressed by endothelial cells of venules associated with the GALT.11, 12 Second, gut mucosal CD4+ lymphocytes are uniquely susceptible to HIV-1 infection,7, 13, 14 which may be explained by a higher expression of chemokine receptor CCR5 (a major coreceptor for HIV infection) and persistent activation and inflammation due to constant exposure to food and microbial antigens.13, 15 In addition, studies have shown that α4β7 can serve as a receptor for the HIV-1 envelope protein gp120 and promote the upregulation of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) to facilitate cell-to-cell spreading of HIV-1.16 Resting central memory α4β7+ CD4+ T cells have been shown to be the predominant target of SIV during acute infection.7, 17 These cells become latently infected and have the potential to traffic to and reside in the GALT because of the expression of α4β7. Lastly, concentrations of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) in lymphatic tissues, including the GALT, are lower compared to those in the peripheral blood.18 This may attribute to both early reservoir establishment and virus resistance in patients under suppressive cART.19 Thus, enhancement of ARV drug delivery to these α4β7-expressing gut-homing T cells and the GALT during the early phase of infection might be a strategy to reduce the reservoir size. Collectively, these findings suggest that the α4β7 cell marker is a promising therapeutic for HIV reservoir eradication by targeting gut-homing T cells.

Nanoparticle technology has been used with great promise in enhancing the efficacy of antiretroviral therapies.20, 21 We have previously shown that nanocarriers (NCs) formulated with physicochemically diverse ARVs delivered in combination result in higher intracellular drug concentrations, and lead to more synergistically potent inhibition of HIV-1 infection in cell and tissue cultures.22 Nanoparticles surface conjugated with targeting ligand have been used to promote the accumulation of nanoparticles to specific cells or tissues.23, 24 A variety of nanocarrier-based delivery systems have been used to target anti-HIV drugs to cellular or anatomical viral reservoirs utilizing either peptides or antibodies as the ligands.2532 Immunoliposomes (antibody-coupled liposomes) have been the most widely investigated for this purpose and offer great flexibility for conjugating with targeted ligands.3335 However, liposomes lack structural integrity and consistent storage stability.36 Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles, that consist of a polymer core and a lipid shell, combine the advantageous properties of both polymeric nanoparticles and liposomes such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, multiple drug encapsulation, high drug loading, sustained drug-release profiles, high stability, functionalizable surfaces, etc.3741

Here, we developed a nanocarrier-based delivery system using the α4β7 mAb for its dual function to target ARV drugs to gut-homing T cells and blocking HIV infection. We synthesized a core-shell nanoparticle consisting of a poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) core and a phospholipid bilayer shell coated with an outer layer of polyethylene glycol (PEG) that was used for direct conjugation of α4β7 mAbs (A4B7-LCNPs). Our LCNPs were designed such that the lipid shell, including the attached antibody, would delaminate from these nanoparticles and be available to block virus entry.42 A protease inhibitor was also encapsulated in targeted LCNPs to prevent infected cells from producing new HIV virions in the GALT. Our in vitro and ex vivo data show that tipranavir (TPV) loaded A4B7-LCNPs exhibit the dual function of targeting CD4+α4β7+ cells and anti-HIV activity. We also found that A4B7-LCNPs accumulated with α4β7+ gut T cells of the small intestine after intravenous administration to mice. These data demonstrate that our LCNP delivery system has the potential to co-deliver ARV drugs and mAbs to anatomical and cellular HIV reservoirs for the purpose of reducing reservoir size and potentially eradicating the virus.

Methods

Description of materials, preparation of LCNPs and liposomes, conjugation of α4β7 mAb to LCNPs, characterization of LCNP formulations, antibody conjugation efficiency, TPV loading analysis, lipid and antibody delaminiation and TPV release kinetics, storage stability, cytotoxicity analysis, in vitro cell binding assay, HIV-1 infection assay and antiviral activity of TPV loaded A4B7-LCNPs, ex vivo rhesus macaque ileum cell isolation and A4B7-LCNP targeting assay, in vivo mice small intestine targeting, biodistribution of targeted LCNPs in major organs, and in vivo gut-homing T cell targeting is detailed in Supplementary Materials.

Results

Synthesis and Characterization of Targeted LCNPs Loaded with Tipranavir

We modified the commonly used single-emulsion evaporation method to fabricate nanoparticles with PLGA core that facilitate incorporation of a lipid bilayer shell (Figure 1A).37, 43 We chose a lipid composition of neutral (1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, DOPC), and cationic (1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane, DOTAP) lipids at equimolar content to obtain a positive net charge for stabilizing the negative PLGA core. In addition, we incorporated 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[maleimide(polyethylene glycol)-2000] (DSPE-PEG-MAL) at 11.1% molar ratio of total lipids. The DSPE-PEG-MAL has a maleimide end group for conjugating to antibodies, and a polyethylene glycol (PEG) chain that was expected to stabilize our nanoparticles. As expected, DSPE-PEG-MAL incorporation led to a significant increase in the LCNP diameter, and altered the surface charge from positive to neutral (Table 1). This change in surface charge is also beneficial for reducing non-specific binding to cells. Both LCNPs with or without PEG were stable when stored in MilliQ water at 4 °C or 37 °C (Figure S1A, Supporting Information). However, LCNPs without PEG rapidly aggregated to sizes >1uM in PBS at 37 °C whereas PEG-coated LCNPs maintained their original size over 2 days (Figure S1B, Supporting Information). We observed aggregation of LCNPs after lyophilization during long-term storage, but this issue could be avoided by adding trehalose before freezing the LCNPs (Figure S1d, Supporting Information).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Schematic illustration of the A4B7-LCNP fabrication process using a modified single-emulsion evaporation method. (B, C) TEM images of LCNPs (B) and LCNPs surface conjugated with α4β7 mAb (A4B7-LCNPs) (C). (D) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of LCNPs conjugated with fluorescent DyLight 633 labeled α4β7 mAb measured by flow cytometry. Data represents mean ± SD, n=3.

Table 1.

Physical properties of LCNP formulations.*

Sample Size (d, nm) PDI ζ-potential (mV)
LCNP (No PEG) 142 ± 5 § 0.10 ± 0.03 29.3 ± 1.2 #
LCNP 172 ± 2 §,|| 0.08 ± 0.02 1.2 ± 2.0
A4B7-LCNP 204 ± 18 || 0.26 ± 0.10 2.1 ± 1.5
TPV/LCNP 178 ± 1 0.07 ± 0.01 4.4 ± 0.7
TPV/A4B7-LCNP 233 ± 31 0.29 ± 0.05 2.1 ± 0.3
*

Samples were diluted in Milli-Q water for size and PDI measurements and in 10 mM NaCl solution (pH = 7.0) for ζ-potential measurements. Data presents mean ± SD of at least three independent preparations. LCNP, lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles.

Lipids composition for LCNP is 4:4:1 DOPC/DOTAP/DSPE-PEG-MAL (mol/mol/mol), except for LCNP (No PEG), which omits the DSPE-PEG-MAL but retains the other lipids at the same amounts (4:4 DOPC/DOTAP).

PDI: Polydispersity index.

§

Significant difference at the 0.001 probability level.

||

Significant difference at the 0.05 probability level.

NS, nonsignificant difference between A4B7-LCNP and TPV/A4B7-LCNP groups in size, PDI and ζ-potential.

#

Significant difference between LCNP (No PEG) and any of the other groups at the 0.0001 probability level.

We used α4β7 mAb conjugated to the lipid layer shell of LCNPs for the dual-function of targeting gut-homing T cells and inhibiting HIV transmission. The antibody was conjugated to the DSPE-PEG-MAL on the surface of LCNPs and led to a modest but significant increase in diameter (Table 1). Transmission electric microscope (TEM) showed a low contrast material associated with the A4B7-LCNPs surface (Figure 1B, C), which we attributed to be the lipid layer and antibodies surrounding the PLGA core. The surface density and efficiency of antibody conjugation to LCNPs was optimized using a Dylight 633-labeled α4β7 mAb. The fluorescently-labeled antibody was conjugated to LCNPs at molar ratios from 100:1 to 2000:1 and then analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify the amount of mAb that would saturate the fluorescent signal on the LCNP. We observed that the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) saturated at a molar ratio of 1000:1 (Figure 1C). We used Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) to obtain the number concentration of LCNPs and TECAN fluorescent plate reader to analyze the conjugation efficiency, which is the percentage of mAb conjugated to LCNPs relative to the input feed amount. Based on these values, we calculated the number of mAb per LCNP (Table 2). As expected, the efficiency of mAb conjugation was reduced as the input molar ratio of mAb to LCNPs was increased. We reached a conjugation efficiency of 30.8% for the 1000:1 input molar ratio of mAb to LCNPs. With this feed ratio, we achieved the highest surface density while maximizing conjugation efficiency since we expected to deliver α4β7 mAb not only as a targeting ligand for gut T cells but also as a blocking agent to prevent HIV-1 from binding to α4β7+ cells. The loading of α4β7 mAb on LCNPs at this feed ratio was 2.16 ± 0.10 wt% (w/w, weight of mAb relative to weight of LCNPs) measured by the micro bicinchoninic aicd (BCA) assay.

Table 2.

Average content of antibody conjugated to the surface of LCNPs.

Sample* Feed ratio of mAb to LCNP (mol/mol) Conjugation efficiency Number of mAb per LCNP
A4B7-LCNP (100) 100 45% 45
A4B7-LCNP (200) 200 54% 108
A4B7-LCNP (500) 500 41.2% 206
A4B7-LCNP (1000) 1000 30.8% 308
A4B7-LCNP (2000) 2000 20.2% 405
*

A4B7-LCNP, lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles surface conjugated with α4β7 mAb at different molar ratios (100:1 ~ 2000:1, mAb to LCNP)

Conjugation efficiency =amount of mAb associated with LCNPstotal amound of mAbs added

Number of conjugated mAb per LCNP = number concentration of total mAb conjugated to LCNPnumber concentration of total LCNPs=concentration of mAb×NAm.W. of mAb ×1number concentration of LCNPs

NA: the Avogadro constant.

m.w. of mAb: the Avogadro constant.

m.w. of mAb: molecular weight of mAb, 15,000 g/mol.

A potential benefit of nanoparticles is the ability to incorporate physicochemically diverse drugs into the same delivery vehicle, which may increase drug potency through higher intracellular concentration and synergistic mechanisms.22 We employed the α4β7 mAb to target gut-homing T cells and also used it to inhibit HIV transmission by blocking the α4β7 receptor on uninfected T cells. We also decided to incorporate a protease inhibitor into the same nanoparticle with the aim of increasing drug concentrations in the GALT as well as inhibiting viral production from HIV infected gut-homing T cells. We chose tipranavir (TPV) due to its high potency, low solubility and reported toxicity.44, 45 Nanoparticle-based delivery systems have the potential to improve solubility and bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs and may also improve the safety profile of TPV.46, 47 To this end, we incorporated TPV into the LCNPs with initial drug input of 10 wt% (w/w, weight of TPV relative to weight of PLGA and lipids) which led to 8.0 ± 0.1 wt% TPV loading in LCNPs.

Encapsulation of TPV did not significantly change the size, polydispersity index (PDI) or ζ-potential of the A4B7-LCNPs (Table 1). After conjugation, we obtained a measured drug loading of 4.7 ± 0.2 wt% of TPV-loaded A4B7-LCNPs (TPV/A4B7-LCNPs), which translated to an encapsulation efficiency of 45.7 ± 3.4 %. The observed decrease in TPV loading of A4B7-LCNPs was mainly due to burst release of TPV from LCNPs during the antibody conjugation process and was consistent with the TPV release kinetics as described below. We also measured drug loading in our LCNP and conventional liposomes, and found a two-fold higher TPV loading and a 9-fold higher encapsulation efficiency in untargeted LCNPs compared to untargeted liposomes (Figure S2, Supporting Information). Our TPV/A4B7-LCNPs were stable in human serum over at least 14 days (Figure S1C, Supporting Information).

Release Kinetics of Lipids, α4β7 mAb and TPV from LCNPs

Spontaneous delamination of the lipid shell from LCNPs has been previously documented and was used in our case to deliver the α4β7 mAb.42 However, delamination could also lead to loss of targeting function. We characterized the delamination kinetics of our A4B7-LCNPs in PBS to ensure there would be sufficient antibodies remaining on the LCNPs to maintain nanoparticle targeting function over at least two days. We first characterized the delamination kinetics of DOPC and DSPE-PEG from LCNPs in PBS by using fluorescently-labeled versions of these lipids. We observed that DOPC and DSPE-PEG were stably associated with LCNPs at 4 °C but delaminated at 37°C, resulting in a 35% loss of both lipids after 48 hours (Figure S3, Supporting Information). We also directly measured Dylight 688 dye labeled α4β7 mAb delamination and observed a faster delamination in human serum than in PBS (Figure 2A). Even after delamination, we measured that 60% of the α4β7 mAb remained associated with the nanoparticles in human serum over 2 days, which is sufficient for maintaining targeting properties. In our case, delaminated antibodies that bind α4β7-expressing cells in the GALT was intended to further inhibit HIV transmission.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Delamination of DyLight 680 labeled α4β7 mAb from LCNPs in PBS at 37 °C or 4 °C, or in human serum at 37 °C over 48 hours. (B) Release kinetics of TPV from A4B7-LCNPs in PBS, PBS with 50 mg/mL BSA, or human serum at 37 °C over 48 hours. Data represents mean ± SD, n=3.

We also measured TPV release in sink conditions to inform potential drug bioavailability once dosed in vivo. Since TPV is rapidly bound to plasma proteins (>99%), including serum albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein,48 we expected that BSA could be used as a solubilizing agent in the release media. In fact, we found that 50 mg/mL BSA in PBS increased TPV solubility by nearly 2500-fold. Using in vitro sink-conditions established with 50 mg/mL BSA in PBS (pH 7.4) or human serum, we observed rapid TPV release from A4B7-LCNPs of up to 80% after 24 hours (Figure 2B). Since we observed that nanoparticles reach the gut by 6 hours following intravenous administration as described below, and 40% of TPV remained associated with our LCNP at this time. We expect that this amount of delivered TPV is sufficient for antiviral effectiveness due to its high potency. A single dose of 600 mg/kg TPV/A4B7-LCNPs every two days would deliver a daily dose of ~800 mg TPV and ~140 mg α4β7 mAb based on their loading and release profiles, which is comparable to their currently prescribed or reported dosing.49, 50

A4B7-LCNPs Decrease Cytotoxicity of TPV

Encapsulation of hydrophobic drugs in biodegradable and non-toxic nanoparticles can protect drugs from degradation, increase their circulation half-life and exhibit improved pharmacokinetics profiles thereby lowering toxicity.51 Also, targeted nanoparticle-based delivery systems can increase the physiological concentration of drugs at target sites and minimize off-target binding. Here, we compared cytotoxicity of free TPV and LCNP-encapsulated TPV in the HUT-78 human T cell line. We chose HUT-78 cells for our in vitro studies since they exhibit high α4β7 integrin expression compared with other T cells lines we tested (Figure S4A, Supporting Information), and their α4β7 expression has also been confirmed by others.52 HUT-78 cells were treated with TPV, TPV/LCNPs or TPV/A4B7-LCNPs for two days and cell viability was measured by monitoring metabolic activity. Untargeted TPV/LCNPs and targeted TPV/A4B7-LCNPs were found to be less cytotoxic as measured by their higher half-maximal cytotoxic concentrations (CC50), as 77.01 μg/mL (95% confidence interval (CI) = 66.10 to 89.73, TPV/LCNP) and 62.94 μg/mL (95% CI = 48.11 to 82.34, TPV/A4B7-LCNP) compared to that of free TPV as 32.01 μg/mL (95% CI = 30.06 to 34.07) (Figure 3A). No cytotoxicity was observed for either LCNPs or A4B7-LCNPs vehicle controls (Figure S5, Supporting Information). Such reduced cytotoxicity might be explained by sustained release of TPV from LCNP formulations compared to the acute bolus of free drug.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

LCNPs reduce cytotoxicity of TPV and enhance antiviral activity of TPV in combination with α4β7 mAb. (A) Cell viability of HUT-78 cells after incubation with TPV, TPV/LCNP or TPV/A4B7-LCNPs at different concentrations for 2 days. (B) Anti-HIV activities of TPV, α4β7 mAb, Iso mAb, a combination of free TPV and α4β7 mAb, TPV and Iso mAb, TPV/LCNPs, A4B7-LCNPs or TPV/A4B7-LCNPs. HUT-78 cells were treated with free drugs or LCNP formulations for 1 hour followed by challenge with HIV-1SF2 for 10 days. HIV-1 p24 in the supernatant was measured by ELISA and percent inhibition was calculated as a reduction of HIV-1 production relative to untreated infected cell controls. Data represents mean ± SD, n=3, *p<0.05, ** p<0.005, ***p<0.0005, n.s., not statistically significant.

Antiretroviral Activity of TPV Loaded A4B7-LCNPs In Vitro

We performed an anti-HIV-1 assay in HUT-78 cells to evaluate the activity of LCNPs after TPV encapsulation or chemical conjugation with the targeting antibody. Cells were pre-treated for one hour before being challenged with HIV-1SF2. After incubation for 10 days, culture supernatant was collected and tested for HIV-1 antigen production using HIV-1 p24 ELISA. We dosed TPV/LCNPs and TPV/A4B7-LCNPs based on total TPV loading and the free TPV, α4β7 mAb, and A4B7-LCNPs, were dosed at equivalent concentrations in all treatment groups. The potencies of TPV-LCNPs (27.9 ± 1.9% HIV-1 inhibition) or A4B7-LCNPs (34.3 ± 5.5% HIV-1 inhibition) were similar compared to free TPV (22.5 ± 4.9% HIV-1 inhibition) or α4β7 mAb (32.4 ± 6.7% HIV-1 inhibition), respectively (Figure 3B). When free TPV and α4β7 mAb are delivered in combination, they showed higher HIV-1 inhibition (45.3 ± 14.6%) but the difference was not statistically significant. However, we found that combination of TPV and α4β7 mAb in our LCNPs (TPV/A4B7-LCNP, 52.5 ± 3.8% HIV-1 inhibition) led to a significantly higher potency than either free TPV or α4β7 mAb, as well as formulated TPV/LCNP or A4B7-LCNP. We used the Bliss independent model to quantitate combined effects of TPV and α4β7 mAb, and demonstrated that they displayed synergy in our TPV/A4B7-LCNPs (Δfaxy = 0.05 > 0).

Specific Targeting of A4B7-LCNPs to CD4+α4β7+ Cells from Rhesus Macaque Ileum

Since α4β7 integrin mediates T cell migration to the GALT and also serves as a target of HIV, we were interested in investigating if our A4B7-LCNPs could specifically target these α4β7-expressing cells in the GALT. First, we used flow cytometry to analyze the binding of rhodamine B labeled A4B7-LCNPs to HUT 78 cells. Bare LCNPs without antibody or isotype IgG conjugated LCNPs (Iso-LCNPs) were used as the non-targeted control. To ensure that the rhodamine B remained conjugated with LCNPs, we performed in vitro release studies and found that less than 5% of rhodamine B released from A4B7-LCNPs over 24 hours in PBS at 37 °C. We observed that the association of A4B7-LCNPs to HUT-78 cells was significantly higher than bare LCNPs or Iso-LCNPs by comparing the MFI (Figure S4C, Supporting Information). While all LCNP formulations had nonspecific bindings to HUT-78 cells, including bare LCNPs and Iso-LCNPs, the MFI of HUT-78 cells treated with A4B7-LCNPs was two-fold higher than the cells treated with control LCNPs, which we expect is due to specific antibody-α4β7 integrin interactions. We also performed a receptor blocking study to investigate the targeting specificity of our antibody-conjugated LCNPs, and observed significant but not a full reduction of cell binding after blocking with α4β7 mAb. This can partially be explained by our observation that binding of the antibody to HUT-78 cells was reversible (Figure S4D, Supporting Information), which was indicated by a decrease in MFI over time following 30 min incubation with fluorescently-labeled α4β7 mAb. We hypothesize that this could result in a competitive binding between A4B7-LCNP and free antibody.

Next, we tested the targeting function of A4B7-LCNPs for lamina propria lymphocytes (LPLs) isolated from the ileum of a rhesus macaque. Analysis of LPLs collected from the ileum showed a frequency of 36% CD4+ cells, 10% α4β7+ cells and 6% of cells that were both CD4+ and α4β7+ (Figure 4A). All cells were treated with either our A4B7-LCNPs or Iso-LCNPs control. LPLs treated with A4B7-LCNPs showed rhodamine B fluorescent was associated with most CD4+α4β7+ cells but not CD4-α4β7- cells (Figure 4B). Iso-LCNP control did not show any significant association with either CD4+ α4β7+ or CD4-α4β7- cells (Figure 4C). Comparison of the geometric mean fluorescent intensity (GMFI) showed that our A4B7-LCNPs had up to four-fold higher association with CD4+ α4β7+ cells compared to cells negative for both markers or cell populations treated with Iso-LCNPs (Figure 4D). These results demonstrated that A4B7-LCNPs targeted gut-homing T cells through a receptor-mediated process and could be used to potentially target CD4+α4β7+ cells in gut, thereby diminishing off-target effects and enhancing bioavailability in target cells.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A4B7-LCNPs specifically bind to CD4+α4β7+ cells from lamina propria lymphocytes (LPLs) isolated from rhesus macaque ileum. (A) Flow cytometry dot plot analysis of isolated LPLs stained with anti-CD4 FITC and anti-α4β7 APC (orange dots) or their respective isotype controls (black dots), indicating CD4+ α4β7+ or CD4- α4β7- cell subsets. (B, C) LPLs were treated with rhodamine B (Rhod B) conjugated A4B7-LCNPs (B) or Iso-LCNPs (C), and labeled with anti-CD4 FITC and anti-α4β7 APC antibodies. Histogram curves represent Rhod B fluorescent signals from untreated LPLs (black), LCNP-treated CD4-α4β7- LPL subsets (gray), or LCNP-treated CD4+ α4β7+ LPL subsets. (D) Corresponding bar graphs of geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI) are presented for A4B7-LCNPs or Iso-LCNPs binding to different subsets of LPLs. Data represents mean ± SD, n=3, ***p < 0.0005.

A4B7-LCNPs Enhance Accumulation in Mouse Small Intestine and Target α4β7+ Cells

In order to understand if α4β7 mAb could enhance LCNP accumulation in the gut by targeting α4β7+ cells, we administered fluorescently-labeled A4B7-LCNPs into mice by tail vein injection. To avoid autofluorescence, especially from the feces in the gut, we used a near-infrared dye, 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide (DiR), encapsulated into LCNPs. We performed in vitro release studies to ensure that the DiR remained associated with A4B7-LCNPs, and found that less than 7% of DiR released from A4B7-LCNPs over 24 hours in PBS at 37 °C. Compared to treatment with Iso-LCNPs, mice treated with A4B7-LCNPs showed significantly higher distribution of fluorescent particles in small intestines at 6 hours after administration (Figure 5A, B). There were no significant differences in nanoparticle distribution to other organs between A4B7-LCNP and Iso-LCNPs groups (Figure 5C). We also found that nanoparticles quickly accumulated in the small intestine within 6 hours after administration but were eliminated by 24 hours (Figure 5A). We performed histological examination of major organs after administering 50 mg/kg A4B7-LCNPs, Iso-LCNPs or the same volume of PBS dosed intravenously to mice. All the organs from three treatment groups displayed no morphological difference, indicating LCNPs were well tolerated. (Figure S7, Supporting Information).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

α4β7 mAb enhances LCNP accumulation in mouse small intestine compared to isotype control mAb. (A) Representative fluorescent images of mouse small intestines at 3, 6, 12, or 24 hours after intravenous administration of DiR loaded A4B7-LCNPs or Iso-LCNPs to mice. (B) Dot graph of total radiant efficiencies from Xenogen images of mouse small intestines at 6 hours post-administration of DiR loaded A4B7-LCNPs, Iso-LCNPs or PBS. (C) Dot graphs of total radiant efficiencies from Xenogen images of other organs (liver, kidney, spleen, lung and heart) and average radiant efficiencies from100 μL plasma. Data represents mean ± SD, ***p<0.0005. n=8 mice per group.

We also measured nanoparticle binding to LPLs isolated from small intestines of mice at12 hours. We observed that 19% of α4β7+ cells but not α4β7- from isolated mouse LPLs were associated with A4B7-LCNPs. In the control groups, no nanoparticle association was observed for any cell populations, indicating cell-specific binding of A4B7-LCNPs to gut-homing T cells when delivered to the small intestine (Figure 6). Such specific gut-homing T cell targeting in vivo might explain the observed higher accumulation of A4B7-LCNPs in the small intestine.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A4B7-LCNPs target α4β7+ cells among lamina propria lymphocytes (LPLs) from mouse small intestines at 12 hours post-administration. (A) Flow cytometry dot plot analysis of LPLs isolated from mouse small intestines indicating cells stained with anti-α4β7 APC (orange) or isotype control (gray). (B) Percentage of α4β7+ cells associated with rhodamine B conjugated A4B7-LCNP or Iso-LCNP analyzed by flow cytometry. (C-E) Representative histograms of flow cytometry analysis for α4β7+ (red) or α4β7- (gray) LPL subsets associated with LCNPs. Data represents mean ± SD, n=4 mice per group.

Discussion

Gut-homing T cells are attracting more attentions in the HIV field since they are actually infected at an early stage of infection and can traffic to the GALT within days of infection, leading to rapid virus replication, reservoir establishment and resistance to cART. Targeting these cells offers possible strategies to inhibit HIV transmission at specific reservoir sites and eradicate latent virus when combined with other therapeutics. In this work, we developed a core-shell nanoparticle surface modified with the α4β7 mAb for selectively targeting therapeutics to gut-homing T cells, which are cells that play an important role in HIV infection and drug resistance. Our A4B7-LCNPs delivered TPV, a potent protease inhibitor, and used the α4β7 mAb for its known capacity to inhibit HIV transmission, reduce virus load, and sustain virologic control.49, 50, 53, 54

We designed and optimized our nanoparticles to meet the following criteria: (1) conjugation with antibodies for targeting gut-homing T cells, (2) encapsulation of hydrophobic drugs, (3) ability to release both antibody and drug from the nanoparticle, (4) stability in physiological and storage conditions, and (5) biodegradability and biocompatibility. Our nanoparticles decorated with targeting antibodies were expected to significantly improve therapeutic effectiveness while reducing toxicity.55 Since we also aimed to deliver antibody and antiretroviral drugs as therapeutic agents to inhibit HIV transmission, achieving appropriate antibody and drug release kinetics from LCNPs for targeting was important.

TPV and α4β7 mAb co-delivered from our core-shell LCNPs retained and showed enhanced antiviral activity compared to the free drugs in preventing HIV-1SF2 infection of the HUT-78 human T cell line in vitro. While the mechanism for the antiviral activity of α4β7 mAb is not fully understood, the α4β7 integrin has been hypothesized to serve as a binding site for HIV-1 and facilitate cell-to-cell virus spreading through LFA-1.16 Therefore, blocking α4β7 with a monoclonal antibody may inhibit the virus from binding and prevent infection. As described in our in vitro and ex vivo targeting studies, we hypothesize that this combined effect might enhance cell binding to A4B7-LCNPs and cause increased local concentrations of the drugs.

This work is significant because targeting gut-homing T cells with the α4β7 mAb also enhanced biodistribution of LCNPs to the small intestines when delivered intravenously to mice compared to the isotype control mAb. Furthermore, we confirmed that A4B7-LCNPs accumulated in α4β7+ cells in the small intestines. Quantification of the dose that actually reached the major organs using DiR-labeled LCNPs also showed biodistribution of A4B7-LCNP in small intestines, liver and spleen. However, we observed specific accumulation of our A4B7-LCNP to the small intestine whereas the liver and spleen showed non-specific accumulation of the nanoparticles (Figure S8, Supporting Information). Radiolabeled nanoparticles could be used in the future to obtain more accurate quantification of dose biodistribution since we observed that recovery efficiency using fluorescence was low and tissue- and dose-dependent. Other studies have also shown that liposomes, PLGA nanoparticles and silica nanoparticles accumulate in the liver and spleen and attribute this finding to clearance processes and the fact that these organs are highly vascular.56, 57 As such, future work will need to focus on increasing circulation half-life.

One of the biggest obstacles for curing HIV is the existence of HIV reservoirs, which cannot be cleared by current antiretroviral therapy. Targeting anti-HIV drugs to HIV reservoirs has been investigated for decades, but has focused mainly on targeting CD4+ T cells or macrophages, in the lymph nodes or brain.25, 26, 2931, 58 Targeting gut-homing T cells has not been investigate although they are a major HIV reservoir.14, 17 In addition, studies have demonstrated that ARV drug concentrations in gut-associated lymphatic tissues (GALT) is 99% lower than what is found in the blood and can lead to reservoir persistence.18 Based on the TPV and α4β7 mAb loading in our LCNPs and their release data, we expect to improve the currently prescribed dosing of these therapeutics by only requiring a single dose once every two days to administer both drugs.49, 50 In addition, our data indicates that co-delivery of the α4β7 mAb and TPV together in a single LCNP had a modest but significant improvement in HIV inhibition compared to co-administration of the drugs separately. We also do not account for any improvement in efficacy that might arise from the targeting function of our formulations. The rapid accumulation of our A4B7-LCNPs carrying both TPV and antibodies in the gut may provide a potential strategy to combat HIV-1 at an early stage and minimize HIV reservoir size. Moreover, our nanoparticles have the potential to target additional cellular or anatomical reservoirs when conjugated with other targeting ligands,59 and deliver multiple agents such as latency reversing agents, HIV vaccines, neutralizing antibody, immune checkpoint inhibitors and gene-modifying oligonucleotide drugs for the eradication of HIV reservoirs.

Supplementary Material

Funding:

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (AI094412)

Abbreviations:

α4β7 mAb

monoclonal antibody against α4β7 integrin

A4B7-LCNP

LCNP surface conjugated with α4β7 mAb

APC anti-α4β7

α4β7 mAb conjugated to allophycocyanin

ARV

antiretroviral drug

cART

α4β7 integrin combination antiretroviral therapy

BCA

Bicinchoninic Aicd

BSA

Bovine serum albumin

CCR5

C-C chemokine receptor type 5

DiR

1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide

DL

drug loading

DLS

dynamic light scattering

DOPC

1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine

DOPC-NBD

1-Oleoyl-2-[12-[(7-nitro-2–1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino]dodecanoyl]-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphocholine

DOTAP

1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane

DSPE-PEG

1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethylene glycol)-2000]

DSPE-PEG-MAL

1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[maleimide(polyethylene glycol)-2000]

DSPE-PEG-CF

1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[poly(ethylene glycol)2000-N’-carboxyfluorescein]

DTT

dithiothreitol

EDTA

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

FBS

fetal bovine serum

GALT

gut-associated lymphoid tissue

HPLC

high-performance liquid chromatography

Iso-LCNP

LCNP surface conjugated with isotype control IgG mAb

LCNP

lipid-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid nanoparticles

LFA-1

lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1

LPAM-1

the mouse Peyer’s patch adhesion molecule 1 or α4β7 integrin

LPL

lamina propria lymphocytes

mAb

monoclonal antibody

MAdCAM-1

mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule-1

NC

nanocarrier

NTA

nanoparticle tracking analysis

PDI

polydispersity index

PEG

polyethylene glycol

PLGA

poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid

PVA

polyvinyl alcohol

STLV

simian T-cell lymphotropic virus

TEM

transmission electric microscope

TPV

tipranavir

TPV/LCNP

TPV loaded LCNP

TPV/A4B7-LCNP

TPV loaded LCNP surface conjugated with α4β7 mAb

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this study.

References

  • 1.Maldarelli F, Palmer S, King MS, Wiegand A, Polis MA, Mican J, et al. , ART Suppresses Plasma HIV-1 RNA to a Stable Set Point Predicted by Pretherapy Viremia. PLOS Pathogens. 2007;3:e46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Katlama C, Deeks SG, Autran B, Martinez-Picado J, van Lunzen J, Rouzioux C, et al. , Barriers to a cure for HIV: new ways to target and eradicate HIV-1 reservoirs. The Lancet. 2013;381:2109–2117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Churchill MJ, Deeks SG, Margolis DM, Siliciano RF and Swanstrom R, HIV reservoirs: what, where and how to target them. Nat Rev Micro. 2016;14:55–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chun T-W, Moir S and Fauci AS, HIV reservoirs as obstacles and opportunities for an HIV cure. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:584–589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Veazey RS, DeMaria M, Chalifoux LV, Shvetz DE, Pauley DR, Knight HL, et al. , Gastrointestinal Tract as a Major Site of CD4+ T Cell Depletion and Viral Replication in SIV Infection. Science. 1998;280:427–431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guadalupe M, Reay E, Sankaran S, Prindiville T, Flamm J, McNeil A, et al. , Severe CD4+ T-Cell Depletion in Gut Lymphoid Tissue during Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection and Substantial Delay in Restoration following Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. Journal of Virology. 2003;77:11708–11717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li Q, Duan L, Estes JD, Ma Z-M, Rourke T, Wang Y, et al. , Peak SIV replication in resting memory CD4+ T cells depletes gut lamina propria CD4+ T cells. Nature. 2005;434:1148–1152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mattapallil JJ, Douek DC, Hill B, Nishimura Y, Martin M and Roederer M, Massive infection and loss of memory CD4+ T cells in multiple tissues during acute SIV infection. Nature. 2005;434:1093–1097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chun T-W, Nickle DC, Justement JS, Meyers JH, Roby G, Hallahan CW, et al. , Persistence of HIV in Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue despite Long-Term Antiretroviral Therapy. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2008;197:714–720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wagner N, Löhler J, Kunkel EJ, Ley K, Leung E, Krissansen G, et al. , Critical role for β7 integrins in formation of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue. 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arihiro S, Ohtani H, Suzuki M, Murata M, Ejima C, Oki M, et al. , Differential expression of mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule‐ 1 (MAdCAM‐ 1) in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Pathology international. 2002;52:367–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Erle DJ, Briskin MJ, Butcher EC, Garcia-Pardo A, Lazarovits AI and Tidswell M, Expression and function of the MAdCAM-1 receptor, integrin alpha 4 beta 7, on human leukocytes. The Journal of Immunology. 1994;153:517–528 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Poles MA, Elliott J, Taing P, Anton PA and Chen IS, A preponderance of CCR5+ CXCR4+ mononuclear cells enhances gastrointestinal mucosal susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Journal of virology. 2001;75:8390–8399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cicala C, Martinelli E, McNally JP, Goode DJ, Gopaul R, Hiatt J, et al. , The integrin α4β7 forms a complex with cell-surface CD4 and defines a T-cell subset that is highly susceptible to infection by HIV-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106:20877–20882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Izcue A, Coombes JL and Powrie F, Regulatory lymphocytes and intestinal inflammation. Annual review of immunology. 2009;27:313–338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arthos J, Cicala C, Martinelli E, Macleod K, Van Ryk D, Wei D, et al. , HIV-1 envelope protein binds to and signals through integrin α4β7, the gut mucosal homing receptor for peripheral T cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:301–309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kader M, Wang X, Piatak M, Lifson J, Roederer M, Veazey R, et al. , α4+β7hiCD4+ memory T cells harbor most Th-17 cells and are preferentially infected during acute SIV infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2:439–449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fletcher CV, Staskus K, Wietgrefe SW, Rothenberger M, Reilly C, Chipman JG, et al. , Persistent HIV-1 replication is associated with lower antiretroviral drug concentrations in lymphatic tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111:2307–2312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fletcher CV, Staskus K, Wietgrefe SW, Rothenberger M, Reilly C, Chipman JG, et al. , Persistent HIV-1 replication is associated with lower antiretroviral drug concentrations in lymphatic tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:2307–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gomes MJ, das Neves J and Sarmento B, Nanoparticle-based drug delivery to improve the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy in the central nervous system. International journal of nanomedicine. 2014;9:1757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.das Neves J, Nunes R, Rodrigues F and Sarmento B, Nanomedicine in the development of anti-HIV microbicides. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2016;103:57–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jiang Y, Cao S, Bright DK, Bever AM, Blakney AK, Suydam IT, et al. , Nanoparticle-Based ARV Drug Combinations for Synergistic Inhibition of Cell-Free and Cell–Cell HIV Transmission. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2015;12:4363–4374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kocbek P, Obermajer N, Cegnar M, Kos J and Kristl J, Targeting cancer cells using PLGA nanoparticles surface modified with monoclonal antibody. Journal of Controlled Release. 2007;120:18–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gunaseelan S, Gunaseelan K, Deshmukh M, Zhang X and Sinko PJ, Surface modifications of nanocarriers for effective intracellular delivery of anti-HIV drugs. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2010;62:518–531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chiappetta DA, Hocht C, Opezzo JAW and Sosnik A, Intranasal administration of antiretroviral-loaded micelles for anatomical targeting to the brain in HIV. Nanomedicine. 2013;8:223–237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gerson T, Makarov E, Senanayake TH, Gorantla S, Poluektova LY and Vinogradov SV, Nano-NRTIs demonstrate low neurotoxicity and high antiviral activity against HIV infection in the brain. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2014;10:177–185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Senanayake TH, Gorantla S, Makarov E, Lu Y, Warren G and Vinogradov SV, Nanogel-Conjugated Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors and Their Combinations as Novel Antiviral Agents with Increased Efficacy against HIV-1 Infection. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2015;12:4226–4236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tang X, Liang Y, Liu X, Zhou S, Liu L, Zhang F, et al. , PLGA-PEG Nanoparticles Coated with Anti-CD45RO and Loaded with HDAC Plus Protease Inhibitors Activate Latent HIV and Inhibit Viral Spread. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2015;10:413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Puligujja P, McMillan J, Kendrick L, Li T, Balkundi S, Smith N, et al. , Macrophage Folate Receptor-Targeted Antiretroviral Therapy Facilitates Drug Entry, Retention, Antiretroviral Activities and Biodistribution for Reduction of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections. Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine. 2013;9: 10.1016/j.nano.2013.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kovochich M, Marsden MD and Zack JA, Activation of Latent HIV Using Drug-Loaded Nanoparticles. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kraft JC, McConnachie LA, Koehn J, Kinman L, Collins C, Shen DD, et al. , Long-acting combination anti-HIV drug suspension enhances and sustains higher drug levels in lymph node cells than in blood cells and plasma. AIDS (London, England). 2017;31:765–770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gautam N, Roy U, Balkundi S, Puligujja P, Guo D, Smith N, et al. , Preclinical Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Long-Acting Nanoformulated Antiretroviral Therapy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57:3110–3120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Leserman LD, Barbet J, Kourilsky F and Weinstein JN, Targeting to cells of fluorescent liposomes covalently coupled with monoclonal antibody or protein A. 1980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Manjappa AS, Chaudhari KR, Venkataraju MP, Dantuluri P, Nanda B, Sidda C, et al. , Antibody derivatization and conjugation strategies: Application in preparation of stealth immunoliposome to target chemotherapeutics to tumor. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011;150:2–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Béduneau A, Saulnier P, Hindré F, Clavreul A, Leroux J-C and Benoit J-P, Design of targeted lipid nanocapsules by conjugation of whole antibodies and antibody Fab’ fragments. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4978–4990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cheow WS and Hadinoto K, Factors affecting drug encapsulation and stability of lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2011;85:214–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mandal B, Bhattacharjee H, Mittal N, Sah H, Balabathula P, Thoma LA, et al. , Core–shell-type lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a drug delivery platform. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2013;9:474–491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang L, Chan JM, Gu FX, Rhee J-W, Wang AZ, Radovic-Moreno AF, et al. , Self-Assembled Lipid−Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles: A Robust Drug Delivery Platform. ACS Nano. 2008;2:1696–1702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Moon JJ, Suh H, Polhemus ME, Ockenhouse CF, Yadava A and Irvine DJ, Antigen-Displaying Lipid-Enveloped PLGA Nanoparticles as Delivery Agents for a Plasmodium vivax Malaria Vaccine. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e31472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bershteyn A, Chaparro J, Yau R, Kim M, Reinherz E, Ferreira-Moita L, et al. , Polymer-supported lipid shells, onions, and flowers. Soft matter. 2008;4:1787–1791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hadinoto K, Sundaresan A and Cheow WS, Lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a new generation therapeutic delivery platform: A review. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2013;85:427–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hanson MC, Bershteyn A, Crespo MP and Irvine DJ, Antigen Delivery by Lipid-Enveloped PLGA Microparticle Vaccines Mediated by in Situ Vesicle Shedding. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:2475–2481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cartiera MS, Johnson KM, Rajendran V, Caplan MJ and Saltzman WM, The uptake and intracellular fate of PLGA nanoparticles in epithelial cells. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2790–2798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Muzammil S, Armstrong A, Kang L, Jakalian A, Bonneau P, Schmelmer V, et al. , Unique thermodynamic response of tipranavir to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease drug resistance mutations. Journal of virology. 2007;81:5144–5154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Boesecke C and Cooper DA, Toxicity of HIV protease inhibitors: clinical considerations. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2008;3:653–659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Merisko-Liversidge EM and Liversidge GG, Drug nanoparticles: formulating poorly water-soluble compounds. Toxicologic pathology. 2008;36:43–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang H, Yu J, Lu X and He X, 2016. Nanoparticle systems reduce systemic toxicity in cancer treatment, Future Medicine, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.King JR and Acosta EP, Tipranavir. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2006;45:665–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Byrareddy SN, Kallam B, Arthos J, Cicala C, Nawaz F, Hiatt J, et al. , Targeting α4β7 integrin reduces mucosal transmission of simian immunodeficiency virus and protects gut-associated lymphoid tissue from infection. Nat Med. 2014;advance online publication [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Byrareddy SN, Arthos J, Cicala C, Villinger F, Ortiz KT, Little D, et al. , Virologic control in SIV+ macaques after antiretroviral and α4β7 antibody therapy. Science. 2016;354:197–202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yildirimer L, Thanh NTK, Loizidou M and Seifalian AM, Toxicology and clinical potential of nanoparticles. Nano Today. 2011;6:585–607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pan WJ, Hsu H, Rees WA, Lear SP, Lee F, Foltz IN, et al. , Pharmacology of AMG 181, a human anti-α(4)β(7) antibody that specifically alters trafficking of gut-homing T cells. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2013;169:51–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ansari AA, Reimann KA, Mayne AE, Takahashi Y, Stephenson ST, Wang R, et al. , Blocking of α4β7 gut-homing integrin during acute infection leads to decreased plasma and gastrointestinal tissue viral loads in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus macaques. The Journal of Immunology. 2011;186:1044–1059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pereira LE, Onlamoon N, Wang X, Wang R, Li J, Reimann KA, et al. , Preliminary in vivo efficacy studies of a recombinant rhesus anti-α4β7 monoclonal antibody. Cellular Immunology. 2009;259:165–176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gao J, Feng S-S and Guo Y, Antibody engineering promotes nanomedicine for cancer treatment. Nanomedicine. 2010;5:1141–1145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kumar R, Roy I, Ohulchanskky TY, Vathy LA, Bergey EJ, Sajjad M, et al. , In vivo biodistribution and clearance studies using multimodal organically modified silica nanoparticles. ACS nano. 2010;4:699–708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK and Farokhzad OC, Factors Affecting the Clearance and Biodistribution of Polymeric Nanoparticles. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2008;5:505–515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Buehler DC, Marsden MD, Shen S, Toso DB, Wu X, Loo JA, et al. , Bioengineered Vaults: Self-Assembling Protein Shell–Lipophilic Core Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. ACS Nano. 2014;8:7723–7732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cao S, Jiang Y, Levy Claire N, Hughes Sean M, Zhang H, Hladik F, et al. , Optimization and comparison of CD4‐ targeting lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles using different binding ligands. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2017;106:1177–1188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES