Abstract
The link between brain amyloid-β (Aβ), metabolism, and dementia symptoms remains a pressing question in Alzheimer’s disease. Here, using positron emission tomography ([18F]florbetapir tracer for Aβ and [18F]FDG tracer for glucose metabolism) with a novel analytical framework, we found that Aβ aggregation within the brain’s default mode network leads to regional hypometabolism in distant but functionally connected brain regions. Moreover, we found that an interaction between this hypometabolism with overlapping Aβ aggregation is associated with subsequent cognitive decline. These results were also observed in transgenic Aβ rats that do not form neurofibrillary tangles, which support these findings as an independent mechanism of cognitive deterioration. These results suggest a model in which distant Aβ induces regional metabolic vulnerability, whereas the interaction between local Aβ with a vulnerable environment drives the clinical progression of dementia.
Subject terms: Positron-emission tomography, Neuroscience, Alzheimer's disease, Dementia
Amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition occurs in Alzheimer's disease but its relation to disease features such as local brain hypometabolism or cognitive decline is unclear. Here, the authors show that Aβ aggregation in the brain’s default mode network leads to hypometabolism in distant but functionally connected areas.
Introduction
The relationship between regional cerebral amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregation and hypometabolism has been a topic of significant debate in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Whereas some studies suggest an association1–3, others refute that these pathological processes are directly related4,5. The lack of association between these pathologies has been supported by studies, showing the absence of hypometabolism in some brain regions with high Aβ load, as well as the presence of hypometabolism in other areas with low Aβ concentrations1,6,7. Notably, the lack of association between regional Aβ and hypometabolism contrasts with the idea of a direct deleterious effect of Aβ on disease progression, as initially proposed in the Aβ hypothesis8.
One possible explanation that links Aβ with disease progression and integrates the aforementioned conflicting observations is the idea that regional hypometabolism is caused by the toxic effects of Aβ aggregation from distant rather than topographically overlapping brain regions. Indeed, early observations using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) support this notion, by showing that brain damage may lead to hypometabolism in remote, but metabolically connected cortical areas9–11. These results highlight the possibility of a direct deleterious effect of Aβ on distant hypometabolism, which might be being overlooked by the current biomarker studies.
Regardless of the presence of a regional correlation between Aβ and hypometabolism, it is well established that the topographic coexistence of these pathologies in some brain regions such as the posterior cingulate cortex constitutes a signature of forthcoming dementia symptoms12–15. Also, studies have shown that either Aβ or hypometabolism may be the first abnormality in these regions16,17, and that cognitive changes may be potentiated by an interaction between these processes18. Together, these results indicate that although regional Aβ may not be the cause of its overlapping hypometabolism, progression to dementia may be the result of local interactions between these pathologies.
Here, we tested the hypothesis that distant and local Aβ effects play a distinct role in the progression of AD. We find that distant Aβ determines the region’s metabolic vulnerability, whereas the synergy between this regional vulnerability with co-localized concentrations of Aβ determines dementia. These results were obtained in cognitively normal (CN) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) individuals as well as transgenic rats that display Aβ single pathology in the absence of other brain human proteinopathies, such as neurofibrillary tangles. We therefore conclude that the deleterious effect of Aβ on the progression of AD occurs in a two-step process, in which distant Aβ determines regional vulnerability and local Aβ drives cognitive decline.
Results
Aβ is unrelated to local hypometabolism
Demographics and key characteristics of the human population are summarized in Table 1. Voxel-wise analysis of covariance showed that compared with CN Aβ-negative individuals, CN Aβ positive and MCI Aβ positive had reduced gray matter density in the medial temporal cortex (Supplementary Fig. 1a, d). CN Aβ positive and MCI Aβ positive had reduced metabolism in the precuneus, posterior cingulate, inferior parietal, and temporal cortices (Supplementary Fig. 1b, e), and had widespread Aβ deposition (Supplementary Fig. 1c, f).
Table 1.
CN Aβ negative | CN Aβ positive | MCI Aβ positive | P-values | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of subjects | 99 | 53 | 170 | – |
Age, y, mean (SD) | 74.5 (6.7) | 75.3 (6.9) | 73.2 (6.7) | 0.090 |
Male, no. (%) | 56 (57)b | 15 (28) | 88 (52)b | 0.002 |
Education, y, mean (SD) | 16.5 (2.8) | 16 (2.3) | 15.9 (2.7) | 0.234 |
APOE ε4, no. (%) | 20 (20) | 20 (38)a | 106 (62)a,b | <0.001 |
[18F]Florbetapir, mean SUVR (SD) | 1.07 (0.05) | 1.30 (0.09)a | 1.35 (0.11)a,b | <0.001 |
MMSE, score, mean (SD) | 29.1 (1.2) | 28.9 (1.1) | 27.7 (1.9)a,b | <0.001 |
MMSE, slope of change, y, mean (SD) | −0.08 (0.52) | −0.12 (0.57) | −0.95 (1.65)a,b | <0.001 |
Follow-up, y, mean (SD) | 3.41 (0.97) | 3.49 (1.0) | 3.26 (1.07) | 0.256 |
Visits, no. (SD) | 3.75 (0.69) | 3.75 (0.81) | 4.06 (1.08)a | 0.010 |
P-values indicate the values assessed with analyses of variance for each variable, except for gender and APOE ε4 status where a contingency chi-square was performed. Post-hoc analysis provided significant differences between groups from:
aCN Aβ negative
bCN Aβ positive
Voxel-wise models showed that Aβ was not locally associated with hypometabolism in CN Aβ-positive and MCI Aβ-positive individuals. On the other hand, these models showed that global Aβ was associated with hypometabolism in the posterior cingulate, precuneus, lateral temporal, and inferior parietal cortices in CN Aβ positive (Fig. 1a, d; Supplementary Fig. 2a; and Supplementary Fig. 3a) and MCI Aβ positive (Fig. 1b, e; Supplementary Fig. 2b; and Supplementary Fig. 3b). In addition, a bootstrap-scheme supported that regional Aβ did not affect the stability of the global Aβ effects on hypometabolism in the models mentioned above (Supplementary Fig. 4).
We further replicated the results found in humans using a cohort of 20 rats (10 homozygous McGill-R-Thy1-APP rats overexpressing human Aβ precursor protein and 10 wild-type Wistar rats). They were 11-month-old, and the wild-type rats provided the means for determining that 11-month McGill-R-Thy1-APP transgenic rats presented mild cognitive symptoms, with a significant baseline genotype effect on the Morris Water Maze (MWM) (P = 0.03). In the transgenic Aβ rats, voxel-wise regressions supported that local Aβ and hypometabolism were unrelated to one another. On the other hand, the model revealed that global Aβ load was strongly associated with hypometabolism in the retrosplenial (which corresponds to the posterior cingulate in humans19), medial and lateral temporal, and inferior parietal cortices (Fig. 1c, f).
Aβ leads to hypometabolism in functionally connected regions
In CN Aβ-negative (Fig. 2a), CN Aβ-positive (Fig. 2b), and MCI Aβ-positive (Fig. 2c) individuals, metabolic connectivity analysis showed that the regions comprising the brain's DMN in the precuneus, posterior cingulate, lateral temporal, inferior parietal, and medial prefrontal cortices were highly correlated with each other.
Partial correlation matrices using anatomical segregated regions-of-interest revealed that Aβ was negatively associated with metabolism in distant, but metabolically connected brain regions in CN Aβ-positive (Fig. 2d) and MCI Aβ-positive (Fig. 2e–l; Supplementary Movie 1) individuals. Notably, the elements of the Aβ-glucose and glucose–glucose matrices were highly negatively correlated with one another in these individuals (r = −0.5, P < 0.0001), which reinforced the link between metabolic connectivity and Aβ effect. Furthermore, the lack of correlation between the Aβ-glucose matrix elements and the Euclidean distance between regions (r = 0.1, P = 0.3294) supported that regions' proximity did not drive these correlations.
Voxel-wise network analysis showed that Aβ load in the precuneus, posterior cingulate, lateral temporal, inferior parietal, and medial prefrontal cortices were associated with distant, but within-DMN hypometabolism in CN Aβ-positive (Fig. 3) and MCI Aβ-positive (Fig. 4b–f) individuals. On the other hand, Aβ outside of the DMN either did not associate with hypometabolism or was associated with hypometabolism predominantly in regions comprising other brain networks, such as the limbic and ventral attention networks (Fig. 4g, h).
In the transgenic Aβ rats, a voxel-wise regression analysis confirmed that Aβ was associated with distant, rather than co-localized, hypometabolism (Fig. 5). As expected, there were no associations between Aβ uptake and metabolism in the wild-type control rats.
Synergy of Aβ and local hypometabolism on cognitive decline
A voxel-wise interaction model showed that high local levels of Aβ and low local levels of glucose uptake in the precuneus, posterior cingulate, inferior parietal, and lateral temporal cortices synergistically determined subsequent cognitive decline up to 5.6 years in MCI Aβ-positive individuals (Fig. 6a, c; Supplementary Fig. 5; Supplementary Movie 2). In addition, a bootstrap analysis supported that the effect of the local interaction between Aβ and metabolism on cognitive decline was not influenced by a global Aβ effect (Supplementary Fig. 6). Moreover, analysis of variance reinforced that the models with the interaction term best described the relationship between overlapping biomarkers and cognitive decline as compared with reduced models assessing: (1) only Aβ, (2) only metabolism, and (3) Aβ plus metabolism, with a P < 0.0001 in all three cases. In CN Aβ-positive individuals, the aforementioned interaction was not significantly associated with cognitive decline.
In the transgenic Aβ rats, a voxel-wise interaction model supported the synergy between Aβ and overlapping hypometabolism in the retrosplenial, inferior parietal, and mediolateral temporal cortices as a determinant of cognitive decline over 8 months (Fig. 6b, d). This interaction was absent in the wild-type control rats.
Distant and local Aβ effects on hypometabolism
Structured equation modeling (SEM) showed that the construct in which Aβ occurring in distant regions drives hypometabolism, whereas the interaction between this hypometabolism and the co-localized Aβ determines cognitive decline well describe AD progression (Fig. 7).
Discussion
In summary, our results suggest that Aβ is related to vulnerability in distant brain regions functionally connected by the DMN, whereas the synergy between this vulnerability with local Aβ levels is associated with the clinical progression to dementia (Fig. 8). Remarkably, similar results in transgenic Aβ rats, which do not form neurofibrillary tangles20, supported this model as an independent mechanism of cognitive deterioration.
Our results suggest that the regional hypometabolism observed in AD may derive from distant Aβ effects within brain regions connected by the DMN. This observation is supported by early studies showing that lesions in remote brain regions are associated with DMN hypometabolism9–11. For instance, studies in non-human primates show that localized surgical lesions lead to hypometabolism in metabolically connected brain areas, and that the severity of the inflicted lesion correlates with the degree of remote hypometabolism11. These studies suggest that this occurs due to a synaptic disconnection between the damaged and the remote brain region11. Based on these observations, one may argue that the regional patterns of hypometabolism in AD derive from a decreased synaptic input from distant, but DMN connected brain areas affected by Aβ. Also, we have shown that global Aβ load, rather than local, is associated with regional DMN hypometabolism, which is in line with previous studies4. Expanding upon these studies, our findings indicate that this might be explained by the fact that Aβ from several distant brain regions contributes to regional hypometabolism. Therefore, it seems reasonable that a global Aβ composite contemplating all distant brain regions shows a better association with regional hypometabolism than merely local Aβ levels. Altogether, our results corroborate the deleterious effects of Aβ on the DMN as previously suggested by the network neurodegeneration hypothesis of AD15,21,22, by showing that Aβ leads to hypometabolism in distant brain regions interconnected by the DMN, rather than locally, as inferred from the traditional view22.
On the other hand, our results support the synergy between Aβ and topographically overlapping DMN vulnerability as a driving force behind dementia symptoms. It is well known that individuals might respond differently to Aβ based on their capacity to compensate through the reconfiguration of pre-existent or recruitment of alternative synapses using the DMN22,23. Moreover, DMN hypometabolism has been repeatedly suggested to represent underlying network dysfunction4,14,24, and metabolic connectivity has been shown to represent synaptic pathways in the human brain25–27. Thus, the hypometabolism in our results may indicate the dysfunction of the DMN in recruiting alternative synapses in the face of toxic effects of Aβ. As such, our model could be understood to mean that the toxic effects of Aβ and the underlying local levels of DMN dysfunction in handling these toxic effects synergistically determine the severity of the subsequent cognitive deterioration. Together, these findings support that regional vulnerability to Aβ plays an important role in the progression to AD and that this occurs through the decrease of the capacity of the DMN to compensate for the deleterious effects of Aβ28–30.
Although our results suggested that regional metabolic vulnerability depends on distant Aβ, other factors may potentiate this vulnerability in AD. Determinants of such vulnerability might include inflammatory agents and pathology related stressors that might lead to biochemical dysregulations, resulting in decreased synaptic exchanges and therefore hypometabolism29,31–33. Other factors may include cerebral vascular diseases, systemic metabolic disorders, and allele variants implicated in brain plasticity and resilience34–36. Also, previous studies have proposed that APOE ε4 may lead to hypometabolism independently of Aβ37,38. Recently, it has been shown that astrocytes play an important role in [18F]FDG signal39. Since astrocytes have been associated with numerous mechanisms involving neuronal plasticity and transmission40, astrocytic dysfunction may be involved in the DMN vulnerability reported here.
As previously reported by our group and others, interactions between Aβ and tau proteins determine AD progression34,41,42. Since glucose metabolism is proposed to be closely linked to tau pathology36, the regional effects of hypometabolism in this study could be merely inferred as a proxy of neurofibrillary tangles. Therefore, we used the McGill-R-Thy1-APP rats overexpressing human Aβ pathology to clarify our results. Remarkably, the similar results in our transgenic Aβ rats, which do not form tangles20, supported the associations between Aβ and DMN vulnerability as a tau-independent mechanism of cognitive deterioration. It is worth to mention that, although independent, this model is likely to be highly potentiated by neurofibrillary tangles, which is supported by the more markedly cognitive deterioration found in humans as compared with the transgenic Aβ rats. Indeed, it is probable that the Aβ-induced metabolic vulnerability reported here will create a favorable environment, also for neurofibrillary tangles to determine cognitive decline. Importantly, the DMN is an evolutionarily conserved feature involved in the integration of cognitive abilities in humans and rodents19,43.
Methodological strengths of this study include the use of continuous biomarkers analyzed with a robust voxel-wise approach and the use of an animal model in a controlled experimental setting, which permitted assessing the effects of Aβ on metabolism independent of possible confounding factors, such as neurofibrillary tangles. This study has methodological limitations. Our studied population represents a self-selected group of elderly individuals motivated to participate in an AD study. Therefore, these individuals may not represent a general elderly population. Importantly, the model proposed in this study should be confirmed by future studies using different populations and long-term sequential biomarkers and clinical observations performed at multiple time points. In a heterogeneous population such as MCIs, some individuals have early Aβ deposition and may present a positive association between Aβ and metabolism44, while others in later disease stages may present a negative association. Thus, these opposing phenomena in the same population may obscure the regional association between these biomarkers. Although we restricted our analyses to Aβ-positive individuals and adjusted the models for p-tau levels, we cannot exclude that other pathological processes than Aβ—such as tau aggregates, neuroinflammation, cholinergic depletion, cerebrovascular disease, α-synuclein, and TDP-43—have influenced the interpretation of these results45. Also, the lack of tau PET images is an important limitation of these results. McGill-R-Thy1-APP rats develop Aβ plaque and oligomeric species46. Since regional Aβ load is highly associated with regional oligomeric Aβ32, the deleterious effects of Aβ on metabolism reported here might reflect oligomers rather than fibrillar conformations. Also, there are large pathophysiological differences between human AD and transgenic models overexpressing Aβ. However, it is important to mention that the less aggressive progression of Aβ in rats, compared with mice, makes this model more similar to the insidious disease progression of elderlies with sporadic AD. For instance, McGill-R-Thy1-APP mice and rats express exactly the same mutations, but rats present plaques at 6–9 months while mice do as early as at 4 months20. Importantly, the much larger brain size of rats (approximately five times bigger than mice) makes the identification of specific brain structures using techniques with low spatial resolution, such as PET, possible to be performed in this study47.
To conclude, our results suggest that within the brain’s DMN, regional vulnerability is associated with distant Aβ, while the interaction between this vulnerability with local Aβ is associated with dementia.
Methods
Human subjects
The data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, phases GO, and 2 (adni.loni.usc.edu). ADNI was launched in 2003 as a public-private partnership, led by Principal Investigator Michael W. Weiner, MD. The primary goal of ADNI has been to test whether serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PET, other biological markers, and clinical and neuropsychological assessments can be combined to measure the progression of MCI and early AD. ADNI study was conducted according to Good Clinical Practice guidelines, US 21CFR Part 50—Protection of Human Subjects, and Part 56—Institutional Review Boards, and pursuant to state and federal HIPAA regulations and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating site (adni.loni.usc.edu). Written informed consent for the study was obtained from all participants and/or authorized representatives. We studied participants who had [18F]FDG PET, [18F]florbetapir PET, MRI, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau at baseline, as well as cognitive assessments at baseline and follow-up. Cognition was assessed with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test 30-min delayed recall, Trail Making Test Part A and B, and Boston Naming Test. For this study, we selected CN individuals and MCI Aβ-positive individuals. CN individuals had an MMSE score of 24 or higher, and a clinical dementia rating (CDR) of 0. MCIs had MMSE scores equal to or greater than 24, a CDR of 0.5, subjective and objective memory impairments, essentially normal activities of daily living, and were not demented (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke–Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria for probable AD48). Individuals did not present other neuropsychiatric disorders (further information about ADNI cognitive tests and inclusion/exclusion criteria may be found at www.adni-info.org).
Animal use
We imaged and cognitively assessed 20 rats, 10 homozygous McGill-R-Thy1-APP rats overexpressing human Aβ precursor protein20 with the Swedish double mutation (K670N, M671L49) and the Indiana mutation (V717F50), along with 10 wild-type Wistar rats. Half of the rats in each group were males. The rats performed MRI, [18F]FDG PET, and [18F]NAV4694 PET at baseline (11-month-old (SD 0.14)), as well as the MWM test at baseline and at 8 months follow-up. The MWM was performed with four trials per day, over 4 consecutive days. The rats were placed on the platform if they failed to find it within 90 s, and we assumed a maximum trial length of 90 s51. The time to find the platform was measured with overhead camera tracking using ANY-maze software (Stoelting Co.). One probe trial (no platform) and one visible platform trial were also conducted at the end of the 4th day. All rats were kept in ventilated cages in groups of two in environmentally controlled conditions: 12 h light/dark cycle at 21 °C with access to food and water ad libitum. All procedures involving rats were performed in accordance with the ethical regulations for animal testing and research from the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the National Institutes of Health and received ethical approval from the Animal Care Ethics Committee of the McGill University.
Human imaging methods
MRI and PET acquisitions followed ADNI protocols (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/methods). T1-weighted MRIs were corrected for field distortions, non-uniformity corrected, brain masked, segmented, and non-linearly transformed to the MNI reference space using the CIVET pipeline52. Subsequently, gray matter density was computed using voxel-wise morphometry. PET scans used [18F]florbetapir tracer for imaging Aβ and [18F]FDG tracer for imaging glucose metabolism. Briefly, PET images were non-linearly registered to the MNI space using the individual’s PET/T1-weighted native MRI registration and the individual’s non-linear MRI transformation to MNI space. PET images were spatially smoothed to achieve a final 8-mm full-width at half-maximum resolution and corrected for partial volume effects using region-based voxel-wise (RBV) method53. [18F]Florbetapir and [18F]FDG SUVR images were obtained using the cerebellum gray matter and the pons as reference regions, respectively. A global [18F]florbetapir SUVR value was obtained using the precuneus, posterior and anterior cingulate, inferior parietal, paracentral, medial prefrontal, lateral temporal, and orbitofrontal cortices. Individuals were Aβ positive if [18F]florbetapir SUVR > 1.1554. Further information and the schematic representation of the human imaging methods pipeline may be found elsewhere34 and in the Supplementary Fig. 7.
Rat imaging methods
MRIs were acquired using a Bruker 7T BioSpec 70/30 USR animal dedicated. First, the rats were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane/medical air, which was then maintained at 1–2% after placing the animals in the scanner, with the breathing at 20–30 breaths per min. We used a 37 °C constant airflow to maintain the rats warm. The structural images were generated using the 7T Bruker standard 3D-True Fast Imaging with Steady State Precession (FISP) pulse sequence55. Gray matter density was computed using voxel-wise morphometry. PET images were acquired using a CTI Concorde R4 microPET for rodents (Siemens). PET scans used [18F]NAV4694 tracer for imaging Aβ and [18F]FDG tracer for imaging glucose metabolism. In preparation for the scans, rats received anesthesia using 5% isoflurane, which was then maintained at 2% throughout the procedure. The animals underwent a 9-min transmission scan using a rotating57 Co point source before each PET image acquisition. For [18F]NAV4694, a 60-min dynamic emission scan began concomitantly with the bolus injection of the radiotracer via the tail vein. For [18F]FDG, after fasting for 12 h, the animals received the radiotracer injection during the awake state via the tail vein. Then, a 20-min dynamic emission scan at 50 min post injection was performed. PET images were reconstructed using a maximum a posteriori algorithm and corrected for scattering, dead time, and decay. [18F]NAV4694 non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) parametric images were generated using the Simplified Reference Tissue Method with the cerebellar gray matter as a reference56. [18F]FDG SUVR images were generated using the pons as the reference region. PET images were co-registered to the animal’s MRI and non-linearly transformed to a standardized rat brain space created based on the wild-type rats MRIs. PET images were spatially smoothed using a Gaussian kernel with a full-width at half-maximum of 2.4 mm. Further information and the schematic representation of the rat imaging methods pipeline may be found elsewhere47 and in Supplementary Fig. 8.
Human CSF analysis
CSF p-tau at threonine 181 was measured using a multiplex xMAP Luminex platform (Luminex Corp, Austin, TX) with INNO-BIA AlzBio3 immunoassay kit-based reagents (Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium)57,58. Details about CSF acquisition and quantification can be found at www.adni-info.org.
Statistical analysis
Regressions were performed using R Statistical Software Package version 3.1.2 (http://www.r-project.org/) to test for significant associations between biomarkers and also demographic differences between groups for continuous variables, whereas chi-square was used for categorical variables. The voxel-wise analyses were performed using MATLAB software version 9.2 (http://www.mathworks.com) with a computational framework developed to perform complex voxel-wise statistical operations, such as interaction models, using multiple imaging modalities in humans and rats (Fig. 9)59.
In humans, we evaluated the brain abnormalities associated with the clinical diagnosis using a voxel-wise analysis of variance, in which the signal intensity of the imaging modality was used as the dependent variable, while the diagnosis was used as the independent variable.
Subsequently, voxel-wise regression models, taking into consideration voxel and global Aβ concentrations, tested the association between Aβ deposition and glucose metabolism in humans and rats. In humans, we also considered age, gender, education, APOE ε4 status, p-tau, and gray matter density in the models, whereas in rats, age, gender, and gray matter density were considered.
Then, connectivity analysis was performed using eight regions-of-interest used to assess the global PET Aβ value in the precuneus, posterior and anterior cingulate, inferior parietal, paracentral, medial prefrontal, lateral temporal, and orbitofrontal cortices as well as two additional regions in the insular and occipital cortices, using coordinates in the MNI ICBM atlas60. The edge values were assumed to be the correlation coefficients between regions, which were used as the matrix elements. Interregional correlation coefficients were computed using Pearson partial correlation analysis controlling for age, gender, education, APOE ε4 status, p-tau, and gray matter density. Metabolic connectivity was assessed with a symmetric matrix showing the strength of the correlation of glucose uptake between regions. An asymmetric matrix assessed the associations of Aβ deposition and hypometabolism between regions-of-interest. The matrices were corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni at P < 0.05. FDG-FDG and FDG-Aβ matrix elements were further correlated using Pearson's correlation. We also tested the correlation between the matrix elements and the Euclidean distance between nodes (mm) to ensure that the results were not driven by regions' proximity.
In humans, we further performed a voxel-wise connectivity analysis using Aβ values within the 10 regions-of-interest mentioned above as independent predictors and glucose metabolism at every voxel as the outcome accounting for age, gender, education, APOE ε4 status, p-tau, and gray matter density. In addition, a brain network atlas provided the means to assess the overlap between the results and functional networks (default mode, frontoparietal, dorsal and ventral attention, limbic, visual, and somatomotor networks61). In rats, a voxel-wise connectivity analysis was performed using Aβ values in eight regions-of-interest, based on previous literature, in retrosplenial, medial temporal, lateral temporal, inferior parietal, frontoparietal, olfactory bulb, cerebellar, and somatosensory cortices as independent predictors and glucose metabolism at every voxel as the outcome accounting for age, gender, and gray matter density19,43.
The association between image biomarkers and cognitive changes was tested in humans with a voxel-wise model using the slope of change in cognitive performance as the dependent variable and the main and interactive effects of [18F]florbetapir SUVR and [18F]FDG SUVR at every voxel as independent predictors. The slope of change in cognitive performance was defined using all available MMSE evaluations for each subject with a mean of 4 (SD: 0.96) evaluations spanning up to 5.6 years (mean of 3.4 years (SD: 1.02)). The analysis was adjusted for global Aβ, age, gender, education, APOE ε4 status, p-tau, gray matter density, and follow-up duration. The voxel-wise interaction model was built as follows:
1 |
In rats, we built the same voxel-wise model performed in humans using the slope of change in the MWM as the dependent variable and the main and interactive effects of [18F]NAV4694 BPND and [18F]FDG SUVR as independent predictors. A slope of change in cognitive performance was defined for each rat using the MWM changes in average (four trials) latency to find the platform over 8 months. The model was adjusted for global Aβ, age, gender, and gray matter density. The voxel-wise interaction model was built as follows:
2 |
Statistical parametric maps were corrected for multiple comparisons, and the statistical significance was defined using a family-wise error rate (FWER) threshold of P < 0.05.
The presence of collinearity between regional and global Aβ PET values could inflate the variance of estimates, potentially leading to incorrect the statistical results of significance when both effects are used in the same model. To assess whether such case occurred in our analysis, we investigated the stability of estimates by measuring the variance based on a resampling scheme repeated 10,000 times. In addition, the adequacy of the models with the interaction term was further assessed with an analysis of variance comparing the interaction model with each reduced model: (1) Aβ, (2) metabolism, and (3) Aβ plus metabolism.
The relationship between Aβ, metabolism, and the longitudinal cognitive decline was further assessed via SEM using the R package Lavaan62. SEM was built to test the specific hypotheses demonstrated in the figure’s meta-model63. SEM was classified as satisfactory whether: comparative fit index (CFI) > 0.95 and standardized root mean-square residual (SRMR) < 0.164.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica; Biogen; Bristol–Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche and its affiliated company Genentech; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck; Meso Scale Diagnostics; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study at the University of California, San Diego. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California. This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (MOP-11-51-31, PR-N), Weston Brain Institute (P.R.-N.), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-11-51-31, P.R.-N.), the Alzheimer's Association (NIRG-12- 92090 and NIRP-12-259245, P.R.-N.), the Alzheimer Society Research Program and the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) (T.A.P.). A.C.C. has been supported by the CIHR. A.C.C., S.G., and P.R.-N. are members of the CIHR/CCNA.
Author contributions
T.A.P., S.G. and P.R.-N. performed the conception of the study and interpreted the data. T.A.P., S.Ma., A.L.B., S.Mo., M.S.K., M.C. and J.T. performed the processing, analysis, and quality control of the image data. M.S.K., M.S. and M.J.P. performed the acquisition of the animal data. A.C.C. developed the transgenic rat model. B.M. assisted in the metabolic network analysis. A.Y.P., J.A.D.A. and H.H. assisted in the statistical analysis. T.A.P., J.P.S., A.C.C., S.G. and P.R.-N. prepared figures, table, and drafted the paper. All authors revised and approved the final paper draft.
Data availability
All human data used in this study were downloaded online at the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database (adni.loni.usc.edu). The locally processed human brain images (MRI and PET) and the animal data are not publicly available for download, but might be retrieved from the correspondent author on a request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-10217-w.
References
- 1.Edison P, et al. Amyloid, hypometabolism, and cognition in Alzheimer disease: an [11C]PIB and [18F]FDG PET study. Neurology. 2007;68:501–508. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244749.20056.d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Engler H, et al. Two-year follow-up of amyloid deposition in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Brain : a J. Neurol. 2006;129:2856–2866. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lowe VJ, et al. Association of hypometabolism and amyloid levels in aging, normal subjects. Neurology. 2014;82:1959–1967. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Altmann A, et al. Regional brain hypometabolism is unrelated to regional amyloid plaque burden. Brain : a J. Neurol. 2015;138:3734–3746. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Furst AJ, et al. Cognition, glucose metabolism and amyloid burden in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. aging. 2012;33:215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li Y, et al. Regional analysis of FDG and PIB-PET images in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. imaging. 2008;35:2169–2181. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0833-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Forster S, et al. Regional expansion of hypometabolism in Alzheimer's disease follows amyloid deposition with temporal delay. Biol. Psychiatry. 2012;71:792–797. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297:353–356. doi: 10.1126/science.1072994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nagasawa H, Kogure K, Fujiwara T, Itoh M, Ido T. Metabolic disturbances in exo-focal brain areas after cortical stroke studied by positron emission tomography. J. Neurol. Sci. 1994;123:147–153. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(94)90217-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Akiyama H, Harrop R, McGeer P, Peppard R, McGeer E. Crossed cerebellar and uncrossed basal ganglia and thalarnic diaschisis in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1989;39:541–541. doi: 10.1212/WNL.39.4.541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meguro K, et al. Neocortical and hippocampal glucose hypometabolism following neurotoxic lesions of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices in the non-human primate as shown by PET. Brain : a J. Neurol. 1999;122:1519–1531. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.8.1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Buckner RL, et al. Molecular, structural, and functional characterization of Alzheimer's disease: evidence for a relationship between default activity, amyloid, and memory. J. Neurosci. : Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2005;25:7709–7717. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2177-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mosconi Lisa. Glucose metabolism in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease: methodological and physiological considerations for PET studies. Clinical and Translational Imaging. 2013;1(4):217–233. doi: 10.1007/s40336-013-0026-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Landau SM, et al. Amyloid deposition, hypometabolism, and longitudinal cognitive decline. Ann. Neurol. 2012;72:578–586. doi: 10.1002/ana.23650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sperling RA, et al. Amyloid deposition is associated with impaired default network function in older persons without dementia. Neuron. 2009;63:178–188. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jack CR, Jr., et al. Amyloid-first and neurodegeneration-first profiles characterize incident amyloid PET positivity. Neurology. 2013;81:1732–1740. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000435556.21319.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Palmqvist S, et al. Earliest accumulation of beta-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1214. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01150-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mormino EC, et al. Synergistic effect of beta-amyloid and neurodegeneration on cognitive decline in clinically normal individuals. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:1379–1385. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lu H, et al. Rat brains also have a default mode network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:3979–3984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200506109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Do Carmo S, Cuello AC. Modeling Alzheimer's disease in transgenic rats. Mol. Neurodegener. 2013;8:37. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-8-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Seeley WW, Crawford RK, Zhou J, Miller BL, Greicius MD. Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks. Neuron. 2009;62:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Buckner RL, Andrews‐Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain's default network. Ann. New Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1124:1–38. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Elman JA, et al. Neural compensation in older people with brain amyloid-[beta] deposition. Nat. Neurosci. 2014;17:1316–1318. doi: 10.1038/nn.3806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Passow S, et al. Default‐mode network functional connectivity is closely related to metabolic activity. Hum. brain Mapp. 2015;36:2027–2038. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Riedl V, et al. Metabolic connectivity mapping reveals effective connectivity in the resting human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:428–433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513752113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee DS, et al. Metabolic connectivity by interregional correlation analysis using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and FDG brain PET; methodological development and patterns of metabolic connectivity in adults. Eur. J. Nucl. Med Mol. Imaging. 2008;35:1681–1691. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0808-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stern Y, et al. Brain networks associated with cognitive reserve in healthy young and old adults. Cereb. Cortex. 2005;15:394–402. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ. A critical appraisal of the pathogenic protein spread hypothesis of neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016;17:251–260. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mattson MP, Magnus T. Ageing and neuronal vulnerability. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006;7:278–294. doi: 10.1038/nrn1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jackson WS. Selective vulnerability to neurodegenerative disease: the curious case of Prion Protein. Dis. Models Mech. 2014;7:21–29. doi: 10.1242/dmm.012146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Savas JN, et al. The sorting receptor SorCS1 regulates trafficking of neurexin and AMPA receptors. Neuron. 2015;87:764–780. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lesne SE, et al. Brain amyloid-beta oligomers in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Brain : a J. Neurol. 2013;136:1383–1398. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kreisl WC, et al. In vivo radioligand binding to translocator protein correlates with severity of Alzheimer's disease. Brain : a J. Neurol. 2013;136:2228–2238. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pascoal T A, Mathotaarachchi S, Mohades S, Benedet A L, Chung C-O, Shin M, Wang S, Beaudry T, Kang M S, Soucy J-P, Labbe A, Gauthier S, Rosa-Neto P. Amyloid-β and hyperphosphorylated tau synergy drives metabolic decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Molecular Psychiatry. 2016;22(2):306–311. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mesulam MM. Neuroplasticity failure in Alzheimer's disease: bridging the gap between plaques and tangles. Neuron. 1999;24:521–529. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81109-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ossenkoppele R, et al. Tau, amyloid, and hypometabolism in a patient with posterior cortical atrophy. Ann. Neurol. 2015;77:338–342. doi: 10.1002/ana.24321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jagust WJ, Landau SM, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I, Apolipoprotein E. not fibrillar beta-amyloid, reduces cerebral glucose metabolism in normal aging. J. Neurosci. : Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2012;32:18227–18233. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3266-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.de Leon MJ, et al. Positron emission tomography studies of normal aging: a replication of PET III and 18-FDG using PET VI and 11-CDG. Neurobiol. Aging. 1987;8:319–323. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(87)90070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zimmer Eduardo R, Parent Maxime J, Souza Débora G, Leuzy Antoine, Lecrux Clotilde, Kim Hyoung-Ihl, Gauthier Serge, Pellerin Luc, Hamel Edith, Rosa-Neto Pedro. [18F]FDG PET signal is driven by astroglial glutamate transport. Nature Neuroscience. 2017;20(3):393–395. doi: 10.1038/nn.4492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Volterra A, Meldolesi J. Astrocytes, from brain glue to communication elements: the revolution continues. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005;6:626–640. doi: 10.1038/nrn1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pascoal Tharick A., Mathotaarachchi Sulantha, Shin Monica, Benedet Andrea L., Mohades Sara, Wang Seqian, Beaudry Tom, Kang Min Su, Soucy Jean-Paul, Labbe Aurelie, Gauthier Serge, Rosa-Neto Pedro. Synergistic interaction between amyloid and tau predicts the progression to dementia. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2017;13(6):644–653. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fortea J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and phospho-tau biomarker interactions affecting brain structure in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Ann. Neurol. 2014;76:223–230. doi: 10.1002/ana.24186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Swanson L. Brain maps: structure of the rat brain (2nd edn) Nature. 1992;363:347–350. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ashraf A, Fan Z, Brooks DJ, Edison P. Cortical hypermetabolism in MCI subjects: a compensatory mechanism? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2015;42:447–458. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2919-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jicha GA, et al. Neuropathologic outcome of mild cognitive impairment following progression to clinical dementia. Arch. Neurol. 2006;63:674–681. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.5.674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Leon WC, et al. J. Alzheimer's Dis.: JAD. 2010. A novel transgenic rat model with a full Alzheimer's-like amyloid pathology displays pre-plaque intracellular amyloid-beta-associated cognitive impairment; pp. 113–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zimmer ER, Parent MJ, Cuello AC, Gauthier S, Rosa-Neto P. MicroPET imaging and transgenic models: a blueprint for Alzheimer's disease clinical research. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37:629–641. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.McKhann G, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–944. doi: 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mullan M, et al. A pathogenic mutation for probable Alzheimer's disease in the APP gene at the N-terminus of beta-amyloid. Nat. Genet. 1992;1:345–347. doi: 10.1038/ng0892-345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Murrell J, Farlow M, Ghetti B, Benson MD. A mutation in the amyloid precursor protein associated with hereditary Alzheimer's disease. Science. 1991;254:97–99. doi: 10.1126/science.1925564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Morris R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods. 1984;11:47–60. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zijdenbos AP, Forghani R, Evans AC. Automatic "pipeline" analysis of 3-D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2002;21:1280–1291. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2002.806283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Thomas BA, et al. The importance of appropriate partial volume correction for PET quantification in Alzheimer's disease. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2011;38:1104–1119. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1745-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pascoal TA, et al. Amyloid and tau signatures of brain metabolic decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2018;45:1021–1030. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3933-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Oppelt A, et al. FISP—a new fast MRI sequence. Electromedica. 1986;54:15–18. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gunn RN, Lammertsma AA, Hume SP, Cunningham VJ. Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. NeuroImage. 1997;6:279–287. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shaw LM, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects. Ann. Neurol. 2009;65:403–413. doi: 10.1002/ana.21610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Toledo JB, Xie SX, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM. Longitudinal change in CSF Tau and Abeta biomarkers for up to 48 months in ADNI. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126:659–670. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1151-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mathotaarachchi S, et al. VoxelStats: A MATLAB package for multi-modal voxel-wise brain image analysis. Front Neuroinform. 2016;10:20. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mazziotta J, et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2001;356:1293–1322. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yeo BT, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 2011;106:1125–1165. doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.MacCallum RC, Austin JT. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annu Rev. Psychol. 2000;51:201–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online8, 23–74 (2003).
- 64.Kievit RA, et al. Distinct aspects of frontal lobe structure mediate age-related differences in fluid intelligence and multitasking. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5658. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All human data used in this study were downloaded online at the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database (adni.loni.usc.edu). The locally processed human brain images (MRI and PET) and the animal data are not publicly available for download, but might be retrieved from the correspondent author on a request.