Skip to main content
NCBI home page
BMC Nephrology logoLink to BMC Nephrology
. 2019 Jun 4;20:202. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1339-5

Catheterization in a patient with end-stage renal disease through persistent left superior vena cava: a rare case report and literature review

Huisi He 1,#, Bingyang Li 1,#, Yiyi Ma 2,#, Yuqiang Zhang 2, Chaoyang Ye 2, Changlin Mei 2, Shengqiang Yu 2, Bing Dai 2,✉, Yawei Liu 2,✉
PMCID: PMC6549367  PMID: 31164092

Abstract

Background

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a common vena cava malformation, and drains blood into the right atrium via the dilated coronary sinus in most cases. It is usually asymptomatic and detected incidentally during invasive procedures or imaging. Whether the hemodialysis catheters can be placed in PLSVC is still controversial now (Stylianou et al. Hemodial Int 11:42-45, 2007).

Case presentation

Here we report a rare case of catheterization through PLSVC in an end-stage renal disease (ESRD) male patient whose PLSVC connected with pulmonary vein with insufficient blood flow eventually. Among the other 28 cases included in the literature review, 16 cases were non-tunneled catheter and 12 cases were cuffed, tunneled catheter and most of them could provide adequate blood flow.

Conclusion

PLSVC is a rare malformation and mostly asymptotic, we believe that PLSVC drains blood into the right atrium with enough inner diameter and blood flow can serve as an alternative site for conventional dialysis access. However, the feasibility of hemodialysis catheterization through it and measures to avoid serious complications are still needed to be discussed.

Keywords: Persistent left superior vena cava, Hemodialysis catheter, Case report

Background

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC), known as the residual left superior vena cava, is the most common type of vena cava malformations despite its low incidence. In most cases, PLSVC is clinically asymptomatic due to the lack of hemodynamic abnormalities and is almost always found in invasive procedures or imaging.

Reliable and high-quality vascular access which can provide adequate extracorporeal blood flow is a prerequisite for hemodialysis and serves as a crucial factor for prognosis. Non-cuffed and cuffed, tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheter are both preferred choices for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who have an urgent need for hemodialysis, especially when arteriovenous fistula or graft are both unavailable.

The presence of PLSVC brings difficulties and risks for central venous catheterization. Whether the hemodialysis catheters can be placed in PLSVC is controversial until now. Here we report a rare case of hemodialysis catheterization in a patient with ESRD through PLSVC, but it ended with insufficient blood flow compared to the previous case reports.

Case presentations

A 54-year-old hemodialysis patient with a history of multiple central venous catheterizations, arteriovenous fistula, and graft operations was admitted to our unit for the creation of permanent vascular access. After initial screening, an arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/arteriovenous graft (AVG) was deemed not possible due to exhausted vasculature of both arms, and a cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheter was optioned to be chosen. The right internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization was attempted under sterile conditions, but the guide-wire could not be advanced more than 10 cm, and the right IJV catheterization was abandoned due to consideration of potential critical stenosis. The left IJV was catheterized with a cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheter (14.5F, 36 cm, Palindrome) thereafter without any complication.

Postoperative chest radiograph showed that the catheter was descending straight through the left border of the mediastinum (Fig. 1). Further computed tomography angiography (CTA) of central veins after removal of the hemodialysis catheter, with three-dimensional reconstruction of vessels, revealed the initial segment of the left IJV was stenosed and an abnormal vessel on the left of the aorta drained blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein. The vascular malformation of PLSVC was confirmed (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Postoperative chest radiograph showed the location of the cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheter and its abnormal path

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

CTA of central vein and three-dimensional reconstruction confirmed PLSVC which connected with pulmonary vein

Finally, we replaced a cuffed, tunneled catheter through the right IJV after DSA-guided balloon dilatation of right brachiocephalic venous stenosis. It was removed due to decreasing blood flow and catheter-related bloodstream infection 3 years later. Thereafter, a new cuffed, tunneled catheter was placed in the left IJV which went through right superior vena cava into the right atrium under digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (Fig. 3). Until now, this patient has conducted hemodialysis through the catheter with blood flow around 300 mL/min for 4 years.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

The chest radiograph of the cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheter used now

Discussion and conclusion

PLSVC is the most common kind of congenital malformations in the thoracic vessels. It was first reported by Edwards et al. [1] in 1950 and the latest studies show that the incidence of this deformity is about 0.1–0.5% of the total population, [2] of which about 10% of patients with congenital heart abnormalities [3, 4].

Human left superior vena cava originates in the third week of the embryonic period, and then the left anterior cardinal vena cava gradually atrophies with embryonic development and finally degenerates into the ligament of Marshall. If the degeneration is not complete, then the remains of a pipeline structure after birth is PLSVC. Some clinicians advocate that it associates with chromosomal aberration, congenital cardiac defect, and extracardiac anomalies might be detected at follow-up [5]. Schummer [6] raised the most recognized classification of the supracardial venous system according to anatomic relationships of superior vena cava and its adjacent (Table 1, Fig. 4). The patient in our case had a type IIIa venous malformation.

Table 1.

Schummer’s classification of superior vena cava

Types Characteristics
I Normal superior vena cava anatomy
II Only PLSVC exists, without the right superior vena cava
IIIa PLSVC and the right superior vena cava exist, with left brachiocephalic vein between both sides
IIIb PLSVC and the right side of the superior vena cava, withoutleft brachiocephalic vein between both sides
Open in a new tab

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Schummer’s classification of superior vena cava in dorsal view (SVC: Superior vena cava PLSVC: Persistent left superior vena cava LBV: Left brachiocephalic vein CS: Coronary sinus IVC: Inferior vena cava)

Ninety-two precent % of PLSVC patients drain blood into the right atrium via the dilated coronary sinus, [7] most of them are asymptomatic and have no hemodynamic abnormalities. In most cases, it’s hard to be detected by physical examination and it is always noticed accidentally during imaging or the process of intravascular invasive procedure such as pacemaker implantation, PICC, cardiac electrophysiological examination and central venous hemodialysis catheterization. However, some patients still show abnormal sinus rhythm or bradycardia at the very beginning. In these cases, the patients might undergo pacemaker implantation because of sick sinus syndrome resulting from histological abnormalities caused by an enlarged coronary sinus [8, 9]. Another 8% of patients drain blood into left atrium may have obvious clinical cyanosis due to the left to right shunt, and those people always suffer from septal defect, ventricular septal defect or other cardiovascular malformations [10, 11]. This patient’s PLSVC drains blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein (Type D in Zhu’s classification of PLSVC), but he doesn’t have congenital heart disease and cyanosis which may result from low shunt flow volume (Table 2, Fig. 5) [12].

Table 2.

Zhu’s classification of PLSVC

Types Characteristics
A PLSVC drains blood to right atrium via coronary sinus
B PLSVC drains blood to right atrium via coronary sinus with partial right-to-left shunt
C PLSVC drains blood to left atrium directly with right-to-left shunt
D PLSVC is directly connected to left pulmonary vein (coronary sinus absent)
Open in a new tab

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Zhu’s classification of PLSVC in dorsal view (SVC: Superior vena cava PLSVC: Persistent left superior vena cava CS: Coronary sinus LA: Left atrium IVC: Inferior vena cava)

Can persistent left superior vena cava be used in the hemodialysis catheterization? After a careful literature review, totally 28 cases with hemodialysis catheterization through PLSVC were reported. The details of case reports with hemodialysis catheterization through PLSVC are shown in Table 3. Among them, 16 cases were non-tunneled catheter and 12 cases were cuffed, tunneled catheter. Most of them were type III PLSVC with indwelling catheters in left IJV. The previous history of pacemaker implantation was also notable in the latest case we reported [39]. Among these cases, most operations were completed safely, and hemodialysis catheters met the needs of hemodialysis during the maximum 32-month dwelling time. There was one case reported severe hypotension, bradycardia, and cardiac-respiratory arrest after three times successful hemodialysis. Although the correlation between catheterization and arrhythmia was uncertain, the catheter was removed after the fourth hemodialysis was performed [17]. In another case, rare complication pericardial effusion and bilateral pleural effusions were confirmed by chest computed tomogram since short of breath developed 24 h after catheterization and hemodialysis. This catheter was removed by the cardiothoracic surgeon for safety [28]. In a recently released case, stagnation of blood flow and thrombus formation was found due to a large catheter caliber-to-vein ratio, which resulted in catheter removal after 4 h [38]. Our case is the first hemodialysis patient with PLSVC that drains blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein, which leads to insufficient blood flow after catheterization. From this rare case and previously reported cases, we raise some concerns about catheterization in PLSVC.

Table 3.

The details of case reports with hemodialysis catheterization through PLSVC

Authors & Year Study type Patient’s Gender & Age The reason of catheterization The type of SVC The type of catheter Catheter Function & Blood Flow (ml/min) The duration of catheterization The outcome of catheter or patient Intraoperative & postoperative complications Additional anatomical variations
Kim et al., 1999 [13] Letter to editor 28, male ESRD Type IIIb Non-tunneled (left SCV) Good, 200 mL/min Unclear but carried out 3 times Catheter was removed when AVF matured Not observed Not observed
Paulter et al., 1999 [14] Case report 83, male ESRD due to DM and HTN Unclear Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Unclear Not observed Not observed
Radovic et al., 2002 [15] Letter to editor 31, female ESRD due to membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis Type IIIa Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, 220 mL/min 4 weeks Catheter was removed when AVG was cannulated Not observed Not observed
De la Prada et al., 2002 [16] Case Report 45, male ESRD due to DM Type III (a or b) Cuffed, tunneled (right IJV) Good, 250 ml/min More than 3 months Unclear Not observed Not observed
Dionison et al., 2003 [17] Case report 61, female ESRD due to DM Type IIIb Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear but carried out 4 times Catheter was removed because of severe arrhythmia Severe hypotension and bradycardia, cardiac-respiratory arrest A solitary pelvic kidney
Kuppusamy et al., 2004 [18] Case report 75, female AKI due to ischemic tubular necrosis Type IIIb Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Unclear Not observed Not observed
Stylianou et al., 2007 [19] Case report 80, female ESRD due to DM Type III (a or b) Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 1 month Catheter was removed when AVG was cannulated Not observed Anomalous pulmonary vein drainage
Orija et al., 2009 [20] Case report 72, male ESRD Type III (a or b) Cuffed, tunneled (right IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Unclear Not observed Not observed
Parreira et al., 2009 [21] Case report 50, unclear ESRD Unclear Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Unclear Not observed Not observed
Jang et al., 2009 [22] Case report 68, male ESRD Unclear Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, 230 mL/min Unclear Unclear Not observed Not observed
Lim et al., 2010 [23] Case report 58, male ESRD due to DM Unclear Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 5 months Catheter was removed when AVF matured Not observed Aortic coarctation
Sriramnaveen et al., 2010 [24] Letter to editor 50, male ESRD due to HTN Type IIIa Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Unclear Not observed Not observed
Messina et al., 2011 [25] Case report Unclear ESRD with complete obstruction of central venous vessels Type III (a or b) Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 15 months Catheter was replaced with a longer one at 12 months Not observed Not observed
Kute et al., 2011 [26] Case report 45, female ESRD due to DM and HTN Type III (a or b) Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV) Good, 250 mL/min 2 months Catheter was removed when AVF matured Not observed Not observed
Wong et al., 2013 [27] Case report Unclear, male ESRD due to systemic lupus erythematosus Type IIIa Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 3 months Patient died of pancytopenia and infective endocarditis Not observed Not observed
Balasubramanian et al., 2014 [28] Case report 57, male AKI Unclear Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 4 h Catheter was removed by cardiothoracic surgeon Breathlessness, bilateral pleural effusions, subcutaneous, emphysema, pericardial effusion Not observed
Lui et al., 2014 [29] Case report 61, male ESRD due to DM Unclear Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 6 months Catheter was removed when AVF matured Not observed Not observed
Kukavica et al., 2014 [30] Letter to editor 71, male ESRD Unclear Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 4 months Patient died of cerebrovascular stroke, cardio-respiratory insufficiency and cardiac arrest The failed first two insertions and mild initial resistance during the third insertion Not observed
Dubey et al., 2014 [31] Letter to editor 35, male ESRD (waiting for another renal transplantation) Type II Non-tunneled (right IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Unclear Not observed Not observed
Jaffer et al., 2015 [32] Case report 58, female AKI due to acute tubular necrosis Type IIIa Cuffed Tunneled (right IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Unclear Not observed Horseshoe kidney
Sahutoglu et al., 2016 [33] Case reports 80, male ESRD (acute peritonitis due to peritoneal dialysis) Type II Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, 300–350 mL/min 3 months Catheter was removed when AVF matured Not observed Not observed
35, male ESRD due to DM and HTN Type II Non-tunneled (Right IJV) Good, 300–350 mL/min 2 months Catheter was removed when AVF matured Not observed Not observed
Zhou et al., 2016 [34] Case report 63, female ESRD Unclear Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 9 months Unclear Not observed Not observed
Ricciardi et al., 2017 [35] Case report 33, female ESRD Unclear Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear 32 months Unclear Not observed Cleft lip and palate, uterus bicornis, congenital left hip dislocation and a left inferior vena cava
Boodhun et al., 2018 [36] Case Report 28, male ESRD Type IIIb Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Catheter was removed when permanent left femoral catheter was placed Not observed Not observed
Anvesh et al., 2018 [37] Case Report 35, male ESRD due to HTN Type IIIb Non-tunneled (left IJV) Good, Unclear Unclear Unclear Not observed Not observed
Kawasaki et al., 2018 [38] Case report 66, female ESRD due to DM and HTN Unclear Non-tunneled (left IJV) Removed before use 4 h Thrombus formation in the catheter lumen when removed Not observed Not observed
He et al., 2018 [39] Case report 88, female ESRD due to HTN Type II Cuffed, tunneled (right IJV) Good, 220 mL/min 16 months Patient died of gastrointestinal hemorrhage Not observed Not observed
Open in a new tab

ESRD end-stage renal disease, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes, AVF arteriovenous fistula, SCV subclavian vein, IJV internal jugular vein, PLSVC persistent left superior vena cava

Firstly, the operators should raise awareness of cardiovascular abnormalities during the central venous access. For suspected patients with positive symptoms and signs, echocardiography should perform as soon as possible. The direct signs are the existence of the duct-like structure and the blood flow spectrum in the left upper part of the chest, and the indirect sign is the dilated coronary sinus [40]. In addition, unexplained tricuspid atrial systolic murmur and right atrial enlargement should arouse attention. Localized bullae in front of the mediastinum in chest radiography is an important sign of early screening and echocardiography can be the primary screening method. Cardiac catheterization procedure is the gold standard for the diagnosis of PLSVC. However, its invasiveness, radioactivity prohibits clinical use. Thoracic enhanced CTA might serve as an alternative.

Secondly, left IJV is a preferred cannulation site for hemodialysis catheterization through PLSVC, especially for those patients with absent right superior vena cava. Traditionally, right IJV cannulation is generally preferred in hemodialysis patients due to its straight path directly into the superior vena cava and fewer complications compared with other positions. Nevertheless, in these PLSVC without right superior vena cava cases, since the right IJV and subclavian vein drains blood into PLSVC via the right brachiocephalic vein, traditional right IJV cannulation may encounter difficulties and acute complications normally met in left IJV cannulation. Central vein perforation, pneumothorax, and artery puncture all have been reported in previous cases, which mostly caused by force during the operation without the sense of cardiovascular malformations. So, whenever any resistance is met with forwarding the guidewire or the peel-away sheath, do not push by force, what you need is to pull it out and reassess vascular condition (especially for PLSVC with absent right superior vena cava). Detailed history survey, preoperative imaging screening, intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance, and postoperative chest radiograph assessment for suspected patients are priority points to avoid serious complications.

Thirdly, whether a hemodialysis catheter can be placed in PLSVC is still controversial until now [19]. Our case proved that the PLSVC which rarely drains blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein or left-to-right shunt cannot be used to conduct hemodialysis because of obvious hemodynamic abnormalities and insufficient blood flow. In most cases, PLSVC flowed back into the right atrium through the coronary venous sinus. Although few complications were reported in the placement of a non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter through PLSVC (Table 3), hemodynamic changes after indwelling catheters in those patients potentially may lead to angina pectoris, arrhythmia, stroke, cardiac arrest due to coronary sinus irritation. In severe cases, it may threaten the patients’ life [19, 22, 41]. Some nephrologists believe that PLSVC is relatively thin and the blood flow is not enough to maintain long-term hemodialysis, and the locally generated turbulence may increase the probability of thrombosis and arrhythmia. However, if the diameter of PLSVC and blood flow were sufficient, with stably flowed back through the coronary venous sinus into the right atrium, it was feasible to dwell a hemodialysis catheter in PLSVC for long-term hemodialysis. We believe that after an accurate assessment of intrathoracic vessels including the inner diameter of PLSVC via preoperative imaging, a PLSVC can serve as an alternative site for conventional dialysis access.

However, the location of the catheter tip remains to be elucidated. The tip of the cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheter is normally positioned within the right atrium or at the junction of superior vena cava and right atrium. For PLSVC patients, the right atrium is inaccessible and the placement of catheter tip in the left superior vena cava that is close to the coronary sinus might cause arrhythmia, so we think that the lower left superior vena cava with adequate blood flow and negative cardiac effect might be an optimal choice.

PLSVC is a rare and asymptotic malformation, so the early detection and diagnosis before hemodialysis catheterization are quite difficult. Detailed history survey, echocardiography and preoperative imaging screening are the priority points to identify suspect patients. Rarely, the PLSVC which drains blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein or left-to-right shunt should be excluded. During the surgery, intraoperative ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance are strongly recommended if available. Performing catheterization carefully, position it properly and do not push it by force may help to avoid serious complications. We believe that PLSVC drains blood into the right atrium with enough inner diameter and blood flow can serve as an alternative site for conventional dialysis access. Besides, the preferable location of the catheter’s tip with minor hemodynamic effect remained to be determined.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patient and his family for their support.

Funding

This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81370844). The funding sources had no role in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data collected from this patient were obtained from the Changzheng Hospital and are available in this paper.

Abbreviations

AVG

arteriovenous graft

CTA

Computed tomography angiography

DSA

Digital subtracted angiography

ESRD

End-stage renal disease

IJV

Internal jugular vein

PLSVC

Persistent left superior vena cava

Authors’ contributions

HSH, BYL, YYM, YWL and BD were all directly involved in the care of the patient. HSH and BYL acquired the data necessary for analysis and wrote the initial draft of the paper. YYM, YQZ, CYY, CLM and SQY contributed in data analysis and interpretation. BD and YWL were responsible for revising the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript prior to submission. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The patient received all information regarding this case report. Written informed consent for publication in BMC Nephrology was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Huisi He, Email: huisi_he@yeah.net.

Bingyang Li, Email: leo-521@163.com.

Yiyi Ma, Email: czmayiyi@163.com.

Yuqiang Zhang, Email: czzhangyuqiang@163.com.

Chaoyang Ye, Email: czyechaoyang@163.com.

Changlin Mei, Email: czmeichanglin@163.com.

Shengqiang Yu, Email: czyushengqiang@163.com.

Bing Dai, Phone: +8613817619261, Email: czdaibing@smmu.edu.cn.

Yawei Liu, Phone: +86-13816545985, Email: lyw1025@163.com.

References

  • 1.Edwards JE, DuSHANE JW, Alcott DL, Burchell HB. Thoracic venous anomalies. III. Atresia of the common pulmonary vein, the pulmonary veins draining wholly into the superior vena cava. AMA Arch Pathol. 1951;51(4):446–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ghaye B. Comparative Interpretation of CT and Standard Radiography of the Chest. Medical radiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. Imaging of hila and pulmonary vessels; pp. 165–194. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sheikh AS, Mazhar S. Persistent left superior vena cava with absent right superior vena cava: review of the literature and clinical implications. Echocardiography. 2014;31(5):674–679. doi: 10.1111/echo.12514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cheng Z, Deng H, Cheng K, Chen T, Gao P, Fang Q. Implantation of a pacemaker in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava and absence of right superior vena cava. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):e53–e54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Du L, Xie H-N, Zhu Y-X, Li-Juan L, Peng R, Zheng J. Fetal persistent left superior vena cava in cases with and without chromosomal anomalies. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(8):797–802. doi: 10.1002/pd.4380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schummer W, Schummer C, Fröber R. Persistent left superior vena cava and central venous catheter position: clinical impact illustrated by four cases. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25(3–4):315–321. doi: 10.1007/s00276-003-0138-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arat N, Sokmen Y, Golbasi Z. Persistent left superior vena cava with absent right superior vena cava and coronary sinus dilation mimicking a Paracardiac mass. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(4):492–493. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Umar F, Alzuwam A, Osman F. Dual-chamber pacemaker in persistent left superior vena cava. Heart. 2011;97(16):1360. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.James TN, Marshall TK, Edwards JE. De subitaneis mortibus. XX. Cardiac electrical instability in the presence of a left superior vena cava. Circulation. 1976;54(4):689–697. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.54.4.689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yener N, Sürücü HS, Dogan R, Aldur MM. A case with dextrocardia, ventricular septal defect, persistent left superior vena cava and drainage of the great cardiac vein into the left internal thoracic vein. Surg Radiol Anat. 2001;23(3):205–206. doi: 10.1007/s00276-001-0205-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Demirtürk OS, Gümüs A, Ülger MH, Güvener M. An absent right superior vena cava with a persistent left superior vena cava combined with the presence of a ventricular septal defect in a pediatric patient: implications for surgical correction. Turkish Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012;20(3):638–640. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2012.125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhu X. Basic Illustrations For Cardiac Surgery. 2. Beijing: Peking union medical college press; 2010. pp. 257–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim YO, Choi EJ, Jeon HK, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava detected by hemodialysis catheterization. Nephron. 1999;83(1):87–88. doi: 10.1159/000045478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pautler S, Muirhead N. Soft-tissue images. Persistent left superior vena cava. Can J Surg. 1999;42(1):7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Radovic M, Masulovic D, Djukanovic L. Displacement of hemodialysis catheter in persistent left superior caval vein. Ren Fail. 2002;24(3):383–385. doi: 10.1081/JDI-120005374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.de la Prada FJ, Sastre M, Forteza JF, Morey A, Munar MA, Alarcón A. Persistence of the left superior vena cava discovered during the implantation of a hemodialysis catheter. Nefrologia. 2002;22(2):199–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dionisio P, Borsetti C, Valenti M, et al. Knowledge of the anomalies of the big central veins reduces the morbidity during the cannulation for hemodialysis: description of a case of persistent left superior vena cava and revision of literature. J Vasc Access. 2003;4(1):25–31. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2008.3680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuppusamy TS, Balogun RA. Unusual placement of a dialysis catheter: persistent left superior vena cava. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(2):365–367. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stylianou K, Korsavas K, Voloudaki A, et al. Can a left internal jugular catheter be used in the hemodialysis of a patient with persistent left superior vena cava? Hemodial Int. 2007;11(1):42–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2007.00152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Orija A, Rajan J, Degenhard A. An interesting case: bilateral superior vena cava in a patient with end stage renal disease. Semin Dial. 2009;22(2):209–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Parreira LF, Lucas CC, Gil CC, Barata JD. Catheterization of a persistent left superior vena cava. J Vasc Access. 2009;10(3):214–215. doi: 10.1177/112972980901000315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jang YS, Kim SH, Lee DH, Kim DH, Seo AY. Hemodialysis catheter placement via a persistent left superior vena cava. Clin Nephrol. 2009;71(4):448–450. doi: 10.5414/CNP71448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lim TC, H’ng MW. Persistent left superior vena cava: a possible site for haemodialysis catheter placement. Singap Med J. 2010;51(12):e195–e197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sriramnaveen P, Krishna Kishore C, Sainaresh VV, et al. Placement of dual lumen non-cuffed dialysis catheter into persistent left superior vena cava. Clin Nephrol. 2010;73(1):81–82. doi: 10.5414/CNP73081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Messina M, Morale W, Viglianesi A, et al. Atypical placement of hemodialysis catheters in patients with complete and irreversible obstruction of central venous vessels. J Vasc Access. 2011;12(1):21–27. doi: 10.5301/112972981101200101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kute VB, Vanikar AV, Gumber MR, Shah PR, Goplani KR, Trivedi HL. Hemodialysis through persistent left superior vena cava. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2011;15(1):40–42. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.78223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wong KW, Yap FL. Persistent left superior vena cava diagnosed during haemodialysis catheter placement - a case report. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68(4):360–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Balasubramanian S, Gupta S, Nicholls M, Laboi P. Rare complication of a dialysis catheter insertion. Clin Kidney J. 2014;7(2):194–196. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfu006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lui WL, Kuang LE, Ren LC, Renaud CJ. Safe maintenance of left-sided chronic accesses in a persistent left superior vena cava in the presence of normal coronary sinus calibre. Nephrology (Carlton) 2014;19(2):116–118. doi: 10.1111/nep.12174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kukavica N, Resic H, Spasovski G. Atypical vascular access for dialysis patients via persistent left superior vena cava. Ther Apher Dial. 2014;18(1):112–113. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dubey PK, Kumar N, Sanjeev OP. Misplacement of a right internal jugular hemodialysis catheter in a persistent left superior vena cava. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26(1):84–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jaffer F, Chandiramani V. Concomitant persistent left superior vena cava and horseshoe kidney. Case Rep Nephrol. 2015;2015:178310. doi: 10.1155/2015/178310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sahutoglu T, Sakaci T, Kara E, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava: two case reports and a review from nephrologists’ perspective. Hemodial Int. 2016;20(3):369–377. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou Q, Murthy S, Pattison A, Werder G. Central venous access through a persistent left superior vena cava: a case series. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(5):e143–e147. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ricciardi B, Ricciardi CA, Lacquaniti A, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava and partially left inferior vena cava: a case report of a dangerous central venous catheterization. J Vasc Access. 2017;18(5):e66–e69. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Boodhun M, Mohammad N, Adnan A, Wan Ghazali WS. Catheterisation of a persistent left superior vena cava. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018. 10.1136/bcr-2018-224355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Anvesh G, Raju SB, Rammurti S, Prasad K. Persistent left superior vena cava in a hemodialysis patient. Indian J Nephrol. 2018;28(4):317–319. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_245_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kawasaki T, Tanaka H, Oba M, Takada M, Tanaka H, Suda S. Persistent left superior vena cava with thrombus formed in the catheter lumen 4 h after dialysis catheter placed. CEN Case Rep. 2018;7(1):158–161. doi: 10.1007/s13730-018-0317-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.He Huisi, Li Bingyang, Gao Xiang, Li Hua, Ye Chaoyang, Mei Changlin, Yu Shengqiang, Liu Yawei, Dai Bing. A dialysis patient with isolated persistent left superior vena cava. Kidney International. 2019;95(4):1000. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yuce M, Kizilkan N, Kus E, Davutoglu V, Sari I. Giant coronary sinus and absent right superior vena cava. Vasa. 2011;40(1):65–67. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Granata A, Andrulli S, Fiorini F, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava: what the interventional nephrologist needs to know. J Vasc Access. 2009;10(3):207–211. doi: 10.1177/112972980901000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data collected from this patient were obtained from the Changzheng Hospital and are available in this paper.

Articles from BMC Nephrology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES