Skip to main content
Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group logoLink to Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group
. 2011 Apr 26;20(3):269–275. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00031

Functional status measurement in COPD: a review of available methods and their feasibility in primary care

Janwillem WH Kocks 1,2,*, Guus M Asijee 3,4, Ioanna G Tsiligianni 1,2,5, Huib AM Kerstjens 1,6, Thys van der Molen 1,2
PMCID: PMC6549845  PMID: 21523316

Abstract

Aims

Guidelines advocate that improvement in functional status should be a major goal in COPD treatment. Many tools are available to assess aspects of functional status. This review aims to categorise systematically the available tools based on their construct (i.e. what the tool intends to measure) and to rate the tools for use in the primary care setting.

Methods

PubMed was searched with the keywords ‘functional status’ or ‘physical capacity’ or ‘functional capacity’ and ‘COPD’. All tools were categorised and rated on their measurement properties, feasibility, and usage in primary care COPD patients. The tools were divided into four constructs — functional capacity, functional performance, functional reserve, and capacity utilisation — and used the following modes of measurement: laboratory tests; semi-laboratory tests; field tests; and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

The PubMed search resulted in 364 articles. Thirty-two tools were identified and rated.

Conclusions

In primary care, the 6-minute walking distance test is the most reliable semi-laboratory functional capacity test, but is not very practical. The pedometer is the best functional performance field test. The Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea questionnaire and the functional status domain of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) are the best patient-reported outcome tools to assess functional performance.

Keywords: COPD, management, primary care, functional status, physical capacity, performance, measurement, tools

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (548.1 KB).

Footnotes

GMA is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, The Netherlands.


Articles from Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group are provided here courtesy of Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited

RESOURCES