Skip to main content
Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group logoLink to Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group
. 2011 Apr 20;20(3):291–298. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00033

Change in asthma and COPD prescribing by Italian general practitioners between 2006 and 2008

Mario Cazzola 1,*, Andrea Segreti 1, Germano Bettoncelli 2, Luigino Calzetta 1, Claudio Cricelli 2, Franco Pasqua 3, Paola Rogliani 1
PMCID: PMC6549849  PMID: 21509419

Abstract

Aims

To explore the trend in prescribing of drugs classified within the R03 therapeutic pharmacological subgroup (drugs for obstructive airway diseases) of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification.

Methods

Comparison of GP-collected data on physician-patient contacts and drug prescriptions for asthma and COPD in 2006 and 2008.

Results

Compared to 2006, in 2008 patients with COPD were prescribed more long-acting bronchodilators; use of tiotropium increased, whilst use of long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and short-acting antimuscarinic agents decreased. However, 55.9% of patients in 2006, and 47.8% in 2008, received an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), mainly as a LABA/ICS fixed combination inhaler. Compared to 2006, in 2008 there were increased prescriptions of LABA/ICS fixed combination inhalers for asthma, but only 54.5% of all prescriptions included an ICS. This could explain the large use of short-acting β2-agonists, a marker of poor asthma control. Remarkably, LABA/ICS fixed combination inhalers were prescribed more frequently in COPD than in asthma.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that adherence to guidelines is still low. Patients with asthma and COPD are undertreated by Italian GPs, with a trend to a change in COPD prescribing likely driven by new scientific information.

Keywords: asthma, COPD, general practitioners, treatment, prescribing, Italy, bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroid

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (550.8 KB).

Footnotes

The authors have no significant conflicts of interest with any company or organisation whose products or services are discussed in this article.


Articles from Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group are provided here courtesy of Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited

RESOURCES