Skip to main content
Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group logoLink to Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group
. 2011 Nov 15;20(4):448–451. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00096

Knowledge of asthma management by general practitioners in Karachi, Pakistan: comparison with international guidelines

Nizar Bhulani 1,*, Saima Lalani 1, Aziez Ahmed 1, Yahya Jan 1, Urooba Faheem 1, Ayub Khan 1, Zahra Samani 1, Wahaj Aman 1, Faria Bhatti 1, Omar Hayat 1, Sarah Saleem 2
PMCID: PMC6549893  PMID: 22083538

Abstract

Background

Suboptimal management of asthma by general practitioners (GPs) can lead to poor health outcomes

Aims

To assess the management of common asthma presentations by GPs using the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines as a comparative tool.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Karachi, Pakistan. Of 250 GPs approached, 192 completed a self-administered questionnaire regarding pathology, key history points, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of asthma.

Results

Overall, 28.6% of GPs had adequate knowledge of the core concepts of asthma, while only 10.4% had adequate practice in asthma management. About 78% of GPs had inadequate knowledge of pathology, about 90% had inadequate knowledge of medications to be used, and 63% had inadequate knowledge regarding diet restrictions. Knowledge regarding symptoms not usually associated with asthma was adequate, as was knowledge regarding non-pharmacological management (79% each). Practices regarding asthma diagnosis were good (99.0%). However, practices regarding acute exacerbations and patients who wish to exercise were inadequate in 85.9% and 82.8% of GPs, respectively.

Conclusions

The majority of GPs had poor knowledge and practice of asthma. We recommend initiation of programmes to improve their knowledge and practices.

Keywords: asthma, knowledge, management, guidelines, general practitioners, Karachi (Pakistan)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (284.8 KB).

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.


Articles from Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group are provided here courtesy of Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited

RESOURCES