Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2019 Apr 24;9(6):1807–1813. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400037

Evolution of Antibiotic Synthesis Gene Clusters in the Streptomyces globisporus TFH56, Isolated from Tomato Flower

Gyeongjun Cho *, Youn-Sig Kwak *,†,1
PMCID: PMC6553541  PMID: 31018944

Abstract

Streptomyces species are known to produce various bioactive metabolites that can prevent plant diseases. Previously, the Streptomyces strain TFH56 was found to inhibit the gray mold pathogen, Botrytis cinerea, in tomato flower. In this study, the genome sequence of strain TFH56 was acquired using the Pacific Biosciences RS II platform. Three linear sequences (7.67 Mbp in total) were obtained. Based on average nucleotide identity, strain TFH56 was classified as Streptomyces globisporus, which is consistent with the presence of a linear chromosome and linear plasmids. Moreover, as with other examples of S. globisporus, the genome of strain TFH56 included a caryolan-1-ol synthase gene, a conprimycin synthetic gene cluster, and a lidamycin synthetic gene cluster

Keywords: Streptomyces complete genome, linear chromosome, bioactive compound


Members of the genus Streptomyces are Gram-positive bacteria that resemble filamentous fungi. Streptomyces spp. typically inhabit soil, but are also known to interact with plants and animals. The complex life cycle of Streptomyces includes spore germination, vegetative hyphal growth, and programmed cell death in vegetative hyphae accompanying the growth of aerial spore-bearing hyphae (Yagüe et al. 2013). The genomes of Streptomyces spp. have large amounts of G + C content, and some species contain linear chromosomes and plasmids (Bentley et al. 2002; Ikeda et al. 2003; Li et al. 2016). Streptomyces spp. are well known as producers of numerous bioactive compounds. According to Bérdy (2012), in 2010 roughly 33,500 bioactive compounds had been isolated from organisms, and 10,400 of these were reported in Streptomyces spp. This finding suggests that interactions between Streptomyces spp. and other organisms have affected the expression of biosynthetic gene clusters and the evolution and diversity of secondary metabolites. Streptomyces spp. have been recognized to interact with >500 other species (Euzeby 2008), and, because of its diversity, the genus Streptomyces has been considered as a great potential source of new bioactive compounds. Some Streptomyces strains have been identified as antagonists of plant pathogens (Taechowisan et al. 2005; Cha et al. 2016; Kwon et al. 2018). In one study, Streptomyces strain TFH56 was isolated from tomato flowers in Jinju, Republic of Korea. This strain was found to be symbiotic with its host in a metagenome study, and showed outstanding antagonism against Botrytis cinerea—a causal pathogen of gray mold in tomato (Kwon et al. 2018).

The aims of the present study were to identify the known Streptomyces species that is related most closely to strain TFH56, to identify genes associated with the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds in this strain, and to clarify the taxonomy and diversity of these genes. These aims were accomplished through complete genome sequencing, followed by the assessment of average nucleotide identity (ANI) with whole genomes of other Streptomyces spp., and comparison of the biosynthetic genes in strain TFH56 with their homologs in other Streptomyces spp.

Materials and Methods

Genome sequencing and identification

Genome sequencing for strain TFH56 was conducted with the Pacific Biosciences RS II platform of Macrogen Inc. (Daejeon, Republic of Korea). The same platform was used to acquire the complete genome of Streptomyces globisporus strain S4-7 (Kim et al. 2019). Sequence reads were assembled with Canu (version 1.7), and the assembled sequences were polished with the Arrow algorithm in SMRT link (version 5.1.0). The Arrow polish was based on aligned subread BAM files derived from converted bax.h5 files; these served as the raw data files provided by the platform. The genome sequence was annotated via the RASTtk pipeline (Brettin et al. 2015) on the RAST web server (version 2.0; http://rast.nmpdr.org/). The RASTtk pipeline was set as the default, and it functioned by turning on domain bacteria and automatically fixed error options. To identify the species of strain TFH56, 16S rRNA sequences of Actinobacteria were analyzed for maximum likelihood after MUSCLE alignment in MEGA X (version 10.0.5). Furthermore, the genome sequence was compared with previously reported genomes from other Streptomyces spp. with Pyani (version 0.2.8)—a Python 3 module that can calculate ANI with MUMmer (version 3.23). In this study, 24 complete genome-sequenced strains of Actinobacteria were analyzed. The Ubuntu 18.04 shell commands of Pyani with MUMmer were noted in the Pyani heatmap described in the Supplemental Data. To confirm the ANI results, genome sequences were aligned and visualized with dot plots using DECIPHER (version 2.10.0).

Comparison of bioactive compound biosynthetic gene clusters

Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in strain TFH56 were identified with the bacterial version of antiSMASH 4.1.0 (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/). Homologous regions on each genome were identified using NCBI Blastn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). These gene clusters were compared with their homologs in S. globisporus via sequence alignment with DECIPHER. The homologous regions on each genome were identified using NCBI Blastn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

Visualization

Almost all figures were created with ggplot2 (version 3.1.0), gplots (version 3.0.1.1), and DECIPHER in R. The R code is described in detail in Supplemental Material, File S1. The completed figures from R were edited with respect to font size and type, and layout.

Data availability

Sequence data are available at GenBank; the accession numbers are listed in Table 1. Strains are available upon request. Supplemental material available at FigShare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.8030795.

Table 1. Streptomyces globisporus TFH56 genome assembly and annotation data.

Attribute Chromosome pTFSG1 pTFSG2 Total
Number of bases 7,488,586 127,820 50,115 7,666,521
Number of assembled reads 16,130 411 54 16,595
Circular No No No
G + C content 71.6% 69.5% 67.9% 71.5%
CDS 6991 120 61 7172
tRNA 65 1 0 66
rRNA 18 0 0 18
Accession number CP029361 CP029362 CP029363

Results and Discussion

This study was designed to acquire a whole genome sequence for strain TFH56, which was isolated from tomato flower, to classify this strain within the genus Streptomyces, and to identify genes in strain TFH56 that are homologous to sequences associated with the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds in other Actinobacteria genomes. The acquired genome sequence was assembled in three contigs totaling 7.67 Mbp with 71.5% G + C content, 7172 CDS, 66 tRNA, and 18 rRNA (Figure 1 and Table 1). In evolutionary terms, TFH56 was closest to S. globisporus in terms of 16S rRNA (Figure 2). ANI calculations performed with MUMmer indicated that the genome of strain TFH56 had 96.11% sequence similarity with that of S. globisporus C-1027, and 99.99% similarity with that of S. globisporus S4-7 (Cha et al. 2016; Kim et al. 2019), which was isolated from strawberry rhizosphere (Figure 3). Unexpectedly, Kitasatospora was closely related to Streptomyces in the analysis of ANI and 16S rRNA, both of which were associated with the former classification of Kitasatospora albolonga as Streptomyces albolongus (Labeda et al. 2017). Moreover, consistent with the linear chromosome and two linear plasmids (pTFSG1 and pTFSG2) identified in this study, linear chromosomes and plasmids have been reported for S. globisporus (Li et al. 2016). In strain TFH56, the plasmids had less G + C content than did the chromosome (Figure 1 and Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Genome map of Streptomyces globisporus TFH56. The outermost open ring shows the linear chromosome and linear plasmids. The innermost open ring shows the GC ratio, calculated from 10,000 bp. The remaining two open rings indicate CDS, rRNA, and tRNA on each strand.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Evolutionary history tree for the 16S rRNA sequence, inferred using the Tamura-Nei mode and maximum likelihood method. The tree involved 24 strains of Actinobacteria, and its sequences are ∼1500 bp. Taxonomically, TFH56 is related most closely to Streptomyces globisporus.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Average nucleotide identity based on MUMmer (ANIm) identification and alignment of 21 Streptomyces strains and three Actinobacteria members. The lower left heatmap shows ANIm identity. The trees show similarity according to ANIm identity scores. The upper right subplots are dot plots of whole genome alignments. Black dots represent same-direction alignments, and red dots represent reverse-direction alignments.

antiSMASH predicted 27 secondary metabolite gene clusters in the genome of strain TFH56 (Table 2). Caryolan-1-ol synthase was identified in cluster 9, and a thiopeptide sequence associated with conprimycin biosynthesis in S. globisporus S4-7 (Cha et al. 2016) was identified in cluster 15. Lidamycin biosynthesis genes were also detected in cluster 27. S. globisporus S4-7 is known to produce the antifungal compounds conprimycin (Cha et al. 2016) and caryolan-1-ol (Cho et al. 2017), and S. globisporus C-1027 is known to produce the antitumor agent lidamycin (originally called C-1027) (Hu et al. 1988; Liu et al. 2002; Li et al. 2016). Lidamycin biosynthesis gene sequences could not be found in other Streptomyces spp., and sequences associated with caryolan-1-ol and conprimycin biosynthesis could be found only among close relatives of S. globisporus based on the ANI phylogeny.

Table 2. Secondary metabolite gene clusters in THF56.

Cluster Type From (bp) To (bp) Most similar known cluster
The following clusters are from record chromosome
 Cluster 1 T1pks-Nrps 66,088 117,817 Daptomycin biosynthetic gene cluster (7% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 2 T3pks 208,321 249,373 Tetronasin biosynthetic gene cluster (11% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 3 Melanin 287,733 298,206 Istamycin biosynthetic gene cluster (4% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 4 Bacteriocin-T1pks-Nrps 495,294 568,024 SGR PTMs biosynthetic gene cluster (100% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 5 Terpene 622,086 648,659 Hopene biosynthetic gene cluster (69% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 6 Bacteriocin 1,229,256 1,240,782
 Cluster 7 T1pks-Nrps 1,269,703 1,347,182 Phosphinothricin biosynthetic gene cluster (6% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 8 Siderophore 1,544,907 1,559,623
 Cluster 9 Terpene 1,952,004 1,973,011
 Cluster 10 Ectoine 2,096,983 2,107,357 Pristinamycin biosynthetic gene cluster (23% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 11 Lantipeptide 2,332,022 2,354,832 AmfS biosynthetic gene cluster (100% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 12 T1pks-Nrps 2,427,242 2,481,916 Enduracidin biosynthetic gene cluster (8% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 13 Lantipeptide-Butyrolactone 3,047,239 3,105,744 Labyrinthopeptin A1, A3/labyrinthopeptin A2 biosynthetic gene (40% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 14 Lassopeptide 3,205,276 3,227,973 SRO15-2005 biosynthetic gene cluster (100% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 15 Thiopeptide 4,506,592 4,539,162 Siomycin biosynthetic gene cluster (7% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 16 Nrps 4,781,622 4,826,601 Bottromycin A2 biosynthetic gene cluster (27% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 17 Siderophore 4,937,822 4,949,600 Desferrioxamine B biosynthetic gene cluster (100% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 18 Lantipeptide 5,001,775 5,024,819
 Cluster 19 Ectoine 6,040,034 6,050,432 Ectoine biosynthetic gene cluster (100% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 20 Terpene 6,475,918 6,497,021 Steffimycin biosynthetic gene cluster (19% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 21 Terpene 6,782,807 6,808,026 Isorenieratene biosynthetic gene cluster (85% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 22 T3pks 7,102,494 7,143,612 Herboxidiene biosynthetic gene cluster (6% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 23 Nrps 7,185,040 7,270,761 Griseobactin biosynthetic gene cluster (100% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 24 Terpene-Nrps 7,290,141 7,356,887
 Cluster 25 Butyrolactone 7,380,909 7,391,850 Coelimycin biosynthetic gene cluster (16% of genes show similarity)
 Cluster 26 Terpene 7,431,928 7,457,471 Isorenieratene biosynthetic gene cluster (100% of genes show similarity)
The following clusters are from pTFSG1
 Cluster 27 T1pks-Nrps 16,475 112,894 Lidamycin biosynthetic gene cluster (93% of genes show similarity)

The sequences of these biosynthetic genes were compared among 10 strains in ANI species-similarity order (Figure 4). The caryolan-1-ol synthase sequence in strain TFH56 comprised 978 bp. This sequence was identical to that in strain S4-7, but differed by 24 bp from the sequence in strain C-1027. Streptomyces griseus NBRC 13350, K. albolonga YIM 101047, and Streptomyces fulvissimus DSM 40593 all had similar caryolan-1-ol synthase sequences (Figure 4C). Based on the antiSMASH analyses of CDS structure (Figure 4, D and E), which produced results consistent with the ANI results, the conprimycin biosynthesis sequence in strain TFH56 was 99–100% similar to the sequence in strain S4-7 (Table S1), and was also similar to the homologous sequences in strain C-1027, S. griseus, K. albolonga, and S. fulvissimus (Figure 4, A and D). The homolog of the S. globisporus lidamycin biosynthetic cluster in strain TFH56 was located in pTFSG1. This finding corresponded to a previous report that this cluster is located in the linear plasmid SGLP1 in strain C-1027 (Li et al. 2016). The lidamycin cluster in strain TFH56 differed from that in strain S4-7 in the 0–25 and >65 kbp regions (Figure 4, B and E). However, the lidamycin CDS structure in strain TFH56 was similar to that in strain C-1027, with the exception of the regulator gene, which differed by roughly 22 kbp in the most similar sequence (Figure 4E and Table S2). These results indicate that genes involved in the biosynthesis of caryolan-1-ol, conprimycin, and lidamycin are unique to S. globisporus and its closest relatives among sequenced Streptomyces strains (Figure 4 and Figure S1). This finding could improve our understanding of the diversity and evolution of biosynthetic gene clusters among plant probiotic Streptomyces spp. strains.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Dot plots of aligned secondary metabolite related sequences and comparisons of their CDS, performed with antiSMASH. (A and D) C-1027 lidamycin synthetic gene cluster and homologs. (B and E) S4-7 conprimycin synthetic gene cluster and homologs. (C) Caryolan-1-ol synthase. All axes at dot plots are lengths of DNA sequences. Black and red diagonals in the upper right block correspond to forward and reverse strands, respectively. In the lower left block, the gradient from green to blue to magenta indicates alignment from the highest to the lowest score. Strain or species axis order depends on the ANI results. In (D and E), each filled block indicates a CDS.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (PJ013250) and by the Technology Development Program for Agriculture and Forestry, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Republic of Korea (project no. 315004-5).

Footnotes

Supplemental material available at FigShare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.8030795.

Communicating editor: R. Kulathinal

Literature Cited

  1. Bentley S. D., Chater K. F., Cerdeño-Tárraga A. M., Chalis G. L., Thomson N. R., et al. , 2002.  Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3 (2). Nature 417: 141–147. 10.1038/417141a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bérdy J., 2012.  Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are now and where we are heading. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 65: 385–395 (erratum: J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 65: 441). 10.1038/ja.2012.27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brettin T., Davis J. J., Disz T., Edards R. A., Robert A., et al. , 2015.  RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep. 5: 8365 10.1038/srep08365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cha J. Y., Han S., Hong H. J., Cho H., Kim D., et al. , 2016.  Microbial and biochemical basis of a Fusarium wilt-suppressive soil. ISME J. 10: 119–129. 10.1038/ismej.2015.95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cho G., Kim J., Park C. G., Nislow C., Weller D. M., et al. , 2017.  Caryolan-1-ol, an antifungal volatile produced by Streptomyces spp., inhibits the endomembrane system of fungi. Open Biol. 7: 170075 10.1098/rsob.170075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Euzeby J. P., 2008.  Genus Streptomyces List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Available at: http://www.bacterio.net/streptomyces.html. Accessed: January 18, 2019.
  7. Hu J. L., Xue Y. C., Xie M. Y., Zhang R., Otani T., et al. , 1988.  A new macromolecular antitumor antibiotic, C-1027. I. Discovery, taxonomy of producing organism, fermentation and biological activity. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 41: 1575–1579. 10.7164/antibiotics.41.1575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ikeda H., Ishikakwa J., Hanamoto A., Shinose M., Kikuchi H., et al. , 2003.  Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the industrial microorganism Streptomyces avermitilis. Nat. Biotechnol. 21: 526–531. 10.1038/nbt820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim D. R., Jeon C. W., Shin J. H., Weller D. M., Thomashow L., et al. , 2019.  Function and distribution of a lantipeptide in strawberry Fusarium wilt disease-suppressive soils. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 32: 306–312. 10.1094/MPMI-05-18-0129-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kwon Y., Lee J. T., Kim H. S., Jeon C., Kwak Y. S., 2018.  Comparative tomato flower and pollinator hive microbial communities. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 125: 115–119. 10.1007/s41348-017-0090-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Labeda D. P., Dunlap C. A., Rong X., Huang Y., Doroghazi J. R., et al. , 2017.  Phylogenetic relationships in the family Streptomycetaceae using multi-locus sequence analysis. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 110: 563–583. 10.1007/s10482-016-0824-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li X., Lei X., Zhang C., Jiang Z., Shi Y., et al. , 2016.  Complete genome sequence of Streptomyces globisporus C-1027, the producer of an enediyne antibiotic lidamycin. J. Biotechnol. 222: 9–10. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu W., Christenson S. D., Standage S., Shen B., 2002.  Biosynthesis of the enediyne antitumor antibiotic C-1027. Science 297: 1170–1173. 10.1126/science.1072110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Taechowisan T., Lu C., Shen Y., Lumyong S., 2005.  Secondary metabolites from endophytic Streptomyces aureofaciens CMUAc130 and their antifungal activity. Microbiology 151: 1691–1695. 10.1099/mic.0.27758-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yagüe P., López-García M. T., Rioseras B., Sánchez J., Manteca A., 2013.  Pre-sporulation stages of Streptomyces differentiation: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 342: 79–88. 10.1111/1574-6968.12128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data are available at GenBank; the accession numbers are listed in Table 1. Strains are available upon request. Supplemental material available at FigShare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.8030795.

Table 1. Streptomyces globisporus TFH56 genome assembly and annotation data.

Attribute Chromosome pTFSG1 pTFSG2 Total
Number of bases 7,488,586 127,820 50,115 7,666,521
Number of assembled reads 16,130 411 54 16,595
Circular No No No
G + C content 71.6% 69.5% 67.9% 71.5%
CDS 6991 120 61 7172
tRNA 65 1 0 66
rRNA 18 0 0 18
Accession number CP029361 CP029362 CP029363

Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES