Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:149–152. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318322

Characterization of the central sulcus in the brain in early childhood

Niharika Gajawelli 1, Sean Deoni 2, Holly Dirks 3, Douglas Dean 4, Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh 5, Siddhant Sawardekar 6, Andrea Ezis 7, Yalin Wang 8, Marvin D Nelson 9, Olivier Coulon 10,*, Natasha Lepore 11,*
PMCID: PMC6554208  NIHMSID: NIHMS977540  PMID: 26736222

Abstract

Characterization of the developing brain during early childhood is of interest for both neuroscience and medicine, and in particular, is key to understanding what goes wrong in neurodevelopmental disorders. In particular, the cortex grows rapidly in the first 3 years of life, and creating a normative atlas can provide a comparison tool to diagnose disorders at an early stage, thereby empowering early interventional therapies. Zooming in on specific sulci may provide additional targeted information, and notably, an understanding of central sulcus growth can provide important insight on the development of laterality. However, there currently do not exist any atlases of specific changes in sulci as the brain grows. In this pilot study, we explore regional differences in the depth of the central sulcus between two and three year old infants using brain magnetic resonance images.

I. Introduction

The brain grows rapidly from birth to childhood, reaching 95% of its final volume by 6 years of age. Cortical folding begins at the gestational age of 16 weeks in the normal brain, but continues to evolve rapidly into early childhood [16]. Sulci are major landmarks of the cortex, and it has been shown that their depth can be a marker of functional specificities [6] or of developmental pathologies [15]. The patterns of these folds are impacted by genetic as well as environmental factors [2,14]. While there exists a lot of variation in the cortex between individuals, some consistent patterns are found in the cortical folds of healthy individuals, and it has been shown that subtle abnormalities in the folding pattern are associated with cognitive disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, ADHD, Williams’ syndrome and autism [9,17]. For example, [17] found that autistic and control children exhibit strikingly different relationships with age in terms of changes in brain morphology; the central, intraparietal and frontal medial sulci showed a significant and consistent pattern of abnormalities across different geometrical indices, such as the length and depth of the sulcus.

Understanding healthy cortical folding in early childhood is important to establish a baseline for normal cortical maturation. A few studies delve into cortical folding and growth in infancy [12, 16], however, the study of normal cortical development using MRI in early childhood is still at its early stages. Until recently, the potential for more accurate, quantitative in vivo diagnoses was hampered by the lack of large systematic studies of normal development from in vivo data, with which to compare abnormal cases. Several large databases of healthy children’s brain MRI are currently being created, including for example the NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain Development [1], the Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics Study [20], and the Advanced Baby Imaging Lab database that we will use here [14]. All of these databases are being funded to answer different questions about normal brain development, but in spite of all the new data coming in, cortical sulcal development is still poorly understood. Here we focus specifically on the evolution of the central sulcus, taking advantage of the large early childhood structural MRI dataset acquired as part of the Baby Imaging Lab (BIL) study of normal brain development [19]. This work inscribes itself as part of a larger study that we are currently undertaking to determine the development of major sulci in children 0–4 years old using the BIL dataset.

II. METHOD

A. Data

The brain volumes were chosen randomly from the Advanced Baby Imaging Lab’s healthy children database. In this pilot study, the data used consists of T1-weighted brain MRIs of 2 and 3 year olds subjects, with 8 and 9 subjects in each group respectively. More precisely, the dataset used consists of high-resolution MP-RAGE images of healthy children, with inclusion criteria including: singleton birth between 37 and 42 weeks gestation with no abnormalities on fetal ultrasound and no reported history of neurological events or disorders in the infant. Additional details on the data acquisition can be found in [7, 8]. Each subject or their guardian was informed of the goals of the study and signed a formal consent. The studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Brown University. All data was de-identified.

B. Processing

The brain volumes were first skull stripped using BrainSuite [18] and then intensity corrected using the N4 intensity correction in ANTs [3]. We then resampled the brain volumes to 1×1×1mm3 space and performed tissue segmentation using the BrainVisa Morphologist pipeline (http://brainvisa.info) [11]. Histogram analysis was tuned manually in some cases to achieve optimum results. After tissue segmentation and surface modeling, the pipeline produces a graph that contains meshes of each of the cortical sulci. A sulcal parameterization process was then applied to the left and right central sulci of each subject and depth was measured at each position along the sulcus, which resulted in a depth curve for each central sulcus, as described in [5, 6]. This method detects the dorsal and ventral extremities and provides a smooth isometric parameterization that, for every point on the sulcus, indicates its relative position between the two extremities [5]. For each position within [0 100], the depth at this position is estimated by measuring the length of the corresponding isoparametric lines. The resulting sulcal depth profiles have shown good inter-subject reproducibility for morphological statistical studies [4,6]. We computed the mean and standard deviation of the sulcal depth in the 2 and 3 year old subjects. To investigate the differences in the central sulcus depth between the two and three year old brains, we conducted a Mann Whitney test at each of the 101 positions. We then corrected for multiple comparisons via permutation testing.

III. RESULTS

The figures below contain the mean and standard deviation of the central sulcus of the 2 and 3 year old datasets for the left and right central sulci. Although the standard deviation is high, we see that the general shape is maintained and is similar to that seen in adults [6]. We also see in Fig. 2 that the right central sulcus of the 3 year old group has less variation in its depth profile.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean profile of the depth curves of the central sulcus of 3 year old data. Top: Left central sulcus, Bottom: Right central sulcus

The Mann-Whitney test performed to compare the distribution between the 2 age groups yielded significance (p<0.05) in 11 locations between positions 67 to 82 in the right central sulcus. The same test yielded significance at 6 positions between 77 and 94 for the left central sulcus. The plots of the p-values are shown in Fig. 3. The overall p-value for the right central sulcus is 0.0077 and for 0.0262 for the left central sulcus.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The p-values plotted for each sulcal position. The green line represents the p-value of 0.05 and the red line represents p = 0.01. Top: Left Central Sulcus, Bottom: Right central sulcus.

IV. DISCUSSION

As with the adult data in [6], in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, we see a steep incline in the depth profile from position 1 to around position 20, where we see a first peak. There is then a gradual increase in the depth profile until the next peak at around position 61, after which the curves decline steeply. The average depth curve at age 3 is indeed very much like the adult one. However the curve at age 2 is not. After an increase to the first peak (superior peak) [6], it keeps on increasing to the second one (inferior peak). Both of these points are located in the vicinity of the somatotopic upper limb representation in the primary sensorimotor cortex, according to the approximate Talairach z-coordinates [6].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mean profile of the depth curves of the central sulcus of 2 year old data. Top: Right central sulcus, Bottom: Left central sulcus

In adults there is a depth minimum between the two peaks, called the ‘Pli de Passage Fronto-parietal Moyen’ or PPFM, which is a buried gyrus that connects the frontal and parietal lobes through the central sulcus. This seems to really start to emerge between the ages of 2 and 3. Hence, our pilot study indicates that the shape of the depth profile is similar to the adult profile even at early ages. The main differences we see between the 2 and 3 year old subjects are in regions 67 to 82, past the inferior peak, towards the sulcal fundus. This is confirmed by testing for multiple comparisons. The entire central sulcus separates the primary motor and primary somatosensory cortices, hence, it is likely that the central sulcus will change as motor functions develop. We will investigate this in further detail adding covariates related to motor skills to better understand this finding. For example, it was is shown in [10] that the middle and deep Mouth and Tongue Area activations are found along the anterior bank of the CS. Language develops rapidly in that age range, hence, it is possible that the differences seen are due to the acquisition of motor skills and development of the tongue between 2 and 3 years of age. In addition, significance in the right central sulcus was higher than on the left, though this may be due to increased variability on the left. More subjects need to be added into the study to confirm these results. We are also in the process of adding earlier ages in order to obtain a picture of early central sulcus development.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank colleagues at CIBORG Lab at CHLA for their support in this project.

Contributor Information

Niharika Gajawelli, USC, Los Angeles.

Sean Deoni, Director of Pediatric Radiology Research, Children’s Hospital Colorado.

Holly Dirks, Brown University.

Douglas Dean, Brown University.

Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh, Brown University.

Siddhant Sawardekar, USC, Los Angeles.

Andrea Ezis, USC, Los Angeles.

Yalin Wang, Faculty in Computer Science and Engineering at Arizona State University.

Marvin D. Nelson, Chairman of the Department of Radiology at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles

Olivier Coulon, CNRS Research Director, Aix-Marseille University.

Natasha Lepore, Faculty at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.

References

  • 1.Evans Alan C the Brain Development Cooperative Group, The NIH MRI study of normal brain development. Neuroimage. 2006;30:184–202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Annett Marian. Genetic and nongenetic influences on handedness. Behavior genetics. 1978;8(3):227–249. doi: 10.1007/BF01072826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Avants Brian B, et al. An open source multivariate framework for n-tissue segmentation with evaluation on public data. Neuroinformatics. 2011;9(4):381–400. doi: 10.1007/s12021-011-9109-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coulon Olivier, et al. Two new stable anatomical landmarks on the Central Sulcus: Definition, automatic detection, and their relationship with primary motor functions of the hand. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE; IEEE; 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Coulon Olivier, et al. Quasi-isometric length parameterization of cortical sulci: application to handedness and the central sulcus morphology. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cykowski Matthew D, et al. The central sulcus: an observer-independent characterization of sulcal landmarks and depth asymmetry. Cerebral Cortex. 2008;18(9):1999–2009. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Deoni Sean CL, Rutt Brian K, Peters Terry M. Synthetic T1-weighted brain image generation with incorporated coil intensity correction using DESPOT1. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2006;24(9):1241–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deoni Sean CL, Rutt Brian K, Peters Terry M. Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2003;49(3):515–526. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dierker Donna L, et al. Analysis of cortical shape in children with simplex autism. Cerebral Cortex. 2013:bht294. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Fesl G, et al. Inferior central sulcus: variations of anatomy and function on the example of the motor tongue area. Neuroimage. 2003;20(1):601–610. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00299-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fischer Clara, et al. Morphologist 2012: the new morphological pipeline of BrainVISA. Human Brain Mapping Conference; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hill Jason, et al. A surface-based analysis of hemispheric asymmetries and folding of cerebral cortex in term-born human infants. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30(6):2268–2276. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hopkins William D, Coulon Olivier, Mangin J-F. Observer-independent characterization of sulcal landmarks and depth asymmetry in the central sulcus of the chimpanzee brain. Neuroscience. 2010;171(2):544–551. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Klöppel Stefan, et al. Nurture versus nature: long-term impact of forced right-handedness on structure of pericentral cortex and basal ganglia. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30(9):3271–3275. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4394-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leroy François, et al. New human-specific brain landmark: The depth asymmetry of superior temporal sulcus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015:201412389. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412389112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li Gang, et al. Measuring the dynamic longitudinal cortex development in infants by reconstruction of temporally consistent cortical surfaces. Neuroimage. 2014;90:266–279. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nebel Mary Beth, et al. Disruption of functional organization within the primary motor cortex in children with autism. Human brain mapping. 2014;35(2):567–580. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shattuck David W, Leahy Richard M. BrainSuite: an automated cortical surface identification tool. Medical image analysis. 2002;6(2):129–142. doi: 10.1016/s1361-8415(02)00054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.http://www.babyimaginglab.com/Home.html
  • 20.http://pingstudy.ucsd.edu/

RESOURCES