Abstract
Background
Despite considerable efforts at developing therapeutic vaccines for cancer, clinical translation of preclinical successes has been challenging, largely due to the difficulty of inducing strong and sustained cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses in patients. Several peptide-based cancer vaccines have failed to show sustainable tumor regression in the clinic, possibly because of a lack of optimization of both the adjuvant and antigen components of the preparations. Here, we aimed to develop and optimize a vaccine format utilizing a synthetic long peptide (SLP) containing the human papilloma virus 16 (HPV16) E7 antigen, with a centrally located defined MHC class I epitope, and evaluate its immunogenicity and efficacy in combination with various adjuvant formulations.
Methods
E731–73 SLP was tested alone or in combination with toll-like receptor (TLR)3, TLR4, TLR7/8 and TLR9 agonists and formulated in oil-in-water (o/w) or water-in-oil (w/o) emulsions to determine a vaccine format inducing a robust CD8 T cell response in murine models. Once a lead vaccine format was determined, we examined its ability to inhibit tumor growth in the murine TC-1 model that expresses HPV16 E7 antigen.
Results
We identified the TLR9 agonist CpG formulated in a squalene-based o/w emulsion as the most potent adjuvant, inducing the expansion of multifunctional antigen specific CD8 T cells with cytolytic potential. We also demonstrated that SLP E731–73 + CpG + o/w emulsion vaccine can provide prophylactic and more importantly, therapeutic benefit in the TC-1 murine tumor model.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that the novel vaccine format E7 SLP + CpG delivered in an o/w emulsion holds potential for the promotion of strong CTL responses and tumor eradication and encourages further development of peptide/adjuvant vaccines in cancer immunotherapy strategies.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5725-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Cancer vaccines, Synthetic long peptides (SLP), Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), Human papilloma virus antigen E7 (HPV E7)
Background
The generation of a durable CD8 T cell response with strong cytolytic function specific to a diverse array of tumor antigen epitopes is the most important immune objective of cancer vaccines. Preclinical development in cancer vaccines has explored several formats that have been proven effective for such an immune outcome. This included DNA plasmid vaccination, dendritic cell (DC)-targeting molecules, whole cell vaccines derived from tumor cells or antigen-loaded DCs, stabilized RNA-based vaccines, and virally-vectored constructs derived from vaccinia, poxvirus, and adenovirus (reviewed in [1, 2]). Peptide-based cancer vaccines have also been under development for many years and vaccination with peptides alone can, at times, show some efficacy and limited tumor regression in pre-clinical models [3]. However, long-lasting suppression of tumor growth has generally been shown to require the formulation of peptide-based vaccines with immune-enhancing adjuvants (reviewed in [4]).
Several potent adjuvants have been developed from the class of compounds known as toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, which mimic pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or conserved pathogen-derived compounds, to activate the host innate immune response. Adjuvant comparison studies have identified synthetic TLR agonists that trigger TLR3, TLR7, and TLR9 as promising adjuvant candidates for cancer vaccines as they mimic the RNA and DNA-based PAMPs dominant in viral challenges, which often lead to strong cytolytic CD8 T cell responses, critical for effective antitumor immunotherapy [5–7]. TLR9 short oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) agonists are most conducive for formulation as they are easy to manufacture, exhibit strong potency in humans [8, 9], and do not require special formulations to protect from degradation [10, 11].
Several adjuvanted peptide vaccines have been tested clinically and although peptide-specific CD8 T cell responses can be detected at low levels, substantial clinical efficacy has been limited [12, 13]. These results may be due to suboptimal formulations using short peptides which lack antigen presenting cell (APC)-activating properties and adjuvants (e.g. Montanide) that are not engineered for favorable MHC class I cross-presentation or improved homing to the draining lymph node [14]. Here, we report that pairing CpG delivered in an o/w emulsion with a 43 amino acid Synthetic Long Peptide (SLP) derived from HPV16 E7 resulted in vigorous CD8 T cell responses characterized by cytokine multifunctionality, establishment of memory populations, and high cytolytic potential. This vaccine format was also curative in a TC-1 tumor model through day 120 and was protective against tumor re-challenge.
Methods
SLP synthesis
SLPs for HPV16 E7 43 amino acid in length were designed so the immunodominant H-2Db-restricted epitope (RAHYNIVTF) was centrally located. HPV16 E731–73 SLP sequence: SSEEEDEIDGPAGQAEPDRAHYNIVTFCCKCDSTLRLCVQSTH. SLPs were synthesized to > 90% purity by New England Peptide and determined to have endotoxin levels < 0.2 EU/mg by Endosafe endotoxin reader (Charles River).
Vaccines
Peptides (3–20 μg) were delivered in PBS pH 7.2 (Gibco) or in formulation with AddaVax (InvivoGen) or Montanide ISA720 (Seppic) which comprised 50% v:v of the 100 μl dose administered per mouse. Addavax formulations vaccine components were mixed by vortexing for 20 s, and Montanide formulations were mixed using two syringes linked by a 3-way luer lock valve. Adjuvant doses were selected based on recommended range by manufacturer for use in mice. Adjuvants tested were CpG ODN 2395, poly(I:C), R848 (all InvivoGen) and MPLA (Avanti Polar Lipids).
Immunogenicity studies
Vaccinations were delivered to C57BL/6 J female mice between 6 and 10 weeks of age (Jackson Labs) by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection at the ventral base of the tail on days 0 and 21. Mice were housed in the MedImmune Laboratory Animal Resource facility using microisolator cages using Teklad corncob bedding (Envigo) using a standard 12 h light/dark cycle. All mice were euthanized by CO2 and spleens were harvested. Spleens were processed by GentleMACS (Miltenyi Biotec), washed with 5% FBS-RPMI-1640, and homogenates were centrifugated at 300 x g for 10 min at 4 °C, before performing RBC lysis with ACK Lysing Buffer (Invitrogen) for 2 min at room temperature. All animal studies were performed under the review and approval of the MedImmune Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Flow cytometric assays
Flow cytometry staining was carried out on freshly prepared single cell splenocytes preparations. Splenocytes were cultured for 5 h with 1 μg/mL E749–57 peptide in the presence of 1:1000 GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences). Cells were fixed with BD CytoFix and permeabilized as needed with BD Perm/Wash buffer. Antibodies used for FACS analyses included CD8α (53–6.7), CD62L (MEL-14) CD4 (GK1.5), CD44 (IM7), KLRG1 (2F1), IL-2 (JES6-5H4), IFN-γ (XMG1.2), TNF-α (MP6-XT22); B220 (RA3-6B2), (BD Biosciences); HPV16 E749–57 Dextramer (Immudex). All cell populations were gated on single live cells. For detection of multifunctional CD8 T cells, splenocytes were gated for B220− > CD8+ cytokine+. For detection of T effector memory (TEM) cells, splenocytes were gated for B220− > CD8+ CD44hi dextramer+ > CD62L− KLRG hi.
In vivo cytotoxicity assay
Splenocytes from naïve C57BL/6 J mice were harvested, counted, and divided equally into two groups for labeling as target populations with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (Sigma) at either 10 μM (CFSEhi) or 1 μM (CFSElo). Additionally, splenocytes were washed and pulsed with either 1 μg/mL HPV16-E7 peptide pool (CFSEhi) or an irrelevant EBV-gp100 peptide pool (CFSElo) for 1 h at 37 °C. Peptide pools were 15-mers overlapping by 11 covering the entire sequences of E7 and gp350 and synthesized by Anaspec. Both target cell populations were mixed together at a 1:1 ratio (confirmed by FACS), and 2 × 108 combined target cells in 200 μL were injected by tail vein injection into vaccinated mice. 4 h after cell transfer, recipient mice were sacrificed and spleens harvested. Single cell splenocytes were analyzed by FACS for presence of CFSE-positive target cells. Percent E7-specific killing was calculated by the following formula (1 – (CFSEhi / CFSElo)) × 100.
ELISpot
The ELISpot assay was performed as described in [15], using the mouse IFN-γ ELISpot kit (BD Biosciences) per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody overnight at 4 °C. Splenocytes were stimulated at 5e5 cells/well with 1 μg/mL E749–57 for 24 h at 37 °C. Plates were washed and incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse IFN-γ detection antibody and then streptavidin-HRP. Development of signal occurred by exposure to AEC substrate, then scanning and analysis performed on the AID vSpot Spectrum (Autoimmun Diagnostika).
TC-1 tumor model
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with guidelines established by the MedImmune Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The TC-1 tumor line, syngeneic to C57BL/6 mice, was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Cat # CRL 2785), and maintained in DMEM + 5% FBS + 1% penicillin/streptomycin (all Gibco). Sub-confluent cultured cells were harvested in 10 mM EDTA, washed, and resuspended in DMEM + 10 mM HEPES (Gibco) for injection. 2e4 viable TC-1 cells in a volume of 30 μL were implanted subcutaneously into the left hind footpad. Mice were randomly assigned to treatment or control groups at this point. Tumor growth was evaluated by direct measurement with calipers, beginning at day 10. Bi-directional measurements were collected every 2–4 days, and tumor volume calculated using the formula: volume = (length x width2)/2 [16]. Mice were euthanized when the primary tumor exceeded 1000 mm3 in accordance with ethical guidelines. For vaccination, 3–20 μg E7 SLP was formulated with 20 μg CpG ODN 2395 in AddaVax and PBS in a total volume of 100 μL. Vaccinations were administered s.c. into the ventral surface of the base of tail. At various time points after vaccination, spleens and/or tumor tissue were harvested from sacrificed mice (selections were randomized when subsets of vaccinated groups were euthanized), processed through GentleMACS, and analyzed for immune cell subsets by FACS. In some cases, mice were re-challenged with TC-1 tumor and implanted with 2e4, 5e4, or 1e5 TC-1 cells in the right footpad on day 120.
Histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Select tumor samples were collected via blunt dissection of footpad tissue, immersion-fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 12–24 h, processed routinely, and embedded in paraffin. Briefly, 4 μm sections were collected on Plus-charged slides, and immunohistochemistry was performed on a Dako Autostainer-Plus Slide Stainer using an anti-Mouse CD8α (Clone 4SM15, eBioscience) at 1:5000 dilution. Detection was performed using goat anti-rat (Jackson Immuno) at 2 μg/mL, followed by Vectastain Elite ABC HRP Standard Peroxidase Kit (Vector Laboratories), visualized with ImmPACT DAB Peroxidase (Vector Laboratories), and counterstained with Gills #2 Hematoxylin (Richard-Allen Scientific). Rat IgG2aĸ (BD Pharmingen) at 1:5000 served as isotype control. Rat spleen was used as the positive control tissue. All samples were examined by a board-certified pathologist for detection of CD8+ cells within the tumor center.
Statistical analysis
The one-way ANOVA model with heterogeneous within group variance was used for comparisons between groups and p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. The log-rank test is used for comparison of survival curves. SAS 9.3 was used for the analysis.
Results
Combining synthetic long peptide with CpG induces an expansion of antigen specific CD8+ T cells
The generation of a robust and durable CTL response with strong cytolytic function against tumors is a critical objective for a successful cancer vaccine. To achieve this, we developed a HPV16 E7 SLP which incorporated a centrally located H-2Db CD8 epitope RAHNIVTF and tested it in combination with either the TLR9L CpG, TLR4L MPL, TLR3L Poly(I:C) or TLR7/8 L R848 to determine the most potent TLR agonist to induce expansion of antigen specific CD8 T cells. Mice were immunized s.c. (base of tail) on days 0 and 21 with E7 SLP alone or E7 SLP plus either a dose of TLRL commonly used in murine vaccine studies or a four-fold lower dose of TLRL and expansion of antigen specific CD8 T cells was measured by dextramer staining in the spleens on day 28. Figure 1a shows representative dot plots of E7 dextramer staining and Fig. 1b illustrates that expansion of E7 antigen specific CD8 T cells was optimally promoted by the TLR9L CpG and superior to expansion seen with any of the other TLRLs tested.
SLP combined with CpG and formulated with an oil-in-water emulsion is a superior adjuvant for the induction of antigen specific CD8 T cells
While the results from Fig. 1 show an expansion of antigen specific CD8 T cells when E7 SLP is paired with CpG, a successful therapeutic cancer vaccine likely would need to generate a more robust immune response. While there are many strategies currently investigated to enhance the immunogenicity of vaccines, we explored the use of the two basic types of emulsions, the water-in-oil (w/o) and the oil-in-water (o/w) to deliver our SLP + TLR agonists to enhance vaccine CD8 T cell responses.
To determine the optimal pairing of TLRL, SLP and emulsion that generate a robust expansion of antigen specific CD8 T cells, mice were vaccinated on days 0 and 21 with E7 SLP combined with either TLR9L CpG, TLR4L MPL, TLR3L Poly(I:C) or TLR7/8 L R848 and formulated with either w/o or o/w emulsions and spleens were harvested on day 28 and stained with E7 dextramer. As shown in Fig. 2 E7 SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion resulted in a greater than 10-fold expansion in E7 antigen specific CD8 T cells when compared to the response observed with E7 SLP + CpG + w/o emulsion. The E7-specific CD8 T cell response observed with CpG + o/w emulsion was also significantly higher than that observed with the other TLR-agonist formulated in either the w/o or o/w emulsions.
SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion induces strong cytotoxic T cell responses that demonstrates in vivo killing and establishment of long lasting responses
CD8 T cells responsible for clearing tumors in tumor-bearing mice are characterized by high cytolytic capability and long-lasting durability. To determine the quality of CD8 T cell responses achieved by vaccination with SLP + CpG + o/w or w/o emulsion, we performed an ex vivo stimulation with the E7 peptide RAHNIVTF on splenocytes harvested from the groups of animals previously described in Fig. 2. Representative dot plots of these analyses illustrate the robust polyfunctional TNF-α and IFN-γ production induced by ex vivo stimulation in the E7 SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion groups (Fig. 3a) and the percent of IFN-γ producing CD8 T cells found in the spleens of vaccinated animals clearly demonstrating the superiority of SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion over all other test conditions (Fig. 3b).
To assess the killing capacity of the antigen specific CD8 T cells induced by E7 SLP +/− CpG +/− o/w emulsion we performed an in vivo cytotoxicity study. Naïve splenocytes were loaded with E7 peptides or an irrelevant peptide (EBV gp350), mixed at a 1:1 ratio and transferred to vaccinated animals. Spleens from the mice that received the transferred cells were tracked for the E7 specific cell disappearance 4 h later (Fig. 4). Delivery of E7 SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion led to near 100% deletion of E7+ target cells, demonstrating higher activity than CpG or emulsion alone. We also observed the establishment of a substantial effector memory (CD62Llo KLRG1hi) CD8 T cell population by 7 days post-second vaccination in both PBMCs and spleen (Fig. 5a). This population was E7-specific as it also stained positive for E7 dextramer. To determine the durability of this CD8 T cell population, we sampled E7-specific T cell responses at 3 and 6 months post second vaccination by ELISpot and found antigen-specific responses still detectable at those time points, which were substantially higher in SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion-immunized mice than in mice immunized with SLP + emulsion alone (Fig. 5b).
SLP is superior to minimal epitope peptide for the induction of antigen specific CD8 T cells
Several studies have reported that utilizing SLPs that include flanking residues surrounding the epitope of interest as the antigenic component in vaccines offers superiority over vaccination with short peptides containing only the minimal CD8 determinant alone [17, 18]. To confirm that optimal CD8 T cell-inducing effects were achievable with SLP, we conducted a dose response in mice vaccinated with E7 SLP adjuvanted with CpG + o/w emulsion and compared to mice vaccinated with the same adjuvant formulations containing only the minimal epitope, RAHNIVTF. The SLP form of E7 was far more efficient at inducing the expansion of E7 dextramer-positive CD8 T cells (Fig. 6a) and E7-specific multifunctional CD8 T cells (Fig. 6b) than the RAHNIVTF minimal peptide, even though the RAHNIVTF H-2Db determinant was present at 4.8-fold molar excess in the short peptide formulation when compared to the E7 SLP formulation. Collectively, the data demonstrating high cytotoxic ability and durability of the CD8 T cell response generated with a E7 SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion vaccine supported the testing of this vaccine format in tumor-bearing mice.
Vaccination with SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion provides robust protective effects in mouse TC-1 tumor model
The murine TC-1 syngeneic tumor model which expresses HPV16 E7 antigen was used to determine the potential for tumor growth inhibition induced after vaccination with SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion. TC-1 tumor-bearing mice were immunized under several schedules designed to inform on optimal dosing and timing. All groups received two immunizations two weeks apart. One group was treated prophylactically beginning twenty-one days prior to tumor implantation. The other groups underwent therapeutic vaccination beginning at either day 7 or day 14 post tumor implantation to determine how early vaccination was required to achieve optimal tumor regression. In unvaccinated mice, tumors became palpable at day 14–16 and grew rapidly to a size of 1000–1500 mm3 by day 24–28, when animals were euthanized according to ethical guidelines. Prophylactic vaccination protected 100% of the mice with no evidence for tumor growth through day 120 (Fig. 7). Therapeutic vaccination beginning at day 7 or day 14 post tumor implantation proved to be highly effective with no tumor growth in 9/11 (82%) and 8/11 (73%) of the mice, respectively. These results indicate the high potency of the SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion formulation and indicate that very strong protective responses can be achieved, even when vaccinating relatively late after tumor implantation.
To correlate tumor growth inhibition with antigen specific anti-tumor CD8 T cell activity, we immunized animals with CpG + o/w emulsion, to rule out formulation specific anti-tumor activity, or with SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion and tracked the appearance of E7 dextramer positive CD8 T cells in C57BL/6 mice implanted with TC-1. Mice were immunized on day 14 post tumor implantation when palpable tumor was apparent. Spleen and tumor tissues were analyzed for E7-specific CD8 T cells at the time points indicated in Fig. 8. E7 dextramer positive cells were detectable by day 19 in the spleen and day 21 in the tumor tissue and reached peak numbers around day 24 in the SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion group (Fig. 8a, b). Additionally, we detected a remarkable influx of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the central regions of tumors of SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion vaccinated mice by immunohistochemical staining, beginning at day 21 and peaking by day 27 (Fig. 8c). In the mice treated with the adjuvant only E7-specific CD8 T cell responses were not observed which indicates the requirement for exogenously delivered antigen for the priming of E7-specific CD8 T cells in this model system.
Vaccinated mice are protected from re-challenge with TC-1
To determine whether vaccinated mice experienced long-lasting protection, animals in which no tumor growth was observed were randomized on day 120 after initial tumor implantation and distributed into three new groups. These groups were re-challenged in the right footpad with 2e4 (same as day 0 challenge), 5e4, or 1e5 TC-1 cells (Fig. 9). All mice showed complete resistance to establishment of new tumor, with the exception of one mouse in the 1e5 group that showed tumor outgrowth and was sacrificed at day160. These results demonstrate that after therapeutic vaccination with E7 SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion, full protection can be achieved with up to a 5-fold higher secondary challenge dose of the TC-1 tumor cells.
Discussion
Due to the low immune response generated against most peptide antigens, peptide-based therapeutic vaccines engineered to combat tumors and persistent viral infections must be adjuvanted to promote processing and class I presentation for consequent activation of robust CTL responses. We determined that pairing a tumor antigen peptide with CpG-C 2395 delivered in a squalene-based o/w emulsion was highly effective in promoting CD8 T cell responses in mice that were antigen-specific, long-lasting, multifunctional cytokine-expressing, and functionally cytolytic for target cells. This vaccine also proved particularly effective at conveying antitumor effects in the TC-1 tumor mouse model, greatly increasing survival, promoting tumor regression, and establishing a memory response that prevented tumor growth in animals re-challenged with higher doses of TC-1.
The efficacy of CpG-adjuvanted vaccines to treat established tumors in mice has been reported by other investigators. CpG ODNs or motifs have been combined in many different vaccine formats including: DNA plasmid encoding HPV16-E7 [19], bacteriophage-derived VLPs coupled to Melan-A/MART-1 peptide [20], lipoprotein-conjugated E7 antigen [21], and recombinant Bordetella adenylate cyclase bearing E7 polypeptide [22]. The presence of CpG has improved induction of cytolytic responses and/or tumor regression in each case. In a vaccine format more similar to that described herein, consisting of a 35-mer long peptide based on the HPV16 E7 RAHYNIVTF epitope formulated with CpG alone or with the w/o emulsion Montanide [23], investigators reported full tumor regression of TC-1 flank tumors after two s.c. opposite flank vaccinations at days 10 and 24. However, long-lasting protective responses were not fully evaluated as tumor growth was only recorded up to day 30. Since we observed tumor outgrowth occurring in some vaccinated mice post-day 30, it is unclear whether their vaccination regimen was truly curative. The authors also used 150 μg E7 SLP, while we have found that a much lower dose of 20 μg is very effective if delivered with an o/w squalene-based emulsion formulation, and that this formulation generates CD8 T cell responses of greatly increased magnitude when directly compared to those induced with Montanide.
W/o emulsions such as SEPPIC’s Montanide ISA51 and ISA720 have been used in multiple Phase I/II clinical trials and have shown some degree of efficacy, but also have shown safety signals at higher dose levels [24–26]. Furthermore, w/o emulsions like Montanide or IFA have been found to be suboptimal delivery systems for peptides in models of tumor vaccination as they are responsible for an antigen depot effect which causes CD8 T cells to home to the vaccination site rather than the tumor and to convert to an exhaustion phenotype [14]. On the other hand, pharmacology studies with o/w emulsions like MF59, the chemical composition of which the emulsion AddaVax used in our studies was based from, have demonstrated that the emulsion is rapidly drained away from the injection site and that the half-life of the antigen is not affected (reviewed in [27]). MF59 has been shown to induce strong CD4 T cell responses and has been incorporated into some flu vaccines [28] and recently o/w emulsions have been shown in animal models to generate strong cytotoxic CD8 T cell responses when paired with CpG against viral antigens [29].
Combining TLR agonists with an emulsion delivery vehicle is thought to increase the stability of the agonist as well as to improve antigen uptake and activation of APCs. The improved activity of TLR agonists by incorporation into a squalene-based o/w emulsion formulation has been demonstrated unequivocally with TLR4L. Prominent among this class of adjuvants is GLA-SE, in which the synthetic TLR4 agonist glucopyranosyl lipid A (GLA) is incorporated during the microfluidization process into the resultant squalene-based stable emulsion (SE) [30]. GLA-SE demonstrates clear superiority over GLA delivered either with aluminum salts or in aqueous-soluble micelles [31, 32]. A more limited data set has indicated that CpG combined with emulsion may also show enhanced efficacy [33, 34]. In line with these findings, we found that the equivalent dose of CpG without emulsion is less efficient in the induction of CD8 T cell responses than CpG + o/w emulsion, providing further support for the use of this adjuvant combination. A recent report by Song et al. demonstrated the improved efficacy of CpG when delivered by the novel w/o squalene emulsion PELC [35]. E7 peptide delivered by CpG/PELC resulted in higher E7-specific CD8 T cell induction, in vivo cytolytic activity, and protection in a TC-1 model through day 50, compared to peptide plus either adjuvant components alone [35]. The formulation used in the study was the H-2Db minimal determinant of E7 rather than the SLP, which likely accounts for why we observed higher magnitude CD8 T cell IFN-γ expression, higher cytolytic function, and full protection through day 130 in our study as we demonstrate that the increased ability of SLP to drive CD8 T cell responses when compared to minimal peptides.
Conclusions
Peptide vaccines targeting cancer have not achieved the desired clinical endpoints of robust and broad CTL effects and vigorous antineoplastic activity [12, 13]. Much of this lack of success may be due to suboptimal adjuvant formulations (e.g. Montanide, GM-CSF) and antigen formats that cannot initiate the cross-presentation process in DCs that is vital for the promotion of robust CTL responses critical for antitumor immunity [14]. Peptide vaccines with TLR9-based adjuvants have already demonstrated CD8 T cell-inducing ability in the clinic [8, 36]. The next steps in the evaluation of the SLP + CpG + o/w emulsion should include and evaluation in non-human primates before study in humans. Our data support the further development and optimization of adjuvant formulations that demonstrate a pronounced ability to promote CD8 T cell responses for antitumor applications and as potential components of combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitor agents such as anti-PD-L1.
Additional file
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the staff of the MedImmune Laboratory Animal Resources, Gaithersburg, MD, for their expert handling of animal studies, including Leigh Hostetler, Krystal Nacel, and Alex Alfaro. We acknowledge Al Price and Kuishu Ren for conducting endotoxin assays on peptides.
Funding
This study was sponsored/funded by MedImmune, the global biologics R&D arm of AstraZeneca. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional file 1.
Abbreviations
- CpG-C
Cytosine phosphate Guanine type C
- CTL
cytotoxic T lymphocyte
- FACS
fluorescence-activated cell sorting
- HPV
human papilloma virus
- ICS
intracellular cytokine staining
- O/W
oil-in-water
- ODN
oligodeoxynucleotide
- PD-L1
programmed cell death-Ligand 1
- SLP
synthetic long peptide
- TEM
T effector memory cell
- TLR
toll-like receptor
- W/O
water-in-oil
Authors’ contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SKM JDM MPM SHR. Performed the experiments: SKM JDM RSM JAC. Analyzed the data: SKM JDM LY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RSM. Wrote the manuscript: SKM JDM. Reviewed and edited manuscript: CC SHR. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocols were submitted in writing and approved by the MedImmune Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) in compliance with applicable regulations governing protection of animal in research.
Consent for publication
Not Applicable.
Competing interests
All authors are current or former employees of MedImmune or AstraZeneca.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Sean K. Maynard, Email: Maynards@medimmune.com
Jason D. Marshall, Email: Jason.marshall2@nih.gov
Randall S. MacGill, Email: rmacgill@verizon.net
Li Yu, Email: YuLi@MedImmune.com.
Jennifer A. Cann, Email: CannJ@MedImmune.com
Lily I. Cheng, Email: Chengli@medimmune.com
Michael P. McCarthy, Email: mikecee2@verizon.net
Corinne Cayatte, Email: Cayattec@medimmune.com.
Scott H. Robbins, Email: Robbinss@medimmune.com
References
- 1.Guo C, Manjili MH, Subjeck JR, Sarkar D, Fisher PB, Wang XY. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: past, present, and future. Adv Cancer Res. 2013;119:421–475. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407190-2.00007-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fenoglio Daniela, Traverso Paolo, Parodi Alessia, Kalli Francesca, Zanetti Maurizio, Filaci Gilberto. Generation of more effective cancer vaccines. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2013;9(12):2543–2547. doi: 10.4161/hv.26147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.van der Sluis TC, Sluijter M, van Duikeren S, West BL, Melief CJ, Arens R, van der Burg SH, van Hall T. Therapeutic peptide vaccine-induced CD8 T cells strongly modulate Intratumoral macrophages required for tumor regression. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:1042–1051. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dubensky TW, Jr, Reed SG. Adjuvants for cancer vaccines. Semin Immunol. 2010;22:155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kastenmuller K, Wille-Reece U, Lindsay RW, Trager LR, Darrah PA, Flynn BJ, Becker MR, Udey MC, Clausen BE, Igyarto BZ, et al. Protective T cell immunity in mice following protein-TLR7/8 agonist-conjugate immunization requires aggregation, type I IFN, and multiple DC subsets. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:1782–1796. doi: 10.1172/JCI45416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kaczanowska S, Joseph AM, Davila E. TLR agonists: our best frenemy in cancer immunotherapy. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93:847–863. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1012501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang L, Smith D, Bot S, Dellamary L, Bloom A, Bot A. Noncoding RNA danger motifs bridge innate and adaptive immunity and are potent adjuvants for vaccination. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:1175–1184. doi: 10.1172/JCI0215536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Speiser DE, Lienard D, Rufer N, Rubio-Godoy V, Rimoldi D, Lejeune F, Krieg AM, Cerottini JC, Romero P. Rapid and strong human CD8+ T cell responses to vaccination with peptide, IFA, and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide 7909. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:739–746. doi: 10.1172/JCI23373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Valmori D, Souleimanian NE, Tosello V, Bhardwaj N, Adams S, O'Neill D, Pavlick A, Escalon JB, Cruz CM, Angiulli A, et al. Vaccination with NY-ESO-1 protein and CpG in Montanide induces integrated antibody/Th1 responses and CD8 T cells through cross-priming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:8947–8952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703395104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Agrawal S, Zhao Q. Antisense therapeutics. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1998;2:519–528. doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(98)80129-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kurreck J. Antisense technologies. Improvement through novel chemical modifications. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:1628–1644. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pol J, Bloy N, Buque A, Eggermont A, Cremer I, Sautes-Fridman C, Galon J, Tartour E, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, et al. Trial watch: peptide-based anticancer vaccines. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e974411. doi: 10.4161/2162402X.2014.974411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tan AC, Goubier A, Kohrt HE. A quantitative analysis of therapeutic cancer vaccines in phase 2 or phase 3 trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3:48. doi: 10.1186/s40425-015-0093-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hailemichael Y, Dai Z, Jaffarzad N, Ye Y, Medina MA, Huang XF, Dorta-Estremera SM, Greeley NR, Nitti G, Peng W, et al. Persistent antigen at vaccination sites induces tumor-specific CD8+ T cell sequestration, dysfunction and deletion. Nat Med. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Heeke DS, Lin R, Rao E, Woo JC, McCarthy MP, Marshall JD. Identification of GLA/SE as an effective adjuvant for the induction of robust humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to EBV-gp350 in mice and rabbits. Vaccine. 2016;34:2562–2569. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Carlsson G, Gullberg B, Hafstrom L. Estimation of liver tumor volume using different formulas - an experimental study in rats. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1983;105:20–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00391826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rosalia RA, Quakkelaar ED, Redeker A, Khan S, Camps M, Drijfhout JW, Silva AL, Jiskoot W, van Hall T, van Veelen PA, et al. Dendritic cells process synthetic long peptides better than whole protein, improving antigen presentation and T-cell activation. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:2554–2565. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bijker MS, van den Eeden SJ, Franken KL, Melief CJ, Offringa R, van der Burg SH. CD8+ CTL priming by exact peptide epitopes in incomplete Freund's adjuvant induces a vanishing CTL response, whereas long peptides induce sustained CTL reactivity. J Immunol. 2007;179:5033–5040. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ohlschlager P, Spies E, Alvarez G, Quetting M, Groettrup M. The combination of TLR-9 adjuvantation and electroporation-mediated delivery enhances in vivo antitumor responses after vaccination with HPV-16 E7 encoding DNA. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:473–481. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Goldinger SM, Dummer R, Baumgaertner P, Mihic-Probst D, Schwarz K, Hammann-Haenni A, Willers J, Geldhof C, Prior JO, Kundig TM, et al. Nano-particle vaccination combined with TLR-7 and -9 ligands triggers memory and effector CD8(+) T-cell responses in melanoma patients. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42:3049–3061. doi: 10.1002/eji.201142361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chang LS, Leng CH, Yeh YC, Wu CC, Chen HW, Huang HM, Liu SJ. Toll-like receptor 9 agonist enhances anti-tumor immunity and inhibits tumor-associated immunosuppressive cells numbers in a mouse cervical cancer model following recombinant lipoprotein therapy. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:60. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Preville X, Ladant D, Timmerman B, Leclerc C. Eradication of established tumors by vaccination with recombinant Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase carrying the human papillomavirus 16 E7 oncoprotein. Cancer Res. 2005;65:641–649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van Duikeren S, Fransen MF, Redeker A, Wieles B, Platenburg G, Krebber WJ, Ossendorp F, Melief CJ, Arens R. Vaccine-induced effector-memory CD8+ T cell responses predict therapeutic efficacy against tumors. J Immunol. 2012;189:3397–3403. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miles AP, McClellan HA, Rausch KM, Zhu D, Whitmore MD, Singh S, Martin LB, Wu Y, Giersing BK, Stowers AW, et al. Montanide ISA 720 vaccines: quality control of emulsions, stability of formulated antigens, and comparative immunogenicity of vaccine formulations. Vaccine. 2005;23:2530–2539. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.08.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chianese-Bullock KA, Pressley J, Garbee C, Hibbitts S, Murphy C, Yamshchikov G, Petroni GR, Bissonette EA, Neese PY, Grosh WW, et al. MAGE-A1-, MAGE-A10-, and gp100-derived peptides are immunogenic when combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and montanide ISA-51 adjuvant and administered as part of a multipeptide vaccine for melanoma. J Immunol. 2005;174:3080–3086. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.3080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lawrence GW, Saul A, Giddy AJ, Kemp R, Pye D. Phase I trial in humans of an oil-based adjuvant SEPPIC MONTANIDE ISA 720. Vaccine. 1997;15:176–178. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(96)00150-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.De Gregorio E, Caproni E, Ulmer JB. Vaccine adjuvants: mode of action. Front Immunol. 2013;4:214. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Galli G, Medini D, Borgogni E, Zedda L, Bardelli M, Malzone C, Nuti S, Tavarini S, Sammicheli C, Hilbert AK, et al. Adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine induces early CD4+ T cell response that predicts long-term persistence of protective antibody levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3877–3882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813390106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hensel MT, Marshall JD, Dorwart MR, Heeke DS, Rao E, Tummala P, Yu L, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Sloan DD. Prophylactic herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) vaccines Adjuvanted with stable emulsion and toll-like receptor 9 agonist induce a robust HSV-2-specific cell-mediated immune response, protect against symptomatic disease, and reduce the latent viral reservoir. J Virol. 2017;91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Behzad H, Huckriede AL, Haynes L, Gentleman B, Coyle K, Wilschut JC, Kollmann TR, Reed SG, McElhaney JE. GLA-SE, a synthetic toll-like receptor 4 agonist, enhances T-cell responses to influenza vaccine in older adults. J Infect Dis. 2011;205:466–473. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fox CB, Moutaftsi M, Vergara J, Desbien AL, Nana GI, Vedvick TS, Coler RN, Reed SG. TLR4 ligand formulation causes distinct effects on antigen-specific cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. Vaccine. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Misquith A, Fung HW, Dowling QM, Guderian JA, Vedvick TS, Fox CB. In vitro evaluation of TLR4 agonist activity: formulation effects. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;113C:312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baldwin SL, Bertholet S, Kahn M, Zharkikh I, Ireton GC, Vedvick TS, Reed SG, Coler RN. Intradermal immunization improves protective efficacy of a novel TB vaccine candidate. Vaccine. 2009;27:3063–3071. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.de Cassan SC, Forbes EK, Douglas AD, Milicic A, Singh B, Gupta P, Chauhan VS, Chitnis CE, Gilbert SC, Hill AV, et al. The requirement for potent adjuvants to enhance the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of protein vaccines can be overcome by Prior immunization with a recombinant adenovirus. J Immunol. 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Song YC, Cheng HY, Leng CH, Chiang SK, Lin CW, Chong P, Huang MH, Liu SJ. A novel emulsion-type adjuvant containing CpG oligodeoxynucleotides enhances CD8+ T-cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity. J Control Release. 2014;173:158–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Baumgaertner P, Jandus C, Rivals JP, Derre L, Lovgren T, Baitsch L, Guillaume P, Luescher IF, Berthod G, Matter M, et al. Vaccination-induced functional competence of circulating human tumor-specific CD8 T-cells. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:2607–2617. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional file 1.