Abstract
Natural products represent a rich source for antibiotics addressing versatile cellular targets. The deconvolution of their targets via chemical proteomics is often challenged by the introduction of large photocrosslinkers. Here we select elegaphenone, a largely uncharacterized natural product antibiotic bearing a native benzophenone core scaffold, for affinity-based protein profiling (AfBPP) in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. This study utilizes the alkynylated natural product scaffold as a probe to uncover intriguing biological interactions with the transcriptional regulator AlgP. Furthermore, proteome profiling of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa AlgP transposon mutant revealed unique insights into the mode of action. Elegaphenone enhanced the killing of intracellular P. aeruginosa in macrophages exposed to sub-inhibitory concentrations of the fluoroquinolone antibiotic norfloxacin.
Keywords: Chemical Proteomics, Antibiotics, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Virulence, Natural product
Graphical Abstract

Natural product elegaphenone kills Gram-positive E. faecalis and inhibits virulence of Gram-negative P. aeruginosa. Its intrinsic benzophenone structure was utilized to exploit its cellular targets via chemical proteomics.
Innovative antibacterial drugs are urgently needed to address the current antibiotic crisis. Natural products have been a reliable source and the majority of marketed drugs are based on this class.[1] Looking at current modes of action, a limited number of hot spot targets such as cell wall, nucleotide, and protein biosynthesis have been evolutionarily selected. Furthermore, the constant use of antibiotics has resulted in multiple resistance mechanisms, calling for novel drugs that address unprecedented and resistance-free pathways.[2] An intriguing new perspective for developing next-generation antibiotics calls for the attenuation of the production of toxins, which would decrease severity of infections and minimize the development of resistance.[3] In order to rapidly identify such innovative modes of action, several strategies for target deconvolution are applied. A common method is to select for resistant strains and corresponding sequencing to reveal mutations in the target gene.[4] However, this classical method falls short when it comes to indirect resistance mechanisms (e.g. drug efflux). Moreover, molecules that reduce virulence, but do not kill bacteria are difficult to address via this method. Thus, chemical proteomics, such as activity-based protein profiling (ABPP), have been applied.[5] While some antibiotics, including beta-lactams, covalently modify their target, a large number of natural products bind reversibly.[6] For the latter class, functionalization with a photocrosslinker is required in order to withstand the conditions of mass-spectrometry (MS) based proteomics referred to as affinity-based protein profiling (AfBPP).[7] A major drawback of the corresponding photoprobes is often a drop in biological activity when introducing these modifications onto the parent scaffold. Inspired by a phenotypic screen of synthetic compounds deliberately utilizing the benzophenone photocrosslinker as an active moiety, we searched for antibacterial natural products bearing this core motif.[8] A large fraction of natural antibacterials exhibit phenolic structures including the benzophenone motif-containing elegaphenone (EL), a minimally characterized antibiotic produced by the plant St. John’s Wort, used for diverse medical applications (Figure 1A).[9] Here we show that EL not only kills Enterococcus faecalis, but also attenuates virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AfBPP utilizing the photoreactive core scaffold paired with whole proteome studies provide unique insights into the mode of action. Additionally, combination of EL with subinhibitory concentrations of norfloxacin enhanced killing of intracellular P. aeruginosa by macrophages.
Figure 1:
A) Structures of elegaphenone (EL) and derivatives. B) The amount of extracellular pyocyanin in P. aeruginosaPAO1 upon treatment with elegaphenone and derivatives in a dose-dependent manner. The data is based on two biological experiments with technical triplicates. C) MIC values of elegaphenone derivatives in different pathogenic bacterial strains. Lack of growth inhibition is highlighted in grey. E. coli BW25113 ΔbamBΔtolC is a hyperpermeable E. coli strain.[13]
EL was prepared following a route inspired from the olympicin A synthesis (Scheme S1).[10] For the corresponding probes the alkyne tag was directly appended to the monosubstituted benzene ring in the para position. For this we devised a synthesis of derivatives which bear an alkyne tag (ELP), exhibit a methylated hydroxyl group (ELP2) or lack a hydroxyl group (ELP5) on the adjacent benzene ring (Figure 1A). ELP was synthesized by Friedel-Crafts acylation of p-bromobenzoic acid chloride with trimethoxybenzene followed by Sonogashira coupling with ethynyltrimethylsilane. Demethylation and subsequent bisprotection of two hydroxyl groups allowed the selective incorporation of a geranyl group in the ortho position. Global deprotection under acidic conditions provided ELP in 42% yield (Scheme 1). Probes bearing defunctionalized hydroxy groups were obtained via a similar strategy with slight modifications (Scheme S2, S3).
Scheme 1:
Synthesis of AfBPP Probe ELP. DCM: dichloromethane, RT: room temperature, THF: tetrahydrofuran, DMF: N,N-dimethylformamide, CSA: camphorsulfonic acid.
With the natural product and three probes in hand, we first evaluated the biological activity against representative Gram-positive and Gram-negative reference strains, i.e. E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa, respectively. In line with previous reports, EL exhibited antibiotic activity against E. faecalis as well as other Gram-positive strains, including Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes with MIC values ranging from 5 – 12.5 μM (Figure 1C).[9]
ELP and ELP5 showed comparable potency while ELP2 was completely inactive. None of the compounds inhibited P. aeruginosa growth and even growth of a hyperpermeable strain of Escherichia coli could only be affected by EL at high concentrations. However, given the structural similarity of EL to natural phenolic inhibitors of P. aeruginosa quorum sensing, we tested the compounds against P. aeruginosa toxin production.[11] We decided to monitor the levels of pyocyanin, a toxin important during lung infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients.[12] Satisfyingly, EL and its corresponding probes revealed strong inhibition of pyocyanin production, with IC50 values ranging between 5.5 ± 1.1 and 12.6 ± 1.1 μM (Figure 1B). In addition, EL and ELP5 also reduced pyoverdine levels, another P. aeruginosa toxin, albeit at much higher concentrations (Figure S1A). Interestingly, the benzophenone core scaffold by itself neither inhibited E. faecalis growth, nor reduced P. aeruginosa pyocyanin production, emphasizing the importance of the natural product substitution pattern for activity (Figure S1B).
In order to elucidate the corresponding cellular pathways addressed by EL and analogs, we performed AfBPP utilizing the alkynylated EL photoprobes. E. faecalis bacterial cells were incubated with its closest derivative ELP, irradiated, lysed, and clicked to biotin azide (Figure 2A). The probe-labeled proteome was enriched on avidin beads and peptides were released for LC-MS/MS analysis via tryptic digestion. MS analysis was performed via isotopic dimethyl labeling[14] and the enrichment by ELP was compared to cells treated with DMSO or the inactive probe ELP2. Fumarate reductase (Frd), an enzyme involved in important cellular pathways such as anaerobic respiration,[15] was among the most significant hits (Figure S2). In addition, proteins associated with protein synthesis pathways were significantly enriched including elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and 30S ribosomal protein S2 (RpsB). In order to gain more direct insights into target pathways, we performed whole proteome analysis of ELP treated E. faecalis at sub-MIC concentrations. Interestingly, proteins belonging to the V-type ATP synthase and V-type ATPase complexes, directly associated with Frd-mediated respiration, were consistently up-regulated (Figure S3, S4). By contrast, no direct link to ribosome function could be established which was further corroborated by a lack of activity of EL and derivatives in translation inhibition assays using reconstituted extracts from Enterococcus rivorum,[16] a close homolog of E. faecalis that displays a comparable MIC value (12.5 μM) (Figure S5).
Figure 2:
A) Overall scheme of gel-free affinity-based protein profiling (AfBPP) employing isotope labeling. Avid: Avidin; CC: click chemistry; DM: stable isotope dimethyl labeling. B) and C) Volcano plots of gel-free AfBPP experiment in P. aeruginosa PAO1 treated with 50 μM ELP5 vs. a 10-fold excess of EL or DMSO, respectively (both soluble fraction). Blue dots depict targets that are enriched by ELP5 (criteria: log2-fold enrichment ≥ 2 and -log10(p-value) ≥ 2.5) and competed by EL (criteria: log2-fold enrichment ≥ 2 and -log10(p-value) ≥ 2.5). Green squares denote targets that are enriched by ELP5 but not competed by EL while black dots denote background proteins. For a full list of proteins please refer to supporting information.
We next focused on targets of ELP5 in clinically relevant Gram-negative P. aeruginosa via the above described LC-MS/MS platform. Again, 30S ribosomal protein S2 was strongly enriched, accompanied by the transcriptional regulator AlgP and a probable iron sulfur protein. Competition experiments with an excess of EL in presence of the probe confirmed these proteins as specific targets of the natural product (Figure 2B, 2C, S6). Unlike the study in E. faecalis, EF-Tu could not be detected as significantly enriched. While the function of the iron sulfur protein is largely unexplored, AlgP is known as a histone-like protein that may directly or indirectly regulate alginate gene expression.[17] Recombinant AlgP was also labeled by the probe suggesting direct binding (Figure S7). To further understand AlgP function in more detail, we investigated toxin expression in algP transposon mutants. Two mutants (PW9843 and PW9844) were available in the PAO1 transposon mutant library[18] and confirmed by PCR for the correct insertion (Figure S8A). These insertions occur in a region containing multiple KPPA amino acid repeats that are known to facilitate DNA binding and play an important role for AlgP function.[17a] Of note, while a strong attenuation of pyoverdine and a moderate reduction of pyocyanin levels were observed for PW9844, no significant effect was obtained for PW9843, suggesting that this latter insertion may not fully compromise protein function (Figure S8B, S8C). In addition, dose-response studies with ELP5 revealed a concentration-dependent decrease of pyocyanin levels for PW9843 and, to a lesser extent, also for PW9844 (Figure S8D). In case of pyoverdine, PW9843 exhibited a similar behavior as wild type in response to ELP5 while PW8944 showed almost undetectable expression level in presence or absence of the compound (Figure S8E). Overall, these results indicate that the transposon insertion within PW9844 may completely compromise AlgP function and corresponding toxin expression, more prominently for pyoverdine, compared to the PW9843 mutant. In order to clarify how this is linked to the ELP5 phenotype we selected PW9844 for whole proteome analysis and comparison with compound treated cells. Thus, proteomes of P. aeruginosa PAO1 treated with ELP5 and the PW9844 AlgP transposon mutant were analyzed via label free LC-MS/MS, revealing a striking overall similarity of regulated proteins (Figure S9, S10). Interestingly, pyoverdine biosynthesis proteins as well as MexGHI-OpmD, a known transporter of phenazines, were strongly downregulated in both samples.[19] By contrast, no pronounced changes for pyocyanin biosynthesis enzymes were observed, suggesting that the lower extracellular levels of this toxin may stem from reduced MexGHI mediated transport. Taken together, our proteomic profiles confirm a strong link between compound treatment and impairment of AlgP function. However, the differences in pyoverdine levels of PW9844 and compound-treated wild type cells point towards a more complex regulatory function which needs to be explored in future studies.
Given the importance of P. aeruginosa as a pathogen, we selected this bacterium for further evaluation of the EL treatment potential.[20] Because EL/ELP5 did not possess growth-inhibitory activity on P. aeruginosa (Figure 3A), we investigated if these compounds could be used to potentiate the activity of sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics and thereby facilitate natural bacterial elimination by the host immune system. In vitro infection assays with human THP-1 macrophages demonstrated that the presence of EL or ELP5 enhanced the capacity of sub-inhibitory concentrations of the marketed antibiotic drug norfloxacin to kill intracellular P. aeruginosa (Figure 3B). Furthermore, neither EL nor ELP5 were cytotoxic for THP-1 macrophages and we did not observe adverse effects in Caenorhabditis elegans up to a concentration of 300 μM (Figure S11, S12). Thus, combining EL/ELP5 with an antibiotic can reduce antibiotic doses for the treatment of infection.
Figure 3:
A) Number of viable P. aeruginosa PAO1 cultured in the presence or absence of 50 μM EL or ELP5 for 5 h. Cultures were inoculated with 5 × 105 P. aeruginosa bacteria. B) Intracellular viable P. aeruginosa in human THP-1 macrophages. The number of viable intracellular P. aeruginosa was determined after lysing the infected THP-1 macrophages. Concentration of EL derivatives and norfloxacin was 50 μM and 1.5 μg/mL, respectively. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of the data from three independent experiments. **, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.005; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
In conclusion, we use here the intrinsic photoreactivity of a selected antibacterial natural product with a previously unknown mode of action. In P. aeruginosa the compounds appear to mediate inhibition of toxin production via AlgP binding and downregulation of MexGHI, which is responsible for phenazine transport providing a rational for the observed reduction of extracellular pyocyanin levels. Furthermore, combination of EL with sub-inhibitory concentrations of norfloxacin facilitated the killing of intracellular P. aeruginosa in macrophages. Given the paucity of compounds active against Gram-negative strains, the low toxicity and unique target profile of EL represents an intriguing starting point for further development.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
The work was funded by grants of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SI-1096/10–1 to S.A.S. and WI3285/6–1 to D.N.W.), by the National Science Foundation CHE1755698 (W.M.W.) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences GM119426 (W.M.W.). A.R.C. was supported in part by the CF@LANTA RDP Fellowship Program from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (MCCART15R0). We thank Dr. Klaus Richter for his kind support for C. elegans experiments, Prof. Markus Gerhard for the supply of S. aureus clinical isolates, and Sabine Lehne for excellent technical support.
Footnotes
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD010476. See SI for details.
References
- [1].Rossiter SE, Fletcher MH, Wuest WM, Chem Rev 2017, 117, 12415–12474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Lakemeyer aM., Zhao W, Mandl FA, Hammann P, Sieber SA, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2018, 57, 14440–14475; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Chellat bM. F., Raguz L, Riedl R, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2016, 55, 6600–6626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Dickey SW, Cheung GYC, Otto M, Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017, 16, 457–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Guerillot R, Li L, Baines S, Howden B, Schultz MB, Seemann T, Monk I, Pidot SJ, Gao W, Giulieri S, Goncalves da Silva A, D’Agata A, Tomita T, Peleg AY, Stinear TP, Howden BP, Genome Med 2018, 10, 63–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Evans aM. J., Cravatt BF, Chem Rev 2006, 106, 3279–3301; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Fonovic bM., Bogyo M, Expert Rev Proteomics 2008, 5, 721–730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Bush K, Bradford PA, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Wright MH, Sieber SA, Nat Prod Rep 2016, 33, 681–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Cisar JS, Cravatt BF, J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134, 10385–10388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Sarkisian SA, Janssen MJ, Matta H, Henry GE, Laplante KL, Rowley DC, Phytother Res 2012, 26, 1012–1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Shiu WK, Rahman MM, Curry J, Stapleton P, Zloh M, Malkinson JP, Gibbons S, J Nat Prod 2012, 75, 336–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Rasamiravaka T, Labtani Q, Duez P, El Jaziri M, Biomed Res Int 2015, 2015, 759348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Lau aG. W., Hassett DJ, Ran H, Kong F, Trends Mol Med 2004, 10, 599–606; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Jayaseelan bS., Ramaswamy D, Dharmaraj S, World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 30, 1159–1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].King AM, Reid-Yu SA, Wang W, King DT, De Pascale G, Strynadka NC, Walsh TR, Coombes BK, Wright GD, Nature 2014, 510, 503–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Boersema PJ, Raijmakers R, Lemeer S, Mohammed S, Heck AJR, Nature Protocols 2009, 4, 484–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Ramsey M, Hartke A, Huycke M, in Enterococci: From Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection (Eds.: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y), Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Niemi RM, Ollinkangas T, Paulin L, Svec P, Vandamme P, Karkman A, Kosina M, Lindstrom K, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol 2011, 62, 2169–2173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Konyecsni aW. M., Deretic V, J Bacteriol 1990, 172, 2511–2520; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Deretic bV., Konyecsni WM, J Bacteriol 1990, 172, 5544–5554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Jacobs aM. A., Alwood A, Thaipisuttikul I, Spencer D, Haugen E, Ernst bS., Will O, Kaul R, Raymond C, Levy R, Chun-Rong L, Guenthner D, Bovee D, Olson MV, Manoil C, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100, 14339–14344; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Held K, Ramage E, Jacobs M, Gallagher L, Manoil C, J Bacteriol 2012, 194, 6387–6389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Wolloscheck D, Krishnamoorthy G, Nguyen J, Zgurskaya HI, ACS Infect Dis 2018, 4, 185–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Parkins aM. D., Somayaji R, Waters VJ, Clin Microbiol Rev 2018, 31, e00019–00018; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Cheong bH. S., Kang CI, Wi YM, Kim ES, Lee JS, Ko KS, Chung DR, Lee NY, Song JH, Peck KR, Am J Med 2008, 121, 709–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




