Abstract
The ribosome, the largest RNA-containing macromolecular machinery in cells, requires metal ions not only to maintain its three-dimensional fold but also to perform protein synthesis. Despite the vast biochemical data regarding the importance of metal ions for efficient protein synthesis and the increasing number of ribosome structures solved by X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy, the assignment of metal ions within the ribosome remains elusive due to methodological limitations. Here we present extensive experimental data on the potassium composition and environment in two structures of functional ribosome complexes obtained by measurement of the potassium anomalous signal at the K-edge, derived from long-wavelength X-ray diffraction data. We elucidate the role of potassium ions in protein synthesis at the three-dimensional level, most notably, in the environment of the ribosome functional decoding and peptidyl transferase centers. Our data expand the fundamental knowledge of the mechanism of ribosome function and structural integrity.
Subject terms: Ribosome, X-ray crystallography, Potassium
Metal ions play essential roles in myriads of biological processes, from catalytic co-factors to supporting protein and nucleic acid structures. Here the authors use long-wavelength X-ray diffraction to locate hundreds of potassium ions taking part in the formation of rRNA tertiary structure, mediating rRNA–protein interactions and supporting ribosomal protein structures and function.
Introduction
Metal ions play key roles in a broad range of cellular processes1–3. Typically, alkali and alkaline earth metals, such as Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ are critical for the stability, proper folding and functioning of RNA and proteins4–7, whereas transition metals are also involved in catalysis of redox reactions (Fe2+ or Cu2+)8,9 or act as Lewis acids in enzyme active sites (Zn2+)10,11. In the specific case of RNA, cations facilitate the dense folding arrangements of the negatively charged phosphate backbone of RNA molecules while enabling various cellular functions: gene expression (messenger (m-) RNAs and transfer (t-) RNAs), gene regulation (small nuclear, micro and small interfering RNAs), enzymatic activity (e.g., ribozymes), or resistance to pathogenic and parasitic invaders, observed in Eukarya12,13.
Functions and structures of biomolecules evolved in intracellular environments with K+ and Mg2+ among the predominant cations. Unsurprisingly, while both of these ions contribute to the stability of various RNA structures14–18, together they demonstrate a more pronounced synergistic effect19. These two ions demonstrate significant differences in properties: Mg2+ is a small ion (ionic radius 0.72 Å)20 with high charge density and strong preference of octahedral coordination (coordination number 6), while K+ is larger (ionic radius 1.51 Å)20, less charged, leaning towards higher coordination numbers (8–12). This precludes their competition and expands the variety of environments and modes of possible interactions of these cations, which is particularly crucial for macromolecular machines.
One such machine is the ribosome, the largest and the most abundant RNA-containing macromolecular complex in cells, ranging in size from 2.5 MDa in bacteria to 4 MDa in higher organisms. Ribosomes are conserved in all kingdoms of life: they are composed of rRNA and proteins unequally distributed among two asymmetric subunits (small and large subunits, 30S and 50S, respectively in bacteria)21. Ribosomes perform protein synthesis upon subunit association and interaction with mRNA and tRNA ligands; their structure and function strongly depend on the presence of divalent (mainly Mg2+, Zn2+) and monovalent (mainly K+, NH4+) cations22–25. Magnesium is the most characterized cation, its importance for ribosome activity was described by pioneers of ribosome research. Lack of Mg2+ in growth medium for E. coli induces ribosome degradation26. In vitro studies demonstrated that Mg2+ concentrations below 1 mM cause 70S ribosome subunit dissociation followed by unfolding27,28. However, magnesium is not the sole component responsible for proper ribosome activity. Early studies demonstrated that polyamines, particularly spermidine or spermine, can compensate for Mg2+ ions for optimum protein synthesis in in vitro translation systems29–35. The highest rate of protein synthesis in vitro, however, is achieved in the presence of Mg2+, polyamines and monovalent cations (K+/NH4+) together36–38. In addition, magnesium alone is insufficient to recover ribosome sedimentation profiles after treatment with high concentrations of EDTA due to the loss of other required ions39. Similarly, the complete substitution of Mg2+ by polyamines leads to inactivation and loss of integrity of ribosomal subunits in E. coli40,41. Polyamines are known to associate stably and abundantly with ribosomes42 but are very rarely detected in structural studies and even then ambiguously43, hence it was proposed that most of polyamine binding sites are differentially occupied in a stochastic manner44. The other key players of ribosome activity and stability are monovalent ions. In the absence of K+ ions for example, mammalian ribosomes irreversibly lose their poly-Phe polymerizing activity45, while E. coli ribosomes dissociate into subunits upon exposure to very high K+ concentrations46 or moderate Na+ concentrations47. Thus, none of the individual components, cations or polyamines, can entirely substitute for each other, and efficient translation by the ribosome can only be achieved by correct concentrations and balance between them.
Despite the vast biochemical data regarding the importance of metal ions for effective ribosome performance25 and the increasing number of ribosome structures solved by X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy, the identification of metal ions within the ribosome remains elusive due to methodological limitations. Therefore, in the majority of ribosome models derived from conventional data collection used for X-ray structures, metal ions are usually assigned as magnesium—the best-known RNA-stabilizing atom. Consequently, the local chemical environment of the metal ions was interpreted from the point of view of octahedral coordination.
Anomalous X-ray diffraction is a very well established tool to determine and localize ions in three-dimensional structures48,49. Every chemical element displays a characteristic set of absorption edges in the X-ray range, corresponding to the binding energies of electrons (K, L, M electron shells corresponding to K-, L-, M-edges). The anomalous signal from atoms of the element under investigation changes drastically across its absorption edge. Hence, peaks in the anomalous difference Fourier map from measurements on the high-energy side, which are not present in data on the low-energy side, reveal the atomic positions of the anomalous scatterers. The majority of synchrotron beamlines for macromolecular crystallography are optimized for the 6–17.5 keV X-ray range50. However, to detect and measure the anomalous signal from potassium around its K-edge (E = 3.608 keV) access to lower energies is necessary. The long-wavelength beamline I23 at Diamond Light Source is currently the only synchrotron beamline for macromolecular crystallography covering the energy range around the potassium K-edge. Experiments at long wavelengths have a number of obstacles to overcome: mainly large diffraction angles and absorption from air in the beam path, the sample mount, solvent around the crystal and the crystal itself. Beamline I23 has been designed to address these challenges by operating in a vacuum environment with a multi-axis goniometer and a large semi-cylindrical area detector51.
Here we demonstrate experimental identification and localization of potassium ions within the full 70S ribosome structure using diffraction data collected at long wavelengths, below (λ = 3.542 Å, E = 3.5 keV) and above (λ = 3.351 Å, E = 3.7 keV) the potassium K absorption edge. We present crystal structures of two 70S ribosomal functional complexes with mRNA and tRNAs, representing two distinct stages of translation: initiation and elongation. The 70S ribosome complex in the initiation state contains initiation tRNAfMet paired with the AUG codon in the peptidyl-site (P-site) with the aminoacyl-site (A-site) vacant. In the complex modeling the elongation state, three tRNAPhe are paired with UUU codons in the A-, P- and exit (E-) sites. Our findings provide insights into the role of metal ions in two ribosome active sites, the decoding and peptidyl transferase centers. We demonstrate how K+ (but not Mg2+) coordinates mRNA within the decoding center in order to maintain the correct frame position during the elongation state. We also localize potassium ions that are required for subunits association and stabilization of tRNAs, rRNAs, and r-proteins. These results shed light on the role of metal ions for the ribosome architecture and function, thereby expanding our view on fundamental aspects of protein synthesis.
Results
Metal ions assignment
We reinvestigated the structure of the Thermus thermophilus 70S ribosome in two different functional states, modeling the initiation stage (further referred to as initiation complex or IC) and elongation stage (further referred to as elongation complex or EC) of translation (Fig. 1a)52,53. The initiation complex was reconstituted from empty 70S ribosomes, a 27-nucleotide-long mRNA comprising the Shine-Dalgarno sequence with an AUG codon and a poly(A) extension and tRNAfMet (Supplementary Fig. 1a). In this complex, we found tRNA in the P and E sites; the presence of tRNA in the E site can be explained by the high excess of tRNA used in crystallization. The elongation complex was reconstituted from empty 70S ribosomes, a 60-nucleotide-long mRNA containing the Shine-Dalgarno sequence followed by a poly(U) tail and tRNAPheGAA (Supplementary Fig. 1b). tRNAPheGAA was found in the three sites binding tRNA: the A, P and E sites.
The diffraction data were collected above and below the potassium K-edge, at 3.7 keV (λ = 3.351 Å) and 3.5 keV (λ = 3.542 Å), respectively. K+ ions were assigned in positions showing peaks in the anomalous difference Fourier map above the absorption edge, but not in the corresponding map below the edge, and overlapping with positive peaks in the omit Fo−Fc map, generated from deposited diffraction data (λ = 1 Å) for the published structures53. The 70S model of the EC (PDB ID 4V6F) contained 3255 Mg2+ (including the instances of Mg(H2O)62+ modeled as Mg7). We have instead identified, 211 K+, based on anomalous data, 334 Mg2+ ions and 251 Mg(H2O)62+ (Fig. 1b–d). In the 70S model of the IC (PDB ID 4V6G) 1439 Mg2+ ions were modeled, which this study re-assigned as 127 K+, 189 Mg2+, and 237 Mg(H2O)62+ ions. Of course, the ions modeled as Mg2+ also should be fully or partially hydrated but relatively high displacement factors or relatively low occupancies prevent modeling of additional water molecules. Moreover, low site occupancy and high atomic displacement factors might have dampened the anomalous signal and prevented us from assigning more K+ ions in place of some of Mg2+/Mg(H2O)62+.
Our 70S structures contain 2 ribosomes per asymmetric unit and the exact number of assigned ions varies between the two ribosomes in the asymmetric unit. Below we use for reference one of the ribosomes from the elongation complex, where most of the K+ ions could be assigned (unless stated otherwise). The pairwise comparison of K+ composition in all four ribosomes is shown in Supplementary Table 1. Despite the strong implication of K+ ions in the 70S subunit dissociation, only two K+ ions were found to support intersubunit bridges, namely bridge B2a and bridge B2c, whereas the others were rather uniformly distributed all over the ribosome (Fig. 1c). The majority of K+ ions play a role in the stabilization of RNA through phosphate backbones or via coordination to exocyclic groups on stacked nucleotides. Among others, we have identified several K+ ions that form part of functional sites (the decoding and peptidyl transferase centers), stabilize tRNA ligands, or preserve rRNA–protein interactions. The interacting partners and putative coordination spheres of K+ ions discussed in the text and presented on the figures are summarized in Supplementary Data 1. The preferred coordination of K+ ions in the structures reported in this work were found to be predominantly square anti-prismatic or bi-capped square anti-prismatic (Supplementary Fig. 2) as opposed to octahedral for Mg2+ ions. Almost all of the identified K+ ions had been previously assigned as Mg2+ or Mg(H2O)62+ except 4 in EC and 28 in IC. In addition, our long-wavelength data allowed us to confirm the presence of a Fe4S4 cluster, which was first assigned by the group of T. Steitz54, bound to the Zn-finger of the ribosomal protein uS4.
Potassium ions in the 70S decoding center
We have closely analyzed the decoding center—the essential ribosomal functional site responsible for correct matching of mRNA codon and aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) anticodon during translation. Here, we reassigned two magnesium ions as potassium. One of which, present in both IC and EC (Fig. 2a), stabilizes the ribosomal elements of the decoding center, regardless of the presence of A-tRNA. This K+ ion is coordinated to the conserved nucleotides C518, G529 of the 16S rRNA (we use E. coli numbering of rRNA nucleotides throughout the manuscript as well as in the deposited PDB models) and amino acids Pro45, Asn46 of the universal ribosomal protein uS12 (Fig. 2a). The coordination has square antiprismatic geometry with coordination number 8 (Fig. 2b). The second K+ ion interacts with the mRNA in the A-site and helps orienting the third codon base for proper base pairing with anticodon residue 34 (consequently, it was identified only in the EC) (Fig. 2a). This ion is coordinated to the nucleotide (+6) of mRNA (third position of the A-codon, see Supplementary Fig. 1), C518 and G530 in anti conformation. The coordination has bi-capped square antiprismatic geometry with coordination number 10 (Fig. 3b). In the absence of A-tRNA, as seen in the IC, the mRNA is displaced farther from helix 18 and nucleotide G530 adopts a syn conformation as was shown for other A-tRNA-free ribosomal complexes53,55 and, thus, no K+ ion is bound in this region (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Movie 1). Additionally, distance/geometry-based analysis confirms the inability of Mg2+ or Mg(H2O)62+ to bind within these two pockets (Fig. 2b, c).
Potassium ions along the messenger RNA path
As was shown by the previous studies53,56,57, the mRNA path on the ribosome takes two bends, leading to the formation of a sharp kink between A- and P-codons (A/P kink) and a kink between P- and E-codons (P/E kink) in the mRNA chain (Fig. 3a–c). These kinks of the mRNA together with neighboring 16S rRNA nucleotides form negatively charged pockets that are highly favorable for binding either metal cations or water molecules. In our structure of the EC, we have localized a K+ ion in the P/E kink, which appears to be coordinated through its solvent shell according to the distances in the pocket (Fig. 3b). Previously, this ion, which participates in the network of contacts formed between the ms2i6A37 modification in the P site tRNAPhe and ribosomal elements surrounding the mRNA P/E kink, resulting in the anchoring of P-site tRNA, was assigned as magnesium53. In the A/P kink pocket we did not detect any anomalous signal and the size of the pocket is not favorable for coordination of K+, suggesting that the site is occupied by another ion/molecule interacting only with anionic phosphate oxygens (likely to be NH4+) (Fig. 3c). We observed electron density in this pocket only in the elongation complex. In fact, summarizing our previous studies53,58–62, we can point out the inconsistent appearance of the ligand-related density peaks in mRNA kinks. Therefore, we suggest that cations or solvent molecules play a secondary role in the formation of kinks, while the primary is performed by the structure of 16S rRNA and ribosomal proteins53.
Metal ions that stabilize other elements of the ribosome
The step-by-step advance of the ribosome along mRNA, accommodation and release of tRNA during translation require multiple rearrangements of ribosomal subunits relative to each other. A number of regions on the interface of ribosomal subunits, called intersubunit bridges, help to keep the ribosome intact and at the same time ensure its dynamics. Intersubunit bridges were first visualized as immediate contacts in low-resolution cryo-EM studies63,64. Then, at least 12 individual intersubunit bridges were identified in the first crystallographic study of functional 70S ribosome complexes65. Some of these bridges were suggested to be supported by metal ions. In our structures, we have identified one K+ ion coordinating to elements of the bridge B2a (h24-h45-H69), whereas one K+ and one Mg2+/Mg(H2O)62+ ion are coordinated to the constituent elements of the bridge B2c (h24-h27-H67) (Fig. 1c, d, Supplementary Data 1).
K+ ions are also found to stabilize the structure of tRNAs bound to the ribosome (Supplementary Fig. 3a). The A-site tRNA, for instance, contains a K+ ion in the anticodon stem loop (ASL), which presumably supports its accommodated state in the decoding center. The P-tRNA, aside from fixation by ribosomal components, is additionally stabilized by K+ and Mg2+ ions. One K+ is coordinating the interaction between its D-stem and H69 of the 23S rRNA (Supplementary Fig. 3A, circle b), while two other maintain the internal structure of P-tRNA in the T-loop and D-stem. As expected, the E-site tRNA is the least stabilized and no ions were found in this region.
Metal ions in ribosomal proteins and rRNA
The convoluted three-dimensional folding of the ribosomal RNA implies juxtaposition of nucleotides that are located far apart in the primary structure. Therefore, many metal ions, including potassium, localize in such regions to neutralize charge density and stabilize these nucleotides. The most representative example of such convolution is PTC, where peptide bond formation occurs. We assigned 30 K+ ions around and inside the PTC (Fig. 4a–c). Seven ions are located next to the inner shell of the PTC, and the others coordinate remote A and P loops responsible for orienting the -CCA ends of tRNA substrates. Another composite domain of the large subunit is the central protuberance—it comprises 5S rRNA wrapped by distant 23S rRNA helices and r-proteins. This region is supported by 12 K+ ions, three of which stabilize the 5S rRNA (Supplementary Fig. 3b) and the others coordinate H38, H83, H84 of 23S rRNA with proteins uL5 and uL16. On the small subunit, we found K+ ions in the 16S rRNA helix h18 that forms a part of the decoding center (Fig. 5a–c). One of the few and probably the main site, that maintains position of the head on the body of the 30S subunit, helix h28, is strengthened by a K+ ion (Fig. 5d). Helix h44, one of the principal helices of 16S rRNA and a part of the decoding center also contains coordinated K+ ions (Fig. 5e–f).
A number of distant nucleotides that are stabilized by potassium ions are found to be in stacking interaction with G–G as the preferred pattern. Some of those contacts are reminiscent of the interactions between potassium ions and O6 of guanines observed in G-quadruplexes66,67. Notably, in the 70S ribosome, we observed 51 K+ ions coordinating G–G stacking through phosphate oxygen backbone atoms (Supplementary Fig. 4a), nucleotide exocyclic groups, like O6 of G (Supplementary Fig. 4b, c) or ribose hydroxyl group and base atom (Supplementary Fig. 4d). We have divided these K+ ions into two types: Type I stabilize two consequent G stacking (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b), Type II are responsible for stabilization of stacking of distant G nucleotides (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). An extended list of K+ ions that stabilize distant rRNA nucleotides and G-stacking in both subunits can be found in Supplementary Data 1.
Metal ions like Mg2+ and K+ are mostly known to interact with RNA components of the ribosome. However, we identified several K+ ions associated with the following ribosomal proteins: bS6, bS20, uL2, uL3, uL4, uL5 and uL16 (Fig. 6). Most of these ions were found in local turning loops where the carbonyl oxygen atoms of the polypeptide backbone form a negatively charged pocket favorable for K+ ions. Potassium ions that interact with proteins bS20 and uL2 are newly identified ions, and are not replacing previously assigned magnesium.
Additionally, we have localized 12 K+ ions that stabilize the binding of proteins to rRNAs. Of those, 5 K+ atoms coordinate to the 16S rRNA and proteins uS11, uS13, uS14, bS20, and 7 K+ atoms coordinate to the 23S rRNA and proteins uL2, uL4, uL15, bL28 (Supplementary Fig. 5).
Discussion
The folding of RNA structures requires the presence of counter ions. Large macromolecular complexes which contain nucleic acids necessitate correspondingly large numbers of various metal ions. Improvement of data collection in X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM over the last decades68,69 has led to more detailed maps of 70S ribosomes, revealing density peaks tentatively attributed to metal ions. A multitude of technical limitations has prevented empirical identification of the nature of these ions and they were generally assigned as magnesium. Magnesium was chosen since it is the best-known RNA-stabilizing counter ion, and ribosomes tolerate only a very narrow concentration range during purification and in vitro experiments. At the same time, the presence of potassium has also been shown to be essential for these experiments, however, its role might have been understated due to a wider range of concentration tolerance25.
The universal method of localization of metal ions in macromolecular structures is the analysis of ion coordination and solvent environment; albeit, this method is subject to severe limitations and does not provide unambiguous assignment even in case of atomic resolution structures43. The structures of large macromolecular dynamic complexes generally have poor resolution statistics; the issue is compounded by the simultaneous presence of various ions that can be either co-purified or introduced from the solvent. Taking into account the corresponding values of coordinate errors and atomic displacement parameters, except at very high resolution, it appears almost impossible to distinguish between e.g., Mg2+, Na+ or K+ based only on average M…..O coordination distances (2.1, 2.4, and 2.8 Å, respectively) both by means of manual inspection or automated modelling software protocols. In addition, even at high resolution, the experimentally deduced electron densities are time-averages and, thus, it is not straightforward to assess the simultaneous presence of ions when in proximity (this can be sometimes solved by consideration of dynamics and partial occupancies, see e.g., ref. 70). Very few experimental approaches allow tackling such problems. X-ray spectroscopy can provide the oxidation state and coordination of individual atoms at very high resolution71. However, deconvoluting the signal from several atoms in different environments is difficult and it is unable to locate the atoms within large macromolecules. Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance and scanning transmission electron microscopy showed the potential in metal ions identification, but possess various limitations72,73. Thus, nowadays anomalous X-ray diffraction provides the only method to unambiguously assign the nature of metal ions in macromolecular structures, especially in cases with multiple different ions (reviewed in ref. 48). However, for light ions like Mg2+, Na+ or K+ the values for the anomalous contribution to the scattering f′′ are only small within the wavelength range available at typical synchrotron beamlines for macromolecular crystallography. At a wavelength of λ = 2 Å, f′′ for Mg2+ is 0.29 e– and 1.68 e− for K+, which means a partially occupied K+ could be mistaken for a Mg2+ atom. Here, we avoid this ambiguity by measuring datasets at two wavelengths, above and below the potassium K-absorption edge. The anomalous scattering factor f′′ for K varies significantly between the two wavelengths (f′′3.5 keV = 0.44 e− vs. f′′3.7 keV = 3.90 e−), while the one for Mg is almost constant (f′′3.5 keV = 0.85 e− vs. f′′3.7 keV = 0.77 e−). Hence, K+ cation positions can be unambiguously determined by peaks in the anomalous difference map calculated from data above the absorption edge, which are not present in the data below.
In the current paper, we present the direct experimental assignment of K+ ions in the full 70S ribosome structure by long-wavelength X-ray crystallography. Registering long-wavelength diffraction from ribosome crystals became possible thanks to the novel long-wavelength MX beamline at Diamond Light Source51. The resolution of the datasets at such long wavelengths is limited by the strong absorption of X-rays from the crystals, the surrounding mother liquor, and sample mounts. Nevertheless, our data allowed us to unambiguously assign about 30% of the metal sites as K+ and assign new ions (K+) in regions that were attributed to protein component.
In this work, we elucidate the role of K+ in protein synthesis at the three-dimensional level. The distribution of K+ ions over the whole mass of the ribosome indicates that this ion is as important as Mg2+. We show that potassium ions are involved in the stabilization of main functional ligands such as messenger RNA and transfer RNAs, as well as ribosomal RNAs and ribosomal proteins, via the interaction with nitrogen and oxygen atoms of side chain residues, nucleotide bases, polypeptide or sugar-phosphate backbones. These observations suggest more global and general functions of K+ ions in ribosomal organization rather than its role as a stabilizer of particular regions of the ribosome or particular type of interactions. The environment of some of the identified K+ ions suggested a hydrated state (Figures 3a, b), however, we cannot reliably model water molecules at 3.0–3.5 Å resolution.
Our data demonstrate that K+ ions preserve ribosome integrity and the architecture of the essential functional regions. One of such regions is the decoding center, responsible for the accommodation of correct aminoacyl-tRNA (A-tRNA) in the A-site of the ribosome. Previous studies on isolated 30S subunit model identified significant structural rearrangements happening upon binding of the tRNA to the A-site (termed ‘domain closure’)74. Later, our studies of the functional complexes of the full 70S ribosome53,58–62,75, showed that upon binding of aa-tRNA to the decoding center, the 70S ribosome undergoes only small conformational changes to proceed from the initiation to the elongation state. This movement, named ‘shoulder locking’53, displaces the 30S shoulder domain approximately 2–3 Å towards the neck, while the other parts of the 30S subunit remain immobile. It leads to a contraction of the downstream mRNA tunnel and, as a result, a network of non-specific interactions between the 16S rRNA and mRNA nucleotides forms53, allowing tighter binding of mRNA. Our current study illustrates that two potassium ions serve as coordinators of these conformational rearrangements in the decoding center upon binding of A-tRNA.
Notably, both these ions were previously assigned as magnesium53,55,56,58. The ion at the third position of codon–anticodon interaction was initially observed in the structure of the 30 S subunit co-crystallized with truncated mimics of mRNA and tRNAs; it was suggested to coordinate to 2′ OH of nucleotide (+6) of mRNA with the O2 of C518 (16S rRNA) and the main-chain carbonyl of Pro45 (protein uS12)55. Later, coordination of this ion (still assigned as Mg2+) was re-evaluated using the crystal structure of the 70S containing long mRNA and full-length tRNA58. Based on careful analysis of the environment around the third mRNA-tRNA base pair in the A-site, the identity of these atoms was recently called into question76,77. The stabilization role of hydrogen bonding between 2′ OH of mRNA nucleotide at the third position with O6 of G530 of the 16S rRNA55 remains disputable, since the distance between these two atoms varies in different crystal structures, regardless of the presence of cognate or near-cognate base pair.
The P-site tRNA has also differences in ion composition in our two complexes. In the EC, two Mg2+ and three K+ ions stabilize the P-tRNA (Supplementary Fig. 3a), while three Mg2+ ions are found in the IC. Interestingly, in IC, two Mg2+ stabilize the ASL of P-tRNA, and one Mg2+ ion is coordinated to its CCA-end. In the EC, ions are mostly localized in the body of the P-tRNA. These differences, however, might be related to the nature of tRNA.
Not much is known so far about the role of ions in the mRNA path (namely the P/E and A/P kinks). In our EC structure, extra electron density was observed in both kinks. As we mentioned above, the presence of electron density in these pockets is not uniform, and the absence of metals in IC might be caused by incorrect pockets formation primarily due to the different conformation of mRNA. The binding of non-cognate E-tRNA (same tRNAfMet as in the P-site) in the IC is unspecific and thus may not be driving the proper formation of the P/E kink pocket. Conversely, in the EC, the poly-U mRNA forms base-pairing interactions with the cognate tRNAPhe in all three binding sites (including the E-site78) and therefore has a more controlled conformation. Additionally, the metal ion in the P/E kink appears to be coordinated to the 2-methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenosine modified nucleotide 37 in tRNAPhe (see Fig. 3b). The presence of the modification on nucleotide 37 of the tRNA is suggested to stabilize the first codon–anticodon base pair by stacking interactions53 and to hinder possible translational frame-shifting79–81. The potassium ion coordination in the P/E-kink region might be a part of this mechanism. Regarding the A/P kink region, we have observed additional electron density in the EC only, where mRNA is locked in its position upon the binding of A-tRNA. The absence of an “A-tRNA-lock” could be one of the reasons for the absence of the same density in the A/P kink of IC. Meantime, analysis of previous crystal structures of various functional 70S ribosomes in complex with A-/P/-E-tRNAs (with 2 ribosomes per ASU), solved by our group, showed that the density in the A/P kink region was not always present. In 33 structures we observed (and modeled as Mg2+) difference map peaks in the A/P kink region in 35 ribosomes out of 6653,58–62. The four phosphate groups (16S rRNA 1401 and 1402; mRNA +4 and +5) are placed in close to planar arrangement, resulting in 3.1–3.9 Å M….O distances. The refined positions of modeled “Mg2+” ions are spread, however, in a sphere of ~1 Å diameter. The bond distances are clearly too long for inner-sphere Mg2+ or K+ ion binding, and the absence of observed anomalous signal in this pocket in the current study suggests that the probability of the ligand being a K+ ion is very low (Fig. 3c).
To date, the only study attempting experimentally to identify and distinguish monovalent and divalent ions in the ribosome structure was done using the large ribosomal subunit of archaea Haloarcula marismortui82. In that work 50S subunits were crystallized and treated in the presence of K+, NH4+, Cd2+ and excess of Na+, then were soaked in excess of Rb+ ions. By comparing the data from native crystals with anomalous diffraction of Rb+ treated crystals authors identified and localized 82 Na+ and 2 K+; also, based on electron density features and geometry considerations, 166 Mg2+, and 5 Cd2+ ions were assigned. The two K+ ions assigned in that work agree with the assignment in our structure: one K+ is in the PTC (coordinating to G2061, G2447, C2501, and U2503) and the other one in H11 of the 23S rRNA (coordinating to C192, U193, A202).
Notwithstanding, K+ ions can be found in many ribosome structure models deposited by different research groups. We have analyzed and aligned all K+-containing models of the ribosomes and subunits available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). They included 67 structures of H. marismortui 50 S subunit, 2 structures of Deinococcus radiodurans 50S subunit, 6 structures of E. coli 70S ribosome, 32 structures of T. thermophilus 70S ribosome and 35 structures of T. thermophilus 30S subunit. Among them, PDB ID 2UUB83 has maximum agreement of K+ ions with our structures (5 out of 35). Despite the presence of K+ ions in many deposited models of the ribosome, only a few papers describe how metal ions were assigned. Overall the assignment was tentative, either relying on agreement between peak selection in the Fo−Fc maps and expected geometric parameters for ligand binding82,84 or retaining the bias from structures with the highest resolution, used as initial reference during model building and refinement85–87. Notably, these high-resolution structures88, that were used as templates for metal assignments in many T. thermophilus 30S subunit structures, contain 62 and 73 K+ ions per structure, however the article lacks any information about metal ions assignment as well as experimental evidence.
As was shown for Na+ in the structure of 50S ribosomal subunit of a halophilic archaea H. marismortui, monovalent ions have some preferential binding regions, such as RNA major grooves or stacking G–G pairs82. In our structures of 70S ribosomes of thermophilic bacterium T. thermophilus we observe similar tendencies for K+ ions. It would be interesting to see how the Mg2+/K+ ratio and these metal ions distribution along the ribosome correlates with environmental niches of different Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and whether such correlation can be extrapolated into functional activity. On one hand, it was shown that the cellular concentrations of K+ in non-stressed Gram-positive bacteria are usually much higher than their Gram-negative counterparts (for review see ref. 89). On the other hand, protein synthesis is one of the most ancient and conserved processes in all living cells and such a difference can be related only to osmotic homeostasis rather than enzymatic processes. Additionally, a plethora of biochemical studies demonstrated the requirement of both ions for proper ribosome performance in different organisms (rev. in ref. 25). Thus, it is plausible that the number of ions and their ratio in the ribosome will be comparable in all bacterial species. In this case, predominance of G–G coordination in T. thermophilus simply coincides with the abundance of G/C content in its ribosome. In conclusion, metal ions, especially alkali metal ions (i.e., Na+ and especially K+ as main internal cellular ions90) are ubiquitous components of biological systems that provide functionality for essential macromolecules, thus playing a more important role than simple ionic buffering agents or mediators of solute exchange. Moreover, K+ is an important element in the structural organization of biological macromolecules. However, it is not trivial to identify K+ ions in structures using conventional structure determination techniques, and it is particularly complicated for large complexes. Here, we presented the direct experimental assignment of K+ ions in the structure of 70S ribosome, utilizing long-wavelength X-ray diffraction available at the unique in vacuum beamline I23, at Diamond Light Source (UK). Two functional complexes, representing two different functional states of the ribosome, demonstrated the role of K+ in stabilization of ligands on the translation machinery.
Our work adds deeper insights into the mechanism of protein synthesis and open another dimension in understanding of ribosome organization. We show that some regions (e.g., the decoding center) require very precise localization, coordination and nature of metal ions. In turn, dynamical regions, such as the intersubunit bridge B2c or the A/P-kink, tolerate different ions depending on the state of the ribosome and metal-binding pocket conformation. Our observations display contrasting behaviors for the interactions of potassium and magnesium ions with ribosomal complexes. While magnesium ions tend to bind in pockets around anionic phosphate oxygen atoms with tight geometrical constraints43, potassium ions interact with backbone carbonyl groups in protein bending folds and hydroxyl group of riboses or carbonyl groups on bases77, especially guanine nucleotides, with a variable number of ligands and larger distance variations.
Methods
70S ribosome purification and crystallization
70 S ribosomes were purified from Thermus thermophilus cells, as described previously53,91. Uncharged native individual tRNAPhe and tRNAfMet from E. coli were purchased from Chemical Block (Russia). All mRNAs were purchased from Thermo Scientific (USA) and deprotected following the supplier procedure. The exact sequences were as follows: mRNA(IC) = GGCAAGGAGGUAAAAAUGA9; mRNA(EC) = U27GGCAAGGAGGU22. The ribosomal complexes were formed in 10 mM Tris-acetate pH 7.0, 10 mM NH4Cl, 50 mM KCl, 9 mM Mg(CH3COO)2, at 37 °C for 20 min. For all complexes, the 70S ribosomes (3 μM) were incubated with fivefold stoichiometric excess of mRNA and three to fivefold excess of tRNA53.
Crystals were grown at 24 °C via vapor diffusion in sitting-drop plates (CrysChem, Hampton Research). The ribosomal complex (2 μL) containing 2.8 mM Deoxy Big Chaps (CalBioChem) was mixed with the equal volume of the crystallization solution composed of 3.7–4.1% (w/v) PEG 20,000, 3.7–4.1% (w/v) PEG550mme, 100 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.0, 100 mM KSCN. The crystals grew for 2–3 weeks and were then dehydrated by exchanging the reservoir for 60% (v/v) 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. Prior to plunge freezing in liquid nitrogen, crystals were cryo-protected by the addition of 30% (v/v) 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol and 14 mM Mg(CH3COO)2. In order to reduce the solvent content and the absorbance of the loop, we cryo-cooled crystals in elliptical loops either made of polyimide (LitholoopsTM, Molecular Dimensions Ltd, Newmarket, UK), or laser-cut (Scitech Precision Ltd, Oxfordshire, UK) from black Kapton® B (DuPont, USA). The crystals were further transferred into the vacuum vessel using an adapted cryo-transfer system (Leica VCT100).
Data collection, model building, and structure analysis
The data were collected at Diamond Light Source I23 beamline51, equipped with a Pilatus 12M (Dectris AG, Switzerland) detector, at two different wavelengths, 3.351 and 3.542 Å, using inverse beam method with 20° wedges. Data were processed using XDS92 and half-datasets were merged using XSCALE (Supplementary Tables 2, 3). The data were collected from several crystals, however, non-isomorphism forbade using multi-crystal averaging to improve the signal and the datasets were treated separately. The structures were solved by molecular replacement using the deposited models (PDB ID 4V6G and 4V6F) with removed metal ions. From the deposited data, omit maps were generated in Phenix93 using models with removed metal ions. The anomalous maps from long-wavelength data were generated using ANODE94. The positions of anomalous peaks higher than 4.0σ as output by ANODE from datasets both above and below potassium K-edge were inspected in COOT95 and compared with difference peaks in native omit maps. Potassium ions were modeled in the positions, where positive omit difference density peaks (> 3.5σ) overlapped with the anomalous difference peaks above the edge but not the anomalous difference peaks below the edge. Remaining positive difference omit peaks were modeled as Mg(H2O)62+/Mg2+ ions. The models were then refined in Phenix against deposited diffraction data (Supplementary Table 4). We have applied a conservative cutoff of 4.0σ to anomalous map peaks to avoid false positives. The majority of peaks between 3.5 and 4.0σ corresponded to phosphorus and sulfur atoms and some may correspond to less-defined potassium sites.
The interactions of assigned K+ ions with ribosome components were visualized in UCSF Chimera96 using “Find Clashes/Contacts” function which identifies interatomic contacts based on van der Waals (VDW) radii of interacting atoms with overlap allowance of −0.5 Å. The overlap between two atoms was defined as the sum of their VDW radii minus the distance between them and minus an allowance for potentially hydrogen-bonded pairs:
Default VDW values were assigned in Chimera based on the atom type. For K+ ions with default coordination number (6), the radius was assigned as 1.38 Å based on the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 82nd edition20. In the absence of explicit hydrogens for C, N, O, and S the software uses default VDW radii based on the ProtOr set97. For P, in the context of molecules (as opposed to singleton ions), atom radii 1.871 Å derived from the Amber parm99 parameters98 [RVDW = (R*)/(21/6)] was used by Chimera. These selection criteria, though, do not take into account possible outer-sphere coordination, nor identify complete inner-sphere coordination due to absence of solvent molecules from the model.
The potassium ions and their environments discussed in the manuscript are summarized in Supplementary Data 1.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff at Diamond Light Source for their support. We are grateful to the anonymous referees for their helpful and constructive comments. E.W. would like to thank P. Auffinger (ARN, IBMC, CNRS) for numerous discussions on ion binding to RNA. This work was supported by the French National Research Agency grants ANR-15-CE11-0021-01 (to G.Y. and E.W.), ANR-16-CE11-0007-01 (M.Y.), “La Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale” DBF20160635745, France (to G.Y.) and the Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University (to I.K. and M.Y). This study was also supported by the grant ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT, a French State fund managed by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the frame program Investissements d’Avenir ANR-10-IDEX-0002–02.
Author contributions
A.R., G.Y. and A.W. conceived the project; A.R. and I.K. performed data collection and analysis with assistance from K.E.O., R.D., V.M. and A.W.; A.R. and I.K. wrote the manuscript in consultation with E.W., M.Y. and A.W. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All datasets and refined models are deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 6QNQ (IC) and 6QNR (EC).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Journal Peer Review Information: Nature Communications thanks Alexander Serganov and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Alexey Rozov, Iskander Khusainov.
Contributor Information
Alexey Rozov, Email: ar@ribostruct.com.
Armin Wagner, Email: armin.wagner@diamond.ac.uk.
Gulnara Yusupova, Email: gula@igbmc.fr.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-10409-4.
References
- 1.Holm RH, Kennepohl P, Solomon EI. Structural and functional aspects of metal sites in biology. Chem. Rev. 1996;96:2239–2314. doi: 10.1021/cr9500390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rotzschke O, Lau JM, Hofstatter M, Falk K, Strominger JL. A pH-sensitive histidine residue as control element for ligand release from HLA-DR molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:16946–16950. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212643999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sigel, A., Sigel, H. & Sigel, R. K. Structural and catalytic roles of metal ions in RNA. Met. Ions Life Sci. 9, vii–ix (2011). [PubMed]
- 4.Celander DW, Cech TR. Visualizing the higher order folding of a catalytic RNA molecule. Science. 1991;251:401–407. doi: 10.1126/science.1989074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pyle AM. Metal ions in the structure and function of RNA. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2002;7:679–690. doi: 10.1007/s00775-002-0387-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zot HG, Potter JD. A structural role for the Ca2+ -Mg2 + sites on troponin C in the regulation of muscle contraction. Preparation and properties of troponin C depleted myofibrils. J. Biol. Chem. 1982;257:7678–7683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Serra MJ, et al. Effects of magnesium ions on the stabilization of RNA oligomers of defined structures. RNA. 2002;8:307–323. doi: 10.1017/S1355838202024226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.MacPherson IS, Murphy ME. Type-2 copper-containing enzymes. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2007;64:2887–2899. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7310-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Solomon EI, et al. Copper active sites in biology. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:3659–3853. doi: 10.1021/cr400327t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McCall KA, Huang C, Fierke CA. Function and mechanism of zinc metalloenzymes. J. Nutr. 2000;130:1437S–1446S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.5.1437S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pace NJ, Weerapana E. Zinc-binding cysteines: diverse functions and structural motifs. Biomolecules. 2014;4:419–434. doi: 10.3390/biom4020419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aravin AA, Hannon GJ, Brennecke J. The Piwi-piRNA pathway provides an adaptive defense in the transposon arms race. Science. 2007;318:761–764. doi: 10.1126/science.1146484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rollins MF, Schuman JT, Paulus K, Bukhari HS, Wiedenheft B. Mechanism of foreign DNA recognition by a CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:2216–2222. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Misra VK, Draper DE. On the role of magnesium ions in RNA stability. Biopolymers. 1998;48:113–135. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1998)48:2<113::AID-BIP3>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Misra VK, Draper DE. The linkage between magnesium binding and RNA folding. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;317:507–521. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2002.5422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Conn GL, Gittis AG, Lattman EE, Misra VK, Draper DE. A compact RNA tertiary structure contains a buried backbone-K+ complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;318:963–973. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00147-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leipply D, Lambert D, Draper DE. Ion-RNA interactions thermodynamic analysis of the effects of mono- and divalent ions on RNA conformational equilibria. Methods Enzym. 2009;469:433–463. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)69021-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Auffinger P, D’Ascenzo L, Ennifar E. Sodium and potassium interactions with nucleic acids. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2016;16:167–201. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21756-7_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lambert D, Leipply D, Shiman R, Draper DE. The influence of monovalent cation size on the stability of RNA tertiary structures. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;390:791–804. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: A Ready-Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data. (CRC Press, 2001).
- 21.Melnikov S, et al. One core, two shells: bacterial and eukaryotic ribosomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012;19:560–567. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gordon J, Lipmann F. Role of divalent ions in poly U-directed phenylalanine polymerization. J. Mol. Biol. 1967;23:23–33. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(67)80064-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weiss RL, Kimes BW, Morris DR. Cations and ribosome structure. III. Effects on the 30S and 50S subunits of replacing bound Mg2+ Inorg. cations. Biochem. 1973;12:450–456. doi: 10.1021/bi00727a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stahli C, Noll H. Structural dynamics of bacterial ribosomes. VI. Denaturation of active ribosomes by Mg2+ dependent conformational transitions. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1977;153:159–168. doi: 10.1007/BF00264731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nierhaus KH. Mg2+ , K + , and the ribosome. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:3817–3819. doi: 10.1128/JB.02297-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McCarthy B. The effects of magnesium starvation on the ribosome content of Escherichia coli. Biochim. et. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Spec. Sect. Nucleic Acids Relat. Subj. 1962;55:880–889. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gesteland RF. Unfolding of Escherichia coli ribosomes by removal of magnesium. J. Mol. Biol. 1966;18:356–IN314. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(66)80253-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gavrilova L, Ivanov D, Spirin A. Studies on the structure of ribosomes: III. Stepwise unfolding of the 50 s particles without loss of ribosomal protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1966;16:473–IN428. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(66)80186-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hershko A, Amoz S, Mager J. Effect of polyamines and divalent metals on in vitro incorporation of amino acids into ribonucleoprotein particles. Biochem Biophys. Res Commun. 1961;5:46–51. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(61)90078-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martin RG, Ames BN. The effect of polyamines and of poly U size on phenylalanine incorporation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1962;48:2171–2178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.12.2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nathans D, Lipmann F. Amino acid transfer from aminoacyl-ribonucleic acids to protein on ribosomes of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1961;47:497–504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.47.4.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Takeda Y. Polyamines and protein synthesis. I. The effect of polyamines on cell free polyphenylalanine synthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Biochem. 1969;66:345–349. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a129152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Igarashi K, Hikami K, Sugawara K, Hirose S. Effect of polyamines on polypeptide synthesis in rat liver cell-free system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1973;299:325–330. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(73)90356-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Igarashi K, Sugawara K, Izumi I, Nagayama C, Hirose S. Effect of polyamines of polyphenylalanine synthesis by Escherichia coli and rat-liver ribosomes. Eur. J. Biochem. 1974;48:495–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03790.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Konecki D, Kramer G, Pinphanichakarn P, Hardesty B. Polyamines are necessary for maximum in vitro synthesis of globin peptides and play a role in chain initiation. Arch. Biochem Biophys. 1975;169:192–198. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(75)90332-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jelenc PC, Kurland CG. Nucleoside triphosphate regeneration decreases the frequency of translation errors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1979;76:3174–3178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rheinberger HJ, Nierhaus KH. The ribosomal E site at low Mg2 + : coordinate inactivation of ribosomal functions at Mg2 + concentrations below 10 mM and its prevention by polyamines. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1987;5:435–446. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1987.10506403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bartetzko A, Nierhaus KH. Mg2 + /NH4 + /polyamine system for polyuridine-dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis with near in vivo characteristics. Methods Enzym. 1988;164:650–658. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(88)64075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tal M. Metal ions and ribosomal conformation. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 1969;195:76–86. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(69)90604-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weiss RL, Morris DR. Cations and ribosome structure. I. Effects on the 30S subunit of substituting polyamines for magnesium ion. Biochemistry. 1973;12:435–441. doi: 10.1021/bi00727a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kimes BW, Morris DR. Cations and ribosome structure. II. Effects on the 50S subunit of substituting polyamines for magnesium ion. Biochemistry. 1973;12:442–449. doi: 10.1021/bi00727a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cohen SS, Lichtenstein J. Polyamines and ribosome structure. J. Biol. Chem. 1960;235:2112–2116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Leonarski F, D’Ascenzo L, Auffinger P. Mg2 + ions: do they bind to nucleobase nitrogens? Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:987–1004. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dever TE, Ivanov IP. Roles of polyamines in translation. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:18719–18729. doi: 10.1074/jbc.TM118.003338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Naslund PH, Hultin T. Effects of potassium deficiency on mammalian ribosomes. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 1970;204:237–247. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(70)90507-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zitomer RS, Flaks JG. Magnesium dependence and equilibrium of the Escherichia coli ribosomal subunit association. J. Mol. Biol. 1972;71:263–279. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90350-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Spirin AS, Sabo B, Kovalenko VA. Dependence of dissociation-association of uncharged ribosomes of Escherichia coli on the Mg2 + concentration, ionic strength, pH and temperature. FEBS Lett. 1971;15:197–200. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(71)80310-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Handing KB, et al. Characterizing metal-binding sites in proteins with X-ray crystallography. Nat. Protoc. 2018;13:1062–1090. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2018.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Volbeda, A. in Metalloproteins: Methods and Protocols (eds Juan C. Fontecilla-Camps & Yvain Nicolet) 189-206 (Humana Press, 2014).
- 50.Djinovic Carugo K, Helliwell JR, Stuhrmann H, Weiss MS. Softer and soft X-rays in macromolecular crystallography. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2005;12:410–419. doi: 10.1107/S0909049504025762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wagner A, Duman R, Henderson K, Mykhaylyk V. In-vacuum long-wavelength macromolecular crystallography. Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. D: Struct. Biol. 2016;72:430–439. doi: 10.1107/S2059798316001078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yusupova G, Jenner L, Rees B, Moras D, Yusupov M. Structural basis for messenger RNA movement on the ribosome. Nature. 2006;444:391–394. doi: 10.1038/nature05281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jenner LB, Demeshkina N, Yusupova G, Yusupov M. Structural aspects of messenger RNA reading frame maintenance by the ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17:555–560. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Polikanov YS, Steitz TA, Innis CA. A proton wire to couple aminoacyl-tRNA accommodation and peptide-bond formation on the ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014;21:787–793. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ogle JM, et al. Recognition of cognate transfer RNA by the 30S ribosomal subunit. Science. 2001;292:897–902. doi: 10.1126/science.1060612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Selmer M, et al. Structure of the 70S ribosome complexed with mRNA and tRNA. Science. 2006;313:1935–1942. doi: 10.1126/science.1131127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yusupova GZ, Yusupov MM, Cate JH, Noller HF. The path of messenger RNA through the ribosome. Cell. 2001;106:233–241. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00435-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Demeshkina N, Jenner L, Westhof E, Yusupov M, Yusupova G. A new understanding of the decoding principle on the ribosome. Nature. 2012;484:256–259. doi: 10.1038/nature10913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rozov A, Demeshkina N, Westhof E, Yusupov M, Yusupova G. Structural insights into the translational infidelity mechanism. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7251. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rozov A, Westhof E, Yusupov M, Yusupova G. The ribosome prohibits the G*U wobble geometry at the first position of the codon-anticodon helix. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6434–6441. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rozov A, et al. Novel base-pairing interactions at the tRNA wobble position crucial for accurate reading of the genetic code. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10457. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rozov Alexey, Wolff Philippe, Grosjean Henri, Yusupov Marat, Yusupova Gulnara, Westhof Eric. Tautomeric G•U pairs within the molecular ribosomal grip and fidelity of decoding in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;46(14):7425–7435. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Frank J, et al. A model of the translational apparatus based on a three-dimensional reconstruction of the Escherichia coli ribosome. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1995;73:757–765. doi: 10.1139/o95-084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gabashvili IS, et al. Solution structure of the E. coli 70S ribosome at 11.5 A resolution. Cell. 2000;100:537–549. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80690-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yusupov MM, et al. Crystal structure of the ribosome at 5.5 A resolution. Science. 2001;292:883–896. doi: 10.1126/science.1060089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kang C, Zhang X, Ratliff R, Moyzis R, Rich A. Crystal structure of four-stranded Oxytricha telomeric DNA. Nature. 1992;356:126–131. doi: 10.1038/356126a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Haider S, Parkinson GN, Neidle S. Crystal structure of the potassium form of an Oxytricha nova G-quadruplex. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;320:189–200. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00428-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yusupova G, Yusupov M. Ribosome biochemistry in crystal structure determination. RNA. 2015;21:771–773. doi: 10.1261/rna.050039.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Brown A, Shao S. Ribosomes and cryo-EM: a duet. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2018;52:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Auffinger P, Bielecki L, Westhof E. The Mg2 + binding sites of the 5S rRNA loop E motif as investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. Chem. Biol. 2003;10:551–561. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(03)00121-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ascone I, Strange R. Biological X-ray absorption spectroscopy and metalloproteomics. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2009;16:413–421. doi: 10.1107/S0909049509010425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wu G, Zhu J. NMR studies of alkali metal ions in organic and biological solids. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson Spectrosc. 2012;61:1–70. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Elad N, Bellapadrona G, Houben L, Sagi I, Elbaum M. Detection of isolated protein-bound metal ions by single-particle cryo-STEM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:11139–11144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708609114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ogle JM, Murphy FV, Tarry MJ, Ramakrishnan V. Selection of tRNA by the ribosome requires a transition from an open to a closed form. Cell. 2002;111:721–732. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01086-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jenner L, Demeshkina N, Yusupova G, Yusupov M. Structural rearrangements of the ribosome at the tRNA proofreading step. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17:1072–1078. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rozov A, Demeshkina N, Westhof E, Yusupov M, Yusupova G. New structural insights into translational miscoding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016;41:798–814. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Leonarski F, D’Ascenzo L, Auffinger P. Nucleobase carbonyl groups are poor Mg2+ inner-sphere binders but excellent monovalent ion binders-a critical PDB survey. RNA. 2019;25:173–192. doi: 10.1261/rna.068437.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jenner L, Rees B, Yusupov M, Yusupova G. Messenger RNA conformations in the ribosomal E site revealed by X-ray crystallography. EMBO Rep. 2007;8:846–850. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Urbonavicius J, Qian Q, Durand JM, Hagervall TG, Bjork GR. Improvement of reading frame maintenance is a common function for several tRNA modifications. EMBO J. 2001;20:4863–4873. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Urbonavicius J, et al. Transfer RNA modifications that alter +1 frameshifting in general fail to affect −1 frameshifting. RNA. 2003;9:760–768. doi: 10.1261/rna.5210803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wilson RK, Roe BA. Presence of the hypermodified nucleotide N6-(delta 2-isopentenyl)-2-methylthioadenosine prevents codon misreading by Escherichia coli phenylalanyl-transfer RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1989;86:409–413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Klein DJ, Moore PB, Steitz TA. The contribution of metal ions to the structural stability of the large ribosomal subunit. RNA. 2004;10:1366–1379. doi: 10.1261/rna.7390804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Weixlbaumer A, et al. Mechanism for expanding the decoding capacity of transfer RNAs by modification of uridines. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007;14:498–502. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Belousoff MJ, et al. Crystal structure of the synergistic antibiotic pair, lankamycin and lankacidin, in complex with the large ribosomal subunit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:2717–2722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019406108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Demirci H, et al. Modification of 16S ribosomal RNA by the KsgA methyltransferase restructures the 30S subunit to optimize ribosome function. RNA. 2010;16:2319–2324. doi: 10.1261/rna.2357210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Choi J, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine in mRNA disrupts tRNA selection and translation-elongation dynamics. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016;23:110–115. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Choi J, et al. 2’-O-methylation in mRNA disrupts tRNA decoding during translation elongation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018;25:208–216. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0030-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kurata S, et al. Modified uridines with C5-methylene substituents at the first position of the tRNA anticodon stabilize U.G wobble pairing during decoding. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:18801–18811. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800233200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Sleator RD, Hill C. Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002;26:49–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Epstein W. The roles and regulation of potassium in bacteria. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 2003;75:293–320. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6603(03)75008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Gogia ZV, Yusupov MM, Spirina TN. Structure of Thermus thermophilus ribosomes. 1. Method of isolation and purification of ribosomes. Mol. Biol. (Mosc.) 1986;20:519–526. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kabsch W. Xds. Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:125–132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Adams PD, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta. Crystallogr. D Biol .Crystallogr. 2010;66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Thorn A, Sheldrick GM. ANODE: anomalous and heavy-atom density calculation. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011;44:1285–1287. doi: 10.1107/S0021889811041768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Tsai J, Taylor R, Chothia C, Gerstein M. The packing density in proteins: standard radii and volumes. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;290:253–266. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Cheatham TE, 3rd, Cieplak P, Kollman PA. A modified version of the Cornell et al. force field with improved sugar pucker phases and helical repeat. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1999;16:845–862. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1999.10508297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All datasets and refined models are deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 6QNQ (IC) and 6QNR (EC).