Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2019 Apr 6;139:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.001

Table 8.

Multiple Regression Predicting Child Food Responsiveness

	Child Weight Status		Dietary Intake		Food Fussiness		Satiety Responsiveness
	Cox & Snell R²	B	Adjusted R²	Standardized β	Adjusted R²	Standardized β	Adjusted R²	Standardized β
Step 1	.151^**		.193^**		.065^*		.002
PC’s age		.303		.025		.001		.004
PC’s weight status		2.105
TC’s age		.020		−.122		−.084		−.029
TC’s sex		−.141		.028		.151		−.007
TC’s race/ethnicity
Black		−.614		−.339		.050		−.199
Hispanic		−.022		.124		.207		−.186
Hmong		.191		−.124		.071		.027
Native		−.482		−.080		.303		−.089
American
Somali		−.373		.192		.017		−.036
Step 2	.281^**		.170		.042		.021
Household composition
2 parents with other adults		1.650		−.012		.012		−.024
1 parent only		−1.069		−.053		.088		.259
1 parents with other adults		−.841		.031		.081		.026
Household income
Income 2		−1.146		−.125		−.012		.086
Income 3		−1.708		−.070		.033		.078
Income 4		−.680		−.069		−.053		.018
Income 5		.808		.053		.045		−.028
Income 6		2.517		−.027		−.139		.109
Step 3	.284		.172		.045		.033
Latent profile		−.365		.093		−.104		−.138

Note. PC = primary caregiver. TC = target child. Coefficients are from the last step of each analysis.

^*

p < .05,

^**

p < .01 for change in R².