Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0217314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217314

Influence of genetic factors on long-term treatment related neurocognitive complications, and on anxiety and depression in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: The Petale study

Kateryna Petrykey 1,2, Sarah Lippé 1,3, Philippe Robaey 1,4,5,6, Serge Sultan 1,3, Julie Laniel 1,3, Simon Drouin 1, Laurence Bertout 1, Patrick Beaulieu 1, Pascal St-Onge 1, Aubrée Boulet-Craig 1,3, Aziz Rezgui 1, Yutaka Yasui 7, Yadav Sapkota 7, Kevin R Krull 7, Melissa M Hudson 7,8, Caroline Laverdière 1,9, Daniel Sinnett 1,9, Maja Krajinovic 1,2,9,*
Editor: Cinzia Ciccacci10
PMCID: PMC6557490  PMID: 31181069

Abstract

Background

A substantial number of survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia suffer from treatment-related late adverse effects including neurocognitive impairment. While multiple studies have described neurocognitive outcomes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) survivors, relatively few have investigated their association with individual genetic constitution.

Methods

To further address this issue, genetic variants located in 99 genes relevant to the effects of anticancer drugs and in 360 genes implicated in nervous system function and predicted to affect protein function, were pooled from whole exome sequencing data of childhood ALL survivors (PETALE cohort) and analyzed for an association with neurocognitive complications, as well as with anxiety and depression. Variants that sustained correction for multiple testing were genotyped in entire cohort (n = 236) and analyzed with same outcomes.

Results

Common variants in MTR, PPARA, ABCC3, CALML5, CACNB2 and PCDHB10 genes were associated with deficits in neurocognitive tests performance, whereas a variant in SLCO1B1 and EPHA5 genes was associated with anxiety and depression. Majority of associations were modulated by intensity of treatment. Associated variants were further analyzed in an independent SJLIFE cohort of 545 ALL survivors. Two variants, rs1805087 in methionine synthase, MTR and rs58225473 in voltage-dependent calcium channel protein encoding gene, CACNB2 are of particular interest, since associations of borderline significance were found in replication cohort and remain significant in combined discovery and replication groups (OR = 1.5, 95% CI, 1–2.3; p = 0.04 and; OR = 3.7, 95% CI, 1.25–11; p = 0.01, respectively). Variant rs4149056 in SLCO1B1 gene also deserves further attention since previously shown to affect methotrexate clearance and short-term toxicity in ALL patients.

Conclusions

Current findings can help understanding of the influence of genetic component on long-term neurocognitive impairment. Further studies are needed to confirm whether identified variants may be useful in identifying survivors at increased risk of these complications.

Introduction

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most frequent childhood cancer [1] accounting for approximately 25% of all cases [2]. The five-year survival rate of childhood ALL is currently greater than 85% due to the optimization of multi-agent risk-adapted treatment strategies [2, 3]. However, the exposure to specific chemotherapeutic agents and/or cranial radiation therapy during a susceptible period of child development results in late-adverse effects (LAEs) [46] including neurocognitive impairments [2]. Clinically significant deficits among ALL survivors are most commonly found in attention [712], working memory [13], processing speed [9, 14, 15] and executive functions, such as verbal fluency and cognitive flexibility [16]. Neurocognitive impairment in childhood ALL survivors persist for many years after treatment [17, 18]. Large survey studies like the Childhood Cancer Survivors Study (CCSS) as well as other studies conducted in childhood ALL survivors [7, 9, 19] have demonstrated higher risk of depression, anxiety, behavioural difficulties, distress, as well as post-traumatic symptoms compared to siblings [2025]. Longitudinal follow-up in long-term survivors have indicated that frequency of distress evolves over time, with more than 10% of survivors experiencing significant increase in depression as well as in anxiety [26].

The childhood ALL survivor population is increasing in size and lifespan, and this specific population needs an effective evaluation and targeted interventions [27]. Thus, better understanding of LAEs and factors contributing to their development is important to guide survivorship health surveillance and strategies to prevent or remediate treatment-related toxicities [2, 3]. Here we assessed the role of genetic factors in neurocognitive impairments as well as in anxiety and depression by interrogating the relationship between above mentioned complications and genotypic profiling of 459 candidate genes obtained through whole exome sequencing (WES) of childhood ALL survivors.

Study population and methods

Discovery cohort

The discovery cohort included 236 patients diagnosed and treated for childhood ALL according to Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL 87–01 to 05–01 protocols at Sainte-Justine University Health Center (SJUHC), Montreal, (Quebec), Canada. The participants were recruited during 2013–2015 in the context of the PETALE study, a multidisciplinary research project with the goal to identify and comprehensively characterize associated predictive biomarkers of long-term treatment related complications in childhood ALL survivors [6]. Eligible participants were younger than 19 years old at diagnosis, at least 5 years after diagnosis of ALL and older than 12 years at evaluation, without history of relapse or refractory ALL or neurological condition or Down syndrome and had not received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The time from end of treatment to evaluation ranged from 5–26 year with a median of 13 years. The patients were classified to standard (SR) and high risk (HR) groups based on prognostic factors, including age, white blood cell count, immunophenotype, and central nervous system (CNS) status at diagnosis [28, 29]. The frequency of patients assigned to SR and HR groups during the treatment was 46.6% and 53.4%, respectively. They were almost exclusively of reported French Canadian descent (>95%). The HapMap genotype reference data [30, 31] was used for Principal component analysis (PCA) [30] to test and confirm predominant European ancestry (S1 Fig).

Replication cohort

The replication cohort consisted of 545 ALL survivors (274 males and 271 females) of European ancestry (based on genotype data) enrolled in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE) study and were evaluated using the same testing procedures as in PETALE cohort. Participants were younger than 19 years old at diagnosis and younger than 40 years old at SJLIFE evaluation, with no diagnosis of neurologic condition or Down syndrome, no history of relapse and had not received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The time from primary cancer diagnosis to the most recent date of neurocognitive evaluation ranged from 10.95–45.60 years with a median of 26.84 years. The risk group assignment during the treatment (SR and HR groups) was not available for this cohort.

Neuropsychological evaluation

A neurocognitive evaluation was performed using standardized testing procedures. It included three indices from two cognitive measures that reflect common impairments among childhood ALL survivors and are also good predictors of general neuropsychological outcomes [32]: Trail Making Test–Condition 4—Letter-Number Sequencing score and Verbal Fluency–Condition 1 –Letter fluency score from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) [33]; and Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) [34] total score. Trail Making Test (D-KEFS) score is a measure that reflects processing speed, psychomotor speed, and cognitive flexibility [35]. Verbal Fluency (D-KEFS) score is a measure of phonological fluency in verbal modality [36]. Digit span (WAIS-IV) total score is a measure of verbal working memory [37]. All raw scores were converted to age-adjusted scaled scores based on population means [38]. The neurocognitive outcomes were transformed into dichotomous variables and studied accordingly. For each of these variables, scores lower than one and a half standard deviations below the mean of the normative dataset were indicative of impairment [39], all other scores were considered non-impaired.

Emotional distress: Anxiety and depression

Participants were classified having emotional distress if they demonstrated elevated symptoms according to two measures referenced to age-specific norms. This was done in line with published recommendations [40, 41] and previous use of the instruments [21, 22, 26]. For younger participants (<19 years), we used anxiety and depression modules of the Beck Youth Inventory (BYI), a self-report instrument to document psychological status in children from 7 to 18 years old [41]. For older participants (≥19 years) we used the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18 anxiety and depression score), an 18-item self-report questionnaire, assessing psychological distress in adults [40], previously also used in cohorts of young and older adult survivors of childhood cancer [42, 43]. Internal consistency coefficients measured by Cronbach’s alphas were all satisfactory, >.80 [44]. Age-adjusted scores one standard deviation above the population mean were considered as impaired.

Sequencing and quality control

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on germline DNA, extracted from peripheral blood samples from a subset of 191 participants of PETALE cohort, using standard protocols as described previously [6]. Whole exomes were captured in solution with Agilent’s SureSelect Human All Exon 50Mb kits and sequenced on either Life Technologies SOLiD System 4.0 (mean coverage = 40X) or Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (mean coverage = 113.1X) at SJUHC integrated clinical genomic centre in pediatrics. Reads were aligned to the hg19 reference genome using SOLiD LifeScope software [45] for the SOLiD samples and BWA-MEM [46] for the samples sequenced on the Illumina system. PICARD [47, 48] was used to mark PCR duplicates and collect sequencing quality control metrics. Variant calling was performed using the Haplotype Caller and quality score recalibration was performed using Variant Recalibrator, both implemented in the Genome Analysis Tool Kit (GATK) [48]. Variants were selected based on the variant quality score (VQSR = PASS) and minimum depth of coverage (DP > = 10). The final germline variants were annotated by ANNOVAR [49] and the predicted functional impact of missense, nonsense and splicing common and rare variants was assessed in silico using Sift (<0.1) and PolyPhen2 (≥0.85) filters [50, 51]. Variants were defined as rare (minor allele frequency, MAF<5%) and common (MAF≥5%) according to the reported frequency for European populations in the 1000 Genomes [52] and ESP6500 datasets [53]. These variants were considered as potentially damaging and were used for analyses. Variants exceeding missing rate of 20%, with minor allele count<2 and not in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (P<0.001) were excluded.

Association analyses

Two sets of candidate genes were selected—the first consisted of 99 genes implicated in the metabolism of methotrexate (MTX) and corticosteroids (CS) which are known to impact neurocognitive outcomes [54, 55] and the second consisted of 360 genes implicated in nervous system function, selected using the KEGG PATHWAY Database [56]. A total of 76 common variants (27 in MTX/CS pathway and 49 in nervous system function) and 1337 rare variants that satisfied all above filtering criteria were identified as functionally predicted and were used in association analyses. The analyses between common genetic variants and neurocognitive outcomes as well as with anxiety/depression were performed by the allelic chi-square or Fisher’s exact test implemented in PLINK v.1.07 [57, 58]. Analyses were performed in 191 sequenced patients and stratified by sex, risk groups with different treatment intensity, and treatment with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and cranial radiation because these factors have an established role in modulating neurocognitive outcomes [4, 59]. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for false discovery rate (FDR) [60, 61] was used to adjust for multiple testing with a cut-off value of < 5% considered statistically significant. Selective genotyping of top-ranking common SNPs (based additionally on Bonferroni p-value corrected for the number of variants tested, p<0.001 and p<0.0019 for the neural and MTX/CS pathways, respectively) was carried out on the Sequenom platform at the McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre, Montreal, (Quebec), Canada, to confirm the results and extend the analysis to entire cohort (n = 236) including one hundred ninety-one patients analysed above (S1 Table). Associations of genotyped variants with the outcomes were assessed using chi-square or Fisher exact test in SPSS v.24.0.0.0 and appropriate genetic models, which were presented relative to the minor allele. Genotype-outcome association was represented as an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). For the variants of MTX pathway for which the association showed similar trend in validation cohort, the modulation of the effect by cumulative drug dose was also analyzed. For that, cumulative drug dose was dichotomized to above and below the median and the association was analyzed in each subgroup. Additionally, logistic regression model was used in which main effect (genotype and drug dose) and interaction term were added. The detailed list of the studied polymorphisms (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8051573), as well as the summary statistics for all polymorphisms analyzed from the sequencing data beyond those already presented in the regular and supplemental tables (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8051825) are provided.

For rare variants associations, we used the SKAT-O test (Optimal Sequence Kernel Association Test) [62, 63] implemented in SKAT package v.1.3.2.1 [64] with FDR < 5% considered statistically significant. Collapsing approach that combines several rare variants into a single variable [65, 66], with iterative exclusion of each single variant, was additionally performed to allow weighting variant contributions to association signals. These analyses were performed as exploratory and associated variants were not further analyzed by genotyping.

Replication analysis

Genotype data for selected variants were obtained from a larger effort to sequence whole-genomes of over three thousand long-term survivors participating in the SJLIFE cohort. For this replication analysis, we restricted inclusion to 545 ALL survivors of European ancestry. Associations of selected variants with respective neurocognitive outcomes were examined using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate, implemented in PLINK 1.9 [57, 58].

Results

Neurocognitive and emotional disturbances

The median age of ALL survivors at the time of evaluation was 21 years, with almost equal sex distribution, their demographics and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. The most prevalent deficit in neurocognitive test performance was noted for digit span (19.5%) followed by verbal fluency (18.6%) and trail making test (9.3%). Moderate-severe anxiety was noted in 10.1% survivors, whereas 11.5% of survivors were affected by moderate-severe depression, which was comparable to published normative groups on anxiety and depression [4042].

Table 1. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics (N = 236).

N %
Sex
Male 115 48.7
Female 121 51.3
Neuropsychological outcomes (affected patients)
Trial making test* 22 9.3
Verbal fluency* 44 18.6
Digit span* 46 19.5
Moderate-severe anxiety 21 10.1
Moderate-severe depression 24 11.5
DFCI protocol
87–01 18 7.6
91–01 48 20.3
95–01 71 30.1
00–01 75 31.8
05–01 24 10.2
Prognostic risk group
Standard risk (SR) 110 46.6
High risk (HR) 126 53.4
Cranial radiation therapy
Yes** 131 55.5
No 105 44.5
Cumulative doses, mg/m2—median (range)
Parenteral/PO MTX (853.6–12750.5) 6576.5
IT MTX (0–279) 150.4
IV/PO corticosteroids*** (4425.7–24930.1) 8826.6
IT corticosteroids*** (2.05–87.19) 31.3
Age at diagnosis—median (range)
Male (1–18) 5.0
Female (0–18) 4.0
Age at follow—up median (range)
Male (12–36) 21.0
Female (12–38) 21.0

DFCI, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; IV, intravenous; PO, per os; IT, intrathecal; MTX, methotrexate

*Score at least 1.5 standard deviation below the norm was considered as impaired in all neuropsychological tests

** Median (range), 12 Gy (12-18Gy)

*** Cumulative corticosteroid doses are calculated as prednisone equivalents

Common variants

Among common variants implicated in nervous system function obtained from WES data, significant associations were detected for four of them (CALML5, CACNB2, PCDHB10 and EPHA5) either in all survivors or following stratification according to sex, risk groups or CRT (S2 Table). These variants were further analyzed by genotyping in the entire PETALE cohort and the association was confirmed for all of them (Table 2). The analyses were performed for the same subgroups for which association was noted for WES data, and additionally in all participants. The neurocognitive deficit related to digit span task was associated in an additive manner with the minor allele of rs58225473 in CACNB2 gene either in all patients (p = 0.02), or those who received chemotherapy only (p = 0.004). Homozygotes for the minor C allele of CALML5 rs10904516 were at higher risk of having deficit in verbal fluency score, whereas the neurocognitive deficit related to trail making test was associated with the minor allele of rs2907323 in PCDHB10 gene, both potentiated in HR participants (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01 respectively). The carriers of the minor C allele of EPHA5 rs33932471 were at higher risk of both moderate-severe anxiety and depression, with the strongest effects seen in females (p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively).

Table 2. Frequency of associated genotypes in patients with and without neurocognitive or emotional distress, genes of relevance for nervous system function, PETALE cohort (N = 236).

Outcome Genotype Case*, N (%) Control*, N (%) Model Case*, N (%) Control*, N (%) P** OR
(95%-CI)
Digit span CACNB2 rs58225473
All patients
TT 25 (58.1) 128 (71.5) TT 25 (58.1) 128 (71.5) 0.02a 2.0
(1.1–3.9) 
TG 16 (37.2) 51 (28.5) TG 16 (37.2) 51 (28.5)
GG 2 (4.7) 0 (0.0) GG 2 (4.7) 0 (0.0)
Chemotherapy only***
TT 4 (40.0) 63 (70.8) TT 4 (40.0) 63 (70.8) 0.004a 5.0
(1.5–16.4) 
TG 4 (40.0) 26 (29.2) TG 4 (40.0) 26 (29.2)
GG 2 (20.0) 0 (0.0) GG 2 (20.0) 0 (0.0)
PCDHB10 rs2907323
Trial making test All patients
GG 11 (55.0) 155 (73.1) GG 11 (55.0) 155 (73.1)
GC 8 (40.0) 57 (26.9) GC 8 (40.0) 57 (26.9) 0.02a 2.5
CC 1 (5.0) 0 (0.0) CC 1 (5.0) 0 (0.0) (1.1–6.2)
High risk
GG 6 (46.2) 85 (76.6) GG 6 (46.2) 85 (76.6)
GC 6 (46.2) 26 (23.4) GC 6 (46.2) 26 (23.4) 0.01a 4.3
CC 1 (7.7) 0 (0.0) CC 1 (7.7) 0 (0.0) (1.4–12.7)
Verbal fluency CALML5 rs10904516
All patients
TT 18 (40.9) 93 (48.7) TT+TC 37 (84.1) 178 (93.2) 0.05r 2.6
(1.0–6.9)
TC 19 (43.2) 85 (44.5)
CC 7 (15.9) 13 (6.8) CC 7 (15.9) 13 (6.8)
High risk
TT 8 (34.8) 52 (50.5) TT+TC 18 (78.3) 96 (93.2) 0.03r 3.8
(1.1–13.3)
TC 10 (43.5) 44 (42.7)
CC 5 (21.7) 7 (6.8) CC 5 (21.7) 7 (6.8)
Moderate-severe anxiety EPHA5 rs33932471
Females
AA 5 (55.6) 82 (89.1) AA 5 (55.6) 82 (89.1) 0.02d 6.6
(1.5–28.5)
AC 4 (44.4) 8 (8.7) AC+CC 4 (44.4) 10 (10.9)
CC 0 (0.0) 2 (2.2)
Moderate-severe depression EPHA5 rs33932471
All patients
AA 15 (78.9) 151 (88.8) AA 15 (71.4) 151 (88.8) 0.03d 3.2
(1.1–9.2)
AC 6 (28.6) 17 (10.0) AC+CC 6 (28.6) 19 (11.2)
CC 0 (0.0) 2 (1.2)
Females
AA 7 (58.3) 80 (89.9) AA 7 (58.3) 80 (89.9) 0.003d 6.3 (1.7–24.2)
AC 5 (41.7) 7 (7.9) AC+CC 5 (41.7) 9 (10.1)
CC 0 (0.0) 2 (2.2)

CACNB2: Calcium Voltage-Gated Channel Auxiliary Subunit Beta2; CALML5: Calmodulin Like 5, EPHA5: EPH Receptor A5, Brain-Specific Kinase; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

*Participants with and without indicated complications are defined as cases and controls, respectively.

**P values are calculated by chi-square or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The most representative genetic model used is indicated (a: Additive; d: Dominant, r: Recessive).

***Chemotherapy without cranial radiation therapy.

Among common variants implicated in MTX/CS pathway obtained from WES data, the significant associations were detected for 6 of them (MTR, PPARA, ABCC3, SHMT1 and SLCO1B1, (S3 Table). The variants in MTR, PPARA, ABCC3 and SLCO1B1 genes were further analyzed by genotyping in entire PETALE cohort and the association was confirmed for all of them (Table 3). The association between deficit in verbal fluency score and GG genotype of MTR rs1805087 was seen for all survivors (p = 0.01) and male participants (p = 0.002). Deficits in verbal fluency performance were also associated with GG genotype of ABCC3 rs12604031 among HR patients (p = 0.001) as well as with rs1800206 in PPARA gene in low risk groups (p = 0.008). The risk of moderate-severe depression was highest among carriers of the minor G allele of SLCO1B1 rs4149056 who received chemotherapy only (p = 0.002).

Table 3. Frequency of associated genotypes in patients with and without neurocognitive or emotional distress, genes implicated in methotrexate and corticosteroids pathways, PETALE cohort (N = 236).

Outcome Genotype Case*, N (%) Control*, N (%) Model Case*, N (%) Control*, N (%) P** OR
(95%-CI)
Verbal fluency MTR rs1805087
All patients
AA 25 (61.0) 120 (66.7) AA+AG 37 (90.2) 178 (98.9) 0.01r 9.6
(1.7–54.5)
AG 12 (29.2) 58 (32.2)
GG 4 (9.8) 2 (1.1) GG 4 (9.8) 2 (1.1)
Males
AA 12 (52.2) 57 (66.3) AA+AG 19 (82.6) 86 (100.0) 0.002r  
AG 7 (30.4) 29 (33.7)
GG 4 (17.4) 0 (0.0) GG 4 (17.4) 0 (0.0)
PPARA rs1800206
Standard risk
CC 13 (72.7) 76 (92.7) CC 13 (72.7) 76 (92.7) 0.008a 4.6
(1.5–14.5)
CG 3 (16.7) 6 (7.3) CG 3 (16.7) 6 (7.3)
GG 2 (11.1) 0 (0.0) GG 2 (11.1) 0 (0.0)
Chemotherapy only
CC 12 (75.0) 77 (92.8) CC 12 (75.0) 77 (92.8) 0.02a 4.3
(1.3–13.5)
CG 2 (12.5) 6 (7.2) CG 2 (12.5) 6 (7.2)
GG 2 (12.5) 0 (0.0) GG 2 (12.5) 0 (0.0)
ABCC3 rs12604031
High risk
AA 3 (13.0) 33 (33.3) AA+AG 14 (60.9) 89 (89.9) 0.001r 5.7
(2.0–16.5)
AG 11 (47.8) 56 (56.6)
GG 9 (39.1) 10 (10.1) GG 9 (39.1) 10 (10.1)
Moderate-severe depression SLCO1B1 rs4149056
Chemotherapy only
AA 1 (14.3) 59 (75.6 AA 1 (14.3) 59 (76.5) 0.002d 18.6
(2.1–164.7)
AG 5 (71.4) 19 (24.4) AG+GG 6 (85.7) 19 (24.4)
GG 1 (14.3) 0 (0.0)

MTR: 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate-Homocysteine Methyltransferase, PPARA: Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Alpha, ABCC3: ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 3, SLCO1B1: Solute Carrier Organic Anion Transporter Family Member 1B1.

*Participants with and without indicated complications are defined as cases and controls, respectively.

**P values are calculated by chi-square or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The most representative genetic model used is indicated (a: Additive; d: Dominant, r: Recessive).

All variants found significantly associated with tested outcome (except those initially confined to risk subgroup such as those in ABCC3 and PCDHB10 genes) were further analyzed for an association with respective outcomes in an independent cohort of ALL survivors (SJLIFE cohort) (Tables 4 and 5). Two associations were noticeable. The association of borderline significance between deficit in verbal fluency score and the minor allele of MTR rs1805087 was seen in all survivors (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0–2.8; p = 0.05). The association between deficit in digit span score and GG genotype of CACNB2 rs58225473 showed similar trend as in PETALE cohort for all participants (OR = 3.7, 95% CI, 1.0–13.9), as well as for patients who received chemotherapy only (OR = 3.8, 95% CI, 0.9–16.5), however they did not reach significance (p = 0.08 and 0.09, respectively). The associations for rs58225473 and rs1805087 variants in CACNB2 and MTR genes were significant for combined PETALE and SJLIFE cohorts (S4 Table). The association between deficit in digit span score and GG genotype of CACNB2 rs58225473 was significant for all participants (OR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.25–11; p = 0.01) and for patients who received chemotherapy only (OR = 7.2, 95% CI, 2.1–25; p = 0.0004). The association between deficit in verbal fluency score and the minor allele of MTR rs1805087 was seen in all survivors (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1–2.3; p = 0.04) and in male participants (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1–3.1; p = 0.04).

Table 4. Frequency of genotypes in patients with and without neurocognitive or emotional distress, genes of relevance for nervous system function, replication cohort of SJLIFE (N = 545).

Outcome Genotype Case*N (%) Control* N (%) Model Case* N (%) Control* N (%) P** OR (95%-CI)
Digit span CACNB2 rs58225473
All patients
TT 23 (71.8) 279 (69.1) TT+TG 29 (90.6) 393 (97.3) 0.08r 3.7 (1.0–13.9)
TG 6 (18.8) 114 (28.2)
GG 3 (9.4) 11 (2.7) GG 3 (9.4) 11 (2.7)
Chemotherapy only
TT 16 (66.7) 112 (67.1) TT+TG 21 (87.5) 161 (96.4) 0.09r 3.8 (0.9–16.5)
TG 5 (20.8) 49 (29.3)
GG 3 (12.5) 6 (3.6) GG 3 (12.5) 6 (3.6)
Verbal fluency CALML5 rs10904516
All patients
TT 32 (45.7) 180 (40.0) TT+TC 62 (88.6) 387 (86.0) 0.6r 0.8 (0.4–1.7)
TC 30 (42.9) 207 (46.0)
CC 8 (11.4) 63 (14.0) CC 8 (11.4) 63 (14.0)
Moderate-severe anxiety EPHA5 rs33932471
Females
AA 27 (84.4) 205 (87.2) AA 27 (84.4) 205 (87.2) 0.7d 1.3 (0.5–3.5)
AC 5 (15.6) 27 (11.5) AC+CC 5 (15.6) 30 (12.8)
CC 0 (0.0) 3 (1.3)
Moderate-severe depression EPHA5 rs33932471
All patients
AA 58 (79.5) 399 (86.0) AA 58 (79.5) 399 (86.0) 0.1d 1.6 (0.8–3.0)
AC 15 (20.5) 60 (12.9) AC+CC 15 (20.5) 65 (14.0)
CC 0 (0.0) 5 (1.1)
Females
AA 30 (90.9) 202 (86.3) AA 30 (9.9) 202 (86.3) 0.5d 0.6 (0.2–2.2)
AC 3 (9.1) 29 (12.4) AC+CC 3 (9.1) 32 (13.7)
CC 0 (0.0) 3 (1.3)

*Participants with and without indicated complications are defined as cases and controls, respectively

**P values are calculated by chi-square or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The most representative genetic model used is indicated (d: Dominant, r: Recessive).

Table 5. Frequency of genotypes in patients with and without neurocognitive or emotional distress, genes implicated in methotrexate and corticosteroids pathways, replication cohort of SJLIFE (N = 545).

Outcome Genotype Case* N (%) Control* N (%) Model Case* N (%) Control* N (%) P** OR (95%-CI)
Verbal fluency MTR rs1805087
All patients
AA 42 (59.2) 323 (70.7) AG+GG 29 (40.8) 134 (29.3) 0.05d 1.7(1.0–2.8)
AG 25(35.2) 121 (26.5)
GG 4 (5.6) 13 (2.8) AA 42 (59.2) 323 (70.7)
Males
AA 23 (60.5) 164 (72.2) AG+GG 15 (39.5) 63 (27.8) 0.1d 1.7 (0.8–3.5) 
AG 13 (34.2) 56 (24.7)
GG 2 (5.3) 7 (3.1) AA 23 (60.5) 164 (72.2)
PPARA rs1800206
Chemotherapy only
CC 39 (81.2) 155 (85.6) CC 39 (73.8) 155 (85.6) 0.5d 1.4 (0.6–3.2)
CG 9 (18.8) 26 (14.4) CG+GG 9 (23.8) 26 (14.4)
GG 0 (0) 0 (0)
Moderate-severe depression SLCO1B1 rs4149056
Chemotherapy only
AA 31 (73.8) 142 (72.4) AA 31 (73.8) 142 (72.4) 0.9d 0.9 (0.4–2.0)
AG 10 (23.8) 48 (24.5) AG+GG 11 (26.2) 54 (27.6)
GG 1 (2.4) 6 (3.1)

*Participants with and without indicated complications are defined as cases and controls, respectively

**P values are calculated by chi-square or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The most representative genetic model used is indicated (d: Dominant).

Given that the MTR belongs to the MTX pathway, we further explored whether the effect of rs1805087 was modulated by cumulative MTX doses, for which such data were available in the discovery group (Table 1). The relationship with the deficit in verbal fluency score was particularly obvious in patients who received higher overall cumulative doses (Fig 1, p = 0.01 for patients with cumulative doses above median vs. p = 0.3, for patients with cumulative doses below median).

Fig 1. Interaction between MTR rs1805087 and cumulative methotrexate dose.

Fig 1

The frequency of each genotype in affected and non-affected group defined by verbal fluency score is presented by black and gray bars, respectively, in the groups that received cumulative MTX below median (left panel) or above median (right panel). The number of individuals represented by each bar and p values are indicted on the plot. OR for interaction is 3.3, 95% CI 0.9–11.5, p = 0.07, as derived from logistic regression model including MTR genotype, cumulative MTX dose and interaction term.

Rare variants

The analysis of functionally predicted rare variants in PETALE cohort led to the detection of an association between the deficit in trail making test score and rare variants enrichment in SLCO2B1, HSPA4 and GSTT1 genes (p = 0.0002, p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively, Table 6). Using the collapsing approach, we explored variant combinations that contributed to the observed association signal, identifying two variants in GSTT1, three in HSPA4 and four in SLCO2B1 gene. Replication analyses were not performed for these findings because information regarding these variants was not available in the SJLIFE cohort.

Table 6. SKAT-O analysis of the rare functional variants, PETALE cohort, WES data, demonstrated for the deficit in trail making test scores (N = 191).

Outcome Gene SNPs tested MAF P value FDR OR1 [95% CI]
position rs number
Trail making test SLCO2B1 chr11:74875089–74875089   0.009 0.0002 0.004 8.7 [1.3–57.0]
chr11:74880370–74880370 rs35199625 0.008
chr11:74899276–74899276 rs377133671 0.003
HSPA4 *chr5:132387979–132387979 rs61745470 0.017 0.004 0.027 *7.8 [1.7–36.4]
chr5:132408967–132408967 rs61755724 0.042
*chr5:132412511–132412511   0.003
*chr5:132437499–132437499 rs61749631 0.005
GSTT1 chr22:24379402–24379402 rs11550605 0.003 0.003 0.027 19.7 [1.7–230.6]
chr22:24381742–24381742   0.006

SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; SLCO2B1: Solute Carrier Organic Anion Transporter Family Member 2B1; HSPA4: Heat Shock Protein Family A (Hsp70) Member 4; GSTT1: Glutathione S-Transferase Theta 1. Individual contribution of variant rs61745470 (noted in bold) was identified with OR = 19.5, 95%CI [2.97–128], p = 0.005.

1 OR of significant combination, combination include all variants or variants noted with asterisk*.

Discussion

Functionally predicted germline common variants in MTR, PPARA, SLCO1B1, ABCC3, CALML5, CACNB2 and PCDHB10 genes were found to be significantly associated with deficits in neurocognitive tests performance, whereas a variant in EPHA5 gene was significantly associated with both anxiety and depression.

Neurocognitive performance

Among common variants associated with an impairment in neurocognitive function, rs10904516 in the MTR gene, which was associated with a deficit in verbal fluency, seems particularly interesting given similar observation in the SJLIFE cohort. The MTR gene encodes a B12 dependent methionine synthase involved in remethylation of homocysteine (Hcy), which is the crucial step in methionine production in all types of cells [67]. Mutations in the MTR gene as well as severe deficiency of vitamin B12 could result in elevated concentration of Hcy in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. Studies have shown that Hcy exerts a neurotoxic action and may participate in the mechanisms of neurodegeneration, such as excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, calcium accumulation, and apoptosis[6870]. MTR gene is involved in the metabolic pathway of MTX. Administration of MTX was associated with acute and subacute neurotoxic effects; these detrimental effects may accumulate over time [69]. The detected common functional polymorphism (rs1805087) leading to Asp919Gly amino acid replacement in the MTR gene could affect enzymatic activity, thus increasing the level of Hcy [68, 69, 71]. Indeed, we have shown interaction between MTR rs1805087 and cumulative MTX dose in survivors with the deficit in verbal fluency score. This confirms previous finding: this variant together with polymorphisms of other genes that are implicated in the Hcy pathway were already studied in the context of MTX long-term neurotoxicity and has been found to affect neurocognitive function in childhood ALL survivors [72, 73].

CACNB2 rs58225473 variant was associated with the neurocognitive deficit as defined by digit span test, which measures working memory. Similar risk values, although not significant, were noted in the SJLIFE cohort in all participants and in the group of survivors who received chemotherapy only. The CACNB2 gene encodes an auxiliary voltage-dependent subunit of L-type calcium-channel that is mainly expressed in brain and heart tissue. Voltage-dependent calcium channels are crucial for neuronal differentiation and maturation; they induce large number of intracellular events such as neurotransmitter release, neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity and gene regulation [74]. Calcium influx mediated by those channels has both spatial and temporal components and encodes important signaling information [75]. Moreover, in a recent GWAS study CACNB2 was identified among four significant risk loci underlying genetic effects shared between five major psychiatric disorders that included schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, bipolar and major depressive disorders [76]. Additionally, the rare variants in this gene were found in affected members of families with autism spectrum disease [77]. Given important role that CACNB2 can play, it is not surprising that it was studied as a possible pharmacological target in treatment of mental disorders [78]. The rs58225473 is c.1803T>G substitution (NM_201590.2) leading to Asp601Glu replacement, which is predicted to affect protein function and possibly calcium channel function. Common variants in several other genes influenced neurocognitive decline in PETALE cohort. PPARA gene belongs to PPARs receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors involved in the regulation of inflammation [79]. Effects of glucocorticoids can be reinforced by PPAR ligands [80]. The enhanced heterodimer formations of PPARA could be associated with increased expression of brain and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factors [81]. The rs1800206 variant in PPARA gene was associated with lower verbal fluency score in females and survivors assigned to SR group or chemotherapy only. Similar association was noted for ABCC3 rs12604031. ABCC3 is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, and the bioavailability of MTX may be affected by this transporter [82].

CALML5 gene is related to the calmodulin family of calcium binding proteins highly implicated in CNS function [83]. Its protective role and implication in inhibition of neuronal death was described in Alzheimer disease [84, 85]. We observed the significant association of variant rs10904516 and deficit in verbal fluency score in all survivors with the stronger effect seen in the HR group. Similar association mostly confined to HR group was noted between lower score on trial making test and rs2907323 in the PCDHB10 gene. PCDH (protocadherin) genes, are expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems and are required for their normal development. They mediate a variety of processes, including neuronal survival, morphogenesis and connectivity, synaptic maintenance, and spatial patterning of axons and dendrites [86]. The variants in PCDH genes have been reported to be associated with dyslexia and bipolar disorder [87, 88].

The neurotoxic effects of treatments in childhood ALL have been the subject of multiple investigations. These effects consist of central neurotoxicity clearly noticeable by encephalopathy and/or neurodevelopmental cognitive deficits [8991], particularly in survivors exposed to a highly intensified treatment protocols with CNS-directed chemotherapy, even in the absence of CRT [4, 19, 92, 93]. Cognitive impairment and information processing have been associated with intensity and duration of CS treatment [94, 95]. Female survivors were reported to have more severe short-term memory impairment [59] and lower scores on attentional indices, cognitive flexibility [96, 97] and visuomotor control [4]. Female childhood ALL survivors are more likely to present cerebral white matter damage [98] that may affect cognitive functioning. Congruent with these previous observations, several associations detected in the present study were modulated by sex and treatment intensity (reflected by presence or not of CRT or risk groups).

Anxiety and depression

We studied dimensions of internalized symptoms which are frequent in normative populations, namely anxiety and depression [99], highlighting impairment in mental quality of life of childhood ALL survivors [21, 22, 100]. Although anxiety and depression measures are not equivalent to clinical diagnosis derived from the gold standard systematic interview [101], moderate-severe levels are generally interpreted as a risk for having clinically relevant anxiety or depression.

The rs11556218 in the EPHA5 gene was associated with higher risk of both anxiety and depression that was further potentiated in female patients. The EPHA5 gene codes for a brain-specific kinase that is selectively expressed in a subset of serotonin neurons during embryonic and postnatal development [102]. Receptors in the EPH subfamily modify the strength of existing synapses in the adult brain [103]. Divergent vulnerabilities between females and males could be explained by gender differences in brain maturation [104, 105], which might make females more vulnerable to the neurotoxic effects of chemotherapy. Other assumptions, such as endocrine factors, have also been hypothesized to explain sex differences in the susceptibility [59].

Moreover, we identified the association between depression and the presence of variant rs4149056 in SLCO1B1 gene. This association was detected in the group of survivors that received chemotherapy without CRT. SLCO1B1 gene encodes a liver-specific member of the organic anion transporter family involved in hepatic uptake of MTX. This association deserved further attention given that the same variant was detected through genome wide association studies to contribute to inter-individual variability in the clearance of high-dose MTX [106]. It was subsequently replicated in independent cohorts and shown also as a predictor of short-term toxicity following MTX treatment [106111]. MTX treatment has been associated with adverse emotional or behavioral outcomes [20], thus these results could justify further studies of SLCO1B1 gene in related contexts.

Rare variants’ analysis

The association between deficits in the trail making test score was identified in relation to rare variants enrichment in HSPA4, SLCO2B1 and GSTT1 genes, with a very strong individual contribution of rs61745470 in HSPA4 gene. This variant was recently associated with familial genetic risk for suicide (as well as with risk for psychiatric or substance abuse conditions) [112]. The SLCO2B1 and GSTT1 genes are highly implicated in physiological and pharmacological distribution of drugs and endogenous molecules. The SLCO2B1, a member of the organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) family, is involved in steroid hormone uptake and transport of steroid conjugates [113, 114]. GSTT1 was recently associated with higher risk for early onset of severe mental and bipolar disorders [115]. We also evaluated the association of deletion polymorphisms of GSTT1[116] (found with the frequency of 23.7% in discovery cohort) with the deficits in the trail making test score. There was no association of GSTT1 null genotype with the deficits in the trail making test score.

The impact of here identified rare functional variants requires further investigation.

Concluding remarks

Our study has certain limitations. Its limited sample size may affect the accuracy of the results, particularly in the context of the stratified analysis. Other unmeasured factors in this study, for example, inflammation and oxidative stress, could modulate or potentiate association with genetic factors. The candidate gene approach may have missed genetic markers potentially involved in neurocognitive decline and mood disturbances that could have been detected through unbiased approaches. Among associations detected in the PETALE cohort only two showed a similar trend in SJLIFE cohort. Despite matching both outcomes and patients’ characteristics between the two cohorts, it is possible that small sample size, differences in treatment protocols or time of ALL diagnosis [117120] contributed to the observed discrepancies. Likewise, stratification by risk group designation was not available for the SJLIFE cohort, precluding replication of the risk-based stratified analyses. Although the analyses in PETALE cohort were corrected for multiple testing, and confounding was reduced due to homogeneous population and uniform treatment, we cannot exclude that some of the associations have been obtained by chance.

In conclusion, using a comprehensive candidate gene approach and whole exome sequencing data we identified a panel of functionally predicted genetic variants significantly associated with neurocognitive deficits, anxiety and depression in childhood ALL survivors. Additional exome wide analysis might lead to the discovery of novel genes and genetic variants associated with neurocognitive LAEs as well as with the mood disorders.

While we acknowledge that the identified germline variants still need to be evaluated and validated through replication and functional studies, the current findings can help further understanding of the influence of genetic component on long-term complications related to cancer therapy.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Principal component analysis (PCA).

PCA analysis comparing sequencing data of 400 leukemia patients (including PETALE cohort) from Sainte-Justine University Health Center (SJUHC) to the HapMap genotype reference data (release 23) for Europeans (EUR), East Asians (EAS) and Africans (AFR).

PC1, Principal Component 1; PC2, Principal Component 2.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Genotyping: Identity of polymorphisms, details of PCR and ASO hybridization.

R, reverse, F, forward. The base substitution that distinguishes the two variants of each polymorphism is given in bold for ASO probes. dbSNP number is provided. Ancestral allele is given in bold and minor allele is underlined. The polymorphisms are presented as a change from ancestral to derived allele, unless ancestral allele is not known, when the change is given from major to minor allele. SNPs in coding region leading or not to amino-acid substitutions are indicated.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Significant results of association study of common variants from the candidate genes of relevance for nervous system function, PETALE cohort, WES data (n = 191).

aAssociation test based on comparing allele frequencies between cases and controls. All associations have FDR-BH (Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate) lower than 5%. All also have p value lower than 0.001, which is Bonferroni cut-off value for the number of variants tested in nervous system function pathway.

bStratified analyses according to sex and treatment intensity (standard vs high risk); chemotherapy only vs chemotherapy and cranial radiation therapy (CRT).

Ref: reference allele; Var: variant allele; MAF: minor allele frequency, PCDHB10, protocadherin beta 10, CALML5: Calmodulin Like 5, CACNB2: Calcium Voltage-Gated Channel Auxiliary Subunit Beta2, EPHA5: EPH Receptor A5, Brain-Specific Kinase.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Results of association study of common variants from methotrexate and corticosteroids pathways, PETALE cohort, WES data (n = 191).

aAssociation test based on comparing allele frequencies between cases and controls. All associations have FDR-BH (Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate) lower than 5%.

bStratified analyses according to sex and treatment intensity (standard vs high risk); chemotherapy only vs chemotherapy and cranial radiation therapy (CRT).

c SNPs or associations that did not qualify for genotyping with p value higher than 0.0019 (Bonferroni cut-off value for the number of genes tested in MTX/CS pathway).

Ref: reference allele; Var: variant allele; MAF: minor allele frequency; MTR: 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate-Homocysteine Methyltransferase, PPARA: Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Alpha, ABCC3: ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 3, SHMT1: Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase 1, ADORA3: Adenosine Receptor A3, SLCO1B1: Solute Carrier Organic Anion Transporter.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. The combined cohort represents the pooled samples from the discovery PETALE cohort and replication SJLIFE cohort (N = 781). Combined cohort analysis was performed for the variants in CACNB2 and MTR genes.

*Participants with and without indicated complications are defined as cases and controls, respectively.

**P values are calculated by Chi-square. The most representative genetic model used is indicated (d: Dominant, r: Recessive).

***Chemotherapy without cranial radiation therapy.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all childhood ALL survivors and their parents for the participation in the PETALE study, as well as all study collaborators for their valuable contribution.

Abbreviations

ALL

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PETALE

Prévenir les Effets tardifs des Traitements de la leucémie Aiguë Lymphoblastique chez l’Enfant

SJUHC

Sainte-Justine University Health Center

LAEs

Late adverse effects

WES

Whole exome sequencing

DFCI

Dana-Faber Cancer Institute

CCSS

Childhood Cancer Survivors Study

SJLIFE

St-Jude Lifetime cohort

CRT

Cranial radiation therapy

D-KEFS

Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

WAIS-IV

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition

BYI

Beck Youth Inventory

BSI-18

Brief Symptom Inventory-18

MAF

Minor allele frequency

MTX

methotrexate

CS

corticosteroids

SKAT-O test

Optimal Sequence Kernel Association Test

FDR

False discovery rate

SNP

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SR

standard risk

HR

high risk

OR

odds ratio

CI

confidence interval

CNS

central nervous system

OATP

organic anion transporting polypeptide

Data Availability

The raw data used in this manuscript are available upon request because they contain sensitive patient information. The restrictions upon the data are imposed by the President of the ethics committee at CHU Sainte Justine. Interested researchers can contact the following authors and data access committee members: Dr. M. Krajinovic, Director of Pharmacogenomics lab at maja.krajinovic@umontreal.ca; Dr. S. Lippe at sarah.lippe@umontreal.ca; and Dr. S. Sultan serge.sultan@umontreal.ca. They may also contact the President of the ethics committee at CHU Sainte Justine, G. Cardinal by email genevieve.cardinal.hsj@ssss.gouv.qc.ca or mail at Sainte-Justine University Health Center (SJUHC) 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal (Quebec), Canada, H3T 1C5. A detailed list of studied polymorphisms is fully available to the public at Figshare (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8051573) as well as the summary statistics for all polymorphisms analyzed from the sequencing data beyond those presented in the manuscript and supplemental materials (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8051825).

Funding Statement

Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant number: 118694 awarded to Dr Daniel Sinnett, Dr Maja Krajinovic, Dr Caroline Laverdière, Dr Philippe Robaey, Dr Sarah Lippé, Dr Serge Sultan (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/); C17 Council, Cancer Research Society (CRS), Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (CCSRI), Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario (POGO), Garron Family Cancer Centre at SickKids Hospital (Ontario), The Terry Fox foundation, grant number: TFF - 105266 awarded to Dr Daniel Sinnett and Dr Maja Krajinovic (https://www.terryfox.org/), FRQS Applied Medical Genetics Network and Sainte-Justine Hospital Foundation supported the PETALE study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Bhojwani D, Yang JJ, Pui CH. Biology of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62(1):47–60. 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ward E, DeSantis C, Robbins A, Kohler B, Jemal A. Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):83–103. 10.3322/caac.21219 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30. Epub 2016/01/09. 10.3322/caac.21332 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buizer AI, de Sonneville LM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Veerman AJ. Chemotherapy and attentional dysfunction in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: effect of treatment intensity. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;45(3):281–90. 10.1002/pbc.20397 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hudson MM, Ness KK, Gurney JG, Mulrooney DA, Chemaitilly W, Krull KR, et al. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer. JAMA. 2013;309(22):2371–81. 10.1001/jama.2013.6296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marcoux S, Drouin S, Laverdiere C, Alos N, Andelfinger GU, Bertout L, et al. The PETALE study: Late adverse effects and biomarkers in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(6). Epub 2016/12/06. 10.1002/pbc.26361 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Campbell LK, Scaduto M, Sharp W, Dufton L, Van Slyke D, Whitlock JA, et al. A meta-analysis of the neurocognitive sequelae of treatment for childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(1):65–73. 10.1002/pbc.20860 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ashford J, Schoffstall C, Reddick WE, Leone C, Laningham FH, Glass JO, et al. Attention and working memory abilities in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2010;116(19):4638–45. 10.1002/cncr.25343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Iyer NS, Balsamo LM, Bracken MB, Kadan-Lottick NS. Chemotherapy-only treatment effects on long-term neurocognitive functioning in childhood ALL survivors: a review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2015;126(3):346–53. 10.1182/blood-2015-02-627414 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kingma A, van Dommelen RI, Mooyaart EL, Wilmink JT, Deelman BG, Kamps WA. Slight cognitive impairment and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities but normal school levels in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia with chemotherapy only. J Pediatr. 2001;139(3):413–20. 10.1067/mpd.2001.117066 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lofstad GE, Reinfjell T, Hestad K, Diseth TH. Cognitive outcome in children and adolescents treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with chemotherapy only. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(1):180–6. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01055.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodgers J, Marckus R, Kearns P, Windebank K. Attentional ability among survivors of leukaemia treated without cranial irradiation. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(2):147–50. 10.1136/adc.88.2.147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Daams M, Schuitema I, van Dijk BW, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Veerman AJ, van den Bos C, et al. Long-term effects of cranial irradiation and intrathecal chemotherapy in treatment of childhood leukemia: a MEG study of power spectrum and correlated cognitive dysfunction. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:84 10.1186/1471-2377-12-84 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3517522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Edelmann MN, Krull KR, Liu W, Glass JO, Ji Q, Ogg RJ, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and neurocognition in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 11):2973–83. 10.1093/brain/awu230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mennes M, Stiers P, Vandenbussche E, Vercruysse G, Uyttebroeck A, De Meyer G, et al. Attention and information processing in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with chemotherapy only. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;44(5):478–86. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carey ME, Haut MW, Reminger SL, Hutter JJ, Theilmann R, Kaemingk KL. Reduced frontal white matter volume in long-term childhood leukemia survivors: a voxel-based morphometry study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(4):792–7. 10.3174/ajnr.A0904 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cole PD, Kamen BA. Delayed neurotoxicity associated with therapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2006;12(3):174–83. 10.1002/mrdd.20113 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Krull KR, Brinkman TM, Li C, Armstrong GT, Ness KK, Srivastava DK, et al. Neurocognitive outcomes decades after treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the St Jude lifetime cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(35):4407–15. Epub 2013/11/06. 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.2315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cheung YT, Krull KR. Neurocognitive outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on contemporary treatment protocols: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;53:108–20. Epub 2015/04/11. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schultz KA, Ness KK, Whitton J, Recklitis C, Zebrack B, Robison LL, et al. Behavioral and social outcomes in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3649–56. 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2486 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zeltzer LK, Recklitis C, Buchbinder D, Zebrack B, Casillas J, Tsao JC, et al. Psychological status in childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(14):2396–404. 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Michel G, Rebholz CE, von der Weid NX, Bergstraesser E, Kuehni CE. Psychological distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer: the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1740–8. 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4534 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stuber ML, Meeske KA, Krull KR, Leisenring W, Stratton K, Kazak AE, et al. Prevalence and predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):e1124–34. 10.1542/peds.2009-2308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baytan B, Asut C, Cirpan Kantarcioglu A, Sezgin Evim M, Gunes AM. Health-Related Quality of Life, Depression, Anxiety, and Self-Image in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Survivors. Turk J Haematol. 2016;33(4):326–30. Epub 2016/04/21. 10.4274/tjh.2015.0356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pepin AJ, Lippe S, Krajinovic M, Laverdiere C, Michon B, Sinnett D, et al. How to interpret high levels of distress when using the Distress Thermometer in the long-term follow-up clinic? A study with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia survivors. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017;34(3):133–7. Epub 2017/09/19. 10.1080/08880018.2017.1338805 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brinkman TM, Zhu L, Zeltzer LK, Recklitis CJ, Kimberg C, Zhang N, et al. Longitudinal patterns of psychological distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(5):1373–81. 10.1038/bjc.2013.428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bitsko MJ, Cohen D, Dillon R, Harvey J, Krull K, Klosky JL. Psychosocial Late Effects in Pediatric Cancer Survivors: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(2):337–43. 10.1002/pbc.25773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moghrabi A, Levy DE, Asselin B, Barr R, Clavell L, Hurwitz C, et al. Results of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Protocol 95–01 for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109(3):896–904. Epub 2006/09/28. 10.1182/blood-2006-06-027714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Silverman LB, Stevenson KE, O'Brien JE, Asselin BL, Barr RD, Clavell L, et al. Long-term results of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium protocols for children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (1985–2000). Leukemia. 2010;24(2):320–34. Epub 2009/12/18. 10.1038/leu.2009.253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zheng X, Levine D, Shen J, Gogarten SM, Laurie C, Weir BS. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(24):3326–8. Epub 2012/10/13. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.PLINK: Whole genome data analysis toolset 2018. Available from: http://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/plink/index.shtml.
  • 32.Krull KR, Okcu MF, Potter B, Jain N, Dreyer Z, Kamdar K, et al. Screening for neurocognitive impairment in pediatric cancer long-term survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4138–43. 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.8864 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Delis DC KE, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). Psychological Corporation; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.D W. Wechsler adult intelligence scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). San Antonio, TX: 2008.
  • 35.Yochim B, Baldo J, Nelson A, Delis DC. D-KEFS Trail Making Test performance in patients with lateral prefrontal cortex lesions. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13(4):704–9. Epub 2007/05/25. 10.1017/S1355617707070907 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Holdnack J. Reliability and validity of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System: an update. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10(2):301–3. Epub 2004/03/12. 10.1017/S1355617704102191 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Erdodi LA, Abeare CA, Lichtenstein JD, Tyson BT, Kucharski B, Zuccato BG, et al. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) processing speed scores as measures of noncredible responding: The third generation of embedded performance validity indicators. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(2):148–57. Epub 2016/04/29. 10.1037/pas0000319 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Harrison AG, Armstrong IT, Harrison LE, Lange RT, Iverson GL. Comparing Canadian and American normative scores on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;29(8):737–46. Epub 2014/10/15. 10.1093/arclin/acu048 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boulet-Craig A, Robaey P, Laniel J, Bertout L, Drouin S, Krajinovic M, et al. DIVERGT screening procedure predicts general cognitive functioning in adult long-term survivors of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A PETALE study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65(9):e27259 Epub 2018/05/26. 10.1002/pbc.27259 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) 18: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Beck JS BA, Jolly JB, Steer RA. Beck Youth Inventories-Second Edition for children and adolescent’s manual. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Recklitis CJ, Parsons SK, Shih MC, Mertens A, Robison LL, Zeltzer L. Factor structure of the brief symptom inventory—18 in adult survivors of childhood cancer: results from the childhood cancer survivor study. Psychol Assess. 2006;18(1):22–32. 10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.22 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gianinazzi ME, Rueegg CS, Wengenroth L, Bergstraesser E, Rischewski J, Ammann RA, et al. Adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: are they vulnerable for psychological distress? Psychooncology. 2013;22(9):2051–8. 10.1002/pon.3249 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80(1):99–103. Epub 2003/02/14. 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Spinella JF, Healy J, Saillour V, Richer C, Cassart P, Ouimet M, et al. Whole-exome sequencing of a rare case of familial childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia reveals putative predisposing mutations in Fanconi anemia genes. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:539 Epub 2015/07/24. 10.1186/s12885-015-1549-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60. Epub 2009/05/20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Picard Tools—By Broad Institute: Code ZIP File; 2018. Available from: https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/.
  • 48.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–303. Epub 2010/07/21. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(16):e164 10.1093/nar/gkq603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(7):1073–81. Epub 2009/06/30. 10.1038/nprot.2009.86 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ng PC, Henikoff S. Predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2006;7:61–80. Epub 2006/07/11. 10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115630 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.The 1000 Genomes Browsers | 1000 Genomes 2018. Available from: http://www.internationalgenome.org/1000-genomes-browsers/.
  • 53.Exome Variant Server 2018. Available from: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/.
  • 54.Mikkelsen TS, Thorn CF, Yang JJ, Ulrich CM, French D, Zaza G, et al. PharmGKB summary: methotrexate pathway. Pharmacogenetics and genomics. 2011;21(10):679–86. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328343dd93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schlossmacher G, Stevens A, White A. Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated apoptosis: mechanisms of resistance in cancer cells. J Endocrinol. 2011;211(1):17–25. 10.1530/JOE-11-0135 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes 2018. Available from: https://www.genome.jp/kegg/. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 57.Whole genome association analysis toolset. Available from: http://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/plink/index.shtml.
  • 58.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75. Epub 2007/08/19. 10.1086/519795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Waber DP, Tarbell NJ, Kahn CM, Gelber RD, Sallan SE. The relationship of sex and treatment modality to neuropsychologic outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(5):810–7. 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.5.810 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125(1–2):279–84. Epub 2001/10/30. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. Quantitative trait Loci analysis using the false discovery rate. Genetics. 2005;171(2):783–90. Epub 2005/06/16. 10.1534/genetics.104.036699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lee S, Emond MJ, Bamshad MJ, Barnes KC, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA, et al. Optimal unified approach for rare-variant association testing with application to small-sample case-control whole-exome sequencing studies. American journal of human genetics. 2012;91(2):224–37. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.007 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wu MC, Kraft P, Epstein MP, Taylor DM, Chanock SJ, Hunter DJ, et al. Powerful SNP-set analysis for case-control genome-wide association studies. American journal of human genetics. 2010;86(6):929–42. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.CRAN—Package SKAT 2019. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SKAT/index.html.
  • 65.Dering C, Hemmelmann C, Pugh E, Ziegler A. Statistical analysis of rare sequence variants: an overview of collapsing methods. Genet Epidemiol. 2011;35 Suppl 1:S12–7. Epub 2011/12/14. 10.1002/gepi.20643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sung YJ, Korthauer KD, Swartz MD, Engelman CD. Methods for collapsing multiple rare variants in whole-genome sequence data. Genet Epidemiol. 2014;38 Suppl 1:S13–20. Epub 2014/08/13. 10.1002/gepi.21820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bellampalli R, Vohra M, Sharma K, Bhaskaranand N, Bhat KG, Prasad K, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia and genetic variations in BHMT gene: Case-control study and computational characterization. Cancer Biomark. 2017. 10.3233/CBM-160186 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rozycka A, Jagodzinski PP, Kozubski W, Lianeri M, Dorszewska J. Homocysteine Level and Mechanisms of Injury in Parkinson's Disease as Related to MTHFR, MTR, and MTHFD1 Genes Polymorphisms and L-Dopa Treatment. Curr Genomics. 2013;14(8):534–42. 10.2174/1389202914666131210210559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Robaey P, Krajinovic M, Marcoux S, Moghrabi A. Pharmacogenetics of the neurodevelopmental impact of anticancer chemotherapy. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(3):211–20. Epub 2008/10/17. 10.1002/ddrr.29 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cole PD, Finkelstein Y, Stevenson KE, Blonquist TM, Vijayanathan V, Silverman LB, et al. Polymorphisms in Genes Related to Oxidative Stress Are Associated With Inferior Cognitive Function After Therapy for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(19):2205–11. Epub 2015/05/20. 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.0273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Linnebank M, Malessa S, Moskau S, Semmler A, Pels H, Klockgether T, et al. Acute methotrexate-induced encephalopathy—causal relation to homozygous allelic state for MTR c.2756A>G (D919G)? J Chemother. 2007;19(4):455–7. Epub 2007/09/15. 10.1179/joc.2007.19.4.455 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Krull KR, Bhojwani D, Conklin HM, Pei D, Cheng C, Reddick WE, et al. Genetic mediators of neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(17):2182–8. Epub 2013/05/08. 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.7944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kamdar KY, Krull KR, El-Zein RA, Brouwers P, Potter BS, Harris LL, et al. Folate pathway polymorphisms predict deficits in attention and processing speed after childhood leukemia therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57(3):454–60. Epub 2011/05/28. 10.1002/pbc.23162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Nakao A, Miki T, Shoji H, Nishi M, Takeshima H, Miyakawa T, et al. Comprehensive behavioral analysis of voltage-gated calcium channel beta-anchoring and -regulatory protein knockout mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:141 Epub 2015/07/03. 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.McEnery MW, Vance CL, Begg CM, Lee WL, Choi Y, Dubel SJ. Differential expression and association of calcium channel subunits in development and disease. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1998;30(4):409–18. Epub 1998/10/03. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics C. Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9875):1371–9. Epub 2013/03/05. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62129-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Breitenkamp AF, Matthes J, Nass RD, Sinzig J, Lehmkuhl G, Nurnberg P, et al. Rare mutations of CACNB2 found in autism spectrum disease-affected families alter calcium channel function. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95579 10.1371/journal.pone.0095579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Soldatov NM. CACNB2: An Emerging Pharmacological Target for Hypertension, Heart Failure, Arrhythmia and Mental Disorders. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2015;8(1):32–42. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Klotz L, Schmidt S, Heun R, Klockgether T, Kolsch H. Association of the PPARgamma gene polymorphism Pro12Ala with delayed onset of multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2009;449(1):81–3. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.066 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Heberden C, Meffray E, Goustard-Langelier B, Maximin E, Lavialle M. Dexamethasone inhibits the maturation of newly formed neurons and glia supplemented with polyunsaturated fatty acids. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;138:395–402. Epub 2013/08/03. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.07.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Fu Y, Zhen J, Lu Z. Synergetic Neuroprotective Effect of Docosahexaenoic Acid and Aspirin in SH-Y5Y by Inhibiting miR-21 and Activating RXRalpha and PPARalpha. DNA Cell Biol. 2017;36(6):482–9. 10.1089/dna.2017.3643 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Steinbach D, Legrand O. ABC transporters and drug resistance in leukemia: was P-gp nothing but the first head of the Hydra? Leukemia. 2007;21:1172 10.1038/sj.leu.2404692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mehul B, Bernard D, Simonetti L, Bernard MA, Schmidt R. Identification and cloning of a new calmodulin-like protein from human epidermis. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(17):12841–7. 10.1074/jbc.275.17.12841 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Matsuoka M. Protective effects of Humanin and calmodulin-like skin protein in Alzheimer's disease and broad range of abnormalities. Mol Neurobiol. 2015;51(3):1232–9. 10.1007/s12035-014-8799-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hashimoto Y, Nawa M, Kurita M, Tokizawa M, Iwamatsu A, Matsuoka M. Secreted calmodulin-like skin protein inhibits neuronal death in cell-based Alzheimer's disease models via the heterotrimeric Humanin receptor. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e555 10.1038/cddis.2013.80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hasegawa S, Kumagai M, Hagihara M, Nishimaru H, Hirano K, Kaneko R, et al. Distinct and Cooperative Functions for the Protocadherin-alpha, -beta and -gamma Clusters in Neuronal Survival and Axon Targeting. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016;9:155 Epub 2017/01/10. 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pedrosa E, Stefanescu R, Margolis B, Petruolo O, Lo Y, Nolan K, et al. Analysis of protocadherin alpha gene enhancer polymorphism in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008;102(1–3):210–9. Epub 2008/05/30. 10.1016/j.schres.2008.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Naskar T, Faruq M, Banerjee P, Khan M, Midha R, Kumari R, et al. Ancestral Variations of the PCDHG Gene Cluster Predispose to Dyslexia in a Multiplex Family. EBioMedicine. 2018;28:168–79. Epub 2018/02/08. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kadan-Lottick NS, Zeltzer LK, Liu Q, Yasui Y, Ellenberg L, Gioia G, et al. Neurocognitive functioning in adult survivors of childhood non-central nervous system cancers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2010;102(12):881–93. Epub 2010/05/12. 10.1093/jnci/djq156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Buizer AI, de Sonneville LM, Veerman AJ. Effects of chemotherapy on neurocognitive function in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a critical review of the literature. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;52(4):447–54. 10.1002/pbc.21869 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Janzen LA, Spiegler BJ. Neurodevelopmental sequelae of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its treatment. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(3):185–95. 10.1002/ddrr.24 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Edelstein K, D'Agostino N, Bernstein LJ, Nathan PC, Greenberg ML, Hodgson DC, et al. Long-term neurocognitive outcomes in young adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011;33(6):450–8. 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31820d86f2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Waber DP, Queally JT, Catania L, Robaey P, Romero I, Adams H, et al. Neuropsychological outcomes of standard risk and high risk patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia on Dana-Farber ALL consortium protocol 95–01 at 5 years post-diagnosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58(5):758–65. 10.1002/pbc.23234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.How J, Blattner M, Fowler S, Wang-Gillam A, Schindler SE. Chemotherapy-associated Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Neurologist. 2016;21(6):112–7. Epub 2016/11/02. 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000105 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Stiefel FC, Breitbart WS, Holland JC. Corticosteroids in cancer: neuropsychiatric complications. Cancer Invest. 1989;7(5):479–91. Epub 1989/01/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Brown RT, Madan-Swain A, Walco GA, Cherrick I, Ievers CE, Conte PM, et al. Cognitive and academic late effects among children previously treated for acute lymphocytic leukemia receiving chemotherapy as CNS prophylaxis. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998;23(5):333–40. 10.1093/jpepsy/23.5.333 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Jain N, Brouwers P, Okcu MF, Cirino PT, Krull KR. Sex-specific attention problems in long-term survivors of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2009;115(18):4238–45. 10.1002/cncr.24464 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Reddick WE, Taghipour DJ, Glass JO, Ashford J, Xiong X, Wu S, et al. Prognostic factors that increase the risk for reduced white matter volumes and deficits in attention and learning for survivors of childhood cancers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(6):1074–9. 10.1002/pbc.24947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.WHO | Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders. World Health Organization, 2017. 2017-02-23 13:46:21. Report No. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Furlong W, Rae C, Feeny D, Gelber RD, Laverdiere C, Michon B, et al. Health-related quality of life among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;59(4):717–24. 10.1002/pbc.24096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Recklitis CJ, Blackmon JE, Chang G. Validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) for identifying depression and anxiety in young adult cancer survivors: Comparison with a Structured Clinical Diagnostic Interview. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(10):1189–200. Epub 2017/01/13. 10.1037/pas0000427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Teng T, Gaillard A, Muzerelle A, Gaspar P. EphrinA5 Signaling Is Required for the Distinctive Targeting of Raphe Serotonin Neurons in the Forebrain. eNeuro. 2017;4(1). 10.1523/ENEURO.0327-16.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Murai KK, Pasquale EB. Can Eph receptors stimulate the mind? Neuron. 2002;33(2):159–62. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.De Bellis MD, Keshavan MS, Beers SR, Hall J, Frustaci K, Masalehdan A, et al. Sex differences in brain maturation during childhood and adolescence. Cereb Cortex. 2001;11(6):552–7. 10.1093/cercor/11.6.552 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Schmithorst VJ, Holland SK, Dardzinski BJ. Developmental differences in white matter architecture between boys and girls. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008;29(6):696–710. Epub 2007/06/29. 10.1002/hbm.20431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ramsey LB, Panetta JC, Smith C, Yang W, Fan Y, Winick NJ, et al. Genome-wide study of methotrexate clearance replicates SLCO1B1. Blood. 2013;121(6):898–904. 10.1182/blood-2012-08-452839 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Trevino LR, Shimasaki N, Yang W, Panetta JC, Cheng C, Pei D, et al. Germline genetic variation in an organic anion transporter polypeptide associated with methotrexate pharmacokinetics and clinical effects. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(35):5972–8. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Abe T, Kakyo M, Tokui T, Nakagomi R, Nishio T, Nakai D, et al. Identification of a novel gene family encoding human liver-specific organic anion transporter LST-1. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(24):17159–63. 10.1074/jbc.274.24.17159 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Liu SG, Gao C, Zhang RD, Zhao XX, Cui L, Li WJ, et al. Polymorphisms in methotrexate transporters and their relationship to plasma methotrexate levels, toxicity of high-dose methotrexate, and outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncotarget. 2017;8(23):37761–72. Epub 2017/05/20. 10.18632/oncotarget.17781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Yang L, Wu H, Gelder TV, Matic M, Ruan JS, Han Y, et al. SLCO1B1 rs4149056 genetic polymorphism predicting methotrexate toxicity in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Pharmacogenomics. 2017;18(17):1557–62. Epub 2017/11/03. 10.2217/pgs-2017-0110 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Radtke S, Zolk O, Renner B, Paulides M, Zimmermann M, Moricke A, et al. Germline genetic variations in methotrexate candidate genes are associated with pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(26):5145–53. Epub 2013/05/09. 10.1182/blood-2013-01-480335 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Coon H, Darlington T, Pimentel R, Smith KR, Huff CD, Hu H, et al. Genetic risk factors in two Utah pedigrees at high risk for suicide. Transl Psychiatry. 2013;3:e325 Epub 2013/11/21. 10.1038/tp.2013.100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kock K, Koenen A, Giese B, Fraunholz M, May K, Siegmund W, et al. Rapid modulation of the organic anion transporting polypeptide 2B1 (OATP2B1, SLCO2B1) function by protein kinase C-mediated internalization. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(15):11336–47. Epub 2010/02/18. 10.1074/jbc.M109.056457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Yang M, Xie W, Mostaghel E, Nakabayashi M, Werner L, Sun T, et al. SLCO2B1 and SLCO1B3 may determine time to progression for patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(18):2565–73. Epub 2011/05/25. 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Pejovic-Milovancevic MM, Mandic-Maravic VD, Coric VM, Mitkovic-Voncina MM, Kostic MV, Savic-Radojevic AR, et al. Glutathione S-Transferase Deletion Polymorphisms in Early-Onset Psychotic and Bipolar Disorders: A Case-Control Study. Lab Med. 2016;47(3):195–204. 10.1093/labmed/lmw017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Krajinovic M, Labuda D, Sinnett D. Glutathione S-transferase P1 genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12(8):655–8. Epub 2002/11/20. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Krull KR, Zhang N, Santucci A, Srivastava DK, Krasin MJ, Kun LE, et al. Long-term decline in intelligence among adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with cranial radiation. Blood. 2013;122(4):550–3. Epub 2013/06/08. 10.1182/blood-2013-03-487744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Edelmann MN, Ogg RJ, Scoggins MA, Brinkman TM, Sabin ND, Pui CH, et al. Dexamethasone exposure and memory function in adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the SJLIFE cohort. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(11):1778–84. Epub 2013/06/19. 10.1002/pbc.24644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Armstrong GT, Reddick WE, Petersen RC, Santucci A, Zhang N, Srivastava D, et al. Evaluation of memory impairment in aging adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with cranial radiotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(12):899–907. Epub 2013/04/16. 10.1093/jnci/djt089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hudson MM, Ness KK, Nolan VG, Armstrong GT, Green DM, Morris EB, et al. Prospective medical assessment of adults surviving childhood cancer: study design, cohort characteristics, and feasibility of the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(5):825–36. Epub 2011/03/04. 10.1002/pbc.22875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Principal component analysis (PCA).

PCA analysis comparing sequencing data of 400 leukemia patients (including PETALE cohort) from Sainte-Justine University Health Center (SJUHC) to the HapMap genotype reference data (release 23) for Europeans (EUR), East Asians (EAS) and Africans (AFR).

PC1, Principal Component 1; PC2, Principal Component 2.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Genotyping: Identity of polymorphisms, details of PCR and ASO hybridization.

R, reverse, F, forward. The base substitution that distinguishes the two variants of each polymorphism is given in bold for ASO probes. dbSNP number is provided. Ancestral allele is given in bold and minor allele is underlined. The polymorphisms are presented as a change from ancestral to derived allele, unless ancestral allele is not known, when the change is given from major to minor allele. SNPs in coding region leading or not to amino-acid substitutions are indicated.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Significant results of association study of common variants from the candidate genes of relevance for nervous system function, PETALE cohort, WES data (n = 191).

aAssociation test based on comparing allele frequencies between cases and controls. All associations have FDR-BH (Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate) lower than 5%. All also have p value lower than 0.001, which is Bonferroni cut-off value for the number of variants tested in nervous system function pathway.

bStratified analyses according to sex and treatment intensity (standard vs high risk); chemotherapy only vs chemotherapy and cranial radiation therapy (CRT).

Ref: reference allele; Var: variant allele; MAF: minor allele frequency, PCDHB10, protocadherin beta 10, CALML5: Calmodulin Like 5, CACNB2: Calcium Voltage-Gated Channel Auxiliary Subunit Beta2, EPHA5: EPH Receptor A5, Brain-Specific Kinase.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Results of association study of common variants from methotrexate and corticosteroids pathways, PETALE cohort, WES data (n = 191).

aAssociation test based on comparing allele frequencies between cases and controls. All associations have FDR-BH (Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate) lower than 5%.

bStratified analyses according to sex and treatment intensity (standard vs high risk); chemotherapy only vs chemotherapy and cranial radiation therapy (CRT).

c SNPs or associations that did not qualify for genotyping with p value higher than 0.0019 (Bonferroni cut-off value for the number of genes tested in MTX/CS pathway).

Ref: reference allele; Var: variant allele; MAF: minor allele frequency; MTR: 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate-Homocysteine Methyltransferase, PPARA: Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Alpha, ABCC3: ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 3, SHMT1: Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase 1, ADORA3: Adenosine Receptor A3, SLCO1B1: Solute Carrier Organic Anion Transporter.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. The combined cohort represents the pooled samples from the discovery PETALE cohort and replication SJLIFE cohort (N = 781). Combined cohort analysis was performed for the variants in CACNB2 and MTR genes.

*Participants with and without indicated complications are defined as cases and controls, respectively.

**P values are calculated by Chi-square. The most representative genetic model used is indicated (d: Dominant, r: Recessive).

***Chemotherapy without cranial radiation therapy.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

The raw data used in this manuscript are available upon request because they contain sensitive patient information. The restrictions upon the data are imposed by the President of the ethics committee at CHU Sainte Justine. Interested researchers can contact the following authors and data access committee members: Dr. M. Krajinovic, Director of Pharmacogenomics lab at maja.krajinovic@umontreal.ca; Dr. S. Lippe at sarah.lippe@umontreal.ca; and Dr. S. Sultan serge.sultan@umontreal.ca. They may also contact the President of the ethics committee at CHU Sainte Justine, G. Cardinal by email genevieve.cardinal.hsj@ssss.gouv.qc.ca or mail at Sainte-Justine University Health Center (SJUHC) 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal (Quebec), Canada, H3T 1C5. A detailed list of studied polymorphisms is fully available to the public at Figshare (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8051573) as well as the summary statistics for all polymorphisms analyzed from the sequencing data beyond those presented in the manuscript and supplemental materials (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8051825).


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES