Introduction
Serum sickness–like reaction (SSLR) is an uncommon adverse cutaneous drug eruption that mimics serum sickness (SS). Both conditions feature urticarial lesions, joint symptoms, and lymphadenopathy, but only SS manifests hypocomplementemia and renal involvement and is an immune complex hypersensitivity that is usually associated with parenteral nonhuman protein drugs. In contrast, SSLR is associated with numerous oral drugs like antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Here we report on a 52-year-old man with SSLR attributed to the selective β-3 adrenoceptor agonist, mirabegron, which is used to treat overactive bladder (OAB).
Case presentation
A 52-year-old Chinese man presented with a 4-day history of generalized, itchy, fixed urticarial plaques as well as headache, malaise, joint pain and swelling. The urticarial lesions mostly lasted longer than 24 hours. His medical history included depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, vascular malformation, and severe psoriasis. His usual chronic medication included lithium, fluoxetine, risperidone, levomilnacipran, lorazepam, and gabapentin. One month before the illness, he started ustekinumab, 45 mg subcutaneously, for plaque psoriasis and received 2 doses, 4 weeks apart. Seven weeks before the presenting illness he had started mirabegron, 50 mg/d orally for OAB. He was allergic to sulphonamides.
On examination, there were widespread, fixed, annular urticoid plaques (Fig 1, A), with symmetric arthritis of the wrists, hands, ankles, and feet (Fig 1, B) and cervical lymphadenopathy. There were admixed psoriatic plaques. Complete blood count found a neutrophil count of 7.2 × 109/L, which is at the upper range of normal (2.0-7.5 × 109/L), an elevated C-reactive protein (161 mg/L; normal, ≤10 mg/L), but normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate, complement 3 and 4, creatinine, and urinalysis.
Fig 1.
A, Diffuse erythematous pink confluent urticarial plaques on the upper back. B, Warm, swollen, and tender joints of the wrists and hands.
Skin biopsy found a normal epidermis with a superficial perivascular and interstitial infiltrate dominated by neutrophils with fewer lymphocytes and eosinophils (Fig 2, A). There was a trace of leukocytoclasis (nuclear dust) and some extravasated red blood cells around dermal capillaries (Fig 2, B).
Fig 2.
A, Normal epidermis with a superficial perivascular and interstitial infiltrate of primarily neutrophils, with few lymphocytes and eosinophils. B, Trace of leukocytoclasis (nuclear dust) and some extravasated red blood cells around dermal capillaries. (A and B, Hematoxylin-eosin stain.)
His reaction was assessed as a probable serum sickness–like reaction, either to ustekinumab or to mirabegron, and the mirabegron was discontinued. He was treated with a 1-month tapering course of prednisone and had a quick recovery. Three months later, when due to receive his next dose of ustekinumab, it was noted that the psoriasis was much improved, and he agreed to a challenge of ustekinumab. Fortunately, there was no recurrence of SSLR upon rechallenge, which was further evidence that the culprit was likely to be mirabegron. The patient remains stable 10 months later and has started fesoterodine for OAB.
Discussion
Serum sickness is an immune complex mediated type III hypersensitivity reaction to exogenous, nonhuman proteins. It typically occurs 1 to 2 weeks after parenteral exposure to the offending agent. SS is characterized by fever, lymphadenopathy, urticarial or morbilliform rash, and arthralgia/arthritis. Laboratory investigation finds associated hypocomplementemia (C3 and C4) and proteinuria. Skin biopsy often finds neutrophil predominant inflammation or leukocytoclastic vasculitis.
In contrast, serum sickness–like reaction is probably a nonimmune complex-mediated reaction to drugs and does not manifest hypocomplementemia or renal involvement.1 The pathogenesis of SSLR is not well understood. It usually occurs 1 to 3 weeks after exposure to the offending drug and more commonly occurs in children.2 The histopathology of SSLR is not well reported but usually features similar changes to urticaria. Nguyen and Miller2 reported 2 cases of SSLR secondary to cefazolin and bupropion that presented with interstitial neutrophil predominance, similar to our case.
Drugs associated with SSLR include antibiotics (penicillin, sulphonamides, minocycline, and cephalosporins), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antidepressants (bupropion), anticonvulsants (phenytoin), and antihypertensives (propranolol).1 Mirabegron, a relatively novel β3-adrenergic receptor agonist, has not been reported to be associated with SSLR. The most commonly reported side effects of mirabegron are constipation, dysuria, and increased residual urine volume.3 A case of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–positive vasculitis was reported, but this was not felt to be related.3 The US Food and Drug Administration lists mirabegron as a potential cause of the following skin conditions: pruritus, urticaria, angioedema, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and purpura. Arthralgia is also mentioned.4, 5
This case shows the similarity and overlap between urticaria, urticarial vasculitis, SS, and SSLR and suggests that these conditions might represent a spectrum of the same hypersensitivity response. Mirabegron should be included in the possible causes of SSLR.
Footnotes
Funding sources: None.
Conflicts of interest: None disclosed.
References
- 1.Bolognia J.L., Schaffer J.V., Cerroni L. 4th ed. Elsevier; Edinburgh: 2017. Dermatology: 2-Volume Set. [Google Scholar]; Bolognia JL, Schaffer JV, Cerroni L. Dermatology: 2-Volume Set. 4th edition. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2017.
- 2.Nguyen C.V., Miller D.D. Serum sickness-like drug reaction: two cases with a neutrophilic urticarial pattern. J Cutan Pathol. 2017;44(2):177–182. doi: 10.1111/cup.12863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Nguyen CV, Miller DD. Serum sickness-like drug reaction: two cases with a neutrophilic urticarial pattern. J Cutan Pathol. 2017;44(2):177-182. doi:10.1111/cup.12863 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Kato D., Tabuchi H., Uno S. Safety, efficacy, and persistence of long-term mirabegron treatment for overactive bladder in the daily clinical setting: interim (1-year) report from a Japanese post-marketing surveillance study. LUTS Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019;11(1):14–23. doi: 10.1111/luts.12188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Kato D, Tabuchi H, Uno S. Safety, efficacy, and persistence of long-term mirabegron treatment for overactive bladder in the daily clinical setting: interim (1-year) report from a Japanese post-marketing surveillance study. LUTS Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 0(0). doi:10.1111/luts.12188 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Sharaf A., Hashim H. Profile of mirabegron in the treatment of overactive bladder: place in therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:463–467. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S101630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Sharaf A, Hashim H. Profile of mirabegron in the treatment of overactive bladder: place in therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:463-467. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S101630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Food and Drug Administration Drug database: MYRBETRIQ® (mirabegron) https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/202611s000lbl.pdf; Food and Drug Administration. Drug database: MYRBETRIQ® (mirabegron). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/202611s000lbl.pdf. Accessed July 3, 2018.