Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2019 Apr 25;123(22):4705–4717. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b01236

Polarized Two-Photon Absorption and Heterogeneous Fluorescence Dynamics in NAD(P)H

Thomas S Blacker †,‡,§, Nick Nicolaou , Michael R Duchen §, Angus J Bain †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC6558641  PMID: 31021092

Abstract

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_0001.jpg

Two-photon absorption (2PA) finds widespread application in biological systems, which frequently exhibit heterogeneous fluorescence decay dynamics corresponding to multiple species or environments. By combining polarized 2PA with time-resolved fluorescence intensity and anisotropy decay measurements, we show how the two-photon transition tensors for the components of a heterogeneous population can be separately determined, allowing structural differences between the two fluorescent states of the redox cofactor NAD(P)H to be identified. The results support the view that the two states correspond to alternate configurations of the nicotinamide ring, rather than folded and extended conformations of the entire molecule.

Introduction

NAD and NADP are the principle biological cofactors involved in cellular redox metabolism.1 The two molecules differ only by the presence of a phosphate group at the redox-inactive adenine end of NADP which is absent in NAD, as shown in Figure 1. This allows enzyme binding sites to be specific to either cofactor, enabling them to regulate contrasting biochemical pathways. The hydride-carrying nicotinamide ring is identical in the two molecules, and it is responsible for the spectrally identical intrinsic fluorescence of their reduced forms, NADH and NADPH.2 As alterations in the redox balance of the NAD and NADP pools are linked to a range of pathological conditions, NAD(P)H autofluorescence is often employed to investigate the role of metabolism in disease.3 Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) is frequently used for this purpose; inside cells, the rate of decay of NAD(P)H fluorescence is dependent upon the enzymes to which the molecules are bound, allowing changes in the metabolic pathways activated in the diseased state to be detected in a label-free manner.38 Maximizing the information content of these measurements requires an increased understanding of how the photophysical quantities reported reflect the biochemical status of the target molecules.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Fluorescence in NADH and NADPH is localized to the nicotinamide moiety (a), where the amide group can adopt a cis (shown) or trans form by rotating 180° around the bond linking it to the pyridine ring. NADPH differs in structure from NADH by the presence of a phosphate group (b) at the adenine (c) end of the molecule.

Even outside the highly crowded and nonuniform environment of the cell,9 pure aqueous solutions of NADH or NADPH exhibit fluorescence decay dynamics indicative of an intrinsically heterogeneous population.1012 Two species are present in solutions of either molecule, a majority component (∼90%) with a lifetime of approximately 0.4 ns and a minority component (∼10%) of 0.8 ns.10 However, the molecular origin of these species remains elusive. NAD(P)H is known to exist in two distinct configurations in solution, either folded with stacked adenine and nicotinamide rings or open and extended,13 and parallels have perhaps naively been drawn between these two configurations and the two-component fluorescence decay of the molecule. For example, it has been suggested that the short lifetime state results from the folded configuration inducing dynamic quenching of the excited nicotinamide by the adenine moiety.14,15 In contrast, the apparent nonexistence of the longer lifetime state in NAD(P)H analogues where the adenine moiety is absent led to suggestions that the nicotinamide and adenine rings form an exciplex with an enhanced quantum yield when stacked.11,16 Recent ultrafast transient absorption studies appear to rule this out.17 Additionally, inconsistencies between the decay amplitudes of the two components and the fraction of folded species measured by energy transfer,13 alongside demonstrations of heterogeneous decay kinetics in nicotinamide mononucleotide,12,18,19 suggest that the two fluorescence decay times arise from photophysical processes independent of the adenine moiety.

In previous work, we demonstrated that the high rate of nonradiative excited state decay in NAD(P)H is due to small scale motion of the nicotinamide ring.10 Power law models implied that the specific molecular motion associated with the conformational relaxation was identical in the two species, while an activated barrier crossing analysis suggested that the contrasting lifetimes of the two species arise from differences in the shape of the intramolecular potential energy surface experienced by the molecule while undergoing the motion. In the present study, we gain further insight into the photophysical origins of the two excited state populations in NAD(P)H through a novel approach to determine the individual two-photon absorption (2PA) properties of a multiple component system.

Polarization Dependence of Two-Photon Absorption

A fundamental property of single-photon absorption (1PA) in an isotropic medium is that the transition probability is independent of the polarization of the incident light.20 However, for 2PA, the transition does not involve a simple dipolar rearrangement of electronic charge density but depends on a sum of products of all the allowed single-photon electric dipole transition moments between the ground, virtual, and final states. In essence, the first photon can be thought of as selecting a nonstationary virtual state that can be caused to undergo transitions to the final state by a second photon with only certain polarizations.21,22 The polarization dependence of 2PA is most commonly expressed through the polarization ratio Ω, defined as the ratio of the 2PA cross sections for circularly and linearly polarized excitation23

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m001.jpg 1

The orientation-dependent transition probability for the absorption of two identical photons with polarization vectors ê can be expressed as24,25

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m002.jpg 2

where Inline graphic is the second rank tensor describing the angular properties of the two-photon transition. Transforming from the laboratory to molecular frame of reference and performing the necessary orientational averaging is most conveniently achieved using a spherical tensor formalism.22,2427 With this approach and assuming a planar transition, valid for NAD(P)H,2 Ω can be written as

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m004.jpg 3

Normalizing with respect to SXX yields22,2427

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m005.jpg 4

where S = SYY/SXXand D = SXY/SXX. Values of Ω range from 1/4 to 3/2 depending on the symmetry of the participating electronic and vibrational states23,2638 and local solvation effects.39 The fluorescence anisotropies immediately after excitation by linearly and circularly polarized 2PA, Rlin(0) and Rcirc(0) respectively, are also determined by the components of Inline graphic according to25

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m007.jpg 5
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m008.jpg 6

where θM is the angle made by the emission transition dipole with respect to the x-axis of the molecular frame. Adopting a coordinate system in which this is defined by the direction of the 1PA transition dipole moment, θM can be determined from the initial anisotropy following 1PA40

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m009.jpg 7

Thus, given experimental measurements of Rlin(0), Rcirc(0), R1P(0), and Ω, the corresponding two-photon tensor components S and D can be calculated by solving eqs 47. This approach has previously been applied to perylene26,27,36 and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP).25 As Ω is independent of emission dipole moment orientation, it has also been measured by time averaged (steady state) fluorescence intensities following linearly and circularly polarized 2PA. However, as will be seen, this approach is no longer possible in systems with strongly heterogeneous fluorescence dynamics such as NAD(P)H, and it is necessary to combine both time-resolved and steady state fluorescence measurements to determine the individual Ω values and corresponding transition tensor structures of each species.

Polarized Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence in Heterogeneous Systems

The simplest heterogeneous system corresponds to a mixed population containing two species i = 1, 2 with relative (ground state) abundances γi (with γ1 + γ2 = 1), radiative rates kirad and fluorescence lifetimes τi. The fluorescence decays following linearly and circularly polarized two-photon excitation are given by

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m010.jpg 8
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m011.jpg 9

where σicirc and σi are the cross sections for circularly and linearly polarized 2PA. The parameters Acirc and Alin account for differences in the amount of fluorescence collected in each decay measurement arising, for example, from variations in laser power and collection times. In steady state measurements, Acirc and Alin can be made equal by measuring time-averaged fluorescence count rates under constant illumination intensity. Under these conditions, using eqs 8 and 9 to equate the ratio of absorption strengths to the ratio of fluorescence intensities29 gives

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m012.jpg 10

where the bar signifies that the single Ω̅ measurement reflects an underlying mixed population and φi are the quantum yields of each species. Rearranging for the individual polarization ratios, we find

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m013.jpg 11
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m014.jpg 12

Therefore, in addition to Ω̅, determining Ω1 and Ω2 would require knowledge of the relative ground state abundances of each species, their polarization dependent 2PA cross sections and their quantum yields. However, we now show that this can also be achieved by combining ensemble polarized 2PA measurements with the parameters describing the fluorescence decays of a heterogeneous population for each excitation condition. These will have the form of eqs 8 and 9 for a two-component system such as NAD(P)H, which can be written in terms of the peak fluorescence intensities Icirc(0) and Ilin(0) by

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m015.jpg 13
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m016.jpg 14

where α1 + α2 = 1. Equating the pre-exponential factors with eqs 8 and 9 gives

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m017.jpg 15
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m018.jpg 16
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m019.jpg 17
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m020.jpg 18

Least squares fits to the intensity decay data yield values for the lifetimes τi and amplitudes αi. The constituent 2PA polarization ratios are then given by

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m021.jpg 19
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m022.jpg 20

Integrating eqs 8, 9, 13, and 14 to obtain the total fluorescence emission yields

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m023.jpg 21
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m024.jpg 22

Dividing eq 21 by eq 22 then gives

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m025.jpg 23

Substituting eq 10 and rearranging, we obtain

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m026.jpg 24

Substituting for Alin/Acirc in eqs 19 and 20 then gives

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m027.jpg 25
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m028.jpg 26

These expressions thus allow the Ω values of the subpopulations to be determined by combining the fluorescence decay parameters with the conventional steady state Ω̅ measurement. Our use of this approach to determine the underlying transition tensor structures of the 2PA processes that give rise to the biexponential fluorescence decay of NAD(P)H constitutes the first application of this method.

Experimental Methods

NAD(P)H Solutions

NADH (N8129, Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, U.K.) and NADPH (N7505, Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, U.K.) were made up fresh on the day of experiment as 1 mM solutions in Milli-Q water containing 10 mM HEPES (H3375, Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, U.K.) adjusted to pH 7.2.

Laser Sources

For experiments with incident wavelengths between 625 and 720 nm, excitation was provided by the output of an optical parametric amplifier (OPA 9400, Coherent, Cambridgeshire, U.K.) pumped by a regeneratively amplified Ti:sapphire laser (Mira 900F and RegA 9000, Coherent, Cambridgeshire, U.K.) operating at 800 nm with a repetition rate of 250 kHz. For wavelengths between 700 and 780 nm, the 76 MHz output of a Ti:sapphire laser (Mira 900F, Coherent, Cambridgeshire, U.K.) was pulse picked to a repetition rate of 3.8 MHz (PulseSelect, APE, Berlin, Germany) for compatibility with the detection electronics. The 360 nm excitation was obtained by frequency doubling the pulse-picked Ti:sapphire output when tuned to 720 nm using a β-barium borate (BBO) crystal.

Fluorescence Measurements

Both time-dependent and time-averaged polarized fluorescence measurements were made using a modular time correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) system (Ortec, Berkshire, U.K.) described previously.10 The incident illumination was passed through a Glan-Laser polarizer (Melles-Griot, New York) to ensure vertical polarization and a 25 mm focal length achromatic doublet lens (Melles-Griot, New York) was used to focus the beam onto the sample, held in a 3 mm path length, 50 μL quartz cuvette (Hellma, Essex, U.K.). Fluorescence was collected in a 90° excitation-detection geometry using a 25 cm focal length lens and focused into a multichannel plate photomultiplier tube (MCP-PMT, R3809U, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hertfordshire, U.K.) with a ∼100 ps instrument response, passing through a 600 nm short pass filter, to eliminate laser breakthrough, and an emission polarizer. This was set to the appropriate magic angle for absolute fluorescence intensity measurements, recorded from the count rate display of the TCSPC system. For time-resolved fluorescence measurements, a stepper motor rotated the emission polarizer every 10 s to alternately transmit light polarized parallel or perpendicular to the symmetry axis of the excitation polarization (vertical for linear, horizontal for circular). The corresponding decays I||(t) and I(t), spread across 512 channels covering 27 ns, were stored separately in computer memory. Emission events were registered for approximately 60 min for each set of measurements, resulting in a total number of photons collected on the order of 105–106, well below the 1 in 100 threshold for avoiding pulse pile-up effects.41

Two-Photon Action Cross Section Measurements

Following the approach of Xu and Webb,42 two-photon excitation of a sample by a pulsed laser source of wavelength λ results in a time-averaged total fluorescence intensity of

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m029.jpg 27

where the fluorophore is present at a concentration C in a medium of refractive index n. ⟨P(t)⟩ is the time-averaged on-sample power of the illumination pulses with repetition rate f and gp is a dimensionless quantity dependent on the temporal profile of the laser pulses of duration (fwhm) w. ε quantifies the fraction of the total fluorescence emitted by the fluorophore that is collected, taking into account emission filtering and the spectral efficiency of the detector. The product of the two-photon cross section σ2P and the quantum yield φ is the effective cross section for two-photon excited fluorescence, often referred to as the two-photon action cross section. This is frequently quoted in the units of Goeppert-Mayer (GM) where 1 GM is 10–50 cm4 s photon–1. The two-photon action cross sections of NADH and NADPH solutions could therefore be obtained by comparing the fluorescence intensity emitted at each excitation wavelength with that of reference standards with well characterized 2PA spectra:42p-bis(O-methylstyryl)benzene (bis-MSB, 15090, Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, U.K.) in cyclohexane (227048, Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, U.K.) covering 625 to 740 nm, and rhodamine B (LC6100, Lamdba Physik, Goettingen, Germany) in methanol (154903, Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, U.K.) covering 700 to 780 nm. The bis-MSB reference spectrum was obtained by combining the relative spectrum provided by Kennedy et al.43 with the absolute cross section of 69 GM at 585 nm reported by Fisher et al.44 For rhodamine B, two-photon action cross sections were obtained online from the Zipfel lab at Cornell University.45 By rearranging eq 27, assuming all incident laser properties remained constant between the reference and NAD(P)H measurements, the two-photon action cross sections could be calculated from

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m030.jpg 28

Solvent refractive indices n were obtained from the literature.46,47 Concentrations C were determined using published extinction coefficients4850 and a USB spectrometer (USB4000, OceanOptics, Florida, USA) coupled to a xenon white light source. Rhodamine B and bis-MSB solutions were on the order of 10–5 M and 10–4 M respectively. The parameter ε was calculated as

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m031.jpg 29

where E(λ) is the emission spectrum of the fluorophore obtained from the literature.5153F(λ) is the transmission ratio through the 600 nm short-pass emission filter measured using the absorption spectrometer described above. G(λ) is the detection efficiency of the MCP-PMT at emission wavelength λ, provided by the manufacturer. Values of εNAD(P)H = 0.0751(±0.0003), εbis-MSB = 0.0511(±0.0003), and εRhB = 0.0249(±0.0001) were determined.

Action cross sections were obtained between 625 and 780 nm at 5 nm intervals. Values at wavelengths with multiple measurements (due to both reference samples being applicable or in the overlap between laser sources) are reported as uncertainty-weighted averages.

Polarized Two-Photon Excitation

The excitation polarization was varied between linear and circular by introducing a zero-order tunable quarter wave plate (Alphalas, Goettingen, Germany) prior to the focusing lens. Circular polarization was confirmed by observing that the power transmitted through a linear analyzing polarizer remained constant throughout its 360° rotation. Measurements of the fluorescence intensity were taken for each polarization in turn, with the emission polarizer set to the corresponding magic angle (54.7° and 35.3° from the vertical for linear and circular polarization respectively). Five ⟨Icirc(t)⟩/⟨Ilin(t)⟩ pairs were taken at each wavelength, with Ω̅ reported as the mean of these five ratios.

Fluorescence Intensity Decays

Fluorescence decay curves were constructed from the polarized decays I||(t) and I(t) using

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m032.jpg 30

Fluorescence lifetimes were extracted from the I(t) data sets using weighted least-squares tail fitting in OriginPro 2015 (OriginLab, Massachusetts, USA). Goodness-of-fit was determined using the reduced χ2 parameter

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m033.jpg 31

where n is the total number of time bins, l is the number of freely varying parameters in the model and Imeasured(tk) and Imodel(tk) are the values of the fluorescence decay data set and model at the time after excitation corresponding to bin k. As I||(t) and I(t) constitute separate Poisson processes with standard deviations Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively, the fit weighting function can be obtained by propagation of uncertainty through eq 30, giving

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m036.jpg 32

For each time-resolved intensity measurement, a monoexponential fluorescence decay was a poor fit for the data, resulting in χR2 values of 33(±9). Addition of a second component improved this to a satisfactory 1.55(±0.07), with a triexponential model improving this value no further. All intensity decays were thus well described by biexponential functions as in eqs 8, 9, 13, and 14. The fraction of the total fluorescence emitted by each species i is then given by

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m037.jpg 33

Time-Resolved Fluorescence Anisotropy

Anisotropy decays R(t) were constructed from I||(t) and I(t) according to

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m038.jpg 34

Anisotropy decay fitting was carried out in OriginPro 2015 using the corresponding weighting function10

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m039.jpg 35

In a two-species system such as NAD(P)H, the observed fluorescence anisotropy is given by the time-dependent weighted average of the component anisotropies, known as the associated anisotropy54

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m040.jpg 36

where R1(0) and R2(0) are the initial anisotropies of the two subpopulations and τ1rot and τ2 are their rotational correlation times.10 However, in this work, the time-resolved fluorescence anisotropies of NADH and NADPH arising from both linear and circularly polarized 2PA were suitably fit by a monoexponential decay

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m041.jpg 37

with average χR2 values of 1.46(±0.07). χR2 improved no further by increasing the complexity of the fitting function, indicating equal initial anisotropies and rotational correlation times in the two subpopulations, to within experimental uncertainties.

Transition Tensor Structure

Equations 47 were solved by using a Monte Carlo method in MATLAB (MathWorks, Massachusetts, USA). The measured Rlin(0), Rcirc(0), R1P(0) and Ωi were input alongside their uncertainties, defining the mean values and standard deviations of normal distributions of each parameter. Parameter values were picked at random from these four distributions using the normrnd() function and the equations were solved for this set of parameters using fsolve(). This was repeated 10,000 times, with the means and standard deviations of the S and D distributions obtained taken as the solution and its associated uncertainty. 2D polar plots of the tensor structures were constructed by expressing Inline graphic in 2D polar coordinates

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m043.jpg 38

Error bounds were added to the polar plots by numerical propagation of error through eq 38 in MATLAB.

Results

Two-Photon Absorption Spectra

Wavelengths ranging from 700 to 780 nm have been used to interrogate NAD(P)H in living tissues,15,55 but its 2PA spectrum has never been fully determined below the Ti:sapphire tuning limit.18,56,57 Using an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) to bypass this threshold, we measured the two-photon action cross section spectra of NADH and NADPH to be identical, peaking at 690 nm with a value of 0.15(±0.01) GM (see Figure 2). Without explicit knowledge of the relative ground state abundances γi, it is not possible to determine the individual two-photon cross sections of the subpopulations of NADH and NADPH. The values of the action cross sections reported here therefore represent an ensemble average. While the peak transition energy in both molecules was similar to that of 1PA, maximized at 340 nm,58 the two-photon resonance was narrower (fwhm 0.45 vs 0.72 eV), as previously predicted for molecules in the Cs point group59 to which nicotinamide belongs.60 The parameter Ω̅ remained constant across the range of excitation wavelengths measured and was identical in NADH and NADPH, with a mean value of 0.787(±0.002). This is consistent with recent Ω measurements on NADH which assumed a homogeneous population61 and emphasizes the lack of influence over the excited state photophysics of the nicotinamide chromophore by the distant phosphate group that differentiates between the two cofactors.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Two-photon action cross section spectra and absorption polarization ratios of (a) NADH and (b) NADPH in aqueous HEPES buffer. No differences in the 2PA absorption characteristics of NADH and NADPH were evident, including in their relative susceptibility to circularly and linearly polarized excitation which remained invariant to excitation wavelength across the two-photon resonance, averaging 0.776(±0.002). The two-photon action cross sections peak at 690 nm at a value of 0.15 GM. This occurs at a similar energy to the 1PA spectrum50,58 (c and d).

In both NADH and NADPH, single- and two-photon excitation resulted in similar lifetimes for the two fluorescence decay components, in accordance with Kasha’s rule,62 with average values of 0.362(±0.001) and 0.750(±0.006) ns (see Figure 3 and Table 1). Importantly, while linearly polarized excitation with both single- and two-photon absorption caused 84(±2)% of the short lifetime species to be excited, circularly polarized 2PA resulted in a significantly smaller proportion of the short lifetime state, at 78(±1)%. The individual polarization ratios Ωi were calculated using eqs 25 and 26, giving values of Ω1 and Ω2 that lie below and above Ω̅ respectively. Averaging across the absorption spectrum yielded 0.73(±0.02) and 1.08(±0.07) for NADH with 0.76(±0.04) and 1.07(±0.09) for NADPH. This indicated that the two-photon transitions leading to emission from the short and longer lived states in these molecules have fundamentally different transition tensor structures.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative fluorescence intensity decays of 1 mM NADH in aqueous solution excited at 705 nm using (a) linearly polarized 2PA, (b) circularly polarized 2PA, and (c) 1PA at 360 nm excitation. Weighted residuals (W.R.) are the ratio of the difference between the model and the data and the expected standard deviation, calculated using eq 32.

Table 1. Biexponential Fitting Parameters of Fluorescence Intensity Decays of NADH and NADPH in Aqueous Buffer, across the Tuning Spectrum of the Ti:Sapphire Laser and with Single-Photon Excitation at 360 nm for Comparison.

    linear circular
  λ/nm α1 τ1/ns τ2/ns α1 τ1/ns τ2/ns
NADH 705 0.73(±0.06) 0.344(±0.009) 0.69(±0.02) 0.69(±0.05) 0.315(±0.007) 0.70(±0.01)
  715 0.86(±0.06) 0.367(±0.009) 0.93(±0.08) 0.78(±0.09) 0.34(±0.02) 0.79(±0.06)
  725 0.86(±0.02) 0.380(±0.004) 0.78(±0.01) 0.72(±0.03) 0.330(±0.005) 0.68(±0.01)
  735 0.83(±0.02) 0.366(±0.004) 0.77(±0.01) 0.78(±0.03) 0.350(±0.005) 0.76(±0.01)
  745 0.82(±0.02) 0.378(±0.004) 0.78(±0.01) 0.86(±0.03) 0.391(±0.004) 0.84(±0.02)
  755 0.87(±0.03) 0.395(±0.005) 0.84(±0.03) 0.80(±0.03) 0.357(±0.006) 0.78(±0.02)
  765 0.88(±0.02) 0.396(±0.004) 0.90(±0.03) 0.82(±0.03) 0.365(±0.005) 0.81(±0.02)
  mean 0.85(±0.01) 0.379(±0.002) 0.78(±0.01) 0.79(±0.01) 0.357(±0.002) 0.74(±0.01)
  360 0.83(±0.02) 0.382(±0.005) 0.72(±0.02)
NADPH 705 0.8(±0.2) 0.41(±0.03) 0.9(±0.1) 0.7(±0.1) 0.27(±0.01) 0.73(±0.01)
  715 0.79(±0.05) 0.349(±0.008) 0.72(±0.02) 0.76(±0.06) 0.321(±0.009) 0.72(±0.02)
  725 0.80(±0.06) 0.36(±0.01) 0.73(±0.03) 0.7(±0.1) 0.29(±0.01) 0.68(±0.02)
  735 0.81(±0.04) 0.354(±0.007) 0.78(±0.02) 0.68(±0.08) 0.285(±0.009) 0.72(±0.02)
  745 0.83(±0.04) 0.373(±0.007) 0.77(±0.02) 0.79(±0.05) 0.327(±0.009) 0.73(±0.02)
  755 0.86(±0.05) 0.40(±0.01) 0.84(±0.05) 0.80(±0.04) 0.348(±0.008) 0.79(±0.02)
  765 0.81(±0.06) 0.37(±0.01) 0.83(±0.03) 0.75(±0.06) 0.319(±0.009) 0.78(±0.02)
  mean 0.82(±0.02) 0.366(±0.003) 0.77(±0.01) 0.76(±0.02) 0.315(±0.003) 0.73(±0.01)
  360 0.85(±0.03) 0.378(±0.006) 0.77(±0.02)
combined 2PA 0.84(±0.01) 0.374(±0.002) 0.78(±0.01) 0.78(±0.01) 0.346(±0.002) 0.73(±0.01)
  1PA 0.84(±0.02) 0.380(±0.004) 0.74(±0.01)

Polarization-Dependent 2P Excitation Spectra

For the heterogeneous populations encountered in NAD(P)H, the 2PA cross section measured here will be a weighted average of the individual cross sections of the two species. Under these conditions, the steady state fluorescence intensity at each excitation wavelength can be related to the constituent concentrations C1 = 1 and C2 = 2 using eq 27 according to

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m044.jpg 39

We assume a common radiative decay rate krad for both species10

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m045.jpg 40

where

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m046.jpg 41

From the fluorescence decay dynamics (eqs 17 and 18) we know that the normalized pre-exponential factors are given by

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m047.jpg 42
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m048.jpg 43

where k is a constant of proportionality. Using eq 33, we can write

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m049.jpg 44
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m050.jpg 45

Then, in terms of circular and linear polarizations, we have

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m051.jpg 46
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m052.jpg 47
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m053.jpg 48
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m054.jpg 49

These quantities are plotted in Figure 4, where it can be seen that, in both NADH and NADPH, the highest intensity emission is observed with linearly polarized excitation of the short lifetime species. In contrast, the longer lifetime state displays similar emission intensities with circular and linear polarized two-photon excitation. This again implies differences in the 2PA tensor structures of the two species; circular polarization favors off-diagonal elements, requiring simultaneous action by the applied electric field along two orthogonal axes, whereas linear polarization favors diagonal transition terms, corresponding to two parallel transition moments requiring simultaneous action twice along a single symmetry axis.22

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relative fluorescence intensity of the two NAD(P)H species as a function of excitation wavelength, with the short lifetime linearly polarized peak of each molecule arbitrarily scaled to 1. While the short lifetime species favors linearly polarized excitation in both NADH and NADPH (a and b), the longer lifetime species exhibits similar fluorescence intensities with both excitation polarizations (c and d). Shaded areas represent uncertainty bounds.

Individual Transition Tensor Structures

The initial single-photon fluorescence anisotropies in NADH and NADPH were found to be 0.36(±0.07) and 0.35(±0.05) respectively, corresponding to transition dipole moment angles θM of 20(±10)° for NADH and 16(±9)° for NADPH (see Figure 5 and Table 2). Averaged across all excitation wavelengths, the initial anisotropies following linearly and circularly polarized two-photon absorption of NADH were 0.52(±0.02) and −0.24(±0.03). For NADPH, the corresponding values were 0.55(±0.05) and −0.25(±0.04). The circularly polarized rotational correlation times for NADH of 0.253(±0.002) and NADPH of 0.304(±0.005) ns were faster than the corresponding linearly polarized measurements of 0.323(±0.002) and 0.336(±0.003) ns. Differences between linear and circularly polarized fluorescence anisotropy decay times in a homogeneous population can be indicative of the presence of off-diagonal transition tensor elements.26,27 Treating NADH and NADPH as a homogeneous systems (using Ω̅) and solving eqs 47 suggested a primarily single element tensor, as shown in Table 3. However, when one solved for the tensor elements with the separate values of Ω1 and Ω2, differences in 2PA between the two species became apparent. Specifically, in both NADH and NADPH, while the short lifetime state was dominated by a single element, the longer lifetime state contained a significant negative diagonal element averaging S = −0.32(±0.04). Polar plots of the 2PA tensors63 of the two species are shown in Figure 6, which demonstrates that the effect of the negative value of S in the longer lifetime species is the presence of distinct negative amplitude lobes in the polar plot and a rotation of the principal axis of the tensor. The angle of rotation is calculated by differentiating eq 38 to find the turning point

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m055.jpg 50
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m056.jpg 51

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Representative fluorescence anisotropy decays of 1 mM NADH in aqueous solution excited at 705 nm using (a) linearly polarized 2PA, (b) circularly polarized 2PA, and (c) 1PA at 360 nm excitation. Weighted residuals (W.R.) are the ratio of the difference between the model and the data and the expected standard deviation, calculated using eq 35.

Table 2. Fluorescence Anisotropy Decay Parameters of NADH and NADPH in Aqueous Buffer, across the Tuning Spectrum of the Ti:Sapphire Laser and with Single-Photon Excitation at 360 nm for Comparison.

    linear
circular
  λ/nm RL(0) τLrot/ns RC(0) τCrot/ns
NADH 705 0.53(±0.07) 0.277(±0.006) –0.2(±0.1) 0.27(±0.01)
  715 0.5(±0.1) 0.279(±0.005) –0.28(±0.08) 0.260(±0.007)
  725 0.55(±0.08) 0.290(±0.004) –0.25(±0.08) 0.264(±0.008)
  735 0.5(±0.1) 0.324(±0.009) –0.25(±0.08) 0.244(±0.007)
  745 0.50(±0.03) 0.346(±0.002) –0.23(±0.05) 0.252(±0.004)
  755 0.52(±0.08) 0.323(±0.005) –0.24(±0.08) 0.246(±0.007)
  765 0.5(±0.1) 0.360(±0.007) –0.25(±0.08) 0.249(±0.007)
  mean 0.52(±0.02) 0.323(±0.002) –0.24(±0.03) 0.253(±0.002)
  360 0.36(±0.07) 0.258(±0.006)
NADPH 705 0.5(±0.3) 0.28(±0.02) –0.3(±0.1) 0.32(±0.01)
  715 0.5(±0.1) 0.308(±0.008) –0.2(±0.1) 0.28(±0.01)
  725 0.5(±0.1) 0.364(±0.007) –0.3(±0.1) 0.35(±0.02)
  735 0.6(±0.1) 0.316(±0.008) –0.3(±0.1) 0.29(±0.02)
  745 0.6(±0.1) 0.357(±0.007) –0.25(±0.08) 0.35(±0.01)
  755 0.6(±0.1) 0.338(±0.009) –0.2(±0.1) 0.30(±0.02)
  765 0.5(±0.2) 0.364(±0.01) –0.2(±0.2) 0.25(±0.01)
  mean 0.55(±0.05) 0.336(±0.003) –0.25(±0.04) 0.304(±0.005)
  360 0.35(±0.05) 0.42(±0.01)
combined 2PA 0.52(±0.02) –0.25(±0.02)
  1PA 0.36(±0.04)

Table 3. Tensor Components for the Two Fluorescence Decay Components of NADH and NADPHa.

  short lifetime species
long lifetime species
homogeneous treatment
  S D S D S D
NADH –0.06(±0.02) –0.02(±0.05) –0.33(±0.05) 0(±0.1) –0.09(±0.01) –0.03(±0.05)
NADPH –0.07(±0.05) 0(±0.1) –0.29(±0.07) 0.1(±0.2) –0.07(±0.03) 0(±0.1)
combined –0.06(±0.02) 0(±0.04) –0.32(±0.04) 0.1(±0.1) –0.09(±0.01) –0.03(±0.05)
a

In both molecules, the long lifetime species exhibits a significant negative diagonal element, in contrast to the primarily single element short lifetime species. These differences could not be observed if the analysis assumed a homogeneous system. As the tensor components of the two molecules are identical, suggesting that the phosphate group which differentiates between them plays no role in the transition, the datasets were combined to reduce uncertainties before plotting in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

2PA tensor polar plots for the combined NADH and NADPH data displayed in Table 3. The distance of the line to the origin dictates the transition amplitude at each angle. Red and blue lines indicate positive and negative amplitudes, respectively. Shaded areas represent uncertainty bounds. While the short lifetime tensor is dominated by a single element (a), the long lifetime species exhibits negative lobes which rotate the direction of maximum absorption by around 3° from the single-photon S0–S1 transition (b). These features could not be resolved if the excited state population was treated as homogeneous (c).

The combined values in Table 3 imply θturn = 3(±4)° for the long lifetime species.

Discussion

We have identified clear differences in the structures of the two-photon transitions giving rise to the short and long lifetime fluorescent species of NADH and NADPH. Our work therefore rules out two proposed, but unproven, mechanisms for the heterogeneous intensity decay dynamics observed. Dynamic quenching by the adenine moiety in the folded state has been widely assumed,14,15 while a kinetic scheme involving a single emitting excited state species with conversion into a nonfluorescent product has also been proposed.12 As these are both postexcitation phenomena, the 2PA transition would be common to both components, which is clearly not observed here.

Opposing signs of SXX and SYY in the 2PA tensor of the long lifetime NAD(P)H species caused negative lobes that were absent in the short lifetime species. Parallels can be drawn between these results and the behavior of the 1Lb absorption band of indole.64,65 Callis63 observed negative lobes to be present in the 2PA tensor of pure indole, which were then reduced significantly upon the addition of a single methyl group to the pyrole ring. The difference in the 2PA tensors of the short and long lifetime species of NAD(P)H clearly cannot be attributed to differing substituent groups. However, alternate configurations of the nicotinamide ring have previously been suggested to play a role in the spectral properties of the molecule, particularly those involving the amide group.2,13 Both 1PA and 2PA are predicted to be accompanied by charge transfer from the pyridine ring nitrogen to the oxygen of the amide group,18 which favors the cis conformation displayed in Figure 1.66 A trans conformation, in which the amide group is rotated by 180°, can also be adopted67 (see Figure 1). The contrasting electronic rearrangement taking place following absorption in each species, due to the differing location of the oxygen atom relative to the ring nitrogen in the two configurations, may then be sufficient to alter the symmetry of the two-photon transition. Enzyme binding sites are known to favor the trans conformation of NAD(P)H67 in addition to altering its local electrostatic environment.68 It is possible that these effects could also contribute to the photophysical alterations induced by the binding of NADH and NADPH to different enzymes. This will be the subject of future studies.

Quantum chemical calculations have predicted a single element 2PA tensor for the nicotinamide chromophore as we observed in the short lifetime species, with the principal axis collinear to the 1PA transition dipole.18 These calculations involved a free energy minimization step, so were likely carried out on the cis configuration of the amide group as the free energy of the trans form is 1 kcal mol–1 higher.67 For a difference in Gibbs free energy ΔG, the relative amounts of each species present at equilibrium are given by69

graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m057.jpg 52
graphic file with name jp-2019-01236k_m058.jpg 53

where R is the universal gas constant and T is the temperature. At a lab temperature of 21 °C, 85% of the NAD(P)H population would be expected to assume the cis configuration and 15% the trans configuration. These values are in precise agreement with the linearly polarized decay amplitudes we measure here. If the two components in the fluorescence decay of NAD(P)H do indeed correspond to the cis and trans form of the nicotinamide ring, this would imply α1lin = γcis = 0.85 and α2 = γtrans = 0.15. By eqs 42 and 43, the linearly polarized 2PA cross sections of the two species would therefore be equal, which could explain the absence of characteristic spectral features corresponding to each fluorescent species in the absorption spectra.2,50,58 The circularly polarized 2PA cross section of the short lifetime species would then be a factor of Ω1 = 0.74 lower, causing the smaller contribution of this component to the fluorescence decay with circularly polarized two-photon excitation.

Our previous work suggested that the contrasting lifetimes of the two fluorescent species of NAD(P)H arise from differences in the shape of the potential energy surfaces encountered as they undergo nonradiative conformational relaxation back to the ground state.10 Specifically, the frequency of the initial potential energy well of short lifetime species was double that of the long lifetime species, leading to a nonradiative rate twice as large. The small magnitudes of the initial well frequencies were consistent with small scale motion for the conformational relaxation, such as the puckering that occurs in the nicotinamide ring.70 Interestingly, this puckering is known to be altered in the trans state,67 which could lead to the differences in well frequencies and therefore the different lifetimes. Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy measurements are potentially sensitive to such differences in molecular structure. In the present study, rapid monoexponential anisotropy decay times (approaching the MCP-PMT response) were observed for NAD(P)H. In our previous work,10 the increased fluorescence intensity afforded by 1PA, together with the enhanced quantum yield and slower (nanosecond) rotational diffusion times of NAD(P)H in more viscous environments, revealed associated (heterogeneous) anisotropy decay dynamics with distinct rotational diffusion times of the two subpopulations. In both NADH and NADPH, the rotational diffusion rates of the long lifetime species were on average 1.9 times lower than those of the short lifetime species. From the Stokes–Einstein–Debye equation, this implies differing form factors or hydrodynamic volumes for the two species.10 The amide group lies approximately 20° out of the plane of the nicotinamide ring in the trans configuration,67 which could provide a physical basis for these observations.

It had previously been shown16 that the potential energy barrier encountered by both species during conformational relaxation was equal at 1.5 kcal mol–1. The barrier encountered during the cis-trans transition is almost five times larger.67 Alongside our previous data suggesting that the variation in nonradiative decay rate with viscosity was inconsistent with the internal conversion involving an isomerization,10 this implies that no switching between the cis and trans configurations occurs in the excited state dynamics. The heterogeneous fluorescence decay dynamics of NAD(P)H solutions therefore correspond to two distinct ground state species, with separate 2PA transition tensors and dissimilar lifetimes due to different conformational relaxation rates.

Conclusions

Knowledge of the 2PA polarization ratio Ω has proven to be an invaluable means of determining the 2PA transition tensor and the symmetry of the participating states. Measurement of Ω has, until now, been the preserve of steady state or time-averaged fluorescence intensity measurements. While this is a valid approach in the study of 2PA in homogeneous populations, we have shown that for heterogeneous systems Ω is related to the constituent 2PA transitions by a ratio of decay amplitudes and lifetimes which steady state measurements cannot provide. The introduction of time-resolved fluorescence measurements is therefore required to extract the individual Ω values of each species. It is then possible to determine the 2D tensor elements of the individual 2PA transitions by introducing linear and circularly polarized fluorescence anisotropy measurements. We have utilized this approach to show, for the first time, that the biexponential fluorescence decay in NAD(P)H arises from two distinct 2PA processes with different transition tensor structures. Our results point to the existence of structural differences in the nicotinamide ring of the two subpopulations as the underlying cause of the observed difference in their nonradiative activated barrier crossing decay rates,10 and they do not accord with postabsorption mechanisms such as intermolecular quenching or excited state reactions.12,14,15 An enhanced understanding of NAD(P)H photophysics will assist in promoting its use as an accurate, endogenously fluorescent reporter of intercellular biochemistry.38 The approaches outlined here will also find immediate application in other biological fluorescence studies where heterogeneous populations are known to exist, in particular those involving fluorescent proteins,71,72 and the state restriction observed in their Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) dynamics.25,54,73

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by BBSRC Grant BB/P018726/1, “New approaches to studying redox metabolism using time-resolved NAD(P)H fluorescence and anisotropy”.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Special Issue

Published as part of The Journal of Physical Chemistry virtual special issue “Hai-Lung Dai Festschrift”.

References

  1. Ying W. NAD+/NADH and NADP+/NADPH in Cellular Functions and Cell Death: Regulation and Biological Consequences. Antioxid. Redox Signaling 2008, 10 (2), 179–206. 10.1089/ars.2007.1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. De Ruyck J. J.; Famerée M.; Wouters J.; Perpète E. A.; Preat J.; Jacquemin D. Towards the Understanding of the Absorption Spectra of NAD(P)H/NAD(P)+ as a Common Indicator of Dehydrogenase Enzymatic Activity. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 450 (1–3), 119–122. 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.10.092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blacker T. S.; Duchen M. R. Investigating Mitochondrial Redox State Using NADH and NADPH Autofluorescence. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2016, 100, 53–65. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Horilova J.; Mateasik A.; Revilla-i-Domingo R.; Raible F.; Chorvat D. Jr; Chorvatova A. M. Fingerprinting of Metabolic States by NAD (P) H Fluorescence Lifetime Spectroscopy in Living Cells: A Review. Med. Photonics 2015, 27, 62–69. 10.1016/j.medpho.2014.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schaefer P. M.; Kalinina S.; Rueck A.; von Arnim C. A. F.; von Einem B. NADH Autofluorescence - A Marker on Its Way to Boost Bioenergetic Research. Cytometry, Part A 2019, 95, 34–46. 10.1002/cyto.a.23597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kolenc O. I.; Quinn K. P. Evaluating Cell Metabolism Through Autofluorescence Imaging of NAD (P) H and FAD. Antioxid. Redox Signaling 2019, 30, 875–889. 10.1089/ars.2017.7451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blacker T. S.; Sewell M. D. E.; Szabadkai G.; Duchen M. R. Metabolic Profiling of Live Cancer Tissues Using NAD (P) H Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1928, 365–387. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9027-6_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blacker T. S.; Duchen M. R. Characterizing Metabolic States Using Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) of NAD(P)H. Neuromethods 2017, 123, 133–150. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6890-9_7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee H. B.; Cong A.; Leopold H.; Currie M.; Boersma A.; Sheets E. D.; Heikal A. A. Rotational and Translational Diffusion of Size-Dependent Fluorescent Probes in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Environments. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 24045–24057. 10.1039/C8CP03873B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blacker T. S.; Marsh R. J.; Duchen M. R.; Bain A. J. Activated Barrier Crossing Dynamics in the Non-Radiative Decay of NADH and NADPH. Chem. Phys. 2013, 422, 184–194. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2013.02.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Visser A. J. W. G.; Hoek A. v. The Fluorescence Decay of Reduced Nicotinamides in Aqueous Solution after Excitation with a UV-Mode Locked Locked Ar ION Laser. Photochem. Photobiol. 1981, 33 (1), 35–40. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1981.tb04293.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gafni A.; Brand L. Fluorescence Decay Studies of Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide in Solution and Bound to Liver Alcohol Dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 1976, 15 (15), 3165–3171. 10.1021/bi00660a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hull R. V.; Conger P. S. 3rd; Hoobler R. J. Conformation of NADH Studied by Fluorescence Excitation Transfer Spectroscopy. Biophys. Chem. 2001, 90 (1), 9–16. 10.1016/S0301-4622(00)00239-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghukasyan V. V.; Kao F.-J. Monitoring Cellular Metabolism with Fluorescence Lifetime of Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (27), 11532–11540. 10.1021/jp810931u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Skala M. C.; Riching K. M.; Bird D. K.; Gendron-Fitzpatrick A.; Eickhoff J.; Eliceiri K. W.; Keely P. J.; Ramanujam N. In Vivo Multiphoton Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging of Protein-Bound and Free Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide in Normal and Precancerous Epithelia. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12 (2), 024014. 10.1117/1.2717503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Couprie M. E.; Mérola F.; Tauc P.; Garzella D.; Delboulbé A.; Hara T.; Billardon M. First Use of the UV Super-ACO Free-Electron Laser: Fluorescence Decays and Rotational Dynamics of the NADH Coenzyme. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1994, 65 (5), 1485. 10.1063/1.1144880. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Heiner Z.; Roland T.; Leonard J.; Haacke S.; Groma G. I. Kinetics of Light-Induced Intramolecular Energy Transfer in Different Conformational States of NADH. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121 (34), 8037–8045. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b04753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kierdaszuk B.; Malak H.; Gryczynski I.; Callis P.; Lakowicz J. R. Fluorescence of Reduced Nicotinamides Using One- and Two-Photon Excitation. Biophys. Chem. 1996, 62 (1–3), 1–13. 10.1016/S0301-4622(96)02182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krishnamoorthy G.; Periasamy N.; Venkataraman B. On the Origin of Heterogeneity of Fluorescence Decay Kinetics of Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1987, 144 (1), 387–392. 10.1016/S0006-291X(87)80522-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brink D. M.; Satchler G. R.. Angular Momentum; Clarendon Press: 1968. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bray R. G.; Hochstrasser R.-M. Two-Photon Absorption by Rotating Diatomic Molecules. Mol. Phys. 1976, 31 (4), 1199–1211. 10.1080/00268977600100931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bain A. J. Multiphoton Processes. Photonics 2015, 1, 279–320. 10.1002/9781119009719.ch9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Drucker R. P.; McClain W. M. Polarized Two-Photon Studies of Biphenyl and Several Derivatives. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 61 (7), 2609–2615. 10.1063/1.1682387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wan C.; Johnson C. K. Time-Resolved Two-Photon Induced Anisotropy Decay: The Rotational Diffusion Regime. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101 (12), 10283. 10.1063/1.467908. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Masters T. A.; Marsh R. J.; Blacker T. S.; Armoogum D. A.; Larijani B.; Bain A. J. Polarized Two-Photon Photoselection in EGFP: Theory and Experiment. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 134311. 10.1063/1.5011642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ryderfors L.; Mukhtar E.; Johansson L. B.-A. The Symmetry of Two-Photon Excited States as Determined by Time-Resolved Fluorescence Depolarization Experiments. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111 (45), 11531–11539. 10.1021/jp074506g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ryderfors L.; Mukhtar E.; Johansson L. B.-Å. Excited-State Symmetry and Reorientation Dynamics of Perylenes in Liquid Solutions: Time-Resolved Fluorescence Depolarization Studies Using One-and Two-Photon Excitation. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112 (26), 5794–5803. 10.1021/jp8015694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Callis P. R. Two-Photon-Induced Fluorescence. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1997, 48, 271–297. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Callis P. R.; Scott T. W.; Albrecht A. C. Polarized Two-Photon Fluorescence Excitation Studies of Pyrimidine. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 75 (12), 5640–5646. 10.1063/1.442003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Berg J. O.; Parker D. H.; El-Sayed M. A. Symmetry Assignment of Two-Photon States from Polarization Characteristics of Multiphoton Ionization Spectra. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68 (12), 5661–5663. 10.1063/1.435666. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Scott T. W.; Albrecht A. C. A Rydberg Transition in Benzene in the Condensed Phase: Two-Photon Fluorescence Excitation Studies. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74 (7), 3807–3812. 10.1063/1.441610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Scott T. W.; Haber K. S.; Albrecht A. C. Two-Photon Photoselection in Rigid Solutions: A Study of the B 2 U← A 1 G Transition in Benzene. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78 (1), 150–157. 10.1063/1.444526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Monson P. R.; McClain W. M. Complete Polarization Study of the Two-Photon Absorption of Liquid 1-Chloronaphthalene. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56 (10), 4817–4825. 10.1063/1.1676956. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yu J.-A.; Nocera D. G.; Leroi G. E. Two-Photon Excitation Spectrum of Perylene in Solution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 167 (1–2), 85–89. 10.1016/0009-2614(90)85075-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Faidas H.; Siomos K. Two-Photon Excitation Spectroscopy of Benzene and Toluene in Nonpolar Liquids. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1988, 130 (2), 288–302. 10.1016/0022-2852(88)90078-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pauls S. W.; Hedstrom J. F.; Johnson C. K. Rotational Relaxation of Perylene in N-Alcohols and N-Alkanes Studied by Two-Photon-Induced Anisotropy Decay. Chem. Phys. 1998, 237 (1), 205–222. 10.1016/S0301-0104(98)00209-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dick B.; Gonska H.; Hohlneicher G. Two Photon Spectroscopy of Dipole Forbidden Transitions III. Experimental Determination of Two Photon Absorption Spectra Including Polarization Control. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für Phys. Chemie 1981, 85 (8), 746–754. 10.1002/bbpc.19810850805. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vivas M. G.; Diaz C.; Echevarria L.; Mendonca C. R.; Hernández F. E.; De Boni L. Two-Photon Circular–Linear Dichroism of Perylene in Solution: A Theoretical–Experimental Study. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117 (9), 2742–2747. 10.1021/jp311065n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wirth M. J.; Koskelo A. C.; Mohler C. E. Study of Solvation Symmetry by Two-Photon Polarization Measurements. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87 (22), 4395–4400. 10.1021/j100245a016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Chuang T. J.; Eisenthal K. B. Theory of Fluorescence Depolarization by Anisotropic Rotational Diffusion. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 57 (12), 5094–5097. 10.1063/1.1678194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Salthammer T. Numerical Simulation of Pile-up Distorted Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting (TCSPC) Data. J. Fluoresc. 1992, 2 (1), 23–27. 10.1007/BF00866385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Xu C.; Webb W. W. Measurement of Two-Photon Excitation Cross Sections of Molecular Fluorophores with Data from 690 to 1050 Nm. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1996, 13 (3), 481–491. 10.1364/JOSAB.13.000481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kennedy S. M.; Lytle F. E. P-Bis (O-Methylstyryl) Benzene as a Power-Squared Sensor for Two-Photon Absorption Measurements between 537 and 694 Nm. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58 (13), 2643–2647. 10.1021/ac00126a014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fisher W. G.; Wachter E. A.; Lytle F. E.; Armas M.; Seaton C. Source-Corrected Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence Measurements between 700 and 880 Nm. Appl. Spectrosc. 1998, 52 (4), 536–545. 10.1366/0003702981944085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zipfel W. R.https://zipfellab.bme.cornell.edu/cross_sections.html.
  46. Schiebener P.; Straub J.; Levelt Sengers J. M. H.; Gallagher J. S. Refractive Index of Water and Steam as Function of Wavelength, Temperature and Density. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1990, 19 (3), 677–717. 10.1063/1.555859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rheims J.; Köser J.; Wriedt T. Refractive-Index Measurements in the near-IR Using an Abbe Refractometer. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8 (6), 601. 10.1088/0957-0233/8/6/003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ding X.-F.; et al. Measurement of the Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Bis-MSB. Chin. Phys. C 2015, 39 (12), 126001. 10.1088/1674-1137/39/12/126001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Faraggi M.; Peretz P.; Rosenthal I.; Weinraub D. Solution Properties of Dye Lasers. Rhodamine B in Alcohols. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 103, 310–314. 10.1016/0009-2614(84)80013-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ziegenhorn J.; Senn M.; Bücher T. Molar Absorptivities of Beta-NADH and Beta-NADPH. Clin. Chem. 1976, 22 (2), 151–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Du H.; Fuh R. C. A.; Li J.; Corkan L. A.; Lindsey J. S. PhotochemCAD: A Computer-Aided Design and Research Tool in Photochemistry. Photochem. Photobiol. 1998, 68 (2), 141–142. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1998.tb02480.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Patterson G. H.; Knobel S. M.; Arkhammar P.; Thastrup O.; Piston D. W. Separation of the Glucose-Stimulated Cytoplasmic and Mitochondrial NAD(P)H Responses in Pancreatic Islet Beta Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97 (10), 5203–5207. 10.1073/pnas.090098797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lakowicz J. R.; Gryczynski I. Characterization of P-Bis (O-Methylstyryl) Benzene as a Lifetime and Anisotropy Decay Standard for Two-Photon Induced Fluorescence. Biophys. Chem. 1993, 47 (1), 1–7. 10.1016/0301-4622(93)80027-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Blacker T. S.; Chen W.; Avezov E.; Marsh R. J.; Duchen M. R.; Kaminski C. F.; Bain A. J. Investigating State Restriction in Fluorescent Protein FRET Using Time-Resolved Fluorescence and Anisotropy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121 (3), 1507–1514. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Blacker T. S.; Mann Z. F.; Gale J. E.; Ziegler M.; Bain A. J.; Szabadkai G.; Duchen M. R. Separating NADH and NADPH Fluorescence in Live Cells and Tissues Using FLIM. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3936. 10.1038/ncomms4936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zipfel W. R.; Williams R. M.; Christie R.; Nikitin A. Y.; Hyman B. T.; Webb W. W. Live Tissue Intrinsic Emission Microscopy Using Multiphoton-Excited Native Fluorescence and Second Harmonic Generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100 (12), 7075–7080. 10.1073/pnas.0832308100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Huang S.; Heikal A. A.; Webb W. W. Two-Photon Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Microscopy of NAD(P)H and Flavoprotein. Biophys. J. 2002, 82 (5), 2811–2825. 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75621-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rover L. Jr; Fernandes J. C. B.; de Oliveira Neto G.; Kubota L. T.; Katekawa E.; Serrano S. H. P. Study of NADH Stability Using Ultraviolet–visible Spectrophotometric Analysis and Factorial Design. Anal. Biochem. 1998, 260 (1), 50–55. 10.1006/abio.1998.2656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. de Wergifosse M.; Elles C. G.; Krylov A. I. Two-Photon Absorption Spectroscopy of Stilbene and Phenanthrene: Excited-State Analysis and Comparison with Ethylene and Toluene. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146 (17), 174102. 10.1063/1.4982045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ramalingam S.; Periandy S.; Govindarajan M.; Mohan S. FT-IR and FT-Raman Vibrational Spectra and Molecular Structure Investigation of Nicotinamide: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2010, 75 (5), 1552–1558. 10.1016/j.saa.2010.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vasyutinskii O. S.; Smolin A. G.; Oswald C.; Gericke K. H. Polarized Fluorescence in NADH under Two-Photon Excitation with Femtosecond Laser Pulses. Opt. Spectrosc. 2017, 122 (4), 602–606. 10.1134/S0030400X17040208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kasha M. Characterization of Electronic Transitions in Complex Molecules. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1950, 9, 14. 10.1039/df9500900014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Callis P. R. On the Theory of Two-Photon Induced Fluorescence Anisotropy with Application to Indoles. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99 (1), 27–37. 10.1063/1.465805. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Albinsson B.; Norden B. Excited-State Properties of the Indole Chromophore: Electronic Transition Moment Directions from Linear Dichroism Measurements: Effect of Methyl and Methoxy Substituents. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96 (15), 6204–6212. 10.1021/j100194a023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sobolewski A. L.; Domcke W. Ab Initio Investigations on the Photophysics of Indole. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 315, 293–298. 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01249-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kumar M.; Jaiswal S.; Singh R.; Srivastav G.; Singh P.; Yadav T. N.; Yadav R. A. Ab Initio Studies of Molecular Structures, Conformers and Vibrational Spectra of Heterocyclic Organics: I. Nicotinamide and Its N-Oxide. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2010, 75 (1), 281–292. 10.1016/j.saa.2009.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wu Y. D.; Houk K. N. Theoretical Study of Conformational Features of NAD+ and NADH Analogs: Protonated Nicotinamide and 1,4-Dihydronicotinamide. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58 (8), 2043–2045. 10.1021/jo00060a017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nakabayashi T.; Islam M. S.; Li L.; Yasuda M.; Ohta N. Studies on External Electric Field Effects on Absorption and Fluorescence Spectra of NADH. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014, 595, 25–30. 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.01.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Nelson P.; Radosavljević M.; Bromberg S.. Biological Physics: Energy, Information, Life; W. H. Freeman and Company: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wu Y. D.; Houk K. N. Theoretical Evaluation of Conformational Preferences of NAD+ and NADH: An Approach to Understanding the Stereospecificity of NAD+/NADH-Dependent Dehydrogenases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113 (7), 2353–2358. 10.1021/ja00007a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Drobizhev M.; Makarov N. S.; Tillo S. E.; Hughes T. E.; Rebane A. Two-Photon Absorption Properties of Fluorescent Proteins. Nat. Methods 2011, 8 (5), 393–399. 10.1038/nmeth.1596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Drobizhev M.; Tillo S.; Makarov N. S.; Hughes T. E.; Rebane A. Absolute Two-Photon Absorption Spectra and Two-Photon Brightness of Orange and Red Fluorescent Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113 (4), 855–859. 10.1021/jp8087379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Masters T. A.; Marsh R. J.; Armoogum D. A.; Nicolaou N.; Larijani B. B.; Bain A. J. Restricted State Selection in Fluorescent Protein Forster Resonance Energy Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (21), 7883–7890. 10.1021/ja312230b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES