Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Sep 14;159(11):2193–2207. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3318-6

Microsurgical versus Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Resection for Acromegaly: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications

Ching-Jen Chen 1, Natasha Ironside 2, I Jonathan Pomeraniec 1, Srinivas Chivukula 3, Thomas J Buell 1, Dale Ding 3, Davis G Taylor 1, Robert F Dallapiazza 1, Cheng-Chia Lee 4, Marvin Bergsneider 5
PMCID: PMC6558977  NIHMSID: NIHMS1025351  PMID: 28913667

Abstract

Purpose:

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the long-term endocrine outcomes and postoperative complications following endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal resection (TSR) for the treatment of acromegaly.

Methods:

A literature review was performed, and studies with at least five patients who underwent TSR for acromegaly, reporting biochemical remission criteria and long-term remission outcomes were included. Data extracted from each study included surgical technique, perioperative complications, biochemical remission criteria and long-term remission outcomes.

Results:

Fifty-two case series from 1976 to 2016 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4,375 patients. Thirty-six reports were microsurgical (n=3,144) and thirteen were endoscopic (n=940). Three studies compared microsurgical (n=111) to endoscopic TSR outcomes (n=180). The overall initial and long-term remission rates were 58.2% vs. 57.4% and 69.2% vs. 70.2% for the microsurgical and endoscopic groups, respectively. For microadenomas, the initial and long-term remission rates were 77.6% vs. 82.2% and 76.9% vs. 73.5% for microsurgical and endoscopic approaches, respectively. For macroadenomas, the initial and long-term remission rates were 46.9% vs. 60.0% 40.2% vs. 61.5% for microsurgical and endoscopic approaches, respectively. The rates of postoperative CSF leak were 3.0% vs. 2.3% for the microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively. The rates of hypopituitarism and transient diabetes insipidus were 6.7% vs. 6.4% and 9.0% vs. 7.8% for the microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively.

Conclusions:

Both endoscopic and microsurgical approaches for TSR of growth hormone-secreting adenomas are viable treatment options for patients with acromegaly, and yield similarly high rates of remission under the most current consensus criteria.

Keywords: acromegaly, growth hormone, pituitary adenoma, transsphenoidal, endoscopic, microscopic, review

Introduction

Acromegaly, arising from a growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma, is an uncommon disorder that causes significant morbidity and mortality. [14] Transsphenoidal resection (TSR), the preferred first-line treatment for acromegaly, has the ability to achieve biochemical and clinical remission upon complete adenoma extirpation, with modest complication rates. [59] Significant improvements in life expectancy have been associated with successful adenoma resection. [10]

Microscopic TSR, which has been the mainstay of surgical management over the past fifty years, has since been partially supplanted by the innovation and refinement of the endoscopic technique. [1120] Although endoscopic TSR has grown in popularity among neurosurgeons, recent series have been generally remiss of large patient cohorts, reporting of operative complications, and comparison of long-term endocrine outcomes to those achieved by microscopic TSR. As such, the optimal surgical approach for the resection of GH-secreting adenomas remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the endocrine outcomes and postoperative complication rates of microscopic vs. endoscopic TSR for the treatment of acromegaly.

Methods

Inclusion criteria

Studies qualified for inclusion in the final analysis based on the following criteria: (1) patients with clinical stigmata and biochemical features consistent with a diagnosis of acromegaly; (2) at least five patients who underwent initial or revision TSR; (3) reporting of biochemical remission criteria, and immediate and long-term remission outcomes; and (4) English language. Studies published before the pioneering case series on the endoscopic approach for pituitary adenomas in 1997 were considered microsurgical series by default. [21] Studies published after this date were excluded if the approach was not specified, or if an endoscope was used to augment the microsurgical approach.

Literature Search

No registered review protocol was utilized in this study. This review follows the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases was conducted on June 10, 2017 using the search term: “transsphenoidal AND acromegaly AND adenoma.” Following the search, the articles were then screened by title and abstract. The remaining articles underwent full text review for eligibility, as set forth in the inclusion criteria.

Literature Review and Data Extraction

Included studies were stratified based on their use of a microsurgical or endoscopic technique. Study-specific criteria for biochemical remission were noted and used as the definition of remission. When reported, the following clinical outcomes were extracted: achievement of initial postoperative biochemical remission, perioperative complications, relapse rates, and biochemical remission rates at last follow-up. Perioperative complications included intra- and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, vascular injuries, visual deficits, endocrine abnormalities, meningitis, epistaxis, and transient or permanent diabetes insipidus (DI). In patients who did not achieve initial remission, adjuvant therapy included medical therapy, radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and/or repeat TSR. When information on tumor size was available, patients were further classified into four subgroups: (1) microsurgery-microadenoma, (2) microsurgery-macroadenoma, (3) endoscopy-microadenoma, and (4) endoscopy-macroadenoma. The definition of micro- and macroadenoma was study-specific. Giant adenomas (≥3cm) were classified as macroadenomas.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., 2014). Descriptive statistics of pooled data from microsurgical and endoscopic series were obtained for the following outcomes: initial biochemical remission, relapse, biochemical remission at last follow-up, perioperative complications, and adjuvant therapy. Unclear risks of bias were assumed for retrospective studies.

Results

Study selection and characteristics of included studies

The initial screening process resulted in 95 articles, which were further reviewed for data relevance and usability. After application of the inclusion criteria, 43 studies were excluded for the following reasons: use of the endoscope as an adjunct; lack of clear specification of surgical approach used; insufficient reporting of remission criteria, perioperative or long-term outcomes of TSR; overlapping data from the same institution and reporting of data only from patients who achieved initial remission. For the final quantitative analysis, 52 case series, comprising a total of 4,375 patients, were included. Of these series, 36 were microsurgical [12, 2257] and 13 were endoscopic, [11, 1318, 5863], comprising 3,144 and 940 patients, respectively (Figure 1). Three studies compared microsurgical and endoscopic approaches, comprising 111 and 180 patients, respectively.[12, 64, 65] The mean follow-up duration was 61.3 months (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Flow chart demonstrating the literature review process and selection of case series.

Table 1:

Summary of surgical outcomes for microsurgical and endoscopic case series.

Microsurgical Case Series
Author Year Patients, n Initial Remission, n Patients
with f/u, n
f/u, mo Relapse,
n
Remission
at last f/u, n
Remission Criteria

Fathalla H et al 2015 23 8 23 56.6 0 - 2010
Sarkar S et al 2014 47 17 47 22.38 0 - 2010
Nishioka H et al 2014 150 127 150 22 0 149 2010
Sun H et al 2014 59 26 59 13.4 0 31 2010
Starke RM et al 2013 41 28 41 18.4 0 28 2010
Li ZQ et al 2012 52 16 49 3 0 16 2000
Krzentowaka-Korek A et al 2011 85 32 - - 0 - 2000
Shen M et al 2010 39 7 39 - 0 8 2000
Abassioun K et al 2006 151 101 108 - 2 99 Random GH ≤ 10 ng/mL
Ertruk E et al 2005 30 10 30 42 0 - Basal or OGTT GH ≤ 2 ng/mL
Nomikos P et al 2005 506 290 506 146 2 288 2000
Kurosaki M et al 2003 22 13 22 - 0 13 Normalized IGF-1, OGTT GH < 1 ng/mL, basal GH < 2.5 ng/mL
Beauregard C et al 2003 103 56 95 - 4 57 2000
De P et al 2003 90 57 90 130.8 0 57 2000
Krieger MD et al 2003 205 116 181 60 1 116 Normalized IGF-1, basal GH < 2 ng/mL
Kreutzer J et al 2001 57 40 57 37.7 1 41 2000
Biermasz NR et al 2000 59 36 59 192 5 58 2000
Absoch A et al 1998 254 193 172 - 9 150 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL
Freda PU et al 1998 115 70 99 64.8 6 82 Normalized IGF-1 or basal/suppressed GH of ≤ 2 ng/mL
Yamada S et al 1997 44 25 39 81.6 0 34 Normalized IGF-1, basal GH ≤ 3 ng/mL, OGTT GH ≤ 1ng/mL, TRH/ GnRH GH < 10ng/mL
Sheaves R et al 1996 100 42 32 45.6 1 31 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL
Osman IA et al 1994 79 32 66 85.5 - 35 Basal GH ≤ 5 mU/L and OGTT GH ≤ 2 mU/L
Tindall GT et al 1993 103 85 88 102 0 85 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL, SM-C < 2.2 U/mL
Buchfelder M et al 1991 61 43 61 72 6 39 Basal GH ≤ 5ng/mL and OGTT GH ≤ 2 ng/mL
Losa M et al 1989 29 16 25 - 0 12 OGTT GH ≤ 1 ng/mL and normalized SM-C
Fahlbusch R et al 1988 42 24 - - - - Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL
van’t Verlaat J. et al 1988 25 14 25 42 0 14 Basal GH ≤ 5 mU/L; OGTT GH ≤ 4 mU/L; disappearance of TRH responsiveness if present pre-op
Ross DA et al 1988 214 117 174 76 5 131 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL
Arafah BM et al 1987 43 21 43 - 0 21 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL and normal GH dynamics
Karashima T et al 1986 44 15 - - - - Fasting GH ≤ 5 ng/mL and no response to TRH, LHRH, and/or bromocriptine
Roelfesma F et al 1985 60 37 60 39.6 - 48 Basal GH ≤ 5 mU/L
Serri O et al 1985 25 21 25 82.8 3 18 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL and OGTT GH ≤ 2.5 ng/mL
Grisoli F et al 1985 100 60 100 - 6 56 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL
Bynke O et al 1983 14 10 14 27 1 11 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL
Arafah BU et al 1980 25 11 25 - 0 11 Basal GH < 5ng/mL and normal GH dynamics
Tucker HS et al 1980 32 24 32 48 0 24 Basal GH ≤ 5 ng/mL
Laws ER Jr et al 1979 82 34 80 19 1 50 Basal GH ≤ 10 ng/mL
Leavens ME et al 1977 16 10 16 24 0 12 Basal HGH ≤ 10 ng/mL and normal HGH levels after TRH stimulation
Giovanelli MA et al 1976 29 10 29 - 0 17 Basal GH ≤ 10 ng/mL

Total 3255 1894 2761 59.8 53 1842
Endoscopic Case series

Netuka D et al 2016 105 64 105 35 1 - 2010
Halioglu O et al 2016 103 53 103 38 30 77 2000
Fathalla H et al 2015 42 19 42 56.6 0 - 2010
Sarkar S et al 2014 66 19 66 22.4 0 - 2010
Yildirum A et al 2014 56 37 56 18 0 53 2010
Paluzzi A et al 2014 49 25 49 37.3 0 34 2010
Zhou T et al 2014 133 88 114 - 0 107 2000
Hazer DB et al 2013 214 126 214 33.16 0 134 2010
Starke RM et al 2013 72 51 72 18.4 0 51 2010
van Bunderen CC 2013 30 9 28 13.2 1 - 2000
Wang YY et al 2012 43 29 41 34 0 29 2010
Dusek T et al 2011 49 29 49 57.12 0 36 2000
Wagenmakers MA et al 2011 40 20 40 56 2 19 IGF-1 normal for age and sex, OGTT GH < 2 mU/l
Gondim JA et al 2010 67 50 67 24 0 54 2000
Hofstetter CP et al 2010 24 9 24 23.2 0 11 2010
Campbell PG et al 2010 27 15 26 24.5 0 15 IGF-1 normal for age/sex, OGTT GH < 1ng/mL, random GH < 2.5 ng/mL

Total   1120 643 1096 62.7 34 620

Abbreviations: GH = growth hormone; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1; GnRH = gondatropin releasing hormone; SM-C = somatomedin C, TRH = thyrotropin releasing hormone, LHRH = lutenizing hormone releasing hormone, n = number, mo = month, f/u = follow up.

Clinical Outcomes

Of the 3,255 patients who underwent microscopic TSR, initial endocrine remission was achieved in 1,894 (58.2%). Follow-up data was available for 2,761 patients, with a mean follow-up interval of 59.8 months. Relapse during the follow-up period occurred in 53 of 1,608 patients (3.3%). At last follow-up, endocrine remission was achieved in 1,842 of 2,661 patients (69.2%). Of the 1,120 patients included in the endoscopic series, initial remission was achieved in 643 (57.4%). Follow-up information was available for 1,096 patients, with a mean follow-up interval of 62.7 months. Relapse occurred in 34 of 546 patients (6.2%), and at last follow-up, remission was achieved in in 620 of 883 patients (70.2%).

Of the microsurgical series that stratified remission and relapse data by tumor size (Table 2), initial remission was achieved in 326 of 420 microadenomas (77.6%) and in 453 of 970 macroadenomas (46.7%). There were no reported relapses in the microadenoma group. However, 10 of 160 macroadenoma patients (1.9%) relapsed. Endocrine remission at last follow-up (Figure 2) was observed in 173 of 225 microadenomas (76.9%) and in 164 of 408 macroadenomas (40.2%).

Table 2:

Summary of microsurgical and endoscopic case series, comparing surgical outcomes for macroadenoma and microadenoma.

Microsurgery-Microadenoma Microsurgery-Macroadenoma

Author Year Patients, n Initial
Remission,
n
Patients
with f/u,
n
f/u,
mo
Relapse,
n
Remission
at last f/u, n
Patients,
n
Initial
Remission,
n
Patients
with f/u,
n
f/u,
mo
Relapse,
n
Remission
at last f/u, n

Starke RM et al 2013 10 8 10 18.4 0 8 31 20 31 18.4 0 20
Krzentowaka-Korek A et al 2011 19 17 - - 0 - 52 16 49 3 0 16
Li ZQ et al 2012 0 - - - - - 66 15 - - - -
Ertruk E et al 2005 11 7 11 42 0 - 39 7 39 - - 8
Shen M et al 2010 0 - - - - - 19 3 19 42 0 -
Nomikos P et al 2005 142 107 142 146 - - 354 182 354 146 - -
Beauregard C et al 2003 22 18 22 - - - 52 31 52 - - -
De P et al 2003 29 23 29 130.8 0 23 61 34 61 130.8 0 34
Krieger MD et al 2003 127 99 - 60 0 100 54 17 - 60 1 16
Biermasz NR et al 2000 9 - 9 192 - 6 50 - 50 192 - 30
Freda PU et al 1998 25 22 - 64.8 0 23 90 48 - 64.8 6 59
Fahlbusch R et al 1988 4 3 - - - - 38 21 - - - -
van’t Verlaat J. et al 1988 8 5 8 42 0 5 17 9 17 42 0 9
Karashima T et al 1986 6 3 - - - - 38 12 - - - -
Roelfesma F et al 1985 9 6 9 39.6 - - 42 25 42 39.6 - -
Serri O et al 1985 8 8 8 82.8 0 8 17 13 17 82.8 3 10

Total 429 326 248 81.8 0 173 1020 453 731 74.7 10 164
Endoscopy-Microadenoma Endoscopy-Macroadenoma

Netuka D et al 2016 16 12 16 35 0 13 89 - - - - -
Yildirum A et al 2014 5 4 5 18 0 - 51 33 51 18 0 -
Palluzzi A et al 2014 5 4 5 37.3 0 5 44 21 44 37.3 0 29
Hazer DB et al 2013 51 - 51 33.16 0 32 163 - 163 33.16 0 102
Starke RM et al 2013 13 12 13 18.4 0 12 59 39 59 18.4 0 39
Wang YY et al 2012 13 10 13 34 0 10 30 19 30 34 0 19
Dusek T et al 2011 13 10 13 57.12 0 - 36 19 36 57.12 0 -
Wagenmakers MA et al 2011 0 - - - - - 40 20 40 56 2 19
Gondim JA et al 2010 14 12 14 24 0 - 53 38 53 24 0 -
Campbell PG et al 2010 4 3 4 24.5 0 3 22 12 22 24.5 0 12

Total 134 67 134 31.3 0 75 587 201 498 33.6 2 220

Abbreviations: n = number; mo = month; f/u = follow-up.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Summary of remission and relapse rates according to surgical approach and tumor size. Abbreviations: f/u = follow-up.

Of the endoscopic series that stratified remission and relapse data by tumor size (Table 2), initial remission was achieved in 67 of 83 microadenomas (82.2%) and in 201 of 335 macroadenomas (60.0%). There were no reported relapses in the microadenoma group. Relapse occurred in 2 of 242 macroadenoma patients (0.6%). Remission at last follow-up (Figure 2) was observed in 75 of 102 microadenomas (73.5%) and in 220 of 358 macroadenomas (61.5%).

Surgical Complications

For studies that reported intraoperative complications, CSF leak was the most common complication, which occurred in 39 of 1, 373 (2.8%) and 86 of 603 (17.4%) patients who underwent microscopic and endoscopic TSR, respectively (Table 3). The rates of persistent postoperative CSF leak were comparable between the groups, occurring in 3.0% and 2.3% of patients in microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Hypopituitarism and transient DI were the most frequently reported postoperative complications. Hypopituitarism, defined as one or more new endocrine abnormalities, was observed in 191 of 2,542 (6.7%) and 52 of 817 (6.4%) patients in the microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Transient DI was observed in 208 of 2, 492 (9.0%) and in 69 of 889 (7.8%) patients in the microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Permanent DI occurred infrequently, and was reported in 2.0% of microsurgical and 1.7% of endoscopic TSR patients, respectively.

Table 3:

Summary table of intra-operative and post-operative complications between the microsurgical and endoscopic groups.

Microsurgical Case Series

Intra-operative complications (n) Post-operative complications (n)

Author Year Patients CSF Leak Vascular
injury
Visual
deficit
CSF
Leak
Hypopituitarism Pan-
hypopituitarism
Meningitis Epistaxis Transient
DI
Permanent
DI

Fathalla H et al 2015 23 - - - 2 1 - - 1 8 4
Sarkar S et al 2014 14 17 - 0 2 18 10 2 - 2 -
Nishioka H et al 2014 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sun H et al 2014 59 - - - 0 - - - - 6 2
Starke RM et al 2013 41 12 0 0 1 - 0 0 1 2 0
Li ZQ et al 2012 52 - 0 2 - 0 0 0 0 3 1
Krzentowaka-Korek A et al 2011 85 0 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 -
Shen M et al 2010 39 - - - - - - - - - -
Abassioun K et al 2006 151 0 0 0 12 28 0 1 0 17 2
Ertruk E et al 2005 30 - 0 0 - 3 - - 0 - -
Nomikos P et al 2005 506 - 1 0 - 15 0 - 0 0 6
Kurosaki M et al 2003 22 - - - - - - - - - 0
Beauregard C et al 2003 103 - 1 - - 3 - - - - -
De P et al 2003 90 - - 0 - 22 39 3 0 16 14
Krieger MD et al 2003 205 - - - - - - - - - -
Kreutzer J et al 2001 57 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 - 2 1
Biermasz NR et al 2000 59 - - - - 3 - - - - -
Absoch A et al 1998 254 0 0 0 5 4 0 6 0 54 4
Freda PU et al 1998 115 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Yamada S et al 1997 44 - 0 0 - 3 1 0 0 21 0
Sheaves R et al 1996 100 - 1 0 - 21 0 8 0 29 8
Osman IA et al 1994 79 10 - 0 0 10 0 0 0 3 0
Tindall GT et al 1993 103 - 0 1 - 3 3 0 0 7 1
Buchfelder M et al 1991 61 - - - - - - - - - -
Losa M et al 1989 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9 0
Fahlbusch R et al 1988 42 - - - - - - - - - -
van’t Verlaat J. et al 1988 25 0 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 2
Ross DA et al 1988 214 0 5 0 11 10 4 4 1 1 0
Arafah BM et al 1987 43 0 0 0 0 - - - - 10 1
Karashima T et al 1986 44 - - - - - - - - - -
Roelfesma F et al 1985 60 - - 2 - 17 2 1 0 2 0
Serri O et al 1985 25 - - - - - - - - - -
Grisoli F et al 1985 100 - 2 - - 0 0 - - - -
Bynke O et al 1983 14 0 0 0 1 - - 0 0 0 0
Arafah BU et al 1980 25 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 1
Tucker HS et al 1980 32 0 0 0 1 - 4 1 0 10 1
Laws ER Jr et al 1979 82 - 0 0 - 3 10 0 0 0 0
Leavens ME et al 1977 16 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 7 0
Giovanelli MA et al 1976 29 0 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 0

Total, n/n (%) 3222 39/1373 (2.8) 13/2400
(0.5)
6/2440
(0.2)
44/ 1455
(3.0)
191/2542
(6.7)
76/2368
(3.2)
27/1861
(1.4)
4/2349
(0.1)
208/2492
(9.0)
48/2375
(2.0)

Endoscopic Series

Netuka D et al 2016 105 - - - 2 10 - - - 1 -
Fathalla H et al 2015 42 - - - 2 1 - `- - 8 4
Sarkar S et al 2014 66 22 - 0 1 12 14 - 1 6 -
Yildirum A et al 2014 56 - 1 - 2 1 3 0 0 2 1
Zhou T et al 2014 133 19 0 1 0 5 3 1 2 12 0
Hazer DB et al 2013 214 29 0 0 5 8 1 1 1 0 2
Starke RM et al 2013 72 23 1 0 2 - - 1 4 6 3
van Bunderen CC 2013 30 - - - - - - - - - -
Wang YY et al 2012 43 - 0 0 - 5 0 1 0 14 2
Dusek T et al 2011 49 - 1 0 - - - 1 0 - -
Wagenmakers MA et al 2011 40 - 0 0 3 5 0 0 4 15 0
Gondim JA et al 2010 67 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 3 0
Hofstetter CP et al 2010 24 12 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
Campbell PG et al 2010 27 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

Total, n/n (%) 968 86/ 603
(17.4)
3/725
(0.4)
2/ 735
(0.2)
20/ 855
(2.3)
52/ 817
(6.4)
23/ 670
(3.4)
5/ 725
(0.7)
16/791
(2.0)
69/ 889
(7.8)
12/ 718 (1.7)

Total n/n = complication / total patients. Abbreviations: Intra-op = intra-operative; post-op = post-operative; CSF = cerebral spinal fluid; DI = diabetes insipidus; n = number.

Adjuvant Therapy

For patients in whom initial remission was not achieved with microscopic TSR (Table 3), 209 of 780 (36.8%) patients received medical therapy, 68 of 867 (7.8%) patients underwent repeat TSR, 263 of 809 (32.5%) patients underwent radiotherapy, and 35 of 867 (4.0%) patients underwent SRS. For patients in whom initial remission was not achieved with endoscopic TSR, 221 of 625 (35.4%) patients received medical therapy, 68 of 611 (11.1%) patients underwent repeat TSR, 26 of 331 (7.9%) patients underwent radiotherapy, and 58 of 492 (11.8%) patients underwent SRS.

Consensus Remission Criteria

Of the microsurgical case series that used the 2000 or 2010 consensus remission criteria, 740 of 1311 (56.4%) patients achieved initial endocrine remission (Figure 3). Relapse occurred in 12 of 841 (1.4%) patients, and long-term remission was achieved in 733 of 1,117 (65.6%) patients. Of the endoscopic case series that used the 2000 or 2010 remission criteria, 608 of 1,053 (57.7%) patients achieved initial remission. Relapse occurred in 32 of 512 (0.6%) patients, and long-term remission was achieved in 576 of 789 (73.0%) patients.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Summary of remission and relapse rates according to surgical approach and tumor size. Abbreviations: f/u = follow-up.

Of the microsurgical series which stratified outcomes by tumor size and using the 2000 or 2010 criteria (Figure 3), 173 of 222 microadenomas (77.9%) and in 301 of 636 macroadenomas (47.4%) achieved initial remission. No relapses were observed in either group. Long-term remission was reported in 37 of 48 microadenomas (77.1%) and in 100 of 191 macroadenomas (52.4%). Of the endoscopic series which stratified outcomes by tumor size and using the 2000 or 2010 criteria, initial remission was achieved in 64 of 79 microadenomas (81.0%) and in 210 of 273 macroadenomas (76.9%). No relapses occurred in either group. Long-term remission was reported in 40 of 47 microadenomas (85.1%) and in 87 of 133 macroadenomas (65.4%).

Discussion

Systemic elevation of GH and IGF-1 levels in patients with acromegaly is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. With the advent of novel therapies, the potential to increase life expectancy and achieve therapeutic remission in patients with a wide spectrum of clinical and radiographic disease burden has grown.[10] TSR, which can rapidly normalize hormone levels and provide relief from mass effect, is currently favored over medical therapy. [7, 12, 66, 67] The earliest transsphenoidal approaches to the pituitary made use of the microscope to effectively visualize the operative field. [68, 69] The endoscopic-assisted transsphenoidal approach, introduced in 1963 by Guiot et al, refers to the use of the endoscope as an adjunct to the microscopic removal of a tumor. [70] Although this approach was succeeded, in the 1990’s, by the pure endoscopic transsphenoidal approach, a recent series has highlighted the utility of the endoscopic-assisted technique for its ability to achieve additional adenoma removal following maximal microscopic resection of large and invasive tumors. [71, 72]

Further refinement of the pure endoscopic approach has led to its popularization, in some institutions, over the microscopic approach. However, optimal treatment protocols for patients with acromegaly remain unclear, due to a lack of long-term follow-up and comparison of remission outcomes between surgical modalities, in recent series. [12] Previous reports of endoscopic TSR for acromegaly have been limited by small cohort sizes, short durations of clinical and/or radiographic follow-up, and lack of a uniform definition of remission.[12]

Recent series have advocated for surgical decisions regarding approach to be based upon tumor size and position, preferring microscopic TSR for small, and endoscopic for large tumors.[73] The relative advantages afforded by the endoscope are that it offers a wider, more panoramic view, enabling better visualization and control of the lateral aspects of the tumor and operative field, including views into the suprasellar compartment and lateral aspect of cavernous sinus. However, the disadvantages of the endoscope are that it does not offer three-dimensional stereotactic images like those obtained with the operative microscope, and its surgical instruments have limited maneuverability. [12] The recent development and uptake of three-dimensional endoscopes into clinical practice may, in the imminent future, offset these current disadvantages [74]. Intra-operative MRI, which has been used as an adjunct to both microsurgical and endoscopic techniques, provides an early objective assessment of the radicality of tumor resection [75]. With its use, an improvement in surgical outcomes and consequent remission rates has been reported in two microsurgical and two endoscopic case series [62, 7678]. Greater accessibility to this technology may, therefore, lead to increased application in the resection of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas.

This review found overall initial and long-term remission rates to be comparable between the endoscopic and microscopic approaches. Better outcomes were achieved for microadenomas, irrespective of surgical modality. Highlighting the relevance of tumor size to the appropriateness of surgical approach, use of the endoscopic technique may achieve higher initial and long-term remission rates in patients with macroadenomas, providing emphasis to the potential benefit of this approach for large tumors. Our findings are consistent with recent analyses suggesting that remission rates achieved by TSR are generally higher for GH-secreting microadenomas, but that endoscopic TSR may achieve improved rates of complete tumor resection and biochemical remission for macroadenomas. [7981]

Adjuvant therapy, which includes hormone-suppressant medication, repeat surgery, SRS or radiotherapy, plays an important role in the long-term management of patients who do not attain immediate remission following TSR. [82, 83] Although the rates of adjuvant medical therapy were comparable between the two groups, radiotherapy was more frequently employed following microsurgical (32.5%) than endoscopic (7.9%) TSR. This may be due to the fact that the more recently published case series reporting the endoscopic approach correspond with an increasing popularization of adjuvant SRS over radiotherapy. [84] Although there was a high rate of intra-operative CSF leak observed in the endoscopic group (17.4%), rates of persistent CSF leak and postoperative endocrine complications were comparable between the two groups.

Based on updated 2010 consensus guidelines for remission from acromegaly, high rates of biochemical remission, ranging from 77–87% in patients with microadenomas and 63–66% in patients with macroadenomas, have been achieved with the use of endoscopic TSR. [12, 14] That the majority of patients do achieve remission holds promise, relative to prior series reporting a wider variety of outcomes. Under the less strict biochemical criteria of the 2000 consensus report, remission rates ranged from 42%–72% with microsurgery and 56%–83% with endoscopy. [1618, 23, 26, 28, 67, 8598] Although the results from this review are largely consistent with the most recent reports, we have observed higher long-term remission rates for macroadenoma resection with the use of the endoscopic technique.

Different surgical approaches offer unique balances of advantages and limitations, but none are immune to the challenges of complete resection of large and laterally localized tumors. For any surgical approach, the utility of the Knosp grade as a preoperative predictor of outcome has been emphasized.[12, 25, 26, 66, 99102] It is well established that Knosp grade 3 or 4 tumors are associated with significantly lower rates of complete resection and biochemical remission.[7, 12, 26, 99] In some series, the Knosp grade has been shown to be even more predictive of postoperative remission than size for acromegaly patients.[13, 17, 18, 88, 103105] The potential for the endoscopic technique to achieve a better visualization of the operative field and a more complete resection, in cases of cavernous sinus invasion, should, therefore, be further investigated. It should also be noted that patients treated in higher volume centers have better overall outcomes, lending credence to the benefit of surgeon experience, regardless of surgical approach.[12, 14, 28, 106, 107]

The present study’s strengths include the large number of patients and longitudinal nature of follow-up of the included case series. However, there are several important limitations of the study which should be noted. The comparison of results between endoscopic and microsurgical series was based on a summation of data from a heterogeneous cohort of patients, with differences in the number of cases and duration of follow-up between each group. Definitions for the diagnosis of acromegaly and biochemical remission were not consistent between studies. Older studies may be limited by early imaging techniques. Furthermore, operator expertise in either technique can dramatically influence patient outcomes and studies intending to compare the two approaches may have strong inherent biases. Hence, a true objective comparison may never be achieved, and the limited number of studies directly comparing approaches has precluded a meta-analysis from being performed.

Conclusions

Both endoscopic and microsurgical approaches for TSR provide viable treatment options for patients with acromegaly, yielding similarly high rates of endocrine remission under the most current consensus criteria without observed differences in postoperative complications. Higher rates of remission were achieved for microadenomas, irrespective of surgical modality. The endoscopic approach may offer a benefit in the resection of macroadenomas, where the greater field of view affords a greater potential for complete extirpation. However, surgeon expertise and familiarity with each of the techniques are likely to concurrently affect outcomes. Due to limitations in the literature, a direct comparison between the approaches cannot be carried out, and therefore, further studies directly comparing endoscopic and microsurgical approaches are warranted, in order to further clarify their respective advantages in the surgical management of acromegaly.

Table 4:

Summary table comparing mode and rate of adjuvant therapy between microsurgical and endoscopic groups.

Microsurgical Series
Author Year Patients
requiring
medical
therapy, n/n
Patients
requiring
repeat
surgery, n/n
Patients
requiring
radiotherapy,
n/n
Patients requiring
radiosurgery, n/n

Nishioka H et al 2014 15/150 0/150 4/150 0/150
Starke RM et al 2013 7/13 0/13 2/13 6/13
Krzentowaka-Korek A et al 2011 53/53 0/53 0/53 0/53
Shen M et al 2010 0/32 0/32 0/32 11/32
Abassioun K et al 2006 0/7 0/7 - 0/7
Ertruk E et al 2005 13/20 6/20 8/20 3/20
Kurosaki M et al 2003 8/9 0/9 0/9 3/9
Beauregard C et al 2003 5/47 10/47 12/47 0/47
De P et al 2003 33/33 0/33 31/33 0/33
Kreutzer J et al 2001 13/17 1/17 0/17 10/17
Biermasz NR et al 2000 6/23 0/23 19/23 0/23
Absoch A et al 1998 7/61 3/61 24/61 0/61
Freda PU et al 1998 15/45 12/45 30/45 2/45
Yamada S et al 1997 1/19 0/19 0/19 0/19
Sheaves R et al 1996 0/58 0/58 0/58 0/58
Osman IA et al 1994 0/47 9/47 - 0/47
Tindall GT et al 1993 13/18 0/18 12/18 0/18
Losa M et al 1989 9/9 3/9 2/9 0/9
van’t Verlaat J. et al 1988 11/11 0/11 11/11 0/11
Ross DA et al 1988 - 7/87 38/87 0/87
Roelfesma F et al 1985 0/23 2/23 19/23 0/23
Bynke O et al 1983 0/4 2/4 - 0/4
Tucker HS et al 1980 0/8 3/8 5/8 0/8
Laws ER Jr et al 1979 0/48 3/48 27/48 0/48
Leavens ME et al 1977 0/6 4/6 2/6 0/6
Giovanelli MA et al 1976 0/19 3/19 17/19 0/19

Total, n/n (%) 209/780
(26.8 %)
68/867
(7.8 %)
263/809
(32.5 %)
35/867
(4.0 %)
Endoscopic Series

Netuka D et al 2016 24/105 7/105 - 32/105
Halioglu O et al 2016 70/103 9/103 9/103 0/103
Yildirum A et al 2014 19/56 16/56 - 3/56
Zhou T et al 2014 23/133 4/133 - -
Hazer DB et al 2013 0/88 22/88 0/88 0/88
Starke RM et al 2013 11/21 0/21 6/21 9/21
van Bunderen CC 2013 16/21 4/21 1/21 0/21
Wang YY et al 2012 12/14 - 4/14 0/14
Dusek T et al 2011 14/20 0/20 0/20 5/20
Wagenmakers MA et al 2011 14/20 2/20 6/20 2/20
Gondim JA et al 2010 0/17 4/17 0/17 0/17
Hofstetter CP et al 2010 9/15 0/15 0/15 5/15
Campbell PG et al 2010 9/12 0/12 0/12 2/12

Total, n/n (%) 221/625(35.4%) 68/611(11.1%) 26/331 (7.9 %) 58/492(11.8 %)

Abbreviations: n = number.

Total n/n = patients receiving adjuvant therapy after surgery / patients not in remission after initial surgery

Acknowledgments

Funding: No funding was received for this research.

Abbreviations:

TSR

transsphenoidal resection

GH

growth hormone

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

CSF

cerebral spinal fluid

DI

diabetes insipidus

SRS

stereotactic radiosurgery

Footnotes

Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent: For this type of study formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest: All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Melmed S (2009) Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment. J Clin Invest 119:3189–3202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Melmed S, Colao A, Barkan A, Molitch M, Grossman AB, Kleinberg D, Clemmons D, Chanson P, Laws E, Schlechte J, Vance ML, Ho K, Giustina A, Acromegaly Consensus G (2009) Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:1509–1517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Katznelson L (2010) Approach to the patient with persistent acromegaly after pituitary surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:4114–4123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McLanaham CS, Christy JH, Tindall GT (1978) Anterior pituitary function before and after trans-sphenoidal microsurgical resection of pituitary tumors. Neurosurgery 3:142–145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ciric I, Ragin A, Baumgartner C, Pierce D (1997) Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 40:225–236; discussion 236–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vasilev V, Daly A, Zacharieva S, Beckers A (2010) Management of acromegaly. F1000 Med Rep 2:54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Buchfelder M (1992) Surgical management of acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 21:669–692 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guinto G, Abdo M, Zepeda E, Arechiga N, Mercado M (2012) Acromegaly: role of surgery in the therapeutic armamentarium. Int J Endocrinol 2012:306094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Los Reyes KM, Gross BA, Frerichs KU, Dunn IF, Lin N, Rincon-Torroella J, Annino DJ, Laws ER (2015) Incidence, risk factors and management of severe post-transsphenoidal epistaxis. J Clin Neurosci 22:116–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dekkers OM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Vandenbroucke JP (2008) Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:61–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hazer DB, Isik S, Berker D, Guler S, Gurlek A, Yucel T, Berker M (2013) Treatment of acromegaly by endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: surgical experience in 214 cases and cure rates according to current consensus criteria. J Neurosurg 119:1467–1477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Starke RM, Raper DM, Payne SC, Vance ML, Oldfield EH, Jane JA Jr. (2013) Endoscopic vs microsurgical transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: outcomes in a concurrent series of patients using modern criteria for remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3190–3198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.van Bunderen CC, van Varsseveld NC, Baayen JC, van Furth WR, Aliaga ES, Hazewinkel MJ, Majoie CB, Freling NJ, Lips P, Fliers E, Bisschop PH, Drent ML (2013) Predictors of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery outcome in acromegaly: patient and tumor characteristics evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Pituitary 16:158–167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang YY, Higham C, Kearney T, Davis JR, Trainer P, Gnanalingham KK (2012) Acromegaly surgery in Manchester revisited--the impact of reducing surgeon numbers and the 2010 consensus guidelines for disease remission. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 76:399–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wagenmakers MA, Netea-Maier RT, van Lindert EJ, Pieters GF, Grotenhuis AJ, Hermus AR (2011) Results of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in 40 patients with a growth hormone-secreting macroadenoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:1391–1399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gondim JA, Almeida JP, de Albuquerque LA, Gomes E, Schops M, Ferraz T (2010) Pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for treatment of acromegaly: results of 67 cases treated in a pituitary center. Neurosurg Focus 29:E7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hofstetter CP, Mannaa RH, Mubita L, Anand VK, Kennedy JW, Dehdashti AR, Schwartz TH (2010) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Focus 29:E6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Campbell PG, Kenning E, Andrews DW, Yadla S, Rosen M, Evans JJ (2010) Outcomes after a purely endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Focus 29:E5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jho HD (2001) Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurooncol 54:187–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jho HD, Carrau RL (1997) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg 87:44–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jho HD, Carrau RL, Ko Y, Daly MA (1997) Endoscopic pituitary surgery: an early experience. Surg Neurol 47:213–222; discussion 222–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shen M, Shou X, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Wu J, Mao Y, Li S, Zhao Y (2010) Effect of presurgical long-acting octreotide treatment in acromegaly patients with invasive pituitary macroadenomas: a prospective randomized study. Endocr J 57:1035–1044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nomikos P, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R (2005) The outcome of surgery in 668 patients with acromegaly using current criteria of biochemical ‘cure’. Eur J Endocrinol 152:379–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kurosaki M, Luedecke DK, Abe T (2003) Effectiveness of secondary transnasal surgery in GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas. Endocr J 50:635–642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Beauregard C, Truong U, Hardy J, Serri O (2003) Long-term outcome and mortality after transsphenoidal adenomectomy for acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58:86–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.De P, Rees DA, Davies N, John R, Neal J, Mills RG, Vafidis J, Davies JS, Scanlon MF (2003) Transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly in wales: results based on stringent criteria of remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3567–3572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krieger MD, Couldwell WT, Weiss MH (2003) Assessment of long-term remission of acromegaly following surgery. J Neurosurg 98:719–724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kreutzer J, Vance ML, Lopes MB, Laws ER Jr. (2001) Surgical management of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas: an outcome study using modern remission criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4072–4077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Biermasz NR, van Dulken H, Roelfsema F (2000) Ten-year follow-up results of transsphenoidal microsurgery in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4596–4602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Freda PU, Wardlaw SL, Post KD (1998) Long-term endocrinological follow-up evaluation in 115 patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. J Neurosurg 89:353–358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamada S, Aiba T, Takada K, Ozawa Y, Shimizu T, Sawano S, Shishiba Y, Sano T (1996) Retrospective analysis of long-term surgical results in acromegaly: preoperative and postoperative factors predicting outcome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45:291–298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sheaves R, Jenkins P, Blackburn P, Huneidi AH, Afshar F, Medbak S, Grossman AB, Besser GM, Wass JA (1996) Outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly using strict criteria for surgical cure. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45:407–413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Osman IA, James RA, Chatterjee S, Mathias D, Kendall-Taylor P (1994) Factors determining the long-term outcome of surgery for acromegaly. QJM 87:617–623 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tindall GT, Oyesiku NM, Watts NB, Clark RV, Christy JH, Adams DA (1993) Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in acromegaly: outcome analysis and determinants of failure. J Neurosurg 78:205–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Buchfelder M, Brockmeier S, Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Pichl J, Manzl M (1991) Recurrence following transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. Horm Res 35:113–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Losa M, Oeckler R, Schopohl J, Muller OA, Alba-Lopez J, von Werder K (1989) Evaluation of selective transsphenoidal adenomectomy by endocrinological testing and somatomedin-C measurement in acromegaly. J Neurosurg 70:561–567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M (1988) Transsphenoidal surgery of parasellar pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 92:93–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Arafah BM, Rosenzweig JL, Fenstermaker R, Salazar R, McBride CE, Selman W (1987) Value of growth hormone dynamics and somatomedin C (insulin-like growth factor I) levels in predicting the long-term benefit after transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. J Lab Clin Med 109:346–354 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Karashima T, Kato K, Nawata H, Ikuyama S, Ibayashi H, Nakagaki H, Kitamura K (1986) Postoperative plasma GH levels and restoration of GH dynamics in acromegalic patients surgically treated by the transsphenoidal approach. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 25:157–163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Serri O, Somma M, Comtois R, Rasio E, Beauregard H, Jilwan N, Hardy J (1985) Acromegaly: biochemical assessment of cure after long term follow-up of transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 61:1185–1189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Grisoli F, Leclercq T, Jaquet P, Guibout M, Winteler JP, Hassoun J, Vincentelli F (1985) Transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly--long-term results in 100 patients. Surg Neurol 23:513–519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bynke O, Karlberg BE, Kagedal B, Nilsson OR (1983) Early post-operative growth hormone levels predict the result of transsphenoidal tumour removal in acromegaly. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 103:158–162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tucker HS, Grubb SR, Wigand JP, Watlington CO, Blackard WG, Becker DP (1980) The treatment of acromegaly by transsphenoidal surgery. Arch Intern Med 140:795–802 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Laws ER Jr., Piepgras DG, Randall RV, Abboud CF (1979) Neurosurgical management of acromegaly. Results in 82 patients treated between 1972 and 1977. J Neurosurg 50:454–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Leavens ME, Samaan NA, Jesse RH Jr., Byers RM (1977) Clinical and endocrinological evaluation of 16 acromegalic patients treated by transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 47:853–860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Giovanelli MA, Motti ED, Paracchi A, Beck-Peccoz P, Ambrosi B, Faglia G (1976) Treatment of acromegaly by transsphenoidal microsurgery. J Neurosurg 44:677–686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li ZQ, Quan Z, Tian HL, Cheng M (2012) Preoperative lanreotide treatment improves outcome in patients with acromegaly resulting from invasive pituitary macroadenoma. J Int Med Res 40:517–524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Krzentowska-Korek A, Golkowski F, Baldys-Waligorska A, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A (2011) Efficacy and complications of neurosurgical treatment of acromegaly. Pituitary 14:157–162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abbassioun K, Amirjamshidi M, Mehrazin A, Khalatbary I, Keynama M, Bokai H, Abdollahi M (2006) A prospective analysis of 151 cases of patients with acromegaly operated by one neurosurgeon: a follow-up of more than 23 years. Surg Neurol 66:26–31; discussion 31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Erturk E, Tuncel E, Kiyici S, Ersoy C, Duran C, Imamoglu S (2005) Outcome of surgery for acromegaly performed by different surgeons: importance of surgical experience. Pituitary 8:93–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Abosch A, Tyrrell JB, Lamborn KR, Hannegan LT, Applebury CB, Wilson CB (1998) Transsphenoidal microsurgery for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: initial outcome and long-term results. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3411–3418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.van’t Verlaat JW, Nortier JW, Hendriks MJ, Bosma NJ, Graamans K, Lubsen H, Vasen HF, Thijssen JH, Croughs RJ (1988) Transsphenoidal microsurgery as primary treatment in 25 acromegalic patients: results and follow-up. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 117:154–158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ross DA, Wilson CB (1988) Results of transsphenoidal microsurgery for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma in a series of 214 patients. J Neurosurg 68:854–867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Roelfsema F, van Dulken H, Frolich M (1985) Long-term results of transsphenoidal pituitary microsurgery in 60 acromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 23:555–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Arafah BU, Brodkey JS, Kaufman B, Velasco M, Manni A, Pearson OH (1980) Transsphenoidal microsurgery in the treatment of acromegaly and gigantism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 50:578–585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nishioka H, Fukuhara N, Horiguchi K, Yamada S (2014) Aggressive transsphenoidal resection of tumors invading the cavernous sinus in patients with acromegaly: predictive factors, strategies, and outcomes. J Neurosurg 121:505–510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sun H, Brzana J, Yedinak CG, Gultekin SH, Delashaw JB, Fleseriu M (2014) Factors associated with biochemical remission after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 75:47–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Haliloglu O, Kuruoglu E, Ozkaya HM, Keskin FE, Gunaldi O, Oz B, Gazioglu N, Kadioglu P, Tanriover N (2016) Multidisciplinary Approach for Acromegaly: A Single Tertiary Center’s Experience. World Neurosurg 88:270–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yildirim AE, Sahinoglu M, Divanlioglu D, Alagoz F, Gurcay AG, Daglioglu E, Okay HO, Belen AD (2014) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal treatment for acromegaly: 2010 consensus criteria for remission and predictors of outcomes. Turk Neurosurg 24:906–912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Paluzzi A, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Tonya Stefko S, Challinor S, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA (2014) Endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: a series of 555 patients. Pituitary 17:307–319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhou T, Wang F, Meng X, Ba J, Wei S, Xu B (2014) Outcome of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in combination with somatostatin analogues in patients with growth hormone producing pituitary adenoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 56:405–409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Netuka D, Majovsky M, Masopust V, Belsan T, Marek J, Krsek M, Hana V, Jezkova J, Hana V Jr., Benes V (2016) Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery of Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas. World Neurosurg 91:490–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dusek T, Kastelan D, Melada A, Baretic M, Skoric Polovina T, Perkovic Z, Giljevic Z, Jelcic J, Paladino J, Aganovic I, Korsic M (2011) Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes of patients with acromegaly: single-center experience. J Endocrinol Invest 34:e382–385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fathalla H, Cusimano MD, Di Ieva A, Lee J, Alsharif O, Goguen J, Zhang S, Smyth H (2015) Endoscopic versus microscopic approach for surgical treatment of acromegaly. Neurosurg Rev 38:541–548; discussion 548–549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sarkar S, Rajaratnam S, Chacko G, Chacko AG (2014) Endocrinological outcomes following endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in 113 patients with acromegaly. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 126:190–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Buchfelder M (1997) Evidence supporting surgery as treatment of choice for acromegaly. J Endocrinol 155 Suppl 1:S53–55 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Laws ER (2008) Surgery for acromegaly: evolution of the techniques and outcomes. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 9:67–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jane JA Jr., Han J, Prevedello DM, Jagannathan J, Dumont AS, Laws ER Jr. (2005) Perspectives on endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurg Focus 19:E2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Solari D, Stagno V, Esposito F, de Angelis M (2014) Endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 82:S3–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Guiot J, Rougerie J, Fourestier M, Fournier A, Comoy C, Vulmiere J, Groux R (1963) [Intracranial endoscopic explorations]. Presse Med 71:1225–1228 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Al-Mefty O, Pravdenkova S, Gragnaniello C (2010) A technical note on endonasal combined microscopic endoscopic with free head navigation technique of removal of pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Rev 33:243–248; discussion 248–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McLaughlin N, Eisenberg AA, Cohan P, Chaloner CB, Kelly DF (2013) Value of endoscopy for maximizing tumor removal in endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. J Neurosurg 118:613–620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Oldfield EH (2010) Editorial: Unresolved issues: radiosurgery versus radiation therapy; medical suppression of growth hormone production during radiosurgery; and endoscopic surgery versus microscopic surgery. Neurosurg Focus 29:E16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kari E, Oyesiku NM, Dadashev V, Wise SK (2012) Comparison of traditional 2-dimensional endoscopic pituitary surgery with new 3-dimensional endoscopic technology: intraoperative and early postoperative factors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2:2–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Buchfelder M, Schlaffer SM (2017) The surgical treatment of acromegaly. Pituitary 20:76–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fahlbusch R, Keller B, Ganslandt O, Kreutzer J, Nimsky C (2005) Transsphenoidal surgery in acromegaly investigated by intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Endocrinol 153:239–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bellut D, Hlavica M, Schmid C, Bernays RL (2010) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-assisted transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in patients with acromegaly. Neurosurg Focus 29:E9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tanei T, Nagatani T, Nakahara N, Watanabe T, Nishihata T, Nielsen ML, Takebayashi S, Hirano M, Wakabayashi T (2013) Use of high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for functioning pituitary microadenomas and small adenomas located in the intrasellar region. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 53:501–510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Li A, Liu W, Cao P, Zheng Y, Bu Z, Zhou T (2017) Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery in the Treatment of Pituitary Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 101:236–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Phan K, Xu J, Reddy R, Kalakoti P, Nanda A, Fairhall J (2017) Endoscopic Endonasal versus Microsurgical Transsphenoidal Approach for Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 97:398–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Starnoni D, Daniel RT, Marino L, Pitteloud N, Levivier M, Messerer M (2016) Surgical treatment of acromegaly according to the 2010 remission criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158:2109–2121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ding D, Starke RM, Sheehan JP (2014) Treatment paradigms for pituitary adenomas: defining the roles of radiosurgery and radiation therapy. J Neurooncol 117:445–457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ding D, Yen CP, Starke RM, Lee CC, Sheehan JP (2014) Unyielding progress: recent advances in the treatment of central nervous system neoplasms with radiosurgery and radiation therapy. J Neurooncol 119:513–529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ikeda H, Jokura H, Yoshimoto T (2001) Transsphenoidal surgery and adjuvant gamma knife treatment for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 95:285–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A, de Divitiis E (2002) Surgical complications associated with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 97:293–298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gondim JA, Schops M, de Almeida JP, de Albuquerque LA, Gomes E, Ferraz T, Barroso FA (2010) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: surgical results of 228 pituitary adenomas treated in a pituitary center. Pituitary 13:68–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tabaee A, Anand VK, Barron Y, Hiltzik DH, Brown SM, Kacker A, Mazumdar M, Schwartz TH (2009) Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 111:545–554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yano S, Kawano T, Kudo M, Makino K, Nakamura H, Kai Y, Morioka M, Kuratsu J (2009) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach through the bilateral nostrils for pituitary adenomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 49:1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A, Del Basso De Caro M, Esposito F, Cirillo S, Lombardi G, de Divitiis E (2002) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:193–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F (2008) Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery 62:1006–1015; discussion 1015–1007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Frank G, Pasquini E (2006) Endoscopic endonasal cavernous sinus surgery, with special reference to pituitary adenomas. Front Horm Res 34:64–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kabil MS, Eby JB, Shahinian HK (2005) Fully endoscopic endonasal vs. transseptal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 48:348–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rudnik A, Zawadzki T, Wojtacha M, Bazowski P, Gamrot J, Galuszka-Ignasiak B, Duda I (2005) Endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal treatment of pathology of the sellar region. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 48:101–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Laws ER, Vance ML, Thapar K (2000) Pituitary surgery for the management of acromegaly. Horm Res 53 Suppl 3:71–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Esposito V, Santoro A, Minniti G, Salvati M, Innocenzi G, Lanzetta G, Cantore G (2004) Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for GH-, PRL- and ACTH-secreting pituitary tumours: outcome analysis in a series of 125 patients. Neurol Sci 25:251–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ludecke DK, Abe T (2006) Transsphenoidal microsurgery for newly diagnosed acromegaly: a personal view after more than 1,000 operations. Neuroendocrinology 83:230–239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Minniti G, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Esposito V, Santoro A, Moroni C, Lenzi J, Tamburrano G, Cassone R, Cantore G (2001) Surgical treatment and clinical outcome of GH-secreting adenomas in elderly patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:1205–1211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Trepp R, Stettler C, Zwahlen M, Seiler R, Diem P, Christ ER (2005) Treatment outcomes and mortality of 94 patients with acromegaly. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:243–251; discussion 250–241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Jane JA Jr., Starke RM, Elzoghby MA, Reames DL, Payne SC, Thorner MO, Marshall JC, Laws ER Jr., Vance ML (2011) Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: remission using modern criteria, complications, and predictors of outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2732–2740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Marquez Y, Tuchman A, Zada G (2012) Surgery and radiosurgery for acromegaly: a review of indications, operative techniques, outcomes, and complications. Int J Endocrinol 2012:386401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Dallapiazza R, Bond AE, Grober Y, Louis RG, Payne SC, Oldfield EH, Jane JA Jr. (2014) Retrospective analysis of a concurrent series of microscopic versus endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries for Knosp Grades 0–2 nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas at a single institution. J Neurosurg 121:511–517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Briceno V, Zaidi HA, Doucette JA, Onomichi KB, Alreshidi A, Mekary RA, Smith TR (2017) Efficacy of transsphenoidal surgery in achieving biochemical cure of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas among patients with cavernous sinus invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Res 39:387–398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Giustina A, Barkan A, Casanueva FF, Cavagnini F, Frohman L, Ho K, Veldhuis J, Wass J, Von Werder K, Melmed S (2000) Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:526–529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Giustina A, Chanson P, Bronstein MD, Klibanski A, Lamberts S, Casanueva FF, Trainer P, Ghigo E, Ho K, Melmed S, Acromegaly Consensus G (2010) A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:3141–3148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Nishioka H, Haraoka J (2008) Biochemical cure of acromegaly after transsphenoidal surgery despite residual tumor on magnetic resonance imaging: case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 48:311–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Shahlaie K, McLaughlin N, Kassam AB, Kelly DF (2010) The role of outcomes data for assessing the expertise of a pituitary surgeon. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 17:369–376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Schofl C, Franz H, Grussendorf M, Honegger J, Jaursch-Hancke C, Mayr B, Schopohl J, participants of the German Acromegaly R (2013) Long-term outcome in patients with acromegaly: analysis of 1344 patients from the German Acromegaly Register. Eur J Endocrinol 168:39–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES