Significance
Glucose-responsive insulin analogs or delivery systems are desirable for enhancing health and improving quality of life of people with diabetes. We describe here a simple strategy to engineer a long-acting insulin analog, which can establish an endogenous Glut-associated delivery reservoir of insulin that can modulate glucose metabolism in a blood glucose-dependent manner. Importantly, after subcutaneous injection, in vivo blood glucose regulation was validated in a type 1 diabetic mouse model with negligible hypoglycemia.
Keywords: drug delivery, diabetes, glucose-responsive, insulin, insulin analog
Abstract
Insulin therapy in the setting of type 1 and advanced type 2 diabetes is complicated by increased risk of hypoglycemia. This potentially fatal complication could be mitigated by a glucose-responsive insulin analog. We report an insulin-facilitated glucose transporter (Glut) inhibitor conjugate, in which the insulin molecule is rendered glucose-responsive via conjugation to an inhibitor of Glut. The binding affinity of this insulin analog to endogenous Glut is modulated by plasma and tissue glucose levels. In hyperglycemic conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes or the postprandial state), the in situ-generated insulin analog−Glut complex is driven to dissociate, freeing the insulin analog and glucose-accessible Glut to restore normoglycemia. Upon overdose, enhanced binding of insulin analog to Glut suppresses the glucose transport activity of Glut to attenuate further uptake of glucose. We demonstrate the ability of this insulin conjugate to regulate blood glucose levels within a normal range while mitigating the risk of hypoglycemia in a type 1 diabetic mouse model.
Diabetes mellitus affects more than 400 million people across the world (1–3). The treatment for type 1 and advanced type 2 diabetes is multiple daily injections or continuous infusion of exogenous insulin (1, 2, 4). However, the benefits of insulin therapy are often not fully realized, due to the risk of hypoglycemia associated with insulin overdose, which can result in seizure, coma, and death (5). Therefore, tremendous efforts have been devoted to the development of smart insulin delivery systems that mimic the glucose-dependent dynamic insulin secretion of β-cells, thereby reducing hyperglycemic condition and mitigating the risk of insulin-induced hypoglycemia associated with a miscalculated exogenous insulin dose (6, 7). To this end, chemically driven synthetic closed-loop insulin delivery systems integrating phenylboronic acid (7–16), glucose-binding protein (17–20), and glucose oxidase (21–26) have been extensively studied. However, synthetic strategies to tightly regulate blood glucose levels with a low risk of hypoglycemia remain elusive in clinical practice (27).
Here, we propose to expand the safety margin of insulin by simply conjugating insulin with a reversible glucose transporter (Glut) inhibitor. Glut is a family of transmembrane proteins that facilitate the transport of glucose across plasma membranes (28). Various compounds are able to competitively inhibit the glucose transport activity of Glut (29–31). Due to the presence of the Glut inhibitor, the insulin analog can reversibly and dynamically bind to Glut on cell membranes with an affinity modulated by surrounding glucose concentration, rendering the insulin molecule glucose-responsive (Fig. 1). Upon s.c. injection, this insulin analog can bind to insulin receptors (IR) as well as endogenous Glut, establishing an in situ-generated reservoir of insulin analog−Glut complex (Fig. 1). Upon a glucose challenge, such as the glucose rise associated with a meal, the insulin analog−Glut complexes dissociate to liberate free Glut on plasma membranes as well as free insulin analog into interstitial fluids and plasma. The free insulin analog can subsequently bind to IR to trigger the translocation of Glut4 to cell membranes and enhance glucose clearance into muscle and fat. Meanwhile, the Glut, which is previously inaccessible to glucose as part of the insulin analog−Glut complex, can enhance the blood glucose clearance. In excess doses, the insulin analog induces overexpression of Glut on plasma membranes and subsequently triggers the glucose uptake by cells, which could potentially induce hypoglycemia; however, the formation of the glucose-responsive insulin analog−Glut complexes can suppress the glucose transport efficiency of Glut, therefore reducing the hypoglycemic risk.
Results
Glut-i2, a reversible Glut inhibitor with a low dissociation constant and high affinity for Glut4 and Glut1 (32), was selected for our study. Glut-i2 was integrated with a single terminal amino group to give Glut-i2−NH2 (SI Appendix, Scheme S1 and Figs. S1–S5) (32). Next, Glut-i2−NH2 was conjugated to insulin via a bifunctional linker (17) succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate to give insulin−Glut-i2 conjugate (designated i-insulin), which was confirmed by measuring the molecular weight via the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization with a time-of-flight analyzer (SI Appendix, Fig. S6), while the modification was validated on A1 of insulin (SI Appendix, Fig. S7).
To test the binding ability of the i-insulin toward Glut, it was labeled with sulfo-Cyanine 5 (Cy5-i-insulin) and used to treat erythrocyte ghost, a widely used Glut carrier (SI Appendix, Fig. S8) (33, 34). After 30-min incubation with i-insulin at room temperature, the erythrocyte ghosts showed a high fluorescence intensity localized on the membranes, whereas the surrounding solvent showed a slightly weaker fluorescence (Fig. 2A). Control erythrocyte ghosts treated with Cy5-labeled native insulin only showed weak fluorescence comparable to the background (Fig. 2B). Moreover, the amount of Cy5-i-insulin bound to erythrocyte ghosts increased along with the increase of the concentration of free Cy5-i-insulin (SI Appendix, Fig. S9), and the Kd was measured as 13 nM (SI Appendix, Figs. S10 and S11 and Eqs. S1 and S2). The binding rate of i-insulin toward erythrocyte ghost was evaluated. Within 2 min of the addition of Cy5-i-insulin to the erythrocyte ghost solution, high fluorescence intensity localized on the erythrocyte membranes was observed (SI Appendix, Fig. S12A). A concurrent rapid decrease in the fluorescence intensity of the supernatant was also observed (SI Appendix, Fig. S13). Next, the in vitro release kinetics of i-insulin was investigated by diluting the Cy5-i-insulin−treated erythrocyte ghost solution and observing the fluorescent signal. A sharp decrease in fluorescence intensity was noted for all Cy5-i-insulin−treated erythrocyte ghosts within 2 min after a twofold, fourfold, and 10-fold dilution (SI Appendix, Fig. S12B).
Cy5-i-insulin−treated erythrocyte ghosts were further treated with glucose solutions at varying glucose concentrations of 0, 400, 800, and 1,600 mg/dL. The fluorescence intensity gradually decreased with increased glucose concentrations, consistent with the proposed dissociation of i-insulin−Glut complexes (Fig. 2 C and D). The glucose-responsive dissociation of i-insulin−Glut complex was further tested at physiological-relevant concentrations (1 and 5 nM) of i-insulin (35). The concentration of i-insulin increased in the supernatant as the glucose concentration was increased (Fig. 2 E and F). A 100% increase in the concentration of supernatant insulin was observed as the glucose concentration increased from 0 mg/dL to 400 mg/dL for both the 1- and 5-nM concentrations.
Next, the ability of i-insulin to regulate blood glucose levels was evaluated in the type 1 diabetic mice induced by streptozotocin (STZ). With s.c. injection, the i-insulin−treated mice sustained normoglycemia below 200 mg/dL for more than 10 h (Fig. 3A), whereas mice treated with native insulin showed less than 4 h of normoglycemia (Fig. 3A). Prolonged s.c. retention of i-insulin at the injection site compared with native insulin was observed (SI Appendix, Fig. S14). Of note is that mice treated with i-insulin showed negligible hypoglycemia (Fig. 3A). When a second injection of i-insulin or native insulin was administered 3 h posttreatment when normoglycemia was achieved, i-insulin−treated mice showed a significantly extended normoglycemia period with negligible hypoglycemia, while native insulin-treated mice showed marked hypoglycemia (Fig. 3B). This hypoglycemia-mitigating effect of i-insulin was further evaluated on healthy mice. Following s.c. injection, native insulin induced severe hypoglycemia represented by blood glucose levels of ∼60 mg/dL. In contrast, i-insulin−treated mice did not show glucose levels below 100 mg/dL (Fig. 3C).
An i.p. glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) was also performed at 3 h posttreatment. A spike in blood glucose levels was observed for all groups; however, only i-insulin−treated mice and healthy mice showed blood glucose levels back to normal range within 2 h (Fig. 3D). The enhanced ability of i-insulin in regulating blood glucose levels compared with native insulin was confirmed by the area under curve (AUC) analyses (Fig. 3E). Moreover, a peak of plasma insulin associated with IPGTT was observed without delay in the i-insulin−treated mice (Fig. 3F).
The toxicity of i-insulin to the liver and kidney was further evaluated via serum albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine (CREAT) levels, on days 1 and 3 after the s.c. injection of i-insulin (Fig. 4A). No significant differences across any biochemical measures were observed. In addition, there were no obvious changes in blood cell counts (Fig. 4B). Meanwhile, negligible neutrophil infiltration was observed at treated skin sites, as shown in the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain results (Fig. 4C). Moreover, the total levels of IgM and IgG associated with both healthy mice and diabetic mice were insignificantly changed during the 2-wk treatment (SI Appendix, Fig. S15) (36, 37). Systemic evaluation of the specific immune responses against i-insulin upon variation of treatment doses, frequencies, and routes are required for further translation (37, 38).
Discussion
Bioresponsive insulin-mediated treatment has the potential to revolutionize the current diabetes treatment. An insulin molecule with the properties of glucose responsiveness and hypoglycemia mitigation would offer a novel approach to regulate blood glucose levels with low risk for hypoglycemia. In this study, we engineered such a molecule via conjugation of insulin to the Glut competitive inhibitor Glut-i2 to allow i-insulin for reversible and glucose-responsive binding to endogenous Glut. In vitro, the i-insulin was able to rapidly bind to Glut on erythrocyte ghosts at low blood glucose concentrations, while releasing free and glucose-accessible Glut in response to hyperglycemia. Upon a glucose challenge, i-insulin was liberated from the i-insulin−Glut complex for subsequent binding to IR and rapid blood glucose clearance.
Upon s.c. injection in type 1 diabetic mice, i-insulin showed a significantly more durable normoglycemia effect with negligible hypoglycemia, even after a second injection. This result was further confirmed with studies showing that i-insulin only slightly lowered blood glucose of healthy mice, while native insulin induced severe hypoglycemia. Upon a glucose challenge, a portion of i-insulin was released from i-insulin−Glut complex directly to the interstitial fluid and plasma. Remarkably, the direct release of i-insulin to the interstitial environment may help i-insulin rapidly reach IRs on target cells. In addition, the release of i-insulin from the i-insulin−Glut complex generates glucose-accessible free Glut to enhance the excess glucose clearance from blood.
This glucose transporter inhibitor-mediated insulin can be further optimized, regarding response kinetics, effective duration, and Glut specificity, through varying the component(s) of glucose transporter inhibitor, insulin, and spacer. Moreover, this glucose-responsive insulin can be further integrated with painless transdermal microneedle array patch to generate a new version of “smart insulin patch” (SI Appendix, Fig. S16) (39, 40) or oral delivery systems to form “smart insulin pills” (41).
Materials and Methods
Experimental procedures for insulin analog synthesis and in vitro glucose-triggered insulin release, procedures for animal experiment, and additional control experiments are provided in SI Appendix. The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at North Carolina State University and the University of California, Los Angeles.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 DK112939 01A1 and UL1TR002489; Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Grant 2-SRA-2016-269-A-N; and grants from the start-up packages of University of California, Los Angeles. J.P.W. thanks the University of California, San Diego/University of California, Los Angeles National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Diabetes Research Center Grant P30 DK063491 for support.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: J.W. and Z.G. have applied for patents related to this study.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1901967116/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Reusch JE, Manson JE (2017) Management of type 2 diabetes in 2017: Getting to goal. JAMA 317:1015–1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yu J, Zhang Y, Bomba H, Gu Z (2016) Stimuli-responsive delivery of therapeutics for diabetes treatment. Bioeng Transl Med 1:323–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.VandenBerg MA, Webber MJ (January 3, 2019) Biologically inspired and chemically derived methods for glucose‐responsive insulin therapy. Adv Healthc Mater 10.1002/adhm.201801466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wagner AM, Gran MP, Peppas NA (2018) Designing the new generation of intelligent biocompatible carriers for protein and peptide delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B 8:147–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cryer P. (2016) Hypoglycemia in Diabetes: Pathophysiology, Prevalence, and Prevention (American Diabetes Assoc, Arlington, VA: ). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bakh NA, et al. (2017) Glucose-responsive insulin by molecular and physical design. Nat Chem 9:937–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lu Y, Aimetti AA, Langer R, Gu Z (2017) Bioresponsive materials. Nat Rev Mater 2:16075. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shiino D, et al. (1995) Amine containing phenylboronic acid gel for glucose-responsive insulin release under physiological pH. J Control Release 37:269–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Matsumoto A, et al. (2012) A synthetic approach toward a self-regulated insulin delivery system. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51:2124–2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chou DH, et al. (2015) Glucose-responsive insulin activity by covalent modification with aliphatic phenylboronic acid conjugates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:2401–2406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dong Y, et al. (2016) Injectable and glucose-responsive hydrogels based on boronic acid-glucose complexation. Langmuir 32:8743–8747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Veiseh O, Tang BC, Whitehead KA, Anderson DG, Langer R (2015) Managing diabetes with nanomedicine: Challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14:45–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen S, et al. (2018) Microneedle‐array patch fabricated with enzyme‐free polymeric components capable of on‐demand insulin delivery. Adv Funct Mater 29:1807369. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matsumoto A, et al. (2017) Synthetic “smart gel” provides glucose-responsive insulin delivery in diabetic mice. Sci Adv 3:eaaq0723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matsumoto A, et al. (2010) A totally synthetic glucose responsive gel operating in physiological aqueous conditions. Chem Commun (Camb) 46:2203–2205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Matsumoto A, Yoshida R, Kataoka K (2004) Glucose-responsive polymer gel bearing phenylborate derivative as a glucose-sensing moiety operating at the physiological pH. Biomacromolecules 5:1038–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang C, et al. (2017) Red blood cells for glucose-responsive insulin delivery. Adv Mater 29:1606617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brownlee M, Cerami A (1979) A glucose-controlled insulin-delivery system: Semisynthetic insulin bound to lectin. Science 206:1190–1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaarsholm NC, et al. (2018) Engineering glucose responsiveness into insulin. Diabetes 67:299–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang R, et al. (2018) A glucose-responsive insulin therapy protects animals against hypoglycemia. JCI Insight 3:e97476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fischel-Ghodsian F, Brown L, Mathiowitz E, Brandenburg D, Langer R (1988) Enzymatically controlled drug delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2403–2406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang J, et al. (2018) Core-shell microneedle gel for self-regulated insulin delivery. ACS Nano 12:2466–2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Podual K, Doyle FJ III, Peppas NA (2000) Glucose-sensitivity of glucose oxidase-containing cationic copolymer hydrogels having poly(ethylene glycol) grafts. J Control Release 67:9–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Podual K, Doyle FJ III, Peppas NA (2000) Preparation and dynamic response of cationic copolymer hydrogels containing glucose oxidase. Polymer (Guildf) 41:3975–3983. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Podual K, Doyle FJ III, Peppas NA (2000) Dynamic behavior of glucose oxidase-containing microparticles of poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted cationic hydrogels in an environment of changing pH. Biomaterials 21:1439–1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gu Z, et al. (2013) Injectable nano-network for glucose-mediated insulin delivery. ACS Nano 7:4194–4201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yu J, Zhang Y, Yan J, Kahkoska AR, Gu Z (2018) Advances in bioresponsive closed-loop drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm 544:350–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gould GW, Holman GD (1993) The glucose transporter family: Structure, function and tissue-specific expression. Biochem J 295:329–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Granchi C, Fortunato S, Minutolo F (2016) Anticancer agents interacting with membrane glucose transporters. MedChemComm 7:1716–1729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Siebeneicher H, et al. (2016) Identification of novel GLUT inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26:1732–1737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chan DA, et al. (2011) Targeting GLUT1 and the Warburg effect in renal cell carcinoma by chemical synthetic lethality. Sci Transl Med 3:94ra70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kapoor K, et al. (2016) Mechanism of inhibition of human glucose transporter GLUT1 is conserved between cytochalasin B and phenylalanine amides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4711–4716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jung CY, Rampal AL (1977) Cytochalasin B binding sites and glucose transport carrier in human erythrocyte ghosts. J Biol Chem 252:5456–5463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kasahara M, Hinkle PC (1977) Reconstitution and purification of the D-glucose transporter from human erythrocytes. J Biol Chem 252:7384–7390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Olefsky J, Farquhar JW, Reaven G (1973) Relationship between fasting plasma insulin level and resistance to insulin-mediated glucose uptake in normal and diabetic subjects. Diabetes 22:507–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang W, et al. (2014) Poly(carboxybetaine) nanomaterials enable long circulation and prevent polymer-specific antibody production. Nano Today 9:10–16. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Torosantucci R, et al. (2014) Development of a transgenic mouse model to study the immunogenicity of recombinant human insulin. J Pharm Sci 103:1367–1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ottesen JL, et al. (1994) The potential immunogenicity of human insulin and insulin analogues evaluated in a transgenic mouse model. Diabetologia 37:1178–1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yu J, et al. (2015) Microneedle-array patches loaded with hypoxia-sensitive vesicles provide fast glucose-responsive insulin delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USAProc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:8260–8265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Veiseh O, Langer R, et al. (2015) Diabetes: A smart insulin patch. Nature 524:39–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yu J, et al. (December 18, 2018) Glucose-responsive oral insulin delivery for postprandial glycemic regulation. Nano Res, 10.1007/s12274-018-2264-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.