Abstract
Aberrant activation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-Met signaling pathway caused by gene amplification or mutation plays an important role in tumorigenesis. Therefore, c-Met is considered as an attractive target for cancer therapy and c-Met inhibitors have been developed with great interests. However, cancers treated with c-Met inhibitors inevitably develop resistance commonly caused by the activation of PI3K/Akt signal transduction pathway. Therefore, the combination of c-Met and PI3Kα inhibitors showed synergistic activities, especially, in c-Met hyperactivated and PIK3CA-mutated cells. In our previous study, we rationally designed and synthesized DFX117(6-(5-(2,4-difluorophenylsulfonamido)-6-methoxypyridin-3-yl)-N-(2-morpholinoethyl) imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carboxamide) as a novel PI3Kα selective inhibitor. Herein, the antitumor activity and underlying mechanisms of DFX117 against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells were evaluated in both in vitro and in vivo animal models. Concurrent targeted c-Met and PI3Kα by DFX117 dose-dependent inhibited the cell growth of H1975 cells (PIK3CA mutation and c-Met amplification) and A549 cells (KRAS mutation). DFX117 subsequently induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. These data highlight the significant potential of DFX117 as a feasible and efficacious agent for the treatment of NSCLC patients.
Keywords: dual inhibitor of PI3K and Met; 3-substituted imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (DFX117); cell cycle arrest; apoptosis; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
1. Introduction
c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), activated by its ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), is frequently hyperactivated, amplified or mutated in many human cancers including lung cancer [1,2,3,4]. The binding of HGF with c-Met leads to c-Met autophosphorylation at tyrosine residues Y1234 and Y1235 within the activation loop of the kinase domain and then eventually phosphorylates at tyrosines Y1349 and Y1356 to activate c-Met-mediated signaling pathway. Sustained activation of c-Met signaling triggers multiple signaling cascades which subsequently regulate various cellular processes including cell survival, proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis such as PI3K/Akt, MEK/MAPK and STAT3 pathways [1,2,3,4]. In addition, c-Met gene amplification or mutation is also conferred to intrinsic resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) [5,6,7]. There is an increasing number of evidence that show that the c-Met inhibitor exhibits a strong synergistic effect with EGFR inhibitors on EGFR-TKI resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells harboring acquired c-Met gene amplification [8,9,10]. Therefore, c-Met is considered as an attractive target biomarker for cancer therapy, particularly for EGFR-TKI resistant cancer. In line with this, a diverse class of c-Met inhibitors has been developed as anticancer agents for c-Met-driven tumors [11,12,13].
The continuous use of c-Met inhibitors develops drug resistance which commonly occurs through the activation of Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling, amplification of c-Met and KRAS mutation [14,15]. Mutations in members of the PI3K pathway are most commonly encountered in the PIK3CA, which encoded p110α catalytic subunit of PI3K, and tumors harboring PIK3CA mutations remain active upon c-Met inhibition, which render drug resistance to c-Met inhibitors [16,17]. Thus, it is quite clear that combination of c-Met and PI3Kα inhibitors might have synergistic activity, especially in c-Met hyperactivated, EGFR T790M and PIK3CA-mutated cell lines (e.g., NCI-H1975 cells). Currently, increased evidence of clinical data shows the limitation of activity of single PI3K inhibitor at tolerated doses [17,18]. However, combined targeting of PI3K and c-Met could improve the tolerability and increase efficacy compared to a single PI3K inhibition or c-MET inhibition [16,17,18]. Supposedly, a dual inhibitor of PI3Kα and c-Met might be an effective therapeutic agent to overcome drug resistance or enhance the efficacy of single treatment.
Somatic KRAS mutations also strongly decrease the effectiveness of c-Met inhibitors through sustained ERK, MAPK and PI3K activation [19,20]. It suggests that simultaneously targeting both c-Met and KRAS might be an effective strategy when both oncogenic drivers are overexpressed [20,21]. Therefore, the development of a dual inhibitor of PI3Kα and c-Met could provide therapeutic benefits specifically to patients with c-Met amplification and EGFR mutation or KRAS mutation NSCLCs.
We recently designed and synthesized a new 3-substituted imidazo[1, 2-a]pyridine derivative, named DFX117 (6-(5-(2,4-difluorophenylsulfonamido)-6-Methoxypyridin-3-yl)-N- (2-morpholinoethyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carboxamide), which exhibited a potent PI3Kα inhibitory activity with IC50 value of 0.5 nM [22]. The present study revealed that DFX117 is also a potent c-Met tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Importantly, DFX117 exhibited a favorable antitumor activity against NSCLC cells harboring c-Met amplification, EGFR and KRAS mutation. Herein, we report studies on the antitumor activity and the underlying mechanism of DFX117 against NSCLC cells NCI-H1975 (c-Met-amplified, PI3K-mutated, and EGFR-mutated cells) and A549 (KRAS mutated cells).
2. Results
2.1. DFX117 Exhibits Anti-Proliferative Activity of Lung Cancer Cells
Our previous study revealed that DFX117 is a selective PI3Kα inhibitor with an IC50 value of 0.5 nM in cell-free assays [22]. DFX117 also exhibited the growth inhibitory activity against various cancer cells including the A549 cells [22]. Considering the role of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in lung cancer development, we further extended to evaluate the anti-proliferative activity of DFX117 in cultured several human lung cancer cell lines (NCI-H1975, NCI-H1993, and HCC827). DFX117 significantly inhibited the growth of all tested lung cancer cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 0.02 to 0.08 μM (Figure 1A,C). Among the tested cell lines, the NCI-H1975 cells were the most sensitive to DFX117 with an IC50 value of 0.02 μΜ. Therefore, further analysis of DFX117 to elucidate the plausible mechanisms of action in the antitumor activity was performed in the A549 (wild-type PIK3CA and EGFR) and NCI-H1975 (mutated PIK3CA and EGFR) cells [23]. The growth inhibitory activity of DFX117 in both A549 and NCI-H1975 cells was found to be superior to that of HS-173, a known PI3Kα inhibitor [21]. DFX117 showed selective growth inhibition of lung cancer cells compared to normal cell lines MRC-5 (human fetal lung fibroblasts) with the IC50 values of approximately 40 times difference (Figure 1B,C). The colony formation was also significantly inhibited by DFX117 (Figure 1D,E), which is consistent with the result of the growth-inhibitory activity performed by the SRB assay (Figure 1A).
2.2. DFX117 Suppresses the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathways in Lung Cancer Cells
To further elucidate the anticancer mechanism of DFX117, the regulation of PI3K signal transduction pathway associated with cancer cell growth was analyzed using Western blot analysis. After DFX117 treatment for 24 h, the protein levels of PI3K signaling pathways including p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-p70S6K, p-GSK3β, p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E were effectively suppressed in both A549 and NCI-H1975 cells (Figure 2A,B). In contrast, the expression of PTEN, a tumor suppressor was enhanced by the treatment of DFX117 in both cells (Figure 2A,B). The suppressive effect of DFX117 on p-Akt expression was also manifested by observation of immunofluorescence analysis under a confocal microscope after treated with DFX117 (0.2 µM) for 8 h in A549 (Figure 2C) and NCI-H1975 cells (Figure 2D,E). Interestingly, DFX117 effectively suppressed the expression of mRNA of PIK3CA in a concentration-dependent manner, which is different from other PI3K kinase inhibitors (Figure 2F,G).
2.3. DFX117 Inhibits c-Met Kinase Activity
To further determine the possible target of DFX117, we employed phospho-RTK array analysis using A549 cells. Data suggested that up-regulated phospho-Met level was markedly suppressed upon DFX117 (0.2 μM) treatment (Figure 3A). Based on these data, we assumed that the Met might be one of plausible molecular targets for DFX117-mediated growth inhibition of cancer cells. Therefore, we further evaluated the effects of DFX117 on Met activity employing molecular docking study and cell-free kinase activity assays. As shown in Figure 3B, DFX117 formed a single typical hydrogen bond between the nitrogen atom of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine moiety and the back-bone carbonyl of Met1160, which is a characteristic of c-Met inhibitors bound to ATP binding site in kinase domains. The sulfonamide group forms another two hydrogen bonds with residues Asp1164 and Asn1167. Moreover, the morpholinyl formed an additional hydrogen bond with the back-bone NH of Asp1222. All these hydrogen bonds would stabilize the conformations and interactions between DFX117 and ATP binding site of c-Met in kinase domains with lower energy. DFX117 formed hydrophobic interactions with c-Met to fit the hydrophobic pocket composed by Ile1084, Met1211, Ala1108, Tyr1159 and Gly1163. DFX117 also effectively inhibited the cell-free kinase activity of c-Met with an IC50 of 17.1 nM (Figure 3C). In the same experimental condition, crizotinib, a positive control, exhibited an IC50 value of 11 nM. These data suggest that DFX117 is a potent Met kinase inhibitor and the down-regulation of phospho-Met level might be associated with the inhibition of Met kinase activity in the cells.
2.4. DFX117 Suppresses the Met Signaling Pathway in Lung Cancer Cells
Since DFX117 exhibited Met kinase inhibition activity, further study was conducted to assess the effect of DFX117 on Met signaling pathways. Primarily, the levels of activated Met (phospho-Met) and Met-mediated downstream molecules were determined by Western blot analysis after treatment of DFX117 for 24 h in A549 and NCI-H1975 cells. As shown in Figure 3D,E, the levels of phosphorylated Met, activation forms of Met, were significantly suppressed by DFX117 in a concentration-dependent manner in both cells. The suppression of Met activation by DFX117 subsequently down-regulated the Met-mediated major downstream molecules including p-RAC1, p-STAT3 and p-ERK1/2, which are highly associated with the cell proliferation and survival, in a concentration-dependent manner without obvious alterations of each of total protein levels.
2.5. DFX117 Induces G1 Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in Lung Cancer Cells
It is well-known that the PI3K and Met signaling pathways are highly associated with the regulation of cell cycle checkpoints in cancer cell proliferation. To further evaluate the effects of DFX117 on the cell cycle regulation, the cells were treated with DFX117 for 24 h, and cell cycle distribution was detected by FACS analysis. DFX117 induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase in a concentration-dependent manner compared to that of the control groups in both A549 and NCI-H1975 cells (Figure 4A,B). The effects of DFX117 on cell cycle regulation were further confirmed by Western blot analysis. As shown in Figure 4C,D, the phospho-cyclin D1 at Thr286, which enhanced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of cyclin D1, was increased by DFX117 with a decrease in cyclin D1. In addition, the expression levels of c-Myc, CDK2/4, cyclin E, cyclin A, Rb and p-Rb were significantly suppressed, but the stabilization of p27 and p21 expression levels was upregulated by DFX117 treatment for 24 h in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 4C–F). These findings suggest that the anti-proliferative activity of DFX117 in cancer cells is in part correlated with the induction of G0/G1 cell cycle arrest via its regulation of the expression levels of proteins in the PI3K/Akt and c-Met pathways.
To further evaluate whether DFX117 is able to induce apoptotic cell death after an extended exposure time in lung cancer cells, the cells were treated with DFX117 for 48 h, and Annexin V-positive cells were detected by FACS analysis. As shown in Figure 5A,B, the population of apoptotic cells (Annexin V positive) was increased in a concentration-dependent manner in both A549 (from 6.09% to 26.84% at 0.4 μM DFX117) and NCI-H1975 (from 4.15% to 32.75% at 0.4 μM DFX117) cells. These data indicated that the longer exposure of DFX117 induced apoptotic cell death in both lung cancer cell lines. To further clarify the molecular mechanisms involved in the induction of apoptosis by DFX117, the effect of DFX117 on the expression levels of apoptosis-associated proteins was examined by Western blot analysis after treatment with DFX117 for 48 h in A549 and NCI-H1975 cells. In comparison to the vehicle-treated control group, the p53, Bax and Bad expressions were upregulated by DFX117 treatment, and the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 was downregulated (Figure 5C,D). DFX117 also triggered the activation of the caspase-dependent apoptotic cascade. The cleaved caspase-9 and cleaved caspase-3 expressions were remarkably increased when treated with DFX117 at 0.4 μM, and subsequently elevated the expression level of cleaved PARP in both A549 and NCI-H1975 cells (Figure 5C,D). Taken together, these data suggested that DFX117 induced apoptotic cell death via the caspase (intrinsic) pathway in A549 and NCI-H1975 cells.
2.6. DFX117 Inhibits Tumor Growth in a Xenograft Mouse Model
The antitumor activity of DFX117 was further determined in a nude mouse xenograft model implanted with A549 (3 × 106 cells/mouse) and NCI-H1975 human lung cancer cells (7 × 106 cells/mouse). When the tumor volume reached approximately 100 mm3, DFX117 (5, 10 or 20 mg/kg) was orally administered daily for 23 days in A549 xenograft model. At the termination of the experiment (30 days after inoculation), the tumor volumes in the vehicle (normal saline)-treated control group were approximately 1100 mm3. Compared to that of the control group, tumor growth was significantly inhibited by DFX117 treatment. The inhibition rates of the tumor volume relative to the control group were 48.1%, 67.3% and 79.9% at 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg DFX117, respectively, in A549 cells-implanted xenograft model (Figure 6A). No overt toxicity or body weight change was observed with DFX117 administration (Figure 6B). The excised tumor weights on the termination day were also significantly inhibited by DFX117 treatment (Figure 6C). Similarly, in NCI-H1975 xenograft model, the inhibition rates of the tumor volume relative to the control group were 52.0% and 81.89% at 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg DFX117 treatment, respectively (Figure 6G). No overt toxicity or body weight change was observed, and the tumor weights were found to be significantly inhibited by DFX117 administration in NCI-H1975 cells-implanted nude mouse models (Figure 6H,I). These data indicated that the oral administration of DFX117 exerted a potential antitumor activity without toxicity in animal models. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis of tumor tissues showed that administration of DFX117 effectively suppressed the expressions of p-Met and p-Akt (Figure 6D,J). The expression level of cleaved caspase-3 was remarkably increased, and effectively suppressed the expression of Ki67 which is a cell proliferation marker, in the DFX117 treatment group compared to vehicle-treated control groups (Figure 6D). We also confirmed the effects of DFX117 on mRNA levels of PIK3CA in tumors. In accordance with the in vitro results, mRNA levels of PIK3CA were dose-dependently decreased in DFX117-treated tumors (Appendix A). In addition, the protein expression levels of p-Met, Grb2, p-GSK3β, p-mTOR, p-STAT3 and p-ERK1/2 were also downregulated by DFX117, suggesting that the Met and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway was inhibited by DFX117 in the in vivo model (Figure 6E,F). The change in the expression levels of proteins related to apoptotic cell death, including p53, Bax, cleaved caspase-9, caspase-3, PARP and Bcl-2, in the tumor tissues was also consistent with the findings from the in vitro cell culture system (Figure 6E,F). Overall, these data suggested that DFX117 effectively inhibited the tumor growth of lung cancer cells in vivo and that the antitumor activity of DFX117 might be partly associated with the downstream regulation of the Met/PI3K/Akt pathway. As shown in Figure 6K,L, the protein expression levels of p-Met as well as its downstream components such as Grb2, p-GSK3β, p-mTOR, p-STAT3 and p-4ERK1/2 were also downregulated by DFX117, suggesting that the Met and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway were in part involved in the antitumor activity of DFX117 in the NCI-H1975 cells-implanted xenograft model.
2.7. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of DFX117
Since DFX117 exerted a promising profile for antitumor activity in in vitro cell culture and in vivo xenograft mouse model as a dual PI3Kα and c-Met inhibitor, we further investigated its pharmacokinetic parameters in male ICR mice. The oral administration of 10 mg/kg DFX117 exhibited that the mean residence time (MRT) was 2.2 h and AUC was 3340.6 h·ng/mL (Table 1). When administered orally, DFX117 was quickly absorbed with a Tmax of 0.3 h. The overall PK parameters of DFX117 seem to be promising and encouraging its further evaluation for development of antitumor agents.
Table 1.
Parameters | T1/2 (h) | Tmax (h) | Cmax (ng/mL) | AUCall (h·ng/mL) | MRTinf_obs (h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Value (po b) | 2.1 | 0.3 | 4504.3 | 3340.6 | 2.2 |
a Values are the average of three runs. Vehicle: DMSO: PEG: saline = 1:4:5. b Dose: po at 10 mg/mL. T1/2, half-life; Cmax, maximum concentration; Tmax, time of maximum concentration; AUCall (h·ng/mL), area under the plasma concentration time curve.
3. Discussion
Numerous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting PI3K and c-Met has been approved (Idelalisib and Crizotinib) or are tested in clinical trials [4,7]. Although TKIs are initially very promising, their efficacy is limited caused by the development of drug resistance [16,17,18,24,25]. Recent studies indicated that PI3Kα was overexpressed or mutated in Met inhibitor resistant cells and tumor xenografts, suggesting co-targeting PI3Kα might be highly promising anticancer therapeutics for Met inhibitor resistant cancer [16,17,18,24,25]. The A549 cells with mutant KRAS and wild EGFR are rarely respond to the therapy of EGFR-TKI and Met inhibitor, indicating that the benefits of EGFR-TKI or Met inhibitor therapy can be impaired by KRAS mutation [26,27,28,29,30]. The NCI-H1975 cells harboring Met amplification, EGFR (T790M and L858R) mutation and PIK3CA mutation which contribute to EGFR-TKI resistance showed very low chemosensitivity to EGFR-TKI in preclinical trial [31,32,33]. Therefore, there remains an urgent need for effective and safe therapeutic agents for the treatment of these kinds of TKI resistance tumors and combination therapies can be an effective long-term treatment of cancer with TKI resistance [10,34,35].
In this study, we found that DFX117, designed and synthesized as a PI3Kα inhibitors in the previous study, showed remarkable antitumor activity in both A549 and NCI-H1975 in vitro and in vivo, particularly in NCI-H1975 cells with mutations of EGFR and PIK3CA as well as c-Met amplification. The data suggested that DFX117 might be a potential candidate agent for all these mutant tumors in RTK signaling pathway. This was also further confirmed by the significant inhibitory effect on cell proliferation of HCC827 cells (EGFR mutation) and H1993 cells (c-Met amplification). In addition, compared to a highly selective PI3Kα inhibitor HS-173, DFX117 exhibited the more potent growth inhibition of these tested cancer cells in vitro as well as tumor growth in in vivo xenograft model. The data suggested that DFX117, the rationally designed a dual inhibitor of PI3Kα and Met, improved physicochemical properties and enhanced antitumor activities.
It is known that afatinib resistant NCI-H1975 tumor clones showed lower PTEN expression levels than control clones, suggesting the decreased PTEN expression might contribute to the resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy [32,35]. In addition, PTEN restoration attenuated the tumor growth and development induced by Met activation or amplification [35,36]. PTEN affects c-Met dependent signaling at multiple levels including counteracting the effects of PI3K on Akt, regulation of c-Met-dependent gene expression and dephosphorylate proteins that are activated by c-Met [32,37,38]. Therefore, it is generally considered that combining with c-Met inhibitor and PTEN restoration has a beneficial anticancer effect. The present studies showed that DFX117 effectively enhanced the PTEN expression in A549 and NCI-H1975 cells. The up-regulation of PTEN expression by DFX117 might be one of reasons in the enhancement of the efficacy in the anti-proliferation and apoptosis induced by EGFR-TKI in NSCLC [37,38,39].
Met amplification is a well-established paradigm ligand-independent Met activation in NSCLC, and impaired Met receptor degradation seems to be an equally important mechanism for sustained aberrant Met signaling [36]. DFX117 significantly down-regulated Met receptor expression in the NCI-H1975 cells and inhibited Met kinase activity. The finding suggests that DFX117 is able to modulate the aberrant activated Met signaling in the PIK3CA mutation and c-Met amplification NSCLC cells.
In summary, the present study demonstrates a novel compound DFX117, a dual inhibitor of PI3K and Met, with a potential antitumor activity in human lung cancer cells. In particular, DFX117 might be applicable candidate for further prioritization in the development anticancer agents for non-small lung cancer cells with KRAS mutation, EGFR mutation and Met amplification cells.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Cell Lines
Human embryonic kidney cell HEK293, human non-small-cell lung cancer NCI-H1993, and NCI-H1975 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Human normal lung fibroblast MRC-5 cells and human non-small-cell lung cancer A549 cells were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). Human non-small-cell lung cancer PC-9 cells were provided by Drs. Jin Kyung Rho and Jae Cheol Lee (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea). The A549, PC9, NCI-H1993, and NCI-H1975 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (10% FBS, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and antibiotics-antimycotics (100 units/mL penicillin G sodium, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 250 ng/mL amphotericin B). MRC-5 and HEK293 cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics-antimycotics. Cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.
4.2. Reagents
Phospho-Met (Tyr1349), phospho-Met (Tyr1003), phospho-Rac1/cdc42(Ser71), Rac1/2/3, phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2), phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, Ki-67, p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2), phospho-PDK1 (Ser241), PDK1, PTEN, PI3 kinase p110α antibody, phospho-PI3 kinase p85 (Tyr458)/p55 (Tyr199), phospho-Akt (Ser473), phospho-Akt (Thr308), phospho-mTOR (Ser2448), mTOR, phospho-GSK-3α/β (Ser21/9), GSK-3β (3D10), phospho-p70S6 kinase (T389), p70S6 kinase, phospho-4E-BP1 (Thr37/46) (236B4), 4E-BP1 (53H11), phospho-eI4FE (Ser209), eI4FE, phospho-Cyclin D1, Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1 (HE12), Cyclin A, PCNA, phospho-Rb (S807/811), Rb, Caspase-3 (8G10), Caspase-9, PARP, Bad, Cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175) (5A1E) and phospho-Met (Tyr1234/1235) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). The Met kinase assay/inhibitor screening kit (# KA0055) was purchased from Abnova (Walnut, CA, USA).
4.3. Cell Viability Assay
Cell viability assay was performed using SRB assay as described previously [22].
4.4. Colony Formation
The cells (500 cells) were seeded in 6-well plates and cultured overnight before treatment with DMSO or DFX117 at indicated concentration for 72 h. The cells were then washed once with PBS and continue to culture with full-growth medium for 10 days, change the culture medium to fresh ones every three days. Cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet after fixing with 100% methanol.
4.5. c-Met Kinase Activity Assay
The effect of DFX117 on Met kinase assay was measured by Met Kinase Assay/Inhibitor Screening Kit (Cat # KA0055, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
4.6. Western Blotting
Cells were treated with various concentrations of DFX117. Western blot analysis was performed as described previously [22]. Blots were imaged by ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA).
4.7. Immunofluorescence Microscopy
The immunofluorescence staining was carried out as described previously with the indicated antibodies [40]. The confocal dish was coated with 0.2% gelatin before cell culture. After DFX117 treatment for 8 h, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. Then, cells were blocked with 1% BSA for 2 h at room temperature and rinsed three times with washing buffer. Cells were incubated with p-Akt (Ser473) at 4 °C overnight before the second antibody incubation for 1 h at room temperature in dark. Finally, the DAPI staining was performed before visualization under confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP8, Wetzlar, Germany). The images were recorded by a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope using a 40× Silicone Oil Objective (40×/1.30 NA).
4.8. Cell Cycle Analysis
Cells cycle analysis was carried out as described previously [41]. Cell cycle analysis was analyzed after DFX117 treatment for 24 h. Briefly, cells were plated in culture dishes and cultured with fresh medium without FBS for 12 h. Then, cells were treated with DFX117 for 24 h and remove the supernatant, the treated cells were fixed with 70% ethanol overnight before staining with propidium iodide mixed with RNase. Keep the dying cells under dark conditions at room temperature for 30 min before being subjected to flow cytometry analysis.
4.9. Annexin FITC/PI Assay
Annexin FITC/PI assay was performed as described previously [42]. Cell apoptosis was evaluated using Annexin V FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Cells were cultured in culture dishes for 12 h and treated with DFX117 for 48 h. Wash the cells with cold PBS buffer before staining with 5 μL of Annexin V-FITC and 5 μL of propidium iodide in the 500 μL 1× binding buffer. Finally, the stained cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark before analyzing with FACS Calibur flow cytometer, (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).
4.10. Phospho-Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Array
Phosphorylated RTKs were measured with the Human Phospho-RTK Array Kit (ARY001B) from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 250 μg of lysates from the A549 cells treated with DMSO or DFX117 for 8 h were subjected to analysis.
4.11. Molecular Docking Studies
Molecular docking was performed according to the previous study [22]. The crystal structure of c-Met (PDB entry code: 2RFN) in complex with AM7 was used for molecular modeling. The AutoDock 4.2 was employed for docking calculations. The protein optimization of c-Met was carried out using Sybyl 7.3, the cocrystallization ligand and water of c-Met was extracted before minimization. Docking parameters and fragmental volumes for the proteins were assigned using the addsol utility in the AutoDock 4.2 program. The size of energy grid box was set to A 60 × 60 × 60 Å with a grid spacing of 0.375 Å based on its cocrystallization ligand. Affinity grid fields were generated using the auxiliary program AutoGrid 4.0. The Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) was used to find the appropriate binding positions, orientations and conformations of the ligands. In each group, the lowest binding energy configuration with the highest % frequency was selected as the group representative. Accelrys Discovery Studio Visualizer 4.5 was used for graphic display.
4.12. RNA Extraction and Real-Time PCR
RNA extraction and real-time PCR were carried out as described previously [3]. The following sequences were used: PIK3CA forward: CCA CGA CCA TCA TCA GGT GAA C; PIK3CA reverse: CCT CAC GGA GGC ATT CTA AAG T.
4.13. Pharmacokinetic Studies of DFX117
The male ICR mice (25–30 g, 7–8 weeks of age) were purchased from Koatech Co. (Pyeontak, Kyonggi-do, Korea). Animals were fed with free access to standard chow diet and water. All animal use and care followed the guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Flow Sciences.INC. (Approval No.: NDDC PK 2018 076 01-DFX117-(4364)). Animals were acclimatized for 1 week at of 23–25 °C temperature, 40–70% relative humidity and 12 h light/12 h dark cycle before study. DFX117 aqueous solution was prepared in a mixture of 10% DMSO, 40% polyethylene glycol (PEG400) in saline and then oral administrated at a dose of 10 mg/kg. Two groups of mice were orally administered either DFX117 (n = 5) at 10 mg/kg or vehicle solvent. Approximately 80 µL of blood samples were collected into BD Microtainer plasma separator tubes at times 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0 h through the saphenous vein over 24 h post dosing. Blood samples were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 5 min and stored in a freezer until analysis. Protein precipitation was conducted on 15 µL of plasma samples using three volumes of acetonitrile containing carbamazepine as an internal analytical standard. After centrifugation, the supernatant was analyzed on a Nexera XR system (Shimadzu, Japan) system coupled with TSQ vantage triple quadruple (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) system. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Kinetex XB-C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.6 μm, particle size; Phenomenex, CA, USA) running a linear gradient of solvent A (0.1% formic acid in deionized water) and B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile). Detection of the analyte ions was performed in a positive MRM mode, monitoring the following precursor >product ion transitions: m/z 573.1 > 417.8. Analytical data were processed using MassHunter B04.01 (Agilent Korea, Seoul, Korea). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated via non-compartmental analysis of the plasma concentration-time profiles using PK Solver.
4.14. Tumor Xenograft Studies
All animal experiments were followed the guidelines approved by the Seoul National University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC permission number SNU-170103-2-1). The models of xenograft tumors were set up by subcutaneous injection of 3 × 106 cells (A549) or 7 × 106 cells (NCI-H1975) in 200 μL of PBS. The mice were randomly divided into four groups for A549 (control group, 20 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg of DFX117) and three groups for NCI-H1975 (control group, 20 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg of DFX117). Drug treatment started when their tumor volumes reached to 80–100 mm3. Mice of the control group were administered with 0.2 mL vehicle (DMSO: PEG400: saline = 1:4:5) by oral gavage daily and the other group with various doses of DFX117 for 23 days. Body weight and tumor size were measured three times per week. The tumor size was calculated according to the formula V = 0.5 × length × width2.
4.15. Immunohistochemistry
The immunohistochemistry of the tumors was carried out as described previously with the indicated antibodies [40].
4.16. Statistical Analysis
Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was assessed using Student’s t test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) coupled with Dennett’s t test.
5. Conclusions
In this study, the antitumor activity and underlying mechanisms of DFX117 against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells were evaluated in both in vitro and in vivo animal models. Concurrent targeted c-Met and PI3Kα by DFX117 dose-dependent inhibited the cell growth of H1975 cells (PIK3CA mutation and c-Met amplification) and A549 cells (KRAS mutation). DFX117 subsequently induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The combined observations indicate DFX117 might be applicable candidate for further prioritization in the development anticancer agents for non-small lung cancer cells with KRAS mutation, EGFR mutation and Met amplification cells. In addition, these data highlight the significant potential of DFX117 as a feasible and efficacious agent for the treatment of NSCLC patients.
Appendix A
Author Contributions
S.K.L. and Y.X. designed the research study; Y.F., H.D. and D.K. initiated the experiments. Y.F. and J.-Y.H. performed and analyzed the experiments. Y.F., D.K. and S.K.L. wrote and edited the paper. D.-H.B. participated in some in vivo experiments.
Funding
This study was supported by a grant for the Procurement & Development of Biological Resources and Bio & Medical Technology Development Program funded by a National Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2016M3A9B6903499 and No. 2016R1C1B1008540) and the China Scholarship Council.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Eder J.P., Woude G.F.V., Boerner S.A., LoRusso P.M. Novel therapeutic inhibitors of the c-Met signaling pathway in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:2207–2214. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Appleman L.J. MET signaling pathway: a rational target for cancer therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:4837–4838. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu X., Yao W., Newton R.C., Scherle P.A. Targeting the c-MET signaling pathway for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008;17:997–1011. doi: 10.1517/13543784.17.7.997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sierra J.R., Tsao M.-S. c-MET as a potential therapeutic target and biomarker in cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2011;3:21–35. doi: 10.1177/1758834011422557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Feng Z., Ren Y., Cui Y., Chen H., Jiao L., Dai G., Fan S., Sun J., Yu Y., Yang S. Synergistic effect of c-Met inhibitor volitinib in combination with EGFR inhibitor Gefitnib on EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC model HCC827C4R harboring acquired Met gene amplification. Cancer Res. 2013;73:971. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baldacci S., Kherrouche Z., Stoven L., Werkmeister E., Marchand N., Tulasne D., Cortot A. Met amplification induces an aggressive phenotype in egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur. Respir. J. 2015;46:OA4981. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goździkspychalska J., Szyszkabarth K., Spychalski L., Ramlau K., Wójtowicz J., Batura-Gabrye H. c-MET inhibitors in the treatment of lung cancer. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2014;15:670–682. doi: 10.1007/s11864-014-0313-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Francesca I., Viviana D.R., Sara G., Mariarosaria P., Marcello M., Adelaide G., Matteo G., Giovanni O., Rosa F., Arturo B. Monitoring reversal of MET-mediated resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer using 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:4806–4815. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shinji T., Wei W., Qi L., Tadaaki Y., Kenji K., Donev I.S., Takahiro N., Kunio M., Eiji S., Yasuhiko N. Dual inhibition of Met kinase and angiogenesis to overcome HGF-induced EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR mutant lung cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 2012;181:1034–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Simiczyjew A., Dratkiewicz E., Van Troys M., Ampe C., Styczeń I., Nowak D. Combination of EGFR Inhibitor Lapatinib and MET Inhibitor Foretinib Inhibits Migration of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines. Cancers. 2018;10:E335. doi: 10.3390/cancers10090335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Underiner T.L., Herbertz T., Miknyoczki S.J. Discovery of small molecule c-Met inhibitors: Evolution and profiles of clinical candidates. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2010;10:7–27. doi: 10.2174/1871520611009010007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ma P.C., Schaefer EChristensen J.G., Salgia R. A selective small molecule c-MET Inhibitor, PHA665752, cooperates with rapamycin. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:2312–2319. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Azuma K. Phase II study of erlotinib plus tivantinib (ARQ 197) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer just after progression on EGFR-TKI, gefitinib or erlotinib. Esmo Open. 2016;1:e000063. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qi J., McTigue M.A., Rogers A., Lifshits E., Christensen J.G., Jänne P.A., Engelman J.A. Multiple mutations and bypass mechanisms can contribute to development of acquired resistance to MET inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1081–1091. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Virna C., J Rafael S., Simona C., Elena G., Laura C., Tim P., Paolo Maria C., Silvia G. MET and KRAS gene amplification mediates acquired resistance to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7580–7590. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nisa L., Häfliger P., Poliaková M., Giger R., Francica P., Aebersold D.M., Charles R.P., Zimmer Y., Medová M. PIK3CA hotspot mutations differentially impact responses to MET targeting in MET-driven and non-driven preclinical cancer models. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:93. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0660-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fujian J., Xuanwen L., Yuanyu W., Xuedong F., Guomin H. Overexpression of PI3K p110α contributes to acquired resistance to MET inhibitor, in MET-amplified SNU-5 gastric xenografts. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015;9:5697–5704. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S89410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dauffenbach L.M., Sia G.C., Cash P.A., Girees S.K., Lim R.S., Zheng J., Olsen E.P., Kerfoot C.A. Combination of PI3K and MEK inhibitor chemosensitivity in human tumor explants and cell lines using the Mosaic Blue assay and relationship to biomarkers by immunohistochemistry. Cancer Res. 2014;74:899. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-899. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hiromichi E., Corcoran R.B., Anurag S., Zhao C., Youngchul S., Eugene L., Ryan D.P., Meyerhardt J.A., Cyril B., Jeffrey S. Receptor tyrosine kinases exert dominant control over PI3K signaling in human KRAS mutant colorectal cancers. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:4311–4321. doi: 10.1172/JCI57909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leiser D., Medová M., Mikami K., Nisa L., Stroka D., Blaukat A., Bladt F., Aebersold D.M., Zimmer Y. KRAS and HRAS mutations confer resistance to MET targeting in preclinical models of MET-expressing tumor cells. Mol. Oncol. 2015;9:1434–1446. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sugano T., Seike M., Noro R., Soeno C., Chiba M., Zou F., Nakamichi S., Nishijima N., Matsumoto M., Miyanaga A. Inhibition of ABCB1 Overcomes Cancer Stem Cell-like Properties and Acquired Resistance to MET Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2433–2440. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fan Y.H., Li W., Liu D.D., Bai M.X., Song H.R., Xu Y.N., Lee S.K., Zhou Z.P., Wang J., Ding H.W. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 3-substituted imidazo[1,2- a ]pyridine and quinazolin-4(3H)-one derivatives as PI3Kα inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017;139:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.07.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Heavey S., Cuffe S., Finn S., Young V., Ryan R., Nicholson S., Leonard N., Mcveigh N., Barr M., O’Byrne K. In pursuit of synergy: An investigation of the PI3K/mTOR/MEK co-targeted inhibition strategy in NSCLC. Oncotarget. 2016;7:79526–79543. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gimenez Xavier P., Pros E., Bonastre E., Moran S., Aza A., Graña O., Gomez Lopez G., Derdak S., Dabad M., Esteve Codina A., et al. Genomic and Molecular Screenings Identify Different Mechanisms for Acquired Resistance to MET Inhibitors in Lung Cancer Cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017;16:1366–1376. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Padda S., Neal J.W., Wakelee H.A. MET inhibitors in combination with other therapies in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2012;1:238–253. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2012.10.08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim J.Y., Welsh E.A., Fang B., Bai Y., Kinose F., Eschrich S.A., Koomen J.M., Haura E.B. Phosphoproteomics reveals MAPK inhibitors enhance MET- and EGFR-driven AKT signaling in KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. Mcr. 2016;14:1019–1029. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Organ S.L. C-met and Kras: Signalling and Clinical Implications in Colorectal Cancer. School of Graduate Studies-Theses. [(accessed on 4 May 2019)];2014 Available online: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/43691/1/Organ_Shawna_L_201311_PhD_thesis.pdf.
- 28.Yingbo L., Jinxi W., Xing G., Weihua H., Yongxiang Z., Huan X., Chuanling Z., Qiuchen H., Lihe Z., Zhongxin L. c-Met targeting enhances the effect of irradiation and chemical agents against malignant colon cells harboring a KRAS mutation. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e113186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eberlein C.A., Daniel S., Markovets A.A., Al-Kadhimi K.J., Zhongwu L., Fisher P.R., Meador C.B., Paula S., Eiki I., Ross S.J. Acquired Resistance to the Mutant-Selective EGFR Inhibitor AZD9291 Is Associated with Increased Dependence on RAS Signaling in Preclinical Models. Cancer Res. 2015;75:2489–2500. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sun M.L., Syn N.L., Cho B.C., Soo R.A. Acquired resistance to EGFR targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018;65:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Booth L., Roberts J.L., Tavallai M., Webb T., Leon D., Chen J., Mcguire W.P., Poklepovic A., Dent P. The afatinib resistance of in vivo generated H1975 lung cancer cell clones is mediated by SRC/ERBB3/c-KIT/c-MET compensatory survival signaling. Oncotarget. 2016;7:19620–19630. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li Y., Guessous F., Dipierro C., Zhang Y., Mudrick T. Interactions between PTEN and the c-Met pathway in glioblastoma and implications for therapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009;8:376–385. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhao B.X., Wang J., Song B., Wei H., Lv W.P., Tian L.M., Li M., Lv S. Establishment and biological characteristics of acquired gefitinib resistance in cell line NCI-H1975/gefinitib-resistant with epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015;11:2767–2774. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.3058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tong C.W.S., Wu W.K.K., Loong H.H.F., Cho W.C.S., To K.K.W. Drug combination approach to overcome resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2017;405:100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schrank Z., Chhabra G., Lin L., Iderzorig T., Osude C., Khan N., Kuckovic A., Singh S., Miller R., Puri N. Current Molecular-Targeted Therapies in NSCLC and Their Mechanism of Resistance. Cancers. 2018;10:E224. doi: 10.3390/cancers10070224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goodwin C.R., Lal B., Ho S., Woodard C.L., Zhou X., Taeger A., Xia S., Laterra J. PTEN reconstitution alters glioma responses to c-Met pathway inhibition. Anti-cancer drugs. 2011;22:905–912. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283484750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Awad M.M. Impaired c-Met Receptor Degradation Mediated by MET Exon 14 Mutations in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:879–881. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Abounader R., Reznik T., Martinez-Murillo C.F., Rosen E.M., Laterra J. Regulation of c-Met-dependent gene expression by PTEN. Oncogene. 2004;23:9173–9182. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shen J., Sheng X., Chang Z., Wu Q., Wang S., Xuan Z., Li D., Wu Y., Shang Y., Kong X., et al. Iron metabolism regulates p53 signaling through direct heme-p53 interaction and modulation of p53 localization, stability, and function. Cell Rep. 2014;7:180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Song J., Kwon Y., Kim S., Lee S.K. Antitumor activity of phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids is associated with negative regulation of Met endosomal signaling in renal cancer cells. Chem. Biol. 2015;22:504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fan Y.H., Lu H.Y., Ma H.D., Feng F., Hu X.L., Zhang Q., Zhao Q.C. Bioactive compounds of Eriocaulon sieboldianum blocking proliferation and inducing apoptosis of HepG2 cells might be involved in Aurora kinase inhibition. Food Funct. 2015;6:3746–3759. doi: 10.1039/C5FO00371G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fan Y.H., Ding H.W., Liu D.D., Song H.R., Xu Y.N., Wang J. Novel 4-aminoquinazoline derivatives induce growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via PI3Kα inhibition. Bioorgan Med. Chem. 2018;26:1675–1685. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]