Abstract
The fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene is a significant genetic contributor to polygenic obesity. We investigated whether physical activity (PA) modulates the effect of FTO rs3751812 on body mass index (BMI) among Taiwanese adults. Analytic samples included 10,853 Taiwan biobank participants. Association of the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with BMI was assessed using linear regression models. Physical activity was defined as any kind of exercise lasting 30 min each session, at least three times a week. Participants with heterozygous (TG) and homozygous (TT) genotypes had higher BMI compared to those with wild-type (GG) genotypes. The β value was 0.381(p < 0.0001) for TG individuals and 0.684 (p = 0.0204) for TT individuals. There was a significant dose-response effect among carriers of different risk alleles (p trend <0.0001). Active individuals had lower BMI than their inactive counterparts (β = −0.389, p < 0.0001). Among the active individuals, significant associations were found only with the TG genotype (β = 0.360, p = 0.0032). Inactive individuals with TG and TT genotypes had increased levels of BMI compared to those with GG genotypes: Their β values were 0.381 (p = 0.0021) and 0.950 (p = 0.0188), respectively. There was an interaction between the three genotypes, physical inactivity, and BMI (p trend = 0.0002). Our data indicated that increased BMI owing to genetic susceptibility by FTO rs3751812 may be reduced by physical activity.
Keywords: body mass index, Taiwan biobank, obesity, physical exercise
1. Introduction
Obesity is a global public health issue associated with an unhealthy lifestyle and genetic factors. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 1.9 billion adults are either overweight or obese [1]. Based on criteria established by the Department of Health in Taiwan, a body mass index (BMI) of 24–26.9 kg/m2 indicates overweight while BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2 indicates obesity. Results from the 1993–1996 and 2005–2008 Nutrition and Health Surveys showed an increased prevalence of obesity and overweight among Taiwanese individuals (that is, 33.4–51% in men and 33.5–35.9% in women) [2]. About 17.1% of children and adolescents in the United States were overweight, while 32.2% of adults were obese in 2003–2004 [3]. The etiology of obesity is complex and multifactorial, involving genetic background, hormones, and lifestyle and environmental issues [4].
The fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene variants rs1121980, rs17817449, rs8050136, rs9935401, rs3751812, rs9939609, rs9930506, and rs9922708 were previously associated with obesity [5,6]. Several other variants have been associated with obesity risk in different population and age groups [7,8,9,10,11]. The role played by FTO and other obesity-related genes in the etiology of obesity has been reported [12]. The mechanisms responsible for the effect of the FTO gene on obesity remain unknown [13]. Multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the first intron of the FTO gene have been associated with BMI [14]. Because the intron lacks protein-altering variants and the biological pathways involved are not well-known, several studies have provided a candidate mechanism of obesity and FTO [15,16,17,18,19].
Physical activity (PA) prevents obesity in many ways. Several studies have associated the FTO gene with PA. In one of its variants, rs1477196, the C allele has been associated with a 1.22 increase in BMI among Old Order Amish (OOA) individuals who were engaged in low levels of physical activity [20]. However, only a 0.27 increase was noted in people who were engaged in high levels of physical activity. In the same study, the difference in BMI across rs1861868 genotypes was large in less physically active individuals but was small (although not significant) in the more physically active individuals. In another study, A-allele homozygotes who were physically inactive had a 1.95 increase in BMI compared with T-allele homozygotes [21].
The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk Study also confirmed that physical activity attenuated the effect of rs1121980 on BMI. However, in the physically active group, the risk allele increased BMI by 0.25 per allele. The increase was significantly more pronounced in inactive individuals (0.44 per risk allele) [22]. However, other studies found no interaction between BMI and physical activity [23,24,25].
Based on previous studies, FTO gene effects on obesity may be modified by physical activity [26,27]. In Taiwan, obesity (defined by a BMI at or greater than 27 kg/m2) is a serious health issue. How physical activity modulates the BMI-increasing influence of FTO variants in Asian populations is not well-understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the role PA plays in modifying the effect of FTO variants on BMI. We hypothesized that increased BMI due to genetic susceptibility by an FTO variant (rs3751812) may be attenuated by physical activity.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants and Measurements
Study data were obtained from Taiwan biobank, a national large-scale data source with genetic and demographic data from Taiwanese individuals between the ages of 30 and 70. Initially, data were collected from 10,853 participants. After excluding those with incomplete information (n = 21), the final enrollment included 10,832 participants. Anthropometric measures included body weight and height (measured in accordance with the standard procedures), as well as BMI (weight/height2). Other variables included age, sex, physical activity/inactivity, total cholesterol, smoking (defined as never/former and current smoking), alcohol consumption (defined as weekly drinking of at least 150 cc of alcohol continuously for 6 months), vegetarian diet (defined as never/former and current vegetarian), coffee intake (that is, more than three times per week), and tea consumption (more than one time per day). Physical activity was defined as any kind of exercise lasting 30 min each session, at least three times a week. All study participants provided written informed consent, according to protocols approved by the institutional review board. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The Institutional Review Board of Chung Shan Medical University approved this study (CS2-16114, 18 October 2016).
2.2. Genotyping
Eight SNPs in the FTO gene that have been consistently associated with obesity in European populations were selected. The source of SNPs was the human genome database (accessed at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/guide/human/), which contains findings from international research programs, such as the HapMap and 1000 Genomes Projects. Included in our analysis were the following variants: rs1121980, rs17817449, rs8050136, rs9935401, rs3751812, rs9939609, rs9930506, and rs9922708. SNPs were excluded if their minor allele frequencies (MAFs) were less than 0.01, or call rates less than 98%. Also excluded were SNPs that were not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. In the final model, one tagging SNP (rs3751812) was selected for genotyping.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
All analyses were conducted using SAS 9.3 statistical software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The Χ2 test was used to compare the differences between the three genotypes. Data were expressed as X ± standard error (S.E.) and %. Multicollinearity was measured using the variance inflation factor (VIF). Values that exceeded 10 suggested multicollinearity. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested for each SNP using a 1 degree of freedom χ2-test. LD and its correlation coefficients (D values) were calculated using the Haploview software. Linear regression models were used to test the association between the tag-SNP and BMI. Adjustments were made for potential confounding variables (age, sex, physical activity, alcohol drinking, smoking, total cholesterol, tea consumption, coffee consumption, and vegetarian diets). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Demographic characteristics of participants are shown in Table 1. Among individuals with the FTO rs3751812 variant, 168 (1.55%) were homozygous (TT), 2343 (21.63%) were heterozygous (TG), and 8321 (76.82%) were wild-type (GG). The mean BMI was 25.21 ± 0.26 kg/m2 for TT carriers, 24.58 ± 0.08 kg/m2 for TG carriers, and 24.27 ± 0.04 kg/m2 for GG carriers. There were more women with GG and TG genotypes than men (that is 51.91% versus 48.06% for GG and 52.80% versus 47.20% for TG genotype) except for those with the TT genotype (that is 39.88% versus 60.12%). Fasting blood glucose levels differed significantly across genotypes (p = 0.0398). However, values were within normal ranges. Other variables did not differ significantly across genotypes. Table 2 shows the demographic and lifestyle variables of study participants based on physical exercise. Among physically active individuals, 66 (1.49%) were homozygous (TT), 975 (22.07%) were heterozygous (TG), and 3376 (76.43%) were wild-type (GG). Likewise, among their inactive counterparts, 102 (1.59%) were homozygous (TT), 1368 (21.33%) were heterozygous (TG), and 4944 (77.08%) were wild-type (GG). There were no significant differences between physically active and inactive participants based on genotype distributions (p = 0.6154). Fasting glucose and total cholesterol differed among physically active and inactive individuals though values were within normal ranges. Table 3 shows the association between rs3751812 and BMI. After adjusting for potential confounders, individuals with TG and TT genotypes exhibited higher BMI compared to those with GG genotypes. Their β values were β = 0.381 (p < 0.0001) and 0.684 (p = 0.0204), respectively. BMI significantly increased with an increase in the number of risk alleles (p trend <0.0001). In addition, active individuals had a lower BMI than their inactive counterparts (β = −0.389, p < 0.0001). Table 4 shows the association of analyzed variables with BMI in groups with different genotypes. Decreased BMI was associated with GG (β = −0.368, p < 0.0001) and TG (β = −0.414, p = 0.0175) carriers who were physically active compared to their physically inactive counterparts. However, the decreased BMI in TT carriers was not significant (β = −1.059, p = 0.1099). This may have been due to the small sample size.
Table 1.
Parameters | Total | GG (n = 8321) | TG (n = 2343) | TT (n = 168) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 48.68 ± 0.11 | 48.64 ± 0.12 | 48.78 ± 0.23 | 49.13 ± 0.90 | 0.7433 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 24.35 ± 0.03 | 24.27 ± 0.04 | 24.58 ± 0.08 | 25.21 ± 0.26 | <0.0001 |
Fasting blood glucose(mg/dl) | 96.49 ± 0.20 | 96.36 ± 0.23 | 96.69 ± 0.43 | 100.43 ± 2.18 | 0.0398 |
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 193.76 ± 0.34 | 193.93 ± 0.39 | 193.10 ± 0.74 | 194.58 ± 2.43 | 0.5763 |
Sex (n, %) | |||||
Male | 5219 (48.09) | 4002 (48.06) | 1106 (47.20) | 101 (60.12) | 0.0053 |
Female | 5634 (51.91) | 4319 (51.90) | 1237 (52.80) | 67 (39.88) | |
Alcohol intake | |||||
Never/Former | 9992 (92.08) | 7641 (91.84) | 2180 (93.04) | 151 (89.88) | 0.0930 |
Current | 860 (7.92) | 679 (8.16) | 163 (6.96) | 17 (10.12) | |
Smoking | |||||
No | 7451 (68.70) | 5743 (69.50) | 1583 (67.65) | 111 (66.07) | 0.3299 |
Yes | 3395 (31.30) | 2574 (30.95) | 757 (32.35) | 57 (33.93) | |
Physical activity | |||||
No | 6426 (59.21) | 4944 (59.42) | 1368 (58.39) | 102 (60.71) | 0.6154 |
Yes | 4426 (40.79) | 3376 (40.58) | 975 (41.61) | 66 (39.29) | |
Tea consumption | |||||
No 5655 (63.06) | 4353 (63.26) | 1213 (62.82) | 78 (56.52) | 0.2591 | |
Yes | 3312 (36.94) | 2528 (36.74) | 718 (37.18) | 60 (43.48) | |
Coffee consumption | |||||
No | 6086 (67.87) | 4668 (67.84) | 1320 (68.36) | 84 (60.87) | 0.1910 |
Yes | 2881 (32.13) | 2213 (32.16) | 611 (31.64) | 54 (39.13) | |
Vegetarian Diet | |||||
Never/Former | 8551 (95.36) | 6570 (95.48) | 1836 (95.08) | 129 (93.48) | 0.4335 |
Current | 416 (4.64) | 311 (4.52) | 95 (4.92) | 9 (6.52) |
All variables are presented as mean ± standard error (S.E.) (continuous variables) or numbers (%). BMI: body mass index, GG: wild-type, TG: heterozygous; TT: homozygous.
Table 2.
Parameters | Physically Active (n = 4426) | Physically Inactive (n = 6426) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
rs3751812 (n, %) | |||
GG | 3376 (76.43) | 4944 (77.08) | 0.6154 |
TG | 975 (22.07) | 1368 (21.33) | |
TT | 66 (1.49) | 102 (1.59) | |
Age (years) | 53.36 ± 0.15 | 45.45 ± 0.13 | <0.0001 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 24.24 ± 0.05 | 24.42 ± 0.05 | 0.0083 |
Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 97.93 ± 0.32 | 95.50 ± 0.26 | <0.0001 |
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 195.68 ± 0.53 | 192.44 ± 0.45 | <0.0001 |
Sex (n, %) | |||
Male | 2158 (48.76) | 3061 (47.63) | 0.2500 |
Female | 2268 (51.24) | 3365 (52.37) | |
Alcohol drinking | |||
Never/Former | 4080 (92.18) | 5911 (92.00) | 0.7294 |
Current | 346 (7.82) | 514 (8.00) | |
Smoking | |||
No | 3144 (71.05) | 4306 (67.07) | <0.0001 |
Yes | 1281 (28.95) | 2114 (32.93) | |
Tea consumption | |||
No | 2340 (62.37) | 3315 (63.57) | 0.2455 |
Yes | 1412 (37.63) | 1900 (36.43) | |
Coffee consumption | |||
No | 2581 (68.79) | 3505 (67.21) | 0.1140 |
Yes | 1171 (31.21) | 1710 (32.79) | |
Vegetarian diet | |||
Never/Former | 3598 (95.90) | 4953 (94.98) | 0.0411 |
Current | 154 (4.10) | 262 (5.02) |
Table 3.
β | p-Value | |
---|---|---|
rs3751812 | ||
GG | - | |
TG | 0.381 | <0.0001 |
TT | 0.684 | 0.0204 |
p for trend < 0.0001 | ||
Physical activity | −0.389 | <0.0001 |
Sex | 1.384 | <0.0001 |
Age | 0.020 | <0.0001 |
Total cholesterol | 0.008 | <0.0001 |
Alcohol intake | 0.092 | 0.5267 |
Smoking | 0.501 | <0.0001 |
Tea consumption | 0.492 | <0.0001 |
Coffee consumption | 0.108 | 0.1723 |
Vegetarian diet | −0.343 | 0.0493 |
β: beta coefficient.
Table 4.
GG | TG | TT | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p-Value | β | p-Value | β | p-Value | |
Physical activity | −0.368 | <0.0001 | −0.414 | 0.0175 | −1.059 | 0.1099 |
Sex | 1.461 | <0.0001 | 1.196 | <0.0001 | 0.850 | 0.1984 |
Age | 0.019 | <0.0001 | 0.026 | 0.0013 | 0.014 | 0.6146 |
Total cholesterol | 0.008 | <0.0001 | 0.008 | 0.0003 | 0.004 | 0.6724 |
Alcohol intake | 0.060 | 0.7148 | −0.008 | 0.9819 | 2.065 | 0.0337 |
Smoking | 0.387 | 0.0003 | 0.860 | <0.0001 | 0.885 | 0.2209 |
Tea consumption | 0.488 | <0.0001 | 0.516 | 0.0031 | 0.499 | 0.3737 |
Coffee consumption | 0.212 | 0.0179 | −0.215 | 0.2260 | −0.641 | 0.2823 |
Vegetarian diet | −0.516 | 0.0098 | 0.166 | 0.6626 | 0.401 | 0.7291 |
Table 5 shows the association between rs3751812 and BMI based on exercise status. Among physically active individuals, the TG genotype was significantly associated with increased BMI (β = 0.360, p = 0.0032). However, the effect of the TT genotype on BMI was not significant (β = 0.245, p = 0.5606). Among physically inactive individuals, both TG (β = 0.381, p = 0.0021) and TT (β = 0.95036, p = 0.0188) were significantly associated with increased BMI (p trend = 0.0002). However, no dose-related trend was observed among physically active individuals.
Table 5.
Physical Activity | Physical Inactivity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
β | p-Value | β- | p-Value | |
rs3751812 | ||||
GG | - | - | - | - |
TG | 0.360 | 0.0032 | 0.381 | 0.0021 |
TT | 0.245 | 0.5606 | 0.950 | 0.0188 |
p trend = 0.0002 | ||||
Sex | 1.150 | <0.0001 | 1.517 | <0.0001 |
Age | 0.006 | 0.2077 | 0.030 | <0.0001 |
Total cholesterol | 0.003 | 0.0741 | 0.011 | <0.0001 |
Alcohol drinking | 0.460 | 0.0241 | −0.192 | 0.3374 |
Smoking | 0.439 | 0.0012 | 0.514 | <0.0001 |
Tea consumption | 0.565 | <0.0001 | 0.417 | 0.0001 |
Coffee consumption | 0.270 | 0.0150 | −0.017 | 0.8746 |
Vegetarian diet | −0.626 | 0.0152 | −0.224 | 0.3401 |
β: beta coefficient.
4. Discussion
In the current study, we found that there was an association between FTO SNP (rs3751812) and BMI among Taiwanese adults. Compared with the GG genotype, carriers of the TT genotype had a higher BMI than those with the GT genotype. Similar findings were reported among the Han Chinese, where increased mean values of BMI were seen among GT + TT than GG carriers [28]. In addition, we found that the effect on BMI was in an allele-dose-dependent manner (p trend < 0.0001).
After stratification, we found that physical activity was significantly associated with a decreased BMI. The decrease was significant in carriers of GG and TG genotypes. Carriers of the TT genotype also exhibited decreased BMI even though the effect was not significant. Latinos with TT alleles (considered as carriers of two risk alleles) who were engaged in regular PA exhibited significant reductions in BMI [26].
Efforts have been made to understand the biological mechanisms underlying body weight regulation: SNPs in FTO are believed to be associated with obesity through an effect on RPGRIP1L [29]. Reports from another study indicated that RPGRIP1L may be partly or exclusively responsible for the obesity susceptibility signal at the FTO locus [16]. It has also been suggested that the homeobox gene Iroquois homeobox 3 (IRX3) is a functional long-range target of obesity-associated variants within FTO [17].
Genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors affect body mass index. Such variables as tea, coffee, and cholesterol were included in the current study to understand their modulating role on BMI. These variables were selected based on previous associations with obesity. Findings from a previous study showed that the risk of hypercholesterolaemia was modified by BMI in adults aged 25–39 years [30]. Unlike green tea, coffee consumption has been strongly associated with a higher blood cholesterol and BMI [31]. Findings from another study showed that higher coffee drinking attenuated genetic associations with BMI and obesity [32]. Further analysis of our data showed that vegetarian diet was associated with a lower BMI mainly among participants with the GG genotype, as well those that were physically active.
To our knowledge, studies investigating the interactive influence of genes and physical activity have focused on populations other than Asians [26,27,33]. Associations between FTO variants with obesity risk (measured by BMI) have not been widely investigated in Taiwan. Therefore, our findings are relevant and may serve as a reference for future studies.
Recent studies have also examined the interactive influence of FTO variants and lifestyle factors on obesity risk. Lower levels of BMI have been reported among smokers compared to nonsmokers [34,35]. However, we observed a significant association between smoking and increased BMI (β = 0.501, p < 0.0021). This may be associated with other health risks in individuals engaged in heavy smoking. There was no significant association between alcohol intake and BMI. After our stratified analysis, coffee consumers who were engaged in physical activity exhibited increased BMI. Lower levels were observed among consumers that were inactive, though not significant. In addition, we found that vegetarian diet was associated with a decreased BMI. Contrasting results have been reported. According to a study conducted in North America, the mean BMI was lowest in vegans (23.6 kg/m2) and was incrementally higher in lacto-ovo vegetarians (25.7 kg/m2), pesco-vegetarians (26.3 kg/m2), semi-vegetarians (27.3 kg/m2), and nonvegetarians (28.8 kg/m2) [36]. Our data suggested that BMI is associated with physical activity and FTO rs3751812 variants in Taiwanese individuals. The strength of the study included the use of a large-scale data source with genetic and demographic information. In addition, we included information on smoking and drinking habits. However, the study is limited in that we did not consider the gene–gene interaction and the effect on BMI.
In conclusion, our study validated the association between an FTO variant and BMI in Taiwanese individuals. In addition, individuals with TG and TT genotypes who were physically active had a decreased BMI. These results indicate that physical activity might be necessary to mitigate the deleterious effect of BMI among genetically susceptible Taiwanese individuals.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.-C.L., Y.-P.L., and T.-H.L.; Formal analysis, Y.-C.L. and Y.-P.L.; Investigation, T.-H.L.; Methodology, Y.-C.L., Y.-P.L., and T.-H.L.; Resources, T.-H.L.; Supervision, T.-H.L.; Writing—original draft, Y.-C.L.; Writing—review & editing, Y.-P.L. and T.-H.L.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 105-2627-M-040-002).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Organization W.H. Obesity and Overweight: Fact Sheet N 311. [(accessed on 1 March 2018)];2015 Available online: http://www who int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en.
- 2.Pan W.H., Wu H.J., Yeh C.J., Chuang H.Y., Yeh N.H., Hsieh Y.T. Diet and Health Trends in Taiwan: Comparison of Two Nutrition and Health Surveys from 1993–1996 and 2005–2008. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011;20:238–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oqden C.L., Carroll M.D., Curtin L.R., McDowell M.A., Tabak C.J., Fleqal K.M. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295:1549–1555. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chan R.S., Woo J. Prevention of Overweight and Obesity: How Effective is the Current Public Health Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2010;7:765–783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7030765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Saldaña-Alvarez Y., Salas-Martínez M.G., García-Ortiz H., Luckie-Duque A., García-Cárdenas G., Vicenteño-Ayala H., Cordova E.J., Esparza-Aguilar M., Contreras-Cubas C., Carnevale A., et al. Gender-Dependent Association of FTO Polymorphisms with Body Mass Index in Mexicans. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0145984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Consortium W.T.C.C. Genome-Wide Association Study of 14,000 Cases of Seven Common Diseases and 3000 Shared Controls. Nature. 2007;447:661–678. doi: 10.1038/nature05911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berulava T., Horsthemke B. The Obesity-Associated SNPs in Intron 1 of the FTO Gene Affect Primary Transcript Levels. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;18:1054–1056. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hertel J.K., Johansson S., Raeder H., Midthjell K., Lyssenko V., Groop L., Molven A., Njølstad P.R. Genetic Analysis of Recently Identified Type 2 Diabetes Loci in 1,638 Unselected Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and 1,858 Control Participants from a Norwegian Population-Based Cohort (the HUNT Study) Diabetologia. 2008;51:971–977. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-0982-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hotta K., Nakata Y., Matsuo T., Kamohara S., Kotani K., Komatsu R., Itoh N., Mineo I., Wada J., Masuzaki H., et al. Variations in the FTO Gene are Associated with Severe Obesity in the Japanese. J. Hum. Genet. 2008;53:546–553. doi: 10.1007/s10038-008-0283-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Villalobos-Comparán M., Flores-Dorantes M.T., Villarreal-Molina M.T., Rodríguez-Cruz M., García-Ulloa A.C., Robles L., Huertas-Vázquez A., Saucedo-Villarreal N., López-Alarcón M., Sánchez-Muñoz F., et al. The FTO Gene is Associated with Adulthood Obesity in the Mexican Population. Obesity. 2008;16:2296–2301. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu G., Zhu H., Lagou V., Gutin B., Stallmann-Jorgensen I.S., Treiber F.A., Dong Y., Snieder H. FTO Variant Rs9939609 is Associated with Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference, but not with Energy Intake or Physical Activity in European-And African-American Youth. BMC Med. Genet. 2010;11:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-11-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Speliotes E.K., Willer C.J., Berndt S.I., Monda K.L., Thorleifsson G., Jackson A.U., Lango Allen H., Lindgren C.M., Luan J., Mägi R., et al. Association Analyses of 249,796 Individuals Reveal 18 New Loci Associated with Body Mass Index. Nat. Genet. 2010;42:937–948. doi: 10.1038/ng.686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao X., Yang Y., Sun B.-F., Zhao Y.-L., Yang Y.-G. FTO and Obesity: Mechanisms of Association. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2014;14:486. doi: 10.1007/s11892-014-0486-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yeo G.S., O’Rahilly S. Uncovering the Biology of FTO. Mol. Metab. 2012;1:32–36. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fischer J., Koch L., Emmerling C., Vierkotten J., Peters T., Brüning J.C., Rüther U. Inactivation of the FTO Gene Protects from Obesity. Nature. 2009;458:894–898. doi: 10.1038/nature07848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stratigopoulos G., Carli J.F.M., O’Day D.R., Wang L., Leduc C.A., Lanzano P., Chung W.K., Rosenbaum M., Egli D., Doherty D.A., et al. Hypomorphism for RPGRIP1L, a Ciliary Gene Vicinal to the FTO Locus, Causes Increased Adiposity in Mice. Cell Metab. 2014;19:767–779. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Smemo S., Tena J.J., Kim K.-H., Gamazon E.R., Sakabe N.J., Gómez-Marín C., Aneas I., Credidio F.L., Sobreira D.R., Wasserman N.F., et al. Obesity-Associated Variants within FTO form Long-Range Functional Connections with IRX3. Nature. 2014;507:371–375. doi: 10.1038/nature13138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ragvina A., Moroc E., Fredmand D., Navratilova P., Drivenes Ø., Engström P.G., Alonso M.E., de la Calle Mustienes E., Gómez Skarmeta J.L., Tavares M.J., et al. Long-Range Gene Regulation Links Genomic Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity Risk Regions to HHEX, SOX4, and IRX3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:775–780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911591107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jowett J.B., Curran J.E., Johnson M.P., Carless M.A., Göring H.H.H., Dyer T.D., Cole S.A., Comuzzie A.G., MacCluer J.W., Moses E.K., et al. Genetic Variation at the FTO Locus Influences RBL2 Gene Expression. Diabetes. 2010;59:726–732. doi: 10.2337/db09-1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rampersaud E., Mitchell B.D., Pollin T.I., Fu M., Shen H., O’Connell J.R., Ducharme J.L., Hines S., Sack P., Naglieri R., et al. Physical Activity and the Association of Common FTO Gene Variants with Body Mass Index and Obesity. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008;168:1791–1797. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Andreasen C.H., Stender-Petersen K.L., Mogensen M.S., Torekov S.S., Wegner L., Andersen G., Nielsen A.L., Albrechtsen A., Borch-Johnsen K., Rasmussen S.S., et al. Low Physical Activity Accentuates the Effect of the FTO Rs9939609 Polymorphism on Body Fat Accumulation. Diabetes. 2008;57:95–101. doi: 10.2337/db07-0910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vimaleswaran K.S., Li S., Zhao J.H., Luan J.A., Bingham S., Khaw K.-T., Ekelund U., Wareham N.J., Loos R.J. Physical Activity Attenuates the Body Mass Index–Increasing Influence of Genetic Variation in the FTO Gene. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009;90:425–428. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tan J.T., Dorajoo R., Seielstad M., Sim X.L., Ong R.T.-H., Chia K.S., Wong T.Y., Saw S.M., Chew S.K., Aung T., et al. FTO Variants Are Associated with Obesity in the Chinese and Malay Populations in Singapore. Diabetes. 2008;57:2851–2857. doi: 10.2337/db08-0214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jónsson Á., Renström F., Lyssenko V., Brito E.C., Isomaa B., Berglund G., Nilsson P.M., Groop L., Franks P.W. Assessing the Effect of Interaction between an FTO Variant (Rs9939609) and Physical Activity on Obesity in 15,925 Swedish and 2,511 Finnish adults. Diabetologia. 2009;52:1334–1338. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1355-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Harbron J., Van Der Merwe L., Zaahl M.G., Kotze M.J., Senekal M. Fat Mass and Obesity-Associated (FTO) Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Physical Activity, Food Intake, Eating Behaviors, Psychological Health, and Modeled Change in Body Mass Index in Overweight/Obese Caucasian Adults. Nutrients. 2014;6:3130–3152. doi: 10.3390/nu6083130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim J.Y., DeMenna J.T., Puppala S., Chittoor G., Schneider J., Duggirala R., Mandarino L.J., Shaibi G.Q., Coletta D.K. Physical Activity and FTO Genotype by Physical Activity Interactive Influences on Obesity. BMC Genet. 2016;17:1549. doi: 10.1186/s12863-016-0357-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kilpeläinen T.O., Qi L., Brage S., Sharp S.J., Sonestedt E., Demerath E., Ahmad T., Mora S., Kaakinen M., Sandholt C.H., et al. Physical Activity Attenuates the Influence of FTO Variants on Obesity Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 218,166 Adults and 19,268 Children. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wu J., Xu J., Zhang Z., Ren J., Li Y., Wang J., Cao Y., Rong F., Zhao R., Huang X., et al. Association of FTO Polymorphisms with Obesity and Metabolic Parameters in Han Chinese Adolescents. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fawcett K.A., Barroso I. The Genetics of Obesity: FTO Leads the Way. Trends Genet. 2010;26:266–274. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gostynski M., Gutzwiller F., Kuulasmaa K., Döring A., Ferrario M., Grafnetter D., Pajak A. Analysis of the Relationship between Total Cholesterol, Age, Body Mass Index among Males and Females in the WHO MONICA Project. Int. J. Obes. 2004;28:1082–1090. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Walli R.R., Almosrati R.A., Zaied A.A., Shummakhi F.M.E., Bredae E.G., Shalaka O.K. The Relationship between Habitual Coffee and Tea Consumption and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus among Libyan Adults. Int. J. Pharma Res. Rev. 2015;4:34–39. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang T., Huang T., Kang J.H., Zheng Y., Jensen M.K., Wiggs J.L., Pasquale L.R., Fuchs C.S., Campos H., Rimm E.B., et al. Habitual Coffee Consumption and Genetic Predisposition to Obesity: Gene-Diet Interaction Analyses in Three US Prospective Studies. BMC Med. 2017;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0862-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ahmad S., Rukh G., Varga T.V., Ali A., Kurbasic A., Shungin D., Ericson U., Koivula R.W., Chu A.Y., Rose L.M., et al. Gene × Physical Activity Interactions in Obesity: Combined Analysis of 111,421 Individuals of European Ancestry. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Plurphanswat N., Rodu B. The Association of Smoking and Demographic Characteristics on Body Mass Index and Obesity among Adults in the U.S., 1999–2012. BMC Obes. 2014;1:18. doi: 10.1186/s40608-014-0018-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chiolero A., Faeh D., Paccaud F., Cornuz J. Consequences of Smoking for Body Weight, Body Fat Distribution, and Insulin Resistance. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:801–809. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.4.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tonstad S., Butler T., Yan R., Fraser G.E. Type of Vegetarian Diet, Body Weight, and Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:791–796. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]