Skip to main content
Pharmacogenomics logoLink to Pharmacogenomics
. 2018 Oct 16;19(16):1235–1249. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2018-0106

RYR1 and CACNA1S genetic variants identified with statin-associated muscle symptoms

Paul J Isackson 1,1,*, Jianxin Wang 2,2, Mohammad Zia 2,2, Paul Spurgeon 2,2, Adrian Levesque 2,2, Jonathan Bard 2,2, Smitha James 3,3, Norma Nowak 3,3,4,4, Tae Keun Lee 1,1, Georgirene D Vladutiu 1,1,5,5
PMCID: PMC6563124  PMID: 30325262

Abstract

Aim:

To examine the genetic differences between subjects with statin-associated muscle symptoms and statin-tolerant controls.

Materials & methods:

Next-generation sequencing was used to characterize the exomes of 76 subjects with severe statin-associated muscle symptoms and 50 statin-tolerant controls.

Results:

12 probably pathogenic variants were found within the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes in 16% of cases with severe statin-induced myopathy representing a fourfold increase over variants found in statin-tolerant controls. Subjects with probably pathogenic RYR1 or CACNA1S variants had plasma CK 5X to more than 400X the upper limit of normal in addition to having muscle symptoms.

Conclusions:

Genetic variants within the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes are likely to be a major contributor to the susceptibility to statin-associated muscle symptoms.

Keywords: : exome sequencing, malignant hyperthermia, myopathy, RYR1, statin


Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) occur in 10 [1] to 25% [2] of patients taking statins. Severe muscle symptoms induced by statin therapy occur in a small percentage of patients 0.1–0.5% [3]. Although genetic association studies have identified some possibly associated gene loci [4–7], these have not been reproducible in additional studies with independent patient cohorts [8,9]. The SLC1OB1 variant, in particular, has only been found to be associated with SAMS in patients with high dose simvastatin and not consistently associated with different statins or lower doses of simvastatin [10,11].

A more reasonable explanation for susceptibility to SAMS is the presence of rare pathogenic variants in genes important for skeletal muscle structure and function. In support of this, an increased incidence of pathogenic variants in the CPT2 and PYGM genes causing metabolic myopathies has been reported in patients with SAMS [12]. There are a number of genes associated with metabolic myopathies triggered by various factors such as extreme exercise, fasting, extremes in temperature, flu and exposure to volatile anesthetics [13]. In addition, many of the genes causing congenital myopathies, myofibrillar myopathies and muscular dystrophies have overlapping phenotypes with metabolic myopathies [14–16]. We propose that statins act as an additional trigger inducing muscle symptoms and a subset of patients with severe SAMS have causative genetic variants within genes associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) and congenital myopathy.

A patient with statin myopathy has been previously reported to have a variant in RYR1 known to be causative for MHS (Vladutiu 2011). Transgenic mice expressing RYR1 with a known MH associated variant were found to be more susceptible to adverse responses to simvastatin [17]. Genetic defects causative of MHS have only been found in RYR1, the α-1-subunit of the dihydropyridine-sensitive L-type voltage-dependent calcium channel (CACNA1S) [18] and STAC3 [19]. In addition to MHS, both RYR1 and CACNA1S have been associated with other myopathic conditions. Defects in the RYR1 gene are one of the most common causes of muscle disease [20] with a suspected prevalence of RYR1 gene causative variants in the general population of 1 in 2–3000 [21,22]. RYR1 variants have been classically associated with autosomal dominant forms of central core disease (CCD; MIM 117000) and MHS (MIM 145600) [23]. Further study and more extensive sequence analyses of the RYR1 gene has revealed the existence of autosomal recessive RYR1 variants associated with muscle disease as well [24–26]. A greater variability in phenotypes has been found including multi/minicore myopathies (MIM 255320 and 602771), King–Denborough syndrome, limb girdle myopathy, core-rod myopathy, bent spine myopathy, exertional [27], statin-induced [28] myopathies and asymptomatic CK elevation [29]. More recently, variants in the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes have been associated with exertional heat stroke (EHS) and a positive response to the in vitro contracture test [30,31]. EHS shares certain characteristics with MHS in that both are hypermetabolic states with elevated body temperature triggered by environmental stressors and resulting in increased cytoplasmic calcium; the phenotypes vary in that EHS results in neurological dysfunction leading to coma in severe cases while MHS is usually limited to myopathy.

In this study, we have sequenced the exomes of 76 cases with severe SAMS with abnormally elevated plasma creatine kinase (CK) and 50 statin-tolerant controls. We have analyzed the resultant data using a disease model in which rare pathogenic variants, possibly within multiple genes, are causative of SAMS. In this report, we describe variants in the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes. 12 probably pathogenic variants were detected in these genes in the SAMS cases and two were found in statin-tolerant controls. Additional probably pathogenic variants were also found in other muscle disease-associated genes in many of the SAMS cases with RYR1 or CACNA1S variants.

Methods

Study subjects

A total of 748 subjects (392 males) with a history of statin therapy were enrolled in a retrospective case–control study from five medical centers across the USA and Canada between 2004 and 2013 and representing 20 states and provinces in the USA and Canada. Collaborating institutions included the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center, MD, USA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, CA, USA; the Medical College of Wisconsin, WI, USA; McMaster University Medical Center; and the University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Tulsa, OK, USA. A standardized classification of SAMS integrates all muscle-related symptoms (e.g., pain, weakness or cramps) as ‘muscle symptoms’, which are then placed in subgroups depending on the presence or absence of elevated plasma CK. Pain and weakness in typical SAMS are usually symmetrical and proximal, and generally affect large muscle groups. The myalgias and weakness typically occur within 4–6 weeks after starting statin therapy, however, they may occur after many years of treatment [32]. The SAMS group was comprised of 634 individuals (340 males) and a statin-tolerant control group of 114 individuals (52 males) who continued to take statins for at least 12 months without muscle symptoms. Individuals were classified as having SAMS based on their responses to a questionnaire outlining the statin type and dosage that first led to myopathic symptoms, the date of onset of symptoms, the extent of muscle symptoms during therapy and the duration of symptoms post-cessation of statin therapy. Additional information was collected pertaining to personal or family history of heart disease, muscle disease and other co-existing medical conditions. Statin-tolerant controls completed a follow-up questionnaire 6 and 12 months post initial enrollment to confirm that statin tolerance was maintained. 26 subjects of Caucasian, Euro-American descent (19 males, mean age 57 years) of 634 individuals in the SAMS group were selected for whole exome sequencing (WES) using specific selection criteria. All had severe muscle pain and/or weakness attributed solely to statin therapy; plasma creatine kinase (CK) levels >5-times the upper limit of normal (ULN); and all were <65 years of age when muscle symptoms began. More than 70% had prolonged symptoms post therapy for at least 6 months. An additional 50 subjects (30 males); 81% Caucasian; 4% Asian; 15% African–American (mean age: 62 years) with severe SAMS were chosen for whole genome sequencing (WGS). These were selected primarily based on severity of muscle symptoms and a plasma CK level >5X ULN. One subject did not have muscle symptoms but had a CK level of 12X ULN and was included. DNA from 50 subjects (20 males, mean age: 63 years, 100% Caucasian, Euro-American) from the statin-tolerant control group were also submitted to WES.

DNA sequencing

Genomic DNA was purified from blood or saliva specimens with Puregene or OraGene protocols, respectively. Whole exome sequencing was performed on 26 of the samples with the Illumina HiSeq instrument and Nimblegen V2 exome enrichment kits in Dr Deborah Nickerson's laboratory at the Northwest Genome Center in Seattle, WA, USA. Sequence data was processed to generate the VCF file as described by Kim et al. [33]. WGS was carried out on 50 of the SAMS cases by the New York Genome Center (NYGC; NY, USA) with the Illumina HiSeq. WES was run on 50 statin-tolerant controls with the Trueseq exome capture kit (Illumina). Sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq. Each sample was run in eight lanes.

Data processing

This includes sequence alignment (for WGS and WES control sequence data only, WES case data were obtained as BAM files from the Northwest Genome Center and used directly for variant calling, see below), sorting alignment by genomic coordinates and marked PCR duplicates, followed by variant calling. All of these were performed using the high performance computing cluster hosted at the Center for Computational Research, University at Buffalo. To align the raw fastq sequences to the reference assembly, we aligned the fastq files generated for each lane from the Illumina platform against the human_g1k_v37_decoy.fasta (download from https://software.broadinstitute.org/gatk/download/bundle) using BWA-MEM and provided read group (ID, Library, Sample, etc.) information that was extracted from sequence file names. The resulting bam files are sorted by genomic coordinates and subsequently merged to obtain one bam file per sample using Picard (v.1.131), with PCR duplicates marked during this step. For variant calling, we used an in-house developed variant calling pipeline utilizing modules from the Genome Analysis Tool Kit (GATK, v3.6, Broad Institute) with parameters according to their best practice documentation. Briefly, the bam files are subjected to base quality recalibration, joint genotyping using ‘HaplotypeCaller’ and ‘GenotypeGVCFs.’ Raw variants are filtered using the ‘Variant Quality Score Recalibration’ tool and output as a multisample VCF file for each of the sequencing cohort (WGS, WES case or WES control).

Coverage analysis of the sequencing runs showed in all cases that exon 91 had relatively low coverage (Supplementary Figure 1), which is consistent with no data being presented for this region in the ExAC database. The greatest overall coverage was obtained with whole exome sequencing of the statin-tolerant control group ensuring that there was no bias toward identifying more genetic variants in the case group than in the control group.

Variant annotation

VCF files from above are used as input for variant annotation using Annovar (1 February, 2016 version) [34]. We annotated variants for population frequencies (ExAC, 1000 Genome Project Phase III, ESP6500), pathogenic predictions (SIFT, PolyPhen2, CADD, REVEL), functional consequences, disease associations (ClinVar, GWAS catalog) – among others.

Candidate variants selection

Annotated VCF files were used as input to populate the Genomic Data Warehouse (GDW) developed at the Center for Computational Research, University at Buffalo. It is a database tool aimed at facilitating genomic variant data storage as well as fast and efficient retrieval for variants satisfying user defined filtering criteria. To search for candidate variants, three steps are needed, in other words, select dataset, set/select filters and select attributes/field names to return. Specifically, we used the following filtering criteria to obtain our list of candidate disease associated variants: RefGene IDs: NM_000540, NM_000069 and the cases and controls were also screened for a list of 114 genes associated with myopathy compiled by Abath Neto [16]. The list was also limited to minor allele frequency (MAF) in ExAC All populations: <0.02. For attributes/field names to return, we included chromosome, chromosomal position, reference allele, alternate allele, variant type, GATK VQSR score, dbSNP ID, gene, exon, cDNA change, amino acid change, REVEL score, dbscSNV_ADA score, dbscSNV_RF score, MAF in the ExAC All populations database, ClinVar clinical significance and sample ID.

Variants were categorized into five classes of pathogenicity based on the type of variant, frequency in the general population from the ExAC database and reports in the literature and the HGMD, ClinVar and Leiden Muscular Dystrophy databases. As previously reported [35], variant effect prediction algorithms do not correctly predict the effect of all RYR1 and CACNA1S variants, both pathogenic and benign. This is shown in Supplementary Table 1 with the 44 established RYR1 and CACNA1S pathogenic variants that have been functionally demonstrated to cause MHS (emhg.org). More than half of the 44 known MHS causing mutations are predicted to be tolerated by the SIFT algorithm. Consensus prediction algorithms integrating several different individual algorithms have been found to be more accurate [36,37]. We have used REVEL, which integrates prediction scores from 13 different individual algorithm tools [38] and accurately predicts all of the EMHG mutations to be pathogenic. The REVEL score does, however, incorrectly predict one of the benign common CACNA1S variants, G258D, examined by Schiemann and Stoell [35] as pathogenic (Supplementary Table 2) and also incorrectly predicts the pathogenicity of a number of the variants identified in this study that are too frequent in the population to be pathogenic, such as RYR1 K1393R, R1679H, R3539H, H3647Q and D4505H (Table 1) and CACNA1S G258D, S606N and R683C (Table 2). While the REVEL score cannot be relied upon to be completely accurate, it is the most accurate prediction approach currently available.

Table 1. . RYR1 variants <0.02 minor allele frequency.

Chr Position (hg19) cDNA change aa change Exon Class REVEL Conserved dbscSNV_ADA dbscSNV_RF ExAC ALL Sample ID

RYR1 variants in statin myopathy cases
19 38937141 c.C661T p.L221F exon8 4 0.726 Yes None None 0 2155

19 38948227 c.C1882T p.R628C exon17 4 0.745 Yes None None 2.47E-05 2048

19 38948268 c.C1923G p.T641T exon17 1 None Yes 0.5625 0.336 0.0009 2063

19 38949859 c.G2241A p.L747L exon19 1 None Yes None None 0.0014 1443, 2157

19 38954162 c.G2677A p.G893S exon21 2 0.837 Yes None None 0.0006 2157

19 38956779 c.C2919T p.H973H exon24 1 None Yes None None 0.0021 2168

19 38958397 c.G3326A p.R1109K exon25 1 0.088 Yes None None 0.0017 1443, 2157

19 38960067 c.A3679G p.I1227V exon27 2 0.364 Yes None None 8.26E-06 2170

19 38964109 c.T3858C p.L1286L exon28 1 None No None None 0.0149 2048, 2074, 2157

19 38964317 c.G4066A p.A1356T exon28 2 0.157 No None None 0 2063

19 38964322 c.C4071T p.P1357P exon28 1 None Yes None None 0.0006 2074

19 38966001 c.C4204T p.P1402S exon29 4 0.563 Yes None None 0 2198

19 38968484 c.G4428C p.G1476G exon30 1 None Yes None None 0 2257

19 38973933 c.A4711G p.I1571V exon33 1 0.56 Yes None None 0.0013 2168

19 38973941 c.G4719A p.P1573P exon33 1 None Yes None None 0.003 1443, 2157

19 38974154 c.C4932T p.N1644N exon33 4 None No 0.9923 0.898 0 2196

19 38976770 c.C5475A p.H1825Q exon34 2 0.285 No None None 0 2162

19 38979903 c.G5634C p.E1878D exon35 1 0.061 No None None 0.0014 2074

19 38985101 c.C6384T p.Y2128Y exon39 1 None Yes None None 0.0032 2074

19 38985215 c.C6498T p.L2166L exon39 1 None Yes None None 0.0021 2157

19 38987117 c.G6732A p.R2244R exon41 1 None Yes None None 0.001 2063

19 38990456 c.C7209T p.R2403R exon44 1 None No None None 0.0154 2162

19 38990457 c.G7210A p.E2404K exon44 3 0.676 No None None 2.85E-05 2168

19 38990632 c.C7299T p.L2433L exon45 1 None Yes None None 6.61E-05 2077

19 38991600 c.C7584T p.P2528P exon47 1 None Yes None None 0.0142 2078

19 38993269 c.G7737A p.V2579V exon48 1 None No None None 0.0029 2257

19 38993279 c.C7747T p.L2583L exon48 1 None Yes None None 3.35E-05 2059

19 38994925 c.C7992T p.F2664F exon50 1 None No None None 4.13E-05 2189

19 38994959 c.C8026T p.R2676W exon50 5 0.601 Yes None None 8.25E-06 2236

19 38996014 c.G8376A p.R2792R exon53 1 None Yes None None 0.0048 2152

19 38998362 c.G8827A p.D2943N exon58 2 0.725 Yes None None 0.0009 2074

19 39001154 c.T8949C p.S2983S exon59 1 None Yes None None 0.0012 2074

19 39001380 c.C9081T p.S3027S exon60 1 None Yes None None 4.94E-05 2214

19 39003103 c.A9452G p.Q3151R exon63 4 0.684 Yes None None 0 2189

19 39009954 c.G10119A p.V3373V exon67 1 None Yes None None 0.0007 1406

19 39016132 c.G10616A p.R3539H exon71 1 0.877 Yes None None 0.0018 2264

19 39018329 c.C10729T p.R3577W exon73 2 0.344 No None None 0.0001 2261

19 39018347 c.G10747C p.E3583Q exon73 1 0.32 No None None 0.0149 2216, 2242

19 39019242 c.C10941G p.H3647Q exon75 2 0.509 Yes None None 0.001 2074

19 39026667 c.G11547A p.Q3849Q exon82 1 None Yes None None 0.0168 2145, 2221, 2223

19 39057597 c.C13484T p.P4495L exon92 2 0.244 No None None 5.18E-05 2024

19 39057598 c.G13485A p.P4495P exon92 1 None No None None 0.0001 2157

19 39061267 c.T13680C p.F4560F exon94 1 None Yes None None 0.0007 2261

19 39070762 c.G14505A p.G4835G exon100 1 None Yes None None 0.0034 1443

RYR1 variants in statin-tolerant controls

19 38943526 c.G1312A p.E438K exon13 3 0.73 No None None 1.15E-05 1017

19 38948268 c.C1923G p.T641T exon17 1 None Yes 0.5625 0.336 0.0009 1167

19 38948886 c.C2121A p.G707G exon18 1 None Yes None None 0.002 1410

19 38949938 c.G2320A p.G774R exon19 2 0.623 Yes None None 0.0003 1230

19 38956963 c.C3103T p.R1035W exon24 4 0.791 Yes None None 1.35E-05 1007

19 38964179 c.G3928T p.A1310S exon28 2 0.415 No None None 0 1088

19 38965975 c.A4178G p.K1393R exon29 1 0.555 No None None 0.0051 1410

19 38976331 c.G5036A p.R1679H exon34 1 0.918 Yes None None 0.0015 1147

19 38976655 c.C5360T p.P1787L exon34 1 0.055 No None None 0.0196 1107, 1109, 1126

19 38987117 c.G6732A p.R2244R exon41 1 None Yes None None 0.001 1167

19 39009883 c.C10048A p.R3350R exon67 1 None No None None 5.81E-05 1126

19 39009954 c.G10119A p.V3373V exon67 1 None Yes None None 0.0007 1217

19 39018347 c.G10747C p.E3583Q exon73 1 0.32 No None None 0.0149 1017

19 39026667 c.G11547A p.Q3849Q exon82 1 None Yes None None 0.0168 1004, 1153

19 39057626 c.G13513C p.D4505H exon92 1 0.663 Yes None None 0.0061 1142, 1147

19 39070762 c.G14505A p.G4835G exon100 1 None Yes None None 0.0034 1072

Table 2. . CACNA1S variants <0.02 minor allele frequency.

Chr Position (hg19) cDNA change aa change Exon Class REVEL Conserved dbscSNV_ADA dbscSNV_RF ExAC ALL Sample ID

CACNA1S variants in statin myopathy cases
1 201079385 c.G165A p.T55T exon2 1 None Yes None None 0.0003 2157

1 201079298 c.C252T p.L84L exon2 1 None No None None 0.0017 2157

1 201058428 c.C858T p.Y286Y exon6 1 None Yes None None 0.0061 2078, 2184, 2257

1 201054624 c.C1090T p.R364W exon8 3 0.554 No None None 1.65E-05 2214

1 201047078 c.G1548A p.S516S exon11 1 None No None None 0.0094 2155, 2179, 2239

1 201044689 c.G1882A p.G628S exon13 4 0.742 Yes None None 8.24E-06 2142

1 201043702 c.C1995T p.A665A exon14 1 None Yes None None 0.0072 2155, 2179, 2239

1 201043650 c.C2047T p.R683C exon14 1 0.6 Yes None None 0.0031 2185

1 201042742 c.2089_2091del p.E697del exon15 4 None Yes None None 0 2157

1 201038705 c.C2385T p.I795I exon18 1 None No None None 0 2339

1 201038636 c.G2454A p.A818A exon18 1 None No None None 0.0018 2194

1 201038610 c.T2480C p.M827T exon18 1 0.316 No None None 0.0042 2239

1 201035429 c.C2673T p.S891S exon21 1 None No None None 0.0121 2257

1 201035035 c.C2784T p.I928I exon22 1 None No None None 0.0017 2179

1 201029939 c.A3261G p.Q1087Q exon26 1 None Yes None None 0.0088 2066, 2143, 2181

1 201028425 c.C3417G p.H1139Q exon27 4 0.804 Yes None None 0 1394

1 201020172 c.A4053G p.T1351T exon33 1 None Yes None None 0.0014 2179

1 201017811 c.G4340A p.R1447Q exon36 4 0.502 Yes 0.9847 0.868 8.28E-05 2024

1 201012542 c.G4915C p.E1639Q exon40 2 0.429 No None None 0 2155

1 201012503 c.C4954T p.R1652C exon40 2 0.366 No None None 0.0003 2078

1 201012449 c.T5008A p.Y1670N exon40 2 0.234 No None None 0.0002 2189

1 201009404 c.T5325C p.N1775N exon43 1 None No None None 4.18E-05 2024

CACNA1S variants in statin-tolerant controls

1 201058513 c.G773A p.G258D exon6 1 0.784 Yes None None 0.0074 1010, 1088, 1121

1 201046058 c.G1817A p.S606N exon12 1 0.521 Yes None None 0.0088 1167

1 201043637 c.C2060A p.S687Y exon14 2 0.435 No None None 0 1072

1 201029939 c.A3261G p.Q1087Q exon26 1 None Yes None None 0.0088 1113

1 201013506 c.G4747A p.E1583K exon39 2 0.681 Yes None None 0.0002 1237

1 201009011 c.G5570A p.S1857N exon44 1 0.339 No None None 0.0019 1113, 1147

Outside of in silico predictions, two criteria hold for all of the EMHG established mutations; they are absolutely conserved in sequence comparisons across species (Supplementary Figures 2 & 3) and they have a very low frequency in the general population. The most frequent of the mutations, T2206M and R2355W, were only present in the ExAC database with a MAF = 0.00003. Based on this consideration, we have set <0.0001 MAF in the ExAC database as the lowest frequency to be considered as a potentially pathogenic mutation. Class 5, pathogenic variants (mutations), have <0.0001 MAF, have been reported more than once in disease cases and have not been identified in unaffected individuals, are nonsense or splicing variants or nonsynonymous variants with REVEL scores >0.5 and absolutely conserved in interspecies amino acid comparisons. Class 4, probably pathogenic variants, have <0.0001 MAF, are nonsense or splicing variants or nonsynonymous variants with REVEL scores >0.5, affect amino acid residues that are absolutely conserved in interspecies amino acid comparisons and have not been previously reported. Class 3, uncertain pathogenicity, have REVEL scores >0.5, <0.0001 MAF, introduce nonconservative amino acid substitutions into residues that are not absolutely conserved in interspecies comparisons, but have only conservative, structurally similar substitutions in other species. Class 2, likely benign variants, have <0.001 MAF and are nonsynonymous variants that may have failed to meet all of the criteria of strong algorithmic predictions, sequence conservation or complete segregation with disease cases. Class 1, benign variants (polymorphisms), include synonymous variants and nonsynonymous variants with >0.001 MAF.

All class 3, 4 or 5 genetic variants identified by exome or genome sequencing were verified by bidirectional Sanger sequencing. Sequencing was performed with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (ABI) and an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer. Oligonucleotide primer sequences used for PCR amplification and sequencing are available upon request.

Results

In the examination of the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes in 76 genomic DNA samples from subjects with severe SAMS, 66 rare variants (<0.02 MAF in the ExAC database) were found compared with 22 in the control group of 50 statin-tolerant subjects (Tables 1 & 2). Categorization of these variants into five classes of pathogenicity resulted in one class 5, pathogenic variant, nine class 4, probably pathogenic variants and two class 3, variants of uncertain pathogenicity in the SAMS cases. In the statin-tolerant controls, there was one class 4 and one class 3 variant. Three of the variants in RYR1 have been previously reported as causative of congenital myopathy (G893S [39,40], R2676W [41]) or MHS (E2404K, R2676W [42]). By our classification scheme, R2676W, was ranked class 5, E2404K was ranked class 3 and G893S was categorized as class 2, probably benign.

Case 2236: a 56-year-old Caucasian male with severe SAMS presented with muscle pain, weakness and rhabdomyolysis, plasma CK of 8000 IU/dl and was diagnosed with inflammatory myositis (Table 3). The subject had coronary artery disease and a history of a previous heart attack. He had been taking simvastatin (80 mgs) at the time muscle symptoms began. After stopping statin therapy, his symptoms persisted for 25 months. The subject was found to have a probably pathogenic variant, R2676W, in the RYR1 gene which has been previously reported in a family study as a novel variant associated with MHS and the presence of multiminicores in muscle biopsies from MHS family members [41]. In that study, the R2676W variant as well as an additional variant, T2787S, on the same allele segregated completely with disease in 19 family members studied by genetic testing. R2676W has also been reported in an unrelated MHS patient along with three additional RYR1 variants, A1352G, T2787S and P4501L [42]. Arg2676 is absolutely conserved in interspecies sequence comparisons (Supplementary Figure 2) and the R2676W variant is extremely rare, 0.000008 MAF in the ExAC database. Thr2787 is also absolutely conserved but the variant T2787S is too frequent in the general population (0.003 MAF) to be considered pathogenic. The co-occurrence of this variant along with the R2676W in unrelated MHS patients by both Guis et al. [41] and Levano et al. [42] is suggestive of a possible role of the T2787S influencing the effect of the R2676W variant; however, Thr2787 is located 25 Å from Arg2676 and would not have an obvious effect. The T2787S variant was not detected in the sample containing R2676W in this study.

Table 3. . Clinical features of individuals with probably pathogenic variants in RYR1 and CACNA1S.

ID Sex/Race Gene Variant Sx Onset (y) Skeletal muscle symptoms CK (IU/l) Statin (mg) Pers Sx (mos) Cardiac symptoms Other features

          Pain Weakness Inflam       CAD Ht Attack Fam Hx Dis Hypothy Hypertens Diabetes Obesity Other
Test Subjects

2236 M/Cauc RYR1 R2676W 56 Y Y Y 8000 ATOR (80) 25 Y Y N N N N N Rhabdo

2155 M/Cauc RYR1 L221F 34 Y N N 7500 SIM (20) 0.75 N N N N N N N  

2048 M/Cauc RYR1 R628C 77 N Y N 3000 ATOR (10) >3 N N N N N Y N Fam Hx MD

2189 M/Cauc RYR1 Q3151R 37 Y N N 35,000 ATOR (NA) 24 N N N N N N N Elev liv enz

2198 F/Cauc RYR1 P1402S 60 Y N Y 1074 SIM (10) 0 N N Y Y N N N  

2196 M/Trindad RYR1 N1644N 56 Y Y N 1600 ROSUV (25) NA Y Y Y Y Y Y N  

1394 M/Cauc CACNA1S H1139Q 60 Y N Y 1000 ATOR (20) 0 N N N N Y Y Y Smoker

2142 M/Cauc CACNA1S G628S 63 Y Y N 78,000 ROSUV (20) NA N N N N N N N Rhabdo/Myogl

2024 M/Cauc CACNA1S R1447Q 80 N N N 2200 SIM (40) Ongoing N N N N Y N N Liv dis

2157 F/AA CACNA1S E697del 61 Y Y N 23,000 SIM (40) 3 N N N N N N N Rhabdo

2214 F/First Nation CACNA1S R364W 60 N Y N 5590 ATOR (10) >12 N N Y N Y Y Y Smoker

2168 M/Mauritius RYR1 E2404K 46 Y Y N 1300 ATOR (NA) 4+ Y Y N N Y N N Liv dis

Control subjects Age entering study

1007 M/Cauc RYR1 R1035W 49 N N N 67 LOVA (40) N N N N N N N N  

1017 M/Cauc RYR1 E438K 49 N N N 145 ATOR (10) N N N N N N N N  

Table 3 describes 12 subjects with severe statin myopathy and class 3–5 variants in the RYR1 or CACNA1S genes; 2 of 50 statin-tolerant controls also had class 3 or 4 variants. The age of onset of symptoms in the myopathic group ranged from 34 to 80 years. All myopathic subjects had plasma CK >5X ULN.

AA: African–American; ATOR: Atorvastatin; CAD: Coronary artery disease; Cauc: Caucasian; CK: Creatine kinase; Dis: Disease; Elev: Elevated; Enz: Enzymes; Exerc Intol: Exercise intolerance; F: Female; Fam: Family; Ht: Heart; Hx: History; Hypertens: Hypertension; Hypothy: Hypothyroidism; Inflam: Inflammation; Liv: Liver; M: Male; MD: Myotonic dystrophy; mos: Months; Myogl: Myoglobinuria; N: No; NA: Not available; Pers: Persistent; Rhabdo: Rhabdomyolysis; ROSUV: Rosuvastatin; SIM: Simvastatin; Sx: Symptoms; y: Years; Y: Yes.

This subject also has a nonsynonymous variant, G178R (REVEL = 0.741, MAF = 0.0002), in the ISPD gene which is predicted to affect splicing. ISPD variants have been associated with congenital muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy with brain and eye anomalies type A7 [43,44].

Case 2155: a 34-year-old Caucasian male with severe statin myopathy presented with muscle pain and a plasma CK of 7500 IU/dl. A history of heart disease was absent in this subject. The subject was taking simvastatin (20 mg) when symptoms began and persisted for 3 weeks post therapy. The subject had a probably pathogenic variant, L221F, in the RYR1 gene. The L221F variant is located within the N-terminal disease hotspot of RYR1, has been previously unreported and is not present in the ExAC database. There are several disease causative nonsynonymous variants located close to Leu221 including T214M [31,45], G215E [46,47], V218I [23,47], R220C [48], M226K [23] and D227V [49]. The Leu221 residue is absolutely conserved in inter-species comparisons and the L221F substitution is predicted to be damaging by REVEL. This is within a region of RyR1 with high-resolution crystal structure information [47]. Modeling based on this structure indicates that Leu221 is located at the interface between N-terminal domains A and B and the L221F substitution is predicted to destabilize this interface (Supplementary Data).

This individual also had rare (MAF <0.001), REVEL-predicted deleterious nonsynonymous variants in three additional myopathy associated genes, CAPN3 (M666T), PLEC (R102L) and MYH2 (A111V). Variants in CAPN3 cause limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A [50]. PLEC variants cause limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2Q [51]. Variants in MYH2 cause congenital myopathy [52,53].

Case 2048: a 77-year-old Caucasian male with statin myopathy presented with muscle weakness only and a plasma CK of 3000 IU/dl. He was taking atorvastatin (10 mgs) at the time symptoms began and reported unexpected weight loss 3 months before stopping statin therapy. Muscle weakness was ongoing post-therapy for at least 3 months. The subject had diabetes and a family history of myotonic dystrophy; however, myotonic dystrophy was ruled out genetically in this individual. He was found to have a probably pathogenic variant, R628C, in the RYR1 gene. R628C is a previously unreported very rare (MAF = 0.00002) RYR1 variant, absolutely conserved in inter-species sequence comparisons and strongly predicted to be deleterious by in-silico analysis (REVEL = 0.745). Modeling of this region of RyR1 based on structures of Yuchi et al. [54] suggests that the R628H variant would lead to the destabilization of FKBP12 binding (Supplementary Data).

This individual also had a nonsynonymous variant in the CRYAB gene, G154S, REVEL = 0.507, MAF = 0.0008. Variants in CRYAB have been associated with myofibrillar myopathy [55,56].

Case 2189: a 37 year-old Caucasian male presented with statin-induced muscle pain and a plasma CK of 35,000 IU/dl at its highest post-exercise. He was taking atorvastatin (dose unknown) at the time of symptom onset and symptoms persisted 24 months post-therapy. He had exercise intolerance and abnormally elevated liver enzymes. For 6 years post therapy he continued to have aches in his muscles primarily in the quadriceps. The subject had a family history of heart disease without a personal history. The subject was found to have a probably pathogenic variant, Q3151R, in the RYR1 gene and a co-existing Class 2 variant, Y1670N, in the CACNA1S gene. Q3151R has not been reported and is not in the ExAC database. Q3151R is located in helical domain 2 [57] and could play a role in destabilizing the helical region. Gln3151 is absolutely conserved in inter-species comparison and is predicted to be deleterious (REVEL = 0.684).

Case 2198: a 60-year-old Caucasian female presented with muscle pain and a plasma CK of 1024 IU/dl 4 days after initiating simvastatin (10 mgs) therapy; symptoms did not persist post-therapy, although the subject self-reported having inflammatory myositis. The subject had a family history of heart disease and a personal history of hypothyroidism. The subject had a probably pathogenic variant, P1402S, in the RYR1 gene that has not been reported and is not found in the ExAC database. Pro1402 is absolutely conserved in interspecies comparisons and P1402S is predicted to be deleterious (REVEL = 0.563). Pro1402 is located in the SPRY3 domain and is not well resolved in available structural models.

This subject also had a nonsynonymous variant in MYH7, R1475C (REVEL = 0.659, MAF = 0.00008). Genetic variants in MYH7 are primarily causative of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [58], but have also been associated with Laing distal myopathy and myosin storage myopathy [59].

Case 2196: a 56-year-old male from Trinidad presented with muscle pain, cramps stiffness, muscle swelling and weakness with a plasma CK of 1600 IU/dl while taking rosuvastatin (25 mgs). He had originally taken atorvastatin 15 years earlier that made pre-existing muscle aches worse. His symptoms persisted for 10 years at which time he began rosuvastatin therapy. The subject had many pre-existing conditions including coronary artery disease, a previous heart attack, diabetes, hypertension, hypothyroidism and a family history of heart disease and muscle disease. The subject had a probably pathogenic variant, N1644N, in the RYR1 gene. This synonymous variant was not present in the ExAC database and is predicted to cause aberrant splicing (dbscSNV_ADA score = 0.9923, dbscSNV_RF score = 0.898). It is categorized as Class 4 since it is a predicted splicing defect but has not been demonstrated experimentally.

This individual also had a nonsynonymous variant in DYSF, E1471K (REVEL = 0.651, MAF = 0.0003), that is predicted to affect splicing. DYSF variants cause two main types of muscle disease, Myoshi myopathy and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B [60,61].

Case 1394: a 60-year-old Caucasian male presented with muscle pain primarily in his arms and a plasma CK of 1000 IU/dl while taking atorvastatin (20 mgs). The subject self-reported dark colored urine that may be indicative of unconfirmed myoglobinuria. He reported having diabetes, hypertension and a family history of inflammatory muscle disease in his father and brother. A probably pathogenic variant, H1139Q, was found in the CACNA1S gene. H1139Q is very rare, not present in the ExAC database and strongly predicted to be deleterious (REVEL = 0.804). This subject also had a nonsynonymous variant, R1064W (REVEL = 0.716, MAF = 0.0002) in COL6A3. Collagen VI-related disorders are caused by variants in COL6A1, COL6A2 and COL6A3 and include Bethlem myopathy and congenital Ullrich muscular dystrophy [62,63].

Case 2142: a 63-year-old Caucasian male presented with pain and weakness predominantly in his arms and calves with rhabdomyolysis and a plasma CK of 78,000 IU/dl occurring within 3 months of taking rosuvastatin (20 mgs). The subject reported no personal or family history of heart disease or muscle disease. A probably pathogenic variant, G628S, was found in the CACNA1S gene. G628S is rare (MAF = 8 × 10-6), Gly628 is absolutely conserved and G628S is strongly predicted to be deleterious in silico.

Case 2024: an 80-year-old Caucasian male presented with an elevated plasma CK of 2200 IU/dl without apparent muscle pain or weakness while initially taking simvastatin (40 mgs) which was changed to pravastatin (40 mg). Since the subject did not have a baseline CK measured before starting statins, it is unclear whether he had pre-existing elevations of CK, however, CK decreased after stopping statins altogether. A probably pathogenic variant, R1447Q, was found in the in the CACNA1S gene. R1447Q is rare (MAF = 0.00008), Arg 1447 is absolutely conserved and R1447Q is strongly predicted to be deleterious in silico. This subject also had a nonsynonymous variant in ENO3, K193N (REVEL = 0.591, MAF = 8 × 10-6). Muscle ENO3 deficiency has been associated with exercise intolerance and rhabdomyolysis [64].

Case 2157: a 61-year-old African–American female presented with muscle aches and burning pain as well as muscle weakness and rhabdomyolysis with dark-colored urine and plasma CKs exceeding 23,000 IU/dl while taking simvastatin (40 mgs). In addition, she reportedly had hypertension, liver disease and renal failure. A probably pathogenic variant, E697del, was found in the CACNA1S gene with a co-existing Class 2 variant, G893S, in the RYR1 gene. E697del is extremely rare, not present in the ExAC database and Glu697 is absolutely conserved in interspecies amino acid sequence comparisons. Glu697 is located in the region of CACNA1S linking repeats II and III. These loop regions, particularly residues within the II–III loop, have been shown to be important for excitation–contraction coupling [65,66]. While the RYR1 variant, G893S, has been reported in patients with congenital myopathy [39,40], it has also been identified in general population samples [67]. The identification of variants in the general population does not necessarily rule out potential pathogenicity since nonmanifesting patients with known established pathogenic RYR1 variants have been previously reported. For example, in one study [68], a patient with the known MHS causative RYR1 variant, R614C, did not have a family history of disease and did not have adverse reactions to previous surgical anesthesia. Gly893 is absolutely conserved across species and the G893S variant is strongly predicted to be damaging by all variant effect prediction algorithms; however, we have categorized G893S as class 2, likely benign, because of the relatively high frequency (0.0006 MAF) of this variant in the ExAC database. Furthermore, although the location of Gly893 is clearly resolved in structural studies [54], the alteration to a serine residue is not obviously predicted to influence other residues. Subject 10 also had a nonsynonymous variant in AGRN, G719S (REVEL = 0.56, MAF = 0.0005). AGRN variants have been associated with myasthenia syndrome and muscle weakness [69].

Case 2214: a 60-year-old First Nation female presented with muscle weakness in the absence of muscle pain and a plasma CK of 5590 IU/dl while taking atorvastatin (10 mgs). Her symptoms persisted for more than 12 months post-therapy with CKs remaining in the range of 3500–5000 until she was given prednisone with subsequent normalization of CK. She was eventually tested for HMG-CoA reductase autoantibodies and found to be positive with unknown significance. She had hypertension, diabetes, obesity and there was a family history of heart disease. A class 3 variant was found in the CACNA1S gene, R364W, that is rare (MAF = 2 × 10-6) and predicted to be deleterious (REVEL = 0.554). In interspecies amino acid comparisons only the conservative change to Lys is observed in distant species. Arg364 is in the linker region between CACNA1S repeats I and II.

Case 2168: a 46-year-old Mauritian male developed muscle pain and weakness with a plasma CK of 1300 IU/dl while taking atorvastatin (unknown dose). He had persistent symptoms post therapy for more than 4 months. The subject had a history of hypertension, a previous heart attack, coronary artery disease and liver disease of unspecified etiology; there was no family history of heart disease. A variant (E2404K) was found in the RYR1 gene that has been previously reported once in a MHS patient [42]. E2404K is located within the central hotspot region of RYR1, is rare (<0.00003 MAF) and strongly predicted to be deleterious (REVEL = 0.676). Characterization of lymphoblastoid cells containing DNA from patients with the E2404K variant show increased resting calcium levels and an enhanced response to caffeine [42]. We have categorized E2404K as class 3, of uncertain pathogenicity, since Glu2404 is not completely conserved across species. Levano et al. [42] mentioned that it was interesting that this residue was also Lys in the homologous RYR2 gene, however, in our alignment of human RYR1 and RYR2 amino acid sequences, Glu2404 is altered to Thr in RYR2. Subject 12 also contained a probably pathogenic nonsynonymous variant in DYSF, D467E (REVEL = 0.549), that is not present in the ExAC database.

Control 1007. A 49-year-old Caucasian male had no muscle symptoms while taking lovastatin (40 mgs) and had a plasma CK of 67 IU/dl. The subject was taking lovastatin for 4 months before entering the study. He reported no personal or family history of heart disease or other related risk factors. A probably pathogenic variant, R1035W, was found in the RYR1 gene. R1035W is rare (MAF = 0.00001), absolutely conserved and strongly predicted to be deleterious (REVEL = 0.791). At 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up, the subject continued to be asymptomatic with no change in his statin medication.

Control 1017. A 49-year-old Caucasian male had no muscle symptoms while taking atorvastatin (10 mgs). There was no personal or family history of heart disease or other cardiovascular risk factors. The subject had a plasma CK of 145 IU/dl. A probably pathogenic variant, E438K, was identified in the RYR1 gene. This variant is located within the N-terminal disease hotspot region and is both rare and predicted to be deleterious in silico. We have classified E438K of uncertain pathogenicity, class 3, because Glu438 is not completely conserved across species, although only the conservative aspartate substitution is found in other species at this residue.

Discussion

Of 76 subjects with clinically severe SAMS and whose genomic DNA was analyzed by WES or WGS, 12 (16%) had probably pathogenic nonsynonymous variants in either the RYR1 gene or the CACNA1S gene using stringent in silico criteria. Since 44 variants in these genes have been functionally and genetically proven to be causative for malignant hyperthermia as determined by the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group (EMHG.org), two criteria met by all 44 EMHG variants were used as a basis in the assignment of pathogenicity to variants in this study. These included absolute sequence conservation across species and a very low frequency in the general population (MAF <0.0001). In addition, REVEL scoring, which integrates prediction scores from 13 different algorithm tools was used with a cutoff of >0.50 for pathogenicity [38]. It is possible that we have left out variants that are actually pathogenic using these strict criteria as many had REVEL scores >0.50 and/or were very rare but, considering all factors, were predicted as being Class 2 variants (e.g., D943N in the RYR1 gene with a REVEL score of 0.725 and MAF 0.0009) (Table 1). The statin-tolerant controls carrying probably pathogenic variants should still be monitored for muscle symptoms during statin therapy over time since, by definition, ‘awake state’ phenotypes caused by pathogenic variants in MH-causing genes must be initiated by environmental triggers including but not limited to anesthesia, exertion, heat stroke and statin therapy [28,70]. The two positive controls may be at risk for MHS, but may also have other genetic variants or lifestyle habits that make them less susceptible to statin side effects or the dose of statin taken did not exceed a threshold for triggering muscle symptoms in these cases.

Clusters of pathogenic variants or hotspots have been identified in three regions of the RYR1 gene: in the N-terminal region, the central region and the C-terminal region [23,71]. Additional RYR1 pathogenic variants are increasingly being identified outside of the predominant hotspots [39]. RYR1 pathogenic variants causative of MHS only or of both MHS and CCD are generally gain of function mutations and result in calcium leakage [72,73]. RYR1 mutations causative of CCD without MHS are loss of function variants and primarily located in the C-terminal region of RyR1 [74,75]. RYR1 mutations causative of MHS with mild pathology or in asymptomatic individuals are mostly located in the N-terminal and central region hotspots. RYR1 nonsynonymous variants identified here in this group of SAMS cases were primarily located within the N-terminal region of RyR1 consistent with a disease mechanism similar to MHS.

Structural data is available for the overall RyR1 tetramer from cryo-EM experiments [57,76–78]. Some regions of RyR1 have been expressed and used to obtain higher resolution crystal structures such as the N-terminal hotspot [47,54,79,80]. Many of the nonsynonymous RYR1 variants identified in this study were not in regions of RyR1 that have sufficient resolution to look for possible structural or functional effects. However, substitutions L221F, R628C, R2676W and Q3151R were in regions that were highly resolved.

L221F is located within the N-terminal hotspot region. The N-terminal region contains domains A, B and C [79], also referred to as β-trefoil domains 1 and 2 and part of the α-solenoid 1 [81]. Docking of high-resolution crystal structures of the N-terminal region, residues 1-559 of RyR1, with lower resolution cryo-EM structures has shown that the N-terminal region is located at the central rim of RyR1 and form a cytoplasmic vestibule [79]. Interactions between domains within the N-terminal region in the closed state appear to be disrupted by the transition to an open state [47,79]. A disease mechanism has been proposed for pathogenic variants in the N-terminal region in which MHS pathogenic variants disrupt interactions between N-terminal domains and act as gain of function mutations that favor the transition to an open state and increased calcium release [47,79].

R628C in RyR1 falls within a region predicted by docking studies to contact FKBP12 (Supplementary Data). FKBP12 binding has been shown to promote the closed state of RyRs and reduce the occurrence of subconductance states [82]. Because of this, variants that interfere with FKBP binding have been proposed to cause RyR Ca++ leakage and associated disease states [54]. The precise binding site for FKBP12 is not completely understood, perhaps due to the large allosteric changes that occur within the RyR N-terminal regions [54].

Limitations of this study include aspects of its retrospective design such as the acquisition of limited or incomplete clinical details for review and summary for individual subjects. Another limitation is that because of our stringent selection of the probably pathogenic variants, we likely have left behind other important variants among the remaining 54 found with MAF <0.02 in the ExAC database. These should not be discounted in future studies.

All of the subjects with probably pathogenic RYR1 or CACNA1S variants also had co-existing variants of unknown significance within these genes that are too common in the general population to be individually pathogenic. The association of disease with RYR1 variants of predicted pathogenicity, but with frequencies too high to be considered as pathogenic have not been well studied, particularly when occurring along with other known deleterious variants. Likewise, the predicted pathogenic rare variants in other muscle disease genes (DYSF, CAPN3, MYH2, MYH7 and others) found in subjects with variants in RYR1 or CACNA1S may be partially, synergistically or completely responsible for the manifesting symptoms, however, we have no way of testing this possibility.

Conclusion

Probably pathogenic variants in the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes were found to be significant potential contributors to risk for severe SAMS. Previously unreported, predicted pathogenic variants were found in the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes in 16% of the severe SAMS cases examined and may explain their susceptibility to statin therapy.

All of the subjects with probably pathogenic RYR1 or CACNA1S variants also have less rare co-existing variants of unknown significance within these genes as well as probably pathogenic variants within other genes associated with myopathic phenotypes. Clinicians should be mindful of the severity and longevity of muscle symptoms in patients with SAMS as well as plasma CK levels ≥4X ULN and consider in severe cases molecular testing for triggerable myopathies known to cause rhabdomyolysis.

Future Perspectives

Continued study of variants in RYR1 and CACNA1S at both the clinical and experimental level will contribute to a better understanding of their contributions to disease. Further, the identification and characterization of additional genes and pathogenic variants contributing to SAMS will lead to better therapeutic strategies for patients requiring cholesterol-lowering treatment.

Summary points.

  • Probably pathogenic variants in the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes are prominent in 16% of cases with statin-associated muscle symptoms representing a fourfold increase over statin-tolerant controls.

  • Structural modeling of selected variants found in the RYR1 gene demonstrated a range of predicted alterations associated with disease including disruption of the RYR1 receptor from the closed to open state and interference of FKBP binding causing calcium leakage.

  • Subjects with RYR1 or CACNA1S variants had plasma CK 5X- to more than 400X upper limit of normal as well as muscle pain and/or weakness. Several had co-existing conditions including cardiac symptoms, hypertension or diabetes.

  • Genetic variants within the RYR1 and CACNA1S genes are likely to be major contributors to susceptibility to statin-associated muscle symptoms.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the generous contributions of many subjects, their specimens and medical history information from the following: M Tarnopolsky (McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada); M Weisman (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA); W Peltier (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwuakee, WI, USA); L Christopher-Stine (Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA); and RL Wortmann (Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA). The authors also acknowledge The People's Pharmacy (Joe & Terry Graeden) for assisting in the recruitment of subjects via an announcement in their syndicated newspaper column.

Footnotes

Supplementary data

To view the supplementary data that accompany this paper please visit the journal website at: https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/suppl/10.2217/pgs-2018-0106

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This work was supported by grants from the John R Oishei Foundation; an Interdisciplinary Research and Creative Activities Award from the University at Buffalo's Office of the Vice President for Research; NIH grants R01 HL085800; R21 AR055704; the Paul E Rich Jr & Doris Miller Rich Fund and by the New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences at the University of Buffalo. We acknowledge the help of UB's Genomics and Bioinformatics Core and the Buffalo Institute for Genomics and Data Analytics. Whole exome sequencing services were provided by the Northwest Genomics Center at the University of Washington, Department of Genome Sciences, under US Federal Government contract number HHSN268201100037C from the NIH, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Rosenbaum D, Dallongeville J, Sabouret P, Bruckert E. Discontinuation of statin therapy due to muscular side effects: a survey in real life. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2013;23:871–875. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2012.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cohen JD, Brinton EA, Ito MK, Jacobson TA. Understanding statin use in America and gaps in patient education (USAGE): an internet-based survey of 10,138 current and former statin users. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2012;6:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shek A, Ferrill MJ. Statin–fibrate combination therapy. Ann. Pharmacother. 2001;35:908–917. doi: 10.1345/aph.10315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.SEARCH Collaborative Group. Link E, Parish S, et al. SLCO1B1 variants and statin-induced myopathy – a genomewide study. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:789–799. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oh J, Ban MR, Miskie BA, Pollex RL, Hegele RA. Genetic determinants of statin intolerance. Lipids Health Dis. 2007;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-6-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Isackson PJ, Ochs-Balcom HM, Ma C, et al. Association of common variants in the human eyes shut ortholog (EYS) with statin-induced myopathy: evidence for additional functions of EYS. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44:531–538. doi: 10.1002/mus.22115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mangravite LM, Engelhardt BE, Medina MW, et al. A statin-dependent QTL for GATM expression is associated with statin-induced myopathy. Nature. 2013;502:377–380. doi: 10.1038/nature12508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Luzum JA, Kitzmiller JP, Isackson PJ, et al. GATM polymorphism associated with the risk for statin-induced myopathy does not replicate in case–control analysis of 715 dyslipidemic individuals. Cell Metab. 2015;21:622–627. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Floyd JS, Bis JC, Brody JA, Heckbert SR, Rice K, Psaty BM. GATM locus does not replicate in rhabdomyolysis study. Nature. 2014;513:E1–E3. doi: 10.1038/nature13629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Santos PC, Gagliardi AC, Miname MH, et al. SLCO1B1 haplotypes are not associated with atorvastatin-induced myalgia in Brazilian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012;68:273–279. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1125-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brunham LR, Lansberg PJ, Zhang L, et al. Differential effect of the rs4149056 variant in SLCO1B1 on myopathy associated with simvastatin and atorvastatin. Pharmacogenomics. 2012;12:233–237. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2010.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vladutiu GD, Simmons Z, Isackson PJ, et al. Genetic risk factors associated with lipid-lowering drug-induced myopathies. Muscle Nerve. 2006;34:153–162. doi: 10.1002/mus.20567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hamel Y, Mamoune A, Mauvais FX, et al. Acute rhabdomyolysis and inflammation. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2015;38:621–628. doi: 10.1007/s10545-015-9827-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hunter JM, Ahearn ME, Balak CD, et al. Novel pathognic variants and genes for myopathies identified by whole exome sequencing. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 2015;3:283–301. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Efthymiou S, Manole A, Houlden H. Next-generation sequencing in neuromuscular diseases. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2016;29:527–536. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abath Neto O, Tassy O, Biancalana V, Zanoteli E, Pourquié O, Laporte J. Integrative data mining highlights candidate genes for monogenic myopathies. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e110888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Knoblauch M, Dagnino-Acosta A, Hamilton SL. Mice with RyR1 mutation (Y524S) undergo hypermetabolic response to simvastatin. Skelet. Muscle. 2013;3(1):22. doi: 10.1186/2044-5040-3-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carpenter D, Ringrose C, Leo V, et al. The role of CACNA1S in predisposition to malignant hyperthermia. BMC Med. Genet. 2009;10:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-10-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Horstick EJ, Linsley JW, Dowling JJ, et al. Stac3 is a component of the excitation–contraction coupling machinery and mutated in Native American myopathy. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1952. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Voermans NC, Snoeck M, Jungbluth H. RYR-1 related rhabdomyolysis: a common but probably underdiagnosed manifestation of skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor dysfunction. Rev. Neurol. 2016;172:546–558. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rosenberg H, Davis M, James D, Pollock N, Stowell K. Malignant hyperthermia. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2007;2:21. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Monnier N, Krivosic-Horber R, Payen JF, et al. Presence of two different genetic traits in malignant hyperthermia families: implication for genetic analysis, diagnosis, and incidence of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1067–1074. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200211000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Robinson R, Carpenter D, Shaw MA, Halsall J, Hopkins P. Mutations in RYR1 in malignant hyperthermia and central core disease. Human Mutat. 2006;27:977–989. doi: 10.1002/humu.20356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Amburgey K, Bailey A, Hwang JH, et al. Genotype–phenotype correlations in recessive RYR1-related myopathies. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2013;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Attali R, Aharoni S, Treves S, et al. Variable myopathic presentation in a single family with novel skeletal RYR1 mutation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Duarte ST, Oliveira J, Santos R, et al. Dominant and recessive RYR1 mutations in adults with core lesions and mild muscle symptoms. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44:102–108. doi: 10.1002/mus.22009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dlamini N, Voermans NC, Lillis S, et al. Mutations in RYR1 are a common cause of exertional myalgia and rhabdomyolysis. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2013;23:540–548. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vladutiu GD, Isackson PJ, Kaufman K. Genetic risk for malignant hyperthermia in non-anesthesia-induced myopathies. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2011;104:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tammaro A, Di Martino A, Bracco A, et al. Novel missense mutations and unexpected multiple changes of RYR1 gene in 75 malignant hyperthermia families. Clin. Genet. 2011;79:438–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roux-Buisson N, Monnier N, Sagui E, et al. Identification of variants of the ryanodine receptor type 1 in patients with exertional heat stroke and positive response to the malignant hyperthermia in vitro contracture test. Br. J. Anaesth. 2016;116:566–568. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fiszer D, Shaw MA, Fisher NA, et al. Next-generation sequencing of RYR1 and CACNA1S in malignant hyperthermia and exertional heat illness. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:1033–1046. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stroes ES, Thompson P, Corsini A, et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36(17):1012–1022. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim JH, Jarvik GP, Browning BL, et al. Exome sequencing reveals novel rare variants in the ryanodine receptor and calcium channel genes in malignant hyperthermia families. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1054–1065. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a8a998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from next-generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schiemann AH, Stowell KM. Comparison of pathogenicity prediction tools on missense variants in RYR1 and CACNA1S associated with malignant hyperthermia. Br. J. Anaesth. 2016;117:124–128. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lopes MC, Joyce C, Ritchie GR, et al. A combined functional annotation score for non-synonymous variants. Hum. Hered. 2012;73(1):47–51. doi: 10.1159/000334984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gonzalez-Perez A, Lopez-Bigas N. Improving the assessment of the outcome of nonsynonymous SNVs with a consensus deleteriousness score, Condel. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;88(4):440–449. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, et al. REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016;99:877–885. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Klein A, Lillis S, Munteanu I, Scoto M, et al. Clinical and genetic findings in a large cohort of patients with ryanodine receptor 1 gene-associated myopathies. Hum. Mutat. 2012;33:981–988. doi: 10.1002/humu.22056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Maggi L, Scoto M, Cirak S, et al. Congenital myopathies – clinical features and frequency of individual subtypes diagnosed over a 5-year period in the United Kingdom. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2013;23:195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guis S, Figarella-Branger D, Monnier N, et al. Multiminicore disease in a family susceptible to malignant hyperthermia: histology, in vitro contracture tests, and genetic characterization. Arch. Neurol. 2004;61:106–113. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Levano S, Vukcevic M, Singer M. Increasing the number of diagnostic mutations in malignant hyperthermia. Hum. Mutat. 2009;30:590–598. doi: 10.1002/humu.20878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Roscioli T, Kamsteeg E-J, Buysse K, et al. Mutations in ISPD cause Walker–Warburg syndrome and defective glycosylation of alpha-dystroglycan. Nature Genet. 2012;44(581–585) doi: 10.1038/ng.2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Willer T, Lee H, Lommel M, et al. ISPD loss-of-function mutations disrupt dystroglycan O-mannosylation and cause Walker–Warburg syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:575–580. doi: 10.1038/ng.2252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stephens J, Schiemann AH, Roesl C, et al. Functional analysis of RYR1 variants linked to malignant hyperthermia. Temperature (Austin) 2016;3(2):328–339. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2016.1153360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Romero NB, Monnier N, Viollet L, et al. Dominant and recessive central core disease associated RYR1 mutations and fetal akinesia. Brain. 2003;126:2341–2349. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kimlicka L, Lau K, Tung CC, Van Petegem F. Disease mutations in the ryanodine receptor N-terminal region couple to a mobile intersubumit interface. Nature Commun. 2013;4:1506. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang Y, Peng W, Guo HY, et al. Next-generation sequencing-based molecular diagnosis of neonatal hypotonia in Chinese population. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:29088. doi: 10.1038/srep29088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Monnier N, Kozak-Ribbens G, Krivosic-Horber R, et al. Correlations between genotype and pharmacological, histological, functional, and clinical phenotypes in malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Hum. Mutat. 2005;26(5):413–425. doi: 10.1002/humu.20231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Beckmann JS, Spencer M. Calpain 3, the “gatekeeper” of proper sarcomere assembly, turnover and maintenance. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2008;18(12):913–921. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gundesli H, Talim B, Korkusuz P, et al. Mutation in exon 1f of PLEC, leading to disruption of plectin isoform 1f, causes autosomal-recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;87:834–841. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hernández-Laín A, Esteban-Pérez J, Montenegro DC, Domínguez-González C. Myosin myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia associated with a novel homozygous mutation in MYH2. Muscle Nerve. 2017;55(2):E8–E10. doi: 10.1002/mus.25365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tajsharghi HHS, Lindberg C, Lossos A, et al. Recessive myosin myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia associated with MYH2 mutations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014;22(6):801–808. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yuchi Z, Yuen SM, Lau K, et al. Crystal structures of ryanodine receptor SPRY1 and tandom-repeat domains reveal a critical FKBP12 binding determinant. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7947. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fichna JP, Potulska-Chromik A, Miszta P, et al. A novel dominant D109A CRYAB muation in a family with myofibrillar myopathy affects αB-crystallin structure. BBA Cln. 2017;7:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vincent AE, Grady JP, Rocha MC, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in myofibrillar myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2016;26(10):691–701. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2016.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yan Z, Bai XC, Yan C, et al. Structure of the rabbit ryanodine receptor RyR1 at near-atomic resolution. Nature. 2015;517:50–55. doi: 10.1038/nature14063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Walsh R, Rutland C, Thomas R, Loughna S. Cardiomyopathy: a systematic review of disease-causing mutations in myosin heavy chain 7 and their phenotypic manifestations. Cardiology. 2010;115(1):49–60. doi: 10.1159/000252808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Oldfors A. Hereditary myosin myopathies. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2007;17(5):355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Patel NJ, Van Dyke KW, Espinoza LR. Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 2B and Myoshi presentations in dysferlinopathy. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2017;353(5):484–491. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Amato AA, Brown RH., Jr Dysferlinopathies. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2011;101:111–118. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-045031-5.00007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lampe LK, Bushby KM. Collagen VI-related muscle disorders. J. Med. Genet. 2005;42(9):673–685. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2002.002311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bushby KM, Collins J, Hicks D. Collagen type VI myopathies. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014;802:185–199. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7893-1_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Musumeci O, Brady S, Rodolico C, et al. Recurrent rhabdomyolysis due to muscle β-enolase deficiency: very rare or underestimated? J. Neurol. 2014;261(12):2424–2428. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7512-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tanabe T, Beam KG, Adams BA, Niidome T, Numa S. Regions of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor critical for excitation–contraction coupling. Nature. 1990;346:567–569. doi: 10.1038/346567a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lu X, Xu L, Meissner G. Activation of the skeletal muscle calcium release channel by a cytoplasmic loop of the dihydropyridine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:6511–6516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dorschner MO, Amendola LM, Turner EH, et al. Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants’ exomes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013;93:631–640. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gonsalves SG, Ng D, Johnston JJ, et al. Using exome data to identify malignant hyperthermia susceptibility mutations. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1043–1053. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a8a8e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nicole S, Chaouch A, Torbergsen T, et al. Agrin mutations lead to a congenital myasthenic syndrome with distal muscle weakness and atrophy. Brain. 2014;137:2429–2443. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kraeva N, Sapa A, Dowling JJ, Riazi S. Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in patients with exertional rhabdomyolysis: a retrospective cohort study and updated systematic review. Can. J. Anaesth. 2017;64(7):736–743. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0865-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.McCarthy TV, Quane K, Lynch PJ. Ryanodine receptor mutations in malignant hyperthermia and central core disease. Hum. Mutat. 2000;15:410–417. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200005)15:5<410::AID-HUMU2>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Avila G, Dirksen RT. Functional effects of central core disease mutations in the cytoplasmic region of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. J. Gen. Physiol. 2001;118:277–290. doi: 10.1085/jgp.118.3.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dirksen RT, Avila G. Distinct effects on Ca2+ handling caused by malignant hyperthermia and central core disease mutations in RYR1. Biophys. J. 2004;87:3193–3204. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.048447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Monnier N, Romero NB, Lerale J, et al. Familial and sporadic forms of central core disease are associated with mutations in the C-terminal domain of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Human Mol. Genet. 2001;10:2581–2592. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.22.2581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dirksen RT, Avila G. Altered ryanodine receptor function in central core disease: leaky or uncoupled Ca(2+) release channels? Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2002;12:189–197. doi: 10.1016/s1050-1738(02)00163-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Efremov RG, Leitner A, Aebersold R, Raunser S. Architecture and conformational switch mechanism of the ryanodine receptor. Nature. 2015;517:39–43. doi: 10.1038/nature13916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zalk R, Clarke OB, des Georges A, et al. Structure of a mammalian ryanodine receptor. Nature. 2015;517:44–49. doi: 10.1038/nature13950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.des Georges A, Clarke OB, Zalk R, et al. Structural basis for gating and activation of RYR1. Cell. 2016;167:145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tung CC, Lobo PA, Kimlicka L, Van Petegem F. The amino-terminal disease hotspot of ryanodine receptors forms a cytoplasmic vestibule. Nature. 2010;468:585–588. doi: 10.1038/nature09471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lobo PA, Van Petegem F. Crystal structures of the N-terminal domains of cardiac and skeletal muscle ryanodine receptors: insights into disease mutations. Structure. 2009;17:1505–1514. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yuchi Z, Van Petegem F. Ryanodine receptors under the magnifying lens: Insights and limitations of cryo-electron microscopy and x-ray crystallography studies. Cell Calcium. 2016;59:209–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Brillantes A-MB, Ondrias K, Scott A, et al. Stabilization of calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor) function by FK506-binding protein. Cell. 1994;77:513–523. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90214-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Pharmacogenomics are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES