Abstract
In senescent leaves chlorophyll (Chl) catabolites typically accumulate as colorless tetrapyrroles, classified as formyloxobilin‐type (or type‐I) or dioxobilin‐type (type‐II) phyllobilins (PBs). Yellow type‐I Chl catabolites (YCCs) also occur in some senescent leaves, in which they are generated by oxidation of colorless type‐I PBs. A yellow type‐II PB was recently proposed to occur in extracts of fall leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera), tentatively identified by its mass and UV/Vis absorption characteristics. Here, the first synthesis of a yellow type‐II Chl catabolite (DYCC) from its presumed natural colorless type‐II precursor is reported. A homogenate of a Spatiphyllum wallisii leaf was used as “green” means of effective and selective oxidation. The synthetic DYCC was fully characterized and identified with the yellow grapevine leaf pigment. As related yellow type‐I PBs do, the DYCC functions as a reversible photoswitch by undergoing selective photo‐induced Z/E isomerization of its C15=C16 bond.
Keywords: green chemistry, heterocycles, photoisomerization, phyllobilin, porphyrinoids
The seasonal disappearance of chlorophyll (Chl) and the concomitant development of the fall colors have been a fascinating puzzle, unsolved until about 30 years ago.1 As we know now, senescence‐related breakdown of Chl occurs in a strictly regulated way in higher plants2 and produces abundant bilin‐type Chl catabolites, named phyllobilins (PBs).3 Indeed, a range of colorless typical PBs are generated along the common “PAO/phyllobilin” pathway2a, 4 (PAO=pheophorbide a oxygenase) and accumulate in senescent leaves.5 They are natural descendants of the “red” Chl catabolite (RCC),2b, 6 a cryptic red 1‐formyl‐19‐oxobilin that originates from the specific oxidative cleavage of the macrocycle of pheophorbide a by PAO (see Scheme 1).7 Efficient enzymatic reduction of the C15=C16 bond RCC8 produces colorless, blue fluorescent formyloxobilins (fluorescent type‐I PBs), named “primary” fluorescent Chl catabolites (pFCCs).9 Typical modified fluorescent Chl catabolites (FCCs) are enzymatically produced2b from pFCCs and isomerize spontaneously in the weakly acidic medium of the vacuoles, to corresponding “nonfluorescent” Chl catabolites (NCCs).10 In Arabidopsis thaliana, pFCCs and the corresponding 32‐hydroxy‐pFCCs are deformylated effectively by the cytochrome‐P450‐type oxygenase CYP89A9, opening up a path to fleetingly existent dioxobilin‐type fluorescent Chl catabolites (DFCCs),11 such as At‐DFCC‐33,12 and to their abundant nonfluorescent isomers, such as At‐DNCC‐33, the major dioxobilin‐type NCC (DNCC) in A. thaliana 11, 12 (see Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
Structural outline of key steps of Chl breakdown in higher plants, furnishing two major types of colorless nonfluorescent phyllobilins (PBs), 1‐formyl‐19‐oxobilin‐type (type‐I) or 1,19‐dioxobilin‐type (type‐II) PBs.
DNCCs, named “urobilinogenoidic” Chl catabolites originally,13a were the first dioxobilin‐type PBs that hinted at a second important path of Chl breakdown,13b and DNCCs were eventually detected in a variety of senescent leaves and fruit.5, 11, 13 Hence, two major lines of colorless, “nonfluorescent” Chl catabolites are known to accumulate in leaves of angiosperms, representing NCCs1c, 14 or DNCCs.5, 11, 13a NCCs become oxidized in some leaves (and leaf extracts), yielding yellow Chl catabolites (YCCs), classified as type‐I phylloxanthobilins.15 YCCs have been detected in cold leaf and fruit extracts, in which adventitious in vitro NCC oxidation was prevented.15a, 17 By using a homogenate of a Spatiphyllum wallisii leaf in a “green” oxidation protocol15b, 16 YCC 2 was prepared efficiently from the epimeric NCCs 1 or 1‐epi (Scheme 2). YCCs (and the analogous pyYCCs, which lack the ring E methyl ester function) were found to self‐assemble reversibly to unique H‐bonded and π‐stacked homodimers in medium to low polarity solvents and to display exceptional medium‐dependent photochemistry.16, 18
Scheme 2.
The yellow Chl catabolite YCC 2 is accessible by oxidation of both of the C16 epimeric NCCs, 1 or 1‐epi.
The discovery of the colorless DNCCs,13a such as of Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3),19 as well as their wide occurrence in senescent leaves,5, 11 in degreening vegetables13d and in fruit,13b, 20 has encouraged us to give specific attention to the presumed existence and chemical properties of dioxobilin‐type yellow PBs (DYCCs). We have provisionally detected such type‐II phylloxanthobilins recently in extracts of some naturally senescent leaves, such as Vv‐DYCC‐63 in leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera).19 Here, we describe the partial synthesis of the amphiphilic yellow type‐II PB DYCC 4 by oxidation of Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3), the major DNCC in senescent leaves of grapevine (Scheme 3), the spectral characterization of 4 and its identification with Vv‐DYCC‐63.
Scheme 3.
Preparation of DYCC 4 by “green” oxidation of Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3; see Ref. 19), using a homogenized senescent Sp. wallisii leaf, followed by acid treatment of the intermediate reaction mixture that contained polar DNCC‐like compounds (X=H and/or CH3). The indicated R configuration at C4 is from a tentative assignment for 3 and, thus, is also tentative for 4 and for its polar precursor.
For the partial synthesis of the yellow DYCC 4, the recently described “oxidative activity” of homogenates of S. wallisii leaves (which oxidized some NCCs to YCCs),15b, 16 was tested here for its capacity to similarly oxidize a DNCC for preparative purposes. The abundant Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3), isolated from senescent leaves of grapevine (V. vinifera),19, 21 was used as the starting material (Scheme 3). A solution of Vv‐DNCC‐51 (5.2 mg, 8.2 μmol) in 5 mL of a 1.5:1 mixture of MeOH and aqueous phosphate buffer pH 5.2 was treated with a freshly ground yellow‐green S. wallisii leaf (25 cm2 area). The suspension was stirred for 46 hours at 23 °C under O2 in the dark. HPLC analysis of the filtered reaction mixture revealed significant conversion of 3 to more polar colorless DNCCs, presumed to represent the oxidized 15‐HO‐ and 15‐MeO‐derivatives of 3 (see Scheme 3). The filtrate was diluted with an aqueous 5.5 % (v/v) solution of AcOH to induce acid‐induced elimination and to generate (after 4 h reaction at room temperature) a new yellow main product, identified as DYCC 4 (see Figure S1, Supporting Information). Workup of the reaction mixture (see Experimental Section) furnished 3.6 mg (5.8 μmol, 70 % yield) of yellow DYCC 4, which was characterized spectroscopically.
Figure 1 displays the absorption spectra of YCC 2 and of DYCC 4 in MeOH. In both spectra a strong absorption with a maximum near 428 nm was observed, indicating the presence of the same long‐wavelength absorbing chromophore, previously found in the YCC 2 15a and in the better known yellow bile component bilirubin.22 In DYCC 4, the α‐formyl‐pyrrole of ring A of 2 is replaced by an unsaturated lactam ring, manifesting itself by a marked decrease of the absorption at 310 nm, as well as by an increase of the absorption near 243 nm. Likewise, new strong bands in the circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of 4 near 320 nm and 250 nm, suggest a Cotton effect also originating from the structural and stereochemical differences associated with ring A (Figure 1). The new asymmetric carbon C4 in the DYCC 4 is tentatively assigned as R, based on the recent stereochemical assignment of C4 of DNCC 3.19 This asymmetric carbon center is lacking in the corresponding α‐formyl‐pyrrole unit in YCCs. The further asymmetric carbons C82 and C10 of DYCC 4 are inherited from the precursor, Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3), and their configuration is likely to be 82(S) and 10(R), as observed in YCC 2 16 and independently deduced for the NCCs 1 and 1‐epi.5
Figure 1.
UV/Vis absorption (top) and CD (bottom) spectra of DYCC 4 (red trace) and YCC 2 (black trace) in MeOH (1.5×10−5 m).
The molecular formula of DYCC 4 was established as C34H38N4O8 by ESI‐MS spectrometry, and the pseudomolecular ion [M+H]+ was observed at m/z=631.1 (Figure S2a,b, Supporting Information), confirming the formal loss of two hydrogen atoms when compared to Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3).19 The 1H NMR spectrum of DYCC 4 in CD3OD (500 MHz, 25 °C; Figure 2), showed the signals of 31 non‐exchangeable protons, among them three signals at intermediate field with the typical pattern of a vinyl group. The structure of 4 was deduced with the help of homo‐ and heteronuclear correlation NMR spectroscopic techniques, mainly (1H,1H COSY and ROESY, 1H,13C HSQC and HMBC (Figures 2 and 3, Table S1 in the Supporting Information). A singlet at 6.22 ppm, assigned to HC15, coupled with the unsaturated C15 at 102.3 ppm, a singlet of HC10 at 5.04 ppm correlated with C10 at 37.2 ppm (HSQC correlations). The methyl ester singlet of H3C85 at 3.77 ppm coupled to a carbonyl carbon at 171.3 ppm (HMBC). An AB spin system at 2.54 ppm and 3.09 ppm correlated with C5 at 29.9 ppm (HSQC) and was assigned to H2C5. It coupled with the multiplet of HC4 at 4.34 ppm in a 1H,1H COSY spectrum. Similarly, strong correlations of HC15 with the two nearby methyl groups H3C131 and H3C171 in a 1H,1H ROESY spectrum established the Z configuration at the C15=C16 bond and located the new chromophore to the left‐hand half of the molecule.
Figure 2.
500 MHz 1H NMR spectrum of DYCC 4 in CD3OD at 25 °C.
Figure 3.
Graphical NMR‐based analysis of the structure of the DYCC 4 (data from 500 MHz spectra in CD3OD, 25 °C). Left: 1H,1H homonuclear correlations from COSY spectra (bold bonds) and ROESY spectra (arrows). Right: 13C chemical shift assignments from 1H,13C heteronuclear correlations from HSQC spectra (shaded boxes) and HMBC‐spectra (arrows/ plain boxes).
1H NMR spectra of 4 and 2 in CD3OD and their chemical shift data from homo‐ and heteronuclear correlations were compared, as was done for solutions of 4 in [D6]‐DMSO (Figures S3 and S4, Supporting Information). The signals of HC10, HC82, the vinyl, ester methyl and three other CH3 groups showed comparable chemical shifts, and the signal of CHO of the formyl‐pyrrole unit of 2 was lacking in the spectrum of 4. However, the new ring A lactam moiety of 4 generated a new multiplet at δ=4.34 ppm for HC4, and induced low field shifts of H3C21, H2C5 and HN21. As deduced similarly from the absorption and CD spectra of 4 in MeOH or in MeCN, which display insignificant differences (Figure S5, Supporting Information), evidence for formation of H‐bonded dimers by intermolecular interaction, as seen for 2, was not observable for solutions of 4 in these two solvents. The preparation of DYCC 4 by oxidation with DDQ, an original method used for the synthesis of YCC 2 from NCC 1,15a was also explored here. However, under these experimentally demanding conditions, the conversion of 3 was incomplete (about 60 %) and the yield of 4 was low (22 % based on 3 converted) and the procedure was not optimized further (see Supporting Information for details).
Irradiation of a solution of 1.76 mg DYCC 4 (4Z) in 50 mL MeOH in a round bottom glass flask at room temperature with sunlight led to the formation of a second, more polar DYCC fraction (HPLC analysis), the 15E‐isomer 4E (Figure 4). Further irradiation with sun light (up to 255 min) did not significantly change the composition of the photolysis mixture that contained the two isomeric phylloxanthobilins in a molar ratio of about 3:5. The new fraction was an isomer of 4 according to its mass spectrum (Figure S7, Supporting Information). According to UV/Vis absorption and NMR spectra, the photoisomer of 4 was the double bond 15E‐isomer 4E. The absorption spectrum of 4E displayed similar characteristics near 430 nm as that of 15E‐isomer of the YCC 2 (but lacked the 1‐formyl pyrrole absorption band near 320 nm). In its NMR spectra, DYCC 4E showed diagnostic chemical shift values for the ring C/D moiety, as previously observed for the 15E‐isomer of YCC 2.16, 23 Furthermore, in a 600 MHz 1H,1H ROESY spectrum of 4E its low field singlet of HC15 at 6.38 ppm correlated strongly with the signal of H3C131 at 2.04 ppm (but only very weakly with H3C171 at 1.88 ppm), also supporting E‐configuration of the C15=C16 double bond (see Supporting Information and Figure S4). In the dark, solutions of 4E or 4Z in 1:1 ratio (v/v) of MeOH/25 mm phosphate buffer (pH7) equilibrated after storage at 23 °C for 8 days to about a 1:11 molar ratio 4E/4Z (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
When exposed to light, the DYCC 4 (4Z) isomerized to its less stable 15E‐isomer 4E, see scheme at the top. Bottom: Analyses by HPLC a fresh solution of DYCC 4 (black trace), after 25 min of irradiation with sunlight (red trace) and after storage of a solution of 4E (in MeOH/25 mm phosphate buffer, pH7) for 8 days in the dark at 23 °C (right). See Supporting Information for further details. Online UV/Vis absorption spectra of 4Z and 4E in the photolysis mixture are depicted at the bottom, left.
In senescent leaves and fruit chlorophyll catabolites accumulate as colorless, nonfluorescent bilin‐type tetrapyrroles, primarily.2b, 5 However, yellow type‐I PBs (YCCs),15a as well as pink colored type‐I PBs (PiCCs),23 have also been detected in extracts of senescent leaves17b, 24 and fruit,17a as products of endogenous oxidations of NCCs or YCCs, respectively. The regioselective formation of YCC 2 from the NCCs 1 and its C16 epimer was achieved by stereo‐selective oxidation with DDQ23 or with leaf extracts.15b The highly regioselective outcome of this transformation was ascribed to the reactivity of the donor‐substituted pyrrole unit (ring C) of NCCs. Here, the type‐II “nonfluorescent” Chl catabolite Vv‐DNCC‐51,19 in which rings A and D have similar constitutive features, was subjected to the “leaf” oxidation protocol15b, 16, 18 and, in an exploratory experiment, to (the less productive) DDQ′ oxidation.23 Indeed, oxidation occurred at the left‐hand half, as expected, generating DYCC 4 with its characteristic chromophore extending over the C/d‐moiety. Hence, the structures of YCC 2 and DYCC 4 differ by the chemical constitution of ring A, only. With Sp. wallisii leaf homogenates as oxidation medium, evidence for the intermediate formation of polar 15‐hydroxy‐ and/or 15‐methoxy‐substituted DNCCs as direct oxidation products was provided (HPLC; see Figure S1, Supporting Information). These oxidized DNCCs underwent acid‐induced elimination of H2O or MeOH at C15 and C16, respectively, to furnish the yellow dioxobilin‐type Chl catabolite 4. The “leaf” oxidation of Vv‐DNCC‐51 was about two‐to four times slower than the one of the NCC 1‐epi, making the overall preparative process somewhat slower with the DNCC, whereas the chemical yields were similar (nearly 70 %). Such oxidation reactions also occur slowly in (extracts of) naturally senescent grapevine leaves, in which Vv‐DYCC‐63 was detected,19 the structure of which was secured here by identification with DYCC 4 by HPLC (see Figure S8, Supporting Information).
Formation of a DYCC by oxidation of a DNCC (or of a YCC by oxidation of an NCC)15b desaturates the asymmetric C16 of these colorless phyllobilanes. Hence, the same YCC was obtained from C16 epimeric NCCs 1 and 1‐epi.15b DNCCs also occur in two C16 epimeric lines,19, 25 and C16 becomes pro‐chiral by the oxidation. However, C4 is a further asymmetric carbon center in DNCCs, not available in NCCs. The asymmetric C4 of Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3), which has tentatively been deduced to have R configuration,19 is a stereochemical result of the oxidative deformylation of an FCC‐precursor in leaves of V. vinifera.19 Consistent with a 4R configuration of 3, C4 of DYCC 4 and of its E isomer, 4E, are also tentatively assigned to have R configuration (see Scheme 3).
YCCs undergo air oxidation, providing pink colored PiCCs,5, 23, 26 which are selectively accessible from YCCs via their blue zinc complex.26, 27 Although the previously studied (colored) phyllochromobilins have all represented the formyloxobilin‐type,5 the synthetic availability of DYCCs opens a door now to studies of the structures, photochemistry, and antioxidant effects of yellow dioxobilin‐type PBs, as well as of their capacity for metal chelation and oxidation to corresponding DPiCCs.
In contrast to the situation with the YCC 2 and its methyl ester,16 as well as with a pyYCC,18 spectral data for DYCC 4 indicate little solvent and medium effects on spectra and structures, and no evidence for self‐assembly into dimeric structures was found for 4. This pointed to the importance of the intact formyl‐pyrrole unit (ring A) of YCCs for their assembly to H‐bonded and π‐stacked homodimers in nonpolar solvents.16, 18 Irradiation with sunlight of a solution of the DYCC 4 in MeOH converted 4 to a new and less stable DYCC cleanly and reversibly, identified as the 15E‐isomer 4E. Hence, by undergoing selective light‐induced E/Z‐isomerization of the C15=C16 bond, the DYCC 4 exhibits the same type of photo‐reactivity as YCCs in polar solvents.
The DYCC 4 represents a new type of phylloxanthobilin (PxB),5 that occurs in senescent leaves (and, possibly, in fruit) and may, hence, contribute to their colors.15a, 23 In analogy to NCCs,28 YCCs5 and bilirubin22 DYCCs are also a group of new potential natural anti‐oxidants that may help to prolong the viability of senescent leaf tissue.29 Formyloxobilin‐type PxBs, such as the YCC 2,5, 27 are unique photoswitches that feature an amazing structural similarity with some of the established heme‐derived bilins.30 Dioxobilin‐type PxBs, such as the DYCC 4, are even more closely related structurally to heme‐derived bilins, such as bilirubin (BR)22 and the growing range of blue‐absorbing tetrapyrrolic pigments in cyanobacteriochromes.31 Indeed, the left‐hand half of all known PxBs carries the chromophore of bilirubin.22 The occurrence of type‐II PBs in leaves and fruit, and their specific and effective biosynthetic production from the first formed type‐I PBs,11 support interest in searching for possible biological functions of PxBs,5 which may relate to the roles played by some heme‐derived bilins.22, 30, 32
Experimental Section
General: Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3)19 was from senescent leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). See SI for more details.
Spectroscopic characterization: See Supporting Information for details.
Preparation of DYCC (4) through “green” oxidation of Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3): A solution of Vv‐DNCC‐51 (3; 5.2 mg, 8.2 μmol) in 3 mL of MeOH and 2 mL of aq. phosphate buffer pH 5.2 was added to a freshly ground slurry obtained from 25 cm2 greenish Sp. wallisii leaves. The resulting mixture was stirred for 46 hours at 23 °C under 1 atm. O2 in the dark and then filtered through a celite pad (2 cm×1 cm). The filter cake was washed with 10 mL of MeOH. The filtrates were combined and washed with n‐hexane (4×10 mL) giving a light‐yellow solution that contained a polar DNCC fraction (HPLC). The combined filtrate was diluted with 30 mL of 5.5 % (pH 2.0) aqueous AcOH. After 4 hours stirring under N2, the reaction mixture was worked up (see Supporting Information for details), furnishing 3.6 mg (70 % yield) of DYCC 4 as a yellow powder. UV/Vis (MeOH, c=1.5×10−5 m): λ (log ϵ) 428 (4.60), 283 (4.10), 243 nm (4.48). CD (1.5×10−5 m, in MeOH): λ min/max (Δϵ): 433 (0.4), 310 (1.7), 284 (−3.0), 246 nm (−4.0); for 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S1 (Supporting Information); ESI‐MS (positive ion mode): m/z (%)=1285.1 (15), 1284.1 (35), 1283.1 (50; [2 M+Na]+), 1262.0 (24), 1260.9 (18; [2 m+H]+), 691.0 (23; [M−H+Na+K]+), 675.1 (14; [M−H+2 Na]+), 671.1 (13), 670.0 (25), 669.1 (64; [M+K]+),655.3 (10), 654.2 (34), 653.3 (100; [M+Na]+), 633.2 (7), 632.1 (22), 631.1 (50; [M+H]+) (see Figure S2, Supporting Information).
Preparative photolytic isomerization of DYCC 4 (4Z) to its 15E‐isomer 4E: 1.76 mg (2.8 μmol) of DYCC 4 in 50 mL deoxygenated MeOH were exposed to sunlight at ambient temperature for 20 min. Work‐up and separation of the two main components furnished 0.40 μmol of 4E and 1.07 μmol of 4Z were recuperated (see Supporting Information for details). DYCC photoisomer 4E: UV/Vis (MeOH, c=4.9×10−5 m): λ max (log ϵ)=206 (4.72), 246 sh (4.43), 278 (4.24), 434 nm (4.46). CD (MeOH, c=4.9×10−5 m): λ max (Δϵ)=457 (2.4), 313 (5.2), 289 (−14.1), 266 (−2.6), 248 (−10.5), 227 nm (3.6); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD, 0 °C): δ=1.78 (s, H3C21), 1.88 (s, H3C171), 2.04 (s, H3C131), 2.11 (s, H3C71), 2.37 (t, H2C122), 2.50 (HAC31), 2.72 (m, HAC121), 2.78 (m, HBC121, HBC31), 3.12 (AB system, J AB=4.4 Hz, H2C5), 3.70 (m, H2C32), 3.76 (s, H3C85), 4.32 (m, HC4), 4.99 (s, HC10), 5.37 (dd, J=2.3/11.7 Hz, HAC182), 6.15 (dd, J=2.3/17.7 Hz, HBC182), 6.38 (s, HC15), 6.54 ppm (dd, J=16.6/17.6 Hz, HC181);13C NMR (150 MHz, CD3OD, 0 °C): δ=8.3 (21), 9.4 (71), 9.7 (131), 12.5 (171), 21.7 (121), 30.0 (5), 30.5 (31), 37.0 (10), 39.8 (122), 52.6 (85), 60.4 (4), 60.8 (32), 67.5 (82), 107.7 (15), 112.6 (7), 119.5 (182), 122.1 (14), 122.4 (12), 124.4 (13), 125.5 (8), 127.3 (181), 129.1 (11), 129.3 (18), 130.4 (2), 134.5 (6), 137.1 (16), 140.1 (17), 155.8 (3), 160.9 (9), 171.2 (83), 171.4 (19), 176.1 (1), 181.5 ppm (123); online ESI‐MS m/z (%): 685.2 (6), 669.2 (73; [M+K]+, 647.3 (7), 633.3 (6), 632.3 (36), 631.3 (95; C34H39N4O8 +, [M+H]+), 601.3 (5), 600.3 (36), 599.3 (100; [M−CH3OH+H]+), 566.4 (6), 490.2 (11; [M−C7H11NO2+H]+), 458.2 (24; [M−CH3OH−C7H11NO2+H]+).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supplementary
Acknowledgements
We thank Thomas Müller, Christoph Kieninger, Christoph Kreutz, and Gerhard Scherzer (Innsbruck) for help with mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy and HPLC analyses. We also thank Michael Oberhuber and Peter Robatscher and their team (Research Center Laimburg, Italy) for a generous supply with senescent Chardonnay leaves. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, I‐563 and P‐28522).
C. Li, T. Erhart, X. Liu, B. Kräutler, Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 4052.
Dedicated to Professor Duilio Arigoni on the occasion of his 90th birthday
References
- 1.
- 1a. Hendry G. A. F., Houghton J. D., Brown S. B., New Phytol. 1987, 107, 255–302; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1b. Matile P., Chimia 1987, 41, 376–381; [Google Scholar]
- 1c. Kräutler B., Jaun B., Bortlik K., Schellenberg M., Matile P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1315–1318; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 1354–1357. [Google Scholar]
- 2.
- 2a. Hörtensteiner S., Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 505–517; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2b. Hörtensteiner S., Kräutler B., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1807, 977–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kräutler B., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6227–6238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kräutler B., Hörtensteiner S. in Handbook of Porphyrin Science, Vol. 28 (Eds.: G. C. Ferreira, K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith, R. Guilard), World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, 2013, pp. 117–185. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kräutler B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4882–4907; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 4964–4990. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kräutler B., Mühlecker W., Anderl M., Gerlach B., Helv. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 1355–1362. [Google Scholar]
- 7.
- 7a. Hörtensteiner S., Wüthrich K. L., Matile P., Ongania K. H., Kräutler B., J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 15335–15339; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7b. Pružinska A., Tanner G., Anders I., Roca M., Hörtensteiner S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15259–15264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.
- 8a. Rodoni S., Vicentini F., Schellenberg M., Matile P., Hörtensteiner S., Plant Physiol. 1997, 115, 677–682; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8b. Rodoni S., Mühlecker W., Anderl M., Kräutler B., Moser D., Thomas H., Matile P., Hörtensteiner S., Plant Physiol. 1997, 115, 669–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.
- 9a. Mühlecker W., Ongania K. H., Kräutler B., Matile P., Hörtensteiner S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 401–404; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 401–404; [Google Scholar]
- 9b. Hörtensteiner S., Rodoni S., Schellenberg M., Vicentini F., Nandi O. I., Qui Y. L., Matile P., Plant Biol. 2000, 2, 63–67; [Google Scholar]
- 9c. Mühlecker W., Kräutler B., Moser D., Matile P., Hörtensteiner S., Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 278–286. [Google Scholar]
- 10.
- 10a. Oberhuber M., Berghold J., Breuker K., Hörtensteiner S., Kräutler B., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6910–6915; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10b. Oberhuber M., Berghold J., Kräutler B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3057–3061; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 3100–3104. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Christ B., Süssenbacher I., Moser S., Bichsel N., Egert A., Müller T., Kräutler B., Hörtensteiner S., Plant Cell 2013, 25, 1868–1880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Süssenbacher I., Hörtensteiner S., Kräutler B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13777–13781; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 13981–13985. [Google Scholar]
- 13.
- 13a. Losey F. G., Engel N., J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 8643–8647; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13b. Müller T., Rafelsberger M., Vergeiner C., Kräutler B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10724–10727; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 10912–10916; [Google Scholar]
- 13c. Ríos J. J., Pérez-Gálvez A., Roca M., Food Res. Int. 2014, 65, 255–262; [Google Scholar]
- 13d. Ríos J. J., Roca M., Pérez-Gálvez A., J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 10576–10584; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13e. Roiser M., Müller T., Kräutler B., J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 1385–1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kräutler B., Matile P., Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
- 15.
- 15a. Moser S., Ulrich M., Müller T., Kräutler B., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2008, 7, 1577–1581; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15b. Vergeiner C., Ulrich M., Li C. J., Liu X. J., Müller T., Kräutler B., Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 136–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li C. J., Wurst K., Jockusch S., Gruber K., Podewitz M., Liedl K. R., Kräutler B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15760–15765; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 15992–15997. [Google Scholar]
- 17.
- 17a. Roca M., Rios J. J., Chahuaris A., Perez-Galvez A., Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 332–338; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17b. Wakana D., Kato H., Momose T., Sasaki N., Ozeki Y., Goda Y., Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 2982–2985. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Li C. J., Wurst K., Berghold J., Podewitz M., Liedl K. R., Kräutler B., Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 2987–2998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Erhart T., Mittelberger C., Liu X. J., Podewitz M., Li C. J., Scherzer G., Stoll G., Valls J., Robatscher P., Liedl K. R., Oberhuber M., Kräutler B., Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 17268–17279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Roca M., Ríos J. J., Pérez-Gálvez A., Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 17, 453–468. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Djapic N., Djuric A., Pavlovic A., Res. J. Agr. Sci. 2009, 41, 256–260. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lightner D. A., Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products, Vol. 98, Springer, Wien, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ulrich M., Moser S., Müller T., Kräutler B., Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 2330–2334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Scherl M., Müller T., Kräutler B., Chem. Biodiversity 2012, 9, 2605–2617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Süßenbacher I., Christ B., Hörtensteiner S., Kräutler B., Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 87–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Li C. J., Ulrich M., Liu X. J., Wurst K., Müller T., Kräutler B., Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3388–3395. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Li C. J., Kräutler B., Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 10116–10127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Müller T., Ulrich M., Ongania K.-H., Kräutler B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8699–8702; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 8854–8857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Matile P., Exp. Gerontol. 2000, 35, 145–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Falk H., Chemistry of Linear Oligopyrroles: Bile Pigments, Springer, Wien, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 31.
- 31a. Rockwell N. C., Shelley S. M., Lagarias J. C., Biochemistry 2012, 51, 3576–3585; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31b. Ma Q., Hua H. H., Chen Y., Liu B. B., Kramer A. L., Scheer H., Zhao K. H., Zhou M., FEBS J. 2012, 279, 4095–4108; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31c. Ikeuchi C. M., Ishizuka T., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2008, 7, 1159–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Frankenberg N., Lagarias J. C. in The Porphyrin Handbook, Vol. 13, (Eds.: K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith, R. Guilard), Elsevier, Oxford, 2003, pp. 211–235. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supplementary