Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry
. 1975 Sep-Oct;79A(5):641–650. doi: 10.6028/jres.079A.025

Barothermal Theory of Two Devices for Measuring Absorption Coefficients

H S Bennett 1
PMCID: PMC6565417  PMID: 32184522

Abstract

Two devices are proposed for measuring absorption coefficients in weakly absorbing materials. The first device measures cylindrical samples and the second device measures flat plate or disk samples. This paper reports on the derivations for the steady-state and transient solutions to the heat diffusion equations which describe the barothermal behavior of the two proposed devices. In addition, Green’s function techniques are used to describe the cyclic heating and cooling of the cylinders and plates.

Keywords: Absorption coefficients, barothermaĺ behavior, Green’s function, heat diffusion, weakly absorbing materials

1. Introduction

Optical communications, integrated optics, and high power lasers are developing technologies which depend in part upon highly transparent solids. For example, optical communication systems use optical fibers with absorption coefficients which are less than 10−4cm−1 at operating wavelengths [1].1 Continuing further advances in these technologies and determining the absorption mechanisms in highly transparent materials require improved methods for measuring very small absorption coefficients.

Four general techniques for measuring absorption coefficients exist. These techniques involve respectively calorimetry, spectrophotometry, emissivity, and gas pressure measurements.

In the calorimetric technique, one measures the temperature rise of the solid which occurs when a fraction of the energy in a beam of radiation is absorbed. When the temperature rise, reflectivity, and laser power are known to within an accuracy of 1 percent, this method is capable of giving absorption coefficients on the order of 10−4 cm−1 within an accuracy of a few percent. This method then has reasonably high sensitivity, and requires laser beam powers of the order of tens of mW for absorption coefficients of the order of 10−3 cm−1. It also is insensitive to those scattering centers which do not absorb any of the radiation. However, the sample must be contacted with thermo-couples to measure its temperature and the absorption coefficient can be determined only at those wavelengths for which sufficiently powerful lasers are available.

The second technique involves measuring the transmission loss of a beam of radiation passing through the solid. Variations of this technique include either a single beam or double beam spectrophotometer and may use samples of two different lengths. Double beam methods using samples of different lengths give products of the absorption coefficients α with the sample thickness d as small as αd ~ 0.002 with an accuracy of ±0.0002. The photometric technique has the advantage of using light sources with continuous values of wavelengths present; but it has the disadvantages that sample preparation is important to avoid surface scratches and dust and that the samples should noU have scattering centers such as inclusions.

In the third technique one measures the emission of the sample at a given temperature and compares it directly to a blackbody at the same temperature. When the product αd is very small, the emittance E (the ratio of thermal radiation per unit area emitted by the sample to that emitted by a blackbody at the same temperature) becomes E ~ αd. For values of αd less than 0.001, the emittance measurements can be more sensitive for determining α than the photometric measurements. In addition, by this technique, one can obtain values of absorption coefficients over a continuous range of wavelengths. But exceptional temperature control is essential to achieve such sensitivity.

In the fourth technique, the energy absorbed from a beam of radiation passing through the sample produces heat. The heat then diffuses from the solid to a non-absorbing, confined gas which is adjacent to the sample. The heat transfer process leads to a pressure rise in the gas. Because this technique tends to average over any absorption inhomogeneities in the sample, we also expect that localized absorbing or scattering centers could be less of a problem for this technique than for the calorimetric techniques in which the placement of thermocouples may be important.

To develop further this last technique, Bennett and Forman recently proposed alternative ways to measure very small absorption coefficients. They considered in a series of papers [26] both barothermal and photo-acoustic modes of operation for devices to characterize weakly absorbing materials. In these papers, they cited only the results for the solutions to the heat diffusion equations which describe the behavior of the proposed devices. They did not derive the solutions because they wanted to stress in those papers the major conclusions for designing absorption devices with optimum performance.

Figures 1 and 2, respectively, show schematics of their proposed devices for measuring absorption coefficients of long cylindrical samples and of thin disk or plate-shaped samples. Each of these devices has a characteristic frequency which is related to the inverse of the time required for transferring a heat pulse from the solid to the gas. The barothermal mode of operation occurs whenever the modulation frequency of the beam of radiation is less than the characteristic frequency of the device; and the photoacoustic mode of operation occurs whenever the modulation frequency of the beam of radiation is greater than the characteristic frequency of the device [7].

Figure 1. Schematic of an absorption measuring device (barothermal) for long cylindrical samples.

Figure 1.

Insulating annuli support coaxially the long cylindrical transparent sample of radius rs inside a larger cylinder of radius ri. A confined nonabsorbing gas at ambient pressure T0 fills the space between the two cylinders. The walls of the outer cylinder are at a constant temperature T0. A collimated beam of radiation, such as a laser beam, propagates coaxially through the cylindrical sample. The beam of radiation has a power Wi and an effective radius rl. A pressure transducer, which is not shown, monitors the pressure at the heat sink — gas interface.

Figure 2. Schematic of an absorption measuring cell (barothermal) for plate-shaped samples.

Figure 2.

A confined, nonabsorbing gas at ambient pressure p0 fills the space inside the cell between two windows. The walls of the cell may have a polygonal or circular cross section. The windows which enclose the gas at each end of the cell are made from the weakly absorbing material under investigation. The external faces of the two windows are at a constant temperature T0 A collimated beam of radiation, such as a laser beam, with power Wl and effective radius rl propagates along the z direction through the pressure cell and its windows. A pressure transducer, which is not shown, measures the pressure in the gas at |z|⩽z2.

In this paper, the author gives derivations for the steady-state and transient solutions to the heat diffusion equations which describe the barothermal behavior of the two proposed devices. The equations which describe the photoacoustic behavior of the devices are derived in (separate papers [4, 6]).

The steady-state and transient solutions for cylindrical samples are derived here, respectively, in section 2 and section 3; and the steady-state and transient solutions for disk or plate-shaped samples are derived, respectively, in section 4 and section 5. The Green’s functions which describe the cyclic heating and cooling of the cylinders and plates are constructed in section 6. And finally, frequently occurring integrals involving the eigenfunctions for the equations are given in appendix A for cylinders and in appendix B for disks or plates.

2. Steady-State Solution — Cylinder

From [3], the steady-state temperature v(r) satisfies the following heat diffusion equations for the proposed device in figure 1: When 0 ⩽ r ⩽ rs,

ksd2vs(r)dr2+ksrdvs(r)dr+Qs(r)ρsCs=0; (1)

and when rs ⩽ r=⩽ ri,

kgd2vg(r)dr2+kgrdvg(r)dr=0. (2)

The temperature in the solid ίs vs(r) and the temperature in the gas is vg(r). The power absorbed per unit volume in the solid is

Qs(r)={Ql for 0rrlrs0 for r>ri, (3)

where Ql=αsWl/πrl2, αs is the absorption coefficient of the solid, Wl is the power of the beam of radiation, and rl is the effective radius of the collimated beam. The radius of the cylindrical sample is rs and the radius of the outer cylinder (heat sink) is ri. The thermal diffusivity k = K|ρC, where K is the thermal conductivity, ρ is the density, and C is the specific heat at constant volume. The subscript s denotes quantities for the solid and the subscript g denotes quantities for the gas.

The boundary conditions are that

vg(ri)=T0, (4)

where T0 is t he temperature of the heat sink. Continuity of temperature across the solid-gas interface at r= rs gives,

vs(rs)=vg(rs), (5)

and conservation of heat flow across the solid-gas interface at r=rs gives,

Ksdvsdr|r=rs=Kgdvgdr|r=rs. (6)

Rearranging eq (1) and eq (2) yields, respectively,

ddr(rdvsdr)=rQs(r)Ks (7)

and

ddr(rdvgdr)=0; (8)

and integrating these equations twice yields the steady state solutions;

vs(r)=vs(0)Ql4Ks{r2 for 0rrlrl2[1+2 ln (r/rl)] for rlrrs (9)

and

vg(r)=C1g ln r+C2g for rs  rri, (10)

where C1g and C2g are constants of integration and where the limit that

Lim r0rdvsdr=0 (11)

is invoked to obtain eq (9) (i.e., that vs remains finite at r = 0).

Boundary conditions (4), (5), and (6) require that the temperature at the center of the cylinder r = 0 is

vs(0)=T0+Qlrl24Ks{12KsKg ln (rsri)+2 ln (rsrl)}, (12)

and that the temperature in the gas is

vg(r)=T0Qlrl22Kg ln (rri). (13)

3. Transient Solution — Cylinder

The transient temperature u(r, t) for times t ≥ 0 is given in [3] by the diffusion equations

ks2r2us(r,t)+ksrus(r,t)r=us(r,t)t (14)

and

kg2r2ug(r,t)+kgrug(r,t)r=ug(r,t)t. (15)

At time t = 0,·the sum of the transient and steady-state temperatures is everywhere equal to the ambient temperature T0,

T(r,0)=u(r,0)+v(r)=T0; (16)

and at any time t the temperature at the heat sink r = ri is T0, i.e.,

ug(ri,t)=0, (17)

because

Lim tu(r,t)=0,

by the definition of transient solutions and because Vg(ri) = T0.

A general separable solution to an equation having the form of either eq (14) or (15) is

u(r,t)=R(r)τ(t)=[AJ0(ξr)+BY0(ξr)]exp (ξ2kt), (18)

where Jn is the nth order Bessel function of the first kind, Yn is the nth order Bessel function of the second kind [8], ξ is the constant of separation, and A and B are constants. The quantities A, B, ξ, and k have the subscript s for the solid and the subscript g for the gas.

Equation (17) states that

Rg(ri)=0, (19)

and the temperature continuity equation at r=rs, requires that

Rs(rs)=Rg(rs) (20)

and

ξs2=(kg/ks)ξg2. (21)

Also, the constant Bs = 0 because the temperature must be finite for all r ≥ 0 and t.

Hence, the conservation of heat flow across the solid-gas interface

Ksur(r,t)/r|r=rs=Kgug(r,t)/r|r=rs (22)

and the other boundary conditions eq (19) and eq (20) yield three homogeneous simultaneous equations for the three unknowns As, Ag, and Bg,. Solutions for this set of three equations exist if and only if the determinant,D, of their coefficients vanishes; the vanishing of the determinant yields the eigenvalues ξg=ξj, where j= 1, 2…. The jth eigenvalue ξj is that value of ξg for which the determinant vanishes for the jth time, i.e., ξjj +1; namely, det D(ξj)= 0, where

D=|0J0(ξgri)J0(ξsrs)J0(ξgrs)KsξsJ1(ξsrs)KgξgJ1(ξgrs)Y0(ξgri)Y0(ξgrs)KgξgY1(ξgrs)| (23)

The eigenvalues ξj also determine the characteristic times tj for the solid-gas system; namely,

tj=(ξj2kg)1. (24)

Expressing As and Bg in terms of Aj = Ag, we obtain,

Rs(r)=j=1AjF0(ξj,ri,rs){J0(ξ¯jr)/J0(ξ¯jrs)}, (25)

for 0 ⩽ rrs and

Rg(r)=j=1AjF0(ξj,ri,r)

for rs ⩽, rri’· where ξ¯j2=(kg/ks)ξj2 and where the function Fn is

Fn(ξg,ri,r)={Y0(ξgri)Jn(ξgr)J0(ξgri)Yn(ξgr)}/Y0(ξgri). (27)

Relations (25), (26), and (27) are valid only if J0jri) 0 and Y0jri) 0.

In terms of the functions Fn (ξ, ri, r), the eigenvalue equation satisfied by the eigenvalue ξj becomes,

KsξjJ1(ξ¯jrs,F0(ξ¯j,ri,rs)KgξjJ0(ξ¯jrs)F1(ξ,ri,rs)=0.

We determine the coefficients Aj by using the t = 0 relations obtained from eq (16); namely,

Rs(r)=T0vs(r)  for 0rrs (28)

and

Rg(r)=T0vg(r)  for rs  rri. (29)

First, we consider the eigenfunctions for the solid-gas system

E0(ξj,ri,r)={F0(ξj,ri,rs){J0(ξ¯jr)/J0(ξ¯jrs)} for 0rrsF0(ξj,ri,r) for rsrri. (30)

Next, we multiply both sides of eq (28) and eq (29) by

KsksrE0(ξi,ri,r)  when 0rrs

and by

KgkgrE0(ξi,ri,r)        when rsrri

and then we integrate the resulting expressions over the interval 0 ⩽ rri. This procedure yields the following expression for the coefficients Aj

j=1AjΔ(ξj,ξi)=Ksks[{T0vs(0)}0rsE0(ξi,ri,r)rdr+Ql4Ks{0rlE0(ξi,ri,r)rdr+rl2rlrs{1+2 ln (r/rl)}E0(ξi,ri,r)r3dr}]+Kgkg[Qlrl22Kgrsri ln (r/ri)E0(ξi,ri,r)rdr]. (31)

where

Δ(ξj,ξi)=Ksks0rsE0(ξj,ri,r)E0(ξi,ri,r)rdr+KgkgrsriE0(ξj,ri,r)E0(ξi,ri,r)rdr. (32)

Appendix A contains the evaluations of the several integrals which occur in eq (31) and eq (32). Using eq (A4) and the fact that dB0(ξr)ldr= — B1(ξr), we find that Δ j, ξj) vanishes unless ξj = ξi; and when ξj = ξi the factor A j, ξj) = Δj becomes

Δj=Kgrs22kg[(KskgKgks1)F02(ξj,ri,rs)+(ri2/rs2)F12(ξj,ri,ri)+(KgKs1)F12(ξj,ri,rs)]. (33)

Applying eqs (A1) to (A3) to the right-hand side of eq (31), we obtain, after several steps, an expression for the coefficients Aj, namely,

Aj=Qlrlksξ¯j3J1(ξ¯rl)F0(ξj,ri,rs)ΔjJ0(ξ¯jrs). (34)

Because we sum in the computer program used in [3] a finite number of terms in such expressions as eq (25) and eq (26), we normalize the Aj’s for 1 ⩽ jN by using the relation (29) evaluated at r= rs. To accomplish this normalization, we introduce the normalization factor aN and replace Aj with aNAj(N) in the relation (29). This then gives us an expression for the factor aN; namely,

aN=Qlrl22Kg ln (rsri)/j=1NAj(N)F0(ξj,ri,rs). (35)

4. Steady-State Solution — Plate

From [5], the steady-state temperature v(z) satisfies the following heat diffusion equations for the proposed device in figure 2:

When z2 ⩽ | z| ⩽ z3

2z2vs(z)+QlKs=0  ; (36)

and when |Z| ⩽ z2,

2z2vg(z)=0. (37)

The temperature in the cell windows is vs(z) and the temperature in the gas is vg(z). The power absorbed per unit volume in the cell windows is Qι=αs|πr2ι. The absorption coefficient of the windows is αs.

The boundary conditions are that

vs(±z3)=T0, (38)

where T0 is the ambient temperature. Continuity of temperature and conservation of heat flow across the solid-gas interface at z = ±z2 give, respectively,

vs(±z2)=vg(±z2) (39)

and

Ksdvs/dz|z=±z2=Kgdvg/dz|z=±z2. (40)

We integrate eqs (36) and (37) twice to obtain the general solutions,

vs(z)=(Qlz2/2Ks)+Cs|z|+Ds, (41)

and

vs(z)=Cg|z|+Dg, (42)

where the C’s and D’s are constants of integration.

The absolute value of z occurs in eqs (41) and (42) because v(z) = v(-z) when αs |z3z2| ⪡ 1. Also, because dvg(z)/dz | z=0+ = Cg and dvg(z)/dz| z=0 = — Cg, the constant Cg must be zero. (If Cg were not zero, then a heat sink or heat source would exist at z =0. This is not the case for the proposed device).

The boundary condition (38) at z = z3 and the boundary conditions (39) and (40) at z = z2 yield three inhomogeneous equations for the three unknown coefficients Cs·, Ds, and Dg namely,

Csz3+Ds=T0+(Qlz32/2Ks),Dg+Csz2+Ds=(Qlz22/2Ks),CsKs=Qlz2. (43)

A solution for the three equations exists if the determinant of their coefficients does not vanish; i.e.,

det (0z311z210Ks0)=Ks0. (44)

Using the matrix method to solve the set of equations (43), we obtain the steady-state temperature:

vs(z)=T0+(Ql/Ks)[z3{(z3/2)z2}|z|{(|z|/2)z2}], (45)

for z2 ⩽ |z| ⩽ z3, and

vg(z)=T0+(Ql/2Ks)(z3z2)2 (46)

for |z| ⩽ z2.

5. Transient Solution — Plate

The transient solution u(z, t) for times t ≥ 0 satisfies the following heat diffusion equations: [5]

2z2us(z,t)=1ksus(z,t)t (47)

for z2 ⩽|z| ⩽ z3, and

2z2ug(z,t)=1kgug(z,t)t (48)

for |z| ⩽ z2

At time t= 0, the sum of the transient and steady-state temperature at the exterior sides of the cell windows at |z|=z3 is T0, i.e.,

us(±z3,t)=0, (49)

because

Lim tu(z,t)=0 (50)

by the definition of transient behavior and because vs(±z3) = T0.

General separable solutions to eqs (47) and (48) are

u(z,t)=R(z)τ(t)

where

R(z)=[A  exp  (iξz)+B  exp   (iξz)]

and

τ(t)=exp  (ξ2kt).

The constant of separation is ξ and the coefficients A and B are constants. The subscripts s and g denote the quantities A, B, ξ, and k respectively for the windows and for the gas.

Equation (49) gives us that

Rs(±z3)=0. (51)

The continuity of temperature across the interfaces at |z | = z2 requires that

Rs(±z2)=Rg(±z2)

and

ξs2=(kg/ks)ξg2. (52)

In addition, the conservation of heat flow across the window-glass interface at |z| = z2 requires that

Ks(dRs/dz)|z=±z2=Kg(dRg/dz)|z=±z2. (53)

Hence, the boundary conditions (51), (52), and (53) yield six homogeneous simultaneous equations for the six unknown coefficients As>,Bs>,Ag,Bg,As<, and Bs< where the superscripts < and > are, respectively, for z < 0 and z >0. Because As<=Bs>,Bs<=As> by symmetry, these six equations reduce to three equations in three unknowns. As=As>,Bs=Bs> Solutions for this set of equations exist if, and only if, the determinant D of their coefficients vanishes. The vanishing of the determinant yields the eigenvaluesξg = ξj, where j = l,2,3,… ∞.

They jth eigenvalue ξj is that value of ξg for which the determinant vanishes for the jth time, i.e., ξjj+1; namely,

det D(ξj)=0, (54)

where

D=(0exp (iξsz3)cos (ξgz2)exp (iξsz2)ξgKg sin (ξgz2)iξsKs exp (iξsz2)exp (iξsz3)exp (iξsz2)iξsKs exp (iξsz2)) (55)

and ξs2=(kg/ks)ξg2. From eqs (54) and (55), the eigenvalue ξj satisfies the following equation

(Kg/kg1/2) sin (ξgz2) sin (ξsd)=(Ks/ks1/2) cos (ξgz2) cos (ξsd), (56)

Where ξg = ξj and d = (z3z2).

Expressing As Bs in terms of A = A j, we have

Rg(z)=j=1Aj cos (ξjz) for |z|z2 (57)

and

Rs(z)=j=1Aj cos (ξjz2)2 sin2(ξjd){ cos (ξj(|z|z2)) cos (ξj(|z|+z22z3))} (58)

for z2 ⩽ |z| ⩽ z3,Whereξj=(kg/ks)1/2ξj.

We determine the coefficients Aj by using the t = 0 relations obtained from eq (49); namely,

Rs(z)=T0vs(z) for z2|z|z3 (59)

and

Rg(z)=T0vg(z) for |z|z2. (60)

Equations (57) and (58) contain the eigenfunctions for the window-gas system; namely,

E(j,z)={ cos (ξjz) cos (ξjz2) for |z|z2 { cos (ξj(|z|z2)) cos (ξj(|z|+z22z3))}2 sin2(ξJd)for z2|z|z3. (61)

We multipfy both sides of eqs (59) and (60) by

Kg(ks/kg)1/2E(j,z)  when z2|z|z3

and by

Ks(kg/ks)1/2E(j,z)  when |z|z3,

and we integrate the resulting expressions respectively over the intervals 0 ⩽ z ⩽ z2 and z2 ⩽ z ⩽ z3. This procedure gives us the following expression for the coefficients Aj:

j=1AjΔ(ξj,ξi)=(T0Dg)Kg(ks/kg)1/20z2E(i,z)dz+(Ql/Ks)Ks(kg/ks)1/2z2z3[z{(z/2)z2}z3{(z3/2)z2}]E(i,z)dz (62)

where

Δ(ξj,ξi)=Kg(ks/kg)1/20z2E(j,z)E(i,z)dz+Ks(kg/ks)1/2z2z3E(j,z)E(i,z)dz. (63)

Appendix B contains the evaluations of the several integrals which occur in eqs (62) and (63). Using eq (B4) gives us that Δj ξi) vanishes unless ξj = ξi·And when ξji, the factor Δ(ξj, ξj) = Δj becomes from eq (B5)

Δj=Kg(ks/kg)1/22[z2+{Kskgd cos2(ξjz2)/Kgks sin2(ξjd)}]. (64)

Applying eq (B1) through eq (B3) repeatedly to the right-hand side of eq (62) gives us an expression for the coefficients Aj; namely,

Aj=(KgksQl/ξj3KskgΔj){(ks/kg)1/2 sin (ξjz2)(Ks cos (ξjz2)/Kg sin (ξjd)}. (65)

Because the computer program in [5] evaluates a finite number of terms in such expressions as eq (57) and eq (58), the coefficients Aj are normalized for 1 ⩽ jN by using the relation (60) evaluated at z = z2. Replacing Aj, with aNAj (N) in relation (60), one obtains an expression for the normalization factor aN,

aN=(Qld2/2Ks)j=1NAj(N) cos (ξjz2) (66)

6. Cyclic Heating and Cooling

The Green’s function method offers a convenient way for computing the response of the proposed barothermal devices when the beam of radiation is turned on at t = 0 and is modulated at angular frequency ω for all times t ≥ 0 We express the power absorbed per unit volume Qi(t) by the expression,

Ql(t)=η(t)η(rlr)Ql(1+m  cos  ωt), (67)

where |m| ⩽ 1 is the modulation factor for cyclic heating and cooling and where ω is less than the characteristic frequency of the system. The step function η(x) is zero for x ⩽ 0 and 1 for x > 0.

6.1. Cylinder

The temperature T(r0, t0) = u(r0, t0)+v(r0)—T0, satisfies the heat diffusion for the cylinder and the gas; namely, for times t ≥ 0

02T(r0,t0)k1(T(r0,t0)/t0)=ρ(r0,t0); (68)

where ρ(r0, t0) =η (rι — ro) (Qι/Ks) (l + m cos ωt) for rlrs where 02 because the temperature does not depend upon angle θ0 and coordinate z0; and where k is subscripted with s when 0 ⩽ r0rsand with g when rsr0ri. We subtract the ambient temperature T0 from the temperature for later convenience in using the boundary condition T(ri. i) = 0.

The Green’s function G(r, t| r0, t0) for the system satisfies the equation

2G(r,t|r0,t0)k1G(r,t|r0,t0)/t=δ(rr0)δ(tt0)r(K/k), (69)

where k and K are subscripted with s when 0 ⩽ rrs and with g when rsrri. We interpret G to be the temperature which occurs at r and t when an impulse source of heat is introduced at r0 and t0.

The Green’s function satisfies a causality condition:

G(r,t|r0,t0,)=0   if t<t0. (70)

In addition, it satisfies a reciprocity condition under time reversal because the causality condition (70) requires a time sequence

G(r,t|r0,t0)=G(r0,t0|r,t), (71)

where the function G(r,t|r0,t0) gives the temperature at r0 and − t0 due to a source impulse at r and— t. Because –t0>-t, the time sequence is properly ordered. Hence, from eq (71) we have that

02G(r,t|r0,t0)+k1G(r,t|r0,t0)/t0=δ(rr0)δ(tt0)r0(K/k), (72)

where k and K are subscripted with s when 0 ⩽ r0rs and with g when rsr0ri.

We shall now express the solutions of the inhomogeneous diffusion eq (68) for the solid and gas in terms of the Green’s function G. We first multiply eq (68) by G(r, t|r0, t0) and eq (72) by T(r0,t0) and then subtract the first product-equation from the second product-equation. Keeping in mind that the thermal factor for the solid (Ks | ks) differs from the thermal factor for the gas (Kg | kg), we integrate the above result over the time domain0 ⩽ t0t —+ and over the volume of the solid-gas system.

dV()=0rs()(Ks/ks)r0dr0+rsri()(Kg/kg)r0dr0,

where t+=limϵ0t+ϵ.

The differential form of Green’s theorem for our special case,

r0(T02GG02T)=r0(Tr0Gr0)r0(Gr0TT0), (73)

enables us to express the temperature in terms of the Green’s function. The final result becomes

η(r)η(rsr)Ts(r,t)+η(rrs)η(rir)Tg(r,t)=0t+dt0Ksks0rsρ(r0,t0)G(r,t|r0,t0)r0dr0+0t+dt0Kgkgrsriρ(r0,t0)G(r,t|r0,t0)r0dr0, (74)

where we have used the following initial conditions and boundary conditions:

Ts(r,0)=0,Tg(r,0)=0,G(r,t|r0,t+)=0
Ts(rs,t)=Tg(rs,t),Tg(ri,t)=0,
ks1G(r,t|rs,t0)=kg1G(r,t|rs+,t0),
G(r,t|ri,t0)=0,

KsTs/r0|r0=rs=kgTg/r0|r0=rs, and

Ksks1G(r,t|r0,t0)/r0|r0=rs=Kgkg1G(r,t|r0,t0)/r0|r0=rs+.

We now proceed to construct the Green’s function G(r, t/r0,to). Referring to eqs (30), (32), and (33), we have that the spatial eigenfunctions of the solid-gas system are

Wj(r)={(Ks/ksΔj)1/2E0(ξj,ri,r) for 0rrs(Kg/kgΔj)1/2E0(ξj,ri,r) for rsrri, (75)

where

0rirdrWj1(r)Wj2(r)=δj1,j2;
j=1Wj(r)Wj(r0)={η(r)η(rsr)(Ks/ks)+η(rrs)η(rir)(Kg/kg)}r1δ(rr0),

and 2Wj(r)+ξj2Wj(r)=0.

Hence, we may expand the Green’s function in terms of the above eigenfunctions Wj(r); namely,

G(r,t|r0,t0)=j=1Cj(t,t0)Wj(r)Wj(r0). (76)

Substitution of eq (76) into eq (69) yields the first order differential equation for the coefficients Cj(t, to)

kg1tCj(t,t0)+ξj2Cj(t,t0)=δ(tt0). (77)

The solution of eq (77) subject to the condition that Cj(t, to) = 0 to t <to is

Cj(t,t0)=η(tt0) exp {ξj2kg(tt0)}. (78)

The temperature in the gas (rsrri) for the cyclic heating and cooling described by eq (68) becomes according to eq (74)

Tg(r,t)=T0+j=1AjF0(ξj,ri,r)f(ω,ξj,kg,m,t) (79)

where we have added the ambient temperature To, where

f(ω,ξj,kg,m,t)=[{ exp (ξj2kgt)1}+m{1+(ω/ξj2kg)2}1{ exp (ξj2kgt) cos ωt(ω/ξj2kg) sin ωt}], (80)

where Aj is given by eq (34).

6.2. Plate

The temperature, T(zo, to) = u(zo, t)+v(zo)-To, satisfies the heat diffusion equation for the gas cell; namely, for times to≥0

2z02T(z0,t0)k1T(z0,t0)t=ρ(z0,t0), (81)

where ρ(zo, to) = η(|z|—z2)(z3—|z|) (Qi|Kg) (1 + m cos ωt) and where k is subscripted with s when z2 ⩽ |z| ⩽ z3 and with g when z2 ≥ |z| ≥ 0.

The Green’s function G (z, t| zo, to) for the gas cell satisfies the equation,

2G/z2k1G/t=δ(zz0)δ(tt1)K(k/k)1/2, (82)

where, when 0 ⩽ |z| ⩽ z2 k=kg, k’ = ks, and K=Kg; and where, when z2 ⩽|z| ⩽ k=ks, k’ = kg, and K = KS. This Green’s function for the gas cell obeys causality and conditions similar respectively to eq (70) and eq (71). It also satisfies the adjoint equation similar to eq (72).

Expressing the temperature in terms of the Green’s function involves the same steps as those contained in part A of this section. The thermal factors are Ks (kg/ks)1/2for the windows and Kg (ks/kg)1/2 for the gas. The final result is,

Tg(z,t)=T0+j=1Aj cos (ξjz)f(ω,ξj,kg,m,t), (83)

where Aj is given by eq (65), f(ω, ξj, kg, m, t) is given by eq (80), and where we have added the ambient temperature To.

7. Conclusions

The mathematical expressions contained in eqs (33), (34), (35) and (79) for cylinders and in eqs (64), (65), (67) and (83) for plates form the basis of the computer programs used in references [3] through [6]. The authors of these references predict by computer programs the performance of the proposed devices for measuring absorption coefficients as functions of their operating parameters.

8. Appendix A. Integrals Occurring in Equation (31) and Equation (32)

If Bn (ξr) is any one of the functions Jn(ξr),Yn(ξr), or Fn (ξ,ri,r), then from references [9], [10], and [11], we have that

B0(ξr)rdr=(r/ξ)J1(ξr)+ constant, (A1)
B0(r)r3dr=(r/ξ)[{r2(2/ξ)2}B1(ξr)+(2r/ξ)B0(ξr)]+constant, (A2)
 ln (r)B0(ξr)rdr=(r/ξ) ln (r)B1(ξr)+(1/ξ2)B0(ξr)+constant. (A3)

If Zm1r) = aJm(ξ1r)+bYm1r) and Xm2r)=cJm2r)+dYm2r) with a, b, c, and d independent of m and r, then

(ξ12ξ22)Zm(ξ1r)Xm(ξ2r)rdr=ξ2rZm(ξ1r)Xm1(ξ2r)ξ1rZm1(ξ1r)Xm(ξ2r). (A4)

9. Appendix B. Integrals Occurring in Equation (62) and Equation (63)

We tabulate in this Appendix the several integrals which appear in eq (62) and eq (63):

cos  {ξ(z+b)}dz=(1/ξ) sin  {ξ(z+b)} (B1)
z cos  {ξ(z+b)}dz=(1/ξ)2 cos  {ξ(z+b)}+ξz  sin  {ξ(z+b)} (B2)
z2 cos {ξ(z+b)}dz=(1/ξ)3[2ξz  cos {ξ(z+b)}+(ξ2z22)  sin  {ξ(z+b)}]. (B3)
 cos  {ξ1(z+b)}  cos  {ξ2(z+c)}=  cos  {ξ2(bc)}[ sin {(ξ1ξ2)(z+b)}2(ξ1ξ2)+ sin {(ξ1+ξ2)(z+b)}2(ξ1+ξ2)]+ sin {ξ2(bc)}[cos  (ξ1ξ2)(z+b)2(ξ1ξ2)cos  {(ξ1+ξ2)(z+b)}2(ξ1+ξ2)]; (B4)
 cos {ξ(z+b)} cos {ξ(z+c)}=cos {ξ(bc)}2ξ[ξ(z+b)+sin {ξ(z+b)}  cos  {ξ(z+b)}]+sin  {ξ(bc)}2ξsin2  {ξ(z+b)}. (B6)

Footnotes

1

Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

10. References

  • [1].White K. I., and Midwinter J. E., Opto-Electronics 5, 323(1973). [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Bennett H. S., and Forman R. A., to be published. [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Bennett H. S., and Forman R. A., to be published. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Bennett H. S., and Forman R. A., to be published. [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Bennett H. S., and Forman R. A., to be published. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Bennett H. S., and Forman R. A., to be published. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Bennett H. S., to be published. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by Abramowitzand M. Stegun I. A. (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1965), p. 355. [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Hildebrand F. B., Advanced Calculus for Engineers (Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, 1949), Chap. 4. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Morse R. M. and Feshbach H., Methods of Theoretical Physics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1953), p. 1322. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Mathews J. and Walker R. L., Mathematical Methods of Physics (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1965), p. 174. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES