Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2019 Jun 13;55(49):7009–7012. doi: 10.1039/c9cc01689a

Close the ring to break the cycle: Tandem quinolone-alkyne-cyclisation gives access to tricyclic pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones with potent anti-protozoal activity

Dávid Szamosvári a, Kayla Sylvester b, Philipp Schmid a, Kuan-Yi Lu b, Emily R Derbyshire b,c, Thomas Böttcher a
PMCID: PMC6565474  NIHMSID: NIHMS1031891  PMID: 31119221

Abstract

Expanding the chemical space of quinolones led to a tandem quinolone-alkyne-cyclisation reaction allowing chemoselective control of the synthesis of tricyclic pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones. Importantly, we discovered anti-protozoal activity against Plasmodium and Toxoplasma with specific potency of one of the compounds against the liver stage of the malaria parasite in the nanomolar range.

Abstract Graphics

graphic file with name nihms-1031891-f0001.jpg

We describe a tandem reaction leading to tricyclic pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones with unique selectivity against the liver stage of the malaria parasite.


Quinolines and quinolones are privileged structures that are common features in a large variety of medically valuable natural products and artificial drugs.13 Many of them exhibit antibiotic4, 5 and antiprotozoal activities.6, 7 While 3-carboxy-4(1H)-quinolones inhibit topoisomerases and thus replication, 2-alkyl-4(1H)-quinolones (AQs) and their N-oxides (AQNOs) are known to target proteins of the electron transport chain in Gram-positive bacteria, mycobacteria and protozoa.1 We have recently demonstrated that one of the various naturally produced AQNOs of the human pathogen P. aeruginosa – a trans-unsaturated 2-nonenyl-4-quinolone N-oxide (trans1-NQNO) – is particularly potent against S. aureus.8 While the saturated AQNO congeners were considerably less active or inactive against S. aureus,8 saturated AQNOs such as 2-dodecyl-4-quinolone N-oxide (DQNO) are potent anti-protozoal agents with activity against Plasmodium falciparum and Toxoplasma gondii parasites.912 These 4(1H)-quinolones and their N-oxides are dual inhibitors of the electron transport chain of protozoa via type II NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (PfNDH2 and TgNDH2) and the cytochrome bc1 complex.1113 In Mycobacterium tuberculosis structurally related 4(1H)-quinolones inhibited NADH:menaquinone oxidoreductase (Ndh).14 In addition, ortho- and peri-fused tricyclic quinolines and 4(1H)-quinolones have been described as anti-plasmodial agents. These include natural products like aurachine E15 or furoquinolines16 as well as the quinolone related, synthetic tricyclic acridinediones and acridones.17 Hereby the fusion side of the ring on the quinolone seems to be a critical factor for antiplasmodial activity. While ortho-ring fusion b sides are common and enable activity, c side fused-4(1H)-quinolones that lock the 4-position, such as aurachines A and H, were inactive against protozoa.15 Interestingly, a side fused 4(1H)-quinolones including position 1 nitrogen have so far not been investigated for their antiprotozoal potential. We thus envisioned a simple synthesis giving access to new tricyclic 4-quinolone compounds to study their activity against protozoal pathogens. Here, we report synthetic access to previously undescribed pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones by a tandem cyclization reaction involving a Camps reaction and the nucleophilic addition on an alkyne moiety. In addition, we show that these tricyclic quinolinones display antiprotozoal activity and are especially potent against the liver stage of Plasmodium. Our pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones represent the first examples of antiprotozoan compounds based on this tricyclic core which may be useful for future drug development efforts. In particular new scaffolds with antiplasmodial activity are desirable to address parasite resistance to existing quinolone-based drugs.

We started by comparing the activities of the native saturated and unsaturated AQs and AQNOs of P. aeruginosa against the blood and liver stage of the Plasmodium parasite that causes malaria, and against Toxoplasma gondii, the causative agent of toxoplasmosis. The synthesis of the saturated AQs (1–4) and AQNOs (5–8) was described previously.8 At concentrations of 5 μg/mL all tested AQs and AQNOs were highly potent against Plasmodium and Toxoplasma, demonstrating the general activity of the 4-quinolone scaffold is largely independent of its alkyl side chain length (Fig. 1). Most notably, infection of human red blood cells by Plasmodium falciparum was fully abrogated by all compounds at 5 μg/mL.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(A) Synthetic route for the generation of natural saturated and unsaturated AQs (1-4) and AQNOs (5-8). (B) Activity of compounds 1-8 against protozoa.

Parasite loads of Plasmodium berghei in liver HuH7 cells decreased by one to three orders of magnitude and T. gondii parasite load decreased by two orders of magnitude. No major differences were found in the activity between AQs and AQNOs, and saturated and unsaturated compounds, in all three protozoan infection models. This result was particularly interesting since AQs were virtually inactive against S. aureus, suggesting that a greater diversity of substitutions at the nitrogen could be tolerated for compounds against protozoa. We next aimed to expand the chemical space by the synthesis of novel tricyclic quinolone-derived scaffolds. Since alkynes are known to engage in diverse rearrangement and annulation reactions,18, 19 we explored if alkynylated 4(1H)-quinolones could give access to the corresponding tricycles. We first focused on the synthesis of Δ1-2-pentynyl-4(1H)-quinolone (9) with an alkyne group directly at the position 2. The only method for the synthesis of similar 2-alkynyl-4-quinolone was described by Wube et al.20 who reacted N-alkyl isatoic acid anhydride with 3-alkynyl-2-ones to obtain N-alkyl-2-alkynyl-4-quinolones after the procedure of Coppola.21 This method could not be applied for our non-N-alkylated target compound therefore we used previous Camps cyclization conditions for amide 9a to give the desired compound 9. Interestingly, we could also isolate the 2-quinolone 10 as the main product of the reaction which required a 1,2 shift of the triple bond. Activation by the electron withdrawing carbonyl of the amide group next to the triple bond likely facilitated deprotonation and thereby induction of an alkyne-zipper reaction that enabled the ring closure to the 3,4-disubstituted-2(1H)-quinolone product by Camps cyclization (Scheme S1A). Since the chemoselectivity of this alkyne-zipper-induced Camps cyclization was surprising, we screened different reaction conditions (Table S1). The 4-quinolone product was obtained only in low yields under all conditions and always as byproduct with its 2-quinolone isomer. The ring closure to the 2-quinolone was generally preferred in presence of weak (CsCO3) or bulky base (tert-BuOK). These conditions may have favored induction of the alkyne shift over α-deprotonation of the acetophenone. When using tert-butanol as solvent instead of 1,4-dioxane with either CsCO3 or tert-BuOK under reflux conditions (83°C), we could surprisingly observe the formation of a third product identified as 2-ethyl-4-methylfuro[2,3-b]quinoline 11.

The more polar solvent tert-butanol seemed to facilitate lactam-lactim tautomerization of the 2- quinolone amide group to its 2-hydroxyquinoline that reacts in an intramolecular nucleophilic addition with the sp1-carbon of the triple bond to perform a second, consecutive ring closure after the alkyne-zipper-induced Camps cyclization. The reaction mechanism via the 3-alkynyl-2(1H)-quinolone was confirmed by base treatment of the isolated 2-quinolone 10 bypassing the alkyne zipper to receive 11 in 64% yield which proofed to be the limiting factor for the synthesis of the furo[2,3-b]quinolones during the tandem reaction. When oct-3-ynamide 12a was used as substrate under the same conditions, yield of the furoquinoline 13 in the tandem reaction could be increased to 32% (Scheme 1). Cyclization reactions of similar 2-quinolones and 2-pyridones that depend on iodide or copper(I) iodide catalysts are known.22, 23 While our tandem mechanism allows a new rapid synthesis of furo[2,3-b]quinolones, this compound class itself is already known for its antiprotozoal activity.16, 24 We speculated that Δ2-2-alkynyl-4(1H)-quinolones could give access to new tricyclic cores when the α-position of the amide was blocked and hence obstructed 2-quinolone formation.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of furo[2,3-b]quinolones 11 and 13.

We synthesized 2,2-dimethyl-oct-3-ynamide 14d and subjected it to the same conditions that enabled the tandem reaction leading to furoquinolones. As expected, Camps cyclization to the 2(1H)-quinolone product was prevented and the 4(1H)-quinolone 14 was isolated as a minor reaction product. The major product was isolated and identified as 1-butyl-3,3-dimethylpyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5(3H)-one 15, a tricyclic compound with a previously undescribed scaffold which presumably was formed by addition of the quinolone-nitrogen on the alkyne. To investigate the synthesis of this pyrroloquinolin-5-one structure, we screened the reaction for chemoselectivity under identical reaction conditions as for the furoquinolones.

4(1H)-Quinolone (14) formation was generally facilitated by strong bases like NaOH and tert-BuOK independent of temperature and whether a protic (tert-butanol) or aprotic solvent (1,4-dioxane) was used. Only in combination with the more polar solvent tert-butanol, CsCO3 induced Camps cyclization in very low yields. In 1,4-dioxane at 75 °C with tert-BuOK as base, trace amounts of the endocyclic unsaturated pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-one (15) were observed, while under reflux traces of only an exocyclic unsaturated product, 3,3-dimethyl-2,3-dihydropyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-one (16) were obtained. With the protic solvent tert-butanol, cyclization of 14 to the endocyclic unsaturated tricycle 15 increased drastically with either NaOH (yield 35%) or tert-BuOK (yield 57%). In order to mechanistically dissect these reactions, we used an up-scaled preparation of 2-alkynyl-4(1H)-quinolone 14 which was subsequently investigated in cyclisation reactions to the pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones 15 and 16. In tert-butanol under reflux with tert-BuOK, 15 was obtained in 55% yield, confirming that the reaction proceeded via the 4(1H)-quinolone. However, under these conditions the constitutional isomer 16 was not detectable. This phenomenon suggests that 15 was the kinetic product whereas the thermodynamically more favorable product 16 with lower strain in the fused pyrrolidine ring would form at higher temperature (Table 1A). Motivated by the perspective of chemoselective synthesis of the unprecedented scaffold of 16, we tested solvents with higher boiling points. While Ph2O and DMSO gave no product or a complex mixture of products, DMF at 100°C selectively facilitated the cyclization of 14 to 16 in yields of 27% without formation of 15. Temperature increase or longer reaction times had no or rather adverse effects on the yield of 16 (Table 1B). Interestingly, from the same reaction we could also identify the dienylquinolones 17 and 18 (Scheme S1B), suggesting the formation of 16 via the allene as the initial step of an alkyne-zipper reaction similar to the reaction towards furoquinolines (Scheme S1C). Previously reported syntheses of pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoline-5-ones were dependent on pyrrolidine or pyrrolidine-2-one precursors and therefore contained only fully saturated pyrrolo-units.2528 We here provide the first example of chemoselectively synthesized unsaturated pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones 15 and 16 that extend

Table 1.

Optimization of reaction conditions.

graphic file with name nihms-1031891-t0002.jpg
base solvent temp. yield 14 (%)a yield 15 (%)a yield 16 (%)a
NaOH 1,4-dioxane 75 °C 76 - -
tert-BuOK 1,4-dioxane 75 °C 68 tracesb -
CsCO3 1,4-dioxane 75 °C - - -
NaOH 1,4-dioxane reflux 72 - -
tert-BuOK 1,4-dioxane reflux 60 - tracesb
CsCO3 1,4-dioxane reflux - - -
NaOH tert-BuOH reflux 64 35 -
tert-BuOK tert-BuOH reflux 26 57 -
CsCO3 tert-BuOH reflux 8 - -
graphic file with name nihms-1031891-t0003.jpg
base solvent temp. time (h) yield 15 (%)a yield 16 (%)a
tert-BuOK tert-BuOH reflux 4 75 -
tert-BuOK DMSO 100 °C 2 - -c
tert-BuOK DMF 100 °C 2 - 27d
tert-BuOK DMF 100 °C 4 - 15e
tert-BuOK DMF 125 °C o/n - -c
tert-BuOK Ph2O 100 °C 2 - -f
a

isolated yields.

b

identification based on NMR from impure chromatography fractions.

c

complex mixture of products.

d

48% of 14 was recovered.

e

35% of 14 was recovered.

f

93% of 14 was recovered.

the chemical space of this so far rather unexplored class of pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones. To determine if these new scaffolds have biological activities similar to quinolines and quinolones, their antiparasitic activity was profiled.

We hereby investigated the anti-protozoal activity of novel tricyclic compounds. All compounds exhibited only moderate activity against the blood stage of P. falciparum (Fig. 2A). While the furo[2,3-b]quinolone was generally the least active compound, the pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-ones 15 and 16 gave IC50 values of 3.2 μg/mL and 7.0 μg/mL against T. gondii. The compounds were particularly active against the liver stage of P. berghei. Here, 15 and 16 exhibited IC50 values of 0.038 μg/mL and 0.25 μg/mL corresponding to activity in the nanomolar range (142 nM and 935 nM, respectively). Importantly, 15 did not affect human liver cell (HuH7) viability up to 50 μg/mL, indicating a favorable selectivity index (Fig. 2B, Fig S3). While the scaffold structure of 15 and 16 differs only in the endo- and exocyclic double bond of the fused pyrrole-unit, it caused a pronounced difference in activity with 15 being over six-times more active than 16 against the liver stage of P. berghei. This strict dependence on the position of just one double bond indicates that even minor structural modification of the pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-one scaffold may be exploited to customize anti-protozoal activity. Compound 15 reduced P. berghei parasite size similar to the atovaquone positive control (Fig. 2C, 2D), further demonstrating the anti-Plasmodium activity of the compound. Yet unlike atovaquone and other cytochrome bc1 complex inhibitors,2931 15 exhibits greater inhibition of liver stage Plasmodium parasites when compared to the blood stage (Table S2, Fig. S4). This unique selectivity profile suggests that 15 reduces parasite load by a mechanism distinct from well-characterized electron transport chain disruption. While currently unknown, this additional mode(s) of action makes the scaffold desirable for further development to target drug resistant Plasmodium parasites.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(A) Activity of tricyclic compounds 11, 15 and 16 against protozoa. Potency reported as IC50s in μg/mL. P. berghei and T. gondii loads were evaluated in human liver HuH7 cells while P. falciparum load was evaluated in human red blood cells. (B) Dose-dependent activity of 15 against various parasites. (C) Visualization of P. berghei growth in liver HuH7 cells in the presence of 15 (0.37 μM) and atovaquone (1 nM). Representative images were shown. Scale bar is 10 μm. (D) Quantification of parasite size in the presence of 15 and atovaquone (ATV). p-value <0.0001 (****).

Access to new structural diversity is one of the most promising strategies against the uprising of drug resistance in protozoan pathogens like Plasmodium or Toxoplasma. Besides modification of already existing scaffolds, the innovation of skeletal diversity is arguably the most important principle for generating biological activity.32, 33 Naturally produced 2-alkyl-4-quinolone and their N-oxides comprise general activity against protozoa with position 1 and 2 as convenient and flexible modification sites. Using a catalyst-free, tandem cyclization reaction we optimized the chemoselective synthetic accessibility of novel tricyclic pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-5-one scaffolds that exhibit promising new skeletal features for drug development.

Supplementary Material

sup

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Andreas Marx and his group for their generous support. This work was funded by the Emmy Noether program (DFG), EU FP7 Marie Curie ZIF, Fonds der Chemischen Industrie, the NIH DP2AI138239 (ERD) and a KoRS-CB PhD fellowship (DS). We thank Laetitia Arnold for support in organic synthesis and Prof. Dr. Tanja Gaich for helpful discussions.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Footnotes relating to the title and/or authors should appear here.

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [details of any supplementary information available should be included here]. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x

Notes and references

  • 1.Heeb S, Fletcher MP, Chhabra SR, Diggle SP, Williams P and Camara M, FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2011, 35, 247–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fernandez-Alvaro E, Hong WD, Nixon GL, O’Neill PM and Calderon F, J Med Chem, 2016, 59, 5587–5603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chu XM, Wang C, Liu W, Liang LL, Gong KK, Zhao CY and Sun KL, Eur J Med Chem, 2019, 161, 101–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Szamosvári D and Böttcher T, Synlett, 2018, 29, 542–547. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Appelbaum PC and Hunter PA, Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2000, 16, 5–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaur K, Jain M, Reddy RP and Jain R, Eur J Med Chem, 2010, 45, 3245–3264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fan YL, Cheng XW, Wu JB, Liu M, Zhang FZ, Xu Z and Feng LS, Eur J Med Chem, 2018, 146, 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Szamosvári D and Böttcher T, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2017, 56, 7271–7275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saleh A, Friesen J, Baumeister S, Gross U and Bohne W, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2007, 51, 1217–1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tietze LF and Ma L, Heterocycles, 2010, 82, 377–396 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin SS, Kerscher S, Saleh A, Brandt U, Gross U and Bohne W, Biochim Biophys Acta, 2008, 1777, 1455–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Biagini GA, Fisher N, Shone AE, Mubaraki MA, Srivastava A, Hill A, Antoine T, Warman AJ, Davies J, Pidathala C, Amewu RK, Leung SC, Sharma R, Gibbons P, Hong DW, Pacorel B, Lawrenson AS, Charoensutthivarakul S, Taylor L, Berger O, Mbekeani A, Stocks PA, Nixon GL, Chadwick J, Hemingway J, Delves MJ, Sinden RE, Zeeman AM, Kocken CH, Berry NG, O’Neill PM and Ward SA, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012, 109, 8298–8303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nixon GL, Pidathala C, Shone AE, Antoine T, Fisher N, O’Neill PM, Ward SA and Biagini GA, Future Med Chem, 2013, 5, 1573–1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hong WD, Gibbons PD, Leung SC, Amewu R, Stocks PA, Stachulski A, Horta P, Cristiano MLS, Shone AE, Moss D, Ardrey A, Sharma R, Warman AJ, Bedingfield PTP, Fisher NE, Aljayyoussi G, Mead S, Caws M, Berry NG, Ward SA, Biagini GA, O’Neill PM and Nixon GL, J Med Chem, 2017, 60, 3703–3726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Höfle G, Boohlendorf B, Fecker T, Sasse F and Kunze B, J Nat Prod, 2008, 71, 1967–1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Basco LK, Mitaku S, Skaltsounis AL, Ravelomanantsoa N, Tillequin F, Koch M and Le Bras J, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1994, 38, 1169–1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Biagini GA, Fisher N, Berry N, Stocks PA, Meunier B, Williams DP, Bonar-Law R, Bray PG, Owen A, O’Neill PM and Ward SA, Mol Pharmacol, 2008, 73, 1347–1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harvey DF and Sigano DM, Chemical Reviews, 1996, 96, 271–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mehta S, Waldo JP and Larock RC, J Org Chem, 2009, 74, 1141–1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wube A, Guzman JD, Hufner A, Hochfellner C, Blunder M, Bauer R, Gibbons S, Bhakta S and Bucar F, Molecules, 2012, 17, 8217–8240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coppola GM, J Heterocyclic Chem, 1985, 22, 491–494. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pedron J, Boudot C, Bourgeade-Delmas S, Sournia-Saquet A, Paloque L, Rastegari M, Abdoulaye M, El-Kashef H, Bonduelle C, Pratviel G, Wyllie S, Fairlamb AH, Courtioux B, Verhaeghe P and Valentin A, ChemMedChem, 2018, 13, 2217–2228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aillaud I, Bossharth E, Conreaux D, Desbordes P, Monteiro N and Balme G, Org Lett, 2006, 8, 1113–1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wansi JD, Hussain H, Tcho AT, Kouam SF, Specht S, Sarite SR, Hoerauf A and Krohn K, Phytother Res, 2010, 24, 775–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Michael JP, deKoning CB and Stanbury TV, Tetrahedron Letters, 1996, 37, 9403–9406. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huang PQ and Fan T, European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201701060, 6369–6374. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Audisio D, Messaoudi S, Peyrat JF, Brion JD and Alami M, J Org Chem, 2011, 76, 4995–5005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang J, Chen Y, King AO, Dilmeghani M, Larsen RD and Faul MM, Org Lett, 2008, 10, 2609–2612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Derbyshire ER, Prudencio M, Mota MM and Clardy J, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012, 109, 8511–8516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Raphemot R, Lafuente-Monasterio MJ, Gamo-Benito FJ, Clardy J and Derbyshire ER, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2015, 60, 1430–1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nam TG, McNamara CW, Bopp S, Dharia NV, Meister S, Bonamy GM, Plouffe DM, Kato N, McCormack S, Bursulaya B, Ke H, Vaidya AB, Schultz PG and Winzeler EA, ACS Chem Biol, 2011, 6, 1214–1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Galloway WR, Isidro-Llobet A and Spring DR, Nat Commun, 2010, 1, 80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gamo FJ, Sanz LM, Vidal J, de Cozar C, Alvarez E, Lavandera JL, Vanderwall DE, Green DV, Kumar V, Hasan S, Brown JR, Peishoff CE, Cardon LR and Garcia-Bustos JF, Nature, 2010, 465, 305–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sup

RESOURCES