Abstract
The brain is a genomic mosaic shaped by cellular responses to genome damage. Here, we manipulate somatic genome stability by conditional Knl1 deletion from embryonic mouse brain. KNL1 mutations cause microcephaly and KNL1 mediates the spindle assembly checkpoint, a safeguard against chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy. We find that following Knl1 deletion, segregation errors in mitotic neural progenitor cells give rise to DNA damage on the missegregated chromosomes. This triggers rapid p53 activation and robust apoptotic and microglial phagocytic responses that extensively eliminate cells with somatic genome damage, thus causing microcephaly. By leaving only karyotypically normal progenitors to continue dividing, these mechanisms provide a second safeguard against brain somatic aneuploidy. Without Knl1 or p53-dependent safeguards, genome-damaged cells are not cleared, alleviating microcephaly, but paradoxically leading to total pre-weaning lethality. Thus, mitotic genome damage activates robust responses to eliminate somatic mutant cells, which if left unpurged, can impact brain and organismal fitness.
Subject terms: Neural progenitors, Neural stem cells
The brain is a genomic mosaic shaped by somatic mutations and cellular responses that correct or purge these mutations. Here, by manipulating genome stability during embryonic brain development, authors revealed robust mechanisms that eliminate cells with genome damage from the brain, and the consequences of leaving somatic mutants unpurged
Introduction
Maintenance of genome stability across divisions is essential to proliferating cells. In embryonic cerebral cortex, neurons and glia are generated by neural progenitor cells (NPCs) via successive rounds of cell divisions1,2. Somatic mutations inevitably arise during DNA synthesis and chromosome segregation, and their impact is alleviated by DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and elimination of cells with genome damage3,4. Left uncorrected or unpurged, these mutations lead to somatic mosaicism5,6. The adult human brain harbors multiple types of somatic mosaic mutations, including aneuploidy7–10. Emerging evidence suggests that somatic mutations can contribute to brain disorders11,12. However, the mechanisms that curtail the propagation of brain somatic mutations, and the consequence of their impairment, remain incompletely understood.
Here, we generated a conditional allele of Knl1 to manipulate genome stability in embryonic mouse brain, and leveraged this model to study the consequences of somatic genome instability in vivo. KNL1 (formerly CASC5 or BLINKIN) is a kinetochore component required for the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which safeguards correct chromosomal segregation during mitosis13,14. In the presence of chromosomes unattached to microtubules, KNL1 functions as a scaffold for the assembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex, a potent inhibitor of anaphase. Upon secure attachment of all chromosomes, SAC is deactivated, and anaphase proceeds. In the absence of the KNL1-BUB3-BUB1 pathway, the ROD-ZWILCH-ZW10 pathway can activate SAC in response to unattached kinetochores, but SAC is deactivated prematurely, resulting in segregation errors15. Disruption of KNL1-BUB3-BUB1 components thus leads to numerical (whole chromosome) aneuploidy7,14,16,17.
Human mutations in KNL1 are associated with autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (OMIM 604321)18–21. Previous studies of microcephaly have converged on mechanisms involving centrosome dysfunction22. KNL1 is part of the emerging genetic data implicating altered SAC function in microcephaly19,23. However, the predicted outcome of SAC disruption, aneuploidy, is not particularly lethal to neural cells and has been reported to be prevalent in normal brain24,25. Aneuploidy, therefore, may not be the singular underlying cause of severe microcephaly in patients with KNL1 mutations.
We find in mice that conditional deletion of Knl1 from mitotic cortical NPCs leads to frequent chromosome segregation errors. The resulting missegregated chromosomes carry DNA damage in the form of double strand breaks (DSBs). Likely independently of aneuploidy, this DNA damage triggers rapid p53-dependent apoptotic and downstream microglial phagocytic responses that extensively eliminate the cells with chromosome missegregation. By leaving only karyotypically normal NPCs to continue dividing, these p53-dependent mechanisms provide a second safeguard against brain somatic aneuploidy in addition to the SAC. Applied en masse following Knl1 deletion, however, they cause massive cell loss and severe microcephaly. In the absence of both Knl1 and p53 safeguards against aneuploidy, genome-damaged cells are not eliminated from the brain. Paradoxically, this accumulation of somatic mutant cells, despite partially alleviating microcephaly, results in complete pre-weaning lethality. Our work thus unravels robust cellular processes in embryonic brain for eliminating cells with severe genome damage, which if left unpurged, can affect brain function and organismal fitness.
Results
Knl1 deletion led to cortical NPC loss and microcephaly
Consistent with KNL1 function in the SAC13,14, publicly available single-cell RNA-seq26,27, and in situ hybridization28 data from embryonic cortex showed Knl1 expression in proliferating NPCs in the germinal zones, the ventricular zone (VZ) and subventricular zone (SVZ), but not in post-mitotic neurons, and bulk RNA-seq29,30 showed forebrain Knl1 expression throughout neurogenesis (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Constitutive deletion of Knl1 in mice led to lethality on embryonic day (E)6 (MGI Ref. ID: J:175597). We recovered a conditional-ready lacZ reporter Knl1 allele (Knl1tm1a(EUCOMM)Hmgu; Supplementary Fig. 1b) from frozen spermatozoa. LacZ reporter expression was confirmed in E15.5 cortex (Supplementary Fig. 1c), and Knl1 conditional allele (Knl1fl/fl) was generated by crossing with Flpo recombinase mice to remove the lacZ cassette.
To conditionally delete Knl1, we used hGFAP-Cre, a transgenic line that mediates Cre recombination in cortical NPCs starting at E12.531. Knl1fl/fl;hGFAP-Cre (cKO) mice were viable at birth. On postnatal day (P)4 (Fig. 1a, b), compared to control (ctrl), cKO mice exhibited a 40% decrease in cortical area (ctrl, 21 ± 1.0 mm2; cKO, 13 ± 0.8mm2, mean ± s.e.m, p = 1.3E−3, two-tailed unpaired t-test) and a 32% decrease in cortical plate (CP) thickness (ctrl, 947 ± 9.1 µm; cKO, 643 ± 12.1 µm, p = 2.05E−5), consistent with microcephaly in patients with KNL1 mutations. Knl1 cKO mice were smaller in size and exhibited subviability, with ~75% survival at weaning (P21) and ~50% survival at P150 (n = 11 animals; Fig. 1c).
To investigate neuronal subtypes in cKO brain, we analyzed cortical layer markers1. At P4, TBR1-expressing layer (L)6 and BCL11B(CTIP2)-expressing L5 neurons were not significantly altered in number or laminar location (Fig. 1d). However, POU3F2-expressing L2–5 neurons were reduced by 55% (ctrl, 334 ± 31.2; cKO, 151 ± 12.8 per 200 µm column, p = 0.017, two-tailed unpaired t-test) and CUX1-expressing L2–4 neurons were reduced by 85% (ctrl, 206 ± 11.5; cKO, 30 ± 3.2 per 200 µm column, p = 8.8E−6). Agenesis of the corpus callosum was observed in cKO (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Thus, layer cell fates were specified following Knl1 deletion, but upper layer (L2–4) neurons were selectively reduced, whereas deep layer (L5–6) neurons were not significantly affected.
In cortical neurogenesis, NPCs give rise first to deep layer neurons, then upper layer neurons1. The loss of late-born upper layer neurons is consistent with a progressive decrease in NPCs. We therefore analyzed NPCs at E13.5, E15.5, and E16.5. SOX2-expressing apical progenitors (APs) and EOMES(TBR2)-expressing intermediate progenitors (IPs) showed stage-dependent reductions in number, each exhibiting a significant loss by E15.5 (Fig. 1e) and a >50% reduction by E16.5 (EOMES: ctrl, 65 ± 0.9; cKO, 32 ± 3.3 per 200 µm column, p = 7.4E−3, SOX2, ctrl, 138 ± 16.6; cKO, 51 ± 2.1, p = 0.031, two-tailed unpaired t-test). Thus, deletion of Knl1 led to progressive loss of NPCs. In E16.5 cKO cortex, some SOX2+ NPCs were positioned outside VZ and SVZ, suggesting a disorganization of embryonic cortical layering.
In addition to hGFAP-Cre, we conditionally deleted Knl1 using Emx1-Cre32, which mediates Cre recombination in cortical NPCs starting at E10.5. Earlier Knl1 deletion by Emx1-Cre led to microcephaly more severe than hGFAP-Cre (Supplementary Fig. 1e) and a loss of both deep and upper layer neurons (Supplementary Fig. 1f). This increased phenotypic severity is consistent with a progressive loss of NPCs following Knl1 deletion and a requirement for Knl1 by NPCs during both early and late neurogenesis. Together, these results suggested that Knl1 deletion impaired NPC proliferation, survival, or maintenance.
Knl1 deletion led to rapid and robust apoptosis
To determine whether apoptosis contributed to NPC loss, we analyzed cleaved caspase 3 (CC3). Widespread CC3 labeling was observed in E15.5 cKO cortex, whereas only rare instances were found in littermate controls (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2a). Consistently, DAPI DNA staining revealed an abundance of pyknotic nuclei, a condensation of chromatin and hallmark of apoptosis rarely found in controls (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 2b). In cKO, pyknotic nuclei showed a stereotyped clustering (arrowheads; Fig. 2b).
We next analyzed the progression of apoptosis in cKO. At E13.5, within one day of hGFAP-Cre onset31, CC3 was already increased in cortical wall, which at this age was mostly composed of NPCs, suggesting that apoptosis rapidly followed Knl1 deletion from NPCs (Fig. 2c). At E15.5, near the peak of neurogenesis, CC3 was abundantly present in the germinal zones and intermediate zone (IZ), but was largely absent from CP, where RBFOX3(NeuN)-positive neurons had settled after migration (Fig. 2d). By E17.5, near the end of neurogenesis, CC3 staining was only marginally increased (Fig. 2e).
To assess the timing of apoptosis, we tracked NPC using a dual pulse of thymidine analogs 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) and 5-chloro-2′-deoxyuridine (CldU) (Fig. 2f, g), which are incorporated into DNA in S-phase. CldU was given at E16.5, 4 h prior to analysis to label cells that recently entered S-phase. In cKO, CldU-labeled NPCs entered S-phase in VZ and SVZ, similar to littermate controls (open arrowheads, Fig. 2f). CldU+ nuclei in cKO were morphologically healthy and did not show significantly increased colocalization with CC3 compared to ctrl (Fig. 2h). Thus, following Knl1 deletion, NPCs were able to enter S-phase and did not immediately undergo apoptosis. EdU was given at E15.5, to track cells that entered S-phase 24 h prior to analysis. In contrast to CldU, a majority of EdU+ cells had become apoptotic within 24 h of S-phase in cKO (solid arrowheads, Fig. 2g), with 58 ± 3.2% of EdU+ cells showing colocalization with CC3 compared to 4 ± 1.1% in control (Fig. 2h). To assess cell cycle progression, we used phospho-histone H3 (pHH3) staining to label M-phase cells and a 4-h pulse of CldU to label S-phase cells. This showed that per S-phase cell, the number of cells in M-phase was significantly increased by 2.7-fold in cKO (M-phase/S-phase ratio: ctrl, 7 ± 0.6%; cKO, 19 ± 0.3%, p = 0.036, two-tailed unpaired t-test, Supplementary Fig. 2c). The increase in pHH3+ cells was present by E13.5 (Supplementary Fig. 2d). This suggested that in cKO, a significantly increased proportion of cells was unable to progress normally through M-phase, which is in agreement with a recent in vitro study of a patient KNL1 mutation33. Consistent with incompletion or delayed completion of mitosis, cKO cells largely failed to become post-mitotic neurons 24 h after S-phase. In control, many cells labeled with a 24 pulse of EdU were present in the IZ (yellow arrows, Fig. 2g), a region containing newly post-mitotic neurons migrating to the CP. In cKO, however, EdU-labeled cells largely failed to enter the IZ (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. 2e). Together, these data revealed that cKO NPCs largely failed to complete mitosis or become migrating neurons within 24 h of S-phase, and a majority underwent apoptosis.
Knl1 deletion led to DNA damage and p53 activation in NPCs
Apoptosis is controlled by multiple regulatory mechanisms, including transcriptional regulation34. To gain insights into potential transcriptional mechanisms underpinning apoptosis in Knl1 cKO, we performed transcriptome analysis. We reasoned that although apoptosis activates mRNA decay35, the initial transcriptional events that trigger apoptosis, and potential population changes in the transcriptome, can be detectable. We generated unique molecular identifier (UMI) RNA-seq libraries by Click-seq36 of cKO and littermate control cortices at E15.5, the peak of apoptosis in cKO. In Click-seq, UMI tagging of individual cDNA molecules enabled de-duplication of PCR-amplified reads. Analysis of ERCC spike-in RNA standards revealed excellent quantification within a dynamic range that covered essentially all analyzed genes (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Analysis of differential gene expression using edgeR37 revealed a total of 47 differentially expressed genes (68 transcripts including gene models) in cKO with a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.05, (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Table 1). Strikingly, of the 19 upregulated genes, 8 are known to be transcriptionally activated by the tumor suppressor p53, bound at their genomic locus by p53, or both. Among the top three upregulated genes, Ano3 is a target of p53 after X-irradiation38, Eda2r is activated in p53-dependent cell death39, and Pvt1 is induced by p5340. Droplet digital RT-PCR (ddRT-PCR) validated upregulation of these genes (Fig. 3c), and showed an increase in Bbc3 (Puma), a well-known p53-dependent mediator of apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Additional genes at FDR < 0.1 included Cdkn1a (also known as p21) and Ccng1, which mediate p53-dependent cell cycle arrest. Our analysis also revealed changes in cell type composition. Among downregulated genes were those expressed by cells derived from the hGFAP-Cre lineage (e.g. Eomes, Emx1, Supplementary Table 1), which is consistent with apoptosis of cortical NPCs. Reduction in Eomes was confirmed by ddRT-PCR (Fig. 3c) and consistent with loss of IPs (Fig. 1e). Among upregulated genes were those specific to cells derived from interneuronal lineages unaffected by hGFAP-Cre (e.g. Gad1, Erbb4, Fig. 3b), a reflection of their relative increase following loss of hGFAP-Cre-derived NPCs. Together, these data reflected cell type-dependent apoptosis in Knl1 cKO and supported p53-activated transcription as a pathway towards apoptosis.
In the absence of DNA damage, p53 is targeted by ubiquitin ligase MDM2 for degradation41. Following DNA damage, MDM2 is phosphorylated by ATM, which abrogates MDM2 degradation of p5341. We immunostained for stabilized p53, and found a 12-fold increase in the number of p53+ cells in cKO (Fig. 3d, ctrl, 4 ± 1.5; cKO, 51 ± 7.8 per 200 µm column, p = 0.0224, two-tailed unpaired t-test). p53 was localized to nuclei and present in pyknotic cells (Fig. 3d). To assess DNA damage, we immunostained for the histone variant γH2AX. The number of γH2AX+ cells was increased by 4.5-fold in cKO (Fig. 3d, ctrl, 10 ± 2.8; cKO, 45 ± 0.9 per 200 µm column, p = 0.0037). Furthermore, cKO brain was characterized by an increase in VZ cells labeled by phospho-(p)KAP1 (TRIM28) (Supplementary Fig. 3c), an ATM substrate and marker of heterochromatic DSBs. Notably, p53+, γH2AX+, or pKAP1+ cells were preferentially located in VZ and SVZ, and largely absent from CP, suggesting that DNA damage and p53 response occurred in NPCs. To directly identify cells with activated p53, we co-stained p53 with SOX2 (APs), EOMES (IPs), or RBFOX3 (neurons) in E15.5 cKO (Supplementary Fig. 3d). The vast majority of p53+ cells were SOX2+ (89 ± 1.5%, Fig. 3e), suggesting that DNA damage and p53 activation occurred in NPCs following Knl1 deletion. Supporting this, γH2AX and p53 were widespread in cKO VZ by E13.5 (Supplementary Fig. 3e), when the majority of cortical cells were NPCs and preceding massive apoptosis at E15.5. Together, these analyses suggested that DNA damage, acquired in mitotic NPCs, elicited p53-dependent response following Knl1 deletion.
Missegregated chromosomes with DNA damage in Knl1 cKO NPCs
Disruption of SAC components causes chromosome missegregation and numerical aneuploidy14,16,17. Aneuploidy, however, can be tolerated by neural cells24,25 and does not inevitably lead to p53 activation42. Interestingly, errors in segregation can give rise to lagging chromosomes at the cleavage furrow that are prone to DNA damage42–44. We reasoned that missegregation-related chromosome damage may be present in Knl1 cKO. We therefore surveyed mitotic figures at the ventricular surface, where apical NPCs undergo mitosis (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4a). In control E15.5 VZ, we found an abundance of anaphase cells, only a minority of which exhibited potential chromosome missegregation. In striking contrast, in cKO, 83.6% of anaphase cells were characterized by lagging or bridged chromosomes (open arrowheads, Fig. 4a, b, ctrl, 8.3 ± 2.87%; cKO, 83.6 ± 3.21%) within the phospho-Vimentin(pVim)-labeled spindle midzone (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4b). In addition, micronuclei, which are chromosomes not incorporated into either daughter nuclei and a hallmark of chromosomal instability45, were present in mitotic NPCs (solid arrowheads, Fig. 4a). Notably, γH2AX+ foci were consistently found within or near lagging chromosomes and in micronuclei (arrows, Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 4c), and the proportion of metaphases with γH2AX foci was significantly increased in cKO (ctrl, 14 ± 1.2%; cKO, 74 ± 4.4%, Supplementary Fig. 4d). To better visualize chromosomal defects, we used NPC cultures from E15.5 cortices. One day after dissociation, we applied EdU for 12 h to label mitotic NPCs prior to fixation. Using EdU to visualize DNA, we observed an abundance of DNA bridges with γH2AX (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 4e), which were often localized near the cleavage furrow, suggesting that DNA damage may be associated with cytokinesis44.
To directly assay for DNA breaks, we performed single cell electrophoresis comet assay on E14.5 cortices. This showed in cKO a significant increase in comet tailing (ctrl, 8.9 ± 1.96%; cKO, 34.1 ± 3.74%, p = 0.0175, two-tailed unpaired t-test, Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 4f) and tail length among cells with tails (ctrl: 14.5 ± 2.67 µm, cKO: 68.6 ± 3.31 µm, p = 3.67E−17, Fig. 4f), indicating a considerable increase in DSBs. Together, chromosome missegregation, increased DNA breaks, and activation of p53 in NPCs strongly supported mitotic DSBs as an important trigger for p53-dependent response in Knl1 cKO.
Trp53/Knl1 co-deletion partially rescued Knl1 cKO phenotypes
To understand the necessity of p53 in the cKO apoptotic response and the consequences of disrupting both SAC and p53-dependent mechanisms, we generated Knl1/Trp53 conditional double mutants (Knl1fl/fl;Trp53fl/fl;hGFAP-Cre, dKO). Analysis of Knl1/Trp53 dKO brain revealed partial amelioration of phenotypes found in Knl1 single cKO. At P0 and P4, cortex size was partially restored (P0: ctrl, 11 ± 0.3; cKO, 7 ± 0.2; dKO, 9 ± 0.8 mm2, ctrl:cKO, p = 2.5E−4; ctrl:dKO, p = 0.056; cKO:dKO, p = 0.042, ANOVA with post-hoc t-test, Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 5a). Loss of CUX1+ neurons also was partially ameliorated (ctrl, 202 ± 18.2; cKO 82 ± 6.2; dKO 146 ± 16.9 per 200 µm column, ctrl:cKO, p = 1.0E−3; ctrl:dKO, p = 0.040; cKO:dKO, p = 0.032, Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 5b). NPCs number was not significantly decreased in dKO compared to control, which is consistent with partial alleviation of microcephaly (Supplementary Fig. 5c).
To analyze whether the p53-dependent transcriptome signature we found in cKO remained, we performed UMI RNA-seq of E15.5 dKO cortex (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Table 2). This revealed a striking reversal of essentially all gene expression changes observed in Knl1 cKO (Supplementary Table 3). Among the 68 differentially regulated transcripts we found in cKO compared to control (FDR < 0.05), only one transcript (gene model Gm29260) remained significant in dKO compared to control. Importantly, the eight significantly upregulated p53 targets from cKO were each at an FDR of 1.000 (i.e. not differentially expressed) in dKO (Supplementary Fig. 5d). These results were validated using ddRT-PCR (Supplementary Fig. 5e). Overall, both upregulated and downregulated genes at FDR < 0.05 from cKO versus control became normalized following co-deletion of Trp53, shifting in log-fold change towards 0 (i.e. not differentially expressed) (Supplementary Fig. 5f). Therefore, the transcriptome changes in cKO were largely p53-dependent.
p53 regulates diverse target genes in a context-dependent manner46,47. Intersectional analyses (Fig. 5d) showed that, taken as a single group, neither genes bound by p53 nor p53 transcriptional targets48 were differentially regulated in cKO compared to dKO. However, intersectional analysis with genes activated by X-radiation-induced DSBs38 were significantly overrepresented in our top p53-dependent genes in cKO (Phyper = 6.3E−14, hypergeometric test) and showed a significant difference between cKO and dKO (p = 5.1E−7, two-tailed paired t-test). Thus, not all p53-dependent genes were upregulated following Knl1 deletion, and the transcriptomic signature of p53 activation in cKO is consistent with DSBs as a trigger.
Attenuated apoptosis following Knl1/Trp53 co-deletion
Although co-deletion of Trp53 abolished the p53-dependent transcriptional response, chromosome missegregation from SAC disruption should persist in dKO. Indeed, we found significant increases in chromosome missegregation and DNA breaks in dKO (Fig. 6a–c and Supplementary Fig. 6a). Next, we investigated whether apoptosis could be elicited in the absence of p53 (Supplementary Fig. 6c). We found an increase in CC3 immunostaining in E15.5 dKO compared to control (Fig. 6d), but that increase was modest compared to the p53-intact cKO. Pyknosis was also present (Fig. 6e, f, ctrl, 4 ± 0.6; cKO, 327 ± 6.9; dKO, 18 ± 2.7 per 200 µm column). But compared to cKO, pyknosis was not increased to the same extent (dKO 18-fold lower than cKO, p = 1.2E−13, ANOVA with post-hoc t-test), suggesting that although apoptosis was present, it was less efficient compared to p53-dependent mechanisms. This was supported by reduced clearance of γH2AX+ cells (Fig. 6g). Compared to cKO, γH2AX+ cells were 1.7-fold more numerous in dKO (cKO, 42 ± 2.6, dKO, 71 ± 4.3 per 200 µm column, p = 3.7E−4). Cells labeled by heterochromatic DSB marker pKAP1 were also less efficiently cleared (Supplementary Fig. 6d). Together, these results showed that cells with genome damage as a result of Knl1 deletion underwent p53-dependent apoptosis in cKO. In the absence of p53 in dKO, apoptosis occurred at significantly lower levels and was less efficient at clearing cells with genome damage.
Robust phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by microglia in Knl1 cKO
In Knl1 cKO, we found an abundance of pyknotic nuclei compared to controls in the embryonic brain that were cleared by early postnatal ages (Fig. 7a), implicating a robust mechanism for their elimination. In vivo, post-apoptotic cells are eliminated via phagocytosis, by macrophages in peripheral tissues. Our RNA-seq of cKO showed significant increases in Lcp2 and Wdfy4, two genes selectively expressed in microglia (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Table 1)26,49. Microglia are resident phagocytes present in embryonic brain as early as E10.550,51. To analyze microglia, we immunostained for ADGRE1 (F4/80), a marker of macrophagic cells. At E15.5, we found a striking change in microglial morphology (Fig. 7b). Confocal z-stack analysis revealed that microglia acquired a ballooned morphology. Each ballooned microglia contained dozens of phagocytosed pyknotic nuclei (Fig. 7c), which explained their stereotyped clustering (Fig. 2b). Some of the pyknotic nuclei were CC3+, confirming that they were apoptotic cells (Fig. 7c). In cKO, microglial size was increased by 2.5-fold (Fig. 7d, ctrl, 189.8 ± 21.29; cKO, 481.1 ± 35.17 µm2, p = 6.3E−4, ANOVA with post-hoc t-test) and analysis using microglia marker AIF1 (IBA1) showed similar changes (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Microglial number was also increased, by approximately five-fold (Fig. 7e, ctrl, 10 ± 1.8; cKO, 51 ± 8.9 per 400 µm column, p = 3.3E−4). Microglia have self-renewal capacity50,51. At this embryonic age, microglia were proliferative and marked by KI67 in ctrl and cKO (Supplementary Fig. 7b), suggesting that their abundance could result from proliferation. By P0, concomitant with clearance of pyknotic nuclei (Fig. 7a), ADGRE1+ microglia in cKO became comparable to control in size and morphology, and were mononuclear (arrowheads, Supplementary Fig. 7c). Together, these results are consistent with robust microglial activation following massive apoptosis, leading to rapid elimination of post-apoptotic cells from the prenatal Knl1 cKO brain.
To determine whether the microglial response was associated with p53, we examined E15.5 dKO. We found significant increases in both number and size of microglia compared to control (Fig. 7c–e). These increases, however, were attenuated compared to those in cKO (Fig. 7d, e; size: cKO, 481.1 ± 35.17 µm2; dKO, 325.4 ± 19.19 µm2, p = 9.2E−3; number: cKO, 51 ± 8.9; dKO, 27 ± 2.3 per 400 µm column, p = 0.060, ANOVA with post-hoc t test), and consistent with significantly lower levels of apoptosis in dKO (Fig. 6d–f). Thus, our analyses of Knl1/Trp53 dKO showed that chromosomal damage can lead to apoptotic and microglial phagocytic responses via a p53-independent mechanism. However, in the absence of p53, these responses were attenuated and significantly less efficient at clearing genome-damaged cells, thus partially alleviating microcephaly associated with Knl1 deletion.
Unpurged somatic mutants and total pre-weaning lethality in dKO
To assess the efficiency with which p53-dependent mechanisms cleared genome-damaged cells following Knl1 deletion, we karyotyped NPCs from E14.5 cortex. Remarkably, mitotic NPCs in cKO had normal karyotypes comparable to control (chromosome number, p = 0.71, Fisher’s exact test, Fig. 8a, b), suggesting that cells with DNA damage from a previous round of mitosis were largely cleared by p53-dependent responses prior to the next cell cycle. The remaining mitotic cells, therefore, were karyotypically normal. Qualitatively, we observed that the number of metaphase spreads were lower in cKO compared to control, which was consistent with loss of NPCs in cKO. To determine the genomic consequences of Knl1 deletion in the absence of p53, we karyotyped NPCs from dKO. Strikingly, aneuploidy was found in the majority of dKO NPCs (79%, Fig. 8a, b), suggesting that in the absence of p53, NPCs with missegregation were not efficiently cleared and continued dividing. Consistent with this, microcephaly as a result of Knl1 deletion was partially alleviated in dKO (Fig. 5a). Paradoxically, despite partial restoration of brain size, survival analysis of dKO revealed complete pre-weaning lethality, compared to about 25% cKO lethality at the time of weaning (dKO survival 0/14; cKO survival 8/11, Fig. 8c).
Together, these results showed that, following Knl1 deletion and SAC disruption, DNA damage on missegregated chromosomes triggered rapid p53-dependent apoptotic and downstream microglia phagocytic responses that efficiently eliminated cells with chromosome missegregation from embryonic brain, thus causing severe microcephaly (Fig. 8d). However, because genome-damaged cells were cleared, the remaining cells were largely euploid, and cKO organismal survival at weaning was at ~75%. Following co-deletion of Trp53 with Knl1, genome-damaged cells were not efficiently cleared and somatic mutant cells remained in the brain. Despite partial alleviation of microcephaly, the dKO showed total pre-weaning lethality. This paradox suggested that severely genome-damaged cells, if present in substantial numbers in the brain, can impact organismal fitness.
Discussion
Genomic mosaicism in the brain is the combined outcome of cumulative developmental and post-developmental somatic mutations, and cellular responses that correct or purge these mutations3,5,6. In this study, we manipulated somatic genome stability during embryonic brain development and gained insights into the robust mechanisms that eliminate cells with somatic genome damage from the brain, and the consequences of leaving somatic mutant cells unpurged.
Mammalian cells lack an aneuploidy checkpoint, and thus rely on the SAC to ensure correct chromosome segregation during mitosis as a safeguard against aneuploidy. By conditional deletion of Knl1 from NPCs, we found that disruption of the SAC did not inevitably lead to brain somatic aneuploidy. In mitotic NPCs, DNA damage on missegregated chromosomes was a potent trigger for rapid p53-dependent apoptotic and microglial mechanisms that efficiently cleared cells with segregation errors, thus leaving only karyotypically normal NPCs to continue dividing. Protection against brain somatic aneuploidy is therefore multilayered: (1) SAC delays anaphase onset until secure microtubule attachment on all chromosomes and (2) in the event of SAC disruption in NPCs, DNA damage on the resulting missegregated chromosomes triggers p53-dependent mechanisms to remove these cells. In the normal brain, these mechanisms rapidly eliminate the small proportion of NPCs with such genome damage, thereby maintaining genome stability. Applied en masse, as in Knl1 deletion, apoptotic elimination of these cells would lead to massive cell loss and microcephaly. In normal adult brain, the frequency of numerical aneuploidy remains controversial, with rates ranging from 0% to 47% in human brain and 0% to 57% in mouse brain52. Brain somatic aneuploidy arises from segregation errors in NPCs. Our finding that the resulting missegregated chromosomes carry DNA damage that triggers elimination of damaged cells is thus consistent with brain-derived somatic aneuploidy being rare in normal brain14.
KNL1 is expressed in mitotic cells and functions in the SAC, a mitotic checkpoint13,14. This role of KNL1 and the segregation errors in cKO NPCs convergently support mitosis as the point of primary deficit that ultimately elicited robust apoptotic responses following Knl1 deletion. This is consistent with our result that a majority of cells became apoptotic within 24 h of S-phase (Fig. 2). Furthermore, a human KNL1 mutation causes mitotic defects and cell death in hESC-derived neural progenitors33, providing support that the mitotic function of KNL1 in NPCs is conserved. We have not excluded the possibility that apoptosis can also occur post-mitosis after initial mitotic segregation errors. The minority of cells that were not rapidly eliminated within this time frame may undergo apoptosis by other mechanisms, including cell cycle delay. In addition, although microglia phagocytosis is efficient, following massive apoptosis in cKO, clearance of post-apoptotic cells may be delayed, thus explaining transient accumulation of cleaved caspase staining outside the germinal zones (Fig. 2).
Collectively, the DNA damage on missegregated chromosomes, the activation of p53 in NPCs, and the p53-DSB transcriptomic signature converge on DNA DSBs as the key trigger for rapid p53 activation following Knl1 deletion. The precise mechanisms that generate DSBs following missegregation remain unknown and would require technical advances from the field to resolve. There are several possibilities. Lagging chromosomes trapped in the cleavage furrow can acquire DSBs during cytokinesis44. However, physical cutting by the furrow is unlikely, as chromosome bridges would trigger the abscission checkpoint53. Micronuclei, formed when lagging chromosomes are excluded from either daughter nuclei, can also carry DNA damage43,54. It has been proposed that the micronuclear envelope is liable to rupture, which can expose DNA to cytoplasmic nucleases42, thus contributing to chromosomal pulverization and chromothripsis43,54. Consistent with this, we found no evidence of persistent micronuclei in postnatal cKO brain, suggesting that they had been eliminated by apoptosis following p53 activation. Furthermore, following SAC disruption, anaphase can proceed prematurely in the presence of under-replicated or insufficiently decatenated DNA, ultimately leading to ultrafine bridges55 that can contribute to DNA damage if not resolved during mitosis.
Although aneuploidy has been associated with p53 upregulation, whether aneuploidy itself can be the trigger for rapid p53 activation is debated14,56. Two recent studies have shown that numerical aneuploidy does not inevitably cause p53 activation42,57. However, p53 does respond to structural aneuploidies generated by segregation errors and chromosomal breaks. Consistent with these emerging data, Knl1 deletion in vivo led to DNA damage on missegregated chromosomes and rapid apoptosis, suggesting that mitotic DNA damage, not aneuploidy itself, triggered the rapid p53-dependent responses. Further supporting this, in Bub1bH/H hypomorphic mutant mice, widespread aneuploidy present in ~40% of brain cells7,58 did not cause massive apoptosis or developmental microcephaly59. However, we have not excluded the possibility that in the longer term, aneuploidy can contribute to apoptosis.
To investigate the consequence of disrupting both the SAC and p53-dependent safeguards against brain somatic aneuploidy, we co-deleted Trp53 with Knl1. Following Trp53 co-deletion, segregation errors and DNA damage persisted, but the robust transcriptional, apoptotic, and microglial phagocytic responses were largely abrogated. Without p53, NPCs with chromosome missegregation were not eliminated and widespread mosaic aneuploidy was present, thus confirming p53-dependent mechanisms as a second safeguard against brain somatic aneuploidy. Without massive elimination of somatic mutant cells, Trp53 co-deletion partially alleviated microcephaly resulting from Knl1 deletion, but paradoxically led to complete pre-weaning lethality. The precise cause of dKO lethality, however, is unknown. At the cellular level, aneuploidy, unrepaired DNA damage, or both could contribute. At the organismal level, dKO pups were able to breathe and suckle, and we have not been able to ascertain potential causes of pre-weaning death. Our results, however, do strongly support the possibility that somatic mutant cells derived from divisions in the absence of both SAC and p53-dependent safeguards, if present in substantial numbers, can affect brain and organismal fitness.
Altered SAC function has only recently emerged as a mechanism of microcephaly19,23. We found that SAC disruption in Knl1 cKO led to microcephaly, but likely not as a direct result of aneuploidy. Instead, SAC disruption caused frequent segregation errors in NPCs. DNA damage on the resulting missegregated chromosomes triggered robust removal of damaged cells, resulting in large-scale cell loss and microcephaly. Interestingly, centrosomal deficit can cause microcephaly and activate p53 without increasing γH2AX60, suggesting that centrosomal dysfunction does not inevitably cause DSBs, unlike Knl1 deletion. These results thus highlight mechanistic differences between SAC disruption and centrosomal dysfunction in microcephaly.
Microglia have emerged as key players in CNS development, homeostasis, and disease50,51,61. In Knl1 cKO, microglia underwent morphologic activation, increased in number, and exhibited a remarkable capacity for eliminating apoptotic cells with genome damage. Our work thus implicated a novel role for microglia in maintaining genome stability during embryonic development. Interestingly, recent work suggested that microglia can induce apoptosis of brain cells51,61. Thus, in vivo, microglia may accelerate apoptosis in addition to clearing apoptotic debris, playing more than one role in curtailing the propagation of cells with genome damage in the brain.
Methods
Mouse lines
A conditional-ready lacZ reporter Knl1 allele (Knl1tm1a(EUCOMM)Hmgu; EUCOMM (HEPD0665_2_E05)) was obtained from EUCOMM and recovered from cryopreserved spermatozoa at the University of Michigan Transgenic Core. The Knl1fl/fl conditional allele was generated by crossing with a Flpo recombinase transgene to remove the neomycin resistance gene cassette from the germline via FRT site recombination. Neomycin cassette-deletion was confirmed by PCR. The Knl1fl/fl mice were used to generate conditional mutants and genotyped by PCR. The mice used in this study were: p53LoxP (The Jackson Laboratory, Stock No. 008462), ROSA26Flpo (The Jackson Laboratory, Stock No. 012930), hGFAP-Cre (The Jackson Laboratory, Stock No. 004600), and Emx1-Cre (The Jackson Laboratory, Stock No. 005628). All experiments were carried out in compliance with ethical regulations for animal research. Our study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee.
Primary culture of mouse NPCs
Mouse NPCs were isolated from Knl1 cKO, Knl1;Trp53 dKO, and littermate control E15.5 cortices, enzymatically dissociated using Papain/Dispase/DNaseI (Worthington Biochemical), and cultured in neurobasal medium (GIBCO) supplemented with bFGF (GIBCO), B27 (GIBCO), Glutamax (Invitrogen), and penicilin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) on glass coverslips precoated with poly-l-ornithine and laminin.
Immunohistochemistry and confocal imaging
Embryonic and neonatal brains were dissected and fixed by immersion in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C. Mouse brains were sectioned at 70 µm with a Vibratome VT1000S (Leica). For immunostaining, brain sections were incubated in blocking solution containing 5% normal donkey serum (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories), 1% BSA, 0.1% glycine, 0.1% lysine, and 0.3% TritonX-100 in PBS for 1 h62. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4 °C in primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution, washed, and incubated with the appropriate fluorescent secondary antibodies and DAPI or processed for immunohistochemistry. Stained sections were mounted with VECTASHIELD Antifade Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories) and analyzed. Images were acquired with the Olympus confocal microscope FV1000. ImageJ and Photoshop were used for image processing. Primary antibodies: rabbit anti-SOX2 (Millipore,1:500), rat anti-SOX2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:500), rat anti-EOMES (TBR2) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:500), chicken anti-RBFOX3 (NEUN) (Millipore, 1:500), rabbit anti-cleaved Caspase-3 (CC3) (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:500), mouse anti-VIM (phospho-Ser55) (Enzo Life Sciences, 1:500), rat anti-BCL11B (Abcam, 1:500), rabbit anti-CUX1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:250), rabbit anti-KI67 (Abcam,1:250), rabbit anti-p53 (Leica Microsystems, 1:250), rabbit anti-histone H2A.X (phospho-Ser139) (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:250), rabbit anti-IBA1 (AIF1) (Wako, 1:500), rabbit anti-ADGRE1 (F4/80) (Abcam, 1:500), goat anti-POU3F2 (BRN2) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:250), rabbit anti-TBR1 (Abcam, 1:500), rabbit anti-phospho KAP1(S824) (Bethyl, 1:500), mouse anti-SATB2 (Abcam, 1:500), rat anti-CldU (Accurate Chemical and Scientific Corporation, 1:250), chicken anti-GFP (Abcam,1:500), rabbit anti-GFP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:500). Secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:250), Alexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rat IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:250), Alexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:250), Alexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure Bovine Anti-Goat IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:250), Alexa Fluor 594 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:250), Alexa Fluor 594 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:250), Alexa Fluor 594 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rat IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:250), Alexa Fluor 594 AffiniPure Bovine Anti-Goat IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:250).
RNA purification and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)
Total RNA was isolated from freshly microdissected embryonic 15.5 cortices using Trizol and RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit. 600 ng of RNA was used as input for cDNA synthesis using SuperScript III (Invitrogen). Diluted cDNA was used for expression level analysis using ddPCR (QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System, Bio-Rad). Probe sets (PrimeTime qPCR Probe Assays) were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. For ddPCR, the reaction mixture was prepared with template cDNA, 2XddPCR Supermix (No dUTP) (Bio-Rad), target probes with HEX fluorescence, and control probe against house-keeping gene Srp72 with FAM fluorescence. Oil droplets were generated with the QX200 droplet generator (Bio-Rad) and transferred to the C1000 Touch Thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) for thermocycling. Following PCR amplification, the droplets were analyzed in the QX200 droplet reader (Bio-Rad), which analyzed each droplet individually using a two-color detection system.
Primers
Primers and probes for ddRT-PCR:
Pvt1:
primer1 GCCACTGCCAATGTCTGT
primer2 CACTGAAAACAAGGACCGAAAC;
probe /56-FAM/TCCAGGTAG/Zen/CCCGAGAGATGACA/3IABkFQ/
Eda2r:
primer1 GCATCTACCTTCACTAAGCTCA
primer2 GTTCTACCGAAAGACACGCAT
probe /56-FAM/TGCATCCCA/Zen/TGTACAAAGCAGACTCC/3IABkFQ/
Ano3:
primer1 CGAAGAAAACTGTCCCTCCAT
primer2 GTCTTCATGTGTCCTCTATGTGA
probe /56-FAM/AGCTGTCGT/Zen/TGAGTCTCTGCAGTG/3IABkFQ/
Eomes:
primer1 CCAGAACCACTTCCACGAAA
primer2 CGGCACCAAACTGAGATGA
probe /56-FAM/TCAACATAA/Zen/ACGGACTCAACCCCACC/3IABkFQ/
Srp72:
primer1 CTCTCCTCATCATAGTCGTCCT
primer2 CTGAAGGAGCTTTATGGACAAGT
probe /5HEX/CCAAGCACT/Zen/CATCGTAGCGTTCCA/3IABkFQ/
Bbc3 (Puma):
primer1 AGAGATTGTACATGACCCTCCA
primer2 GACCTCAACGCGCAGTA
probe /56-FAM/CGGAGACAA/Zen/GAAGAGCAGCATCGA/3IABkFQ/
Genotyping primers:
Knl1_fl_200_F TCAGAATTTTGAGATGGCGCA
Knl1_WT_136_F GCTCAGTGGTATTTTGCCTAGC
Knl1_common_R AGAGTTTACCCTTTTCAACTGGA
LacZ cassette removal primers:
Knl1_lacZ_F CCTACCTTTGCCACCTGAGT
Knl1_lacZ_R GTTCCTGACCTGACTTCCCA
CIdU, IdU, and EdU labeling
Timed-pregnancies were obtained by detection of a vaginal plug (E0.5). Timed-pregnant mice were pulsed intraperitoneally with thymidine analogs CIdU, IdU, or EdU at 0.05 mg/g of body weight. Mice were analyzed for incorporation of CIdU or IdU using specific antibodies. Incorporation of EdU was analyzed by Click reaction using fluorescent azide.
Metaphase chromosome spread
Mouse NPCs were isolated from Knl1 cKO, Knl1;Trp53 dKO, and littermate control E14–15 embryonic cortices and cultured in Neurobasal Medium (GIBCO) supplemented with bFGF (GIBCO), B27 (GIBCO), Glutamax (Invitrogen), and Penicilin/Streptomycin (Invitrogen). Cells were cultured in less than 36 h, and treated with colcemid (10 ng/ml) and MG132 (10 μm) for 3 h. Cells were then subjected to hypotonic swelling (by incubating in 0.56% KCl) for 15 min and fixed in Carnoy’s fixative (75% methanol, 25% acetic acid). Chromosome spreads were prepared on clean, dry slides.
Comet assay
Single cell gel electrophoresis comet assay was performed using the SCGE assay Kit (Enzo Life Sciences). E14.5 embryonic cortices were dissected from Knl1 cKO, Knl1;Trp53 dKO, and littermate control, dissociated into single cells, and resuspended in pre-chilled PBS. Cells were mixed with low melting point agarose at a volume ratio of 1:50 and transferred in 100 μl aliquots onto pre-warmed slides. Slides were immersed in pre-chilled lysis solution for at least 1 h and placed in pre-chilled alkaline solution for 1 h. Electrophoresis was performed at 22 V in the TBE buffer for 30 min. Comets were stained with CYGREEN dye for 30 min and imaged.
Anaphase analysis
NPCs were cultured on coverslips and pulsed with EdU for 12 h. Cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min at room temperature and washed three times with PBS for about 20 min. Cells were then subjected to Click reaction using fluorescent azide and immunostained with γH2AX primary antibody as described above. DNA was counterstained with DAPI diluted in PBS for 5 min. Coverslips were mounted with VECTASHIELD Antifade Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories).
ClickSeq
RNA-seq libraries were generated using ClickSeq36. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen), treated with DNaseI, and cleaned and concentrated using the RNA Clean and Concentrator Kit (Zymo Research). Ribosomal RNA was removed using NEBNext rRNA Depletion Kit (NEB). ERCC RNA spike-in standards (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to assess library quality. Reverse transcription was carried out with SuperScript II (Invitrogen) using 1:30 5 mM AzdNTP:dNTP and 3′Genomic Adapter-6N RT primer (GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNN). The reaction was then treated with RNaseH to remove RNA template and cleaned using DNA Clean and Concentrator Kit (Zymo Research). The azido-terminated cDNA was diluted with DMSO and click adaptor (/5Hexynyl/NNNNNNNNAGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTGTAGGGAAAGAGTGTAGATCTCGGTGGTCGCCGTATCATT). The click reaction was initiated by adding Cu2+ (Lumiprobe) in the presence of vitamin C. The resulting click ligation was purified using DNA Clean and Concentrator Kit (Zymo).
The final amplification step was carried out using 2x One Taq Hot Start Mastermix (NEB), using Illumina universal primer (AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAG) and Illumina indexing primer (CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATNNNNNNGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGT). The PCR reaction was cleaned using Ampure XP magnetic beads (Beckman) at 1.25× ratio, which size-selects for product size above 200 bp. The resulting library was analyzed using TapeStation (Agilent) to check for proper size distribution and quality of DNA. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NextSeq 550 platform (75 cycles, high output) at the University of Michigan sequencing core.
RNA sequencing data analysis
RNA-seq data were subject to quality control check using FastQC v0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/download.html#fastqc). Adapter trimming was performed using cutadapt version 1.13 (http://cutadapt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/guide.html). Processed reads were aligned to the GENCODE GRCm38/mm10 reference genome (https://www.gencodegenes.org/mouse_releases/current.html) with STAR (v2.5.2a) and deduplicated according to UMI using UMI-tools (v0.5.3)63,64. Read counts were obtained with htseq-count (v0.6.1p1) with intersection-nonempty mode65. Differential expression was determined with edgeR37. The p-value was calculated with likelihood ratio tests and the adjusted p-value for multiple testing was calculated using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, which controls FDR. All RNA-seq data have been deposited in the GEO database (GSE114956).
Image data analysis
Image data quantification was performed using ImageJ or ImageJ (Fiji) with age-matched and spatially matched brain sections from mutants and control cortices.
Statistical analysis
Knl1 mutant and control group comparison statistical analysis were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software) using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. ERCC quantification performed by Salmon using ERCC Mix 1 sequences66. The mean and 95% confidence interval were calculated by aggregating all measurements of ERCC sequences of equal concentration across all samples. Gene lists associated with p53 activation and microglia were matched by gene symbol. Knl1 cKO and dKO intersectional comparison was performed using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Kwan laboratory for discussions and comments on the manuscript, John Moran for critical reading of the manuscript, and Thomas Wilson and David Turner for scientific discussions. We thank colleagues in the MBNI, Department of Human Genetics, and the Genome Instability Group at the University of Michigan, and the NIMH Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network (BSMN). This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 NS097525 and U01 MH106892 to K.Y.K. and F30-MH112328, T32-GM007544, and T32-GM007863 to J.M.K.), the Brain Research Foundation (BRFSG-2016-04 to K.Y.K.), Autism Science Foundation (fellowship to J.M.K.), March of Dimes Foundation (#5-FY15-33 to K.Y.K.), and Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (402213 and 324586 to K.Y.K.).
Author contributions
K.Y.K. conceived the study. L.S., M.M.L., and J.M.K. designed and performed the experiments. L.S., A.Q., and K.Y.K. analyzed the data, L.S., A.Q., J.M.K., and K.Y.K. wrote the paper.
Data availability
The RNA-seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited to NCBI GEO with the accession number GSE114956. The source data underlying Figs. 1–8 and Supplementary Figs. 1–6 are provided in a Source Data file.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-10411-w.
References
- 1.Kwan KY, Sestan N, Anton ES. Transcriptional co-regulation of neuronal migration and laminar identity in the neocortex. Development. 2012;139:1535–1546. doi: 10.1242/dev.069963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Silbereis JC, Pochareddy S, Zhu Y, Li M, Sestan N. The cellular and molecular landscapes of the developing human central nervous system. Neuron. 2016;89:248–268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McKinnon PJ. Maintaining genome stability in the nervous system. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:1523–1529. doi: 10.1038/nn.3537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kuan CY, Roth KA, Flavell RA, Rakic P. Mechanisms of programmed cell death in the developing brain. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:291–297. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01581-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McConnell Michael J., Moran John V., Abyzov Alexej, Akbarian Schahram, Bae Taejeong, Cortes-Ciriano Isidro, Erwin Jennifer A., Fasching Liana, Flasch Diane A., Freed Donald, Ganz Javier, Jaffe Andrew E., Kwan Kenneth Y., Kwon Minseok, Lodato Michael A., Mills Ryan E., Paquola Apua C. M., Rodin Rachel E., Rosenbluh Chaggai, Sestan Nenad, Sherman Maxwell A., Shin Joo Heon, Song Saera, Straub Richard E., Thorpe Jeremy, Weinberger Daniel R., Urban Alexander E., Zhou Bo, Gage Fred H., Lehner Thomas, Senthil Geetha, Walsh Christopher A., Chess Andrew, Courchesne Eric, Gleeson Joseph G., Kidd Jeffrey M., Park Peter J., Pevsner Jonathan, Vaccarino Flora M. Intersection of diverse neuronal genomes and neuropsychiatric disease: The Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network. Science. 2017;356(6336):eaal1641. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Paquola ACM, Erwin JA, Gage FH. Insights into the role of somatic mosaicism in the brain. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 2017;1:90–94. doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Knouse KA, Wu J, Whittaker CA, Amon A. Single cell sequencing reveals low levels of aneuploidy across mammalian tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:13409–13414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415287111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McConnell MJ, et al. Mosaic copy number variation in human neurons. Science. 2013;342:632–637. doi: 10.1126/science.1243472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bae T, et al. Different mutational rates and mechanisms in human cells at pregastrulation and neurogenesis. Science. 2018;359:550–555. doi: 10.1126/science.aan8690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lodato MA, et al. Somatic mutation in single human neurons tracks developmental and transcriptional history. Science. 2015;350:94–98. doi: 10.1126/science.aab1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Poduri A, Evrony GD, Cai X, Walsh CA. Somatic mutation, genomic variation, and neurological disease. Science. 2013;341:1237758. doi: 10.1126/science.1237758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee JH. Somatic mutations in disorders with disrupted brain connectivity. Exp. Mol. Med. 2016;48:e239. doi: 10.1038/emm.2016.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Foley EA, Kapoor TM. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;14:25–37. doi: 10.1038/nrm3494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santaguida S, Amon A. Short- and long-term effects of chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;16:473–485. doi: 10.1038/nrm4025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Silio V, McAinsh AD, Millar JB. KNL1-Bubs and RZZ provide two separable pathways for checkpoint activation at human kinetochores. Dev. Cell. 2015;35:600–613. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hanks S, et al. Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nat. Genet. 2004;36:1159–1161. doi: 10.1038/ng1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Baker DJ, Chen J, van Deursen JM. The mitotic checkpoint in cancer and aging: what have mice taught us? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005;17:583–589. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Szczepanski S, et al. A novel homozygous splicing mutation of CASC5 causes primary microcephaly in a large Pakistani family. Hum. Genet. 2016;135:157–170. doi: 10.1007/s00439-015-1619-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Genin A, et al. Kinetochore KMN network gene CASC5 mutated in primary microcephaly. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012;21:5306–5317. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Saadi A, et al. Refining the phenotype associated with CASC5 mutation. Neurogenetics. 2016;17:71–78. doi: 10.1007/s10048-015-0468-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zarate YA, et al. First clinical report of an infant with microcephaly and CASC5 mutations. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2016;170:2215–2218. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cox J, Jackson AP, Bond J, Woods CG. What primary microcephaly can tell us about brain growth. Trends Mol. Med. 2006;12:358–366. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mirzaa GM, et al. Mutations in CENPE define a novel kinetochore-centromeric mechanism for microcephalic primordial dwarfism. Hum. Genet. 2014;133:1023–1039. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1443-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rehen SK, et al. Constitutional aneuploidy in the normal human brain. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:2176–2180. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4560-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang AH, et al. Chromosome segregation defects contribute to aneuploidy in normal neural progenitor cells. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:10454–10462. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-32-10454.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nowakowski TJ, et al. Spatiotemporal gene expression trajectories reveal developmental hierarchies of the human cortex. Science. 2017;358:1318–1323. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Loo L, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of mouse neocortical development. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:134. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08079-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Diez-Roux G, et al. A high-resolution anatomical atlas of the transcriptome in the mouse embryo. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1000582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Consortium EP. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57–74. doi: 10.1038/nature11247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kang HJ, et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature. 2011;478:483–489. doi: 10.1038/nature10523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhuo L, et al. hGFAP-cre transgenic mice for manipulation of glial and neuronal function in vivo. Genesis. 2001;31:85–94. doi: 10.1002/gene.10008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gorski JA, et al. Cortical excitatory neurons and glia, but not GABAergic neurons, are produced in the Emx1-expressing lineage. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:6309–6314. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06309.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Omer Javed A, et al. Microcephaly modeling of kinetochore mutation reveals a brain-specific phenotype. Cell Rep. 2018;25:368–382 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jacobson MD, Weil M, Raff MC. Programmed cell death in animal development. Cell. 1997;88:347–354. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81873-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thomas MP, et al. Apoptosis triggers specific, rapid, and global mRNA decay with 3’ uridylated intermediates degraded by DIS3L2. Cell Rep. 2015;11:1079–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Routh A, Head SR, Ordoukhanian P, Johnson JE. ClickSeq: fragmentation-free next-generation sequencing via click ligation of adaptors to stochastically terminated 3’-Azido cDNAs. J. Mol. Biol. 2015;427:2610–2616. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Quintens R, et al. Identification of novel radiation-induced p53-dependent transcripts extensively regulated during mouse brain development. Biol. Open. 2015;4:331–344. doi: 10.1242/bio.20149969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brosh R, et al. p53-dependent transcriptional regulation of EDA2R and its involvement in chemotherapy-induced hair loss. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:2473–2477. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Barsotti AM, et al. p53-dependent induction of PVT1 and miR-1204. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:2509–2519. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.322875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Maya R, et al. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Mdm2 on serine 395: role in p53 activation by DNA damage. Genes Dev. 2001;15:1067–1077. doi: 10.1101/gad.886901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Santaguida S, et al. Chromosome mis-segregation generates cell-cycle-arrested cells with complex karyotypes that are eliminated by the immune system. Dev. Cell. 2017;41:638–651 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Crasta K, et al. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature. 2012;482:53–58. doi: 10.1038/nature10802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Janssen A, van der Burg M, Szuhai K, Kops GJPL, Medema RH. Chromosome segregation errors as a cause of DNA damage and structural chromosome aberrations. Science. 2011;333:1895–1898. doi: 10.1126/science.1210214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. Losing balance: the origin and impact of aneuploidy in cancer. EMBO Rep. 2012;13:501–514. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kastenhuber ER, Lowe SW. Putting p53 in context. Cell. 2017;170:1062–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McKinley KL, Cheeseman IM. Large-scale analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 cell-cycle knockouts reveals the diversity of p53-dependent responses to cell-cycle defects. Dev. Cell. 2017;40:405–420.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fischer M. Census and evaluation of p53 target genes. Oncogene. 2017;36:3943–3956. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang Y, et al. Purification and characterization of progenitor and mature human astrocytes reveals transcriptional and functional differences with mouse. Neuron. 2016;89:37–53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li Q, Barres BA. Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018;18:225–242. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Thion MS, Garel S. On place and time: microglia in embryonic and perinatal brain development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2017;47:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rosenkrantz JL, Carbone L. Investigating somatic aneuploidy in the brain: why we need a new model. Chromosoma. 2017;126:337–350. doi: 10.1007/s00412-016-0615-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Steigemann P, et al. Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization. Cell. 2009;136:473–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang CZ, et al. Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei. Nature. 2015;522:179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature14493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chan KL, Hickson ID. New insights into the formation and resolution of ultra-fine anaphase bridges. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 2011;22:906–912. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thompson SL, Compton DA. Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 2010;188:369–381. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200905057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Soto M, et al. p53 prohibits propagation of chromosome segregation errors that produce structural aneuploidies. Cell Rep. 2017;19:2423–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Baker DJ, et al. BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nat. Genet. 2004;36:744–749. doi: 10.1038/ng1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Choi CI, et al. The progeroid gene BubR1 regulates axon myelination and motor function. Aging. 2016;8:2667–2688. doi: 10.18632/aging.101032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Insolera R, Bazzi H, Shao W, Anderson KV, Shi SH. Cortical neurogenesis in the absence of centrioles. Nat. Neurosci. 2014;17:1528–1535. doi: 10.1038/nn.3831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Salter MW, Stevens B. Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat. Med. 2017;23:1018–1027. doi: 10.1038/nm.4397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kwan KY, et al. SOX5 postmitotically regulates migration, postmigratory differentiation, and projections of subplate and deep-layer neocortical neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:16021–16026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806791105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Smith T, Heger A, Sudbery I. UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome Res. 2017;27:491–499. doi: 10.1101/gr.209601.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited to NCBI GEO with the accession number GSE114956. The source data underlying Figs. 1–8 and Supplementary Figs. 1–6 are provided in a Source Data file.