Skip to main content
Plant Biotechnology logoLink to Plant Biotechnology
. 2019 Mar 20;36(1):29–37. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.19.0206a

Identification of genes regulated by a jasmonate- and salt-inducible transcription factor JRE3 in tomato

Ayman Abdelkareem 1,a, Chonprakun Thagun 1,b, Shunsuke Imanishi 2, Takashi Hashimoto 1, Tsubasa Shoji 1,*
PMCID: PMC6566006  PMID: 31275046

Abstract

In Solanum lycoperisicum (tomato), a transcription factor of APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR (AP2/ERF) family, JASMONATE-RESPONSIVE ERF 3 (JRE3), is a closest homolog of JRE4, a master transcriptional regulator of steroidal glycoalkaloid (SGA) biosynthesis. In tomato genome, JRE3 resides in a gene cluster with JRE4 and related JRE1, JRE2, and JRE5, while JRE6 exists as a singleton on a different chromosome. All of the JREs are induced by jasmonates (JAs), whereas sodium chloride (NaCl) treatment drastically increases the expression of the JREs except for JRE4 and JRE6. In this study, to get insights into the regulatory function of the JA- and NaCl-inducible JRE3, a series of genes upregulated by β-estradiol-induced overexpression of JRE3 are identified with microarray analysis in transgenic tomato hairy roots. No gene involved in the SGA pathway has been identified through the screening, confirming the functional distinction between JRE3 and JRE4. Among the JRE3-regulated genes, we characterize the stress-induced expression of genes encoding malate synthase and tonoplast dicarboxylate transporter both involved in malate accumulation. In transient transactivation assay, we reveal that both terminal regions of JRE4, but not a central DNA-binding domain, are indispensable for the induction of a gene involved in the JRE4 regulon. Functional differentiation of the JREs is discussed.

Keywords: ERF transcription factor, jasmonate, salt, steroidal glycoalkaloids, tomato

Introduction

Plants have developed tremendous abilities adapting to fluctuating environment, responding to a diverse range of biotic and abiotic stresses mainly by reprogramming gene expression. Transcriptional regulators play a central role integrating upstream signaling steps with expression of downstream genes involved in defense and adaptive mechanisms. A large number of genes encoding transcription factors, grouped into a handful of protein families, are present in plant genomes; the transcription factor families, such as APETALA2/ETHYLERNE RESPONSE FACTOR (AP2/ERF), bHLH, and MYB, have largely expanded in plants (Feller et al. 2011; Nakano et al. 2006). Transcription factors differentially respond to a wide range of environmental and developmental stimuli in multiple layers of signaling networks, ensuring adaptive plasticity of plants in nature.

Jasmonates (JAs) play a key signaling role in a diverse range of plant responses from elicitation of defense-related metabolic pathways to responses to abiotic stresses (Wasternack and Hause 2013). A group of JA-responsive transcription factors of AP2/ERF family, classified in clade II of subgroup IXa (Nakano et al. 2006; Shoji et al. 2013), such as ORCAs from Catharanthus roseus (Paul et al. 2017; van der Fits and Memelink 2000), ERF189 from tobacco (Shoji et al. 2010), and JASMONATE-RESPONSIVE ERF 4 (JRE4), or GLYCOALKALOD METABOLISM 9, from Solanum lycoperisicum (tomato) (Cárdenas et al. 2016; Nakayasu et al. 2018; Thagun et al. 2016), are involved in transcriptional regulation of unrelated specialized metabolic pathways in various plant species (Shoji 2018).

In tomato, JRE4 is a master transcriptional regulator of steroidal glycoalkaloid (SGA) biosynthesis (Nakayasu et al. 2018). As reported for its homologs from tobacco (Kajikawa et al. 2017) and C. roseus (Paul et al. 2017), in tomato genome, JRE4 resides in a tandem gene cluster with related JRE1, JRE2, JRE3, and JRE5 on chromosome I, while JRE6, also structurally related to them, is not in the cluster but present as a singleton on chromosome V (Thagun et al. 2016). In addition to response to JA common to all the JREs, the JREs except for JRE4 and JRE6 show basal expression at low levels and are strongly elicited with sodium chloride (NaCl) treatment, suggesting the involvement of these JREs in abiotic resistance rather than SGA regulation (Nakayasu et al. 2018). Indeed, it had been demonstrated that induced overexpression of JRE3, the closest functional homolog of JRE4, did not result in the induction of SGA pathways in tomato hairy roots (Nakayasu et al. 2018). In this study, to understand the regulatory role of JA- and NaCl-inducible JRE3, we conduct the microarray-based transcript profiling and identify a series of genes regulated by JRE3, including those involved in malate biosynthesis and accumulation. We discuss the functional differentiation of the mostly clustered JRE genes in tomato.

Materials and methods

Hairy root culture

The binary vectors pXVE-JRE3 for overexpression and pJRE3-EAR for dominant suppression had been generated in Nakayasu et al. (2018) and Thagun et al. (2016), respectively. The vectors were introduced into Agrobacterium rhizogenes ATC C15834 by electroporation. Sterilized seeds of Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom were germinated on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium solidified with 0.6% (w/v) agar and supplemented with 2% (w/v) sucrose. Hypocotyls from two-week-old seedlings were used for the infection as described (Thagun et al. 2016). Hairy roots emerging were excised and cultured three times every week on solidified MS medium containing 300 mg l−1 cefotaxime for disinfection and appropriate antibiotics for drug resistance selection. The selected transgenic lines were cultured every 8 days in 100 ml glass flasks filled with 25 ml of liquid Gamborg B5 medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) sucrose with shaking at 100 rpm in the dark.

qRT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the samples using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and converted to cDNA using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo). Using the cDNAs as templates, PCR was performed using a Light Cycler 96 (Roche) with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara) as described (Shoji et al. 2010). Primer sequences are given in Supplementary Table 1. EF1α (Solyc05g005060) was used as a reference gene.

Microarray analysis

Total RNA was isolated from hairy roots treated with β-estradiol at 100 µM for 12 h. Checking of RNA integrity, labelling of cRNA probes, hybridization of a tomato custom oligoarray, and data acquisition and processing were done as described (Thagun et al. 2016). Probes with low signal intensity (average values for the two controls <0.2) and variable intensities between lines (differences between the two controls >2.5-fold) were excluded from the analysis. Values relative to the controls were obtained by pairwise comparisons and averaged. Up-regulated (>3-fold) are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. A list of gene up-regulated by induced overexpression of JRE3 in transgenic tomato hairy roots. Probes and corresponding genes are ordered according to fold change values.

Probe ID Accession Gene ID Annotation Fold change Note
TowgeN_I_39209 AI781582 Solyc12g006380 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase 8.840322627
TowgeN_I_18907 AW648100 Solyc03g111140 Malate synthase 8.234575349 *2, *3
TowgeN_I_13980 BE458907 Solyc08g082970 FAS-associated factor 7.609107197
TowgeN_I_35461 AW615959 Solyc11g012200 Wax synthase 6.309291351 *1, *4
TowgeN_I_24215 BE354617 Solyc05g007020 Potassium voltage-gated channel 5.792815471
TowgeN_I_20544 TC180353 Solyc12g011410 Unknown protein 5.376263687
TowgeN_I_25911 TC185720 Solyc01g080680 Sugar facilitator protein 3 5.108688383 *1
TowgeN_I_48778 AI776728 Solyc03g043740 Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein 4.975912183 *2
TowgeN_I_22317 TC182126 Solyc05g009170 Zinc finger family 4.965013863
TowgeN_I_25497 TC185306 Solyc11g012360 Tonoplast dicarboxylate transporter 4.930313696 *3, *4
TowgeN_I_29299 TC189108 Solyc10g078720 MYB family transcription factor 4.85158986
TowgeN_I_49124 AI778123 Solyc01g010770 Hypersensitive-induced response protein 4.8211947
TowgeN_I_47464 AW625285 Solyc01g009935 SAUR-like auxin-responsive 4.55383965
TowgeN_I_44891 BG132464 Solyc07g021180 ATP synthase subunit beta 4.524328714
TowgeN_I_41543 BP876253 Solyc08g079020 Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase-like protein 4.474134291
TowgeN_I_28695 AW219535 Solyc03g031530 Sulfite exporter 4.416792363
TowgeN_I_42296 BP881103 Solyc06g084140 Sulfate transporter 4.314994722 *2
TowgeN_I_31166 TC190975 Solyc01g006780 Nitrate reductase 4.310660258 *4
TowgeN_I_40284 AW621208 Solyc06g075660 MYB family protein 4.263023623 *2
TowgeN_I_50753 AW036111 Solyc11g051090 Sulfotransferase 4.220919529
TowgeN_I_47590 BF097299 Solyc01g006660 Subtilisin-like protease 4.205077454
TowgeN_I_28691 TC188500 Solyc05g056430 Small auxin up-regulated RNA56 SlSAUR56 4.191859756
TowgeN_I_48471 BG127874 Solyc06g008920 AMP dependent ligase 4.111344048
TowgeN_I_51374 AW621504 Solyc02g032550 Apyrase 4.078820069
TowgeN_I_26159 TC185968 Solyc07g047950 GRAS family transcription factor 4.070848818
TowgeN_I_21911 TC181720 Solyc02g084980 Hexosyltransferase 3.982044619
TowgeN_I_46572 AW031420 Solyc04g079240 Patatin 3.948301885
TowgeN_I_27740 TC187549 Solyc04g080820 Cytokinin oxidase4 3.923788624
TowgeN_I_14317 TC174126 Solyc05g011860 Sulfotransferase 3.917782001
TowgeN_I_47603 BF096561 Solyc03g113490 HIPL1-like protein 3.914651814
TowgeN_I_43348 DY523780 Solyc10g084950 Major facilitator superfamily protein 3.894891506
TowgeN_I_14980 TC174790 Solyc08g081540 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase 3.878530849
TowgeN_I_11251 TC171060 Solyc12g096770 Acyl-transferase 3.834529274
TowgeN_I_21735 TC181544 Solyc11g072800 Respiratory burst oxidase-like protein 3.834514454
TowgeN_I_49906 AI782504 Solyc05g006740 Glutathione S-transferase 3.81732516 *4
TowgeN_I_51360 AW622335 Solyc03g005820 Purine permease 3.805744513
TowgeN_I_29033 TC188842 Solyc03g112320 Ferric reduction oxidase 8 3.792445194
TowgeN_I_29740 TC189549 Solyc08g082440 UDP-glucose 4-epimerase 3.775583825
TowgeN_I_42041 BP882954 Solyc05g052870 Glycosyltransferase 3.771290476
TowgeN_I_21955 TC181764 Solyc06g082470 MAP kinase kinase kinase 42 3.769692059
TowgeN_I_42592 BP888894 Solyc02g093750 C3H4 type zinc finger protein (DUF23) 3.762826536
TowgeN_I_37530 AW096562 Solyc12g009920 Glycosyltransferase 3.744698232 *1
TowgeN_I_29454 TC189263 Solyc02g091350 Glycosyltransferase 3.737364945 *2
TowgeN_I_48975 BE353810 Solyc04g078340 Cytochrome P450 3.729097043
TowgeN_I_47164 AW039590 Solyc04g079230 Patatin 3.728356964
TowgeN_I_48056 AW041547 Solyc03g121960 Phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase 3.700317129 *1
TowgeN_I_26135 TC185944 Solyc01g010000 ACT domain containing protein 3.688132634 *4
TowgeN_I_13226 TC173035 Solyc12g008800 Myb-like transcription factor family protein 3.568294038
TowgeN_I_26381 TC186190 Solyc06g007180 Asparagine synthetase 1 3.533410617
TowgeN_I_51343 AW622109 Solyc09g064910 Adenylate isopentenyltransferase 3.515774315
TowgeN_I_15800 TC175609 Solyc01g067510 Kinase family protein 3.51500259 *1
TowgeN_I_50449 AW621226 Solyc09g011140 NAD(P)-binding Rossmann-fold superfamily protein 3.506256872
TowgeN_I_29450 TC189259 Solyc10g008880 Zinc finger transcription factor 56 3.494804048
TowgeN_I_42846 BW687235 Solyc11g061720 Kinase family protein 3.493840526
TowgeN_I_43350 DY523803 Solyc12g056920 Sulfate transporter, putative 3.470526638
TowgeN_I_14379 TC174188 Solyc06g062450 Leucine-rich repeat protein kinase family protein 3.452331472
TowgeN_I_23218 TC183027 Solyc01g100870 ADP-ribosylation factor 3.449704049
TowgeN_I_50177 AW649767 Solyc08g078460 Oxidoreductase family protein 3.447480684
TowgeN_I_26454 TC186263 Solyc07g049480 Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 3.442228191
TowgeN_I_15970 TC175779 Solyc03g098300 Ornithine decarboxylase 2 3.429649622
TowgeN_I_21699 TC181508 Solyc02g078140 MAP kinase kinase kinase 18 3.425866243
TowgeN_I_48767 AI776395 Solyc06g036100 Divalent ion symporter 3.413269463
TowgeN_I_14074 TC173883 Solyc03g111710 BTB/POZ and TAZ domain protein 3.411298941
TowgeN_I_20210 TC180019 Solyc06g073780 SMC3 3.40680547
TowgeN_I_45230 BE460239 Solyc05g053210 Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase 3.391249538
TowgeN_I_41066 BP896342 Solyc01g103530 Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase 3.374259073
TowgeN_I_18861 TC178670 Solyc07g064990 S-adenosyl-L-methionine:carboxyl methyltransferase 3.352060136
TowgeN_I_20668 TC180477 Solyc04g080640 Transmembrane protein 3.349830423 *2
TowgeN_I_33154 BG134398 Solyc09g092690 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 3.325411622
TowgeN_I_45161 BG133925 Solyc02g091800 Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) DNA-binding 3.302306767
TowgeN_I_28820 TC188629 Solyc02g065555 Calcium uniporter, mitochondrial 3.290817773
TowgeN_I_49976 BF051803 Solyc01g005970 F-box/kelch-repeat protein 3.265670529
TowgeN_I_24560 TC184369 Solyc10g084120 Plasma membrane intrinsic protein 3.255459286
TowgeN_I_42115 BP883380 Solyc02g080480 Protein DETOXIFICATION 3.249495054
TowgeN_I_37983 BG124520 Solyc08g007690 Subtilisin-like protease 3.246824931
TowgeN_I_24063 TC183872 Solyc08g075870 S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent methyltransferases 3.239419244
TowgeN_I_36375 AW738299 Solyc07g007550 Heparanase-like protein 3.231822441
TowgeN_I_47679 AW651102 Solyc03g116060 Exostosin family protein 3.22526528
TowgeN_I_43501 DV104119 Solyc06g034110 Tomato acid phosphatase 3.216968392
TowgeN_I_27030 TC186839 Solyc01g108700 Transcription initiation factor 3.213443767
TowgeN_I_47491 AW616780 Solyc02g070110 FAD-binding berberine family protein 3.211792843
TowgeN_I_32748 BI422443 Solyc04g074790 RING/U-box superfamily protein 3.193724338
TowgeN_I_45240 BE435020 Solyc02g086990 Cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 3.190535531
TowgeN_I_13650 TC173459 Solyc09g091550 S-adenosyl-L-methionine: salicylic acid carboxyl methylt 3.17512396
TowgeN_I_30217 TC190026 Solyc08g067700 Serine/threonine protein kinase 3.172859891
TowgeN_I_43870 BP907126 Solyc01g059880 ATP-citrate synthase 3.168109684
TowgeN_I_10534 TC170343 Solyc08g074680 Polyphenol oxidase precursor 3.166421179
TowgeN_I_20017 TC179826 Solyc05g011890 Sulfotransferase 3.157142167
TowgeN_I_34040 AW033986 Solyc07g006670 HXXXD-type acyl-transferase family protein 3.153891903
TowgeN_I_24915 TC184724 Solyc11g009010 Alpha/beta-Hydrolases superfamily protein 3.102475372
TowgeN_I_30181 TC189990 Solyc07g045040 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase 3.092060801
TowgeN_I_40325 BE450404 Solyc02g079360 Octicosapeptide/Phox/Bem1p family protein 3.078824883
TowgeN_I_37878 AW932987 Solyc01g109800 Transmembrane protein 3.077517888
TowgeN_I_27195 TC187004 Solyc12g007320 RING/U-box superfamily protein 3.075999103
TowgeN_I_46652 BI921560 Solyc10g044783 ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit 3.052592382
TowgeN_I_40348 BE451290 Solyc02g087990 DUF1666 3.052213638
TowgeN_I_26450 TC186259 Solyc12g036390 Calmodulin binding protein-like 3.051413806
TowgeN_I_15077 TC174886 Solyc09g009100 Heat shock protein 3.051108382
TowgeN_I_16183 TC175992 Solyc02g070680 Cytochrome P450 3.049949544
TowgeN_I_47804 BF096424 Solyc05g050970 Transketolase 3.049737503
TowgeN_I_15268 TC175077 Solyc07g043590 Amine oxidase 3.040318989
TowgeN_I_26075 TC185884 Solyc03g118900 WAT1-related protein 3.038199592
TowgeN_I_15511 TC175320 Solyc03g025290 Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein 3.037109971
TowgeN_I_32692 AW030425 Solyc12g088460 Cytochrome P450 3.035740301
TowgeN_I_25008 TC184817 Solyc08g014440 BTB/POZ and TAZ domain protein 3.035088135
TowgeN_I_46677 BI922244 Solyc03g097610 Bidirectional sugar transporter 3.030863435
TowgeN_I_27020 TC186829 Solyc03g080060 Clade XV lectin receptor kinase 3.029775913
TowgeN_I_27009 TC186818 Solyc12g088190 Amino acid permease 3.022255618
TowgeN_I_18723 TC178532 Solyc08g082670 Cellulose synthase 3.017261534
TowgeN_I_46583 AW031705 Solyc08g029000 Lipoxygenase 3.01425783
TowgeN_I_50048 AW930492 Solyc01g100630 Catalase 3.010049202

In the row of note, genes are marked with asterisks associated with numbers; *1 identified in Thagun et al. (2016), *2 identified in Lashbrooke et al. (2016), *3 studied in detail, *4 represented by mutliple probes.

Transient transactivation assay

The cDNA portions of JRE3 and JRE4, terminal regions and a central DNA-binding domain, were separately amplified with primers (Supplementary Table 2), some of which were designed to contain the sequences that are shared between the two JREs and are from the adjacent regions, or partial sequences of attB1 and attB2 adapters for subsequent cloning. To join the fragments, certain three out of the six amplicons were combined and amplified by PCR with a pair of most outer primers. The jointed products were amplified once more by PCR with appropriate primers to attach full-length attB1 and attB2 sequences at the ends. The chimeric and native fragments for JRE3 and JRE4 with the adapter sequences were cloned into pDONR/Zeo, and then transferred into pGWB17 (Nakagawa et al. 2007) using Gateway cloning technology (Invitrogen). The vectors, p19 for P19 silencing suppressor (Voinnet et al. 2003) and p35S-GFP for the GFP reference gene, were used.

Transient transactivation assay was performed as described (Thagun et al. 2016). The bacterial suspensions for JRE-containing vectors plus those for p19 and p35S-GFP were combined, and the resultant solution was injected into mature green fruits. Gene expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR using fruits harvested 3 day after injection.

Results

A series of genes upregulated by β-estradiol-induced overexpression of JRE3 in tomato hairy roots

We had demonstrated that β-estradiol-induced overexpression of JRE4 but not JRE3 activates SGA biosynthesis genes and increases the accumulation of the alkaloids in transgenic tomato hairy roots (Nakayasu et al. 2018). To get insights into the regulatory function of JRE3, microarray-based transcript profiling was conducted using transgenic tomato hairy roots. One of the transgenic lines for induced overexpression of JRE3 (line OX1), which had been established previously (Nakayasu et al. 2018), and two control lines transformed with an empty vector (EV), line EV1 and EV2, were treated with β-estradiol at 100 µM for 12 h. The chemical-induced overexpresion of JRE3 in the OX1 line was confirmed by qRT-PCR (Supplementary Figure 1). RNAs prepared from the lines were labelled with Cyanine 3 and hybridized to a tomato custom oligo-array representing over 40,000 transcripts. After excluding probes with low and variable signal intensities in the controls, probes and corresponding genes up-regulated over 3 folds in the line OX1 relative to the controls were listed in Table 1; when represented by multiple probes, probes with higher fold change values were adapted, and probes with no match to the coding sequences (BLASTN with cut-off score 1e-10) were excluded.

Consistent with a previous study (Nakayasu et al. 2018), no SGA biosynthesis genes were included in Table 1, confirming that JRE3 does not regulate the SGA pathway. The genes down-regulated by dominant suppression of JRE3 in tomato hairy roots had been identities in a similar microarray setting (Thagun et al. 2016). Although number of overlapping genes is limited, five genes are commonly identified in the both microarray-based screenings; wax synthase (Solyc11g012200), sugar facilitator protein 3 (Solyc01g080680), glycosyltransferase (Solyc12g009920), phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (Solyc03g121960) and kinase family protein (Solyc01g067510). Interestingly, we also found that six genes in Table 1 [malate synthase (Solyc03g111140), hydroxyproline rich glycoprotein (Solyc03g043740), sulfate transporter (Solyc06g084140), MYB family protein (Solyc06g075660), glycosyltransferase (Solyc02g091350) and transmembrane protein (Solyc04g080640)] are among 655 genes reported to be co-expressed with suberin biosynthesis genes in tomato (Lashbrooke et al. 2016).

We subjected the up-regulated genes (Table 1) to Gene Ontology (GO) analysis using the PANTHER classification system (Table 2) (Mi et al. 2013). Significant enrichments were detected for two GO terms, catalytic activity (p=8.11e-11) and its downstream term transferase (p=7.6e-5), in the domain of molecular function.

Table 2. Gene Ontology analysis of the genes up-regulated by induced overexpression of JRE3 in transgenic tomato hairy roots.

GO term GO number number of genes
Molecular function
catalytic activity GO:0003824 37
transporter activity GO:0005215 10
binding GO:0005488 9
receptor activity GO:0004872 3
singal transducer activity GO:0004871 2
antioxidant activity GO:0016209 1
structural molecule activity GO:0005198 1
Biological process
metabolic process GO:0008152 31
cellular process GO:0009987 29
response to stimulus GO:0050896 8
localization GO:0051179 7
biological regulation GO:0065007 5
cellular component organization or biogenesis GO:0071840 1
Cellular component
cell part GO:0044464 21
membrane GO:0016020 14
organelle GO:0043226 11
cell junction GO:0030054 2
macromolecular complex GO:0032991 1

Regulation of malate synthase and tonoplast dicarboxylate transporter genes

Among the genes in Table 1, we were interested in a pair of genes encoding malate synthase (MLS; Solyc03g111140) and tonoplast dicarboxylate transporter (TDT; Solyc11g012360), which were up-regulated in the microarray analysis about 8.2 and 4.9 folds, respectively (Table 1), and both involved in malate accumulation (Liu et al. 2017). To further characterize the regulation of the genes by JRE3, we analyzed the expression levels of MLS and TDT by qRT-PCR in transgenic tomato hairy roots. In line OX2 (different from the line OX1 used in the microarray analysis), β-estradiol-induced overexpression of JRE3 resulted in 28- and 4-folds inductions of MLS and TDT relative to the control (Figure 1A), validating the results of the microarray analysis. The dominant suppressive form of JRE3 was prepared by attaching an ERF-associated amphiphilic repression motif (Hiratsu et al. 2003) to its C-terminal end and was placed under the control of a constitutive promoter. In two lines CR1 and CR2 for JRE3 suppression, expression levels of MLS and TDT decreased markedly to 0.17 to 0.43 folds levels (Figure 1B). These results indicated that functionality of JRE3 is co-related both positively and negatively with the expression of MLS and TDT, suggesting the regulation of these genes by the transcriptional regulator.

Figure 1. Expression of MLS and TDT genes in transgenic tomato hairy root lines with altered JRE3 function. Five-day-old hairy roots of OX2, CR1, CR2, and empty vector (EV)-introduced control lines were used. To induce overexpression of JRE3 in line OX2, hairy roots were treated with β-estradiol at 100 µM for 12 h. Transcript levels were measured by qRT-PCR, and are shown relative to the EV1 line. Error bars represent standard deviations for three biological replicates. Significant differences between the control and each treatment were determined by Student’s t-test; ** p<0.01, * p<0.05. Shared letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05 (ANOVA followed with Tukey–Kramer test).

Figure 1. Expression of MLS and TDT genes in transgenic tomato hairy root lines with altered JRE3 function. Five-day-old hairy roots of OX2, CR1, CR2, and empty vector (EV)-introduced control lines were used. To induce overexpression of JRE3 in line OX2, hairy roots were treated with β-estradiol at 100 µM for 12 h. Transcript levels were measured by qRT-PCR, and are shown relative to the EV1 line. Error bars represent standard deviations for three biological replicates. Significant differences between the control and each treatment were determined by Student’s t-test; ** p<0.01, * p<0.05. Shared letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05 (ANOVA followed with Tukey–Kramer test).

To further address the functional link between JA- and NaCl-inducible JRE3 and its downstream genes MLS and TDT, we examined the responses of the genes to JA, NaCl and high osmolality in tomato hairy roots. As reported (Nakayasu et al. 2018; Thagun et al. 2016), JRE3 was induced strongly by methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and NaCl, while substantial induction of JRE4 occurred by MeJA but not by the abiotic stressors (Figure 2). MLS was induced by NaCl and mannitol, while the salt treatment induced TDT (Figure 2). In contrast to clear induction of JRE3 in response to JA, the phytohormone did not alter the expression levels of MLS and TDT (Figure 3).

Figure 2. Response of MLS and TDT genes to JA, NaCl, and high osmolality in tomato hairy roots. Five-day-old hairy roots were treated with methyl jasmonate (MeJA) at 100 µM, NaCl at 300 mM, or mannitol at 300 mM for 5 h. Transcript levels were measured by qRT-PCR, and are shown relative to untreated controls. Error bars represent standard deviations for three biological replicates. Shared letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05 (ANOVA followed with Tukey–Kramer test).

Figure 2. Response of MLS and TDT genes to JA, NaCl, and high osmolality in tomato hairy roots. Five-day-old hairy roots were treated with methyl jasmonate (MeJA) at 100 µM, NaCl at 300 mM, or mannitol at 300 mM for 5 h. Transcript levels were measured by qRT-PCR, and are shown relative to untreated controls. Error bars represent standard deviations for three biological replicates. Shared letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05 (ANOVA followed with Tukey–Kramer test).

Figure 3. Transient transactivation analysis of JRE4, JRE3, and their chimeric fusions in tomato fruits. Regions, N- and C-terminal and central DNA-binding domains, in JRE4 and JRE3 were depicted schematically and amino acid identities in the same region between the JREs were shown in (A). The vectors for native and chimeric JREs, schematically shown in (B), or empty vector (EV) and GFP reference vector were co-delivered into tomato mature green fruits by agroinjection. Transcript levels of MKB1were normalized against those of GFP, and are shown relative to those of the EV controls (B). Error bars indicate the standard deviations for three biological replicates. Shared letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05 (ANOVA followed with Tukey–Kramer test).

Figure 3. Transient transactivation analysis of JRE4, JRE3, and their chimeric fusions in tomato fruits. Regions, N- and C-terminal and central DNA-binding domains, in JRE4 and JRE3 were depicted schematically and amino acid identities in the same region between the JREs were shown in (A). The vectors for native and chimeric JREs, schematically shown in (B), or empty vector (EV) and GFP reference vector were co-delivered into tomato mature green fruits by agroinjection. Transcript levels of MKB1were normalized against those of GFP, and are shown relative to those of the EV controls (B). Error bars indicate the standard deviations for three biological replicates. Shared letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05 (ANOVA followed with Tukey–Kramer test).

Regions of JRE4 indispensable for transactivation of MAKIBISHI1 gene

Transient overexpression of JRE4 but not JRE3 activate the promoter reporters of SGA biosynthesis genes, DWF5-2 and GAME4, in tomato fruits (Nakayasu et al. 2018; Thagun et al. 2016). We found that an endogenous gene MAKIBISHI1 (MKB1) (Pollier et al. 2013), encoding a RING-finger E3 ubiquitin ligase and being involved in JRE4 regulon (Thagun et al. 2016), was clearly activated by JRE4 in this experimental system as well, while such induction did not occur with JRE3 (Figure 3).

To examine the transactivation activity of JRE3 in parallel with JRE4 in the same transient system, we tried to find the genes induced by JRE3 among those in Table 1. But unfortunately we could not demonstrate the JRE3-dependent induction for any examined genes, including MLS and TDT, in the transactivation assay. Such unsuccessful outcome was considered to be in part resulted from difference of tissues, hairy roots and fruits, used in the analyses. Thus we put the focus on the transactivation activity of JRE4 in the following part.

To reveal which portions of JRE4 are important for its transactivation activity, chimeric fusions between JRE4 and JRE3 were generated and the activities of these fusions were examined in the transient expression analysis as MKB1 expression as an indicator of downstream gene activation. The JREs were divided into three portions, a relatively conserved central DNA-binding domain and more variable terminal regions at the both ends (Figure 3A), and chimera of various combinations (Figure 3B) were constructed. Among the native and chimeric JREs analyzed, native JRE4 and a chimeric construct including both N- and C-terminal regions of JRE4 and a DNA-binding domain of JRE3 (c434) were able to significantly activate the expression of endogenous MKB1 to 78.6 and 40.1 folds respectively relative to the control, while other fusions, including those containing either terminal region of JRE4 (c433, c334), did not have major impacts on MKB1 expression levels (Figure 3B). These results indicated that both N- and C-terminal regions of JRE4, but not a DNA-binding domain, are indispensable to JRE4-mediated transactivation of the SGA pathway genes.

Discussion

Clustering of JRE genes (Cárdenas et al. 2016; Thagun et al. 2016) and their counterparts in other plants (Kajikawa et al. 2017; Paul et al. 2017), suggest the emergence of the homologous genes through tandem duplication, pointing common ancestry of the genes. Based on the phylogenetic relationships of the clustered genes from different species, the duplication leading to cluster formation is presumed to occur independently in distinct plant lineages (Shoji 2018). In tomato and tobacco of Solanaceae family, a single gene that commonly resides around a middle of the clusters, such as ERF189 and JRE4, play a predominant role as a regulator of alkaloid biosynthesis in respective species (Kajikawa et al. 2017; Nakayasu et al. 2018; Shoji 2018). On the other hand, other clustered ERFs, which are considered more ancestral than the alkaloid regulators because of their relatively marginal positions in the clusters (Shoji 2018) and other structural and expressional evidences (Shoji et al. 2013), do not largely contribute to the alkaloid regulation; the elicitation of the non-alkaloidal ERFs by NaCl in tobacco (Shoji and Hashimoto 2015) and tomato (Nakayasu et al. 2018) is one of the circumstantial evidences supporting the notion. The response to NaCl and JA is considered a fundamental and so ancestral property of ERFs of this clade, which is also conserved in a counterpart AtERF13 (At2g44840) in Arabidopsis (Lee et al. 2010). Given such expressional conservation of the non-alkaloidal factors, rise of the more specialized alkaloid regulators from them is assumed to rely on adjustment of expression patterns, including the elimination of the response to NaCl.

To gain cues into the functions of JA- and salt-inducible ERFs, which may be ancestral to the alkaloid regulators, we identified a series of gene regulated by JRE3, a closest homolog of JRE4, in tomato hairy roots (Table 1). JRE3 regulates a diverse range of genes associated with various GO terms (Table 2). Such non-specialized manner of gene regulation by JRE3 is stark contrast to the case of JRE4 devoted to SGA regulation. The existence of multiple ancestral factors like JRE3, which may be functionally redundant and not committed to certain processes at least as a single factor and thus ready for assignment to specific roles, seems convenient to allow afterward establishment of metabolic regulons, such as those of JRE4 and ERF189, possibly through repeated recruitments of metabolic genes (Shoji 2018). In the sense of metabolic evolution, it is indicative that GO terms, catalytic activity and transferase, are enriched among the JRE3-regulated genes. To reveal possibly frequent rewiring of gene networks (Johnson 2017), which is considered prerequisite for rise of the metabolic regulons (Shoji 2018), it is worth to address whether and if so how much genes regulated by are shared among the non-alkaloidal ERFs from same and different species.

JRE3 regulates a pair of genes encoding MLS and TDT involved in malate accumulation (Table 1, Figure 1). MLS is an acyltransferase involved in glyoxylate cycle, catalyzing an irreversible condensation of acetyl-CoA with glyoxylate to form malate. A tonoplast-localized membrane transporter TDT mediate vacuolar uptake of malate, and altered expression of the transporter gene has major impacts on malate contents in vacuoles (Emmerlich et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2017). In addition to its metabolic function, malate contributes to plant tolerance to aluminum toxicity by chelating the metal ion (Chen and Liao 2016) and osmotic imbalance as osmoticm (Dong et al. 2018). In Arabidopsis, AtMLS (At5g03860) and AtTDT (At5g47560) are induced by NaCl and mannitol, reflecting the roles of the organic acid in abiotic tolerance (Arabidopsis eFP Browser 2.0). In line with that, we observed the induction of MLS and TDT by these stresses in tomato as well (Figure 2). It has yet to be addressed whether altered JRE3 function has significant impacts on malate accumulation in tomato. Suberin is deposited as a protective barrier in response to environmental stresses, such as drought and wounding (Vishwanath et al. 2015). In this regard, it is curious that the JRE3-regulated genes were also found among the genes co-expressed with suberin biosynthesis genes (Table 1) (Lashbrooke et al. 2016).

We tried to reveal the molecular basis of functional distinction between JRE3 and SGA-regulating JRE4. To this end, transient transactivation assay was conducted with JRE3, JRE4, and their chimeras in tomato fruits (Figure 3). Unfortunately we could not find the JRE3-dependent transactivation of any genes examined in the transient system, which were regulated by JRE3 in tomato hairy roots, while evident induction of MKB1 by JRE4 was demonstrated. Using MKB1 expression as a marker of downstream gene activation, we found that both N- and C-terminal regions variable between JRE3 and JRE4 rather than a relatively conserved central DNA-binding domain are indispensable for the JRE4-mediated transactivation of MKB1, suggesting that molecular mechanisms, such as physical interaction with other factors through the terminal regions, rather than DNA binding, is critical for the functional differentiation between the JREs.

In conclusion, a series of genes regulated by JA- and salt-inducible JRE3 were identified through microarray analysis in transgenic tomato hairy roots. JRE3 regulates a diverse range of genes, including MLS and TDT involved in malate accumulation. These results give insights into the evolution of the alkaloid regulators from ancestral ones, which may be related to JA- and NaCl-inducible ERFs, such as JRE3. Transient transactivation analysis revealed that relatively variable terminal regions at the both ends rather than a conserved central DNA-binding domain of JRE4 is required for its transactivation of a gene involved in JRE4 regulon.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ayaka Tsujii (NAIST) for the technical assistance and Drs. Tsuyoshi Nakagawa (Shimane University) and Yoshinori Yagi (Nagoya University) for providing the pGWB17 and p35S-GFP vectors, respectively. The tomato seeds were provided by the National BioResource Project (NBRP), MEXT, Japan. This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research number 17K07447 to TS).

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data

References

  1. Cárdenas PD, Sonawane PD, Pollier J, Vanden Bossche R, Dewangan V, Weithorn E, Tal L, Meir S, Rogachev I, Malitsky S, et al. (2016) GAME9 regulates the biosynthesis of steroidal alkaloids and upstream isoprenoids in the plant mevalonate pathway. Nat Commun 7: 10654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen ZC, Liao H (2016) Organic acid anions: An effective defensive weapon for plants against aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in acidic soils. J Genet Genomics 43: 631–638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dong H, Bai L, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Mao Y, Min L, Xiang F, Qian D, Zhu X, Song CP (2018) Modulation of guard cell turgor and drought tolerance by a peroxisomal acetate-malate shunt. Mol Plant 11: 1278–1291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Emmerlich V, Linka N, Reinhold T, Hurth MA, Traub M, Martinoia E, Neuhaus HE (2003) The plant homolog to human sodium/dicarboxylic cotransforter is the vacuolar malate carrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 11122–11126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Feller A, Machemer K, Braun EL, Grotewold E (2011) Evolutionary and comparative analysis of MYB and bHLH plant transcription factors. Plant J 66: 94–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hiratsu K, Matsui K, Koyama T, Ohme-Takagi M (2003) Dominant repression of target genes by chimeric repressors that include the EAR motif, a repression domain, in Arabidopsis. Plant J 34: 733–739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson AD (2017) The rewiring of transcription circuits in evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 47: 121–127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kajikawa M, Sierro N, Kawaguchi H, Bakaher N, Ivanov NV, Hashimoto T, Shoji T (2017) Genomic insights into the evolution of the nicotine biosynthesis pathway in tobacco. Plant Physiol 174: 999–1011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lashbrooke J, Cohen H, Levy-Samocha D, Tzfadia O, Panizel I, Zeisler V, Massalha H, Stern A, Trainotti L, Schreiber L, et al. (2016) MYB107 and MYB9 homologs regulate suberin deposition in angiosperms. Plant Cell 28: 2097–2116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee SJ, Park JH, Lee MH, Yu JH, Kim SY (2010) Isolation and functional characterization of CE1 binding proteins. BMC Plant Biol 10: 277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu R, Li H, Qin G, Zhang Z, Tian S (2017) Identification and functional characterization of a tonoplast dicarboxylate transporter in tomato. Front Plant Sci 8: 186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mi H, Muruganujan A, Casagrande JT, Thomas PD (2013) Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat Protoc 8: 1551–1566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nakagawa T, Kurose T, Hino T, Tanaka K, Kawamukai M, Niwa Y, Toyooka K, Matsuoka K, Jinbo T, Kimura T (2007) Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J Biosci Bioeng 104: 34–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakano T, Suzuki K, Fujimura T, Shinshi H (2006) Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol 140: 411–432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nakayasu D, Shioya N, Shikata M, Thagun C, Abdelkareem A, Okabe Y, Ariizumi T, Arimura G, Mizutani M, Ezura H, et al. (2018) JRE4 is a master transcriptional regulator of defense-related steroidal glycoalkaloids in tomato. Plant J 94: 975–990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Paul P, Singh SK, Patra B, Sui X, Pattanaik S, Yuan L (2017) A differentially regulated AP2/ERF transcription factor gene cluster acts downstream of a MAP kinase cascade to modulate terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. New Phytol 213: 1107–1123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pollier J, Moses T, González-Guzmán M, De Geyter N, Lippens S, Vanden Bossche R, Marhavý P, Kremer A, Morreel K, Guérin CJ, et al. (2013) The protein quality control system manages plant defence compound synthesis. Nature 504: 148–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shoji T (2018) Repeated recruitment of metabolic genes into regulons for specialized pathways in plants: The dawn of evo-meta biology. Kagaku to Seibutsu 56: 671–677 (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Shoji T, Hashimoto T (2015) Stress-induced expression of NICOTINE2-locus genes and their homologs encoding Ethylene Response Factor transcription factors in tobacco. Phytochemistry 113: 41–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shoji T, Kajikawa M, Hashimoto T (2010) Clustered transcription factors regulate nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Cell 22: 3390–3409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shoji T, Mishima M, Hashimoto T (2013) Divergent DNA-binding specificities of a group of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR transcription factors involved in plant defense. Plant Physiol 162: 977–990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thagun C, Imanishi S, Kudo T, Nakabayashi R, Ohyama K, Mori T, Kawamoto K, Nakamura Y, Katayama M, Nonaka S, et al. (2016) Jasmonate-responsive ERF transcription factors regulate steroidal glycoalkaloid biosynthesis in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol 57: 961–975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van der Fits L, Memelink J (2000) ORCA3, a jasmonate-responsive transcriptional regulator of plant primary and secondary metabolism. Science 289: 295–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vishwanath SJ, Delude C, Domergue F, Rowland O (2015) Suberin: Biosynthesis, regulation, and polymer assembly of a protective extracellular barrier. Plant Cell Rep 34: 573–586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Voinnet O, Rivas S, Mestre P, Baulcombe D (2003) An enhanced transient expression system in plants based on suppression of gene silencing by the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus. Plant J 33: 949–956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wasternack C, Hause B (2013) Jasmonates: Biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann Bot 111: 1021–1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Plant Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society for Plant Biotechnology

RESOURCES