Skip to main content
Nanomaterials logoLink to Nanomaterials
. 2019 May 7;9(5):712. doi: 10.3390/nano9050712

Dissolved Organic Matter Modulates Algal Oxidative Stress and Membrane System Responses to Binary Mixtures of Nano-Metal-Oxides (nCeO2, nMgO and nFe3O4) and Sulfadiazine

Fan Zhang 1, Nan Ye 1, Se Wang 1, Yue Meng 1, Hao Fang 1, Zhuang Wang 1,*, De-Gao Wang 2,*
PMCID: PMC6566580  PMID: 31067831

Abstract

Joint biomarker responses, oxidative stress and membrane systems, were determined for nano-metal-oxides (nMeO, i.e., nCeO2, nMgO, and nFe3O4) and sulfadiazine (SDZ) exposed at relevant low concentrations to two freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella pyrenoidosa. The impacts of dissolved organic matter (DOM) on the joint biomarker responses were also investigated. Results indicated that the presence of SDZ significantly decreased the level of intercellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the algal cells exposed to each nMeO. Reduction of cell membrane permeability (CMP) and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in the algal cells was observed when the algae were exposed to the mixture of SDZ and the nMeO. The degree of reduction of the ROS level, CMP, and MMP significantly went down with the addition of DOM to a certain extent. Changes in cellular oxidative stress and membrane function depended on the types of both nMeO and algal species. This contribution provides an insight into the hazard assessment of a mixture consisting of emerging contaminants and DOM, as they can coexist in the aquatic environment.

Keywords: nanoparticles, sulfadiazine, mixture toxicity, freshwater algae, dissolved organic matter

1. Introduction

Environmental contaminants in the form of mixtures commonly exist in field-relevant conditions [1,2]. In recent years, the interaction between emerging pollutants, such as engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) [3,4,5] and antibiotics [6,7], have drawn a lot of attention due to their potential ecological toxicity. Upon release or emission, ENPs may interact with antibiotics in the environment, potentially resulting in a co-exposure of organisms and the occurrence of mixture effects [8,9,10]. However, current knowledge about the combined effects of ENPs and antibiotics on ecological species is extremely limited.

Dissolved organic matter (DOM), a ubiquitous abiotic factor, has been demonstrated to play a vital role in the behavior and effect of ENPs in the aquatic environment [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Wang et al. [13] found that DOM alleviated the toxicity of nano-silver to aquatic organisms of different trophic levels. Zhang et al. [17] also observed that DOM reduced the toxicity of materials of the graphene family to freshwater microalgae. However, Ye et al. [18] found that DOM and nano-Al2O3 synergistically caused cellular responses in freshwater microalgae. Therefore, it is important to take into account the presence of DOM when co-exposure of ENPs and antibiotics is being studied.

nCeO2, nMgO, and nFe3O4 are versatile nano-metal-oxide (nMeO) ENPs that have been widely utilized in many fields [19,20,21]. The importance of evaluating the toxicity of nCeO2 [22,23] and nFe3O4 [24,25] to ecological species has received extensive attention, but aquatic toxicity data for nMgO are comparably rare. Sulfadiazine (SDZ) is a frequently detected antibiotic [26]. Understanding the fate and transport of sulfadiazine in the environment is imperative to its ecological and health risk assessment [27]. The overall objective of this work was to elucidate the impacts of DOM on the aquatic toxicity of the three nMeO and SDZ. Two commonly used freshwater algae species Scenedesmus obliquus [28,29] and Chlorella pyrenoidosa [30,31] were selected as model organisms. The physicochemical properties of the ENPs in single, binary, and ternary systems were characterized to evaluate their stability in the test medium. Biochemical assays were performed to determine the algal cellular oxidative stress and the membrane function responses, firstly by using one ENP and then mixtures, at relevant low concentrations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Materials, Test Medium, and Test Species

nCeO2 (primary size <50 nm), SDZ (purity 98%), and DOM (fulvic acid ≥90%) were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Co. (Shanghai, China). nMgO (primary size ca. 20 nm) and nFe3O4 (primary size 3–8 nm) were purchased from PlasmaChem GmbH (Berlin, Germany). Ye et al. [18] described the chemical structure of the DOM used in this work in a previous study. A total organic carbon analyzer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) was employed to determine the dissolved organic carbon content of the DOM stock solution. Stock suspensions (5 g/L) of the nMeO were freshly prepared in ultra-pure water and sonicated for 30 min in a temperature controlled (25 °C) KH-3200DE water-bath sonicator (Kunshan Hechuang Ultrasonic Instrument Co., Kunshan, China) operated at 150 W with 100% energy input. The stock solution of 0.1% v/v SDZ was prepared in analytical grade dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa were obtained from the Institute of Hydrobiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Wuhan, China) and aliquots were prepared in the algae medium [32]. The pH values of all the treatments were adjusted to 7.8 ± 0.2 prior to testing. For the physicochemical characterizations and toxicity tests, 1 mg/L of nMeO (representing a relevant low concentration [33,34]) or SDZ and 1 mgC/L of DOM was used.

2.2. Physicochemical Analysis

The particles in the algae medium were characterized by using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JOEL 2100f, JOEL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The suspensions of nMeO were characterized after being allowed to settle for 0 and 96 h under the same conditions used in the toxicity tests. A ZetaSizer (Nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) was applied to measure the zeta-potential (ZP) and the intensity averaged hydrodynamic diameter (DH) of the nMeO in the algae medium, based on the phase analysis light scattering techniques and dynamic light scattering, respectively. The concentration of the dissolved metal ions was measured using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (Optima 7000DV Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), where the detection limits estimated by calculating the standard deviation of the blank were 20, 20, and 2 µg/L for the elements Ce, Mg, and Fe, respectively. To obtain the ionic phase, the nMeO suspensions were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C using a D3024 high-speed micro-centrifuge (Scilogex, Rocky Hill, CT, USA), and then the supernatant was filtered using a 0.02 µm pore diameter syringe filter (Antop 25, Whatman).

2.3. Algae Growth, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Membrane Function Assays

Algal growth inhibition tests were conducted as described in our previous study [35]. Briefly, the test solutions were inoculated with 3 × 105 (S. obliquus) and 4 × 105 (C. pyrenoidosa) algal cells mL−1. The algae cells were examined under a microscope to check for culture density and normal morphology. The algae used for toxicity tests were maintained at 24 ± 1.0 °C with a photoperiod of 12 h of light (3000–4000 L) and 12 h of dark in climatic chambers, and were shaken manually three times a day. After 96 h (S. obliquus) and 72 h (C. pyrenoidosa), the algal cell density measure was used to calculate the specific growth rate (%).

To measure the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), the 96 h (S. obliquus) and 72 h (C. pyrenoidosa) incubated algal cell suspensions were centrifuged by using the D3024 high-speed micro-centrifuge for 10 min at 15,000 rpm and 4 °C. After discarding the supernatant, a fluorescent probe 2’,7’-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) at 10 μM was added to incubate with the algal cells for 30 min in the dark at 25 °C. Subsequently, the samples were washed three times with the algae medium. When intracellular ROS generate, the DCFH from the lipase decomposing of the DCFH-DA in the cells transforms into 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescein (DCF), the fluorescence intensity (FI) is then measured and it indicates the extent of the ROS generation.

Fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and the cationic fluorescent dye rhodamine 123 (Aladdin Industrial Co.) were employed as fluorescent probes to measure cell membrane permeability (CMP) and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), respectively. Briefly, 96 h (S. obliquus) and 72 h (C. pyrenoidosa) algal cell suspensions were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C and were incubated with 10 μM FDA or 10 μM rhodamine 123 in the dark at 25 °C for 30 min, followed by three washes with algae medium. The FI was measured by a fluorescence spectrophotometer (F96PRO, Shanghai Kingdak Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China) with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm.

All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistically significant differences were determined by the student’s t-test (significance level p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Characterizations

The TEM images show the morphology of the studied particles in the single and combined mixture systems in the algae medium (Figure 1). Analysis of the TEM images indicates that nCeO2 agglomerated intensely and formed irregular shapes. Moreover, nCeO2 showed greater tendency to agglomerate than the other two particles. nMgO in the single and combined systems were spherical particles with dispersion uniformity. Compared with nMgO in the single systems, the particles in the combined systems showed smaller size and increased density. nFe3O4 showed spherical structure and also agglomerated in the test medium. Furthermore, the presence of SDZ and DOM obviously alleviated the extent of agglomeration of nFe3O4. Wang et al. [36] also demonstrated that DOM promoted the suspension of nFe3O4 by hydrophobic interactions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

TEM images of the particles in the single and combined systems in the algae medium.

The changes in ZP and DH for nCeO2, nMgO, and nFe3O4 with time in the algae medium were measured and the results are shown in Figure 2. The ZP values of the three nMeO were found to be <0, indicating a negative surface charge upon the particles, which could mean that the nMeO particles were stabilized by a surface layer of anions from the test medium. It can be observed that the nMeO showed no obvious changes in the ZP when the particles were suspended in the presence of DMSO and SDZ. However, the ZP of the nMeO particles in the presence of DOM was more negative than when DOM was absent. Moreover, the ZP values of the DOM alone treatments were found to be −10.2 ± 0.8 (0 h) and −11.1 ± 0.8 (96 h), which were generally more positive than the ZP values of the ternary mixtures. This implies that the DOM effects can be explained by the interaction between DOM and the particles rather than the DOM only. The enhanced surface charges might induce adsorption of DOM onto the surface of the particles [11], suggesting that electrostatic repulsion may be the mechanism for dispersion stability. Note that the ZP values of nMgO + SDZ + DOM, nFe3O4, nFe3O4 + DMSO, and nFe3O4 + SDZ systems at 96 h were more positive than their corresponding ZP values at 0 h. This could mean that Mg2+- or Fe3+-ions released and could have neutralized the negative charges at the surface of the particles.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Zeta-potential (ZP) and hydrodynamic diameter (DH) of the particles in the single and combined systems in the algae medium (pH = 7.8). Data are means ± SD (n = 3).

It was also found that the presence of DMSO and SDZ had no obvious influence on the DH values of the nMeO particles (Figure 2). However, the DH values of the particles in the binary mixtures of nMeO and SDZ decreased to some extent in the presence of DOM. Furthermore, the DH values decreased when DOM was present in the order nCeO2 > nMgO > nFe3O4, regardless of the time of incubation. The results of the DH values were in agreement with the TEM analysis. The adsorbed DOM could act as a polyelectrolyte or surfactant and thus provide steric repulsion [37]. Together, these findings suggest that the nMeO particles were relatively stable in the single, binary, and ternary mixtures during the incubation.

In nanotoxicological testing, sonication time affecting the dissolution of nMeO particles should be considered [38,39]. In the present study, we investigated the dissolution amount of nMeO particles at the stock suspension concentrations before (0 min) and after 30 min sonication. As shown in Table 1, there was no significant difference in the dissolved fraction of nMeO between the treatments before and after sonication. This means that the concentration of dissolved metal species was stable during the sonication under this study. Pradhan et al. [38] also observed that increasing the sonication time had no effect on the fraction passing through the 20 nm filter for nCu. In addition, note that the dissolved fraction of nFe3O4 in the stock suspension before the sonication was 38.41%, implying that the dissolved fraction can influence the aquatic behavior and toxicity of nFe3O4.

Table 1.

Dissolved fraction of the nano-metal-oxide (nMeO) particles in the stock suspension concentrations before (0 min) and after 30 min sonication a.

nMeO Fraction (%)
0 min 30 min
nCeO2 0.02 ± 0.00 0.03 ± 0.01
nMgO 0.69 ± 0.04 0.81 ± 0.16
nFe3O4 38.41 ± 3.02 34.34 ± 2.75

a Data are means ± SD (n = 2).

3.2. Algal Growth Inhibition Toxicity

Figure 3 depicts the growth rate of S. obliquus after 96 h and C. pyrenoidosa after 72 h of incubation for all the treatments at the relevant low concentrations used. The treatments with DMSO and SDZ on their own had no significant inhibition effects on the growth of S. obliquus, while the treatments with DMSO and SDZ on their own had significant inhibition effects on the growth of C. pyrenoidosa. Moreover, the DOM alone treatment showed no obvious growth inhibition toxicity to the two algae.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Growth rates of S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa exposed to the treatments. The different letters for each species after exposure to the different treatments indicate the significant differences in growth rates, p < 0.05. Data are means ± SD (n = 3).

For nCeO2, the single, binary, and ternary mixtures had no significant inhibition effects on the growth of S. obliquus. The growth rate of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to the nCeO2 alone treatment was lower than the control, while the growth rates of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to the nCeO2 in the binary and ternary mixtures were higher than the control. The difference of sensitivity to nCeO2 might be species-dependent. Moreover, there is no significant difference between the binary and ternary mixtures. That is to say that the presence of SDZ decreased the growth inhibition toxicity of nCeO2 to C. pyrenoidosa. A previous study indicated the protective role of nCeO2 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Phaeodactylum tricornutum preventing the toxicity of antibiotic erythromycin [40].

For the single, binary, and ternary mixtures of nMgO, no significant inhibition of the algal growth rate was observed. Moreover, the dissolved fractions of nMgO (65 µg/L) showed no growth inhibition toxicity to the algae. Aruoja et al. [41] also reported the nontoxic effect of nMgO on a green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata with a median effect concentration >100 mg/L. For nFe3O4, the treatment with the particles alone inhibited the growth of the two algae, which was consistent with the study by Lei et al. [42] on the algal (C. pyrenoidosa) growth inhibition of the particles. Moreover, the dissolved fractions of nFe3O4 (13 µg/L) showed equivalent growth inhibition toxicity to C. pyrenoidosa, implying that the dissolved fractions of nFe3O4 might contribute to the toxicity to C. pyrenoidosa. Similar to nCeO2, the binary and ternary mixtures showed no growth inhibition toxicity to the two algae. Note that there is a significant difference between the growth inhibition rates of the binary and ternary mixtures to C. pyrenoidosa. This implies that DOM played an important role in modulating the growth of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to the binary mixtures of nFe3O4 and SDZ.

3.3. Algal Cellular Oxidative Stress Modulation

Figure 4 shows the relative levels of the ROS generated in the S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa cells exposed to the different treatments. Compared to the control, the DMSO and DOM alone showed no effect in the levels of ROS in the two algal cells, while the SDZ alone resulted in an observable decrease. It was observed that nFe3O4 induced a significant increase in the ROS levels of the two algae, which agrees with the results from Lei et al. [42], where iron-based ENP-induced oxidative stress was the main toxic mechanism to algal toxicity. The consistent trend indicated that the mixtures of SDZ and nMeO decreased the ROS levels, irrespective of the particle types. However, the degree of reduction was comparatively reduced with the addition of DOM. The dissolved fractions of nMgO and nFe3O4 showed no effects on the levels of ROS, which means that no toxicity or oxidative stress was induced by the dissolved ions. Leung et al. [43] also demonstrated the toxicity of nMgO towards Escherichia coli bacterial cells without ROS production for partial nMgO samples. We found that SDZ displayed a protective effect on the algal cells against oxidative stress induced by the particles. Furthermore, the interaction of the nMeO with co-exposed SDZ and DOM reduced the production of ROS. It is undeniable that there are several known limitations of using the fluorescence probe (DCFH-DA), including failure to detect a specific kind of ROS [44,45]. Further studies are needed to expand and confirm the definitive ROS using enzyme-based assays.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relative levels of reactive oxygen species in S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa exposed to the treatments. The different letters for each species after exposure to the different treatments indicate the significant differences in fluorescence intensity, p < 0.05. Data are means ± SD (n = 3).

3.4. Membrane Function Modulation

The stability of CMP and MMP is beneficial to maintain the normal physiological function of algal cells [46]. As shown in Figure 5, compared to the control, the DMSO showed no obvious effects on the CMP, while the SDZ alone significantly decreased the CMP of S. obliquus, and the DOM alone significantly increased the CMP of S. obliquus. The increase in CMP in the algal cells exposed to DOM indicates potential increased risks in the uptake of pollutants, while the decrease observed for the SDZ can be associated with the opposite effect.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Cellular membrane permeability of S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa exposed to the treatments. The different letters for each species after exposure to the different treatments indicate the significant differences in fluorescence intensity, p < 0.05. Data are means ± SD (n = 3).

For the nCeO2, the ternary mixtures remarkably decreased the CMP of S. obliquus compared to the individual particles and the binary mixtures, suggesting that the DOM in the ternary mixtures exhibited a distinct effect compared to the DOM alone. The nCeO2 alone increased the CMP of C. pyrenoidosa, while the binary and ternary mixtures significantly decreased the CMP of C. pyrenoidosa in comparison with the control and the alone treatment. Bellio et al. [47] also found that in Escherichia coli the outer membrane permeability coefficient increases in presence of nCeO2.

For nMgO, the binary mixtures significantly decreased the CMP of S. obliquus compared to the control, while the ternary mixtures exhibited no effects on S. obliquus. The binary and ternary mixtures containing the nMgO obviously decreased the CMP of C. pyrenoidosa compared with the alone treatment. Furthermore, the ternary mixtures contributed more to this decrease in the CMP of C. pyrenoidosa. This was similarly observed in the CMP of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to the systems containing nFe3O4. This indicates that DOM plays an important role in modulating the CMP in the algal cells exposed to nMeO. In the case of the nFe3O4 alone, the CMP increased more than the control. The dissolved fraction of nFe3O4 affected the CMP of S. obliquus less than the nFe3O4, implying that the nFe3O4 particles might contribute to the enhancement of the CMP of S. obliquus. However, there is no significant difference in the CMP of C. pyrenoidosa between the dissolved fraction of nFe3O4 and the nFe3O4 alone, suggesting that the dissolved fraction might contribute to the toxicity of the nFe3O4 to C. pyrenoidosa via disturbing the function of CMP.

As shown in Figure 6, compared to the control, a significant decrease in the MMP of S. obliquus cells was observed after 96 h of exposure to the SDZ alone, while the MMP of S. obliquus cells was increased by the presence of DOM alone. The changes of the MMP also indicated damage to the mitochondrial function. For the nCeO2, the alone treatment posed a completely different effect on the MMP of S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa. Moreover, the presence of DOM decreased the MMP of S. obliquus more than the single and binary mixtures of the nCeO2. The binary and ternary mixtures significantly decreased the MMP of C. pyrenoidosa in comparison with the individual nCeO2. Compared to the control, the nMgO only significantly increased the MMP of S. obliquus. Leung et al. [43] also demonstrated that the primary mechanism of the death of E. coli induced by nMgO was related to cell membrane damage. The binary and ternary mixtures with nMgO significantly decreased the MMP of the two algae compared to the nMgO alone, while the ternary mixtures had less of an effect on the MMP of S. obliquus than the binary mixtures. In addition, the dissolved ions shed from the nMgO showed no effect on the MMP. The degree of reduction of the MMP in the algal cells exposed to the nFe3O4 significantly went down with the addition of SDZ and DOM.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Mitochondrial membrane potential of S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa exposed to the treatments. The different letters for each species after exposure to the different treatments indicate the significant differences in fluorescence intensity, p < 0.05. Data are means ± SD (n = 3).

Similar to the results of CMP, there is no significant difference in the MMP of C. pyrenoidosa between the dissolved fraction of nFe3O4 and the nFe3O4 alone, suggesting that the dissolved fraction might contribute to the toxicity of the nFe3O4 to C. pyrenoidosa via disturbing the mitochondrial function. Compared with the single and binary mixtures, the MMP of C. pyrenoidosa decreased more when the DOM was present. This decrease in the MMP might be caused by the depolarization of the mitochondria in the algal cells exposed to the treatments. Together, it is reasonable to believe that changes in the membrane function could be a sensitive cellular indicator to indicate the toxicological effect of xenobiotics.

In the present study, DOM displayed different degrees of impact on the behavior of the three nMeO (nCeO2, nMgO, and nFe3O4) in the test medium, and modulated the cellular oxidative stress and membrane system responses of the two freshwater algae (S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa) to the nMeO when SDZ co-existed. The role of DOM was mainly associated with the types of nMeO and the species of algae. Furthermore, the mechanism of the effects of DOM on the algal cellular responses to the binary mixtures may be associated with their binding with mixture components [48,49]. It is likely that the complexation of DOM to SDZ or the dissolved fraction of the nMeO made them less bioavailable, and the adsorption of DOM upon the nMeO limited the interactions of particles with the algal cells.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the presence of SDZ significantly decreased the level of intercellular ROS in S. obliquus and C. pyrenoidosa induced by the three nMeO. SDZ decreased CMP and MMP levels of S. obliquus exposed to the nMeO to some extent. Furthermore, the degree of reduction of ROS, CMP, and MMP significantly went down with the addition of DOM. The results we presented here confirmed that SDZ and DOM helped protect against oxidative stress responses in the algal cells exposed to nMeO, and interrupted the algal cell membrane functions. Our findings demonstrated that DOM played an important role and should not be omitted when evaluating the combined risk of ENPs and antibiotics.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for helping to improve the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Z.W. conceived and designed the biological experiments and co-wrote the paper; D.-G.W. discussed and co-wrote the paper; F.Z. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and co-wrote the paper. N.Y., S.W., Y.M. and H.F. contributed in general discussion and experimental assistance.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 41601519 and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province, grant number KYCX18_1029.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Ge H.L., Liu S.S., Zhu X.W., Liu H.L., Wang L.J. Predicting hormetic effects of ionic liquid mixtures on luciferase activity using the concentration addition model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45:1623–1629. doi: 10.1021/es1018948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hernández A.F., Gil F., Lacasaña M. Toxicological interactions of pesticide mixtures: An update. Arch. Toxicol. 2017;91:3211–3223. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Middepogu A., Hou J., Gao X., Lin D. Effect and mechanism of TiO2 nanoparticles on the photosynthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018;161:497–506. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hou J., Wu Y., Li X., Wei B., Li S., Wang X. Toxic effects of different types of zinc oxide nanoparticles on algae, plants, invertebrates, vertebrates and microorganisms. Chemosphere. 2018;193:852–860. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vijver M.G., Zhai Y., Wang Z., Peijnenburg W.J.G.M. Emerging investigator series: The dynamics of particle size distributions need to be accounted for in bioavailability modelling of nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2018;5:2473–2481. doi: 10.1039/C8EN00572A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Välitalo P., Kruglova A., Mikola A., Vahala R. Toxicological impacts of antibiotics on aquatic micro-organisms: A mini-review. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2017;220:558–569. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ribeiro A.R., Sures B., Schmidt T.C. Ecotoxicity of the two veterinarian antibiotics ceftiofur and cefapirin before and after photo-transformation. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;619–620:866–873. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Iswarya V., Sharma V., Chandrasekaran N., Mukherjee A. Impact of tetracycline on the toxic effects of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles towards the freshwater algal species, Scenedesmus obliquus. Aquat. Toxicol. 2017;193:168–177. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Naasz S., Altenburger R., Kühnel D. Environmental mixtures of nanomaterials and chemicals: The Trojan-horse phenomenon and its relevance for ecotoxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;635:1170–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhao L., Ji Y., Sun P., Li R., Xiang F., Wang H., Ruiz-Martinez J., Yan Y. Effects of individual and complex ciprofloxacin, fullerene C60, and ZnO nanoparticles on sludge digestion: Methane production, metabolism, and microbial community. Bioresour. Technol. 2018;267:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Quik J.T., Lynch I., Van Hoecke K., Miermans C.J., De Schamphelaere K.A., Janssen C.R., Dawson K.A., Cohen Stuart M.A.C., Van De Meent D. Effect of natural organic matter on cerium dioxide nanoparticles settling in model fresh water. Chemosphere. 2010;81:711–715. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Peijnenburg W.J.G.M., Baalousha M., Chen J., Chaudry Q., Von Der Kammer F., Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Lead J., Nickel C., Quik J.T.K., Renker M., et al. A review of the properties and processes determining the fate of engineered nanomaterials in the aquatic environment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;45:2084–2134. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2015.1010430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Z., Quik J.T.K., Song L., Van Den Brandhof E.J., Wouterse M., Peijnenburg W.J.G.M. Humic substances alleviate the aquatic toxicity of polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated silver nanoparticles to organisms of different trophic levels. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2015;34:1239–1245. doi: 10.1002/etc.2936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Deng R., Lin D., Zhu L., Majumdar S., White J.C., Gardea-Torresdey J.L., Xing B. Nanoparticle interactions with co-existing contaminants: Joint toxicity, bioaccumulation and risk. Nanotoxicology. 2017;11:591–612. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1343404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shang E., Li Y., Niu J., Zhou Y., Wang T., Crittenden J.C. Relative importance of humic and fulvic acid on ROS generation, dissolution, and toxicity of sulfide nanoparticles. Water Res. 2017;124:595–604. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baalousha M., Afshinnia K., Guo L. Natural organic matter composition determines the molecular nature of silver nanomaterial-NOM corona. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2018;5:868–881. doi: 10.1039/C8EN00018B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang Y., Meng T., Guo X., Yang R., Si X., Zhou J. Humic acid alleviates the ecotoxicity of graphene-family materials on the freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus. Chemosphere. 2018;197:749–758. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ye N., Wang Z., Wang S., Fang H., Wang D. Dissolved organic matter and aluminum oxide nanoparticles synergistically cause cellular responses in freshwater microalgae. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A. 2018;53:651–658. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2018.1438814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miao L., Wang P., Wang C., Hou J., Yao Y., Liu J., Lv B., Yang Y., You G., Xu Y., et al. Effect of TiO2 and CeO2 nanoparticles on the metabolic activity of surficial sediment microbial communities based on oxygen microelectrodes and high-throughput sequencing. Water Res. 2018;129:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ma B., Yu N., Han Y., Gao M., Wang S., Li S., Guo L., She Z., Zhao Y., Jin C., et al. Effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on microbial diversity and removal performance of sequencing batch reactor. J. Environ. Manag. 2018;222:475–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mashjoor S., Yousefzadi M., Zolgharnain H., Kamrani E., Alishahi M. Organic and inorganic nano-Fe3O4: Alga Ulva flexuosa-based synthesis, antimicrobial effects and acute toxicity to briny water rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis. Environ. Pollut. 2018;237:50–64. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abdolahpur Monikh F., Chupani L., Zusková E., Peters R., Vancová M., Vijver M.G., Porcal P., Peijnenburg W.J.G.M. Method for extraction and quantification of metal-based nanoparticles in biological media: Number-based biodistribution and bioconcentration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:946–953. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hawthorne J., De la Torre Roche R., Xing B., Newman L.A., Ma X., Majumdar S., Gardea-Torresdey J., White J.C. Particle-size dependent accumulation and trophic transfer of cerium oxide through a terrestrial food chain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:13102–13109. doi: 10.1021/es503792f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fajardo C., Costa G., Nande M., Martín C., Martín M., Sánchez-Fortún S. Heavy metals immobilization capability of two iron-based nanoparticles (nZVI and Fe3O4): Soil and freshwater bioassays to assess ecotoxicological impact. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;656:421–432. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhu S., Xue M.Y., Luo F., Chen W.C., Zhu B., Wang G.X. Developmental toxicity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on cysts and three larval stages of Artemia salina. Environ. Pollut. 2017;230:683–691. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bayen S., Yi X., Segovia E., Zhou Z., Kelly B.C. Analysis of selected antibiotics in surface freshwater and seawater using direct injection in liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014;1338:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang J.F., Yang L.M., Ying G.G., Liu C.B., Zheng L.Y., Luo S.L. Reaction of antibiotic sulfadiazine with manganese dioxide in aqueous phase: Kinetics, pathways and toxicity assessment. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A. 2017;52:135–143. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2016.1237138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu H., Zhang X., Chen C., Du S., Dong Y. Effects of imidazolium chloride ionic liquids and their toxicity to Scenedesmus obliquus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015;122:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xiong J.Q., Kurade M.B., Jeon B.H. Ecotoxicological effects of enrofloxacin and its removal by monoculture of microalgal species and their consortium. Environ. Pollut. 2017;226:486–493. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tang Y., Xin H., Yang F., Long X. A historical review and bibliometric analysis of nanoparticles toxicity on algae. J. Nanopart. Res. 2018;20:92. doi: 10.1007/s11051-018-4196-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao J., Dai Y., Wang Z., Ren W., Wei Y., Cao X., Xing B. Toxicity of GO to freshwater algae in the presence of Al2O3 particles with different morphologies: Importance of heteroaggregation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52:13448–13456. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.OECD . Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test., Nr. 201, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); Paris, France: 2011. [(accessed on 25 March 2019)]. Available online: http://www.oecd.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bhuvaneshwari M., Iswarya V., Archanaa S., Madhu G.M., Kumar G.K.S., Nagarajan R., Chandrasekaran N., Mukherjee A. Cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs towards fresh water algae Scenedesmus obliquus at low exposure concentrations in UV-C, visible and dark conditions. Aquat. Toxicol. 2015;162:29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Iswarya V., Bhuvaneshwari M., Alex S.A., Iyer S., Chaudhuri G., Chandrasekaran P.T., Bhalerao G.M., Chakravarty S., Raichur A.M., Chandrasekaran N., et al. Combined toxicity of two crystalline phases (anatase and rutile) of Titania nanoparticles towards freshwater microalgae: Chlorella sp. Aquat. Toxicol. 2015;161:154–69. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang S., Wang Z., Chen M., Fang H., Wang D. Co-exposure of freshwater microalgae to tetrabromobisphenol A and sulfadiazine: Oxidative stress biomarker responses and joint toxicity prediction. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2017;99:438–444. doi: 10.1007/s00128-017-2153-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang H., Zhao X., Han X., Tang Z., Song F., Zhang S., Zhu Y., Guo W., He Z., Guo Q., et al. Colloidal stability of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles differentially impacted by dissolved organic matter and cations in synthetic and naturally-occurred environmental waters. Environ. Pollut. 2018;241:912–921. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baalousha M., Manciulea A., Cumberland S., Kendall K., Lead J.R. Aggregation and surface properties of iron oxide nanoparticles: Influence of pH and natural organic matter. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008;27:1875–1882. doi: 10.1897/07-559.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pradhan S., Hedberg J., Blomberg E., Wold S., Odnevall Wallinder I. Effect of sonication on particle dispersion, administered dose and metal release of non-functionalized, non-inert metal nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016;18:285. doi: 10.1007/s11051-016-3597-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shin Y.J., Lee W.M., Kwak J.I., An Y.J. Dissolution of zinc oxide nanoparticles in exposure media of algae, daphnia, and fish embryos for nanotoxicological testing. Chem. Ecol. 2018;34:229–240. doi: 10.1080/02757540.2017.1405943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sendra M., Moreno-Garrido I., Blasco J., Araújo C.V.M. Effect of erythromycin and modulating effect of CeO2 NPs on the toxicity exerted by the antibiotic on the microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Environ. Pollut. 2018;242:357–366. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aruoja V., Pokhrel S., Sihtmäe M., Mortimer M., Mädler L., Kahru A. Toxicity of 12 metal-based nanoparticles to algae, bacteria and protozoa. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2015;2:630–644. doi: 10.1039/C5EN00057B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lei C., Zhang L., Yang K., Zhu L., Lin D. Toxicity of iron-based nanoparticles to green algae: Effects of particle size, crystal phase, oxidation state and environmental aging. Environ. Pollut. 2016;218:505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leung Y.H., Ng A.M.C., Xu X., Shen Z., Gethings L.A., Wong M.T., Chan C.M.N., Guo M.Y., Ng Y.H., Djurišić A.B., et al. Mechanisms of antibacterial activity of MgO: Non-ROS mediated toxicity of MgO nanoparticles towards Escherichia coli. Small. 2014;10:1171–1183. doi: 10.1002/smll.201302434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pavelescu L.A. On reactive oxygen species measurement in living systems. J. Med. Life. 2015;8:38–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wardman P. Fluorescent and luminescent probes for measurement of oxidative and nitrosative species in cells and tissues: Progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007;43:995–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu W., Chen S., Quan X., Jin Y.H. Toxic effect of serial perfluorosulfonic and perfluorocarboxylic acids on the membrane system of a freshwater alga measured by flow cytometry. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008;27:1597–1604. doi: 10.1897/07-459.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bellio P., Luzi C., Mancini A., Cracchiolo S., Passacantando M., Di Pietro L., Perilli M., Amicosante G., Santucci S., Celenza G. Cerium oxide nanoparticles as potential antibiotic adjuvant. Effects of CeO2 nanoparticles on bacterial outer membrane permeability. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2018;1860:2428–2435. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Quigg A., Chin W.C., Chen C.S., Zhang S., Jiang Y., Miao A.J., Schwehr K.A., Xu C., Santschi P.H. Direct and indirect toxic effects of engineered nanoparticles on algae: Role of natural organic matter. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013;1:686–702. doi: 10.1021/sc400103x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang Z., Zhang L., Zhao J., Xing B. Environmental processes and toxicity of metallic nanoparticles in aquatic systems as affected by natural organic matter. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2016;3:240–255. doi: 10.1039/C5EN00230C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nanomaterials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES