Abstract
In recent years, mounting scientific evidence has emerged regarding the evaluation of the putative correlation between the gut microbiota composition and the presence of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and arterial hypertension. The aim of this narrative review is to examine the current literature with respect to the relationship between intestinal dysbiosis and the insurgence/progression of chronic NCDs, analyzing the physiopathological mechanisms that can induce microbiota modification in the course of these pathologies, and the possible effect induced by microbiota alteration upon disease onset. Therapy based on probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplant can represent a useful therapeutic tool, as has been highlighted on animal studies. To this moment, clinical studies that intended to demonstrate the beneficial effect induced by this kind of oral supplementation on the gut microbiota composition, and subsequent amelioration of signs and symptoms of chronic NCDs have been conducted on limited sample populations for a limited follow-up period. Therefore, to fully evaluate the therapeutic value of this kind of intervention, it would be ideal to design ample population; randomized clinical trials with a lengthy follow up period.
Keywords: chronic non-communicable diseases, gut microbiota, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, dysbiosis
1. Introduction
The human microbiota is a complex collection of microorganisms that colonizes the human body at the cutaneous, oral, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tract. The estimated weight of the microbiota is about 1.5 kg, and it mainly includes bacteria, but also viruses, fungi, protozoa, and archaea. In the gut, there are about one trillion bacteria (a value ten times higher respect to the number of human cells), comprising from 500 to 1000 species [1].
Even if historically the ratio between bacterial and human (B/H) cells was hypothesized to be 10:1, this has been recently criticized [2]. A study has proposed that in reality the B/H ratio is of 1:1. Such data has been deduced from the re-evaluation of the number of cells and bacteria in the human body by using new DNA analysis techniques, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to correctly estimate the weight of each organ, and through the revision of scientific literature pertinent to this subject [3].
The “microbiome”, meaning the genome of the microbiota combined with its environmental interactions [4], includes more than 3 million genes and is 150 times the size of the human genome. The complexity and interest in the microbiota led to the foundation in 2008 of the “MHP—Microbiome Human Project”, which was aimed to identify, characterize, and classify the microorganisms of the human microbiota [5].
The human microbiota plays a key role in the immune system maturation, metabolism of lipids, glucose, and bile acids, and in the defense against pathogens through the competition for space and nutrients, by activating the host immune system and by “priming” immune cells [6].
This extended microbial community can be considered as a highly dynamic organ, which is sensitive to environmental insults and modifies its composition over the host’s lifespan. Its structure and activity are influenced by multiple factors that make it a unique system, which varies from individual to individual, Figure 1 [7].
Figure 1.
Mechanisms influencing the composition of the gut microbiota. NCDs, chronic non-communicable diseases.
In the realm of the microbiota a “core” has been identified, represented by a series of taxa constantly present in healthy subjects and absent in pathologic subjects, suggesting that the absence of such taxa may characterize dysbiosis [8]. However, successive studies have reconsidered this hypothesis because of a certain degree of taxonomic variation between heathy individuals [8,9].
A new hypothesis has identified a “healthy functional core”, which can be described as a complex of metabolic and molecular functions carried out by the microbiota but not necessarily linked to the same microorganisms in different individuals [10].
The mode of delivery influences the neonatal composition of the gut microbiota. Neonates born vaginally have microbes similar to those located in the vaginal maternal microbiota. Whilst those delivered by caesarean section have a typically cutaneous microbiota, consisting mainly of Staphylococcus and Propionibacterium spp. [11] and microbes from the hospital environment [12].
In infants, particularly during the first year of life, delivery mode has been hypothesized to affect immunological functions and gut microbiota composition. Newborns delivered by caesarean section have a reduced number of bacterial cells counts in fecal samples and a large number of antibody-secreting cells [13]. Feeding type modality in infants is an ulterior factor in microbiota modulation. Some studies have shown there is a difference in the gut microbiota composition between breast fed infants and formula fed infants [14,15]. The latter, present altered bacterial abundance particularly skewed towards the family of the Peptostreptococcaceae that contains Clostridium difficile, which is commonly associated with gastrointestinal and autoimmune pathologies.
Numerous studies have shown how breast-feeding is correlated to a reduced risk of developing chronic degenerative pathologies such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity, and chronic inflammatory intestinal pathologies. Moreover, breast-feeding confers protection towards respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, and allergies [16,17].
Dietary habits, which are closely related to geographical factors, ethnicity, and food culture represent an important element for the constitution and function of the gut microbiota [18]. With regards to ethnicity, a study by Deschasaux et al. [19] conducted on 2084 healthy subjects, all resident in Amsterdam but belonging to six distinct ethnic groups, has shown that even if all the subjects lived in the same city, they still presented varying gut microbiota composition, which could be attributed to their different ethnicities. Therefore, the observed differences, characterized by varied alpha-diversity and interindividual variations, are independent of metabolic health and are partly explained by characteristics linked to ethnicity such as alimentary habits, life style, and socio-demographic factors [20].
A study by De Filippo et al. [21] compared the fecal microbiota of European Union (EU) children to that of children from the rural African village of Burkina Faso (BF). The BF children diet is characterized by high intake of fiber. BF children showed a significant increase in Bacteroidetes and reduction in Firmicutes, with an exclusive bacterial richness from the genus Prevotella and Xylanibacter, which can hydrolyze cellulose and xylan, completely absent in EU children. This suggests that the gut microbiota is influenced by polysaccharide-rich dietary content of BF children, allowing them to maximize energy intake from fiber-based diet [21].
Bacterial metabolites differ from those generated by enzymatic processes in humans, as bacterial reactions occur under anaerobic conditions and are constituted mainly by reductive or hydrolysis reactions. Studies conducted on the metabolism of polyphenols in the gut microbiota have allowed the understanding of functions performed by these compounds, and their possible health effects in humans [22,23,24]. Nowadays, the literature has highlighted the possible metabolic pathways of polyphenols by intestinal bacteria and examined their diet related metabolism [25]. In the pathophysiological mechanism of many pathological conditions, the alteration of the gut microbiota plays an essential role. In fact, the balance between the host’s immune system and the gut microbiota composition is fundamental in the maintenance of a healthy status [26].
Amongst foods able to influence gut microbiota composition, polyphenols deriving from red wine have particular importance [27,28]. Whereby, their daily consumption for only four weeks significantly enhanced the number of Enterococcus, Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Bifidobacterium genera and Bacteroides uniformis, Eggerthella lenta, Blautia coccoides, and Eubacterium rectale species [22].
Recent studies have also shown that resveratrol can positively modulate gut microbiota composition, ameliorating glucose tolerance in a murine model of obesity [28,29,30].
It is therefore, deduced that diet plays a fundamental role in modulating the composition of the gut microbiota, becoming an active part in some disease pathogenesis.
Although the association between the onset of metabolic pathologies and the alteration of the Firmicutes to Bacteroides (F/B) ratio relationship remains uncertain, recent studies have highlighted a correlation between the presence of Akkermansia and Lactobacillus genera with central obesity and fasting hyperglycemia [31,32].
Polyphenols, oligo-, and polysaccharides seem to be able to favor the growth of beneficial bacteria and inhibit that of pathogenic species [22,33,34].
The health effects of polyphenols, depends on their bioavailability. Amongst polyphenols, minor polar compounds from extra virgin olive oil, in particular hydroxytyrosol (HT), play a pivotal role in modulating the gut microbiota composition [35]. Since the concentration of HT in the body is reduced, it is hypothesized that HT may have direct effects on the gastrointestinal system, before its absorption. Therefore, the bioavailability and the beneficial effects of polyphenols on the host are related to their transformation by specific pathways via esterase, glucosidase, demethylation, and decarboxylation activities in gut microbiota [36].
Age is another factor that influences the composition of the human microbiota. At birth, the variability of the microbiota is lower because the diet is solely comprised of the mother’s milk. With time and the introduction of an ample variety of foods, the human microbiota adapts by varying and increasing its bacterial composition in order to metabolize as many foods as possible [37].
Literature evidence shows that a variety of age-related conditions such as physical frailty, and pathologies such as C. difficile colitis, vulvovaginal atrophy, colorectal carcinoma, and cardiovascular (CV) disease can be linked to microbiota alterations. As a future prospect, microbiota manipulation in elders could be an innovative therapeutic strategy to counteract the evolution/progression of age-related comorbidities [38].
The effect of antibiotics on the human microbiota composition is the most studied drug type interaction. Antibiotic therapies are not only effective against pathogenic microorganisms but also against the host associated microbial communities in the gut, and act by reducing the variability of the intestinal microbiota. Löfmark et al. [39] showed that even short-term antibiotic administration (one week of clindamycin) could cause long-term alterations in the commensal microbiota of healthy subjects, detectable up to two years after antibiotic administration.
Physical activity is another important factor that influences the composition and the function of the gut microbiota, by having a beneficial impact on it. A study by Clarke et al. [40], conducted on professional rugby players, demonstrated that physical exercise increases the alpha-diversity (expression of the number of species present in relation to their relative abundance and correlated to the health status of the subject) of gut microorganisms, which is significantly correlated with creatine kinase (CK) plasmatic levels and protein intake. This study strengthens the hypothesis that physical activity has a positive influence on the microbiota composition, by having an impact on its alpha-diversity [5,41]. In the same study, the authors demonstrated that athletes with lower body mass index (BMI) had significantly higher abundance of the species Akkermansia muciniphila. The latter is a gram-negative bacterium, which is able to degrade mucin and its presence is inversely correlated with obesity and metabolic disorders in mice and humans [42,43]. A. muciniphila carries out a beneficial function on the human organism because it is involved in increasing the thickness of the intestinal mucosa, bettering its tropism and protective function against pathogens [44].
Moreover, by degrading mucin it provides energetic substrates to other commensal species present in the gastrointestinal lumen [45].
The gut microbiota composition is usually characterized by bacterial members of the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla [46]. However, an important range of variation in the taxa present in the gut and interindividual variability in microbial composition has been observed, it has been supposed that the gut microbiota of most individuals can belong to one of three possible variants or “enterotypes” based on the dominant genera (Bacteroides, Prevotella, or Ruminococcus) [47]. These variants may in fact be more appropriately characterized as a ratio of the relative abundance of Bacteroides and Prevotella, with the Ruminococcus enterotype comprised into the Bacteroides group [48].
In reality, from latest studies, it has emerged that the most correct term to describe the gut microbiota composition is not via the characterization of the dominant enterotype, but rather via the evaluation of the concentration gradient of different microbial species along the gastro-intestinal tract [49,50].
Quantitative and qualitative alteration of the gut microbiota composition is termed “dysbiosis”. In recent years the correlation between altered microbiome and pathologies, including different systems of the human organism, ranging from the gastrointestinal tract to the genitourinary tract up to the central nervous system, have received increasing interest [51].
Dysbiosis has been associated with the onset of many inflammatory, non-inflammatory, and infectious diseases such as the inflammatory bowel disease, the metabolic syndrome, cancer, autoimmune conditions, and C. difficile infection [52].
In this review, we analyze the current literature on the correlation between the composition of human microbiota and the onset and progression of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs), specifically: chronic kidney disease (CKD), DM, and arterial hypertension (HTN), evaluating both animal and human studies. Biomedical studies are largely based on murine models, since the anatomy and the physiology are quite similar to that of humans. This is particularly true for the gastrointestinal apparatus; however, it must be noted that there are also some differences correlated to different diet, body composition and metabolic requirements [53].
Regarding microbiota composition, the two major phyla are common to both humans and rats (Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes) [54,55,56].
However, on a more detailed analysis of the taxonomic classification of the gut microbiota, about 85% of bacteria genera present in the rat cannot be found in humans [50].
Murine models appear as useful tool to comprehend mechanisms that correlate microbiota related pathologies, and allow scientist to perform research that would not conductible in humans, even if the results obtained are not always translatable because of species specific variations.
2. Methods
Current literature covering the impact of gut microbiota on onset of NCDs is analyzed and contextualized in this review. Specifically, research has been conducted on Medline (Pubmed) and Scopus. Such research examines studies published until January 2019 utilizing the words: “microbiota”, “gut microbiota” alone or in combination with “kidney”, “CKD”, “diabetes”, “hypertension”, “prebiotic”, “probiotic”, “synbiotic”, “postbiotic”, “fecal transplant”.
3. Gut Microbiota and Chronic Kidney Disease
Already in the 60s, a study conducted by Einheber et al. [57] demonstrated how the survival of germ-free nephrectomized mice was superior to conventionally raised nephrectomized mice. This pioneering study paved the way for further studies on the microbiota-kidney axis. Amongst the most recent studies conducted on humans one of particular interest Aranov et al. [58], which showed how colectomized hemodialysis (HD) patients have lower plasma levels of uremic toxins compared to HD patients with an intact colon, these data suggest the close relationship between the production of uremic toxins and gut microbiota.
Over the years, several studies have been conducted to characterize the gut microbiota. The first studies [5] were based on classic microbiological culturing techniques, whilst, recently, advances have been made thanks to the sequencing of either total DNA or 16S ribosomal RNA-genes. Uremia is a condition able to alter the gut microbiota composition, leading to dysbiosis. In CKD, there is a subversion of the normal intestinal balance resulting in a prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia spp., Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp.), Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcaceae, and a reduction of Bifidobacteriaceae (Bifidobacterium spp.), Lactobacillaceae (Lactobacillus spp.), Bacteroidaceae, and Prevotellaceae [59]. In CKD there is an increase in bacteria with proteolytic activity, responsible for the production of uremic toxins (such as indoles, phenols, and trimethylamine), amines with biological activity (such as histamine, tyramine) and hydrogen compounds (such as hydrogen sulfide, methane). Additionally, there is a decrease in bacteria with saccharolytic activity responsible for the production of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), water, CO2, and alcohols [60].
SCFAs introduced in the organism mainly through a fiber rich diet, perform various functions involved in the maintenance of eubiosis (a condition of equilibrium, characterized by a positive gut microbiota status) including tropism, being the main source of energy for the colonocytes, and the modulation of the gut immune system [61]. Moreover, SCFAs regulate the immunomodulatory activities of intestinal macrophages, the most abundant immune cell type in the lamina propria.
Previous studies [62] demonstrated how patients affected by intestinal chronic inflammatory diseases cause a reduction of bacteria able to produce SCFAs. The oral administration of SCAFs (n-butyrate) in rats highlighted their modulatory action in the immune response of macrophages in the lamina propria. Through the inhibition of histone deacetylase, an enzyme involved in the production of inflammatory cytokines such interleukin (IL) 6, and IL-12 suggests that the reduction of saccharolytic bacteria, and consequently of SCFAs, could exacerbate the chronic inflammatory status present in patients with CKD [63,64].
Amongst the different uremic toxins produced by proteolytic bacteria in dysbiosis of CKD patients, the most studied are: trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), indoxyl sulfate (IS), and p-cresyl sulphate (PCS). TMAO derives from the metabolism of choline and carnitine in the intestinal tract and the following hepatic oxidation. Its increment is inversely correlated to a reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) [65,66,67]. Studies conducted on animal models and on humans [68,69] have demonstrated that TMAO increases CV risk and promotes atherosclerosis. However, the specific mechanism of action in which TMAO induces atherosclerosis has yet to be elucidated. It is hypothesized that TMAO acts as a uremic toxin deriving from the intestine, which contributes to the chronic inflammatory state typical of chronic renal disease. In patients with moderate-severe CKD, TMAO represents an independent predictor of CV mortality [68,69], and its levels are directly proportional to inflammatory biomarkers (such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and IL-6). Moreover, it is worth highlighting that TMAO levels tend to reduce and normalize [67] in patients who have undergone a renal transplant.
Sun et al. [70] observed on murine models that TMAO appears to be responsible for kidney interstitial tubular fibrosis and renal dysfunction. Moreover, enhanced TMAO levels are present in the high-fat diet (HFD) induced obese mouse model. The authors also highlighted that in the HFD mouse, renal interstitial fibrosis, and phosphorylation of SMAD3 (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3, acts as a regulator of cell proliferation and differentiation, its phosphorylation plays a key role in renal fibrosis) are significantly increased with respects to the values observed in mice fed a low-fat diet (LFD). SMAD3 is a member of the SMAD protein family. In HFD mouse, the authors also observed a significant increase in the levels of biomarkers of kidney dysfunction, oxidative stress, and proinflammatory cytokines compared to LFD mice, specifically: kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and plasma cystatin C (CysC), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase-4, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-1 β. The confirmation of TMAO’s detrimental role in renal pathology was proven by concomitant treatment with the trimethylamine inhibitor 3,3-dimethyl-1-butanol (DMB). DMB reduced TMAO plasma concentration, and prevented the morphological and molecular changes, which were highlighted in HFD mice.
IS derives from the metabolism of tryptophan by bacterial tryptophanase and subsequent conjugation with a sulfate group in the liver. This uremic toxin may be related to oxidative stress elicitation and to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [71], which in turn lead to the creation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), that play a key role in the progression of CKD and in the onset of its complications. The administration of IS in uremic rats showed that the overload of this protein metabolite on residual nephrons is involved in the enhancement of bioactivity of transforming growth factor (TGF) β-1 in the kidneys. In turn, the increase of TGF β-1 increases the renal expression of metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (TIMP1) and pro-alpha 1 collagen, leading to the worsening of glomerular sclerosis and the decline of renal function [72]. IS can be considered as a powerful predictor of overall mortality, and CV events [73], having an indirect relationship with renal function and a direct relationship with aortic calcification and pulse wave velocity (a marker of arterial stiffness) in CKD patients.
PCS derives from intestinal proteolytic fermentation of tyrosine and phenylalanine, and from the following conjugation with a sulfate group in the liver. Administration of PCS caused significant renal tubular damage in 3/4 nephrectomized rats, by enhancing oxidative stress [74]. The renal toxicity of PCS seems to be caused by its intracellular accumulation, leading to both amplified NADPH oxidase activity and ROS production, which, in turn, triggers the production of inflammatory cytokines and TGFβ-1 secretion involved in renal fibrosis. This mechanism is similar to that for the renal toxicity of IS. Both PCS and IS plasma levels are related to an increased risk of CV events and death in HD patients [75].
Mounting evidence from these studies [76] shows that dysbiotic gut microbiota, characterized by uremic toxins (such as TMAO, IS, and PCS) produced by proteolytic bacteria, should be considered one of the pathogenic factors associated with a greater risk of kidney disease progression.
Some food components may have a direct toxic action, for example, phosphates and oxalates become toxic when they accumulate during CKD. While other nutrients can be processed by the gut microbiota, directly producing uremic toxins or their precursors that are, in turn, metabolized into toxins. Higher intake of these nutrients may change the gut microbiota composition, increasing the number of bacteria that process them and causing uremic toxin production [76].
Circulating levels of nutrient-derived uremic toxins are related to an increased risk of CKD progression. These findings pave the way for future therapeutic approaches, particularly through the modification of the intestinal gut microbiota composition, in order to impact directly on the production of uremic toxins [77].
4. Microbiota and Diabetes Mellitus
DM is a metabolic disorder characterized by chronic hyperglycemia, which causes organ damage in the retina, kidney, nervous system and CV system [78]. Diabetic patients are in a state of low-grade chronic inflammation [79,80,81]. Over the years, evidence has been collected on the involvement of dysbiosis in the occurrence of insulin resistance and in the development of a chronic inflammatory process.
An interesting study [82] relates the alteration and increment in bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) plasma concentration with dietary modification. Normally LPS plasma levels vary in a consistent manner with the circadian cycle, however, it was shown that the administration of an HFD could cause a disruptive effect on this relationship. After only four weeks, an increase in circulating LPS was demonstrated. The authors have termed this condition “metabolic endotoxemia” and have observed that it is involved in driving the expression of inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6. Moreover, the role of LPS and metabolic endotoxemia in insulin resistance has been explored by inducing a suppressive mutation of CD14, an important LPS receptor. The CD14 suppressed mice showed hypersensitivity to insulin, leading to the inference that the interaction between LPS and its receptor regulates insulin sensitivity.
It has been; therefore, hypothesized that metabolic endotoxemia regulates both the glyco-metabolic state and chronic inflammation [83]. Consequently, reducing plasma LPS concentration could be a potential therapeutic weapon for the glyco-metabolic control in the DM patients [79].
Combined administration of norfloxacin and ampicillin in ob/ob mice (genetically modified obese mouse model, lacking the satiety hormone “leptin”) [84], greatly reduced the number of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria in the cecum. After two weeks of antibiotic combination, the authors observed a reduction in fasting glycemia and oral glucose tolerance of ob/ob diet-induced obese and insulin-resistant mice. Moreover, a decrease of liver triglycerides (TG), plasma LPS and an increase adiponectin was observed [85]. Therefore, the modulation of the microbiota through antibiotics could ameliorate glucose tolerance and the inflammatory process.
Interestingly, some bacteria can have a protective role against the onset of metabolic diseases. For example, the abundance of A. muciniphila is decreased in obese and type 2 diabetic mice, and is normalized by prebiotic feeding with oligofructose [86].
A. muciniphila treatment reverted HFD induced metabolic disorders, as well as fat-mass gain, metabolic endotoxemia (lowering serum LPS levels and mRNA expression of CD11c, biomarker of adipose tissue differentiation), adipose tissue inflammation, and insulin resistance in diet-induced obese mice. In addition, A. muciniphila administration re-established gut barrier function and enhanced gut endocannabinoid content (acylglycerols), which control inflammation and glucose homeostasis [43].
As demonstrated in animals, LPS levels are increased in humans affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. LPS activates toll-like receptors (TLRs), which in turn induce inflammation and enhance the production of potentially diabetogenic pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by the adipose tissue, such as IL-6 and TNF-α. Furthermore, the administration of antidiabetic therapy (rosiglitazone) is responsible for the decline of the LPS and fasting serum insulin levels in previously untreated T2DM patients [87]. An interesting study has demonstrated that levels of bacteremia are correlated with the development of T2DM; in fact, the 16S rDNA concentration (a specific bacterial marker) was higher in those subjects destined to have diabetes in comparison to those who do not have a predisposition to develop the disease [88]. 16s rDNA ribosomal sequencing is a universal, rapid and accurate technology which is useful in order to identify bacteria present in examined samples. Particularly, it is advantageous in cases of uncultivable, slow growing, rare, or unusual bacteria. It may constitute a diagnostic technique in case of infections with a negative culture [89]. Zhang et al. [90] sequenced the microbial 16S rRNA genes of fecal samples of three different subgroups divided according to their glucose intolerance status (normal tolerance, prediabetes and T2DM individuals). This study showed that every progressive stage of the development of diabetes is related to a specific change in the composition of the gut microbiota. Glucose tolerance decreases along with the presence of butyrate producing bacteria such as A. muciniphila and Fecalibacterium prausnitzii and is also associated with a decrease of Verrucomicrobiae. The abundance of Streptococcus continued to decrease together with the glucose tolerance increase. These results suggest that the composition of gut microbiota could be potential marker for a high risk of DM, and the conservation of gut microbiota homeostasis in the prediabetes stage may be a strategy to delay the development of the pathology [90].
Qin et al. [91] developed a protocol termed “metagenome-wide association study” (MGWAS) based on the sequencing of the gut microbial DNA from 345 Chinese individuals, to compare the genetic content of the fecal microbiota between healthy and diabetic subjects. They identified and validated about 60,000 T2DM associated gene-sequence, showing that patients with T2DM were identifiable by a moderate grade of gut dysbiosis, more specifically by a reduction in the abundance of some butyrate-producing bacteria and a raise in opportunistic pathogens, an improvement of other microbial activities inducing sulfate reduction and oxidative stress resistance. These biomarkers could be useful for the classification of T2DM patients.
Subsequently, Karlsson et al. [92] developed a mathematical model to characterize the fecal metagenome of a cohort of European women with normal, impaired, and diabetic glucose control. Then they selected a possible metagenomic profile to accurately characterize individuals with T2DM. Interestingly, they applied their model to the previously cited Chinese cohort [91] and showed that the metagenomic markers for T2DM are different in the two cohorts examined (European and Chinese), suggesting that metagenomic predictive tools for T2DM should be defined according to age and place of origin of the individuals.
5. Microbiota and Arterial Hypertension
HTN is one of the most prevalent CV diseases worldwide and scientific evidence from both human and animal studies suggest that a number of factors (such as dietary habits, physical activity, pregnancy, and use of antibiotics), are closely related to HTN onset through their effect on the gut microbiota [93].
Tao Yang et al. [94] conducted a multi-step study on fecal samples containing bacterial DNA found in a spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) model, comparing it to that of Wistar Kyoto normotensive rats. Subsequently, they compared fecal samples from a cohort of patients with essential hypertension (EH), to a healthy subject control group. Finally, they analyzed the samples from chronic angiotensin II infusion rats (model in which hypertension is induced pharmaceutically) comparing them to the SHR. The results showed that, in the spontaneously hypertensive rats, a significant reduction in microbial abundance, diversity, and uniformity, together with an increased F/B ratio and a diminished abundance of acetate and butyrate producing bacteria were observed. The alterations observed in the SHR were comparable to the changes found in the chronic angiotensin II infusion rats, confirming that dysbiosis was independent from the mode of HTN insurgence. The EH patient cohort presented a similar dysbiotic pattern to the hypertensive rats. Successively, in order to evaluate if the eventual restoration of the F/B ratio could induce a positive effect on the blood pressure (BP), the authors administered a minocycline-based therapy to the chronic angiotensin II infusion rats. Such procedure highlighted a slight improvement of BP values as a consequence of the restored F/B.
A study by Adnan et al. [95] showed that the transplantation of SHR microbiota in normotensive rats induced an increase of systolic BP and dysbiosis by increasing the F/B ratio, confirming that the F/B ratio alteration is associated to the surfacing of systemic pathologies such as HTN.
The sequencing of 16S rRNA genes from fecal samples of Dahl salt-sensitive rats (S) [96], a genetic model of HTN, and Dahl salt-resistant rats (R), a genetic model of normotension, showed significant differences between S and R groups in gut microbiota composition. In particular, the authors observed that Bacteroidetes, particularly the S24-7 family, and the Veillonellaceae family of the Firmicutes phylum, were significantly higher in the S rats respect to the R rats. This confirms the pivotal role played by the F/B alteration in the development and maintenance of EH.
Pluznick et al. [97] reported that SCFA (specifically propionate) administration in mice produces hypotension because of the disruption of the olfactory receptor 78 (Olfr78, a receptor expressed in the juxtaglomerular afferent arteriole that mediates renin secretion in response to the production of SCFA) and the expression of G protein receptor 41 (Gpr41, a regulator of the smooth muscle cells of small resistance vessels). In addition, antibiotic therapy in the Olfr78 knockout mice reduces the gut microbiota biomass and increases BP, suggesting that SCFAs produced by the gut microbiota might modulate the BP via Olfr78 and Gpr41 activity. Therefore, accumulating evidence from these studies suggests that changes in the composition of gut microbiota plays a fundamental role in the induction and furthering the progression of HTN.
Research conducted in China [98] examined the composition and function of gut microbiota by 16s metagenomic sequencing in 196 participants, grouped in healthy control, pre-HTN (pHTN), and HTN patients. Compared to the healthy controls, the study confirmed a dramatically decreased microbial richness and diversity in both pHTN and HTN groups. Moreover, Prevotella dominated the gut enterotype of pHTN and HTN groups, which showed distinct metagenomic composition characterized by reduced bacterial species associated with a healthy phenotype, and a concomitant overgrowth of bacteria such as Klebsiella.
The microbiome characteristic in pHTN group and HTN group were similar. In addition, the fecal transplantation from hypertensive human donors to germ-free (GF) mice caused an elevation in BP, suggesting that HTN could be transferrable through the gut microbiota.
Overall, gut microbiota can contribute to the pathogenesis of HTN, and the first signs of dysbiosis can be found in the pHTN phase, suggesting that early intervention in this stage could be a future strategy to control this pathology.
Nowadays, the gut microbiota modulation appears as a useful tool in the prevention and care of dysbiosis associated with CKD, DM, and HTN. It may be modulated through the administration of antibiotics, prebiotics, and probiotics, or by fecal transplantation. The following sections will focus on the interest of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic approaches in the management of these diseases.
6. Probiotics
The Food Agricultural Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) has defined probiotics as “live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit to the host” in agreement with the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) [99].
Probiotics are able to change the microorganism population of the gut microbiota and control the correct functioning of this ecosystem. The potential of probiotic strains has recently motivated researchers to study the production of foods with probiotic activity.
The importance of probiotic foods, such as yogurt and other fermented milks, was already recognized since the beginning of the 20th century (Table 1).
Table 1.
Probiotics effects on CKD, DM and HTN.
| Author | Year | Study Population | Type of the Study | Primary Outcome | p Value for Primary End-Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natarajan R [100] | 2014 | 22 HD patients | RDBPC | Reduction in: | |
| WBC count | p < 0.057 | ||||
| CRP serum level | p < 0.071 | ||||
| Total IG level | p < 0.078 | ||||
| Miranda Alatriste PV [101] | 2014 | 30 stage III–IV CKD patients | RCT | Decrease in the serum urea level | p = 0.031 |
| Miraghajani M [102] | 2017 | 48 DKD patients | RCT | Decrease in: | |
| Oxidized GSH | p = 0.03 | ||||
| Increase in: | |||||
| GSH | p = 0.01 | ||||
| GSH peroxidase | p = 0.001 | ||||
| GSH reductase | p = 0.02 | ||||
| Borges NA [103] | 2018 | 46 HD patients | RDBPC | Increase in: | |
| Serum urea | p = 0.2 | ||||
| Potassium | p = 0.2 | ||||
| IS | p = 0.2 | ||||
| Decrease in: | |||||
| Fecal pH | p = 0.1 | ||||
| Yadav H [104] | 2006 | 39 high fructose-induced T2DM fed rats | RCT | Improvement of glycemic and lipid profile (blood glucose, HbA1c, glucose intolerance, plasma insulin, liver glycogen, PTC, TG, LDL, VLDL HDL, and FFA) | p < 0.05 |
| Yadav H [105] | 2007 | 18 high fructose-induced T2DM fed rats | RCT | Improvement of glycemic and lipid profile (blood glucose, HbA1c, glucose intolerance, plasma insulin, liver glycogen, PTC, TAG, LDL, VLDL, and FFA) and oxidative stress markers (GSH, TBARS) |
p < 0.05 |
| Khalili L [106] | 2019 | 40 T2DM patients | RCT | Increase in SIRT1 | p = 0.04 |
| Decrease in: | |||||
| Fet1 | p = 0.023 | ||||
| FBG | p = 0.013 | ||||
| HbA1c | p = 0.07 | ||||
| Insulin | p = 0.028 | ||||
| HOMA.IR | p = 0.007 | ||||
| Firouzi S [107] | 2015 | 136 T2DM patients | RDBPC | Decrease in the serum urea level | p < 0.05 |
| Kijmanawat A [108] | 2019 | 57 Pregnant women with diet-controlled gestational DM | RDBPC | Decrease in: | |
| FBG | p = 0.034 | ||||
| Fasting plasma insulin | p = 0.001 | ||||
| HOMA.IR | p = 0.001 | ||||
| Tanida M [109] | 2005 | Urethane-anesthetized rats | RCT | Decrease in: | |
| RSNA | p = 0.0005 | ||||
| BP | p = 0.0005 | ||||
| Increase in: | |||||
| GVNA | p = 0.0005 | ||||
| Gomez-Guzman M [110] | 2015 | 40 spontaneously hypertensive rats | RCT | Decrease in: | |
| Systolic BP | p < 0.01 | ||||
| Increase in the relaxation induced by acetylcholine Increase in: |
|||||
| eNOS activity | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Phosphorylation of eNOS and cardiac and renal hypertrophy |
p < 0.05 | ||||
| Ahrén IL [111] | 2015 | 54 induced hypertensive rats | RCT | Decrease in BP | p < 0.05 |
| Tuomilehto J [112] | 2004 | 60 patients with mild HTN | RCT | Decrease in: | |
| Systolic BP | p = 0.0668 | ||||
| Diastolic BP | p = 0.92 | ||||
| Jauhiainen T [113] | 2005 | 94 hypertensive patients | RDBPC | Decrease in: | |
| Systolic BP | p = 0.01 | ||||
| Diastolic BP | p = 0.48 | ||||
| Aoyagi Y [114] | 2017 | 352 normotensive patients | RCT | Decrease of the risk of developing HTN | p = 0.037 |
BP, blood pressure; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; DKD, diabetic kidney disease; eNOS, nitric oxide synthase; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FetA: fetuin A; FFA: free fatty acid; GSH, glutathione; GVNA, gastric vagal nerve activity; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HD, hemodialysis; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; HTN, arterial hypertension; IG, indoxyl glucuronide; IS, indoxyl sulfate; LDL, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; PTC, plasma total cholesterol; RCT, randomized control trial; RDBPC, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled; RSNA, renal sympathetic nerve activity; SIRT1: Sirtuin1; T2DM, diabetes mellitus type 2; TAG, triacylglycerol; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive species; TG, triglycerides; VLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; WBC, white blood cell.
In fact, in 1907, Nobel Laureate Elie Metchnikoffn [115] suggested the value of probiotics, observing that Bulgarian peasants lived longer lives because of their yogurt consumption.
Most probiotic products today are developed with Bifidobacteria, Lactobacilli, and other lactic acid producing bacteria, such as Lactococci and Streptococci. Other probiotic strains that could induce beneficial effects on health status include the bacterial genera Bacillus, Escherichia, and Propionibacterium and some other yeast genera, mainly Saccharomyces. Probiotics are generally considered safe for human health with reduced adverse effects [116]. Several species and strains of Lactobacilli, including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus helveticus, have been extensively studied in the prevention of NCDs. We are going to discuss the role of probiotics in CKD, DM, and HTN.
6.1. Probiotics and CKD
Several studies have been conducted in order to quantify the efficacy of probiotics. Not only in relation to their capacity to decrease the concentration of uremic toxins and to better renal function indices, but also in the role they play in order to reduce the systemic inflammatory status present in CKD patients. However, these studies have elucidated some discrepancies, which will be discussed in the following paragraph.
Wang et al. [117] showed that supplementation of probiotics containing Bifidobacterium bifidum A218, Bifidobacterium catenulatum A302, Bifidobacterium longum A101, and Lactobacillus plantarum A87 in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients significantly reduced the serum levels of endotoxins and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-5), together with increasing the serum levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10), and preserving residual renal function. It has been demonstrated that inflammatory cytokines (particularly IL-6 and TNF-α) are increased in dialysis patients and are correlated to increased CV events and overall mortality [118,119]; whilst endotoxins are both cause and markers of CKD related inflammation [120]. For such reason probiotics could be a valid instrument for improving CKD related prognosis.
The beneficial effect of probiotics on intestinal health has been known for centuries. For this reason, they have been studied in the management of end stage renal disease both in animal models and humans. In recent years, [121] these effects have been related to the progression of CKD, highlighting their anti-inflammatory, re-equilibrating action to restore eubiosis, and their antioxidant properties, reducing the ROS production by the gut microbiota.
Animal studies [122] have demonstrated that the gut microbiota can influence the concentration of uremic toxins, and the administration of probiotic “cocktails” can increase life expectancy in uremic rats, by reducing levels of urea nitrogen. Similar formulations of probiotics have been administered to CKD patients, stage III–IV, and according to the Kidney-Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K-DOQI) guidelines [100], they induced a statistically significant reduction in urea nitrogen levels [123].
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of strain-specific probiotic formulation with Streptococcus thermophilus (KB19), L. acidophilus (KB27), and B. longum (KB31) (Renadyl) [124] in HD patients has highlighted a series of beneficial effects elicited by Renadyl, as shown in Table 1. Most notable is Renadyl’s action on IS (also confirmed in animal models), because it has been shown how IS reduces erythropoietin (EPO) production in vitro [125,126]. Therefore, this uremic toxic has been proposed to be involved in the insurgence of anemia during CKD by inhibiting the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF), which in turn is responsible for the activation of EPO [127]. It is postulated that particular probiotic formulations (such as Renadyl) could be useful to contrast normochromic and normocytic anemia typical of CKD. This could represent a new combinatorial therapy, which would allow the reduction of weekly EPO dosage eliciting both therapeutic and pharmaco-economic advantages.
Moreover, in this study, no statistically significant changes were observed in measures of Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) [101,124]. This data demonstrated that Renadyl administration in uremic patients is well tolerated and safe [128].
Miranda Alatriste et al. [102,129] observed that administration of substantial quantity of probiotic agents (L. casei shirota 8 × 109 UFC vs. 16 × 109) leads to a greater decrease (>10%) in blood urea levels in patients with stages III–IV of CKD according to K-DOQI guidelines [100]. This study demonstrates that not only the probiotic typology, but also the administered quantity influences the efficacy of the treatment. Ulterior RCTs are necessary to investigate the adequate dosage for nephropathic patients.
Miraghajani et al. [130] researched the effect of probiotic soy milk consumption on oxidative stress factors among type 2 DKD. DKD pathogenesis is conditioned by a plethora of factors, one of which is the oxido-reductive equilibrium [131]. It has been demonstrated that in T2DM patients there is a significant reduction in the plasmatic ratio between GSH/GSSH [132] and ROS hyper-production (both factors are involved in producing renal damage [133] and in the insurgence of precocious complications related to diabetes). In fact, various studies convene that increased oxidative stress in DM patients is closely correlated to the precocious insurgence of complications [103,134]. The results, as shown in Table 1, suggests that soy milk supplementation may help in the achievement of an improved antioxidant status in DKD patients, reducing risk factors correlated to its development.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on HD patients investigated the effects of probiotic supplementation for a three-month period (S. thermophilus, L. acidophilus, and B. longum), this study highlighted discrepant result regarding the uremic profile and the gut microbiota of these patients. On one hand, there was a reduction in the fecal pH of the HD patients, a positive sign indicating an improvement in the gut microbiota flora composition. In fact, according to some studies probiotics increase bacterial production of organic acids and reduce pH in the colic lumen, thus inhibiting pathogenic growth [135,136]. On the other hand; however, rather than achieving normalization of uremic toxins, a significant increase in serum urea, potassium, and IS was observed. The trial showed that probiotic intervention did not seem to induce a positive effect on the inflammatory status and biochemical parameters in HD patients, cautioning health professionals on the administration of probiotics in these subjects.
In order to elucidate the real benefice induced by probiotics on uremic patients, given that the studies conducted to this date are all on limited samples and produced discording results, it would be necessary to carry out RCTs on a larger population and the effects should be availed by a lengthier follow-up period.
6.2. Probiotics and Diabetes
There is increasing evidence that oral administration of probiotics could reduce serum glucose levels and ameliorate the metabolic and inflammatory status of DM patients [104,137].
The consumption of skim milk and dahi, a traditional Indian fermented milk (containing Lactobacillus lactis ssp. lactis, L. lactis ssp. cremoris, L. lactis ssp. diacetylactis, and Lactobacillus citrovorum), was shown to ameliorate glycemic and lipid profile in high fructose fed (HFF) rats, as reported in Table 1 [105,106]. The authors hypothesized that some of the results could depend on the capacity of fermented to modify gut bacterial content. There is an increase in bacteria that produce SCFAs, which reduce plasmatic cholesterol. Moreover, there is an increase in bacteria involved in the de-conjugation of biliary acids. Biliary acids in this form cannot be reabsorbed by the intestinal mucosa, so their de novo synthesis increases, with consequent cholesterol consumption leading to its secondary reduction. It would be useful to test the effects of this probiotic on the lipid and glycemic profile on T2DM patients in order to assert its therapeutic potential.
A second study by same authors [107], investigated the effect of L. acidophilus and L. casei containing dahi on HFF rats. The authors propose that this kind of probiotic supplementation has a truly beneficial effect on the specimens. The study compared glycemic and lipid profiles of the HFF rats supplemented with dahi to an HFF control group after eight weeks, confirming the positive effect on such profiles, and highlighting its antioxidant effect (Table 1). In such regards, the antioxidant action of probiotics at the hepatic and pancreatic level has been proposed, as it was shown that dahi supplementation inhibited thiobarbituric acid reactive species elevation as well as decreasing reduced GSH. In conclusion, the administration of probiotics contained in dahi has induced, in animal models, multiple beneficial effects improving not only the glycemic profile, but also the lipid one and reducing oxidative stress.
A randomized controlled trial on diabetic patients [138] demonstrated that the administration of L. casei decreased parameters for related with glycemic metabolism (Table 1). Moreover, this study revealed a new role for L. casei supplementation in the glucose homeostasis. This probiotic significantly increased sirtuin1 (SIRT1) plasmatic concentration NAD-dependent deacetylase, which participates in the improvement of insulin sensitivity, its increment has a positive effect on the glycemic profile of the patients. At the same time, a decrease fetuin A (FetA) plasma concentration was observed. FetA is a serum protein, which inhibits the insulin receptor autophosphorylation and decreases efficiency of insulin signaling. The compounded increment of SIRT1 and reduction of FetA could significantly improve the glycemic status of DM patients. Therefore, the administration of this probiotics could be used as an association therapy finalized to ameliorate the glyco-metabolic status of patients.
A study by Firouzi et al. [139] demonstrated that administration of probiotics in patients with T2DM decreases urea plasma levels but does not significantly change other renal function parameters (creatinine and eGFR) and electrolytes (plasma levels of sodium, potassium), suggesting the necessity to perform further studies, regarding the role of probiotics in DM and its associated complications. It was hypothesized that uremic subjects, being characterized by dysbiosis, presented higher levels of aerobic bacteria (Escherichia coli) and lower levels of anaerobic bacteria (Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium). Increased concentration of E. coli induced higher urea production, and an increase of intestinal pH. Therefore, the administration of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium could induce a pH reduction, and prevent the proliferation of aerobic bacteria [108,140].
Kijmanawat A et al. [141] showed that four weeks of probiotic supplement administration, containing B. bifidum and L. acidophilus, in women with diet-controlled gestational DM, in the late second and early third trimester, ameliorate the glycemic profile (Table 1). This evidence suggests that probiotic supplements may be considered as an adjunct treatment for glycemic control in gestational diabetes, protective for both the mother and the newborn as the intrauterine environment can influence the long-term metabolic health of the offspring.
6.3. Probiotics and Hypertension
The beneficial effects of probiotics on BP have been reviewed in recent years [109,142]. The literature states that some lactic acid bacteria, such as Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 (LJLa1), have a hypotensive action in rats [143]. A Japanese group [143] proposed that the hypotensive action of LJLa1 itself or its metabolites may be due to the regulation of the autonomic nervous system. In order to test this, LJLa1 intraduodenal injections were administered to urethane-anaesthetized rats. It was reported that these injections reduced renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), reduced BP, and increased gastric vagal nerve activity (GVNA). Such study highlights how probiotics, in this case L. johnsonii La1, can have an antihypertensive effect through the modulation of the microbiota, reduction of pathogenic species, and a direct effect on the systems involved in regulating of arterial pressure. In recent years, the correlation between HTN and RSNA hyperactivation has received considerable attention [144]. Some experimental trials have been pursued in order to evaluate the efficacy of selective sympathectomy in HTN resistant to pharmacotherapy [110,145]. The use of probiotics; however, could represent a non-invasive, side effect free, preventative therapy.
Gómez-Guzmán et al. [146] produced a study, which claims to have demonstrated for the first time the positive effect of long-term oral supplementation of probiotics to alter the HTN profile in rats, by improving endothelial function, decreasing vascular inflammation and oxidative stress, and by reducing BP. Rats were either administered Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 (LC40) or Lactobacillus coryniformis CECT5711 (K8) plus Lactobacillus gasseri CECT5714 (LC9). Both formulae managed to restore the impaired capacity of the aortic endothelium to relax in response to acetylcholine, a vasodilator with NO-agonist activity. This probiotic treatment also acts through the restoration of eubiosis and bacterial ratio, inducing a change in the cecum microbiota, with higher counts of the Lactobacillus spp. cluster, and lower counts of Bacteriodes spp. and Clostridium spp. Moreover, when administered to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), they decreased both NADPH oxidase activity, leading to a reduction of the aortic superoxide production, and TLR4. The latter is a factor of the innate immune system involved in system inflammation; in recent years, its putative role in the pathogenesis of HTN has emerged. Animal studies have shown how angiotensin II acts through the activation of TLR4 pathways; however, the precise mechanism has yet to be elucidated [111,147]. This study shows that probiotics represent a possible therapeutic tool for the treatment of genetic HTN.
Ahrén et al. [148] demonstrated that the supplementation of L. plantarum DSM 15,313 fermented blueberries significantly reduced systolic and diastolic BP, by controlling the NO dependent pathway in a hypertensive rat model treated with nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME—a hypertensive drug). The beneficial effect of L. plantarum is enhanced by products the fermentation of blueberries, which are phenolic acids (hydrox-yphenyllactic acid, 3,4-dixydroxyphenyl-propionic acid and phenyllactic acid), which hold anti-hypertensive properties [112].
Fermented milk can be considered as functional drink acting against HTN. In recent years the capacity of probiotics to reduce BP was related to the release of bioactive peptides during the fermentation process, such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides, having a hypotensive function similar to that of ACE-inhibitor drugs. Two tripeptides that inhibit ACE, isoleucyl–prolyl–proline (Ile-Pro-Pro) and valyl–prolyl–proline (Val-Pro-Pro), have been isolated from sour milk fermented with L. helveticus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae bacteria [113].
A study of Tuomilheto et al. [149] demonstrated that the administration of this product, containing the ACE inhibitory peptides in patients with mild hypertension, could have a slight BP lowering effect.
A randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled parallel group study [114] on hypertensive patients confirmed that administration of L. helveticus LBK-16H fermented milk containing bioactive peptides, consumed on a daily basis, had a BP lowering effect. Particularly, systolic pressure resulted reduced by −7.6 mmHg. This information is significant, as some controlled trials have demonstrated how anti-hypertensive pharmaceuticals reduce stroke risk by 1/6 with a systolic arterial pressure reduction of 5 mmHg [150].
These two studies show how probiotics (in a similar way to pharmaceuticals) act on some of the systems involved in HTN pathogenesis. For such reason, they should be considered as a possible therapeutic tool for such pathology.
Aoyagi et al. [151] have highlighted that the risk of developing HTN is significantly lower in elderly subject who take fermented milk products containing L. casei strain Shirota (LcS) at least three times per week. L. casei owes its anti-hypertensive properties to its polysaccharide component (SG1–polysaccharide–glycopeptide complex), which increases prostaglandin I2 biosynthesis, and reduces peripheral vascular resistance [152]. The results of Aoyagi’s study indicated that Lactobacilli could also have a protective action in the development of hypertension, as well as having a BP lowering effect.
In conclusion, probiotic intervention may be a potentially effective approach in the co-treatment of HTN through the restoration of the gut microbiota.
7. Prebiotics
Gibson and Roberfroid devised the prebiotic concept in 1995 [153], defining prebiotics as “a non-digestible food ingredient that beneficially affects the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one or a limited number of bacteria in the colon, and thus improves host health”. Although this original definition has been revised several times, the main features have been maintained [154]. In 2008, FAO defined prebiotics as a “nonviable food component that confers a health benefit on the host associated with modulation of the microbiota” [155].
Prebiotics are functional food components, found naturally either in plant-based foods or from synthetic production through the enzymatic conversion of sugars. These food compounds are usually carbohydrate structures or soluble dietary fibers, which are selectively metabolized by human microbes [156].
Oligosaccharides like inulin-type fructans and galactooligosaccharides represent the best-known fibers in class of functional fibers and their prebiotic effects have been explored. In particular, it has been observed that these oligosaccharides are able to stimulate the growth of Bifidobacteria and to a lesser extent of Lactobacilli [156].
The modulation of gut microbiota via the administration of prebiotics has been studied throughout the years as a potential instrument against the development and worsening of various diseases, including CKD, DM, and HTN (Table 2).
Table 2.
Prebiotics effects on CKD, DM and HTN.
| Reference | Year | Study Population | Type of the Study | Primary Outcome | p Value for Primary End-Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younes H [157] | 2006 | 9 CKD patients | Single-blinded prospective randomized trial | Increase in: | |
| Urea nitrogen excretion in stool | p < 0.01 | ||||
| Decrease in: | |||||
| Urinary nitrogen excretion | p < 0.01 | ||||
| Plasma urea | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Ramos CI [158] | 2018 | 50 non-diabetic non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients | RDBPC | Decrease in: | |
| Serum total PCS | p = 0.07 | ||||
| Serum free PCS | p = 0.07 | ||||
| Meijers BKI [159] | 2010 | 22 HD patients | Single center, non-randomized, open-label phase I/II study | Decrease in: | |
| PCS generation rates | p = 0.007 | ||||
| PCS serum concentrations | p = 0.03 | ||||
| Sirich TM [160] | 2014 | 56 HD patients | Single-blinded prospective randomized trial | Decrease in: | |
| Serum free IS | p = 0.04 | ||||
| Serum free PCS | ns | ||||
| Poesen R [161] | 2016 | 40 CKD patients with eGFR between 15 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 | Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study | No significant decrease of serum uremic toxins level or 24h urinary excretion | ns |
| Everard A [162] | 2011 | 10 ob/ob mice | RCT | Improvement of plasma glucose profile |
p < 0.05 |
| Increase in: | |||||
| White adipose tissue weight |
p < 0.05 | ||||
| Leptin sensitivity | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Proglucagon mRNA expression | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Enteroendocrine cell activity |
p < 0.05 | ||||
| Dehghan P [163] | 2014 | 52 women with T2DM | RCT | Decrease in: | |
| BMI | p < 0.05 | ||||
| FBG | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Hb1Ac | p < 0.05 | ||||
| IL-6 | p < 0.05 | ||||
| TNF-α | p < 0.05 | ||||
| LPS | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Bodinham CL [164] | 2014 | 17 T2DM patients | RCT | Decrease in: | p = 0.045 |
| Postprandial glucose concentrations | |||||
| NEFA | p = 0.04 | ||||
| Fasting GLP1 | p = 0.049 | ||||
| Increase in: | |||||
| Glucose uptake across the forearm muscle | p = 0.077 | ||||
| Postprandial GLP1 excursions | p = 0.009 | ||||
| Aliasgharzadeh A [165] | 2015 | 75 T2DM patients | RCT | Decrease in: | p < 0.05 |
| FBI | p < 0.05 | ||||
| HOMA-IR | p < 0.05 | ||||
| QUICKI | p < 0.05 | ||||
| TNF-α | p < 0.05 | ||||
| IL-6 | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Endotoxin | p < 0.05 | ||||
| MDA | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Marques FZ [166] | 2017 | 64 hypertensive mice | RCT | Increase in: | |
| Acetate-producing bacteria | p = 0.0001 | ||||
| Bacteroides acidifaciens species bacteria | p = 0.0001 | ||||
| Decrease in: | |||||
| F:B ratio | p = 0.0001 | ||||
| Systolic BP | p = 0.0002 | ||||
| Diastolic BP | p = 0.0001 | ||||
| Glomerular fibrosis | p = 0.0001 | ||||
| Tubulointerstitial fibrosis | p = 0.008 | ||||
| Cardiac perivascular and interstitial fibrosis | p = 0.001 | ||||
| Left ventricular hypertrophy | p < 0.05 | ||||
| Xiao S [167] | 2014 | 123 obese patients | Self-controlled clinical trial | Decrease in: | |
| Bifidobacteriaceae bacteria | p = 0.05 | ||||
| Systolic BP | p = 0.01 | ||||
| Diastolic BP | p = 0.05 | ||||
| Body weight | p = 0.01 | ||||
| BMI | p = 0.01 | ||||
| FBI | p = 0.01 | ||||
| FBG | p = 0.01 | ||||
| HOMA-IR | p = 0.01 | ||||
| HbA1c | p = 0.01 | ||||
| TG | p = 0.01 | ||||
| PTC | p = 0.01 | ||||
| LDL | p = 0.05 | ||||
| TNF-α | p = 0.05 | ||||
| IL-6 | p = 0.01 | ||||
| CRP | p = 0.05 | ||||
| Increase in: HDL |
p = 0.05 | ||||
| Rault- Nania MH [168] | 2008 | 40 high fructose-fed rats | RCT | Prevention of: | |
| BP elevation | p = 0.028 | ||||
| Hypertriglyceridemia | p = 0.036 | ||||
| Susceptibility to heart peroxidation | p = 0.0001 | ||||
| Hsu CN [169] | 2018 | 8 male adult offspring born to high fructose-fed mothers | RCT | Decrease in: | |
| BP | p < 0.05 |
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; F:B ratio, Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FBI, fasting blood insulin; FFA: free fatty acid; GLP1, Glucagon-like peptide-1; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HD, hemodialysis; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; IG, indoxyl glucuronide; IL-6, interleukin-6; IS, indoxyl sulfate; LDL, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acid; PCS, p-Cresyl sulfate; PTC, plasma total cholesterol; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; RCT, randomized control trial; RDBPC, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled; T2DM, diabetes mellitus type 2; TG, triglycerides; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α. VLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol.
7.1. Prebiotics and CKD
Prebiotics represent a valid therapeutic alternative in the modulation of the gut microbiota composition, by reducing the producing of microbial-derived uremic toxins, such as TMAO, IS, and PCS.
Most dietary approaches finalized to treat CKD and to achieve alleviation of symptoms are based on daily protein consumption restriction [157,158,170,171].
Younes et al. study the role of fermentable carbohydrate supplementation as an alternative dietary attempt, in order to lower urea plasma levels [172]. The administration of fermentable carbohydrate significantly benefits the status of hematic toxicity present in the treated subjects, as reported in Table 2. These results suggest that the use of prebiotics produces similar beneficial effects in chronic renal failure as those obtained with a low-protein diet. Moreover, such supplementation induces an increase in body weight (around 600 g in five weeks). Such result is of particular clinical relevance, as the use of fermented carbohydrates in association with a targeted dietetic-nutritional intervention, is able to reduce uremic toxin levels and contrast the insurgence of malnutrition (frequent comorbidity in nephropathic patients). Therefore, it would be advisable to perform a study on a higher number of this kind of patients in conservative therapy to confirm the efficacy of such combined intervention on the disease progression and on bodily composition.
Ramos et al. [159] investigated the effect of administering prebiotic fructooligosaccharide (FOS) on uremic toxins of CKD patients undergoing conservative therapy. The results showed a reduction of total serum and free PCS whilst no changes in urinary PCS, serum IS, and indole 3-acetic acid (IAA) were recorded. The latter is a uremic toxin responsible for endothelial dysfunction, triggering inflammation and oxidative stress, and it could be considered as an independent predictor of mortality and CV events in CKD patients. The observed clinical effect following FOS administration resulted dependent on the glomerular filtrate and the dietetic fiber/protein ratio [160]. Validating the possible therapeutic efficacy of FOS in nephropathic patients following conservative therapy.
Similar results have been found by Meijers et al. [173] in HD patients. Their study showed that prebiotic oligofructose-enriched inulin significantly reduced PCS generation rates and serum concentrations in these patients. In contrast, neither IS generation rates nor serum concentrations changed significantly. PCS appears to be a risk factor for CV pathologies; therefore, its reduction would elicit a protective effect in their insurgence. Such hypothesis is yet to be confirmed by RCTs.
A successive study by Sirich et al. [174] on HD patients has obtained only partially consistent findings Meijers’s. The enrolled HD patients received supplements containing resistant starch (RS). After six weeks of this supplementation, increasing the dietary fiber reduced the unbound, free plasma level of IS. However, the decrease of PCS levels was slighter and did not reach significance. To fully evaluate the effect elicited by probiotics on uremic toxin levels in HD patients, it would be necessary to enroll more subjects and lengthen the probiotic administration time. In case the reduction of uremic toxins was confirmed, the therapy would result useful in the detoxification of HD patients, which would be advantageous for their quality of life and life expectancy; especially because, currently, dialytic strategies are not completely effective in the removal of these toxins [161,162].
Poesen et al. [163] conducted a study in patients with eGFR between 15 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 treated with prebiotic arabinoxylan oligosaccharides (AXOS). No significant effect of AXOS on serum uremic toxins level or 24 h urinary excretion such as PCS, p-cresyl glucuronide (PCG), IS, and phenylacetylglutamine (PAG) was observed, but only a slight decrease in serum TMAO.
These studies have demonstrated how the reduction of the most notable uremic toxins of bacterial origin is only partial. Different prebiotics are able to selectively reduce uremic toxins. In conclusion, further studies are necessary to elucidate the effective therapeutic action of prebiotics in uremic patients and their role in the reduction of the gut microbiota uremic toxins.
7.2. Prebiotics and Diabetes
Both animal- and human-based studies have been conducted in order to comprehend the role of prebiotics in the modulation of glycometabolism in DM.
Prebiotic supplementation with oligofructose in ob/ob mice decreased F/B ratio, increasing Bacteroidetes prevalence [164]. This type of supplementation positively altered the gut microbiota profile, shifting it towards a status of eubiosis (increase of Bifidobacteria). In addition, prebiotics improved lipid and glycemic profiles (Table 2) and, moreover, increased the enteroendocrine L-cell number (involved in the increment of colon weight and length) and ameliorated other parameters (intestinal proglucagon mRNA expression and portal plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 level—GLP1, an incretin that increases insulin release from the pancreas). Furthermore, oligofructose prebiotic supplementation reduced adipose tissue mass, muscle lipid infiltration, oxidative stress (decreasing NADPH oxidase), and inflammation status (reducing IL-1) [165]. This new evidence highlights the potential role for prebiotics in gut microbiota modulation, and their ability to benefit the health of the subject by improving the glyco-metabolic status.
A study by Dehghan [175] has demonstrated that the daily administration of oligofructose-enriched inulin to T2DM women, significantly improved their BMI, insulin resistance, and inflammatory profile (Table 2). This confirms that prebiotics may help in the modulation of inflammatory status as well as in lowering glucose plasma levels in humans. However, this should be confirmed by ulterior studies, monitoring anti-inflammatory effects by quantifying phlogoses indexes in T2DM patients.
Since the positive role played by RS supplementation in healthy individuals and those with metabolic syndrome had already been elucidated, Bodinham et al. [166] set out to investigate its potential beneficial role in T2DM. The study was carried out on a patient sample with well-managed T2DM to whom RS was administered. The results (Table 2) suggest that the beneficial effects achieved by RS supplementation related to meal glucose handling rely on a mechanism which upregulates postprandial GLP1, without needing to modify patient lifestyle (alimentary habits and physical activity levels) and the dose and type of hypoglycemic oral medication [176].
A study by Aliasgharzadeh et al. [167] examined the effects of resistant dextrin (a soluble prebiotic fiber) on insulin resistance and inflammation in T2DM women, as reported in Table 2. Particularly notable are the modifications in two insulin related distinct indexes, namely a decrease in HOMA (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, a computer-solved model used to quantify insulin resistance and beta-cell function) and an increase in QUICKI (quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, determining insulin sensitivity). These findings show that this type of dietary fiber could act as a valuable supplementation for the control of T2DM, thanks to its anti-inflammatory and insulin resistance modulatory properties. Furthermore, a reduction trend in the concentration of FBG, HbA1c and hs-CRP was observed, even though it was not significant. Consequently, it was deduced that resistant dextrin supplementation could reduce the inflammatory state and improve insulin resistance in women with T2DM [168].
7.3. Prebiotic and Hypertension
Marques et al. [169] found that the consumption of a high fiber diet or acetate supplementation changed the intestinal microbiota composition and incremented the abundance of acetate-producing bacteria. Both fiber and acetate decrease gut dysbiosis, measured by F/B ratio, and increase the prevalence of Bacteroides acidifaciens, a bacterium involved in the prevention of obesity and improvement of insulin sensitivity in mice [177]. Both high-fiber diet and acetate supplementation, as shown in Table 2, significantly decreased the BP, cardiac fibrosis, and left ventricular hypertrophy. In addition, acetate markedly reduced renal fibrosis, sign of dysfunction, and CKD. Transcriptome analysis showed that the protective role of high fiber and acetate was related to the down-regulation of cardiac and kidney early growth response protein 1 (Egr1), a nuclear protein involved in cardiac hypertrophy, cardio-renal fibrosis, and inflammation. Prebiotics can; therefore, intervene in NCDs, modulating gut microbiota composition and acting directly on cellular systems involved in the evolution of such pathologies.
Obese patients subjected to a diet based on whole grain, a traditional medicinal Chinese food, and prebiotics (WTP diet), showed decreased BP and body weight, accompanied by increased insulin sensitivity and improvement of the lipid profile (HDL, LDL, PTC, and TG) [178]. An amelioration of dysbiosis was also evident, with a reduction of endotoxin-producing opportunistic pathogens (Enterobacteriaceae and Desulfovibrionaceae) and an increase of gut barrier-protecting bacteria (Bifidobacteriaceae). Moreover, an LPS reduction was observed together with proinflammatory cytokines reduction, and anti-inflammatory adipokine increase (Table 2). In obese subjects, it may be useful to flank a hypocaloric diet with prebiotics, capable of reducing weight, BP, improving the glycemic and lipid profile, and limiting the low-grade chronic inflammatory status present in such condition.
Rault-Nania et al. [179] studied the effect of the supplementation with different inulin-type fructan fractions towards common characteristics of the metabolic syndrome in fructose-fed rats (a typical model of this syndrome). The most effective were the long-chain inulin and oligofructose-enriched inulins. Their supplementation prevented fructose induced CV and kidney damage, as reported in Table 2. All inulin-type fructan-containing diets prevented fructose-induced hypertriglyceridemia; however, their mechanism of action is yet to be elucidated.
Hsu et al. [180] conducted an interesting study regarding the effect of a maternal high fructose diet that induced HTN in the adult offspring. Maternal diet is proposed to have long-term developmental programming hypertensive effects on the adult offspring’s phenotype. The supplementation therapy, which involved either the administration of probiotic L. casei or prebiotic inulin, was shown to prevent HTN in the adult offspring. Therefore, this kind of intervention during gestation can be considered as a reprogramming strategy.
8. Synbiotics
In combination, prebiotics and probiotic bacteria create synbiotics, which can compound prebiotic and probiotic benefits (Table 3).
Table 3.
Synbiotic effects on CKD, DM and HTN.
| Reference | Year | Study Population | Type of the Study | Primary Outcome | p Value for Primary End-Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eslamparast T [179] | 2014 | 38 patients with metabolic syndrome | RDBPC | Decrease in: | |
| FBG | p < 0.001 | ||||
| HOMA-IR | p < 0.001 | ||||
| TG | p < 0.001 | ||||
| PTC | p < 0.01 | ||||
| Increase in: | |||||
| HDL | p < 0.001 | ||||
| Ahmadi S [180] | 2016 | 70 patients with gestational diabetes | RDBPC | Decrease in: | |
| Insulin plasma level | p = 0.005 | ||||
| TAG plasma level | p < 0.001 | ||||
| VLDL plasma level | p < 0.001 | ||||
| HOMA-IR | p = 0.003 | ||||
| HOMA for β cell function | p = 0.008 | ||||
| Increase in: | |||||
| QUICKI | p = 0.02 | ||||
| Pavan M [181] | 2016 | 24 patients with CKD from stage III-V not on renal replacement therapy | Randomized controlled and open-label trial | A lower declining of eGFR | p < 0.001 |
| Guida B [182] | 2017 | 36 KTRs | Single-center, parallel group, double blinded, randomized study | Decrease of PCS level | p < 0.05 |
| Viramontes-Horner D [183] | 2015 | 22 HD patients | RDBPC | Reduction in the presence and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms | p < 0.05 |
CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FFA: free fatty acid; HD, hemodialysis; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; KTR, kidney transplant recipients; PCS, p-Cresyl sulfate; PTC, plasma total cholesterol; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; RDBPC, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled; TAG, triacylglycerol TG, triglyceride; VLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol.
The term synbiotic refers to the synergy present between prebiotic substrate and probiotic organisms. The advantage of such combination lies in the increased survival of the probiotics while passing through the upper intestinal tract, improving and stimulating subsequent implantation and growth [181,182].
Eslamparast et al. [183] conducted a study on a group of subjects affected by metabolic syndrome. They were administered either with synbiotic capsules (L. casei, L. rhamnosus, S. thermophilus, Bifidobacterium breve, L. acidophilus, B. longum, and Lactobacillus bulgaricus, plus fructo-oligosaccharide) and fructo-oligosaccharide, or with placebo capsules. The subjects were instructed to follow an energy balanced diet and to perform physical activity. Results showed that the group treated with synbiotics had significantly improved fasting blood glucose and insulin resistance compared to the placebo group, signifying that synbiotics can have the important role of optimizing the effect of diet and exercise regimens in subjects affected by metabolic syndrome.
A. Ahmadi et al. [184] study determined the effects of symbiotic capsule containing L. acidophilus, L. casei, and B. bifidum plus inulin in subjects affected by gestational diabetes. After six weeks of daily capsule administration, serum insulin levels and HOMA function were decreased, while QUICKI was increased. In addition, the serum TG and VLDL concentrations were significantly decreased. The results indicate that synbiotic therapy could be a valuable approach in managing insulin and lipid parameters in gestational diabetes.
Pavan et al. [185] examined the effects of prebiotic and probiotic supplementation plus low protein diet in order to evaluate the effect of this combined approach on the progression of CKD. It was observed that this kind of therapeutic treatment was able to decrease the decline in eGFR in stage III–IV CKD patients, compared to the dietary restriction alone. The administration of synbiotics, associated to a low-protein diet may therefore enhance the efficacy of the diet in order to slow down CKD progression.
A study by Guida et al. [186] suggests that treatment with synbiotics (containing L. plantarum, L. casei ssp. rhamnosus, L. gasseri, Bifiodbacterium infantis, B. longum, L. acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus sporogenes, S. thermophilus, inulin, and tapioca-resistant starch), may be effective in lowering plasma PCS concentrations in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). A pilot study was conducted on 36 KTR and showed that after 30 days of treatment plasma PCS decreased by 30%, compared to baseline, in the synbiotic treated group, whilst no significant changes in renal function, glycemia, plasma lipids, or albumin concentration were observed. Therefore, successive studies on a larger scale and with a longer follow up period are required in order to determine if such intervention also has some cardioprotective roles.
Finally, synbiotic gel (L. acidophilus, B. lactis and inulin) administration for the control of gastro-intestinal symptoms (GIS) and complications in HD patients has been explored. After a two-month long treatment, there was a significant reduction in the frequency and severity of symptoms such as vomit, heartburn, and stomachache; evaluated thanks to a self-administered questionnaire. The study concluded that synbiotic gel treatment is a safe yet simple strategy to control common GIS during HD [187].
9. Postbiotics and Fecal Microbiota Transplant
In recent years, postbiotics (metabiotics, biogenics, or metabolites/cell-free supernatants) have emerged as a potential instrument to modulate the gut microbiota [188]. They are intracellular soluble factors secreted by live bacteria as metabolic products or released after bacterial lysis [189].
Postbiotics include enzymes (for example NADH-peroxidase, glutathione peroxidase), proteins (glutathione), polysaccharides, organic acids (e.g., propionic acid), lipids (SCFA), teichoic acids, and cell surface proteins. In the majority of cases, postbiotics are derived from Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains, more seldom from other bacteria such as Streptococcus and Faecalibacterium species [190]. These soluble factors have demonstrated beneficial effects on the health status, by carrying out antimicrobial, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory functions, which positively influence the microbiota composition [191]. Currently, no studies have been conducted to elucidate the effect on NCD in humans [192]. Animal studies have been conducted, particularly in the poultry industry. These highlighted the postbiotic power to inhibit pathogens, increase the weight, and ameliorate microbial composition and inflammatory profile [193,194].
A study by Sokol et al. [195] has demonstrated, in an animal model of Crohn disease, a beneficial effect induced by the administration of F. prausnitzii or its supernatant on the correction of dysbiosis and reducing inflammation. A successive study by Cavallari et al. [196] conducted in a murine model of obesity-induced insulin resistance via IRF4, has demonstrated an increase in insulin sensitivity following administration of muramyl-dipeptide derived from the bacterial cell wall. The administration postbiotics derived from lactobacillus was capable to contrast inflammation induced by diseases of the small intestine or from Salmonella infection in an ex-vivo organ culture model [197].
Postbiotic use represents a valid therapeutic approach in NCDs, as it could improve the chronic inflammatory status in such pathologies and limit the growth of pathogenic species, contrasting dysbiosis.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an innovative treatment that is still in an experimental stage. FMT consists in the administration of a solution containing fecal matter from a healthy donor to the gastrointestinal tract of the receiving patient, and it is proposed as a useful tool for the reinstallation of eubiosis [198]. The administration may occur through various methods: nasogastric tube, nasojejunal tube, esofagastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, or enema [199]. To reduce the risk of transmission of infections or other pathologies, it is fundamental that the donor undergoes rigorous screening for pathologies with an infectious, neoplastic, metabolic, and autoimmune basis [200]. FMT is considered safe and well tolerated [201]; however, not completely free of side effects such as abdominal discomfort, bloating, transient fever, flatulence, constipation, vomiting, and diarrhea [202]. Few studies are related to the long-term effects of FMT, such as pathologies related to microbiota composition changes like obesity, DM, neoplasia, asthma, and autism [203]. Therefore, it is essential to perform more studies with an extensive follow up period post FMT. Currently, the most well-known pathology for which FMT is effective is severe or recurrent C. difficile infection [204]. Still in a preliminary phase instead, is the utilization of FMT for the treatment of metabolic, CV, autoimmune, and neurologic conditions [205]. Concerning this, is an important study conducted by Vrieze et al. [206], which demonstrates how lean donor microbiota infusion determines an increase in insulin sensitivity in metabolic syndrome sufferers. Ulterior studies are required in order to validate the efficacy of FMT on pathologies associated with dysbiosis.
10. Conclusions
Over the last years, the gut microbiota has received increasing interest from scientific literature, and has started to be considered as a real “new organ”, that influences numerous biological functions of the organism, such as immunity, digestion, and metabolism. Thanks to new sequencing technologies, an enormous complexity and a substantial number of potential genes of the microbiota have been identified. Available clinical and experimental evidence has established the clear role of the microbiota in chronic NCDs. Initially scientific data was uniquely generated from rodent models, recently; however, the importance of a healthy gut microbiota is being demonstrated in humans. Administration of probiotics and prebiotics has been widely used in order to manipulate the gut microbiota. However, although several studies reported encouraging results, long term efficacy of this treatment is still being researched. In fact, one of the future challenges relating to the use of probiotics and prebiotics is linked to producing standardized safety guidelines for the use of these supplements in humans (particularly in order to determine side effects such as bloating, flatulence, and generalized gastrointestinal discomfort). Therefore, additional studies and randomized controlled trials are required for a deeper understanding of the clinical impact of gut microbiota manipulation. Another interesting and intricate challenge is to understand whether the administration of these supplements may lead to genetic interactions via genetic exchange between the digested strains and the indigenous flora, area of research, which remains currently virtually unexplored [207]. For the future, large prospective cohort studies could provide more evidence and information on clinical relevance of the microbiota as a potential pathogenic factor for the development of chronic NCDs.
Abbreviation
| ACE | Angiotensin-converting enzyme |
| AXOS | Arabinoxylan oligosaccharides |
| BF | Burkina Faso |
| BMI | Body mass index |
| BP | Blood pressure |
| CK | Creatine kinase |
| CKD | Chronic kidney disease |
| CRP | C-reactive protein |
| CV | Cardiovascular |
| CysC | Cystatin C |
| DKD | Diabetic kidney disease |
| DM | Diabetes mellitus |
| DMB | 3,3-Dimethyl-1-butanol |
| e-GFR | Estimated glomerular filtration rate |
| Egr1 | Early growth response protein 1 |
| EH | Essential hypertension |
| EPO | Erythropoietin |
| EU | European Union |
| F/B | Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio |
| FAO | Food Agricultural Organization |
| FBG | Fasting blood glucose |
| FBI | Fasting blood insulin |
| FDY | Freeze-dried powdered yacon |
| FetA | Fetuin A |
| FFAs | Free fatty acids |
| FMT | Fecal microbiota transplant |
| FOS | Fructooligosaccharides |
| GF | Germ-free |
| GLP1 | Glucagon-like peptide-1 |
| Gpr41 | G protein receptor 41 |
| GSH | Glutathione |
| GVNA | Gastric vagal nerve activity |
| HbA1c | Glycated hemoglobin |
| HD | Hemodialysis |
| HDL | High-density lipoprotein |
| HFD | High-fat diet |
| HFF | High fructose fed |
| HIF | Ipoxia-inducible factor |
| HOMA | Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance |
| hs-CRP | High-sensitivity C-ractive protein |
| HT | Hydroxytyrosol |
| HTN | Arterial hypertension |
| IAA | Indole 3-acetic acid |
| Ile-Pro-Pro | Isoleucyl–prolyl–proline |
| IS | Indoxyl sulfate |
| ISAPP | International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics |
| K-DOQI | Kidney-Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative |
| KDQOL | Kidney Disease Quality of Life |
| KIM-1 | Kidney injury molecule-1 |
| KTR | Kidney transplant recipients |
| L-NAME | Nitro-L-arginine methylester |
| LcS | Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota |
| LDL | Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol |
| LFD | Low-fat diet |
| LPS | Lipopolysaccharide |
| MDA | Malondialdehyde |
| MGWAS | Metagenome-wide association study |
| MHP | Microbiome Human Project |
| NADPH | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate |
| NCD | Chronic non-communicable diseases |
| NEFA | Non-esterified fatty acid |
| NO | Nitric oxide |
| Olfr78 | Olfactory receptor 78 |
| PAG | Phenylacetylglutamine |
| PCG | p-cresyl glucuronide |
| PCS | p-cresyl sulphate |
| PD | Peritoneal dialysis |
| pHTN | pre-hypertension |
| PTC | Plasma total cholesterol |
| QUICKI | Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, determining insulin sensitivity |
| R | Dahl salt-resistant |
| RCTs | Randomized clinical trials |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| RS | Resistant starch |
| RSNA | Renal sympathetic nerve activity |
| S | Dahl salt-sensitive |
| SCFAs | Short chain fatty acids |
| SHR | Spontaneously hypertensive rats |
| SIRT1 | Sirtuin1 |
| SMAD3 | Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 |
| TBARS | Thiobarbituric acid reactive species |
| TG | Triglycerides |
| TGF | Transforming growth factor |
| TIMP1 | Metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 |
| TLRs | Toll-like receptors |
| TMAO | Trimethylamine-N-oxide |
| TNF-α | Tumor necrosis factor-α |
| Val-Pro-Pro | Valyl–prolyl–proline |
| VLDL | Very-low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol |
| WBC | White blood cell |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization A.N. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation: G.M., F.D.D., E.O. and G.W.J.; review and editing A.N., R.B., A.R. and V.R.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
Authors declare not to have any conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Qin J., Li R., Raes J., Arumugam M., Burgdorf K.S., Manichanh C., Nielsen T., Pons N., Levenez F., Yamada T., et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rosner J.L. Ten Times More Microbial Cells than Body Cells in Humans? Microbe. 2014;9:47. doi: 10.1128/microbe.9.47.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sender R., Fuchs S., Milo R. Are We Really Vastly Outnumbered? Revisiting the Ratio of Bacterial to Host Cells in Humans. Cell. 2016;164:337–340. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marchesi J.R., Ravel J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: A proposal. Microbiome. 2015;3:31. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.The Human Microbiome Project Consortium Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baquero F., Nombela C. The microbiome as a human organ. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012;18(Suppl. 4):2–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03916.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Biagi E., Franceschi C., Rampelli S., Severgnini M., Ostan R., Turroni S., Consolandi C., Quercia S., Scurti M., Monti D., et al. Gut Microbiota and Extreme Longevity. Curr. Biol. 2016;26:1480–1485. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Turnbaugh P.J., Ley R.E., Hamady M., Fraser-Liggett C.M., Knight R., Gordon J.I. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449:804–810. doi: 10.1038/nature06244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lloyd-Price J., Abu-Ali G., Huttenhower C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med. 2016;8:51. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shafquat A., Joice R., Simmons S.L., Huttenhower C. Functional and phylogenetic assembly of microbial communities in the human microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dominguez-Bello M.G., Costello E.K., Contreras M., Magris M., Hidalgo G., Fierer N., Knight R. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:11971–11975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002601107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rodriguez J.M., Murphy K., Stanton C., Ross R.P., Kober O.I., Juge N., Avershina E., Rudi K., Narbad A., Jenmalm M.C., et al. The composition of the gut microbiota throughout life, with an emphasis on early life. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015;26:26050. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.26050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huurre A., Kalliomaki M., Rautava S., Rinne M., Salminen S., Isolauri E. Mode of delivery—Effects on gut microbiota and humoral immunity. Neonatology. 2008;93:236–240. doi: 10.1159/000111102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mountzouris K.C., McCartney A.L., Gibson G.R. Intestinal microflora of human infants and current trends for its nutritional modulation. Br. J. Nutr. 2002;87:405–420. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adlerberth I. Factors influencing the establishment of the intestinal microbiota in infancy. Nestle Nutr. Workshop Ser. Pediatr. Progr. 2008;62:13–29. doi: 10.1159/000146245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Azad M.B., Konya T., Maughan H., Guttman D.S., Field C.J., Chari R.S., Sears M.R., Becker A.B., Scott J.A., Kozyrskyj A.L., et al. Gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants: Profiles by mode of delivery and infant diet at 4 months. CMAJ. 2013;185:385–394. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jackson K.M., Nazar A.M. Breastfeeding, the immune response, and long-term health. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2006;106:203–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gaulke C.A., Sharpton T.J. The influence of ethnicity and geography on human gut microbiome composition. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1495–1496. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0210-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Deschasaux M., Bouter K.E., Prodan A., Levin E., Groen A.K., Herrema H., Tremaroli V., Bakker G.J., Attaye I., Pinto-Sietsma S.J., et al. Depicting the composition of gut microbiota in a population with varied ethnic origins but shared geography. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1526–1531. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0160-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Annalisa N., Alessio T., Claudette T.D., Erald V., Antonino D.L., Nicola D.D. Gut Microbioma Population: An Indicator Really Sensible to Any Change in Age, Diet, Metabolic Syndrome, and Life-Style. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014;2014:901308. doi: 10.1155/2014/901308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.De Filippo C., Cavalieri D., Di Paola M., Ramazzotti M., Poullet J.B., Massart S., Collini S., Pieraccini G., Lionetti P. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:14691–14696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005963107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Duda-Chodak A., Tarko T., Satora P., Sroka P. Interaction of dietary compounds, especially polyphenols, with the intestinal microbiota: A review. Eur. J. Nutr. 2015;54:325–341. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0852-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Parkar S.G., Stevenson D.E., Skinner M.A. The potential influence of fruit polyphenols on colonic microflora and human gut health. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008;124:295–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Duda-Chodak A. The inhibitory effect of polyphenols on human gut microbiota. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2012;63:497–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cory H., Passarelli S., Szeto J., Tamez M., Mattei J. The Role of Polyphenols in Human Health and Food Systems: A Mini-Review. Front. Nutr. 2018;5:87. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cianci R., Pagliari D., Piccirillo C.A., Fritz J.H., Gambassi G. The Microbiota and Immune System Crosstalk in Health and Disease. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018;2018:2912539. doi: 10.1155/2018/2912539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cote C.D., Rasmussen B.A., Duca F.A., Zadeh-Tahmasebi M., Baur J.A., Daljeet M., Breen D.M., Filippi B.M., Lam T.K. Resveratrol activates duodenal Sirt1 to reverse insulin resistance in rats through a neuronal network. Nat. Med. 2015;21:498–505. doi: 10.1038/nm.3821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sung M.M., Kim T.T., Denou E., Soltys C.M., Hamza S.M., Byrne N.J., Masson G., Park H., Wishart D.S., Madsen K.L., et al. Improved Glucose Homeostasis in Obese Mice Treated with Resveratrol Is Associated with Alterations in the Gut Microbiome. Diabetes. 2017;66:418–425. doi: 10.2337/db16-0680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liao W., Yin X., Li Q., Zhang H., Liu Z., Zheng X., Zheng L., Feng X. Resveratrol-Induced White Adipose Tissue Browning in Obese Mice by Remodeling Fecal Microbiota. Molecules. 2018;23:3356. doi: 10.3390/molecules23123356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Qiao Y., Sun J., Xia S., Tang X., Shi Y., Le G. Effects of resveratrol on gut microbiota and fat storage in a mouse model with high-fat-induced obesity. Food Funct. 2014;5:1241–1249. doi: 10.1039/c3fo60630a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Crovesy L., Ostrowski M., Ferreira D., Rosado E.L., Soares-Mota M. Effect of Lactobacillus on body weight and body fat in overweight subjects: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int. J. Obes. 2017;41:1607–1614. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dao M.C., Everard A., Aron-Wisnewsky J., Sokolovska N., Prifti E., Verger E.O., Kayser B.D., Levenez F., Chilloux J., Hoyles L., et al. Akkermansia muciniphila and improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: Relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut. 2016;65:426–436. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ahmadi S., Mainali R., Nagpal R., Sheikh-Zeinoddin M., Soleimanian-Zad S., Wang S., Deep G., Kumar Mishra S., Yadav H. Dietary Polysaccharides in the Amelioration of Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis and Metabolic Diseases. Obes. Control. Ther. 2017;4 doi: 10.15226/2374-8354/4/2/00140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cheng W., Lu J., Li B., Lin W., Zhang Z., Wei X., Sun C., Chi M., Bi W., Yang B., et al. Effect of Functional Oligosaccharides and Ordinary Dietary Fiber on Intestinal Microbiota Diversity. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1750. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peyrol J., Riva C., Amiot M.J. Hydroxytyrosol in the Prevention of the Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders. Nutrients. 2017;9:306. doi: 10.3390/nu9030306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Possemiers S., Bolca S., Verstraete W., Heyerick A. The intestinal microbiome: A separate organ inside the body with the metabolic potential to influence the bioactivity of botanicals. Fitoterapia. 2011;82:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koenig J.E., Spor A., Scalfone N., Fricker A.D., Stombaugh J., Knight R., Angenent L.T., Ley R.E. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108(Suppl. 1):4578–4585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000081107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zapata H.J., Quagliarello V.J. The microbiota and microbiome in aging: Potential implications in health and age-related diseases. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2015;63:776–781. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lofmark S., Jernberg C., Jansson J.K., Edlund C. Clindamycin-induced enrichment and long-term persistence of resistant Bacteroides spp. and resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006;58:1160–1167. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Clarke S.F., Murphy E.F., O’Sullivan O., Lucey A.J., Humphreys M., Hogan A., Hayes P., O’Reilly M., Jeffery I.B., Wood-Martin R., et al. Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut. 2014;63:1913–1920. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Prehn-Kristensen A., Zimmermann A., Tittmann L., Lieb W., Schreiber S., Baving L., Fischer A. Reduced microbiome alpha diversity in young patients with ADHD. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0200728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Karlsson C.L., Onnerfalt J., Xu J., Molin G., Ahrne S., Thorngren-Jerneck K. The microbiota of the gut in preschool children with normal and excessive body weight. Obesity. 2012;20:2257–2261. doi: 10.1038/oby.2012.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Everard A., Belzer C., Geurts L., Ouwerkerk J.P., Druart C., Bindels L.B., Guiot Y., Derrien M., Muccioli G.G., Delzenne N.M., et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:9066–9071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219451110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ottman N., Geerlings S.Y., Aalvink S., de Vos W.M., Belzer C. Action and function of Akkermansia muciniphila in microbiome ecology, health and disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2017;31:637–642. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Derrien M., Vaughan E.E., Plugge C.M., de Vos W.M. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004;54:1469–1476. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02873-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Turnbaugh P.J., Ley R.E., Mahowald M.A., Magrini V., Mardis E.R., Gordon J.I. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–1031. doi: 10.1038/nature05414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Arumugam M., Raes J., Pelletier E., Le Paslier D., Yamada T., Mende D.R., Fernandes G.R., Tap J., Bruls T., Batto J.M., et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473:174–180. doi: 10.1038/nature09944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wu G.D., Chen J., Hoffmann C., Bittinger K., Chen Y.Y., Keilbaugh S.A., Bewtra M., Knights D., Walters W.A., Knight R., et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 2011;334:105–108. doi: 10.1126/science.1208344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Knights D., Ward T.L., McKinlay C.E., Miller H., Gonzalez A., McDonald D., Knight R. Rethinking “enterotypes”. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16:433–437. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jeffery I.B., Claesson M.J., O’Toole P.W., Shanahan F. Categorization of the gut microbiota: Enterotypes or gradients? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:591–592. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Clemente J.C., Ursell L.K., Parfrey L.W., Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: An integrative view. Cell. 2012;148:1258–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zuo T., Ng S.C. The Gut Microbiota in the Pathogenesis and Therapeutics of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2247. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nguyen T.L., Vieira-Silva S., Liston A., Raes J. How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research? Dis. Model. Mech. 2015;8:1–16. doi: 10.1242/dmm.017400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Eckburg P.B., Bik E.M., Bernstein C.N., Purdom E., Dethlefsen L., Sargent M., Gill S.R., Nelson K.E., Relman D.A. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005;308:1635–1638. doi: 10.1126/science.1110591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ley R.E., Backhed F., Turnbaugh P., Lozupone C.A., Knight R.D., Gordon J.I. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:11070–11075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504978102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ley R.E., Turnbaugh P.J., Klein S., Gordon J.I. Microbial ecology: Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444:1022–1023. doi: 10.1038/4441022a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Einheber A., Carter D. The role of the microbial flora in uremia. I. Survival times of germfree, limited-flora, and conventionalized rats after bilateral nephrectomy and fasting. J. Exp. Med. 1966;123:239–250. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.2.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Aronov P.A., Luo F.J., Plummer N.S., Quan Z., Holmes S., Hostetter T.H., Meyer T.W. Colonic contribution to uremic solutes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011;22:1769–1776. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010121220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vaziri N.D., Wong J., Pahl M., Piceno Y.M., Yuan J., DeSantis T.Z., Ni Z., Nguyen T.H., Andersen G.L. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 2013;83:308–315. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rowland I., Gibson G., Heinken A., Scott K., Swann J., Thiele I., Tuohy K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018;57:1–24. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1445-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pluznick J.L. Gut microbiota in renal physiology: Focus on short-chain fatty acids and their receptors. Kidney Int. 2016;90:1191–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.06.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sokol H., Seksik P., Furet J.P., Firmesse O., Nion-Larmurier I., Beaugerie L., Cosnes J., Corthier G., Marteau P., Dore J. Low counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in colitis microbiota. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1183–1189. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chang P.V., Hao L., Offermanns S., Medzhitov R. The microbial metabolite butyrate regulates intestinal macrophage function via histone deacetylase inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:2247–2252. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322269111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Dessi M., Noce A., Agnoli A., De Angelis S., Fuiano L., Tozzo C., Taccone-Gallucci M., Fuiano G., Federici G. The usefulness of the prognostic inflammatory and nutritional index (PINI) in a haemodialysis population. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2009;19:811–815. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Missailidis C., Hallqvist J., Qureshi A.R., Barany P., Heimburger O., Lindholm B., Stenvinkel P., Bergman P. Serum Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Is Strongly Related to Renal Function and Predicts Outcome in Chronic Kidney Disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0141738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tang W.H., Wang Z., Levison B.S., Koeth R.A., Britt E.B., Fu X., Wu Y., Hazen S.L. Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1575–1584. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Stubbs J.R., House J.A., Ocque A.J., Zhang S., Johnson C., Kimber C., Schmidt K., Gupta A., Wetmore J.B., Nolin T.D., et al. Serum Trimethylamine-N-Oxide is Elevated in CKD and Correlates with Coronary Atherosclerosis Burden. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016;27:305–313. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014111063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tang W.H., Wang Z., Kennedy D.J., Wu Y., Buffa J.A., Agatisa-Boyle B., Li X.S., Levison B.S., Hazen S.L. Gut microbiota-dependent trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) pathway contributes to both development of renal insufficiency and mortality risk in chronic kidney disease. Circ. Res. 2015;116:448–455. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kim R.B., Morse B.L., Djurdjev O., Tang M., Muirhead N., Barrett B., Holmes D.T., Madore F., Clase C.M., Rigatto C., et al. Advanced chronic kidney disease populations have elevated trimethylamine N-oxide levels associated with increased cardiovascular events. Kidney Int. 2016;89:1144–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sun G., Yin Z., Liu N., Bian X., Yu R., Su X., Zhang B., Wang Y. Gut microbial metabolite TMAO contributes to renal dysfunction in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017;493:964–970. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.09.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Watanabe H., Miyamoto Y., Otagiri M., Maruyama T. Update on the pharmacokinetics and redox properties of protein-bound uremic toxins. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011;100:3682–3695. doi: 10.1002/jps.22592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Miyazaki T., Ise M., Seo H., Niwa T. Indoxyl sulfate increases the gene expressions of TGF-beta 1, TIMP-1 and pro-alpha 1(I) collagen in uremic rat kidneys. Kidney Int. Suppl. 1997;62:S15–S22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Barreto F.C., Barreto D.V., Liabeuf S., Meert N., Glorieux G., Temmar M., Choukroun G., Vanholder R., Massy Z.A., European Uremic Toxin Work Group Serum indoxyl sulfate is associated with vascular disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009;4:1551–1558. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03980609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Watanabe H., Miyamoto Y., Honda D., Tanaka H., Wu Q., Endo M., Noguchi T., Kadowaki D., Ishima Y., Kotani S., et al. p-Cresyl sulfate causes renal tubular cell damage by inducing oxidative stress by activation of NADPH oxidase. Kidney Int. 2013;83:582–592. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bammens B., Evenepoel P., Keuleers H., Verbeke K., Vanrenterghem Y. Free serum concentrations of the protein-bound retention solute p-cresol predict mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1081–1087. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Anders H.J., Andersen K., Stecher B. The intestinal microbiota, a leaky gut, and abnormal immunity in kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;83:1010–1016. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fernandez-Prado R., Esteras R., Perez-Gomez M.V., Gracia-Iguacel C., Gonzalez-Parra E., Sanz A.B., Ortiz A., Sanchez-Nino M.D. Nutrients Turned into Toxins: Microbiota Modulation of Nutrient Properties in Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients. 2017;9:489. doi: 10.3390/nu9050489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Alam U., Asghar O., Azmi S., Malik R.A. General aspects of diabetes mellitus. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2014;126:211–222. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53480-4.00015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Cani P.D., Amar J., Iglesias M.A., Poggi M., Knauf C., Bastelica D., Neyrinck A.M., Fava F., Tuohy K.M., Chabo C., et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2007;56:1761–1772. doi: 10.2337/db06-1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Noce A., Fabrini R., Dessi M., Bocedi A., Santini S., Rovella V., Pastore A., Tesauro M., Bernardini S., Di Daniele N., et al. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase activity: A possible early biomarker for blood toxicity in uremic diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51:219–224. doi: 10.1007/s00592-013-0497-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Di Daniele N., Noce A., Vidiri M.F., Moriconi E., Marrone G., Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli M., D’Urso G., Tesauro M., Rovella V., De Lorenzo A. Impact of Mediterranean diet on metabolic syndrome, cancer and longevity. Oncotarget. 2017;8:8947–8979. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Boulange C.L., Neves A.L., Chilloux J., Nicholson J.K., Dumas M.E. Impact of the gut microbiota on inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease. Genome Med. 2016;8:42. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0303-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Cani P.D., Knauf C., Iglesias M.A., Drucker D.J., Delzenne N.M., Burcelin R. Improvement of glucose tolerance and hepatic insulin sensitivity by oligofructose requires a functional glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor. Diabetes. 2006;55:1484–1490. doi: 10.2337/db05-1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ingalls A.M., Dickie M.M., Snell G.D. Obese, a new mutation in the house mouse. J. Hered. 1950;41:317–318. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a106073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Membrez M., Blancher F., Jaquet M., Bibiloni R., Cani P.D., Burcelin R.G., Corthesy I., Mace K., Chou C.J. Gut microbiota modulation with norfloxacin and ampicillin enhances glucose tolerance in mice. FASEB J. 2008;22:2416–2426. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-102723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Schneeberger M., Everard A., Gomez-Valades A.G., Matamoros S., Ramirez S., Delzenne N.M., Gomis R., Claret M., Cani P.D. Akkermansia muciniphila inversely correlates with the onset of inflammation, altered adipose tissue metabolism and metabolic disorders during obesity in mice. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:16643. doi: 10.1038/srep16643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Creely S.J., McTernan P.G., Kusminski C.M., Fisher f M., Da Silva N.F., Khanolkar M., Evans M., Harte A.L., Kumar S. Lipopolysaccharide activates an innate immune system response in human adipose tissue in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;292:E740–E747. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00302.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Amar J., Serino M., Lange C., Chabo C., Iacovoni J., Mondot S., Lepage P., Klopp C., Mariette J., Bouchez O., et al. Involvement of tissue bacteria in the onset of diabetes in humans: Evidence for a concept. Diabetologia. 2011;54:3055–3061. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2329-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Woo P.C., Lau S.K., Teng J.L., Tse H., Yuen K.Y. Then and now: Use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008;14:908–934. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhang X., Shen D., Fang Z., Jie Z., Qiu X., Zhang C., Chen Y., Ji L. Human gut microbiota changes reveal the progression of glucose intolerance. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Qin J., Li Y., Cai Z., Li S., Zhu J., Zhang F., Liang S., Zhang W., Guan Y., Shen D., et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012;490:55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature11450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Karlsson F.H., Tremaroli V., Nookaew I., Bergstrom G., Behre C.J., Fagerberg B., Nielsen J., Backhed F. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature. 2013;498:99–103. doi: 10.1038/nature12198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hansen T.H., Gobel R.J., Hansen T., Pedersen O. The gut microbiome in cardio-metabolic health. Genome Med. 2015;7:33. doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0157-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yang T., Santisteban M.M., Rodriguez V., Li E., Ahmari N., Carvajal J.M., Zadeh M., Gong M., Qi Y., Zubcevic J., et al. Gut dysbiosis is linked to hypertension. Hypertension. 2015;65:1331–1340. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Adnan S., Nelson J.W., Ajami N.J., Venna V.R., Petrosino J.F., Bryan R.M., Jr., Durgan D.J. Alterations in the gut microbiota can elicit hypertension in rats. Physiol. Genom. 2017;49:96–104. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00081.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mell B., Jala V.R., Mathew A.V., Byun J., Waghulde H., Zhang Y., Haribabu B., Vijay-Kumar M., Pennathur S., Joe B. Evidence for a link between gut microbiota and hypertension in the Dahl rat. Physiol. Genom. 2015;47:187–197. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00136.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Pluznick J.L., Protzko R.J., Gevorgyan H., Peterlin Z., Sipos A., Han J., Brunet I., Wan L.X., Rey F., Wang T., et al. Olfactory receptor responding to gut microbiota-derived signals plays a role in renin secretion and blood pressure regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:4410–4415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215927110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Li J., Zhao F., Wang Y., Chen J., Tao J., Tian G., Wu S., Liu W., Cui Q., Geng B., et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of hypertension. Microbiome. 2017;5:14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0222-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G.R., Merenstein D.J., Pot B., Morelli L., Canani R.B., Flint H.J., Salminen S., et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kopple J.D. National kidney foundation K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2001;37:S66–S70. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.20748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Cruz M.C., Andrade C., Urrutia M., Draibe S., Nogueira-Martins L.A., Sesso Rde C. Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clinics. 2011;66:991–995. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000600012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Miranda Alatriste P.V., Urbina Arronte R., Gomez Espinosa C.O., Espinosa Cuevas Mde L. Effect of probiotics on human blood urea levels in patients with chronic renal failure. Nutr. Hosp. 2014;29:582–590. doi: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.3.7179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Miraghajani M., Zaghian N., Dehkohneh A., Mirlohi M., Ghiasvand R. Probiotic Soy Milk Consumption and Renal Function Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2019;11:124–132. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9325-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Le Barz M., Anhe F.F., Varin T.V., Desjardins Y., Levy E., Roy D., Urdaci M.C., Marette A. Probiotics as Complementary Treatment for Metabolic Disorders. Diabetes Metab. J. 2015;39:291–303. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2015.39.4.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Yadav H., Jain S., Sinha P.R. Effect of skim milk and dahi (yogurt) on blood glucose, insulin, and lipid profile in rats fed with high fructose diet. J. Med. Food. 2006;9:328–335. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2006.9.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Thorburn A.W., Storlien L.H., Jenkins A.B., Khouri S., Kraegen E.W. Fructose-induced in vivo insulin resistance and elevated plasma triglyceride levels in rats. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1989;49:1155–1163. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/49.6.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Yadav H., Jain S., Sinha P.R. Antidiabetic effect of probiotic dahi containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei in high fructose fed rats. Nutrition. 2007;23:62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Parvez S., Malik K.A., Ah Kang S., Kim H.Y. Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006;100:1171–1185. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Upadrasta A., Madempudi R.S. Probiotics and blood pressure: Current insights. Integr. Blood Press. Control. 2016;9:33–42. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S73246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Mauriello A., Rovella V., Anemona L., Servadei F., Giannini E., Bove P., Anselmo A., Melino G., Di Daniele N. Increased Sympathetic Renal Innervation in Hemodialysis Patients Is the Anatomical Substrate of Sympathetic Hyperactivity in End-Stage Renal Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2015;4 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Biancardi V.C., Bomfim G.F., Reis W.L., Al-Gassimi S., Nunes K.P. The interplay between Angiotensin II, TLR4 and hypertension. Pharmacol. Res. 2017;120:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Xu J., Ahren I.L., Prykhodko O., Olsson C., Ahrne S., Molin G. Intake of Blueberry Fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum Affects the Gut Microbiota of L-NAME Treated Rats. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013;2013:809128. doi: 10.1155/2013/809128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Nakamura Y., Yamamoto N., Sakai K., Okubo A., Yamazaki S., Takano T. Purification and characterization of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors from sour milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1995;78:777–783. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76689-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Jauhiainen T., Vapaatalo H., Poussa T., Kyronpalo S., Rasmussen M., Korpela R. Lactobacillus helveticus fermented milk lowers blood pressure in hypertensive subjects in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement. Am. J. Hypertens. 2005;18:1600–1605. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Metchnikoff E. In: The Prolongation of Life: Optimistic Studies. Mitchell P.C., editor. G P Putnam’s Sons; New York, NY, USA: 1910. 96p [Google Scholar]
- 116.He M., Shi B. Gut microbiota as a potential target of metabolic syndrome: The role of probiotics and prebiotics. Cell Biosci. 2017;7:54. doi: 10.1186/s13578-017-0183-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Wang I.K., Wu Y.Y., Yang Y.F., Ting I.W., Lin C.C., Yen T.H., Chen J.H., Wang C.H., Huang C.C., Lin H.C. The effect of probiotics on serum levels of cytokine and endotoxin in peritoneal dialysis patients: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Benef. Microbes. 2015;6:423–430. doi: 10.3920/BM2014.0088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Stenvinkel P., Ketteler M., Johnson R.J., Lindholm B., Pecoits-Filho R., Riella M., Heimburger O., Cederholm T., Girndt M. IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-alpha: Central factors in the altered cytokine network of uremia—The good, the bad, and the ugly. Kidney Int. 2005;67:1216–1233. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Kimmel P.L., Phillips T.M., Simmens S.J., Peterson R.A., Weihs K.L., Alleyne S., Cruz I., Yanovski J.A., Veis J.H. Immunologic function and survival in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1998;54:236–244. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00981.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hauser A.B., Stinghen A.E., Goncalves S.M., Bucharles S., Pecoits-Filho R. A gut feeling on endotoxemia: Causes and consequences in chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin. Pract. 2011;118:c165–c172. doi: 10.1159/000321438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Vitetta L., Linnane A.W., Gobe G.C. From the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) to the kidneys: Live bacterial cultures (probiotics) mediating reductions of uremic toxin levels via free radical signaling. Toxins. 2013;5:2042–2057. doi: 10.3390/toxins5112042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Ranganathan N., Patel B., Ranganathan P., Marczely J., Dheer R., Chordia T., Dunn S.R., Friedman E.A. Probiotic amelioration of azotemia in 5/6th nephrectomized Sprague-Dawley rats. Sci. World J. 2005;5:652–660. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2005.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ranganathan N., Ranganathan P., Friedman E.A., Joseph A., Delano B., Goldfarb D.S., Tam P., Rao A.V., Anteyi E., Musso C.G. Pilot study of probiotic dietary supplementation for promoting healthy kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Adv. Ther. 2010;27:634–647. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Natarajan R., Pechenyak B., Vyas U., Ranganathan P., Weinberg A., Liang P., Mallappallil M.C., Norin A.J., Friedman E.A., Saggi S.J. Randomized controlled trial of strain-specific probiotic formulation (Renadyl) in dialysis patients. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:568571. doi: 10.1155/2014/568571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Ranganathan N., Patel B.G., Ranganathan P., Marczely J., Dheer R., Pechenyak B., Dunn S.R., Verstraete W., Decroos K., Mehta R., et al. In vitro and in vivo assessment of intraintestinal bacteriotherapy in chronic kidney disease. ASAIO J. 2006;52:70–79. doi: 10.1097/01.mat.0000191345.45735.00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Chiang C.K., Tanaka T., Inagi R., Fujita T., Nangaku M. Indoxyl sulfate, a representative uremic toxin, suppresses erythropoietin production in a HIF-dependent manner. Lab. Investig. 2011;91:1564–1571. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2011.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Wu C.J., Chen C.Y., Lai T.S., Wu P.C., Chuang C.K., Sun F.J., Liu H.L., Chen H.H., Yeh H.I., Lin C.S., et al. The role of indoxyl sulfate in renal anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Oncotarget. 2017;8:83030–83037. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Asai H., Hirata J., Watanabe-Akanuma M. Indoxyl glucuronide, a protein-bound uremic toxin, inhibits hypoxia-inducible factordependent erythropoietin expression through activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;504:538–544. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.National Kidney F. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S1–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Miraghajani M., Zaghian N., Mirlohi M., Feizi A., Ghiasvand R. The Impact of Probiotic Soy Milk Consumption on Oxidative Stress Among Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J. Ren. Nutr. 2017;27:317–324. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2017.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Kumawat M., Sharma T.K., Singh I., Singh N., Ghalaut V.S., Vardey S.K., Shankar V. Antioxidant Enzymes and Lipid Peroxidation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with and without Nephropathy. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2013;5:213–219. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.109193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Tiwari B.K., Pandey K.B., Abidi A.B., Rizvi S.I. Markers of Oxidative Stress during Diabetes Mellitus. J. Biomark. 2013;2013:378790. doi: 10.1155/2013/378790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Jha J.C., Banal C., Chow B.S., Cooper M.E., Jandeleit-Dahm K. Diabetes and Kidney Disease: Role of Oxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016;25:657–684. doi: 10.1089/ars.2016.6664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Nasri H., Ardalan M.R., Rafieian-Kopaei M. Mechanistic Impacts of Medicinal Plants in Diabetic Kidney Disease. Iran. J. Public Health. 2014;43:1311–1313. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Borges N.A., Carmo F.L., Stockler-Pinto M.B., de Brito J.S., Dolenga C.J., Ferreira D.C., Nakao L.S., Rosado A., Fouque D., Mafra D. Probiotic Supplementation in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial. J. Ren. Nutr. 2018;28:28–36. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2017.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Tejero-Sarinena S., Barlow J., Costabile A., Gibson G.R., Rowland I. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a range of probiotics against pathogens: Evidence for the effects of organic acids. Anaerobe. 2012;18:530–538. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Oksaharju A., Kooistra T., Kleemann R., van Duyvenvoorde W., Miettinen M., Lappalainen J., Lindstedt K.A., Kovanen P.T., Korpela R., Kekkonen R.A. Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS supplementation on intestinal and systemic markers of inflammation in ApoE*3Leiden mice consuming a high-fat diet. Br. J. Nutr. 2013;110:77–85. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512004801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Khalili L., Alipour B., Asghari Jafar-Abadi M., Faraji I., Hassanalilou T., Mesgari Abbasi M., Vaghef-Mehrabany E., Alizadeh Sani M. The Effects of Lactobacillus casei on Glycemic Response, Serum Sirtuin1 and Fetuin-A Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Iran. Biomed. J. 2019;23:68–77. doi: 10.29252/ibj.23.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Firouzi S., Mohd-Yusof B.N., Majid H.A., Ismail A., Kamaruddin N.A. Effect of microbial cell preparation on renal profile and liver function among type 2 diabetics: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015;15:433. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0952-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Vaziri N.D. CKD impairs barrier function and alters microbial flora of the intestine: A major link to inflammation and uremic toxicity. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2012;21:587–592. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e328358c8d5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Kijmanawat A., Panburana P., Reutrakul S., Tangshewinsirikul C. Effects of probiotic supplements on insulin resistance in gestational diabetes mellitus: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. J. Diabetes Investig. 2019;10:163–170. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.De Brito Alves J.L., de Sousa V.P., Cavalcanti Neto M.P., Magnani M., Braga V.A., da Costa-Silva J.H., Leandro C.G., Vidal H., Pirola L. New Insights on the Use of Dietary Polyphenols or Probiotics for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. Front. Physiol. 2016;7:448. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Tanida M., Yamano T., Maeda K., Okumura N., Fukushima Y., Nagai K. Effects of intraduodenal injection of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 on renal sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure in urethane-anesthetized rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2005;389:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Grassi G., Mark A., Esler M. The sympathetic nervous system alterations in human hypertension. Circ. Res. 2015;116:976–990. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Rovella V., Scimeca M., Giannini E., D’Ercole A., Giacobbi E., Noce A., D’Urso G., Anselmo A., Bove P., Santeusanio G., et al. Morphological evaluation of sympathetic renal innervation in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J. Nephrol. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s40620-019-00612-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Gomez-Guzman M., Toral M., Romero M., Jimenez R., Galindo P., Sanchez M., Zarzuelo M.J., Olivares M., Galvez J., Duarte J. Antihypertensive effects of probiotics Lactobacillus strains in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015;59:2326–2336. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201500290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Singh M.V., Cicha M.Z., Nunez S., Meyerholz D.K., Chapleau M.W., Abboud F.M. Angiotensin II-induced hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy are differentially mediated by TLR3- and TLR4-dependent pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2019;316:H1027–H1038. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00697.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ahren I.L., Xu J., Onning G., Olsson C., Ahrne S., Molin G. Antihypertensive activity of blueberries fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 15313 and effects on the gut microbiota in healthy rats. Clin. Nutr. 2015;34:719–726. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Tuomilehto J., Lindstrom J., Hyyrynen J., Korpela R., Karhunen M.L., Mikkola L., Jauhiainen T., Seppo L., Nissinen A. Effect of ingesting sour milk fermented using Lactobacillus helveticus bacteria producing tripeptides on blood pressure in subjects with mild hypertension. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2004;18:795–802. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Ninomiya T., Perkovic V., Turnbull F., Neal B., Barzi F., Cass A., Baigent C., Chalmers J., Li N., et al. Blood pressure lowering and major cardiovascular events in people with and without chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f5680. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Aoyagi Y., Park S., Matsubara S., Honda Y., Amamoto R., Kushiro A., Miyazaki K., Shephard R.J. Habitual intake of fermented milk products containing Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota and a reduced risk of hypertension in older people. Benef. Microbes. 2017;8:23–29. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Furushiro M., Hashimoto S., Hamura M., Yokokura T. Mechanism for the antihypertensive effect of a polysaccharide-glycopeptide complex from Lactobacillus casei in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1993;57:978–981. doi: 10.1271/bbb.57.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Gibson G.R., Roberfroid M.B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr. 1995;125:1401–1412. doi: 10.1093/jn/125.6.1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Hutkins R.W., Krumbeck J.A., Bindels L.B., Cani P.D., Fahey G., Jr., Goh Y.J., Hamaker B., Martens E.C., Mills D.A., Rastal R.A., et al. Prebiotics: Why definitions matter. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016;37:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Pineiro M., Asp N.G., Reid G., Macfarlane S., Morelli L., Brunser O., Tuohy K. FAO Technical meeting on prebiotics. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008;42:S156–S159. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31817f184e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Slavin J. Fiber and prebiotics: Mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients. 2013;5:1417–1435. doi: 10.3390/nu5041417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.De Lorenzo A., Noce A., Bigioni M., Calabrese V., Della Rocca D.G., Di Daniele N., Tozzo C., Di Renzo L. The effects of Italian Mediterranean organic diet (IMOD) on health status. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010;16:814–824. doi: 10.2174/138161210790883561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Di Daniele N., Di Renzo L., Noce A., Iacopino L., Ferraro P.M., Rizzo M., Sarlo F., Domino E., De Lorenzo A. Effects of Italian Mediterranean organic diet vs. low-protein diet in nephropathic patients according to MTHFR genotypes. J. Nephrol. 2014;27:529–536. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0067-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Ramos C.I., Armani R.G., Canziani M.E.F., Dalboni M.A., Dolenga C.J.R., Nakao L.S., Campbell K.L., Cuppari L. Effect of prebiotic (fructooligosaccharide) on uremic toxins of chronic kidney disease patients: A randomized controlled trial. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Dou L., Sallee M., Cerini C., Poitevin S., Gondouin B., Jourde-Chiche N., Fallague K., Brunet P., Calaf R., Dussol B., et al. The cardiovascular effect of the uremic solute indole-3 acetic acid. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015;26:876–887. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013121283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Vanholder R., Abou-Deif O., Argiles A., Baurmeister U., Beige J., Brouckaert P., Brunet P., Cohen G., De Deyn P.P., Drueke T.B., et al. The role of EUTox in uremic toxin research. Semin. Dial. 2009;22:323–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Noce A., Ferrannini M., Fabrini R., Bocedi A., Dessi M., Galli F., Federici G., Palumbo R., Di Daniele N., Ricci G. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase: A new biomarker for hemodialysis adequacy, overcoming the Kt/V(urea) dogma? Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e377. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Poesen R., Evenepoel P., de Loor H., Delcour J.A., Courtin C.M., Kuypers D., Augustijns P., Verbeke K., Meijers B. The Influence of Prebiotic Arabinoxylan Oligosaccharides on Microbiota Derived Uremic Retention Solutes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0153893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Everard A., Lazarevic V., Derrien M., Girard M., Muccioli G.G., Neyrinck A.M., Possemiers S., Van Holle A., Francois P., de Vos W.M., et al. Responses of gut microbiota and glucose and lipid metabolism to prebiotics in genetic obese and diet-induced leptin-resistant mice. Diabetes. 2011;60:2775–2786. doi: 10.2337/db11-0227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Dinarello C.A. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood. 2011;117:3720–3732. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-273417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Bodinham C.L., Smith L., Thomas E.L., Bell J.D., Swann J.R., Costabile A., Russell-Jones D., Umpleby A.M., Robertson M.D. Efficacy of increased resistant starch consumption in human type 2 diabetes. Endocr. Connect. 2014;3:75–84. doi: 10.1530/EC-14-0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Aliasgharzadeh A., Dehghan P., Gargari B.P., Asghari-Jafarabadi M. Resistant dextrin, as a prebiotic, improves insulin resistance and inflammation in women with type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2015;113:321–330. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514003675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Lefranc-Millot C., Guerin-Deremaux L., Wils D., Neut C., Miller L.E., Saniez-Degrave M.H. Impact of a resistant dextrin on intestinal ecology: How altering the digestive ecosystem with NUTRIOSE(R), a soluble fibre with prebiotic properties, may be beneficial for health. J. Int. Med. Res. 2012;40:211–224. doi: 10.1177/147323001204000122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Marques F.Z., Nelson E., Chu P.Y., Horlock D., Fiedler A., Ziemann M., Tan J.K., Kuruppu S., Rajapakse N.W., El-Osta A., et al. High-Fiber Diet and Acetate Supplementation Change the Gut Microbiota and Prevent the Development of Hypertension and Heart Failure in Hypertensive Mice. Circulation. 2017;135:964–977. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Noce A., Vidiri M.F., Marrone G., Moriconi E., Bocedi A., Capria A., Rovella V., Ricci G., De Lorenzo A., Di Daniele N. Is low-protein diet a possible risk factor of malnutrition in chronic kidney disease patients? Cell Death Discov. 2016;2:16026. doi: 10.1038/cddiscovery.2016.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Cupisti A., Brunori G., Di Iorio B.R., D’Alessandro C., Pasticci F., Cosola C., Bellizzi V., Bolasco P., Capitanini A., Fantuzzi A.L., et al. Nutritional treatment of advanced CKD: Twenty consensus statements. J. Nephrol. 2018;31:457–473. doi: 10.1007/s40620-018-0497-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Younes H., Egret N., Hadj-Abdelkader M., Remesy C., Demigne C., Gueret C., Deteix P., Alphonse J.C. Fermentable carbohydrate supplementation alters nitrogen excretion in chronic renal failure. J. Ren. Nutr. 2006;16:67–74. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Meijers B.K., De Preter V., Verbeke K., Vanrenterghem Y., Evenepoel P. p-Cresyl sulfate serum concentrations in haemodialysis patients are reduced by the prebiotic oligofructose-enriched inulin. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010;25:219–224. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Sirich T.L., Plummer N.S., Gardner C.D., Hostetter T.H., Meyer T.W. Effect of increasing dietary fiber on plasma levels of colon-derived solutes in hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014;9:1603–1610. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00490114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Dehghan P., Pourghassem Gargari B., Asghari Jafar-abadi M. Oligofructose-enriched inulin improves some inflammatory markers and metabolic endotoxemia in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Nutrition. 2014;30:418–423. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Andreoli A., Lauro S., Di Daniele N., Sorge R., Celi M., Volpe S.L. Effect of a moderately hypoenergetic Mediterranean diet and exercise program on body cell mass and cardiovascular risk factors in obese women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;62:892–897. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Yang J.Y., Lee Y.S., Kim Y., Lee S.H., Ryu S., Fukuda S., Hase K., Yang C.S., Lim H.S., Kim M.S., et al. Gut commensal Bacteroides acidifaciens prevents obesity and improves insulin sensitivity in mice. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10:104–116. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Xiao S., Fei N., Pang X., Shen J., Wang L., Zhang B., Zhang M., Zhang X., Zhang C., Li M., et al. A gut microbiota-targeted dietary intervention for amelioration of chronic inflammation underlying metabolic syndrome. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014;87:357–367. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Rault-Nania M.H., Demougeot C., Gueux E., Berthelot A., Dzimira S., Rayssiguier Y., Rock E., Mazur A. Inulin supplementation prevents high fructose diet-induced hypertension in rats. Clin. Nutr. 2008;27:276–282. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Hsu C.N., Lin Y.J., Hou C.Y., Tain Y.L. Maternal Administration of Probiotic or Prebiotic Prevents Male Adult Rat Offspring against Developmental Programming of Hypertension Induced by High Fructose Consumption in Pregnancy and Lactation. Nutrients. 2018;10:1229. doi: 10.3390/nu10091229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Pena A.S. Intestinal flora, probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics and novel foods. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2007;99:653–658. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082007001100006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Pandey K.R., Naik S.R., Vakil B.V. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics—A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;52:7577–7587. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1921-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Eslamparast T., Zamani F., Hekmatdoost A., Sharafkhah M., Eghtesad S., Malekzadeh R., Poustchi H. Effects of synbiotic supplementation on insulin resistance in subjects with the metabolic syndrome: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Br. J. Nutr. 2014;112:438–445. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Ahmadi S., Jamilian M., Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M., Jafari P., Asemi Z. The effects of synbiotic supplementation on markers of insulin metabolism and lipid profiles in gestational diabetes: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2016;116:1394–1401. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516003457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Pavan M. Influence of prebiotic and probiotic supplementation on the progression of chronic kidney disease. Minerva Urol. Nefrol. 2016;68:222–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Guida B., Cataldi M., Memoli A., Trio R., di Maro M., Grumetto L., Capuano I., Federico S., Pisani A., Sabbatini M. Effect of a Short-Course Treatment with Synbiotics on Plasma p-Cresol Concentration in Kidney Transplant Recipients. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2017;36:586–591. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2017.1334602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Viramontes-Horner D., Marquez-Sandoval F., Martin-del-Campo F., Vizmanos-Lamotte B., Sandoval-Rodriguez A., Armendariz-Borunda J., Garcia-Bejarano H., Renoirte-Lopez K., Garcia-Garcia G. Effect of a symbiotic gel (Lactobacillus acidophilus + Bifidobacterium lactis + inulin) on presence and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms in hemodialysis patients. J. Ren. Nutr. 2015;25:284–291. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Avolio E., Gualtieri P., Romano L., Pecorella C., Ferraro S., Di Renzo L., De Lorenzo A. Obesity and body composition in man and woman: Associated diseases and new role of gut microbiota. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019;26 doi: 10.2174/0929867326666190326113607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Cicenia A., Scirocco A., Carabotti M., Pallotta L., Marignani M., Severi C. Postbiotic activities of lactobacilli-derived factors. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2014;48(Suppl. 1):S18–S22. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Konstantinov S.R., Kuipers E.J., Peppelenbosch M.P. Functional genomic analyses of the gut microbiota for CRC screening. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013;10:741–745. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Shenderov B.A. Metabiotics: Novel idea or natural development of probiotic conception. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2013;24:20399. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v24i0.20399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Cosola C., Rocchetti M.T., Cupisti A., Gesualdo L. Microbiota metabolites: Pivotal players of cardiovascular damage in chronic kidney disease. Pharmacol. Res. 2018;130:132–142. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Kareem K.Y., Hooi Ling F., Teck Chwen L., May Foong O., Anjas Asmara S. Inhibitory activity of postbiotic produced by strains of Lactobacillus plantarum using reconstituted media supplemented with inulin. Gut Pathog. 2014;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-6-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Kareem K.Y., Loh T.C., Foo H.L., Asmara S.A., Akit H. Influence of postbiotic RG14 and inulin combination on cecal microbiota, organic acid concentration, and cytokine expression in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:966–975. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Sokol H., Pigneur B., Watterlot L., Lakhdari O., Bermudez-Humaran L.G., Gratadoux J.J., Blugeon S., Bridonneau C., Furet J.P., Corthier G., et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:16731–16736. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804812105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Cavallari J.F., Fullerton M.D., Duggan B.M., Foley K.P., Denou E., Smith B.K., Desjardins E.M., Henriksbo B.D., Kim K.J., Tuinema B.R., et al. Muramyl Dipeptide-Based Postbiotics Mitigate Obesity-Induced Insulin Resistance via IRF4. Cell Metab. 2017;25:1063–1074.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Tsilingiri K., Barbosa T., Penna G., Caprioli F., Sonzogni A., Viale G., Rescigno M. Probiotic and postbiotic activity in health and disease: Comparison on a novel polarised ex-vivo organ culture model. Gut. 2012;61:1007–1015. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Smits L.P., Bouter K.E., de Vos W.M., Borody T.J., Nieuwdorp M. Therapeutic potential of fecal microbiota transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:946–953. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Gough E., Shaikh H., Manges A.R. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011;53:994–1002. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Kelly B.J., Tebas P. Clinical Practice and Infrastructure Review of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridium difficile Infection. Chest. 2018;153:266–277. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Borody T.J., Khoruts A. Fecal microbiota transplantation and emerging applications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011;9:88–96. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Kassam Z., Lee C.H., Yuan Y., Hunt R.H. Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013;108:500–508. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Kelly C.R., Kahn S., Kashyap P., Laine L., Rubin D., Atreja A., Moore T., Wu G. Update on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation 2015: Indications, Methodologies, Mechanisms, and Outlook. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:223–237. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Choi H.H., Cho Y.S. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Current Applications, Effectiveness, and Future Perspectives. Clin. Endosc. 2016;49:257–265. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Sadowsky M.J., Khoruts A. Faecal microbiota transplantation is promising but not a panacea. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;1:16015. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Vrieze A., Van Nood E., Holleman F., Salojarvi J., Kootte R.S., Bartelsman J.F., Dallinga-Thie G.M., Ackermans M.T., Serlie M.J., Oozeer R., et al. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:913–916.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Yoo J.Y., Kim S.S. Probiotics and Prebiotics: Present Status and Future Perspectives on Metabolic Disorders. Nutrients. 2016;8:173. doi: 10.3390/nu8030173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]