Skip to main content
BMC Veterinary Research logoLink to BMC Veterinary Research
. 2019 Jun 13;15:200. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1952-3

Detection and genetic characteristics of porcine circovirus 3 based on oral fluids from asymptomatic pigs in central China

Zhenhua Guo 1,#, Xiang Li 4,#, Ruiguang Deng 1, Gaiping Zhang 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC6567530  PMID: 31196107

Abstract

Background

Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) is an emerging etiological agent to the swine industry. However, its circulating status and genetic characteristics were still unclear in Henan, central China. Here, 318 porcine oral fluid specimens were collected from asymptomatic pigs in five farms and tested by PCR .

Results

The results showed that the positive rate of PCV3 was 12.3% (39/318) for the total samples, and 15.06% (25/166) in the stall-based samples, 9.21% (14/152) in the pen-based samples. Of the PCV3-positive samples, 41.0% were also positive for porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2). Nucleotide sequence comparison indicated that the 10 complete genomes and 34 capsid (cap) genes in this study shared 98.7–99.9% and 98–100% pairwise identities to each other, respectively. According to phylogenetic analysis and sequence alignment of cap gene, all the isolated sequences were clustered into 3 clades, including subgroup 1 (21/39, 61.8%), subgroup 2 (5/39, 14.7%) and subgroup 3 (8/39, 23.5%). Similar to previous reports, four amino acids (V24A, K27R, S77 T and I150L) in cap protein were identified as a conserved subgroup specific molecular marker.

Conclusion

Our research provided new insights into the epidemiology surveillance and genetic characteristics of PCV3 in China.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1952-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: PCV3, Epidemiology, Oral fluids, Phylogenetic analysis

Background

Circoviridae family have covalently closed, circular, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genomes and are classified into two genera: Circovirus and Cyclovirus [1]. Two members of the circovirus genus, PCV type 1 (PCV1) and PCV type 2 (PCV2), have been recognized as infectious agents to pigs. PCV1 was first detected as a contaminant of PK-15 cell cultures and has not been associated with clinical disease [2]. However, PCV2 is a ubiquitous economically pathogen to the swine industry. PCV2 infection leads to a diverse range of clinical diseases collectively termed PCV2-associated disease (PCVAD), which includes post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome (PMWS), porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS), interstitial pneumonia, enteric disease and reproductive failure [3].

Recently, a novel porcine circovirus, designated as porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3), was first identified from a case of porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS) and reproductive failure in USA in 2015 [4, 5]. The genome size of PCV3 is ~ 2000 nucleotides (nt), which is considerably longer than PCV1 (~ 1760 nt) and PCV2 (~ 1780 nt), respectively [6]. Currently, PCV3 has been reported in several countries such as China, South Korea, Thailand, Poland, Italy, and Brazil, accompanying with widely geographical distribution [712]. Many studies have shown that PCV3 was probably a potential pathogen which was related with several clinical diseases, including PDNS, reproductive disorders and multi-systemic inflammation [4, 5, 13] .

In China, PCV3 has been confirmed to be present in more than 20 provinces and regions [8, 14, 15]. However, the prevalence of PCV3 in pig farms (especially in asymptomatic herds) is still not well established and the genetic information of PCV3 is still poor in central China. The aim of this study was to determine the infection status and genetic characteristics of PCV3 in asymptomatic pigs using pen-based and stall-based oral fluid samples in Henan, central China.

Results

The detection result of PCV3 based on oral fluids

Of the total 318 oral fluid samples, 12.3% (39/318) were positive for PCV3 DNA, and 15.06% (25/166) in the stall-based samples from sows, 9.21% (14/152) in the pen-based samples from commercial pigs. For individual farm, the detection rates of PCV3 were ranged from 4.0%~ 20.0% (Table 1). Furthermore, we also addressed the co-infection status of PCV2 with PCV3. Of the 39 PCV3-positive samples, 16 samples (~ 41.0%) were also positive for PCV2. Besides, our data showed that there was a higher infection rate of PCV3 in sows (15.06%) compared with that in commercial pigs (9.21%), and the prevalence of PCV3 is common in pig farms, even if there are no obvious clinical signs.

Table 1.

Sample information and the detection result of PCV3

Farm Herd size (Sows) Sample size Detection rate of PCV3
Sows (Stall-based) Commercial pigs (Pen-based) Sows Commercial pigs Total
A 600 33 27 24.24% (8/33) 14.81% (4/27) 20.0% (12/60)
B 900 35 28 11.43% (4/35) 7.14% (2/28) 9.5% (6/63)
C 300 20 34 20% (4/20) 14.71% (5/34) 16.7% (9/54)
D 400 36 30 16.67% (6/36) 10% (3/30) 13.6% (9/66)
E 1000 42 33 7.14% (3/42) 0% (0/33) 4.0% (3/75)
Total 3200 166 152 15.06% (25/166) 9.21% (14/152) 12.3% (39/318)

Sequence analysis

To further analyze the sequences of PCV3 variants, the nucleotide sequences of 10 complete (2000 nts) genomes (GenBank accession numbers: MH184533-MH184542) and 34 complete cap (645 nts) genes (GenBank accession numbers: MH184533-MH184566) were sequenced and analyzed (Additional file 1: Table S1). The sequence identities of whole genome and cap gene in this study were 98.7%~ 99.9% (nt) and 98%~ 100% (nt) (96.7%~ 100%, aa), respectively. Besides, early isolates or representative strains of PCV1, PCV2 and PCV3 were chose for further analysis. These new strains showed a high identity with the American PCV3 reference strains (GenBank ID: KX778720, KX966193) and the similarity was 98.7%~ 99.5% (nt) for complete genome and 98.0%~ 99.8% (nt) (98.1%~ 100%, aa) for cap gene, respectively. However, they only shared 45.3%~ 45.5% genomic nucleotide identity with PCV1 reference strains (GenBank ID: KJ408798, DQ650650) and 46.0%~ 46.8% identity with PCV2 reference strains (GenBank ID: EU148503, AF055394, FJ870968), respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

The homological analysis between different strains

Isolated strains in this study Each other PCV3 reference strain (KX778720, KX966193) PCV1 reference strain (KJ408798, DQ650650) PCV2 reference strain (FJ870968, AF055394, EU148503)
Complete genome (nt) 98.7%~ 99.9% 98.7%~ 99.5% 45.3%~ 45.5% 46.0%~ 46.8%
Cap gene (nt/aa) 98.0%~ 100%/ 98.0%~ 99.8%/ 44.0%~ 44.8%/ 43.7%~ 45.1%/
96.7%~ 100% 98.1%~ 100% 23.0%~ 25.4% 25.9%~ 26.4%

Phylogenetic analysis and sequence alignment

To investigate the evolutionary relationship of PCV3 in China, a total of 73 complete genomes (10 obtained from this study and 63 downloaded from GenBank) and 89 cap gene sequences (34 sequences from this study and 55 sequences from GenBank) were analyzed using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA6.0 software. Based on the complete genome sequences, all the PCV3 were clustered into a same but separate evolutionary branch, which were distantly related to PCV1 and PCV2 species (Fig. 1a). The phylogenetic tree based on the full-length cap gene showed that all the 89 PCV3 strains could be divided into three subgroups-subgroup 1, subgroup 2 and subgroup 3 (Fig. 1b). Among the 34 PCV3 sequences obtained presently, 61.8% (21/34) sequences were clustered into subgroup 1, 14.7% (5/34) belonged to subgroup 2 and 23.5% (8/34) belonged to subgroup 3. Sequence alignment based on the cap protein showed that the different subgroups possess different amino acid patterns at position 24th, 27th, 77th and 150th (Figs. 1b and 2). Concisely, subgroup 1 contains a combination of 24 V, 27 K, 77S and 150I. Subgroup 2 contains 24A, 27R, 77 T and 150 L. While subgroup 3 contains 24A, 27R, 77S (or T/N) and 150I (or N/L). Further investigations need to be done to determine whether these four amino acids variation were related to pathogenicity or antigenicity of different PCV3 subgroups.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic analysis based on the complete genome and the cap gene. a Phylogenetic tree of the complete genome of different porcine circoviruses. All PCV3 strains cluster together independently with PCV1 and PCV2 species. b Phylogenetic tree and amino acids alignment based on the cap gene of 89 viruses. All the PCV3 strains clustered three subgroups, subgroup 1, subgroup 2 and subgroup 3. The special amino acid patterns for each subgroup were also showed. The black solid circles (●) represent the PCV3 viruses investigated in this study. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method in MEGA 6.0 software with a bootstrap test of 1000 replicates. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The sequence alignment based on amino acids of capsid protein. 34 PCV3 strains isolated in this study and 3 reference strains were aligned by clustal W method in MEGA6.0 software. All the isolates were cluster into three subgroups, subgroup 1 (green), subgroup 2 (blue), subgroup 3 (yellow). The potential genetic marker were showed in the black rectangles

Discussion

PCV3 was first identified as a potential etiologic agent to swine in the America in 2015 [4, 5]. Since then, several countries (China, South Korea, Thailand, Poland, Italy, Brazil, etc.) have reported the prevalence of PCV3 [712, 14]. The retrospective studies showed that the PCV3 were detected in pigs as early as in 1993 in Sweden and 1996 in China and Spain, respectively. It suggests that PCV3 has been circulating in pigs more than 20 years [16, 17].

Based on the detection using anti-PCV3 capsid antibodies, Rachel Palinski et al. reported a 55% positive rate of serum samples in USA, Junhua Deng et al. showed a 29.63%~ 61.67% positive rate based on serum samples collected from 15 provinces/regions in China. These studies indicated that PCV3 is commonly circulated in the pig farms with a high infection rate. In our study, The PCV3 positive rates range from 4 to 20% for individual pig farm and the sows showed a higher detection rate of PCV3 (15.06%) than finishing pigs (9.21%). The total detection rate of PCV3 (12.3%) was lower than that in previous reports in China, a positive rate of 34.7 and 21.9%~ 31.1% [8, 15], respectively. This is probably caused by the discrepancy of sample sources and types. For most previous studies, the samples were serums and tissues (lung, lymph node, tonsil, kidney, etc.) collected from diseased pigs, while the samples we used were oral fluids collected from the asymptomatic pig farms. Furthermore, we confirmed that the co-infection rate with PCV2 was 41.0%, which was similar with previous studies.

Homological analysis indicated that the genome of PCV3 isolates had a high identity (98.7%~ 99.9%) with each other. Based on the phylogenetic analysis and sequence alignment of cap gene sequences, all the isolates could be classified into subgroup 1, subgroup 2 and subgroup 3. Besides, similar to previous researches, four amino acid variations (V24A, K27R, S77 T and I150L) in cap protein could be used as a molecular marker for different PCV3 clade divisions. In fact, several studies have discussed the genotyping of PCV3 strains. Robert et al. (2018) thought there are at least two separate groups of PCV3 strains and they also provided the amino acid marker positions in ORF1 and 2 of PCV3 strains [18]. X. Ku et al. (2016) considered there are two clusters of PCV3 based on the phylogenetic analysis of partial capsid gene [8]. X. Fu et al. (2017) divided PCV3 into three clades (PCV3a, PCV3b and PCV3c) based on two amino acid mutations (A24V and R27K) on the cap protein [15]. As a newly found circovirus species, there was still no standardized nomenclature for PCV3 genotype definition. Along with the increase of PCV3 sequence information, the researchers may be confused by different classifications of PCV3. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the definite nomenclature of PCV3 genotypes by specialist groups.

PCV3 has been reported to be related with PDNS, reproductive disorders, congenital tremors, and multi-systemic inflammations in pigs [4, 5, 19]. Recent studies showed that there were a high detection rate of PCV3 in weaned pig with severe respiratory disease or diarrhea disease and the PCV3 strains are associated with both digestive and respiratory diseases in swine [6, 20]. However, there was also report which indicated that the positive PCV3 rate in healthy pigs was higher (29.8%) than that in unhealthy pigs (17.9%) [21]. Combined with our research, it suggested that the pigs could live with PCV3 infection without any clinical signs. Thus, The PCV3 maybe as a co-pathogenic factor with other pathogens such as PCV2, porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). It is imperative to isolate PCV3 on cell lines and further investigations into the pathogenesis are needed to ascertain the role of PCV3 in swine health [13, 22].

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study suggested that the oral fluids could be useful to monitor the prevalent status of PCV3 in swine herds due to broad sampling ranges. PCV3 is widely circulating in pigs in Henan province, central China. Subgroup specific amino acids (V27A, K27R, S77 T and I150L) in cap protein should be helpful for further clustering of PCV3. Our study enriched the genetic information and provided new insights into the molecular characteristics of PCV3.

Methods

Sample collection and pre-treatment

A total of 318 oral fluid samples (pen-based consist of 20~ 25 pigs and stall-based for individual sow) were collected from five large-scale pig farms in Henan, China. All the pig farms were commercial farrow-to-finisher farms with 300 to 1000 sows and carried out batch production system. The sampled pigs were clinically healthy with a good production performance and normal feed intake. No obvious clinical symptoms, including returns to oestrus or abortion for sows and cough, panting or diarrhea for fatten pigs, were observed. Oral fluids were collected as previous study [13]. Briefly, a 1.2 m length and 1.5 cm diameter cotton rope was suspended within the pen or stall. Pigs chewed on the rope for 30~40 min until drenched enough. The oral fluids were then obtained by squeezing the moistened rope in a plastic bag and cutting one corner of the bag to drain the fluid into a 2 mL EP tubes. Then samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min to separate any debris. All supernatants were aliquoted and stored at − 80 °C for further studies.

DNA extraction and PCR

Viral DNA was extracted from each sample using TaKaRa MiniBEST Viral RNA/DNA Extraction Kit Ver.5.0 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used in this study were listed in Table 3. Briefly, a pair of primer to generate a 330-bp products was used to detect the PCV3 cap gene from each sample as previously described [5]. Five pairs of primers were used for the complete genome and cap gene sequencing by a nested PCR method. The detection primers of PCV2 were designed according to the cap genes. For the PCR reaction, PrimeSTAR Max DNA Polymerase was purchased from TaKaRa and the reaction conditions were as follows: one cycle at 98 °C for 2 min; 30 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 30 s or 45 s according to the products length, followed by elongation at 72 °C for 5 min and hold at 16 °C. The PCR products were visualized by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis and ultraviolet light.

Table 3.

Primers used in this study

Primer name Nucleotide Sequence Primer location (nt) Product length (bp) Purpose Resource
PCV3-D-F CCACAGAAGGCGCTATGTC 1909–1927 a 330 Detection [4]
PCV3-D-R CCGCATAAGGGTCGTCTTG 1599–1617 a
PCV3-N2-F AGGAGGTTCACTAAGGTTGT 1026–1045 a 1313 Genome sequencing (nested PCR For G2 fragment) This study
PCV3-N2-R CTCTTTGCCGATAATAAGGTAT 317–338 a
PCV3-G2-F TTGCACTTGTGTACAATTATTGCG 1113–1136 a 1075 [3]
PCV3-G2-R ATCTTCAGGACACTCGTAGCACCAC 2163–0-187 a
PCV3-G1-F TAGTATTACCCGGCACCTCGGAACC 1994-0-18 a 1257 Genome sequencing (nested PCR For N1 fragment) [3]
PCV3-G1-R ACAGGTAAACGCCCTCGCATGTGGG 1226–1250 a
PCV3-N1-F GATGAAGCGGCCTCGTGT 106–123 a 1064 This study
PCV3-N1-R CACCCACCCTCCCAATAA 1152–1169 a
PCV3-Cap-F ATGAGACACAGAGCTATATT 1961–1980 a 645 Cap gene sequencing This study
PCV3-Cap-R TTAGAGAACGGACTTGTAAC 1336–1355 a
PCV2-F AAGGGCTGGGTTATGGTATG 1621–1640 b 353 Detection This study
PCV2-R CGCTGGAGAAGGAAAAATGG 187–206 b

Numbers correspond to positions within the PCV3 strain KY418606 a and PCV2 strain AF055394 b

Cloning and sequencing

The PCR products were purified by E.Z.N.A.® Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc.) and then cloned into pMD20-T vector (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). At least three positive clones were submitted to Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) for sequencing.

Homological and phylogenetic analysis

The 55 complete genome sequences of PCV3 available in NCBI and some reference strains of PCV1 and PCV2 were downloaded for further analysis (Additional file 1: Table S1). Nucleotide alignment and deduced amino acid (aa) sequences (for cap gene) were performed by clustal W method using the DNASTAR software. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the neighbor-joining method with the Kimura 2-parameter model in MEGA6.0 software with bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates [23] .

Additional file

Additional file 1: (86KB, doc)

Table S1. Sequence information in this study. (DOC 89 kb)

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Xin-xin Chen for carefully revising the manuscript.

Abbreviations

A

Alanine

AA

Amino acid

Cap

Capsid protein

I

Isoleucine

K

Lysine

L

Leucine

Nt

Nucleotide

PCV

Porcine circovirus

PCVAD

PCV2-associated disease

PDNS

Porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome

PEDV

Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus

PMWS

Post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome

PRRSV

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

R

Arginine

S

Serine

ssDNA

Single-stranded DNA

T

Threonine

V

Valine

Authors’ contributions

ZG and GZ conceived and designed the experiments. ZG and XL performed the experiments. RD contributed data analysis. ZG wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0501102), China Agriculture Research System (No.CARS-35). The funders had no role in study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. No specific permissions were required for the collection of samples. All sampling and publication of the data were approved by the farm owners.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Zhenhua Guo and Xiang Li contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Rosario K, Breitbart M, Harrach B, Segalés J, Delwart E, Biagini P, Varsani A. Revisiting the taxonomy of the family Circoviridae: establishment of the genus Cyclovirus and removal of the genus Gyrovirus. Arch Virol. 2017;162(5):1447–1463. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3247-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tischer I, Rasch R, Tochtermann G. Characterization of papovavirus-and picornavirus-like particles in permanent pig kidney cell lines. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1974;226(2):153–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ssemadaali MA, Ilha M, Ramamoorthy S. Genetic diversity of porcine circovirus type 2 and implications for detection and control. Res Vet Sci. 2015;103:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Phan TG, Giannitti F, Rossow S, Marthaler D, Knutson TP, Li L, Deng X, Resende T, Vannucci F, Delwart E. Detection of a novel circovirus PCV3 in pigs with cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation. Virol J. 2016;13(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12985-016-0642-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Palinski R, Piñeyro P, Shang P, Yuan F, Guo R, Fang Y, Byers E, Hause BM, McFadden G. A novel porcine circovirus distantly related to known circoviruses is associated with porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome and reproductive failure. J Virol. 2017;91(1):e01879–e01816. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01879-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhai S-L, Zhou X, Zhang H, Hause BM, Lin T, Liu R, Chen Q-L, Wei W-K, Lv D-H, Wen X-H, et al. Comparative epidemiology of porcine circovirus type 3 in pigs with different clinical presentations. Virol J. 2017;14(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12985-017-0892-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Faccini S, Barbieri I, Gilioli A, Sala G, Gibelli LR, Moreno A, Sacchi C, Rosignoli C, Franzini G, Nigrelli A. Detection and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 in Italy. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(6):1661–1664. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ku X, Chen F, Li P, Wang Y, Yu X, Fan S, Qian P, Wu M, He Q. Identification and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 in China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(3):703–708. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kwon T, Yoo SJ, Park C-K, Lyoo YS. Prevalence of novel porcine circovirus 3 in Korean pig populations. Vet Microbiol. 2017;207:178–180. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stadejek T, Woźniak A, Miłek D, Biernacka K. First detection of porcine circovirus type 3 on commercial pig farms in Poland. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(5):1350–1353. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kedkovid R, Woonwong Y, Arunorat J, Sirisereewan C, Sangpratum N, Lumyai M, Kesdangsakonwut S, Teankum K, Jittimanee S, Thanawongnuwech R. Porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) infection in grower pigs from a Thai farm suffering from porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) Vet Microbiol. 2018;215:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tochetto C, Lima DA, Varela APM, Loiko MR, Paim WP, Scheffer CM, Herpich JI, Cerva C, Schmitd C, Cibulski SP, et al. Full-genome sequence of porcine circovirus type 3 recovered from serum of sows with stillbirths in Brazil. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(1):5–9. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rotolo ML, Sun Y, Wang C, Gimenez-Lirola L, Baum DH, Gauger PC, Harmon KM, Hoogland M, Main R, Zimmerman JJ. Sampling guidelines for oral fluid-based surveys of group-housed animals. Vet Microbiol. 2017;209:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Deng J, Li X, Zheng D, Wang Y, Chen L, Song H, Wang T, Huang Y, Pang W, Tian K. Establishment and application of an indirect ELISA for porcine circovirus 3. Arch Virol. 2017;163(2):479–482. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3607-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fu X, Fang B, Ma J, Liu Y, Bu D, Zhou P, Wang H, Jia K, Zhang G. Insights into the epidemic characteristics and evolutionary history of the novel porcine circovirus type 3 in southern China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(2):e296–e303. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sun J, Wei L, Lu Z, Mi S, Bao F, Guo H, Tu C, Zhu Y, Gong W. Retrospective study of porcine circovirus 3 infection in China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(3):607–613. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ye X, Berg M, Fossum C, Wallgren P, Blomström A-L. Detection and genetic characterisation of porcine circovirus 3 from pigs in Sweden. Virus Genes. 2018;54(3):466–469. doi: 10.1007/s11262-018-1553-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fux R, Sockler C, Link EK, Renken C, Krejci R, Sutter G, Ritzmann M, Eddicks M. Full genome characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 isolates reveals the existence of two distinct groups of virus strains. Virol J. 2018;15(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-0929-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen GH, Mai KJ, Zhou L, Wu RT, Tang XY, Wu JL, He LL, Lan T, Xie QM, Sun Y, et al. Detection and genome sequencing of porcine circovirus 3 in neonatal pigs with congenital tremors in South China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(6):1650–1654. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qi S, Su M, Guo D, Li C, Wei S, Feng L, Sun D. Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 3 in 21 provinces of China during 2015-2017. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66(2):1004–15. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Saraiva G, Vidigal P, Assao V, Fajardo M, Loreto A, Fietto J, Bressan G, Lobato Z, Almeida M, Silva-Júnior A. Retrospective detection and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) strains identified between 2006 and 2007 in Brazil. Viruses. 2019;11(3):201. doi: 10.3390/v11030201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Franzo G, Legnardi M, Tucciarone CM, Drigo M, Klaumann F, Sohrmann M, SegalEs J. Porcine circovirus type 3: a threat to the pig industry? Vet Rec. 2018;182(3):83. doi: 10.1136/vr.k91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1: (86KB, doc)

Table S1. Sequence information in this study. (DOC 89 kb)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES