Skip to main content
The Journal of International Medical Research logoLink to The Journal of International Medical Research
. 2019 May 21;47(6):2764–2767. doi: 10.1177/0300060519848260

Laryngotracheal foreign body: chicken neck bone

Nicolae Constantin Balica 1, Adrian Mihail Sitaru 1, Eugen Radu Boia 1, Delia Ioana Horhat 1,, Ion Cristian Mot 1, Alexandru Chioreanu 1, Marioara Poenaru 1
PMCID: PMC6567700  PMID: 31109227

Short abstract

We herein present a case involving a 78-year-old patient who had aspirated a laryngotracheal foreign body 3 days prior to hospital admission. The patient had severe congenital intellectual disability; however, no agitation, suffocation, or death occurred despite almost complete laryngeal obstruction. The laryngotracheal foreign body was removed by tracheotomy and suspended microlaryngoscopy.

Keywords: Laryngotracheal foreign body, intellectual disability, suspended microlaryngoscopy, tracheotomy, chicken bone, laryngeal obstruction

Introduction

Laryngotracheal foreign body (LTFB) aspiration presents as an emergency, and unless diagnosed and treated promptly, a fatal outcome is almost inevitable.1 The diagnosis of occult LTFB aspiration is complex.2 The symptoms are related to the nature, size, location, and time of aspiration of the LTFB.3 Although less common than bronchial foreign bodies, LTFBs are potentially dangerous.4,5 Studies analyzing adult patients have shown that a normal swallowing reflex protects against foreign body aspiration. Some types of central nervous system dysfunction may increase the risk of foreign body aspiration: stroke, loss of consciousness, metabolic encephalopathy, alcoholism, intellectual disability, neurological and/or psychiatric diseases, seizure disorders, consumption of central depressant drugs, inhibition of the pharyngeal or cough reflex, and other disorders.69 Asphyxia may also develop in some patients.1012

In the present case, a patient with severe congenital intellectual disability exhibited no signs or symptoms of LTFB aspiration. Computed tomography revealed almost complete laryngeal obstruction due to an inanimate LTFB (chicken neck bone).

Laryngeal spasm secondary to foreign body aspiration contributes to the development of asphyxia, and the effort of yelling or swallowing facilitates penetration of the foreign body into the larynx and trachea while the coughing reflex becomes inefficient.13 This case is being reported because the findings could have a great impact on taking the patient’s mental condition into consideration in the presence of severe laryngeal obstruction, helping to prevent progression to agitation, suffocation, and a fatal outcome.

Case presentation

A 78-year-old man with severe congenital intellectual disability (intellectual developmental disorders according to the International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision) presented to the intensive care unit of Timisoara Regional Hospital with possible LTFB aspiration. He did not exhibit the classic penetration syndrome. Clinical examination of the patient revealed mild dysphagia and drooling. Because the patient was unable to provide an accurate anamnesis, a head and neck computed tomography scan was performed (Figure 1) and revealed an LTFB (chicken neck bone). According to the patient’s family, the aspiration had occurred 3 days before. No respiratory signs or symptoms were present (e.g., stridor, intercostal and subcostal retractions, or nasal flaring), and the peripheral capillary oxygen saturation was >95%. We initiated an LTFB extraction procedure with local anesthesia (10% lidocaine), a 70° laryngeal video-endoscope, and laryngeal forceps. Unfortunately, the LTFB was impacted in the glottis, and the patient did not cooperate for the extraction maneuver. Because jet ventilation was not available, we decided to perform a tracheotomy. The LTFB was extracted by suspended microlaryngoscopy under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation (Figure 2). Two days after the surgical procedure, the tracheal tube was removed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Head and neck computed tomography scan.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Laryngotracheal foreign body (chicken neck bone).

This study was approved by the “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Regional Hospital Timisoara, Romania (34/A/08.01.2018). We obtained verbal consent from the patient’s caregiver.

Discussion

Impaction of a foreign body in the larynx in patients of advanced age is a rare occurrence.14 A search of PubMed for “laryngeal foreign body chicken” revealed only six articles, of which only three were related to penetration syndrome. In patients with LTFB aspiration involving complete obstruction, respiratory distress is followed by cardiac arrest. In patients with almost complete obstruction, severe respiratory distress develops with cyanosis or a peripheral capillary oxygen saturation of <90% accompanied by tachycardia and agitation or lethargy. Patients with severe obstruction exhibit stridor at rest and severe respiratory distress (severe intercostal and subcostal retractions, nasal flaring, substernal retractions, and severe tachypnea). In moderate and mild cases, the symptoms and signs are less severe and there are no signs indicating a risk of death. A large foreign body occupying the laryngotracheal region without any symptoms is an even rarer occurrence.15

Careful clinical history-taking and physical examination are mandatory. Foreign bodies located in the laryngeal region are almost always treated with surgery.16 Endoscopic examination of the larynx, trachea, and lungs is used to extract the foreign bodies.17 Early diagnosis and urgent removal of the foreign body are very important for reducing mortality. The physical characteristics, position, and location of the foreign body can influence the outcome, even in skilled hands.18

Conclusions

LTFB aspiration is an emergency, and rapid identification of the LTFB will reduce morbidity and mortality. In patients with severe congenital mental disorders or only mild signs and symptoms, a high index of suspicion for LTFB is necessary. We believe that our patient’s lack of agitation was due to his mental condition and might have evolved to suffocation and a fatal outcome.

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  • 1.Banerjee A, Rao KS, Khanna SK, et al. Laryngo-bronchial-bronchial foreign bodies in children. J Laryngol Otol 1988; 102: 1029–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abdulmajid OA, Ebeid AM, Motaweh MM, et al. Aspirated foreign bodies in the trachea-bronchial tree. A report of 250 cases. Thorax 1976; 31: 635–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Doust BD, Ting YM, Chuang VP. Detection of aspirated foreign bodies with Xeroradiography. Radiology 1974; 111: 725–727. DOI: 10.1148/111.3.725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boufersaoui A, Smati L, Benhalla KN, et al. Foreign body aspiration in children: experience from 2624 patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77: 1683–1688. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zavala DC, Rhodes ML. Foreign body removal: a new role for the fiberoptic bronchoscope. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84: 650–656. DOI: 10.1177/000348947508400516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.He B, Huang Y, Li Q, et al. Diagnosis of children with occult bronchial foreign body. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2014; 52: 851–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berzlanovich MA, Fazeny-Dörner B, Waldhoer D, et al. Foreign body asphyxia. A preventable cause of death in elderly. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28: 65–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kent SE, Watson MG. Laryngeal foreign bodies. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104: 131–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chrcanovic BR, Souza LN. Tracheotomy for a foreign body in the larynx. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 13: 55–58. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-009-0148-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ekberg O, Feinberg M. Clinical and demographic data in 75 patients with near-fatal choking episodes. Disphagia 1992; 7: 205–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dolkas L, Stanley C, Smith AM, et al. Deaths associated with choking in San Diego county. J Forensic Sci 2007; 52: 176–179. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00297.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Njau SN. Adult sudden death caused by aspiration of chewing gum. Forensic Sci Int 2004; 139: 103–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.09.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arbarello P, Di Luca NM, Feola T, et al. Medicina legale. 2nd ed Torino: Minerva Medica Ed, 2005, pp.343–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hada MS, Samdhani S, Chadha V, et al. Laryngeal foreign bodies among adults. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2015; 22: 145–147. DOI: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jain S, Kashikar S, Deshmukh PT, et al. Impacted laryngeal foreign body in a child: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2013; 3: 464–466. DOI: 10.4103/2141-9248.117937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Türk B, Ünsal Ö, Kaya KS, et al. Dislocated dental prothesis sitting at the larynx in an aphasic patient: potentially fatal situation. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28: e655–e657. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Timbo SK, Keita MA, Doumbia-Singare K, et al. Medical handicap and otorhinolaryngologic foreign bodies about 4 original cases. Mali Med 2010; 25: 50–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sazak H, Yazıcı U, Gülgösteren M, et al. Iatrogenic aspiration of a large piece of a wooden spoon in a 14-year-old epilepsy patient. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011; 17: 359–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of International Medical Research are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES