Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for about 10% of all hematologic malignancies. The revised International Myeloma Working Group criteria for the diagnosis of MM and related disorders are shown on Table 1.1 The diagnosis of MM requires the presence of one or more myeloma defining events (MDE) in addition to evidence of either 10% or more clonal plasma cells on bone marrow examination or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma. MDE consists of established CRAB features (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) and 3 specific biomarkers: clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥60%, serum free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC level is ≥100 mg/L), and more than one focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Each of the new biomarkers is associated with an approximately 80% risk of progression to symptomatic end-organ damage in two or more independent studies.
Table 1.
Disorder | Disease Definition |
---|---|
Non-IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) | All 3 criteria must be met:
|
Smoldering MM | Both criteria must be met:
|
MM | Both criteria must be met:
|
IgM Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (IgM MGUS) | All 3 criteria must be met:
|
Light Chain MGUS | All criteria must be met:
|
Solitary Plasmacytoma | All 4 criteria must be met
|
Solitary Plasmacytoma with minimal marrow involvement** | All 4 criteria must be met
|
Reproduced from Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of MM. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e538-e548.
A bone marrow can be deferred in patients with low risk MGUS (IgG type, M protein <15 gm/L, normal free light chain ratio) in whom there are no clinical features concerning for myeloma
Solitary plasmacytoma with 10% or more clonal plasma cells is considered as MM
Although MM is still considered a single disease, it is in reality a collection of several different cytogenetically distinct plasma cell malignancies. Trisomies and IgH translocations are considered primary cytogenetic abnormalities and occur at the time of establishment of MGUS. Other cytogenetic changes termed secondary cytogenetic abnormalities occur disease course such as gain(1q), del(1p), del(17p), del(13), RAS mutations, and secondary translocations involving MYC. The presence of del(17p), gain(1q), t(4;14), t(14;16), and t914;20) are considered to reflect high risk disease.
Survival of MM has improved significantly in the last 15 years.2 There are many active drugs to treat MM in addition to alkylators and corticosteroids. Thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide are termed immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs). Bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib are proteasome inhibitors. Elotuzumab and daratumumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting SLAMF7 and CD38 respectively. Panobinostat is a deacetylase inhibitor.
Numerous regimens have been developed with these new drugs, and each year additional new regimens are being developed. Recent data show that MRD negative status (as estimated by next generation molecular methods or flow cytometry) has favorable prognostic value.3 However, additional trials are needed to determine if changes in treatment need to be made based on MRD status. At present, MRD results are recommended mainly as a prognostic metric and not for used in making treatment decisions.
Initial Treatment in Patients Eligible for Transplantation
Typically, patients are treated with approximately 3–4 cycles of induction therapy with bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) prior to stem cell harvest.4 If lenalidomide is not available for use as initial therapy or in the presence of acute renal failure, other bortezomib-containing regimens such as bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTd) or bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCd) can be used instead of VRd. After harvest, patients can either undergo frontline autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or resume induction therapy delaying ASCT until first relapse. In general, the low-dose dexamethasone regimen (40 mg once a week) is preferred in all regimens to minimize toxicity. In a randomized trial, low-dose dexamethasone approach was associated with superior survival and significantly lower toxicity.5 Similarly, the neurotoxicity of bortezomib can be greatly diminished by administering bortezomib once a week instead of twice-weekly, and by administering the drug subcutaneously instead of the intravenous route.
New options for initial therapy in younger patients include carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd, daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd), and daratumumab plus VRd. But additional data on impact of these regimens compared to VRd are needed. A randomized trial in the United States (referred to as the Endurance trial) is currently ongoing comparing VRd versus KRd as initial therapy.
Initial Treatment in Patients Not Eligible for Transplantation
In patients with newly diagnosed MM who are not candidates for ASCT due to age or other comorbidities, initial therapy is with VRd is administered for approximately 8–12 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide. Alternatives to VRd include VCd and VTd as discussed earlier.
Stem Cell Transplantation
A recent trial by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome compared early versus delayed ASCT in patients treated with VRd followed by lenalidomide maintenance.6 Patients were randomized to receive either VRd (3 cycles) followed by ASCT and then VRd consolidation (2 cycles) versus VRd x 8 cycles with ASCT reserved for relapse. Both arms received lenalidomide maintenance for one year. A significant improvement in PFS was seen as expected with early ASCT, but this has so far not translated into a difference in overall survival. Allogenic transplantation is still investigational, but can be considered for young patients with high-risk disease in first relapse.
Maintenance Therapy
Maintenance with lenalidomide is the standard of care for most patients after initial therapy. In a meta-analysis of randomized trials, a significant improvement in PFS and OS was seen with lenalidomide maintenance compared with placebo or no therapy.7 For high-risk patients, bortezomib-based maintenance should be considered.
Relapsed MM
Almost all patients with MM eventually relapse. The choice of a treatment regimen at relapse is complicated and is affected by many factors including the timing of the relapse, response to prior therapy, aggressiveness of the relapse, and performance status (TRAP). Patients are eligible transplant should be considered for the procedure if they have never had one before, or if they have had an excellent remission duration with the first transplant. As in newly diagnosed MM, VRd, VCd, and VTd are active regimens in relapsed disease.
Three daratumumab-based combinations have shown efficacy: daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd), daratumumab, bortezomib, dexamethasone (DVd), and daratumumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone (DPd).8 Other options include KRd, ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd), elotuzumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (ERd), and various pomalidomide-based regimens such as daratumumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone (DPd) and carfilzomib, pomalidomide, dexamethasone (KPd). For aggressive relapses, anthracycline-containing regimens may be useful.
Other drugs to consider for relapse include panobinostat, a pan-deacetylase inhibitor; and bendamustine-containing regimens such as bendamustine, lenalidomide, dexamethasone or bendamustine, bortezomib, dexamethasone. Venetoclax appears to have single-agent activity in patients with t(11;14) subtype of MM.
Two of the most exciting investigational options are chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) such as bb2121,9 and GSK2857916 (a humanized anti-BCMA antibody that is conjugated to monomethyl auristatin-F, a microtubule disrupting agent).10 Other agents with single-agent activity that are promising include isatuximab, selinexor, and and LGH-447 (a pan PIM kinase inhibitor).
Acknowledgements
Supported in part by grants CA 107476, CA 168762, and CA186781 from the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest to be disclosed.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
SVR declares no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group Updated Criteria for the Diagnosis of MM. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e538–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, et al. Continued improvement in survival in MM: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia 2014;28:1122–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in MM. The Lancet Oncology 2016;17:e328–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Durie BGM, Hoering A, Abidi MH, et al. Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Induction Followed by Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Maintenance in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma without Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: Results of the Randomised Phase III SWOG Trial S0777. Lancet 2017;389:519–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rajkumar SV, Jacobus S, Callander NS, et al. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed MM: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:29–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, et al. Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1311–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Attal M, Palumbo A, Holstein SA, et al. Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance (MNTC) after high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in MM (MM): A meta-analysis (MA) of overall survival (OS). J Clin Oncol 2016;34 (suppl):A8001 (abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA. Progress in Myeloma - A Monoclonal Breakthrough. The New England journal of medicine 2016;375:1390–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berdeja JG, Lin Y, Raje N, et al. Durable Clinical Responses in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Relapsed/Refractory MM: Updated Results from a Multicenter Study of bb2121 Anti-Bcma CAR T Cell Therapy. Blood 2017;130:740-. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Trudel S, Lendvai N, Popat R, et al. Deep and Durable Responses in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed/Refractory MM (MM) Treated with Monotherapy GSK2857916, an Antibody Drug Conjugate Against B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA): Preliminary Results from Part 2 of Study BMA117159. Blood 2017;130:741-. [Google Scholar]