Abstract
O4+ oligodendrocyte (OL) progenitors in the mammalian CNS are committed fully to terminal differentiation into myelin-forming cells. In the absence of other cell types in vitro, OL differentiation reproduces the in vivo development with a correct timing, suggesting the existence of an intrinsic regulatory mechanism that presently is unknown. We have examined the effect of two isoforms of the extracellular matrix (ECM) molecule tenascin-R (TN-R), which is expressed by OLs during the process of myelination, on the adhesion and maturation of OLs in vitro. Here we show that the substrate-bound molecules supported the adhesion of O4+ OLs independently of the CNS region or age from which they were derived. At the molecular level this process was mediated by protein binding to membrane surface sulfatides (Sulf), as indicated by the interference of O4 antibody and Sulf with the attachment of OLs or other Sulf+ cells, erythrocytes, to TN-R substrates and by direct protein–glycolipid binding studies. In the absence of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), exogenous TN-R induced myelin gene expression and the upregulation of its own synthesis by cultured cells, resulting in a rapid terminal differentiation of O4+ progenitors. Our findings strongly suggest that TN-R represents an intrinsic regulatory molecule that controls the timed OL differentiation by an autocrine mechanism and imply the relevance of TN-R for CNS myelination and remyelination.
Keywords: cell adhesion, extracellular matrix, glycosphin-golipid, myelination, oligodendrocyte differentiation, sulfatide, tenascin-R
In the mammalian CNS the differentiation of oligodendrocytes (OLs) is characterized by the sequential expression of myelin-specific molecules, which finally leads to the formation of the myelin sheath. The earliest stages of macroglial development take place in the ventral regions of the neural tube (for spinal cord) and the ventricular zones of the neonatal mammalian forebrain, where the first OL progenitors characterized by simple morphology and the expression of the disialoganglioside GD3 and/or the O4 antigen(s) proliferate and migrate into the presumptive white matter (Goldman and Vaysse, 1991;Noble, 1991; Skoff and Knapp, 1991; Miller, 1996). There, cells become postmitotic and differentiate into mature OLs of complex morphology, a process that correlates with the expression of myelin-specific lipids (membrane surface sulfatides, Sulf, and galactocerebrosides, GalC) and proteins (myelin basic protein, MBP; myelin-associated glycoprotein, MAG; and proteolipid protein, PLP). In the absence of other cell typesin vitro, O4+GalC− progenitor cells are committed fully to terminal differentiation, in contrast to myelinating Schwann cells in the PNS, which need axonal contact for the expression of myelin proteins and glycolipids (GLs; Gard and Pfeiffer, 1989; Jessen and Mirsky, 1991). These observations strongly suggest that the mechanism promoting the timed differentiation of OL progenitors is intrinsic for these cells. In different regions and tracts of the brain and the spinal cord, OL differentiation and myelin formation occur, however, asynchronously, suggesting that the regulation of myelination can be dominated by local environmental signals (Rozeik and Von Keyserlingk, 1987; Schwab and Schnell, 1989).
As previously shown, the extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein tenascin-R (TN-R)/janusin, a member of the TN multigene family that exists in two major molecular isoforms of 160 (TN-R 160) and 180 kDa (TN-R 180), is expressed in the CNS by cells of the O-2A cell lineage, OLs and type-2 astrocytes (Pesheva et al., 1989; Bartsch et al., 1993;Erickson, 1993). The protein is expressed additionally by small subsets of CNS neurons (mainly interneurons and motoneurons) during postnatal development and in adulthood (Fuss et al., 1993; Wintergerst et al., 1993). The primary structure of human TN-R shows very high homology (93%) to rat TN-R, and, similar to rodents, TN-R mRNA was found expressed exclusively in the human CNS (Carnemolla et al., 1996). So far two isoforms generated by alternative splicing of the sixth FN III homologous repeat have been identified, although the actual difference between TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 at a protein level is yet a matter of consideration (Pesheva et al., 1989; Fuss et al., 1993; Carnemolla et al., 1996). The expression of TN-R by OLs and in myelin coincides with the process of myelination, whereafter both mRNA and protein levels are downregulated to lower values in adulthood (Pesheva et al., 1989; Fuss et al., 1993). Mammalian TN-R is adhesive for astrocytes and antiadhesive for various CNS neurons, i.e., it causes the detachment of neuronal cells from and inhibits axonal outgrowth into TN-R-containing substrates in vitro by its interaction with the neuronal protein F3/11 (Pesheva et al., 1989, 1991, 1993; Morganti et al., 1990;Taylor et al., 1993).
The close correlation between myelinogenesis and TN-R expression in the developing rodent brain prompted us to investigate the possible role of the glycoproteins in the regulation of OL differentiation. We report that TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 promote the adhesion of O4+ OLs by a Sulf-mediated mechanism and induce the upregulation of TN-R and myelin protein expression, suggesting an autocrine TN-R-mediated mechanism of OL differentiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials. HBSS (Ca2+/Mg2+-free), Basal Medium Eagle (BME), DMEM (for SATO medium), and horse serum (HS) were purchased from Life Technologies (Eggenstein, Germany). TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 were immunoaffinity-purified from adult mouse brain (Pesheva et al., 1989). The fraction of brain polar GLs was prepared from adult mice as described elsewhere (Hakomori and Siddiqui, 1974) and contained O4+ and O1+ GLs (mainly Sulf and GalC), as determined by solid phase ligand-binding assay and thin layer chromatography. Bovine serum albumin (BSA, fatty acid-free); laminin (LN, from EHS sarcoma); monosialoganglioside GM1, GalC, Sulf, psychosine (all from bovine brain); sphingosine (from bovine brain cerebrosides); and galactosyl diglyceride (from wheat flour) were purchased from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany). The GRGDS peptide was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). Throughout this study the following mouse monoclonal antibodies to TN-R and OL surface molecules were used: 597, recognizing TN-R 180 in mouse brain, and 596, recognizing both TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 (Pesheva et al., 1989); A2B5, recognizing gangliosides on immature glial cells and neurons (Fredman et al., 1984); O4, recognizing Sulf/seminolipids expressed by OLs and in myelin; and O1, specific for cell surface galactolipids (mainly GalC) expressed by mature OLs (Bansal et al., 1989). Monoclonal rat antibodies to MBP (Brunner et al., 1989) and the HNK-1 carbohydrate structure (Künemund et al., 1988) and polyclonal rabbit antibodies to TN-R (Jung et al., 1993), NCAM (pNCAM) and MAG (pMAG), immunoaffinity-purified on immobilized antigens (Probstmeier et al., 1990), also were used. Fluorescein-labeled secondary antibodies were purchased from Dianova (Hamburg, Germany). Secondary antibodies coupled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) were purchased from Dako (Hamburg, Germany).
OL cell cultures. OLs were obtained from cerebral glial cultures of neonatal ICR mice (Morganti et al., 1990). After 7 d of culture in BME containing 5% HS, OLs were shaken off the astrocytic monolayer, collected by centrifugation (600 × g for 10 min at 4°C), and resuspended in modified SATO medium (Trotter et al., 1989). Cells then were plated onto poly-l-lysine (PLL)-coated surfaces (0.1 mg/ml in water), TN-R 160, TN-R 180, or LN (all at 20 μg/ml in PBS, pH 7.2) at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells/ml; the cells were maintained for various times in culture and analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence or Western blotting (Pesheva et al., 1989). For cell adhesion assays, OLs were shaken off the astrocytic monolayer after 8 d of culture. This procedure yielded a cell population containing a low number of GD3+O4−GFAP− OL precursor cells (∼15% of the total cell number) and enriched in O4+GalC− O-2A progenitor cells (∼35%) and O4+GalC+ OLs (∼50%). For simplicity, the latter two cell types will be referred to as O4+ OLs throughout the study.
Erythrocyte preparation. Erythrocytes were isolated from fresh rabbit blood (Nowak et al., 1976), treated with 1% trypsin in HBSS for 1 hr at 37°C, and subsequently washed in ice-cold PBS. Cells were treated further with 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 1 hr at 4°C, washed three times (600 × g for 10 min) with 0.2m glycine in PBS, and washed twice with PBS. Single-cell suspensions (5% in PBS containing 0.02% sodium azide) were stored at 4°C.
Short-term adhesion assays. The procedure used has been described elsewhere (Pesheva et al., 1993). In antibody perturbation experiments, OLs were plated onto the substrates in the presence of monoclonal antibodies to surface membrane GLs or the HNK-1 carbohydrate (O4, O1, anti-HNK-1, 100 μg/ml), polyclonal antibodies pNCAM or pMAG, or RGD-containing peptide (all at 50 μg/ml). In GL perturbation experiments, substrates were preincubated with different polar GLs in PBS containing 1% BSA for 1 hr at 37°C. Substrates subsequently were washed three times with cold PBS.
Solid phase ligand-binding assays. Different polar GLs dissolved in chloroform/methanol (2:1) were allowed to dry in glass tubes and redissolved in PBS by vigorous vortexing. Wells of microtiter plates (Falcon 3912; Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) were coated with 100 μl/well of each GL (at a concentration of 0.5 or 1 μg/ml) for 1 hr at 37°C. Alternatively, GLs were redissolved in absolute alcohol by vigorous vortexing, and wells were coated with 100 μl/well of each GL. Ethanol was allowed to evaporate at room temperature, and plates were incubated further overnight at 4°C. Then unsaturated binding sites on the plastic were blocked for 2 hr at room temperature with 2% BSA in PBS (200 μl/well). Wells subsequently were washed with cold PBS, and the binding of biotinylated (with N-hydroxysuccinimide biotin ester, Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 (2 μg/ml in PBS containing 1% BSA, 100 μl/well) was determined after 2 hr of incubation at 37°C by using HRP-conjugated streptavidin (Sigma; diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA, 100 μl/well) for detection. Similar results were obtained when unlabeled TN-R detected by polyclonal antibodies to TN-R and HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies were used for binding studies.
Sandwich ELISA. For quantification of TN-R protein, OL-conditioned SATO medium was analyzed by sandwich ELISA, using monoclonal antibodies to TN-R as a linker (596 and 597, at 20 μg/ml) and polyclonal antibodies to TN-R for detection. After incubation of OL-conditioned media (2 hr at 37°C, 100 μl/well), polyclonal antibody binding (2 hr at 37°C) was detected by anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany). Values for the TN-R content under different culture conditions were plotted onto a standard curve prepared in parallel from purified TN-R (in the range from 5 μg/ml to 3 pg/ml) and represented as mean ± SD, performed in triplicate.
Western blot analyses. Cultured OLs were detached from the substrates by pipetting and collected by centrifugation (600 ×g for 10 min at 4°C). Cells were extracted then with 20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 10 mm EDTA and 0.5% Triton X-100 for 1 hr at 4°C, and insoluble material was cleared by centrifugation (100 000 ×g for 20 min at 4°C). The resulting protein extracts (from 1 × 106 cells/lane) were subjected to SDS-PAGE, using 6–20% gradient polyacrylamide slab gels and analyzed further by Western blotting by using pNCAM, pMAG, or monoclonal antibody to MBP and the ECL method for detection (Amersham, Braunschweig, Germany). TN-R released into the culture medium from OLs maintained on PLL or PLL plus TN-R was immunoprecipitated by using polyclonal antibodies to TN-R and Pansorbin cells (Calbiochem, Bad Soden, Germany) as a carrier. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with monoclonal antibody 596. For ECL detection, the Tropix Western-Light Plus kit (Tropix, Wallisellen, Switzerland) was used.
Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR).Poly(A+) RNA was isolated from 2 × 106 OLs maintained on PLL or PLL plus TN-R by Oligotex purification (Qiagen, Basel, Switzerland). Poly(A+) RNA (110 ng) was used for oligo dT-primed single-strand cDNA synthesis with superscript reverse transcriptase (BRL, Basel, Switzerland) in 50 μl of reaction volume. RNA was hydrolyzed with RNase H. Single-strand cDNA (4 μl) was amplified in 20 μl of reaction volume, using the rat TN-R-specific primers 5′-GACATACAAGTCCACCGAT-3′ (upstream primer) and 5′-CTGTGAGACGATGGATGTA-3′ (downstream primer) in 10 mmTris-HCl, pH 9.0, 50 mm KCl, 1.5 mmMgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.2 μm dNTP, and 0.25 μm primer each. This amplification led to a 827 bp product. As control, GAPDH-specific primers were used with 1 μl of template cDNA. Products were amplified through 35 cycles of 45 sec at 94°C, 45 sec at 50°C, 90 sec at 72°C. Eight microliters were analyzed on 1.3% agarose gels. For the GAPDH- and TN-R-specific PCR products, band intensities were analyzed by using National Institutes of Health Image software and expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate assays.
RESULTS
Adhesion of oligodendrocytes to tenascin-R substrates
Cultured OLs synthesize and secrete the two major TN-R isoforms also found in brain tissue (Jung et al., 1993). To examine whether the proteins can serve as substrates for cell adhesion, we plated OLs derived from cerebral glial cultures (Morganti et al., 1990) onto substrate-bound TN-R 160, TN-R 180, PLL, or LN and maintained them for 24 hr in culture (Fig. 1). In contrast to CNS neurons, TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 supported the stable adhesion and process formation of OLs. On LN or PLL substrates, cells developed a highly branched process network, whereas TN-R promoted clustering of cell bodies and the projection of long and less branched processes. These cells did not proliferate, as judged by the lack of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. Notably, OLs derived from optic nerve, telencephalon, and cerebellum of different ages (postnatal day 1–14) displayed similar adhesion patterns on TN-R substrates, suggesting that the adhesive substrate properties of the molecule toward OLs are not restricted to cells of a certain CNS region or age.
Interaction of tenascin-R with oligodendrocytes is mediated by sulfatides
In the search for the molecular mechanisms underlying the interaction of TN-R with OLs, we took into account the observation that all OLs adhering to TN-R substrates were O4+. Furthermore, in mixed neural cell cultures or cultures enriched in OLs, TN-R mostly seems to be associated with O4+ progenitor cells and OLs, an expression pattern that closely correlates with the developmental expression and localization of the molecules in vivo(Pesheva et al., 1989; Warrington and Pfeiffer, 1992; Jung et al., 1993). We next examined the interaction between TN-R and OLs by a short-term adhesion assay in the presence of antibodies to OL surface molecules or RGD-containing peptide, which has been shown to mediate the binding of OLs to glia-derived matrix and to inhibit myelinogenic expression by OLs (Cardwell and Rome, 1988a,b). Under these conditions cell adhesion to LN was not affected by antibodies to OL surface molecules (data not shown). After 1 hr of incubation, GD3+O4− OL progenitors (a minor cell population present in the cell suspensions) did not adhere to TN-R substrates (R. Probstmeier, M. Michels, T. Franz, P. Pesheva, unpublished data). O4+ OLs (O4+GalC− progenitors and O4+GalC+ OLs) adhered to TN-R in a O4-dependent manner, as suggested by the selective interference of O4 antibodies with cell adhesion to both TN-R 160 and TN-R 180, but not to LN (Fig.2A, for TN-R). After 1 hr of incubation in the presence of O1 antibody, the adhesion of O4+ OLs to TN-R 180 only was inhibited by ∼50%. We further examined the effect of different glycosphingolipids expressed by OLs on cell attachment to TN-R substrates (Fig. 2B, left panel). The interaction of O4+ OLs with substrate-bound TN-R was inhibited almost completely by Sulf as well as by the fraction of brain polar GLs containing Sulf, whereas GalC, monosialoganglioside GM1, and sphingosine did not affect binding. If Sulf are cellular receptors for TN-R, then Sulf+ cells other than OLs, such as erythrocytes (Hansson et al., 1978), also should adhere to TN-R substrates by a O4/Sulf-dependent mechanism. The erythrocytes used in our studies were O4+ (our unpublished data), and after 1 hr of incubation these cells bound strongly to both TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 (Fig. 2B, right panel, for TN-R 160). Cell attachment to the substrates was abolished almost completely in the presence of the fraction of brain polar GLs and, to a similar extent, by O4 antibodies and Sulf (Fig.2B, for Sulf).
Finally, we studied the interaction of the two TN-R isoforms with polar GLs by a solid phase ligand-binding assay. The fraction of brain polar GLs or individual polar GLs was immobilized in the wells of microtiter plates, and the binding of TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 was determined after 2 hr of incubation at 37°C by using polyclonal antibodies to TN-R or biotinylated TN-R (Fig. 3). TN-R isoforms bound most strongly to Sulf, i.e., sulfogalactose-containing glycosphingolipids, or the Sulf+ fraction of brain polar GLs, and bound much weaker to galactose-containing glycosphingolipids such as GalC, galactosyl diglyceride, and psychosine (a 1-β-d-galactosylsphingosine), but not to sphingosine (Fig. 3A). Notably, TN-R 160 and especially TN-R 180 bound more readily to psychosine than to the other galactosphingolipids, whereas minimal binding was detectable on the monosialoganglioside GM1. TN-R 160 and TN-R 180 bound specifically to immobilized Sulf in a dose-dependent and saturable manner (Fig. 3B).
Effect of tenascin-R on the differentiation of O4+oligodendrocytes in vitro
To study the effect of the two TN-R isoforms on the differentiation of cultured O4+ OLs, cells were maintained on PLL, TN-R coated on top of PLL (PLL + TN-R), or TN-R alone, and the expression of differentiation marker molecules was examined by indirect immunofluorescence (Fig. 4, Table 1). OLs maintained on PLL developed a highly branched process network, and the majority of them was O4+ (∼80%) and O1+(∼50%). On TN-R-containing substrates, OLs extended less-branched processes and were labeled by the O4 (100%) and O1 antibodies (96%). Approximately 10% of all cells were labeled by the antibody A2B5, thus defining these cells as A2B5+O4+ O-2A progenitors. TN-R had a drastic effect on the differentiation of O4+ cells, because >90% of the cells expressed GalC and, to a different extent, MBP and PLP in their cell bodies and processes. On PLL substrates ∼25% of the cells expressed low amounts of MBP and PLP, predominantly defined to the cytoplasm. The levels of expression of NCAM remained constant under all culture conditions (Table 1, Fig.5).
Table 1.
Substrate | NCAM+ | A2B5+ | O4+ | O1+ | MBP+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLL | 100 | 20 ± 8 | 84 ± 3 | 50 ± 7 | 25 ± 3a |
PLL + TN-R | 100 | 10 ± 5 | 100 | 96 ± 51-b | 90 ± 4 |
TN-R | 100 | 8 ± 4 | 100 | 91 ± 61-b | 86 ± 8 |
OLs and OL progenitors derived from cerebral glial cultures were plated onto PLL, PLL + TN-R, and TN-R and maintained for 2 d in vitro in modified SATO medium. After this culture period cells were stained by indirect immunofluroescence with the antibodies A2B5, O4, O1 or monoclonal antibodies to NCAM and MBP. The percentages of immunoreactive cells ± SD are shown. For each marker the number of positive cells was counted in equivalent microscopic fields of comparable cell densities and related to the total cell number of these fields (∼1500 for each marker).
Weak immunoreactivity defined predominantly to the cytoplasm.
Immunoreactivities of various intensities distributed in cell bodies and processes.
To verify the upregulation of myelin protein expression by TN-R, we performed Western blot analyses of protein extracts prepared from OLs cultured for 2 d on PLL or PLL plus TN-R substrates (Fig. 5). The expression of NCAM, which in mature OLs is represented mainly by the 120 kDa isoform and minor amounts of the 140 kDa transmembrane isoform (Trotter et al., 1989), was not affected by TN-R. O4+ OLs maintained on TN-R-containing substrates expressed high levels of MBP and MAG, whereas those on PLL contained hardly detectable amounts of these molecules. Cultured OLs expressed predominantly the lowMr isoforms of MBP characteristic for later developmental stages in vivo (Dubois-Dalcq et al., 1986;Monge et al., 1986; Campagnoni, 1988; Brophy et al., 1993). The upregulation of myelin protein expression by TN-R could be inhibited specifically by Fab′ fragments of polyclonal antibodies to TN-R, but not by preimmune rabbit IgG (Fig. 5, for MBP).
Autocrine regulation of tenascin-R expression by cultured O4+ oligodendrocytes
We further examined the effect of TN-R on the production of endogenous protein by cultured O4+ OLs (Figs.6, 7). For the analysis of TN-R mRNA expression, we performed RT-PCR, using RNA from cells maintained on PLL or PLL plus TN-R 160 substrates. As control, the levels of mRNA expression of the housekeeping enzyme GAPDH in these cells were analyzed in parallel. In O4+ OLs maintained on TN-R-containing substrates, a 2.5- to threefold increase in TN-R-specific mRNA expression was observed, while the levels of GAPDH mRNA remained constant (Figs. 6A,7). The upregulation of TN-R mRNA expression was accompanied by an increased protein secretion (mainly TN-R 180), as demonstrated by Western blot analysis of medium conditioned by O4+ OLs maintained on PLL or PLL plus TN-R 160 (Fig. 6B). Under these conditions a two- to threefold increase in protein levels was detectable in the culture medium, as determined by sandwich ELISA of OL-conditioned media (Fig. 7).
DISCUSSION
Our findings demonstrate that two isoforms of an OL intrinsic molecule, TN-R 160 and TN-R 180, support the adhesion and process formation of OLs in vitro, a process mediated by the interaction with sulfated galactolipids, and results in a stimulation of OL maturation, i.e., upregulation of expression of myelin proteins (TN-R, MBP, MAG, and PLP) and GLs (GalC), suggesting an autocrine, TN-R-mediated mechanism of differentiation. Consistent with the regulatory role of TN-R is the finding that TN-R mRNA and protein (Pesheva et al., 1989; Fuss et al., 1993) emerge in OLs before the expression of MAG, MBP, and PLP (Dubois-Dalcq et al., 1986; Monge et al., 1986; Ikenaka et al., 1991; Brophy et al., 1993). Beside Sulf and the structurally related seminolipids, O4 antibodies have been suggested to react with an as yet unknown molecule expressed by O4+ early progenitors, proligodendroblasts, in which Sulf synthesis was not detectable (Bansal et al., 1989, 1992), and we cannot rule out the possibility that at very early stages of OL development TN-R may interact also with this molecule. Later on, sulfated galactolipids represent the major TN-R receptor at the OL cell surface, because OLs of different postnatal age, i.e., differentiation state, continuously express Sulf in vivo and in vitro(Bansal and Pfeiffer, 1992). In addition, our findings on the (1) interaction of TN-R with galactose-containing GLs, i.e., GalC, galactosyl diglyceride, and psychosine, all of which are also recognized by the O1 antibody (Bansal et al., 1989), and (2) interference of the latter with OL-TN-R 180 interactions suggest that, with progressing maturation, TN-R may interact also with galactolipids at the OL cell surface. The effect of TN-R on OLs strikingly resembles the stimulation of OL differentiation in culture by O4 antibodies (Bansal et al., 1988). For the effect of O4 antibodies, it has been proposed that (1) cell aggregation could allow the concentration of an OL autocrine factor necessary for maturation, and (2) Sulf are involved functionally in the regulation of OL differentiation and myelination. Lipid and/or protein sulfation seems to be important for oligodendrocyte maturation (Bansal and Pfeiffer, 1994), and on the basis of our present finding that Sulf are cellular receptors for TN-R, we would like to postulate that TN-R stimulates the differentiation of OLs by a Sulf-mediated mechanism.
The signal transduction mechanism by which the interaction of membrane-associated sulfated and/or nonsulfated galactosphingolipids with TN-R regulates myelin gene expression is presently unknown. Agents raising the intracellular cAMP concentrations, in general, can induce myelin gene expression in both OLs and Schwann cells, suggesting the participation of this second messenger in the signaling cascade (Gandelman et al., 1989). Interaction with Sulf and GalC, in particular, induces calcium responses and rearrangement of the cytoskeleton in OLs (Dyer and Benjamins, 1990, 1991). These signals may be essential to OL maturation and subsequent myelination (Dyer, 1993) because anti-GalC antibodies inhibit myelination in vitro and in vivo (Fry et al., 1974; Ranscht et al., 1987; Bansal and Pfeiffer, 1989; Rosenbluth et al., 1994), and mice lacking the enzyme UDP-galactose/ceramide galactosyltransferase, which is required for the synthesis of GalC and Sulf, exhibit severe generalized tremoring and conduction deficits consistent with impaired function of the myelin sheath (Coetzee et al., 1996).
MBP, which comprises ∼30% of the myelin proteins in CNS myelin, first appears between the fifth and seventh day after birth when both mRNA and protein are detectable mostly in the cytoplasm (Campagnoni, 1988; Brophy et al., 1993). The migration of MBP mRNA and protein into the OL processes during development normally takes 6–12 d. On TN-R substrates this process is accomplished within 2–3 d in vitro when OLs heavily express the 14 kDa protein isoform characteristic of mature myelin membranes in vivo. Additional studies have shown that this MBP isoform is sufficient for myelination in transgenic shiverer mice (Kimura et al., 1989).
Our present knowledge on the control of proliferation and differentiation of OL progenitors comes predominantly from studies on glial cell lineages in the rodent optic nerve and forebrain (Raff et al., 1983; Vaysse and Goldman, 1990; Noble, 1991; Barres and Raff, 1994). A simplified overview is shown in Figure 8. In the presence of type-1 astrocytes or astrocyte-conditioned medium, the differentiation of O-2A progenitors into OLs reproduces the in vivo development with a correct timing (Noble and Murray, 1984;Raff et al., 1985). One of the factors responsible for the effects of type-1 astrocytes was found to be platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (Noble et al., 1988; Raff et al., 1988; Richardson et al., 1988). The molecular mechanism by which the O-2A cells stop to proliferate and differentiate terminally remained, however, obscure because OLs continue to express functional PDGF receptors (Hart et al., 1989a,b). We have shown that one of the effects of PDGF on O-2A progenitors is the upregulation of TN-R expression (Jung et al., 1993). Because TN-R stimulates OL maturation in the absence of PDGF, the timed differentiation of OLs in the presence of PDGF probably is attributable to the accumulation of TN-R in these cultures to a critical threshold, triggering the differentiation program. Neurons could be important in the regulation of progenitor cell proliferation in vivobecause they are one of the sources for mitogens, such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and PDGF (Gard and Pfeiffer, 1990; Yeh et al., 1991; Araujo and Cotman, 1992). O-2A cells proliferate in response to bFGF (McKinnon et al., 1990), and exposure to both bFGF and PDGF promotes the continuous proliferation of progenitor cells (Bögler et al., 1990). On removal of PDGF and bFGF from these cultures, O-2A progenitors stop dividing and differentiate very rapidly. Because bFGF (Jung et al., 1993) and exposure to both bFGF and PDGF (P. Pesheva and R. Probstmeier, unpublished observations) have no effect on the expression of TN-R by cultured OLs, the increased rapidity of OL differentiation could be attributable to the differentiation-inducing effect of TN-R in the absence of the mitogens. Precursor cell proliferation depends, however, on multiple signals from other cell types: ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) enhances the rate of OL generation (Mayer et al., 1994; Barres et al., 1996), whereas PDGF, neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) induce the proliferation and differentiation of OL precursors; the three growth factors also promote the survival of these cells in culture (Barres et al., 1992, 1993, 1994b). Whereas proliferation is driven by these growth factors, all of which bind to receptor tyrosine kinases, the effector mechanism inducing differentiation seems to depend on (1) thyroid hormones, glucocorticoids, and retinoic acid that activate intracellular receptors (Barres et al., 1994a; Barres and Raff, 1994) and/or (2) the accumulation of intrinsic molecules such as TN-R that trigger extracellular receptors (this study). The control of timed generation of OLs seems, however, to be more complex than previously suggested. A recent study providing a careful analysis of such timing mechanisms in vitro gives evidence, in fact, that thyroid hormone modulates the extent of OL generation within O-2A progenitor cell clones, but it does not alter the probability of individual clones to generate at least one OL, i.e., the mechanism inducing the initial generation of OLs seems to be cell-intrinsic, thyroid hormone-independent, whereas the regulation of progenitor self-renewal is cell-extrinsic because it can be modulated by a variety of signaling molecules such as thyroid hormone (Ibarrola et al., 1996).
After trauma or in demyelinating diseases, the generation of new OLs with potential for myelination is likely to occur by the proliferation of O-2Aadult progenitors or mature OLs (Ludwin, 1984; Raine et al., 1988; Wood and Bunge, 1991). In the spinal cord of adult mice, demyelinating lesions lead to the induction of FGF expression (Tourbah et al., 1992) and the proliferation of O4+ and O4+GFAP+ cells (Godfraind et al., 1989), suggesting that an FGF-induced proliferation of O-2A progenitors in this part of the CNS may give rise to new OLs (O4+) with remyelination capacity and type-2 astrocytes (O4+GFAP+). The generation of these two glial cell types is very similar to the O-2A cell lineage in the optic nerve, where both OLs and type-2 astrocytes express TN-R (Bartsch et al., 1993). Transplanted type-1 astrocytes support remyelination by host OLsin vivo (Franklin et al., 1991) and are probably the main source for oligodendrotrophic factors or factors that protect OLs against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-induced and natural death, such as FGF, PDGF, NT-3, IGF-1, CNTF, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and IL-6 (Araujo and Cotman, 1992; Eddleston and Mucke, 1993; Louis et al., 1993; Mayer et al., 1994; Hopkins and Rothwell, 1995; Sawada et al., 1995). In the context of our present findings, current studies of ours demonstrate that growth factors and cytokines found to be produced by reactive astrocytes and activated microglia in association with different CNS pathologies (Scolding et al., 1994; Rothwell and Hopkins, 1995; Kreutzberg, 1996) can influence the expression of TN-R by OLs and thus affect the remyelinating capacity of these cells during demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis or other neurodegenerative processes in the human CNS.
Footnotes
Parts of this study were supported by the BONFOR Research Program (P.P.), the Swiss National Science Foundation (S.G.), and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (R.P.). We thank I. Bahnmüller for expert technical help and K. Winterhalter (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich) for support during a critical stage of this work (P.P.).
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Penka Pesheva, Department of Physiology, Neurophysiology, University of Bonn, Wilhelmstrasse 31, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
REFERENCES
- 1.Araujo DM, Cotman CW. Basic FGF in astroglial, microglial, and neuronal cultures: characterization of binding sites and modulation of release by lymphokines and trophic factors. J Neurosci. 1992;12:1668–1678. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-05-01668.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bansal R, Pfeiffer SE. Reversible inhibition of oligodendrocyte progenitor differentiation by a monoclonal antibody against surface galactolipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:6181–6185. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bansal R, Pfeiffer SE. A novel stage in the oligodendrocyte lineage defined by the reactivity of progenitors with R-mAb prior to O1 anti-galactocerebroside. J Neurosci Res. 1992;32:309–316. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490320303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bansal R, Pfeiffer SE. Inhibition of protein and lipid sulfation in oligodendrocytes blocks biological responses to FGF-2 and retards cytoarchitectural maturation, but not developmental lineage progression. Dev Biol. 1994;162:511–524. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bansal R, Gard AL, Pfeiffer SE. Stimulation of oligodendrocyte differentiation in culture by growth in the presence of a monoclonal antibody to sulfated glycolipid. J Neurosci Res. 1988;21:260–267. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490210218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bansal R, Warrington AE, Gard AL, Ranscht B, Pfeiffer SE. Multiple and novel specificities of monoclonal antibodies O1, O4, R-mAb used in the analysis of oligodendrocyte development. J Neurosci Res. 1989;24:548–557. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490240413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bansal R, Stefansson K, Pfeiffer SE. Proligodendroblast antigen (POA), a developmental antigen expressed by A007/O4-positive oligodendrocyte progenitors prior to the appearance of sulfatide and galactocerebroside. J Neurochem. 1992;58:2221–2229. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10967.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barres BA, Raff MC. Control of oligodendrocyte number in the developing rat optic nerve. Neuron. 1994;12:935–942. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90305-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barres BA, Hart IK, Coles HSR, Burne JE, Voyvodic JT, Richardson WD, Raff MC. Cell death and control of cell survival in the oligodendrocyte lineage. Cell. 1992;70:31–46. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90531-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barres BA, Schmid R, Sendtner M, Raff MC. Multiple extracellular signals are required for long-term oligodendrocyte survival. Development (Camb) 1993;118:283–295. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.1.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barres BA, Lazar M, Raff MC. A novel role for thyroid hormone, glucocorticoids, and retinoic acid in timing oligodendrocyte differentiation. Development (Camb) 1994a;120:1097–1108. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.5.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barres BA, Raff MC, Gaese F, Bartke I, Dechant G, Barde YA. A crucial role for neurotrophin-3 in oligodendrocyte development. Nature. 1994b;367:371–375. doi: 10.1038/367371a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barres BA, Burne JF, Holtmann B, Thoenen H, Sendtner M, Raff MC. Ciliary neurotrophic factor enhances the rate of oligodendrocyte generation. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1996;8:146–156. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1996.0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bartsch U, Pesheva P, Raff M, Schachner M. Expression of janusin (J1-160/180) in the retina and optic nerve of the developing and adult mouse. Glia. 1993;9:57–69. doi: 10.1002/glia.440090108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bögler O, Wren D, Barnett SC, Land H, Noble M. Cooperation between two growth factors promotes extended self-renewal and inhibits differentiation of O-2A progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:6368–6372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.16.6368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brophy PJ, Boccaccio GL, Colman DR. The distribution of myelin basic protein mRNAs within myelinating oligodendrocytes. Trends Neurosci. 1993;16:515–521. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90196-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brunner C, Lassmann H, Waehneldt TV, Matthieu J-M, Linington C. Differential ultrastructural localization of myelin basic protein, myelin/oligodendroglial glycoprotein, and 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase in the CNS of adult rats. J Neurochem. 1989;52:296–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1989.tb10930.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campagnoni AT. Molecular biology of myelin proteins from the central nervous system. J Neurochem. 1988;51:1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb04827.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cardwell MC, Rome LH. Evidence that an RGD-dependent receptor mediates the binding of oligodendrocytes to a novel ligand in a glial-derived matrix. J Cell Biol. 1988a;107:1541–1549. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cardwell MC, Rome LH. RGD-containing peptides inhibit the synthesis of myelin-like membrane by cultured oligodendrocytes. J Cell Biol. 1988b;107:1551–1559. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Carnemolla B, Leprini A, Borsi L, Querzé G, Urbini S, Zardi L. Human tenascin-R. Complete primary structure, pre-mRNA alternative splicing, and gene localization on chromosome 1q23–q24. J Biol Chem. 1996;14:8157–8160. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.14.8157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coetzee T, Fujita N, Dupree J, Shi R, Blight A, Suzuki K, Suzuki K, Popko B. Myelination in the absence of galactocerebroside and sulfatide: normal structure with abnormal function and regional instability. Cell. 1996;86:209–219. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80093-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dubois-Dalcq M, Behar T, Hudson L, Lazzarini RA. Emergence of three myelin proteins in oligodendrocytes cultured without neurons. J Cell Biol. 1986;102:384–392. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.2.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dyer CA. Novel oligodendrocyte transmembrane signaling systems. Mol Neurobiol. 1993;7:1–22. doi: 10.1007/BF02780606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dyer CA, Benjamins JA. Glycolipids and transmembrane signaling: antibodies to galactocerebroside cause a calcium influx in oligodendrocytes. J Cell Biol. 1990;111:625–633. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.2.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dyer CA, Benjamins JA. Galactocerebroside and sulfatide independently mediate Ca2+ responses in oligodendrocytes. J Neurosci Res. 1991;30:699–711. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490300414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eddleston M, Mucke L. Molecular profile of reactive astrocytes—implications for their role in neurologic disease. Neuroscience. 1993;54:15–36. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90380-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Erickson HP. Tenascin-C, tenascin-R, and tenascin-X: a family of talented proteins in search of functions. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993;5:869–876. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90037-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Franklin RJ, Crang AJ, Blakemore WF. Transplanted type-1 astrocytes facilitate repair of demyelinating lesions by host oligodendrocytes in adult rat spinal cord. J Neurocytol. 1991;20:420–430. doi: 10.1007/BF01355538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fredman P, Magnani JL, Nirenberg M, Ginsburg V. Monoclonal antibody A2B5 reacts with many gangliosides in neuronal tissue. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1984;233:661–666. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(84)90492-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fry JM, Weissbarth S, Lehrer GM. Cerebroside antibody inhibits sulfatide synthesis and myelination and demyelinates in cord tissue cultures. Science. 1974;183:540–542. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4124.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fuss B, Wintergerst ES, Bartsch U, Schachner M. Molecular characterization and in situ messenger RNA localization of the neural recognition molecule J1-160/180—a modular structure similar to tenascin. J Cell Biol. 1993;120:1237–1249. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.5.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gandelman K-Y, Pfeiffer SE, Carson JH. Cyclic AMP regulation of P0 glycoprotein and myelin basic protein gene expression in semi-differentiated peripheral neurinoma cell line D6P2T. Development (Camb) 1989;106:389–398. doi: 10.1242/dev.106.2.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gard AL, Pfeiffer SE. Oligodendrocyte progenitors isolated directly from developing telencephalon at a specific phenotypic stage: myelinogenic potential in a defined environment. Development (Camb) 1989;106:119–132. doi: 10.1242/dev.106.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gard AL, Pfeiffer SE. Two proliferative stages of the oligodendrocyte lineage (A2B5+O4− and O4+GalC−) under different mitogenic control. Neuron. 1990;5:615–625. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90216-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Godfraind C, Friedrich VL, Holmes KV, Dubois-Dalcq M. In vivo analysis of glial cell phenotypes during a viral demyelinating disease in mice. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:2405–2416. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.5.2405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goldman JE, Vaysse PJ. Tracing glial cell lineages in the mammalian forebrain. Glia. 1991;4:149–156. doi: 10.1002/glia.440040206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hakomori S-H, Siddiqui B. Isolation and characterization of glycosphingolipids from animal cells and their membranes. Methods Enzymol. 1974;32:345–367. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(74)32036-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hansson CG, Karlsson K, Samuelsson BE. The identification of sulphatides in human erythrocyte membrane and their relation to sodium–potassium-dependent adenosine triphosphate. J Biochem. 1978;83:813–819. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hart IK, Richardson WD, Bolsover SR, Raff MC. PDGF and intracellular signaling in the timing of oligodendrocyte differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1989a;109:3411–3417. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.3411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hart IK, Richardson WD, Heldin CH, Westermark B, Raff MC. PDGF receptors on cells of the oligodendrocyte-type-2 astrocyte (O-2A) cell lineage. Development (Camb) 1989b;105:596–604. doi: 10.1242/dev.105.3.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hopkins SJ, Rothwell NJ. Cytokines and the nervous system I: expression and recognition. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:83–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ibarrola N, Mayer-Pröschel M, Rodriguez-Pena A, Noble M. Evidence for the existence of at least two timing mechanisms that contribute to oligodendrocyte generation in vitro. Dev Biol. 1996;180:1–21. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ikenaka K, Okano H, Tamura T, Mikoshiba K. Recent advances in studies on genes for myelin proteins. Dev Growth Differ. 1991;33:181–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.1991.00181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jessen KR, Mirsky R. Schwann cell precursors and their development. Glia. 1991;4:185–194. doi: 10.1002/glia.440040210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jung M, Pesheva P, Schachner M, Trotter J. Astrocytes and neurons regulate the expression of the neural recognition molecule janusin by cultured oligodendrocytes. Glia. 1993;9:163–175. doi: 10.1002/glia.440090302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kimura M, Sato M, Akatsuka A, Nozawa-Kimura S, Takahashi R, Yokoyama M, Nomura T, Katsuki M. Restoration of myelin formation by a single type of myelin basic protein in transgenic shiverer mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:5661–5665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kreutzberg GW. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:312–318. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Künemund V, Jungalwala FB, Fischer G, Chou DKH, Keilhauer G, Schachner M. The L2/HNK-1 carbohydrate of neural cell adhesion molecules is involved in cell interactions. J Cell Biol. 1988;106:213–223. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.1.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Louis J-C, Magal E, Takayama S, Varon S. CNTF protection of oligodendrocytes against natural and tumor necrosis factor-induced death. Science. 1993;259:689–692. doi: 10.1126/science.8430320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ludwin SK. Proliferation of mature oligodendrocytes after trauma to the central nervous system. Nature. 1984;308:274–275. doi: 10.1038/308274a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mayer M, Bhakoo K, Noble M. CNTF and LIF promote the generation, maturation, and survival of oligodendrocytes in vitro. Development (Camb) 1994;120:143–153. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.1.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.McKinnon RD, Matsui T, Dubois-Dalcq M, Aaronson SA. FGF modulates the PDGF-driven pathway of oligodendrocyte development. Neuron. 1990;5:603–614. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90215-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Miller RH. Oligodendrocyte origins. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:92–96. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)80036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Monge M, Kadiiski D, Jacque CM, Zalc B. Oligodendroglial expression and deposition of four myelin constituents in the myelin sheath during development: an in vivo study. Dev Neurosci. 1986;8:222–235. doi: 10.1159/000112255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Morganti MC, Taylor J, Pesheva P, Schachner M. Oligodendrocyte-derived J1-160/180 extracellular matrix glycoproteins are adhesive or repulsive, depending on the partner cell type and time of interaction. Exp Neurol. 1990;109:98–110. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4886(05)80012-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Noble M. Points of controversy in the O-2A lineage: clocks and type-2 astrocytes. Glia. 1991;4:157–164. doi: 10.1002/glia.440040207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Noble M, Murray K. Purified astrocytes promote the in vitro division of a bipotential glial progenitor cell. EMBO J. 1984;3:2243–2247. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02122.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Noble M, Murray K, Stroobant P, Waterfield M, Riddle P. Platelet-derived growth factor promotes division and motility and inhibits premature differentiation of the oligodendrocyte-type-2 astrocyte progenitor cell. Nature. 1988;333:560–562. doi: 10.1038/333560a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nowak TP, Haywood PL, Barondes SH. Developmentally regulated lectin in embryonic chick pectoral muscle and a myogenic cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976;68:650–657. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(76)91195-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pesheva P, Spiess E, Schachner M. J1-160 and J1-180 are oligodendrocyte-secreted nonpermissive substrates for cell adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:1765–1778. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.4.1765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pesheva P, Probstmeier R, Spiess E, Schachner M. Divalent cations modulate the inhibitory substrate properties of murine glial-derived J1-160 and J1-180 extracellular matrix glycoproteins for neuronal adhesion. Eur J Neurosci. 1991;3:356–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1991.tb00823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pesheva P, Gennarini G, Goridis C, Schachner M. The F3/11 cell adhesion molecule mediates the repulsion of neurons by the extracellular matrix glycoprotein J1-160/180. Neuron. 1993;10:69–82. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90243-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Probstmeier R, Martini R, Tacke R, Schachner M. Expression of the adhesion molecules L1, N-CAM, and J1/tenascin during development of the murine small intestine. Differentiation. 1990;44:42–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1990.tb00535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Raff MC, Miller RH, Noble M. A glial progenitor cell that develops into an astrocyte or an oligodendrocyte, depending on the culture medium. Nature. 1983;303:390–396. doi: 10.1038/303390a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Raff MC, Abney ER, Fok-Seang J. Reconstitution of a developmental clock in vitro: a critical role for astrocytes in the timing of oligodendrocyte differentiation. Cell. 1985;42:61–69. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80101-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Raff MC, Lillien LE, Richardson WD, Burne JF, Noble M. Platelet-derived growth factor from astrocytes drives the clock that times oligodendrocyte development in culture. Nature. 1988;333:562–565. doi: 10.1038/333562a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Raine CS, Moore GR, Hintzen R, Traugott N. Induction of oligodendrocyte proliferation and remyelination after chronic demyelination. Relevance to multiple sclerosis. Lab Invest. 1988;59:467–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ranscht B, Wood PA, Bunge RP. Inhibition of in vitro peripheral myelin formation by monoclonal anti-galactocerebroside. J Neurosci. 1987;7:2936–2947. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-09-02936.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Richardson WD, Pringle N, Mosley M, Westermark B, Dubois-Dalcq M. A role for the platelet-derived growth factor in normal gliogenesis in the central nervous system. Cell. 1988;53:309–319. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90392-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rosenbluth J, Liu Z, Guo D, Schiff R. Inhibition of CNS myelin development in vivo by implantation of anti-GalC hybridoma cells. J Neurocytol. 1994;23:699–707. doi: 10.1007/BF01181644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rothwell NJ, Hopkins SJ. Cytokines and the nervous system. II. Actions and mechanisms of action. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:130–136. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93890-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rozeik C, Von Keyserlingk D. The sequence of myelination in the brainstem of the rat monitored by myelin basic protein immunohistochemistry. Dev Brain Res. 1987;35:183–190. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(87)90043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sawada M, Suzumura A, Marunouchi T. Cytokine network in the central nervous system and its roles in growth and differentiation of glial and neuronal cells. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1995;13:253–264. doi: 10.1016/0736-5748(94)00076-F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schwab ME, Schnell L. Region-specific appearance of myelin constituents in the developing rat spinal cord. J Neurocytol. 1989;18:161–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01206659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Scolding NJ, Zajicek JP, Wood N, Compston DAS. The pathogenesis of demyelinating disease. Prog Neurobiol. 1994;43:143–173. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(94)90011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Skoff RP, Knapp PE. Division of astroblasts and oligodendroblasts in postnatal rodent brain: evidence for separate astrocyte and oligodendrocyte lineages. Glia. 1991;4:165–174. doi: 10.1002/glia.440040208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Taylor J, Pesheva P, Schachner M. Influence of janusin and tenascin on growth cone behavior in vitro. J Neurosci Res. 1993;35:347–362. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490350402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Tourbah A, Baron-Van Evercooren A, Oliver L, Raulais D, Jeanny JC, Gumpel M. Endogenous aFGF expression and cellular changes after a demyelinating lesion in the spinal cord of adult normal mice: immunohistochemical study. J Neurosci Res. 1992;33:47–59. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490330107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Trotter J, Bitter-Suermann D, Schachner M. Differentiation-regulated loss of the polysialylated embryonic form and expression of the different polypeptides of the neural cell adhesion molecule by oligodendrocytes and myelin. J Neurosci Res. 1989;22:369–383. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490220402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Vaysse PJ-J, Goldman JE. A clonal analysis of glial lineages in neonatal forebrain development in vitro. Neuron. 1990;5:227–235. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90160-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Warrington AE, Pfeiffer SE. Proliferation and differentiation of O4+ oligodendrocytes in postnatal rat cerebellum: analysis in unfixed tissue slices using anti-glycolipid antibodies. J Neurosci Res. 1992;33:338–353. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490330218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wintergerst ES, Fuss B, Bartsch U. Localization of janusin mRNA in the central nervous system of the developing and adult mouse. Eur J Neurosci. 1993;5:299–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1993.tb00497.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wood PM, Bunge RP. The origin of remyelinating cells in the adult central nervous system: the role of the mature oligodendrocyte. Glia. 1991;4:225–232. doi: 10.1002/glia.440040214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yeh H-J, Riut KG, Wang Y-X, Parks WC, Snider WD, Deuel TF. PDGF A-chain gene is expressed by mammalian neurons during development and in maturity. Cell. 1991;64:209–216. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90222-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]