Background: Platelet transfusions are widely used to treat thrombocytopenia of various etiology. There are two different methods of preparation of platelet concentrate from whole blood, one is Platelet-rich plasma method (PRP) and the Buffy Coat Removed (BCR) method. A large number of studies have compared in-vitro activation of platelets among BCR platelets and PRP platelets but their significant clinical effects in patients has not been evaluated in any of these studies.
Aim: Aim of our study is to compare clinical outcome of patients transfused with platelets prepared by PRP method and BCR method.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in Dept of IHBT, JMMC Thrissur, over a period of two years. A total of 100 patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled into the study with fifty patients in each group. Outcome of patients transfused with PRP derived platelets and Buffy coat removed platelets were compared on the basis of absolute and corrected count increment, percent platelet recovery and incidence of post transfusion reactions.
Results: The mean absolute count increment in BCR group was 23,900/μl with a standard deviation of 7022.56/μl. The mean absolute count increment in PRP group was 18,910/μl with a standard deviation of 7482.42/μl. The difference is statistically significant with a p value of 0.001. The mean CCI of PRP group is 12847 with a standard deviation of 5146.76 and in BCR group it is 12897 with a standard deviation of 4266.82 and this difference was not statistically significant p value (0.957). None of the patient transfused with BCR platelets reported a transfusion reaction while one out of 50 (2%) patients transfused with PRP platelets had FNHTR.
Conclusion: On the basis of count increment, corrected count increment, percent platelet recovery and incidence of post transfusion reactions, BCR platelet transfusions showed a better outcome than PRP platelet transfusions.
