Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2019 May 23;116(24):11966–11971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818434116

An activatable PET imaging radioprobe is a dynamic reporter of myeloperoxidase activity in vivo

Cuihua Wang a,1, Edmund Keliher a,1, Matthias W G Zeller a, Gregory R Wojtkiewicz a, Aaron D Aguirre a,b, Leonard Buckbinder c, Hye-Yeong Kim a, Jianqing Chen c, Kevin Maresca c, Maaz S Ahmed a, Negin Jalali Motlagh a, Matthias Nahrendorf a, John W Chen a,d,2
PMCID: PMC6575581  PMID: 31123149

Significance

The innate immune response mediates tissue damage in many diseases, but available clinical imaging technologies do not distinguish between damaging and beneficial immune responses. We developed and validated a positron emission tomography radioprobe to noninvasively report on the activity of the damaging enzyme myeloperoxidase secreted by proinflammatory innate immune cells. The high sensitivity and specificity of the radioprobe enable the detection of damaging inflammation at an earlier stage than currently possible. Such early detection could lead to early treatment before irreversible damage occurs. With its properties characterized and synthesis automated, this radioprobe is a promising imaging biomarker ready for translation to track many diseases, including cardiovascular, neurological, and rheumatological diseases.

Keywords: PET imaging, myeloperoxidase, inflammation

Abstract

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is a critical proinflammatory enzyme implicated in cardiovascular, neurological, and rheumatological diseases. Emerging therapies targeting inflammation have raised interest in tracking MPO activity in patients. We describe 18F-MAPP, an activatable MPO activity radioprobe for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The activated radioprobe binds to proteins and accumulates at sites of MPO activity. The radioprobe 18F-MAPP has a short blood half-life, remains stable in plasma, does not demonstrate cytotoxicity, and crosses the intact blood–brain barrier. The 18F-MAPP imaging detected sites of elevated MPO activity in living mice embedded with human MPO and in mice induced with chemical inflammation or myocardial infarction. The 18F-MAPP PET imaging noninvasively differentiated varying amounts of MPO activity, competitive inhibition, and MPO deficiency in living animals, confirming specificity and showing that the radioprobe can quantify changes in in vivo MPO activity. The radiosynthesis has been optimized and automated, an important step in translation. These data indicate that 18F-MAPP is a promising translational candidate to noninvasively monitor MPO activity and inflammation in patients.


Inflammation plays a key role in highly prevalent diseases, including many cardiovascular (1, 2), neurological (3), and rheumatological diseases (4). While an appropriate immune response can be beneficial and effect repair, aberrant activation of this response recruits excessive proinflammatory cells to cause damage. Genome-wide association studies of Alzheimer’s disease (5) and myocardial infarction (6) showed that genes encoding inflammation-related factors can change the risk of developing these diseases. Although blood level of C-reactive protein has been used successfully to develop canakinumab in the Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study trial, blood biomarkers are indirect assessments and cannot identify the locations of inflammation and could be limited by inflammation elsewhere from off-target diseases and conditions. As such, inflammatory blood biomarkers are best used in large phase 3 trials where noise from individual patients is averaged out. For early phase drug development as well as for personalized therapy, more precise reporters of damaging inflammation are needed. Thus, there has been growing interest to identify imaging biomarkers for damaging inflammation to study its role in human diseases, identify patients at risk, and guide the development of anti-inflammatory therapies (7, 8).

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is one such potential biomarker. Through transcriptomic profiling in a heart transplant model MPO has been identified to be highly expressed by proinflammatory cells but not by reparative cells (9). Abundant in proinflammatory innate immune cells, including neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and microglia, MPO catalyzes the formation of hypochlorous acid and other reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (10). MPO and its products not only kill pathogens in host defense but also oxidize lipids, proteins, DNA, and RNA to cause protein aggregation, cell signaling interruption, mutagenesis, and tissue damage (11). MPO and its excessive production of oxidants are implicated in a variety of acute and chronic diseases, including atherosclerosis (12), atrial fibrillation (13), myocardial infarction (14, 15), Alzheimer’s disease (16), multiple sclerosis (17, 18), Parkinson’s disease (19), and vasculitis (20). To combat MPO’s deleterious effects, MPO inhibitors are being developed and tested in animal and human studies, which include PF-2999 for cardiovascular diseases (21), AZD3241 for Parkinson’s disease (22), and PF-1355 for vasculitis and glomerulonephritis (23), among others.

Among the current imaging methods to detect MPO activity and its reactive species, bioluminescent luminol (24, 25), L-012 (26), fluorescent oxazine conjugated nanoparticles (27), sulfonaphthoaminophenyl fluorescein (28) and bis-5-HT-DTPA-Gd (MPO-Gd) (29) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been developed for in vivo imaging applications. However, most of the bioluminescence- and fluorescence-based agents target one or several reactive oxygen species or reactive nitrogen species and are not specific to MPO (30). These agents also have shallow depth of penetration, which limits their translational potential for human use. MPO-Gd is limited by the relatively lower detection sensitivity intrinsic to MRI. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) analogs of MPO-Gd formed by substituting Gd with 111In (31, 32) or 67Ga (33) have greater detection sensitivity but have a long radioactive half-life of ∼3 d and, like MPO-Gd, cannot cross the blood–brain barrier. These issues have hampered the translation and application of these agents to benefit patients. To overcome these limitations and enable rapid translation, we developed, characterized, and validated an 18F-based positron emission tomography (PET) imaging radioprobe, without the need for a metal center or chelating backbone, to be a translational candidate to noninvasively report MPO activity and damaging inflammation in vivo.

Results

Synthesis of Nonradioactive Compound 19F-MAPP.

The nonradioactive compound 19F-MAPP (myeloperoxidase-activatable PET probe) was synthesized according to Fig. 1A. Intermediate 1, which was obtained from N′,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) coupling of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid, underwent coupling reaction with intermediate 2 (SI Appendix, Scheme S1) using N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC) hydrochloride and hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) to give compound 3. Direct fluorination of compound 3, however, did not result in the desired compound since it decomposed under fluorinating conditions. After screening for different protective groups, we found tert-butyloxycarbonyl (Boc) to be suitable for protection of compound 3. Both hydroxyl and imine groups were protected to give intermediate 4, which underwent fluorination and subsequent deprotection with 1 M HCl to give the final product 19F-MAPP. Intermediate 4 was used as precursor for the subsequent radiolabeling optimization.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Chemical synthesis. (A) Synthesis of nonradioactive 19F-MAPP. DCM = dichloromethane; DMF = dimethylformamide; NEt3 = triethylamine; rt, room temperature; THF = tetrahydrofuran; NHS = N-hydroxysuccinimide; EDC.HCl = 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbo-diimide; DMAP = 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine; TBAF = tetrabutylammonium fluoride. (B) Conditions of automated synthesis of 18F-MAPP. (1) [18F]-fluoride/TBAB, CH3CN, 70 °C, 10 min; (2) HCl, CH3CN, 70 °C, 17 min.

Radiochemistry.

Optimization for radiolabeling.

The synthesis of 18F-MAPP consists of 2 steps: radiolabeling and Boc deprotection (Fig. 1B). Starting from precursor 4, we first optimized the labeling step from solvents, bases, and temperature. The labeling was initially conducted with Krytofix 222 (K222)/K2CO3 as a phase transfer catalyst (PTC) in dimethyl sulfoxide at 90 °C for 10 min. These conditions resulted in multiple radioproducts, decomposition of the starting material, and, ultimately, low radiochemical yield of the desired product (23.5%). Further experiments were conducted with tetrabutylammonium bicarbonate (TBAB) as the PTC in MeCN at 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C (SI Appendix, Table S1). We found that the TBAB and MeCN combination at 70 °C resulted in reasonable yields (56.6%) with minimal decomposition of the starting material. Following 18F labeling, the Boc deprotection step was first conducted with 0.4 mmol aqueous HCl at 95 °C added directly to the labeling reaction mixture without any prior purification. The formation of 18F-MAPP was monitored by radio–high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) at 5, 15, and 30 min, showing the formation of the desired 18F-labeled product quantitatively at 30 min (SI Appendix, Table S2, entries 1–3). The reaction rate increased by raising the HCl concentration but decomposition or defluorination was observed (SI Appendix, Table S2, entry 5). In the end, we identified 0.7 mmol HCl at 70 °C for 17 min as the appropriate Boc deprotection conditions for the following automated synthesis. The radio-HPLC chromatogram of the optimized labeling and deprotection steps before purification showed clean radiochemistry profiles (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). SI Appendix, Fig. S1B demonstrates the radio-HPLC chromatogram of 18F-MAPP before and after purification.

Automated synthesis of 18F-MAPP.

With the optimized radiolabeling and deprotection conditions, the synthesis of 18F-MAPP was then moved into the automated synthesis module (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). The optimization results of automated synthesis of 18F-MAPP (SI Appendix, Table S3) showed that the 2-step synthesis was completed in ∼80 min with a total radiochemical yield of 47% after decay correction. Subsequent syntheses were conducted with these conditions.

After automated synthesis followed by HPLC purification, the chemical purity of 18F-MAPP was confirmed by the disappearance of the precursor 4 peak (tR = 7.69 ± 0.059 min) and the formation of a new peak (tR = 2.70 ± 0.074 min). The final product was collected according to the radiochromatogram and ultraviolet/visible (UV/Vis) chromatogram at 254 nm (SI Appendix, Fig. S1C and Table S4). The radiochemical identity of 18F-MAPP was confirmed by coinjection with the reference compound 19F-MAPP (SI Appendix, Fig. S1D and Table S4) and comparing the UV/Vis absorbance of 18F-MAPP (SI Appendix, Fig. S1E) scaled to match that of 19F-MAPP (SI Appendix, Fig. S1F). After HPLC purification, no free 18F ions were detected (SI Appendix, Fig. S1D). The molar activity of 18F-MAPP was 471.7 ± 146.7 mCi/μmol, computed using a standard curve relating UV absorption response to the mass of the nonradioactive 19F-MAPP (SI Appendix, Fig. S1G). The final pH of 18F-MAPP in an administering formulation (0.5% [wt/vol] sodium ascorbate in saline) was between 5 and 6. The log P of 18F-MAPP was measured as ∼0.42 (SI Appendix, Table S5).

Stability of 18F-MAPP.

The 18F-MAPP was stored in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and aliquots at different time points were injected to a radio-HPLC. As shown in Fig. 2A, a less polar peak formed over time, indicating gradual decomposition of 18F-MAPP at room temperature. We hypothesized that the oxygen dissolved in PBS caused the degradation of 18F-MAPP. Therefore, the radical scavenger, sodium ascorbate (0.5% wt/vol) in saline was used for formulation. Subsequently, 18F-MAPP was stable for at least 4 h at room temperature in PBS (Fig. 2B). The plasma stability of the formulated 18F-MAPP was also evaluated by incubating the radioprobe and mouse plasma at 37 °C. The peak integration of 18F-MAPP in radio-HPLC confirmed the stability of 18F-MAPP (>93%) over 4 h in plasma (Fig. 2C). Both PBS and plasma test solutions were exposed to air without removal of oxygen dissolved in the solutions.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Stability of 18F-MAPP and its cytotoxicity. Relative intensity of 18F-MAPP detected by a preparative radio-HPLC detector showed that (A) storage of 18F-MAPP in PBS at room temperature degraded over time. (B) The 18F-MAPP was stable up to 4 h at room temperature when stored in 0.5% Na ascorbate (wt/vol) in saline. (C) Stability of 18F-MAPP incubated with plasma at 37 °C, 93% over 4 h (n = 4). (D) Cell toxicity of 19F-MAPP incubated with RAW cells using the MTT assay. No cytotoxicity was observed from the radioprobe itself or after being activated by MPO. The raw cells were stimulated by LPS (3 and 24 h, respectively) to generate MPO (n = 2 × 3 times of measurement for each).

Cytotoxicity.

The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl) 2,5-diphenyl-tetrazoilum bromide (MTT) assay with RAW 264.5 cells showed that there was no significant cytotoxicity of 19F-MAPP up to a concentration of 5 mM, which far exceeded the clinical dose (approximately nanomolar). Cells treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation to generate MPO (34) gave similar results, demonstrating that the activated products of 19F-MAPP are also not toxic to the cells (Fig. 2D).

Protein binding by activated 18F-MAPP.

We incubated 18F-MAPP with mouse plasma with or without MPO and glucose oxidase (GOX) for 60 min and then filtered it through a Biospin P-6 column to remove unbound radioprobe, followed by gel electrophoresis and autoradiography to determine if the activated radioprobe binds to proteins, which would allow the activated radioprobe to remain and accumulate at sites of activation. The less selective plant enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was used as a positive control. Strong signals were observed between 55 and 70 kDa which correspond to albumin when 18F-MAPP was incubated with MPO or HRP (Fig. 3A, lanes 4 and 5). In contradistinction, there was only minimal signal when incubated without MPO and GOX, or with GOX only (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 2). No detectable signal was observed when no plasma was added because the unbound oligomers from the radioprobe after activation by MPO was filtered by the size exclusion column (Fig. 3A, lane 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Validation of 18F-MAPP binding to proteins in vitro and in vivo. (A) Autoradiography demonstrates 18F-MAPP binding to proteins in plasma after gel electrophoresis. Lane 4 with MPO and lane 5 with HRP showed strong signals compared with controls without MPO/HRP or plasma (n = 3). (B) PET imaging of Matrigel embedded with human MPO and GOX or GOX only as control (B, 1). The uptake of 18F-MAPP is linearly proportional to the amount of human MPO embedded in the Matrigel (n = 3 for each amount of MPO) (B, 2).

Matrigel implantation animal experiment.

We first evaluated 18F-MAPP in vivo in Matrigel implantation animal experiments similar to those described in (34) to evaluate sensitivity to exogenous human MPO. The standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio on the MPO-containing side was 3- to 4.5-fold higher than that of the control side without MPO (Fig. 3 B, 1) and 15- to 19-fold higher in contrast to muscle. To determine the sensitivity of 18F-MAPP to MPO, different amounts of MPO (0, 15, 30 μL) were embedded in the gel. We observed a linear increase in the SUV in direct proportion to the amount of MPO embedded (Fig. 3 B, 2). In a separate experiment to study the dynamic change of 18F-MAPP in vivo, we found that 18F-MAPP uptake in the MPO gel increased faster over time than that of the control gel without MPO (Fig. 4A), and the SUV ratio was 2.3- to 2.5-fold higher. This ratio was lower than that obtained from static imaging because the metabolism of the mice slowed down under the prolonged anesthesia during the dynamic imaging experiment, compared with the static imaging experiment in which the mice were allowed to resume normal activity after 18F-MAPP injection until imaging.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Biodistribution of 18F-MAPP. (A) Dynamic study of 18F-MAPP uptake in MPO gel and control gel for 3 h. Signal in the MPO (15 μL) gel increased over time, while signal in the control gel remained low and decreased after 2 h. (B and C) The dynamic organ distribution and elimination of 18F-MAPP over 3 h. Kidney is the major organ to excrete the radioprobe. (D) Biodistribution of 18F-MAPP in the major organs of mice at 3 h after injection. Kidney, liver, and intestine have higher uptake of 18F-MAPP compared with the other organs (n = 3). (E) SUV comparison between 18F-FLT and 18F-MAPP demonstrated that 18F-MAPP can cross the blood–brain barrier (P = 0.0095), while 18F-FLT does not cross the BBB (n = 3). (F) Blood half-life of 18F-MAPP (n = 2). **P < 0.01.

Biodistribution.

Biodistribution from dynamic imaging or necropsy at 3 h after 18F-MAPP injection (Fig. 4 BD) demonstrated that kidneys are the major organ to excrete 18F-MAPP and had the highest uptake of 18F-MAPP over 3 h, followed by liver and intestine. Of note, brain uptake was 3-fold higher compared with that of 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT), which does not cross an intact blood–brain barrier (BBB) (35), revealing that 18F-MAPP can cross the BBB (Fig. 4E). We also evaluated the first pass uptake of 18F-MAPP in different regions of the brain (SI Appendix, Fig. S3A). This showed that there was an initial increased uptake in the brain, especially in the frontoparietal lobes, followed by a decrease over the first 15 min. Subsequently, there was a slow increase over time in all regions of the brain (SI Appendix, Fig. S3B). The blood half-life of 18F-MAPP was determined by counting the radioactivity of the blood samples. Using a 2-phase exponential decay model, we found the fast-phase half-life to be 0.26 min and the slow-phase half-life to be 4.66 min (Fig. 4F).

Paw CFA inflammation and treatment tracking.

We next evaluated 18F-MAPP in a mouse model of inflammation using complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA). CFA can induce acute inflammation (36) and generate MPO at the sites of inflammation (37, 38). This allows us to evaluate whether 18F-MAPP is responsive to endogenously generated MPO. We injected CFA emulsion to induce inflammation in one forepaw of the mouse and used PBS on the other forepaw as control. The 18F-MAPP uptake in the CFA-containing forepaw was 4 times higher than that in the PBS-injected forepaw, further demonstrating 18F-MAPP’s ability to report active inflammation (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Specificity and efficacy of 18F-MAPP in CFA paw inflammation model. (A) The 18F-MAPP uptake on the CFA-injected side was 4 times higher than that on the PBS-injected side. The CFA emulsion (CFA:PBS = 1:1) or PBS only was injected to the dorsal forepaws of the mouse, and 18F-MAPP was administered after 24 h (n = 3). (B) Comparison of 18F-MAPP uptake in mice treated with the specific MPO inhibitor PF-1355 to that of the vehicle-treated control mice. The treated and control mice were paired and imaged side by side 24 h after CFA injection. (Left) Mice treated with the MPO inhibitor PF-1355 (50 mg/kg) 1 h after CFA injection and every 6 h afterward. (Right) Mice treated with vehicle. (C) SUVR analysis (SUV ratio between CFA-injected and PBS-injected paws) showed that in the PF-1355-treated mice, MPO activity was inhibited by 57% (n = 3 per group). **P < 0.001.

To evaluate the specificity of 18F-MAPP, we treated the CFA mice with either an MPO-specific irreversible inhibitor, PF-1355 (15, 23), or with vehicle. Uptake of 18F-MAPP in the treated group decreased significantly compared with that of the control group as the result of the MPO activity inhibited by PF-1355 after accounting for the contralateral PBS-injected paw as control, using SUV ratios (SUVR) between the 2 sides (Fig. 5B). The mean inhibition was 57% (Fig. 5C and SI Appendix, Table S6), which matched previous ex vivo determination of PF-1355 inhibition on MPO activity of about 50% (15). The SUVs of the PBS-injected paws were low and similar to vehicle or PF-1355 treatment (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). These data revealed that 18F-MAPP is specific and able to report MPO activity and can be used to monitor the treatment effect of MPO-targeted therapeutic drugs and to report the inflammatory response.

Myocardial infarction.

As MPO is implicated in many cardiovascular diseases, we next evaluated 18F-MAPP in a mouse model of myocardial infarction (MI). The 18F-MAPP uptake in the infarct was markedly higher than that in the noninfarcted myocardium (Fig. 6A). Autoradiography of the ex vivo heart slices showed strong 18F-MAPP uptake in the infarcted tissues compared with that of heart slices without infarction (Fig. 6B). In an MPO-deficient mouse with MI, no increased 18F-MAPP uptake compared with wild-type myocardium without MI was observed (Fig. 6C), further demonstrating the specificity of 18F-MAPP for MPO. In contrast, in the infarcted myocardium of wild-type mice, there was a more than 4-fold increased uptake compared with noninfarcted myocardium (Fig. 6C).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The 18F-MAPP PET imaging of MI. (A) The 18F-MAPP uptake in wild-type mice with MI is much higher than that without MI. (B) Autoradiography of the heart slices with or without MI. The signals of heart slices 1, 2, and 3 with MI from autoradiography corresponded to that of the tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining, while no detectable signal was observed from the heart slices without MI. (C) Comparison of the heart uptake of 18F-MAPP between wild-type (WT) mice without MI, WT mice with MI, and a MPO-deficient (MPO-KO) mouse with MI (n = 3 for WT mice with or without MI, n =1 for MPO-KO, P = 0.029 between WT with MI and without MI). *P < 0.05.

Discussion

Imaging inflammation is challenging because inflammation can cause both damage and repair. So far, no clinically available imaging agents can specifically differentiate either damaging or reparative inflammation. For example, phagocyte imaging with nanoparticles reports both damaging and reparative cells in myocardial infarction (39). Translocator protein imaging can detect active microglia and macrophages but does not inform whether these cells are actively damaging the tissue or participating in repair (40). Metabolic imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) similarly also reports both types of active inflammation and is limited in the brain and heart due to the high glucose avidity of these organs. On the other hand, MPO is a specific biomarker of damaging inflammation highly expressed by proinflammatory neutrophils and M1-type microglia and microphages but not by anti-inflammatory M2-type microglia and macrophages (9, 41, 42). Indeed, combining MPO-Gd imaging with nanoparticle phagocyte imaging allowed both damaging and reparative inflammation to be tracked over time (39). Until now, imaging MPO activity required the use of agents that have limited translational potential due to issues such as specificity, depth of penetration, low detection sensitivity, potential toxicity, and inability to cross the blood–brain barrier. Here we described 18F-MAPP, which overcomes these limitations for reporting MPO activity in vivo. This radioprobe is highly specific and sensitive at very low doses, is nontoxic, and crosses the blood–brain barrier. We have optimized the synthesis and produced the radioprobe by reproducible automated synthesis with satisfactory radiochemical yield, making it suitable for clinical translation in the near future.

The development of therapeutics targeting the inflammatory response and pathways demands potent noninvasive methods to detect the efficacy of these emerging drugs. Besides the aforementioned imaging methods to detect MPO activity, a 11C-labeled MPO inhibitor, [11C]AZD3241, that can enter monkey brains was reported for MPO imaging (43). However, the half-life of 11C is short (t1/2 = 20.4 min), and no selectivity and binding affinity of the agent have been revealed. Furthermore, inhibitor-based imaging agents might saturate the binding sites of the enzyme and interrupt its function and may not accurately report on enzyme activity, only its presence. Given the presence of endogenous MPO inhibitors, reporting merely on the presence of MPO may overestimate the location and degree of inflammation; 18F-MAPP is a specific substrate, in which MPO oxidizes the 5-hydroxytryptophan moiety of 18F-MAPP at the sites of inflammation (34). This causes free radicals to form and bind to proteins, causing local retention of the activated radioprobe (Fig. 3). Therefore, unlike inhibitor-based imaging agents, 18F-MAPP does not interrupt the enzymatic function of MPO. Compared with the chelated MPO-Gd for MRI and its SPECT analogs, which provide a signal ratio between diseased and normal tissue of about 2-fold (29, 33), 18F-MAPP has an improved sensitivity of 4-fold. Furthermore, because PET allows for quantification of the radioactivity and given that 18F-MAPP’s uptake is directly proportional to MPO activity (Fig. 3B), 18F-MAPP can be used to quantify the degree of MPO activity in vivo. To accomplish this, a standard curve similar to Fig. 3 B, 2 may be generated and used to convert SUV to MPO. Because the image signal is dependent on the rate of delivery and oxidative retention by MPO, it is important to perform the in vivo experiments under the same timing conditions as those of the calibration experiment. In humans, the situation would be more complicated as individual variations in metabolism would affect the standard curve. Thus, quantitation in humans likely will require more complex modeling and will need additional data such as measuring blood levels of 18F-MAPP radioactivity over time. Finally, 18F-MAPP is able to accurately report on the degree of MPO inhibition when an irreversible MPO inhibitor is used to decrease inflammation in the paw inflammation model. Thus, this radioprobe would be a useful tool for drug development.

We found an increased brain uptake of 18F-MAPP compared with 18F-FLT (Fig. 4E), indicating that 18F-MAPP can cross the blood–brain barrier. Evaluation of the uptake pattern in the brain (SI Appendix, Fig. S3) showed 2 phases of uptake in the brain. This pattern does not mirror that of blood uptake level, and thus, blood level does not explain the observation in the brain. The early phase of increased uptake is likely due to passive crossing of the blood–brain barrier, while the later increased uptake may be due to a transporter, such as an amino acid transporter, as MAPP contains moieties that resemble aromatic amino acids such as tryptophan. When combined with the increased sensitivity of PET imaging, this technology could open up new applications to image and study neurological diseases that have little to no blood–brain barrier breakdown, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Another potential application of 18F-MAPP PET imaging is in cardiovascular diseases. In atherosclerosis, MPO is overexpressed by activated macrophages and macrophage-derived foam cells (44, 45) and is found in vulnerable plaques that may rupture (11). We and others have found that MPO imaging can identify highly inflamed plaques (46) and track treatment effects (47) in atherosclerotic plaques in rabbit and mouse models. We have also demonstrated the utility of 18F-MAPP in MI imaging in this study. The increased sensitivity of 18F-MAPP could enable the detection of damaging inflammation in many cardiovascular and neurological diseases at an earlier stage than currently possible. Such early detection would allow early treatment before irreversible damage occurs. Therefore, owing to the low dose needed for PET imaging and with its high sensitivity, specificity, stability, and favorable biodistribution and pharmacokinetics, 18F-MAPP is a promising translational candidate to monitor MPO activity and damaging inflammation in patients.

Methods

Synthesis of Nonradioactive Compound 19F-MAPP.

The nonradioactive compound 19F-MAPP was synthesized according to the synthetic route shown in Fig. 1A. The final step was purified by preparative HPLC to give the desired compound 19F-MAPP. The important intermediates and final compound were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Additional details are given in SI Appendix, SI Methods.

Radiochemistry.

The 18F-MAPP was synthesized according to the synthetic route shown in Fig. 1B. Automated synthesis of 18F-MAPP was carried out on the Synthra RNplus synthesizer (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). The automated synthesis took about 80 min, and the radiochemical yield of 47% was obtained after decay correction. Additional details are given in SI Appendix, SI Methods.

The 18F-MAPP Characterization Experiments.

We measured the lipophilicity of 18F-MAPP by measuring the log P in a 1:1 mixture of 1-octanol and water. The specific activity was calculated using a standard curve relating 19F-MAPP mass to UV absorption response. The pH of the final 18F-MAPP in an administering formulation of PBS containing 0.5% (wt/vol) of sodium ascorbate was measured using pH indicator strips, demonstrating pH 5–6 from triplicates (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). Cytotoxicity of 19F-MAPP was evaluated using RAW 264.7 cells with and without the presence of MPO using the MTT reduction assay. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with Escherichia coli LPS for 3 and 24 h, respectively, to generate MPO (34). Stability in plasma was measured by incubating 18F-MAPP (∼300 μCi) at 37 °C for 0 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h in mouse plasma. Protein binding of 18F-MAPP was determined by incubating the radioprobe (∼500 μCi) with bovine serum albumin (10 μL, 20 mg/mL), glucose (3 μL, 1g/mL), GOX (3 μL, 1 mg/mL), and MPO (5 μL, 2 mg/mL)/HRP (1 μL, 1 mg/mL) in PBS (total volume of 70 μL) at 37 °C for 60 min. Mixtures without MPO, MPO and GOX, or albumin were performed as control. The reaction mixture was filtered through Biospin P-6 columns (Bio-Rad) to remove unbound radioprobe, followed by gel electrophoresis at 150 V for 50 min. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution were determined after systemic injection of 18F-MAPP via the tail vein of the C57BL/6J mice; blood samples were performed at different time points to determine clearance rate of 18F-MAPP from the blood. The major organs of the mice were harvested after 3 h, and the radioactivity was assayed with a gamma counter (1480 Wizard 3, PerkinElmer). Additional details are given in SI Appendix, SI Methods.

PET-CT Imaging Experiments.

This study was approved by and in compliance with Massachusetts General Hospital’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Six- to ten-week-old female C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories) were used for all animal experiments. PET imaging was performed on a Siemens Inveon PET-CT scanner. The mouse was intravenously (i.v.) injected with 300–800 μCi of 18F-MAPP under anesthesia (∼2% isoflurane in oxygen).

Matrigel implantation experiment.

Three hundred microliters of a 1:1 mixture of Matrigel and minimal essential medium containing a combination of GOX and/or MPO was injected subcutaneously (s.c.) into the ventral aspect of the thighs of the C57BL/6J mice. After 30 min, 300–600 μCi of 18F-MAPP was injected i.v. in the bore of the PET scanner, and the mouse was imaged for 3 h for dynamic study or for 30 min 2 h postinjection.

Complete Freund’s adjuvant inflammation and treatment tracking.

C57BL/6J mice were injected s.c. with a 1:1 emulsion of CFA:PBS (40 μL of total volume) on the dorsal side of one forepaw under isoflurane anesthesia. PBS (40 μL) was injected on the other forepaw as control. In another experiment, mice were administered with PF-1355 (50 mg/kg) by oral gavage 1 h after the CFA injection with 3 more doses given every 6 h thereafter. The control group was treated with vehicle (10 mL/kg) in a similar fashion. After 24 h, 300–400 μCi of 18F-MAPP were injected intravenously. Treated and untreated mice were paired and imaged side by side 2 h after radioprobe injection.

Myocardial infarction.

MI was induced in C57BL/6J and MPO-deficient mice. Forty-eight hours after MI induction, 700–800 μCi of 18F-MAPP were i.v. injected through the tail vein, and the mouse was imaged 3 h after administration. PET imaging of the heart was performed similar to what was described above. After PET imaging, the mice were killed, and organs were harvested for gamma well counting and autoradiography (heart only). Volumes of interest (VOI) were manually drawn for SUV quantification of the images in Inveon Research Workplace. For brain image analysis, VOIs were drawn within different regions of the brain while avoiding the ventricles and major blood vessels. Additional details are given in SI Appendix, SI Methods.

Statistical Analysis.

Data are shown as mean ± SEM. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Additional details are given in SI Appendix, SI Methods.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R01 NS103998), the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, and Pfizer. C.W. was supported by a Research Scientist Award from the American Society of Neuroradiology. We thank Neil Vasdev and Timothy Shoup for their assistance with the initial radiochemistry experiments.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement: This study was partly funded by a research grant from Pfizer. L.B., J.C., and K.M. are employees of Pfizer. However, Pfizer did not influence the analysis or interpretation of the data. C.W., E.K., and J.W.C. have filed a patent application on the imaging technology described in the article.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1818434116/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Chinetti-Gbaguidi G., Colin S., Staels B., Macrophage subsets in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 12, 10–17 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Frangogiannis N. G., The inflammatory response in myocardial injury, repair, and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 11, 255–265 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lampron A., Elali A., Rivest S., Innate immunity in the CNS: Redefining the relationship between the CNS and its environment. Neuron 78, 214–232 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Theofilopoulos A. N., et al. , Sensors of the innate immune system: Their link to rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6, 146–156 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reitz C., Giuseppe T., Inflammation, immune system and Alzheimer’s disease: A review of the findings from the major GWAS studies. J. Mol. Genet. Med. 7, 60 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kathiresan S., Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium , Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants. Nat. Genet. 41, 334–341 (2009). Correction in: Nat. Genet.41, 762 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu C., Li F., Niu G., Chen X., PET imaging of inflammation biomarkers. Theranostics 3, 448–466 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hammoud D. A. Molecular imaging of inflammation: Current status. J. Nucl. Med. 57, 1161–1165 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Swirski F. K., et al. , Myeloperoxidase-rich Ly-6C+ myeloid cells infiltrate allografts and contribute to an imaging signature of organ rejection in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 2627–2634 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klebanoff S. J., Myeloperoxidase: Friend and foe. J. Leukoc. Biol. 77, 598–625 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van der Veen B. S., de Winther M. P., Heeringa P., Myeloperoxidase: Molecular mechanisms of action and their relevance to human health and disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11, 2899–2937 (2009). Correction in: Antioxid. Redox Signal.12, 322 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nicholls S. J., Hazen S. L., Myeloperoxidase and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25, 1102–1111 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rudolph V., et al. , Myeloperoxidase acts as a profibrotic mediator of atrial fibrillation. Nat. Med. 16, 470–474 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brennan M. L., et al. , Prognostic value of myeloperoxidase in patients with chest pain. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 1595–1604 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ali M., et al. , Myeloperoxidase inhibition improves ventricular function and remodeling after experimental myocardial infarction. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 1, 633–643 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gellhaar S., Sunnemark D., Eriksson H., Olson L., Galter D., Myeloperoxidase-immunoreactive cells are significantly increased in brain areas affected by neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Tissue Res. 369, 445–454 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gray E., Thomas T. L., Betmouni S., Scolding N., Love S., Elevated myeloperoxidase activity in white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurosci. Lett. 444, 195–198 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gray E., Thomas T. L., Betmouni S., Scolding N., Love S., Elevated activity and microglial expression of myeloperoxidase in demyelinated cerebral cortex in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 18, 86–95 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Choi D. K., et al. , Ablation of the inflammatory enzyme myeloperoxidase mitigates features of Parkinson’s disease in mice. J. Neurosci. 25, 6594–6600 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Falk R. J., Jennette J. C., Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies with specificity for myeloperoxidase in patients with systemic vasculitis and idiopathic necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 318, 1651–1657 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ruggeri R. B., et al. , Discovery of 2-(6-(5-Chloro-2-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-2-thioxo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl)acetamide (PF-06282999): A highly selective mechanism-based myeloperoxidase inhibitor for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. J. Med. Chem. 58, 8513–8528 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jucaite A., et al. , Effect of the myeloperoxidase inhibitor AZD3241 on microglia: A PET study in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 138, 2687–2700 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zheng W., et al. , PF-1355, a mechanism-based myeloperoxidase inhibitor, prevents immune complex vasculitis and anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 353, 288–298 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gross S., et al. , Bioluminescence imaging of myeloperoxidase activity in vivo. Nat. Med. 15, 455–461 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goiffon R. J., Martinez S. C., Piwnica-Worms D., A rapid bioluminescence assay for measuring myeloperoxidase activity in human plasma. Nat. Commun. 6, 6271 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang N., Francis K. P., Prakash A., Ansaldi D., Enhanced detection of myeloperoxidase activity in deep tissues through luminescent excitation of near-infrared nanoparticles. Nat. Med. 19, 500–505 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Panizzi P., et al. , Oxazine conjugated nanoparticle detects in vivo hypochlorous acid and peroxynitrite generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 15739–15744 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shepherd J., et al. , A fluorescent probe for the detection of myeloperoxidase activity in atherosclerosis-associated macrophages. Chem. Biol. 14, 1221–1231 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen J. W., Querol Sans M., Bogdanov A. Jr, Weissleder R., Imaging of myeloperoxidase in mice by using novel amplifiable paramagnetic substrates. Radiology 240, 473–481 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang J., et al. , Methods for measuring myeloperoxidase activity toward assessing inhibitor efficacy in living systems. J. Leukoc. Biol. 99, 541–548 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Albadawi H., et al. , Spinal cord inflammation: Molecular imaging after thoracic aortic ischemia reperfusion injury. Radiology 282, 202–211 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang Y., et al. , Myeloperoxidase nuclear imaging for epileptogenesis. Radiology 278, 822–830 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Querol Sans M., Chen J. W., Weissleder R., Bogdanov A. A. Jr, Myeloperoxidase activity imaging using (67)Ga labeled substrate. Mol. Imaging Biol. 7, 403–410 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rodríguez E., Nilges M., Weissleder R., Chen J. W., Activatable magnetic resonance imaging agents for myeloperoxidase sensing: Mechanism of activation, stability, and toxicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 168–177 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen W., et al. , Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: Comparison with 18F-FDG. J. Nucl. Med. 46, 945–952 (2005). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fehrenbacher J. C., Vasko M. R., Duarte D. B., Models of inflammation: Carrageenan- or complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)–induced edema and hypersensitivity in the rat. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 56, 5.4.1–5.4.4 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chagas P. M., da Cruz Weber Fulco B., Pesarico A. P., Roehrs J. A., Nogueira C. W., Effectiveness of bis(phenylimidazoselenazolyl) diselenide on a mouse model of inflammatory nociception. Biomed. Pharmacother. 96, 56–63 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Okuda K., et al. , New anthranilic acid derivative, EAntS-GS, attenuates Freund’s complete adjuvant-induced acute pain in rats. J. Surg. Res. 175, 265–270 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Keliher E. J., et al. , Polyglucose nanoparticles with renal elimination and macrophage avidity facilitate PET imaging in ischaemic heart disease. Nat. Commun. 8, 14064 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen M. K., Guilarte T. R., Translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO): Molecular sensor of brain injury and repair. Pharmacol. Ther. 118, 1–17 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bradley P. P., Christensen R. D., Rothstein G., Cellular and extracellular myeloperoxidase in pyogenic inflammation. Blood 60, 618–622 (1982). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Scholz W., et al. , Initial human myeloid/dendritic cell progenitors identified by absence of myeloperoxidase protein expression. Exp. Hematol. 32, 270–276 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Johnström P., et al. , Development of rapid multistep carbon-11 radiosynthesis of the myeloperoxidase inhibitor AZD3241 to assess brain exposure by PET microdosing. Nucl. Med. Biol. 42, 555–560 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sugiyama S., et al. , Macrophage myeloperoxidase regulation by granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in human atherosclerosis and implications in acute coronary syndromes. Am. J. Pathol. 158, 879–891 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Libby P., Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 420, 868–874 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ronald J. A., et al. , Enzyme-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging targeting myeloperoxidase identifies active inflammation in experimental rabbit atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation 120, 592–599 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rashid I., et al. , Myeloperoxidase is a potential molecular imaging and therapeutic target for the identification and stabilization of high-risk atherosclerotic plaque. Eur. Heart J. 39, 3301–3310 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES