Skip to main content
ESMO Open logoLink to ESMO Open
editorial
. 2019 Jun 12;4(Suppl 3):e000501. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000501

New emerging targets in cancer immunotherapy beyond CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1: Introducing an “ESMO Open – Cancer Horizons” Series

Matteo Lambertini 1,2,, Matthias Preusser 3, Christoph C Zielinski MD 4
PMCID: PMC6579570  PMID: 31275617

The ability of tumour cells to escape the surveillance and elimination by the immune system represents one of the hallmarks of cancer.1 2 This concept of immune control against cancer development, recognised more than 60 years ago by Paul Ehrlich, has recently led to the development of novel different treatment approaches (ie, cancer immunotherapy) aiming to reinvigorate the capability of the immune system to recognise and eliminate tumour cells.3 For this purpose, while the use of tumour antigenic material as a cancer vaccine has not proven to be particularly successful so far,4 the advent of therapies able to inactivate inhibitory immune receptors (ie, immune checkpoints) leading to a subsequent increased anti-tumour response has radically changed the natural history of many malignancies including of several aggressive and orphan diseases.

The immunotherapy tsunami has started with the advent of ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody blocking the immune checkpoint cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma.5 The subsequent introduction of other antibodies blocking the immune checkpoints programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), including pembrolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab and atezolizumab, has further generated a major impact on the prognosis of patients with many solid tumours and haematological malignancies.6 More recently, combination strategies with direct (ie, reducing tumour burden) or indirect (ie, increasing tumour immunogenicity) anti-tumour effects have shown to be possible approaches to improve at a greater extent the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.3 Specifically, concurrent administration of chemotherapy with the available checkpoint inhibitors7–11 as well as combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade12–14 have already proved to be highly effective in phase III clinical trials.

Nevertheless, despite the significant success of these approaches, not all treated patients derive benefit from the use of the currently available immunotherapy-based treatments, and in those with initial tumour response, disease progression can occur.15 Indeed, primary tumour refractoriness as well as acquired tumour resistance to the available immune checkpoint inhibitors is one of the major challenges to overcome in the field of cancer immunotherapy.16 In addition, these treatments can lead to the development of several adverse events that can involve all organs and, in some cases, may be very serious and even lethal.17 Recently, many new inhibitory or stimulatory molecules have been identified as potential targets to overcome these issues for further improving the ability of the immune system to eradicate cancer cells.18 19 With a series of mini-reviews on this topic, ‘ESMO Open—Cancer Horizons’ aims at providing an update of the most interesting and upcoming targets in cancer immunotherapy highlighting their biological mechanism, the existing targeted agents under investigation and their current stage of clinical development.

Footnotes

Contributors: All authors contributed in writing this editorial.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: ML served as a consultant for Teva and received honoraria from Theramex outside the submitted work.

Patient consent for publication: Not required.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H, et al. . Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat Immunol 2002;3:991–8. 10.1038/ni1102-991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646–74. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zappasodi R, Merghoub T, Wolchok JD. Emerging concepts for immune checkpoint blockade-based combination therapies. Cancer Cell 2018;33:581–98. 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li L, Goedegebuure SP, Gillanders WE. Preclinical and clinical development of neoantigen vaccines. Ann Oncol 2017;28(suppl_12):xii11–17. 10.1093/annonc/mdx681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, et al. . Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:1889–94. 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sharpe AH, Pauken KE. The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway. Nat Rev Immunol 2018;18:153–67. 10.1038/nri.2017.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. . Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2040–51. 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. . Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2078–92. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. . Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2288–301. 10.1056/NEJMoa1716948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Horn L, Mansfield AS, Szczęsna A, et al. . First-line Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2220–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1809064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. . Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2108–21. 10.1056/NEJMoa1809615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. . Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1345–56. 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu T-E, Pluzanski A, et al. . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2093–104. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1277–90. 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bonavida B, Chouaib S. Resistance to anticancer immunity in cancer patients: potential strategies to reverse resistance. Ann Oncol 2017;28:457–67. 10.1093/annonc/mdw615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sharma P, Hu-Lieskovan S, Wargo JA, et al. . Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell 2017;168:707–23. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, et al. . Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28(suppl_4):iv119–42. 10.1093/annonc/mdx225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Assal A, Kaner J, Pendurti G, et al. . Emerging targets in cancer immunotherapy: beyond CTLA-4 and PD-1. Immunotherapy 2015;7:1169–86. 10.2217/imt.15.78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Granier C, De Guillebon E, Blanc C, et al. . Mechanisms of action and rationale for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer. ESMO Open 2017;2:e000213 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES