Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Laryngoscope. 2018 Dec 24;129(7):1567–1571. doi: 10.1002/lary.27675

Implication of Fusobacterium Necrophorum in Recurrence of Peritonsillar Abscess

S Ahmed Ali 1, Kevin J Kovatch 1, Josh Smith 2, Emily L Bellile 3, John E Hanks 1, Paul T Hoff 1
PMCID: PMC6581569  NIHMSID: NIHMS995483  PMID: 30582617

Abstract

Introduction:

Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a common infectious complication of pharyngeal infection managed by otolaryngologists and emergency room physicians. Streptococcus and Fusobacterium (e.g., Fusobacterium necrophorum, FN) species are commonly isolated pathogens. The aim of this study was to determine the implication of culture results on abscess recurrence following drainage.

Methods:

Single-institution retrospective review of patients treated at the University of Michigan between 2000 and 2017. Demographic and clinical outcome data were analyzed, including treatment details, culture data, and recurrence.

Results:

156 of the 990 patients in our study developed recurrence of their abscess (16%). The age ranges most susceptible to recurrence included adolescent (22.9%) and young adult groups (17.1%). Recurrent patients were more likely to have experienced acute progression of symptoms (79% vs 71%, p = 0.03), trismus (67% vs 55%, p = 0.006), voice changes (65% vs 57%, p = 0.04) and dysphagia (72% vs 61%, p = 0.01) compared to non-recurrent patients. They were also more likely to have clinical lymphadenopathy noted on initial examination (67% vs 56%, p = 0.009). Culture data was sent for 852 patients (86%). The presence of FN was significantly more prevalent in the recurrent group (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

There is a high observed prevalence of FN species within PTA aspirates in the recurrent PTA population. PTA aspirate should be sent for anaerobic growth to screen for Fusobacterium species. In addition, follow-up and lower threshold for subsequent tonsillectomy should be considered in this at-risk group.

Keywords: Peritonsillar abscess, Intratonsillar abscess, Otolaryngology, Fusobacterium necrophorum, Streptococcus anginosus

INTRODUCTION:

Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is the most commonly occurring abscess in the head and neck region. There is an annual incidence of 30 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in the United States, or a total of approximately 45,000 cases per year1. The typical management of PTAs includes needle aspiration and drainage and is occasionally followed by formal incision and dissection of the peritonsillar space2. Adjunctive measures can include intravenous fluids, steroids, analgesic medications, and antibiotics. Although less common in contemporary times, surgical drainage or performance of quinsy tonsillectomy is occasionally performed for urgent evacuation of purulence in select patients35. Persistent disease or development of a recurrent abscess can be common, with studies describing recurrence rates ranging from 9.6% to 40%68.

Factors that have been implicated in recurrent peritonsillar abscesses included younger age (16–30 years), prior history of recurrent tonsillitis, history of prior PTA, longer hospital stay, prior hospitalization for antibiotics, and extra-peritonsillar spread on CT imaging6,7,9. The consequence of these risk factors may include greater need for follow-up or stronger consideration for tonsillectomy.

The microbiological characterization of the peritonsillar abscess has also been well-studied, albeit not in the context of recurrent disease. In a retrospective review on bacterial cultures from abscess aspirates, Mazur et al found that the most frequently isolated pathogenic monoculture was Streptococcus pyogenes9. In this retrospective review, the authors aim to characterize risk factors implicated in patients with persistent or recurrent peritonsillar abscesses with particular attention paid to the pathogens isolated from aerobic and anaerobic cultures.

METHODS:

Study Population

We performed an IRB-approved single-institution retrospective case series of patients who presented to our emergency department or outpatient clinic with suspicion for a deep neck space infection. Patients who were diagnosed with a peritonsillar or intratonsillar abscess (ITA) from 2000–2017 were included. Diagnostic criteria for the PTA included: radiologist confirmation of debris or abscess within peritonsillar space, or evacuation of purulence from peritonsillar space either via bedside procedure or operative quinsy tonsillectomy, or clinical diagnosis of early peritonsillar abscess after failed evacuation attempt. Diagnostic criteria for the ITA included: radiologist confirmation of debris or abscess within the tonsillar parenchyma, or evacuation of purulence from the intratonsillar parenchyma either via bedside procedure or operative quinsy tonsillectomy. Patients who did not have a diagnosis of PTA or ITA were excluded from the study, as were patients who had infections present within additional spaces of the neck (such as concomitant parapharpharyngeal or retropharyngeal abscesses). We excluded patients with diagnoses of viral pharyngitis or tonsillitis as interpreted from clinical reports. Herein, if there was no imaging performed or no evacuation of purulence after aspiration attempt, cellulitis was distinguished from “early” or “developing” abscess based off clinical interpretation of the treating provider. Demographics, clinical symptomatology, primary treatment modality, imaging characteristics, microbiological growth, and follow-up data were tabulated. Data were collected using clinical notes and imaging available in our electronic medical records system.

Statistical Analysis

Standard descriptive statistics were tabulated and bivariate associations with recurrent vs non-recurrent cohorts were tested with chi-square tests and t-tests where appropriate. Multivariable modeling was performed in two stages. First, all demographic, basic clinical factors and symptomology (listed in Tables 1 and 2) were considered as potential predictors of recurrence in multivariable logistic regression models. Backward selection, with alpha criteria of 0.10, was performed. Second, additional factors for which we had subsets of patient information such as WBC count, rapid mono and strep tests were tested for significance individually in addition to the parsimonious clinical model. Alpha of 0.05 was considered significant and all analyses were performed in SAS v9.4.

Table 1.

Demographics information

Patients
N = 990
Overall (n, %) No Recurrence (n, %)
N = 834
Recurrence (n, %)
N = 156
P-value
Age (mean, median, range) 24.3, 20.5, 1.2–88 24.8, 21.0, 1.2–88 21.8, 19.0, 6–65 <0.001
Age group 0–12 82 (8%) 76 (9.1%) 6 (3.8%) <0.01
Age group 13–18 253 (26%) 195 (23.3%) 58 (37%) <0.001
Age group 19–30 432 (44%) 358 (43%) 74 (47%) 0.30
Age group 31–50 171 (17%) 156 (19%) 15 (9.6%) <0.001
Age group 51+ 52 (5%) 49 (5.9%) 3 (1.9%) <0.01
Male gender 504 (51%) 426 (51%) 78 (50%) 0.80

Table 2.

Comparative clinical information for recurrent and non-recurrent groups

Patients
N = 990
Overall (n, %) No Recurrence (n, %)
N = 834
Recurrence (n, %)
N = 156
P-value
Duration of
symptoms
≤3 days 293 (30%) 256 (31%) 37 (23%) 0.12
4–7 days 479 (48%) 402 (48%) 77 (49%) 0.81
>7 days 218 (22%) 176 (21%) 42 (27%) 0.13
Fever 427 (43%) 363 (44%) 64 (41%) 0.56
Sore throat 990 (100%) 834 (100%) 156 (100%) -
Worsening of
symptoms
716 (72%) 592 (71%) 124 (79%) 0.03
Otalgia 577 (58%) 478 (57%) 99 (63%) 0.15
Trismus 561 (57%) 457 (55%) 104 (67%) 0.006
Cough 58 (6%) 51 (6%) 7 (5%) 0.43
Voice change 574 (58%) 472 (57%) 102 (65%) 0.04
Dysphagia 624 (63%) 512 (61%) 112 (72%) 0.01
Dyspnea 47 (5%) 40 (5%) 7 (5%) 0.87
Anorexia 468 (47%) 387 (46%) 81 (52%) 0.21
Neck pain 192 (19%) 160 (19%) 32 (21%) 0.70
Lymphadenopathy 573 (58%) 468 (56%) 105 (67%) 0.009

RESULTS:

Our study initially identified 1,335 patients with a diagnosis of PTA or ITA. Patients with diagnoses of viral pharyngitis, tonsillitis, or other concomitant deep neck space infections, were excluded. From this group, 990 patients were remaining. Demographics information for recurrent and non-recurrent groups are shown in Table 1. In all, 156 of the 990 patients developed recurrence of their abscess (16%). Patients were further sub-categorized into age-ranges; children were categorized as 0–12 years, adolescents into 13–18 years, young adults into 19–30 years, and adults were split into 31–50 and 50+ years as noted. The age ranges most susceptible to recurrent abscesses included the adolescent (23% recurrence rate) and the young adult groups (17% recurrence rate). Recurrent abscesses were uncommon in children (7.3% and the 50+ age group (5.8%).

Clinical information for the two cohorts are displayed in Table 2. There were no significant differences in duration of symptoms between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups. From a presenting symptomatology perspective, those who developed recurrences were more likely to have initially experienced acute progression of symptoms (79% vs 71%, p = 0.03), trismus (67% vs 55%, p = 0.006), voice changes (65% vs 57%, p = 0.04) and dysphagia (72% vs 61%, p = 0.01). They were also more likely to have clinical lymphadenopathy noted on initial examination (67% vs 56%, p = 0.009).

Objective laboratory data and culture data is demonstrated in Table 3. There was no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts in regards to elevated white blood cell (WBC) count and development of recurrence. Rapid Epstein Barr Virus testing was found to be positive in a greater proportion of non-recurrent patients (20% vs 9%, p = 0.03). Overall, 494 (50%) patients were treated with Augmentin, 493 (50%) with clindamycin, and 3 with a penicillin (0.4%) at their initial visitation. There was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients placed on Augmentin who experienced a recurrence versus those placed on clindamycin (17% versus 15% respectively, p = 0.39).

Table 3.

Objective information for recurrent and non-recurrent groups

Patients Overall (n, %) No Recurrence (n, %) Recurrence (n, %) P-value
White blood cell
count (N=734)
Normal (<11.0) 184 (25%) 161 (26%) 23 (20%) 0.17
Elevated (>11.0) 550 (75%) 458 (74%) 92 (80%) 0.19
Rapid tests
Mononucleosis
(N=451)
Positive 83 (18%) 76 (20%) 7 (9%) 0.03
Streptococcus,
(N=694)
Positive 124 (18%) 111 (19%) 13 (13%) 0.12

Culture data is tabulated in Table 4; the microbiological data presented was obtained from the patient’s initial visit to the hospital. Among the 990 patients with peritonsillar or intratonsillar abscesses, culture data was sent for 566 patients (58%). The remaining patients either did not have purulence aspirated with drainage attempt or no culture data was sent. The presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum (FN) (67% vs 13%, p < 0.0001) were significantly more prevalent in the recurrent group. There was no statistically significant association with presence of Streptococcal species, Eikenella corrodens, Bacteroides fragilis, Prevotella species and Staphylococcus aureus species and recurrent PTA. While not statistically significant, there was a large proportion of patients with Streptococcus anginosus (SA) with recurrent PTA (n = 32, 23%).

Table 4.

Culture data for recurrent and non-recurrent groups obtained from initial hospital visit

Patients
N = 566
Overall (n, %) No Recurrence (n, %),
N = 447
Recurrence (n, %),
N = 119
P-value
Any streptococcus species 203 (35%) 159 (35%) 44 (37%) 0.68
Beta-hemolytic
streptococcus group A
51 (9%) 42 (9.4%) 9 (7.6%) 0.61
Beta-hemolytic
streptococcus group C
5 (<1%) 4 (0.9%) 1 (0.8%) 0.72
Streptococcus agalactiae 3 (<1%) 2 (0.4%) 1 (0.8%) 0.13
Streptococus pneumoniae 3 (<1%) 2 (0.4%) 1 (0.8%) 0.13
Streptococcus anginosus
group
140 (24%) 108 (24%) 32 (27%) 0.51
Fusobacterium necrophorum 176 (31%) 99 (22%) 77 (65%) <0.00001
Prevotella species 67 (12%) 55 (12%) 12 (10%) 0.52
No growth of organisms 76 (9%) 68 (15%) 8 (7%) 0.005
Fusobacterium nucleatum
27 (5%) 25 (5.6%) 2 (1.7%) 0.14
Staphylococcus aureus 20 (4%) 15 (3.4%) 5 (4.2%) 0.69
Eikenella corrodens 15 (3%) 11 (2.4%) 4 (3.4%) 0.58

Further analysis of the relationship between FN and SA is demonstrated in Figure 1. For the patients for whom culture data was available, only 4% experienced recurrence in the absence of growth of FN or SA. For isolated bacteria, there was a 44% recurrence rate with presence of FN only and a 14% recurrence rate with presence of isolated SA. The recurrence rate for concomitant growth of FN and SA (42%) was similar to recurrence rates for FN only (44%).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Demonstration of overlap between Streptococcus anginosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum

A logistic regression model was utilized to assess odds of recurrence depending on isolated versus concomitant FN and SA growth as demonstrated in Table 5. This demonstrates that the odds of recurrence are significantly smaller for lack of growth of FN and SA and for the SA positive only cohorts in comparison to the cohort with growth of both FN and SA. The odds of recurrence are similar for FN positive only in comparison to FN and SA cohort.

Table 5.

Odds ratio estimates for recurrence risk with Streptococcus anginosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum.

Effect Point
Estimate
95% Wald
Confidence Limits
FN and SA negative versus FN and SA positive 0.060 0.029 0.125
FN positive only versus FN and SA positive 1.107 0.552 2.221
SA positive only versus FN and SA positive 0.234 0.102 0.537

= Fusobacterium necrophorum (FN)

= Streptococcus anginosus (SA)

DISCUSSION:

There exists a plethora of potential reasons for persistent or recurrent peritonsillar disease. Early recurrences, or persistence of disease, could be related to inadequate treatment (such as inadequate drainage of the peritonsillar space), extra-peritonsillar spread of infection, or autoimmune deficiency6,7,10. Later recurrences could be related to autoimmune deficiency or prior history of tonsillitis or pharyngitis. In this retrospective review, our results indicated that those patients with persistent or recurrent disease were more likely to have presented with acutely progressive symptoms, trismus, voice changes, dysphagia, and lymphadenopathy. These findings are likely related to the probability that those with more severe symptoms – and resultant more severe infections – were more likely to present again with symptoms and abscesses that required repeat intervention. There further appeared to be a specific age range at which patients with pharyngeal abscesses were more likely to present with recurrent disease, specifically the 13–18 age range (23% recurrence rate) and the 19–30 age range (17%). This finding may be related to previous findings in the literature that those with a history of recurrent tonsillitis were more likely to develop PTAs and recurrent PTAs6.

The relationship of pathogenic organisms to peritonsillar abscess recurrence has not been previously well-studied. Upon initial analysis – although not statistically significant - there did appear to be a potential association between Streptococcus anginosus growth and recurrent abscesses. However, further characterization demonstrated that the effect appeared to be attributable to concomitant growth of FN within those cultures. The SA group consists of morphologically similar strains including Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus constellatus9. Previous studies have demonstrated no association between streptococcal species, including SA, and recurrent peritonsillar disease11.

In this study, the presence of FN species within such a large proportion of patients with either previous peritonsillar abscesses or amongst those who eventually developed recurrent PTAs, certainly suggests a relationship between FN and difficult to eradicate peritonsillar disease. While this concept may be novel, the presence of FN within head and neck abscess aspirate is not.

Fusobacterium species, strictly anaerobic gram-negative rods, are primarily isolated from the oral cavity, although they can also be found in the abdomen and urogenital tract12. The publication of newer studies relating Fusobacterium species and head and neck infections may be related to increased awareness of the potential devastating effects of this pathogen, with resultant increased testing. In a Danish study conducted on patient specimens collected between 2010 and 2014, the authors reported that FN was present on throat swab in 516 cases per million/year in the 10–19 age range and 302 cases per million/year in the 20–29 age range13. In relation to aspirates from PTAs, FN was present in 168 and 116 cases per million/year in the 10–19 and 20–29 age ranges respectively13. Additional studies offer support for routine anaerobic testing of patients with suspected pharyngotonsillitis, citing FN as the most prevalent cause of such infections in the 15–30 age group14. A large retrospective review of 847 patients demonstrated that FN was the most frequently detected bacteria in PTA culture (present in 23% of cultures), in addition to being significantly associated with a younger patient population (median age 18 years)15. The long-term effects of FN are poorly elucidated, however there is evidence to suggest that colonization of this organism may lead to a decrease in the diversity of the tonsillar microbiome16.

The implication of FN as a pathogenic driver for recurrent peritonsillar infections and abscesses fits within the continuum of our increasing awareness of FN presence with pharyngotonsillar infections and well-established knowledge of FN generation of Lemierre syndrome17. It is thus theorized that FN acts to colonize the oropharynx and result in recurrent infections/abscesses18,19. There is increasing evidence that FN preferentially colonizes or manifests in a specific age-range; in this study we note that the age range at greatest risk for recurrence is the 13–18 category. Previous studies have demonstrated that FN-driven tonsillitis preferentially affects a similar 10–19 age category13. Similarly, the population at greatest risk for FN-driven Lemierre syndrome is in the 14–24 age range, with one study demonstrating a median age of 18 years20,21. Treatment strategies in this young patient population may need to be reconsidered. Initially, based off the findings in this study of the potential significance of certain pathogens, we would recommend that all PTA aspirate be sent for aerobic and anaerobic culture. In the event of FN growth, the literature as it pertains to antibiotic treatment and duration is largely theoretical and empiric. Penicillins, metronidazole, and clindamycin are known to have low minimal inhibitory concentrations for FN and resistance is rare14.

In the absence of pertinent clinical studies, it is difficult to make specific recommendations for treatment type and duration. There does appear to be a role for close and dedicated follow-up for these patients and possible low threshold to consider tonsillectomy. While none of the recurrent patients in our cohort with FN developed Lemierre disease, it is certainly a known and severe possibility.

Study Limitations

The limitations of this study are related to its retrospective nature. As discussed in the Methods section, the diagnosis of PTA was based off radiographic, procedural, or clinical findings. Whereas diagnoses derived from imaging or evacuation of purulence are largely objective, there is inherent bias in diagnosing an abscess in the absence of imaging findings or confirmation via evacuation of purulence from an abscess cavity. This relegates the diagnosis of “early” or “developing” abscess versus cellulitis to the treating practitioner, which can be inconsistent and potentially incorrect. Thus, this introduces the possibility that some of the recurrent PTA cases may have simply represented cellulitis at the time of initial treatment, or that the provider may have missed the abscessed cavity on intervention. Further limitations stem from the lack of standardized work-up and treatment of suspected PTA cases. This is demonstrated in the non-uniform performance of CT imaging, rapid streptococcus testing, EBV testing, and even obtainment of culture data from aspirate. While custom analyses were performed for the subset of patients who did have the aforementioned testing performed, it is difficult to determine definitive conclusions due to this non-standard work-up.

CONCLUSION:

Peritonsillar abscess is the most common neck space abscess; the clinical course and treatment results in significant patient distress, lost school/work days, and specialized care. Recurrent PTAs have been previously linked to extra-peritonsillar spread on imaging, prolonged hospital stays, prior hospitalizations, and younger age range. In this retrospective review, we describe increased prevalence of FN within PTA aspirates in the recurrent PTA population. Given this finding, it would be prudent for all practitioners to send aspirate for anaerobic growth to screen for FN. In addition, we would recommend close and dedicated follow-up with a low threshold to pursue tonsillectomy in this patient population. Future prospective studies can better help elucidate the ideal type of antibiotic and duration of treatment to implement.

Acknowledgements:

The authors acknowledge Barbara L. Shipman, AMLS, for assistance in the literature search and review.

Funding: Author K.J.K is supported by NIH grant T32 DC005356.

Abbreviations:

FN

Fusobacterium necrophorum

ITA

Intratonsillar abscess

PTA

Peritonsillar abscess

SA

Streptococcus anginosus

Footnotes

Conflict of Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Meeting Information: Submitted for presentation at Triological Society – Combined Sections Meeting (Coronado, CA, January 24 – 26, 2019).

Level of Evidence: 3, retrospective comparative analysis

REFERENCES:

  • 1.Albertz N, Nazar G. Peritonsillar abscess: Treatment with immediate tonsillectomy - 10 years of experience. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2012; 132:1102–1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chang BA, Thamboo A, Burton MJ, Diamond C, Nunez DA. Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016; 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Windfuhr JP, Chen YS. Immediate abscess tonsillectomy - A safe procedure? Auris Nasus Larynx 2001; 28:323–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simon LM, Matijasec JWD, Perry AP, Kakade A, Walvekar RR, Kluka EA. Pediatric peritonsillar abscess: Quinsy ie versus interval tonsillectomy. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2013; 77:1355–1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lehnerdt G, Senska K, Jahnke K, Fischer M. Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: A retrospective comparison of abscess- and elective tonsillectomy. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2005; 125:1312–1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kronenberg J, Wolf M, Leventon G. Peritonsillar abscess: Recurrence rate and the indication for tonsillectomy. American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery 1987; 8:82–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chung JH, Lee YC, Shin SY, Eun YG. Risk factors for recurrence of peritonsillar abscess. The Journal of laryngology and otology 2014; 128:1084–1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tachibana T, Orita Y, Abe-Fujisawa Iet al. Prognostic factors and effects of early surgical drainage in patients with peritonsillar abscess. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2014; 20:722–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mazur E, Czerwińska E, Korona-Głowniak I, Grochowalska A, Kozioł-Montewka M. Epidemiology, clinical history and microbiology of peritonsillar abscess. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2015; 34:549–554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wolf M, Even-Chen I, Kronenberg J. Peritonsillar abscess: Repeated needle aspiration versus incision and drainage. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 1994; 103:554–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Savolainen S, Jousimies-Somer HR, Mäkitie AA, Ylikoski JS. Peritonsillar Abscess: Clinical and Microbiologic Aspects and Treatment Regimens. Archives of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 1993; 119:521–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yusuf E, Halewyck S, Wybo I, Piérard D, Gordts F. Fusobacterium necrophorum and other Fusobacterium spp. isolated from head and neck infections: A 10-year epidemiology study in an academic hospital. Anaerobe 2015; 34:120–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bank S, Jensen A, Nielsen HM, Kristensen LH, Voldstedlund M, Prag J. Fusobacterium necrophorum findings in Denmark from 2010 to 2014 using data from the Danish microbiology database. APMIS 2016; 124:1087–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Holm K, Bank S, Nielsen H, Kristensen LH, Prag J, Jensen A. The role of Fusobacterium necrophorum in pharyngotonsillitis – A review. Anaerobe 2016; 42:89–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Klug TE, Rusan M, Fuursted K, Ovesen T. Fusobacterium necrophorum: Most prevalent pathogen in peritonsillar abscess in Denmark. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009; 49:1467–1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Prescott Atkinson T, Centor RM, Xiao Let al. Analysis of the tonsillar microbiome in young adults with sore throat reveals a high relative abundance of Fusobacterium necrophorum with low diversity. PLoS ONE 2018; 13:e0189423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Björk H, Bieber L, Hedin K, Sundqvist M. Tonsillar colonisation of Fusobacterium necrophorum in patients subjected to tonsillectomy. BMC Infectious Diseases 2015; 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Klug TE, Henriksen JJ, Rusan Met al. Antibody development to Fusobacterium necrophorum in patients with peritonsillar abscess. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2014; 33:1733–1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kjærulff AMG, Thomsen MK, Ovesen T, Klug TE. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with Fusobacterium necrophorum-positive acute tonsillitis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2015; 272:1457–1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kuppalli K, Livorsi D, Talati NJ, Osborn M. Lemierre’s syndrome due to Fusobacterium necrophorum. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2012; 12:808–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hagelskjær Kristensen L, Prag J. Lemierre’s syndrome and other disseminated Fusobacterium necrophorum infections in Denmark: A prospective epidemiological and clinical survey. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2008; 27:779–789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES