Abstract
Background
Type 1 diabetes is a serious, lifelong condition where the body’s blood glucose level increases because of the body’s inability to make insulin. An important consequence of this is the increased expression of extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibronectin and collagen 4α1, in key tissues and organs like the heart and kidneys. Diabetes is also associated with increased plasma levels of the vasoactive peptide endothelin (ET)-1. This further aggravates the expression of the ECM proteins. There are also important consequences of increased glucose and ET-1 levels in diabetes on the heart, termed diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Methods
We have previously reported the development of ET-traps, which potently and significantly reduce pathological levels of ET-1. In this study, we tested the in vivo therapeutic potential of ET-traps for type 1 diabetes using the B6 mouse model.
Results
Following subcutaneous administration of ET-traps 3 times a week, over a 2 month period, the 500 nM dose of ET-traps gave a significant reduction in collagen 4α1 expression in the heart and kidney, returning it back to control, non-diabetic levels at both the mRNA and protein levels. The expression of fibronectin mRNA is also returned to control levels with the 500 nM dose of ET-traps. The efficacy of ET-traps for type 1 diabetes was further evinced by immunohistochemistry data, echocardiography studies (measuring left ventricular systolic function and diastolic dysfunction) and a measure of urine creatinine and albumin levels. In all analyses, the 500 nM dose of ET-traps returns the different measures to control, non-diabetic levels.
Conclusion
Data from this study show that in a mouse model ET-traps have a potent and significant therapeutic effect on diabetes disease pathology. Future studies could further evaluate the use of ET-traps as a therapy for diabetes, including taking them through clinical trials.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s40200-019-00400-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: DM, Diabetes mellitus; ECM, Extracellular matrix; ET-1, Endothelin-1; ETtr, Endothelin-1 traps; FFP, Fc-fusion protein
Introduction
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease with a strong genetic component [1, 2]. T1D can occur at any age but tends to develop in childhood [3]. T1D is characterized by destruction of pancreatic β-cells, which results in absolute insulin deficiency [4]. A survey in 2014 stated that an estimated 387 million people have diabetes worldwide [5], of which T1D accounts for between 5% and 10% [6].
Elevated glucose or altered insulin sensitivity have an important effect on cellular components within the heart. In addition, there are also significant changes in the cardiac extracellular matrix (ECM) [7]. A key feature of chronic diabetes is an imbalance in the production and degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, such as fibronectin (FN) and collagen 4α1. The mechanism of increased ECM synthesis is important for the development of therapeutics, as ECM deposition is a common occurrence in chronic diabetes [8]. Research shows that high glucose-induced fibronectin synthesis, which is mediated via NF-κB and AP-1, is dependent on endothelin (ET)-1 [9]. The study by Chen et al. (2003) showed that ET receptor blockade, which inhibits ET-1 activity, prevented the high glucose-induced fibronectin synthesis. Therefore, the ET-traps would also have a positive effect in diabetes because they would potently help reduce the (increased) levels of ET-1, as has been shown by our previous work [10]. ET-1 also increases collagen 4α1 accumulation in renal mesangial cells by stimulating a chemokine and cytokine autocrine signaling loop, which involves the macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) [11].
Various studies show that ET-1 levels are significantly increased in diabetes compared to control subjects [12, 13]. Endothelial cell dysfunction is a key pathological element in the development of chronic diabetic complications [14, 15]. Endothelial cell dysfunction involves an imbalance between vasodilating and vasoconstricting substances produced by (or acting on) the endothelium [16]. Endothelial dysfunction leads to increased production and biological activity of the potent vasoconstrictor and pro-inflammatory peptide ET-1 [17].
A previous study found that chronic activation of PKC-δ in cardiac tissues is detrimental to cardiac function and may contribute to diabetic cardiomyopathy. The study by Zhiang He [18] suggested that this was due to the increased gene expression of ET-1 in the myocardium. The role of ET-1 in diabetic cardiomyopathy has been corroborated by further studies using ET antagonists [19]. These previous data show that sequestering pathologically elevated ET-1 has a positive effect on diabetic cardiomyopathy. We therefore, investigated the efficacy of ET-traps in ameliorating diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Further, diabetes mellitus is the most frequent cause of chronic kidney failure in both developed and developing countries [20]. Nephropathy is when the kidneys start to incur damage, which can ultimately lead to kidney failure. Diabetic nephropathy is a clinical syndrome characterized by albuminuria and increased creatinine levels [21, 22]. Previous studies have reported endothelin antagonism as a therapeutic tool to reduce proteinuria and delay kidney injury progression in diabetic nephropathy [23]. Hence, we also measured albumin and creatinine levels in subjects treated with different concentrations of ET-traps (which would only sequester pathologically high ET-1, without completely blocking its action).
The ET-traps are an Fc-fused molecular construct that potently bind and sequester ET-1 (as shown by our previous work [10]). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of ET-traps in type-I diabetes. For this, we looked at FN and collagen 4α1 mRNA and protein expression levels in the heart and kidneys, performed echocardiography analyses, examined the urine creatinine and albumin levels and performed immunohistochemical analyses of the heart and kidney tissues in B6 mice treated with different doses of the ET-traps.
Materials and methods
Please note, the in vivo testing work was contracted out to a University in Canada (to a laboratory with expertise in diabetes research) in order to overcome any conflicts of interest or bias in performing the experiments and analyzing the data. The in vivo testing work was performed by Professor Chakrabarti’s laboratory at the Western University, Canada.
Animal studies
All animal experiments were performed according to the Guide For the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication no. 85–23, revised in 1996). The Western University council on animal care committee reviewed and approved all experimental protocols. Male B6 mice (20-25 g) were divided into 1:control, 2:diabetes, 3:diabetes plus 250 nM ET-traps and 4:diabetes plus 500 nM ET-traps groups. Each group contained six animals, i.e. n = 6. Diabetes was induced by upto 5 intraperitoneal injections of Streptozotocin (STZ) (50 mg/kg in citrate buffer, pH 4.5, controls received the same volume of buffer) on consecutive days as previously described [24]. Hyperglycemia was confirmed by measuring blood glucose levels (at least twice) 3 days after the last STZ injection. Following confirmation of diabetes, treatment groups received 250 nM or 500 nM ET-traps via a subcutaneous injection on alternate days. The mice were maintained in a hyperglycemic state and followed up for two months (without exogenous insulin) with body weight and glucose. At the end of the study period, echocardiography was performed and 24 h urine were collected in all mice. The mice were then sacrificed and cardiac tissues, renal tissues and blood were collected. The tissues were embedded in paraffin. For histologic studies, 5 μm sections with hemotoxylin/eosin, PAS-D and trichrome stain were used, using a standard histological approach as previously described [25].
Echocardiography
As previously described by Feng et al. (2017), lightly anesthetized (1.5% inhaled isoflurane) mice were subjected to echocardiography on a warm handling platform [26]. A 40 MHz linear array transducer (MS-550D) and Vevo 2100 preclinical ultrasound system (VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada) with nominal in-plane spatial resolution of 40 μm (axial) × 80 μm (lateral) was used. M-mode and 2-D parasternal short-axis scans (133 frames/s) at the level of the papillary muscles were obtained to assess changes in left-ventricular (LV) end-systolic inner diameter (LVIDs) and LV end-diastolic inner diameter (LVIDd). LV volumes at end-diastole (LVEDV) and end-systole (LVESV) were calculated as: LVEDV = [7/(2.4 + LVIDd)] × [LVIDd3] and LVESV = [7/(2.4 + LVIDs)] × [LVIDs3]. LV fractional shortening (FS) and ejection fraction (EF) were used as indexes of cardiac contractile function and were calculated from the inner diameters as: FS [%] = (LVIDd-LVIDs)/LVIDd × 100, and EF as [%] = (LVEDV-LVESV)/LVEDV × 100, respectively. Color flow-guided, pulsed- wave (PW) Doppler recordings of the maximal early (E) and late (A) diastolic transmitral flow velocities and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) recordings of peak E′ velocity and peak A′ velocity were carried out. Mitral inflow patterns (E/A ratio) and mitral annulus velocities (E′/A’ ratio) were used to assess diastolic dysfunction [26].
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Burlington, Canada) was used to isolate RNA as previously described [27]. Chloroform was used to extract RNA, which was followed by centrifugation to separate the sample into aqueous and organic phases. RNA was recovered from the aqueous phase by isopropyl alcohol precipitation and suspended in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water. Total RNA (5 μg) was used for cDNA synthesis with high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). The resulting cDNA products were stored at −20 °C.
Real-time RT-PCR
Real-time RT-PCR was performed using the LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics Canada, Laval, Canada), as previously described [28]. For a final reaction volume of 20 μL, the following reagents were added: 10 μL SYBR Advantage qPCR Premix (Clontech, Mountain View, USA), 1 μL each of forward and reverse 10 μmol/L primers (Collagen 4α1, Fibronectin and β-actin, 7 μL H2O, and 1 μL cDNA template. The standard curve method was used to quantify the mRNA levels. Standard curves were constructed by using serially diluted standard template. The data were normalized to β-actin mRNA to account for differences in reverse transcription efficiencies and the amount of template in the reaction mixtures.
Primers used:
Mouse fibronectin primer: [forward: 5-CGGTAGGACCTTCTATTCCT-3, reverse: 5-GATACATGACCCCTTCATTG-3]
And
Mouse collagen 4α1 primer: [forward: 5-CCCTGGCTTCAAAGGTGATA-3, reverse: 5- GGGGATCCTGGTATTCCACT-3]
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Heart and Kidney tissues were homogenized with RIPA lysis buffer and tissue proteins were extracted. Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA protein assay kit (Fisher Scientific, Burlington, ON, Canada). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for Collagen IV alpha1 (Col 4α1, Cloud-Clone Corp. TX, USA) and Fibronectin (Boster Biological Technology, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Urine albumin and creatinine assay
24 h urine was collected from the animals by placing them in metabolic cages before euthanasia with care so that faeces did not contaminate the urine samples. The measurement of urine albumin and creatinine was performed using an ELISA (Albuwell M; Exocell and The Creatinine Companion, Philadelphia, PA). All procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the data were used to calculate the urine albumin/creatinine ratio as previously described [24].
Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemical staining, the de-paraffinized kidney and heart sections were antigen-retrieved in citrate buffer and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies (Abcam) used were rabbit anti-mouse FN and Col 4α1 (1:100). The slides were incubated in ImmPRESS (peroxidase) anti-rabbit IgG Reagent kit (Vector Laboratory) for 30 min, mounted, and viewed under a microscope. The methodology was as previously described [25].
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test or analysis of variance (Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference test).
Data are expressed as means ± SE. A p value of ≤0.05 was considered to be significant, and results are expressed as the average of n = 6 animals/group. The statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad) software.
Results
Our preliminary experiments confirmed that the ET-traps have a binding affinity of pico molar affinity (Fig. S1), which was analogous to our in vitro study. We then proceeded to test in vivo toxicology and bioavailability of the ET-traps. These studies showed that the ET-traps are non-toxic to the animals (B6 mouse model). Histological analyses showed no cellular damage in the heart, lung, kidney, liver, cortex and hippocampus with the higher 500 nM dose of ET-traps (Fig. S2a and S2b). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) tests showed no significant decline in liver function (Fig. S2c).
Bioavailability analyses indicated that following subcutaneous injection 3 times per week, there was a significant reduction in plasma ET-1 levels in ET-traps treated mice compared to untreated controls and a significant increase in plasma ET-traps (Fig. S3a and S3b).
ET-traps potently and significantly reduce the expression of col 4α1 in the heart of diabetic mice
We tested the efficacy of the ET-traps on ECM protein expression in an in vivo model of diabetes – the B6 mouse model. Our results show that there is a significant increase in heart Col 4α1 in diabetic mice compared to controls (Fig. 1a, b). This was found at both the mRNA and protein levels. There was a significant return of heart Col 4α1 to control (non-diabetic) levels with a 500 nM dose of ET-traps, at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 1a, b).
Fig. 1.
ET-traps potently and significantly reduce the expression of Col 4α1 in the heart of diabetic mice back to control, non-diabetic levels. a Protein expression analyses (ELISA) of Col 4α1 in B6 mouse subjects treated with or without ET-traps. Col 4α1 protein levels were significantly increased in the heart of diabetic mice at the end of the 8-week study period. This increase was absent in subjects treated with 500 nM ET-traps. b Real time PCR analysis of Col 4α1 in the heart. Col 4α1 mRNA levels were significantly increased in the heart of diabetic mice at the end of the 8-week study period. This increase was absent in subjects treated with 500 nM ET-traps. The data were normalized to β-actin mRNA to account for differences in reverse transcription efficiencies and the amount of template in the reaction mixtures. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistical significance of differences between groups was tested with Student’s t test. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered to be significant. * p ≤ 0.05 compared to non-diabetic controls, ** p ≤ 0.05 compared to diabetic subjects, n = 6, C = control, D = diabetic, 250 = 250 nM ET-traps, 500 = 500 nM ET-traps
ET-traps potently and significantly reduce the expression of col 4α1 in the kidney of diabetic mice
Analogous to the heart, there is a significant increase in kidney Col 4α1 in diabetic mice compared to non-diabetic controls (Fig. 2a, b). This was found at both the mRNA and protein levels. There was a significant return of kidney Col 4α1 to control (non-diabetic) levels with a 500 nM dose of ET-traps (administered 3 times per week over the 8 week test period), at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2a, b).
Fig. 2.
ET-traps potently and significantly reduce the expression of Col 4α1 in the kidney of diabetic mice back to control, non-diabetic levels. a Protein expression analyses (ELISA) of Col 4α1 in B6 mouse subjects treated with or without ET-traps. Col 4α1 protein levels were significantly increased in the kidneys of diabetic mice at the end of the 8-week study period. This increase was absent in subjects treated with 500 nM ET-traps. b Real time PCR analysis of Col 4α1 in the kidney. Col 4α1 mRNA levels were significantly increased in the kidneys of diabetic mice at the end of the 8-week study period. This increase was absent in subjects treated with 500 nM ET-traps. The data were normalized to β-actin mRNA to account for differences in reverse transcription efficiencies and the amount of template in the reaction mixtures. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistical significance of differences between groups was tested with Student’s t test. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered to be significant. * p ≤ 0.05 compared to non-diabetic controls, ** p ≤ 0.05 compared to diabetic subjects, n = 6, C = control, D = diabetic, 250 = 250 nM ET-traps, 500 = 500 nM ET-traps
ET-traps potently and significantly reduce the mRNA expression of fibronectin in the kidney of diabetic mice
There is a significant increase in kidney FN mRNA in diabetic mice compared to non-diabetic controls (Fig. 3). There was a significant reduction of kidney FN mRNA (close to control, non-diabetic) levels with a 500 nM dose of ET-traps, administered 3 times per week over the 8-week test period (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
ET-traps potently and significantly reduce the mRNA expression of fibronectin in the kidney of diabetic mice back, close to control, non-diabetic levels. Real time PCR analysis of fibronectin in the kidney. Fibronectin mRNA levels were significantly increased in the kidneys of diabetic mice at the end of the 8-week study period. This increase was significantly lower in subjects treated with 500 nM ET-traps. The data were normalized to β-actin mRNA to account for differences in reverse transcription efficiencies and the amount of template in the reaction mixtures. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistical significance of differences between groups was tested with Student’s t test. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered to be significant. * p ≤ 0.05 compared to non-diabetic controls, ** p ≤ 0.05 compared to diabetic subjects, n = 6, C = control, D = diabetic, 250 = 250 nM ET-traps, 500 = 500 nM ET-traps
There is a significant increase in urinary markers of pathology that is ameliorated in subjects treated with ET-traps
Measure of urine creatinine and albumin are standard markers of pathology in chronic diabetes. Indeed, in this study, we found a statistically significant increase in urinary albumin, creatinine and in the albumin to creatinine ratio in diabetic compared to control subjects (Fig. 4a–c). In all cases, there was a statistically significant reduction in all 3 markers of pathology with the 500 nM dose of ET-traps.
Fig. 4.
There is a significant increase in urinary markers of pathology that is ameliorated in subjects treated with ET-traps. a-c Protein expression analyses (ELISA) of urinary markers of pathology in B6 mouse subjects treated with or without ET-traps. Urine albumin, creatinine and the albumin to creatinine ratio were all significantly increased in the urine of diabetic mice at the end of the 8-week study period. This increase was absent in subjects treated with 500 nM ET-traps. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistical significance of differences between groups was tested with Student’s t test. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered to be significant. * p ≤ 0.05 compared to non-diabetic controls, ** p ≤ 0.05 compared to diabetic subjects, n = 6, C = control, D = diabetic, 250 = 250 nM ET-traps, 500 = 500 nM ET-traps
ET-traps have a positive effect on diabetic cardiomyopathy
We performed ultrasound, echocardiography studies to further evaluate the efficacy of ET-traps in ameliorating type I diabetes related pathology. Ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) were taken as measures of LV systolic function. Our ET-traps significantly return to basal levels EF and FS in diabetic mice (Fig. 5a, b).
Figs. 5 and 6.
ET-traps have a positive effect on diabetic cardiomyopathy. We performed ultrasound, echocardiography studies to determine EF, FS, and the E/A and E’/A’ ratios. There is a significant decline in all measure of cardio pathology in diabetic mice at the end of the 8-week study period. This decline was absent in subjects treated with 500 nM ET-traps, which exhibited a significant return to control, non-diabetic levels of all markers of cardio pathology. Statistical significance of differences between groups was tested with a Student's t-test or an ANOVA (Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference test). A p value of 0.05 or less was considered to be significant. . * p ≤ 0.05 compared to non-diabetic controls, ** p ≤ 0.05 compared to diabetic subjects, n = 6, C = control, D = diabetic, 250 = 250 nM ET-traps, 500 = 500 nM ET-traps
E/A and E’/A’ were taken as measures of LV diastolic dysfunction. The ET-traps significantly return to basal levels E/A and E’/A’ in diabetic mice (Fig. 6a, b).
Histological analyses of myocardium and glomerulus tissue further show the therapeutic benefit of ET-traps
Diabetes causes focal collagen deposition (green stain) in the myocardium, which was not seen in the control or in the ET-traps treated animals (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7.
Histological analyses of myocardium tissue show the therapeutic benefit of ET-traps. Diabetes causes focal collagen deposition (green stain) in the myocardium, which was not seen in the control or in the ET-traps treated animals, n = 6. Bar = 10 μm (same magnification for all micrographs of Fig. 7)
Diabetes causes mesangial expansion (magenta stain) in the glomerulus, which was not seen in the controls and was less in the ET-traps treated animals (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8.
Histological analyses of glomerulus tissue further show the therapeutic benefit of ET-traps. Diabetes causes mesangial expansion (magenta stain, arrow) in the glomerulus, which was not seen in the controls and was less in the ET-traps treated animals, n = 6. Bar = 10 μm (same magnification for all micrographs of Fig. 8)
Discussion
Various studies show a significant increase in ET-1 levels in diabetes compared to normal, control subjects [12, 13]. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic potential (using the B6 mouse model of type I diabetes) of ET-traps, which potently bind and sequester elevated levels of ET-1.
Earlier work shows increased collagen expression and deposition in diabetic hearts [7]. This is consistent with our findings, where we showed that administration of ET-traps returned Col 4α1 expression back to control, non-diabetic levels. Previous research has also reported that in Streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic mice, fibronectin mRNA levels were significantly increased compared to controls in the kidney cortex (p less than 0.02) [29]. Our results also showed that fibronectin mRNA levels were significantly increased in diabetic mice and this was ameliorated by ET-traps treatment. This again demonstrated the therapeutic benefit of ET-traps. Furthermore, histological analyses in our study showed increased collagen deposition in the myocardium of diabetic mice, which was not seen in the controls or in the ET-traps treated animals.
Cardiovascular diseases are a major cause of death and disability in people with diabetes, accounting for 44% of fatalities in people with type 1 diabetes [30, 31]. It has been suggested that aberrant ECM expression contributes to diabetic cardiomyopathy [32]. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a type of cardiovascular damage that is found in diabetic patients. It is characterized by myocardial dilation and hypertrophy as well as a decrease in the systolic and diastolic functions of the left ventricle [31].
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is an early sign of diabetic cardiomyopathy [33]. Mitral inflow patterns (E/A ratio) and mitral annulus velocities (E’/A’) were used to assess diastolic dysfunction, as reported previously [26]. E/A and the E’/A’ ratios were returned to basal levels with ET-traps treatment of diabetic mice. The diastolic dysfunction is the first abnormality, and with time, leads to systolic dysfunction [34]. In our study, we observed an improvement in EF and FS in the ET-traps treated diabetic mice.
Analogous to previous research that found increased albumin excreted in the urine in chronic diabetes [35], we observed a significant increase in urine albumin in diabetic mice. This was not seen with ET-traps treatment. Previous research also shows the importance of the identification of albuminuria levels, as well as increased serum creatinine and decreased haemoglobin levels to predict the development of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with diabetes and nephropathy [21]. Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) or ESRD in most developed countries [36]. This is a major problem, as shown by previous research; one study described that in the US alone, the costs for CKD patients older than 65 reached over $45 billion, which shows the economic burden associated with CKD. Patients with ESRD require lifelong dialysis and the only possible treatment is kidney transplant [37]. The results of our study indicate that ET-traps could help prevent progression to CKD and become a potential therapy for this.
Our results showed increased Col 4α1 and FN levels in the kidneys of diabetic mice. Previous work described the expression of extracellular matrix proteins in the kidney as a biomarker of CKD [37]. The urine albumin test or albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) is used to screen people with chronic conditions, such as diabetes and high blood pressure (hypertension) to test for the development of kidney disease. In our study, we found increased levels of creatinine and albumin in the urine of diabetic subjects. This was significantly reduced in diabetic mice treated with ET-traps, which further supports the use of ET-traps as a therapeutic tool for type 1 diabetes.
The advantage of our approach over ET antagonists is that we merely (potently) bind and sequester pathologically elevated levels of ET-1, without completely blocking ET-1 function that is essential and therefore, we do not see any side effects. Lowering the dosage of the antagonist (inhibitor drug) or the number of days administered per week, might help mitigate the side effects but a lower dose of the inhibitor drug may mean lower efficacy and therefore less symptom relief. Although this in vivo study looked specifically at type 1 diabetes, our previous in vitro work pertained to both type 1 and type 2 diabetes [10]. Hence, future work can also look at the benefits of our ET-traps in type 2 diabetes in vivo.
Conclusion
In summary, using a mouse model of diabetes, we found a significant therapeutic effect of the ET-traps on different markers of pathology, including ECM expression in the heart and kidneys, systolic function and diastolic dysfunction of the heart, and urine creatinine and albumin levels. Our results showed that ET-traps potently and significantly reduced each of these pathologic markers back to control, non-diabetic levels. Given these positive in vivo results and the fact that ET-traps did not exhibit any toxicology, ET-traps may become a new therapeutic tool for type 1 diabetes. Next steps would include further evaluating the use of ET-traps as a therapy for diabetes, including taking them through clinical trials.
Electronic supplementary material Please check captured Electronic supplementary material if correct.This heading should be on a single blue line like other headings. Please remove line spacing below. The Electronic Supplementary Materials were cited individually in the manuscript but corresponding data were presented as a compiled file. Should it is necessary to present these data individually as well, please provide replacement files that are already saved as separate files.Yes. Have re-uploaded all the supplementary figure files. And also the associated figure legends. Please add the relevant figure legends for the following:FigS1FigS2a, FigS2b, FigS2cFigS3a, FigS3bIt is ok to combine each supplementary figure eg, all the figures S2 can have the same figure legend. And all of supplementary figures S3 can have just the one figure legend.
(PDF 540 kb)
Abbreviations
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST
Aspartate transaminase
- CKD
Chronic kidney disease
- DTI
Doppler tissue imaging
- ET-1
Endothelin-1
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- ESRD
End-stage renal disease
- ETtr
Endothelin-1 traps
- FN
Fibronectin
- STZ
Streptozotocin
- T1D
Type 1 diabetes
Author contributions
AJ participated in the research design. The in vivo testing experiments were contracted out as stated at the beginning of the Materials and methods. AJ, AJ and VM contributed new reagents or analytic tools. AJ, VM, IJ and AJ wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Funding
This project was privately funded.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethics approval statement
All experiments conformed to the Guide For the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication no. 85–23, revised in 1996). Experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Western University council on animal care committee.
Conflict of interest
AJ, VM and AJ are members of Accelerate Cambridge, University of Cambridge, UK.
Declaration statement
Any inquiries on data of this study can be directed to Dr. Arjun Jain.
Footnotes
Key points
ET-traps have a very high binding affinity.
ET-traps significantly return different markers of pathology to basal levels (have a therapeutic effect) in an in vivo model of diabetes.
ET-traps are non-toxic.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Noble JA, Erlich HA. Genetics of type 1 diabetes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(1):a007732. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a007732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steck AK, Rewers MJ. Genetics of type 1 diabetes. Clin Chem. 2011;57(2):176–185. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.148221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Escher S, Sandholzer H. The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus. 2013;1–22.
- 4.Maahs DM, et al. Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2010;39(3):481–497. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fernandes JR, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas estimates of 2014 global health expenditures on diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;117(2016):48–54. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6.Melmed S, et. al. Williams textbook of endocrinology, 2011.
- 7.Law B, et al. Diabetes-induced alterations in the extracellular matrix and their impact on myocardial function. Microsc Microanal. 2012;18(1):22–34. doi: 10.1017/S1431927611012256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Evans T, et al. Endothelin receptor blockade prevents augmented extracellular matrix component mRNA expression and capillary basement membrane thickening in the retina of diabetic and galactose-fed rats. Diabetes. 2000;49(4):662–666. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.4.662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen S, et al. High glucose-induced, endothelin-dependent fibronectin synthesis is mediated via NF-kappa B and AP-1. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003;284(2):C263–C272. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00192.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jain A, et al. Endothelin-1 traps potently reduce pathologic markers back to basal levels in an in vitro model of diabetes. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Simonson MS, Ismail-Beigi F. Endothelin-1 increases collagen accumulation in renal mesangial cells by stimulating a chemokine and cytokine autocrine signaling loop. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(13):11003–11008. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.190793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seligman BG, et al. Increased plasma levels of endothelin 1 and von Willebrand factor in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(9):1395–1400. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schneider JG, et al. Elevated plasma endothelin-1 levels in diabetes mellitus. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15(11):967–972. doi: 10.1016/S0895-7061(02)03060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stehouwer CD, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and pathogenesis of diabetic angiopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;34(1):55–68. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(96)00272-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De Caterina R. Endothelial dysfunctions: common denominators in vascular disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2000;3(6):453–467. doi: 10.1097/00075197-200011000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deanfield J, et al. Endothelial function and dysfunction. Part I: methodological issues for assessment in the different vascular beds: a statement by the Working Group on Endothelin and Endothelial Factors of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2005;23(1):7–17. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200501000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bohm F, Pernow J. The importance of endothelin-1 for vascular dysfunction in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;76(1):8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.He, Z. Role of PKC[delta] and Endothelin-1 in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. In 66th Scientific Sessions 2006. American Diabetes Association.
- 19.Jun R, Chiming W. New sniper assignment for a celebrity-role of endothelin-1 in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Journal of Cardiothoracic - Renal Research. 2006;1(1):30–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jccr.2005.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seymour, T., What is diabetic nephropathy?, in Medical News Today. 2017.
- 21.A Shahriar, et al. Diabetic nephropathy, Pathophysiology and complications of diabetes mellitus; 2012.
- 22.Dabla PK. Renal function in diabetic nephropathy. World J Diabetes. 2010;1(2):48–56. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v1.i2.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Georgianos PI, Agarwal R. Endothelin a receptor antagonists in diabetic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2017;26(5):338–344. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen S, et al. miR-146a regulates glucose induced upregulation of inflammatory cytokines extracellular matrix proteins in the retina and kidney in diabetes. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thomas AA, Feng B, Chakrabarti S. ANRIL regulates production of extracellular matrix proteins and vasoactive factors in diabetic complications. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2018;314(3):E191–E200. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00268.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Feng B, et al. miR-146a mediates inflammatory changes and fibrosis in the heart in diabetes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2017;105:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen S, et al. Differential activation of NF-kappa B and AP-1 in increased fibronectin synthesis in target organs of diabetic complications. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;284(6):E1089–E1097. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00540.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wu Y, et al. ERK5 contributes to VEGF alteration in diabetic retinopathy. J Ophthalmol. 2010;2010:465824. doi: 10.1155/2010/465824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Roy S, et al. Overexpression of fibronectin induced by diabetes or high glucose: phenomenon with a memory; 1990;87(1):404–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Morrish NJ, et al. Mortality and causes of death in the WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes. Diabetologia. 2001;44(Suppl 2):S14–S21. doi: 10.1007/PL00002934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lip G, Hall J. Comprehensive hypertension. ScienceDirect. 2007.
- 32.Mishra PK, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: an Immunometabolic perspective. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017;8:72. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cosson S, Kevorkian JP. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: an early sign of diabetic cardiomyopathy? Diabetes Metab. 2003;29(5):455–466. doi: 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Slavica M, Biljana L. Contemporary echocardiographic techniques in early detection of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Journal of Cardiology and Current Research. 2014.
- 35.Townsend JC. Increased albumin excretion in diabetes. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43(1):3–8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kos I, Prkačin I. Diabetic nephropathy as a cause of chronic kidney disease. Acta Med Croatica. 2014;68(4–5):375–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Genovese F, et al. The extracellular matrix in the kidney: a source of novel non-invasive biomarkers of kidney fibrosis? Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2014;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-7-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(PDF 540 kb)







