Abstract
Therapeutic vertebral cement augmentation for the treatment of painful skeletal diseases, although widely applied for more than several decades, still has not thoroughly resolve the problem of cement extravasation. Based on a review of literature published, the present study was to provide a systematic review of the current understanding of pulmonary cement embolism (PCE) associated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), and to summarize the incidence, clinical features, prophylaxis and therapeutic management of PCE after vertebral cement reinforcement. The reported incidence of PCE ranges widely, from 2.1% to 26%. Asymptomatic PCE is a common condition without permanent clinical sequelae. Nevertheless, it is emergent once a symptomatic PCE is presented. Close attention and effective pre‐measures should be taken to avoid this catastrophic complication.
Keywords: Complication, Inferior vena cava, Percutaneous kyphoplasty, Percutaneous vertebroplasty, Pulmonary embolism
Introduction
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are both radiological, percutaneous puncture procedures, entailing bone cement injection into a destroyed vertebral body with the aim of pain relief and bone reinforcement of the vertebrae. Due to its minimal invasion and immediate pain relief, PVP/PKP is steadily gaining popularity in the treatment for painful tumor infiltration diseases such as aggressive haemangioma, metastatic carcinoma and multiple myeloma1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and for patients who have intractable pain due to osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. Despite the expanding utilities of these procedures, a growing number of reports about dreadful complications are documented in literature. Of particular concern is the bone cement leakage8, 12, 13. Cement escaping posteriorly into the spinal canal can cause spinal canal stenosis or cord compromise14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19; and cement escaping into the intervertebral foramina can lead to nerve root compression20, 21. Additionally, escaping cement in the perivertebral venous system and inferior vena cava (IVC)22, 23, 24, 25, 26 can drift down toward the right cardiac chambers or the pulmonary circulation with catastrophic results, such as cardiopulmonary failures23, 27, 28, impaired renal function23, 29, paradoxical cerebral embolism30, and even death13, 27, 31, 32, 33. In this paper, a comprehensive review to assess the rate, clinical features, pathophysiology, prophylaxis and management of cardiopulmonary cement efforts associated with PVP or PKP was performed.
Methods
Search Strategy
An experienced librarian performed a comprehensive literature search. Studies were searched through the electronic bibliographic databases of Springer‐Link, Ovid‐Medline and PubMed from January 1999 to December 2010. The following search terms were used: percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, complications and pulmonary embolism.
Study Selection
The search was limited to identifying studies published in English. Considering only a limited number or no randomized controlled trials were expected, also case reports or non‐randomized controlled and observational studies were included. In addition, the reference sections of all included full text studies were inspected to identify supplementary relevant studies. Two review authors independently scrutinized all titles and abstracts yielded for eligibility according to the following inclusion criteria: (i) Inclusion being made of case reports, experimental or observational designs; (ii) Studies had to pertain to the surgical intervention of PVP or PKP for the treatment of osteoporotic and/or tumorous origin; (iii) Studies were required to include quantitative information relating to at least one of the following primary interest variables: complications, cement leakage, pulmonary embolism, pathophysiology, manifestation and management; and (iv) Studies involving pulmonary emboli produced in hip arthroplasty or fat emboli associated with long bone fracture were excluded.
Data Extraction
In order to assess the rate, clinical features, pathophysiology, management and prophylaxis of pulmonary cement efforts associated with PVP or PKP, the results of all relevant statement were extracted from the original studies.
Results
Search and Selection
Of 721 relevant articles being screened in detail, 116 full text articles were retrieved. Reviewing the reference sections of all included full text studies resulted in seven additional references. After scrutinizing all 123 articles, a total of five observational studies34, 35, 36, 37, 38, three non‐randomized controlled experimental animal trials39, 40, 41 and 32 case reports22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 were indentified. No randomized controlled trial was identified. As a few of the papers were observational studies, methodological quality and meta‐analysis of the included studies was not assessed.
Outcome
Five observational studies consist of three retrospective studies34, 35, 36 and two prospective studies37, 38. Fifty‐one cases in all with cement pulmonary embolism were noted in the observational studies. Among these 51 cases, 50 cases were secondary to PVP and one case was following PKP. In the 32 case reports22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 35 patients (34 following PVP and 1 following PKP) were diagnosed with pulmonary cement embolism (PCE), 30 were symptomatic22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60 and five were asymptomatic22, 42, 48, 51, 59. The entire development of cement pulmonary embolism was presented, including the clinical manifestation, diagnostic methods, emergent management and outcome. Table 1 summarizes a description of the case reports of PCE. To date, five lethal cases of pulmonary embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty have been reported13, 27, 31, 32, 33 (Table 2).
Table 1.
Author/Publication date | Operation level and operation indication | Clinical manifestation | When manifestation presented/when PE was detected | Cement migration | Management | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tozzi et al.23 (2002) | T11 fracture (PVP) | Developed respiratory distress, renal failure, a mean pulmonary artery pressure of 48 mm Hg, right cardiac failure | At the end of the PVP procedure | Perivertebral venous system, IVC, both Pas | Noninvasive ventilatory support, inotropic agents, heparin, pulmonary embolectomy | Recovered from respiratory and cardiac failure |
Jang et al.48 (2002) | T6, T9, T10, T11, L1, L2 CF (PVP) | Chemical odor of solvent in the patient's mouth and nausea, mild dyspnea, chest discomfort | During cement injection | PA | Delayed injection, oxygen inhalation and anticoagulants | Dyspnea regressed |
Katrien et al.43 (2003) | T11 CF (PVP) | Mild dyspnea, reduced blood flow to the right lower lobe | 2 days after the procedure | Right PA | Intravenous heparin, catheter procedure and open‐heart operation, oral anticoagulant therapy | Uneventful recovery |
Bernhard et al.51 (2003) | T10, 11, L1 CFs (PVP) | Denied any respiratory symptoms | 6 months later | Both lungs | — | Discharged |
Kim et al.24 (2005) | T8 fracture (PVP) | Severe chest pain, hemopericardium, cardiac perforation | 7 days after the PVP | Azygous vein, RA and RV, PA | Open heart surgery for hemopericardium and cement removal | Discharged |
Seo et al.57 (2005) | L1, 2 CFs (PVP) | Palpable mass on the subareolar of the left chest wall | 2 years after the PVP | IVC, RA, right PA | Right atriotomy and inferior vena cavotomy | — |
Chung et al.29 (2006) | L1 CF (PVP) | Impaired renal function | During operation | Both renal vessels | Treated conservatively | Discharged with BUN to Cr returned to normal |
Freitag et al.49 (2006) | L1‐L5 OVCFs (PVP) | A sudden onset of arrhythmia, hypotension (BP, 65/30 mm Hg), oxygen desaturation (SpO2, 91%) | During cement injection | Left inferior lobe PA | Stopped injection, intravenous unfractionated high‐dose heparin, further observation in ICU | Discharged on oral anticoagulant |
Abdul et al.42 (2007) | T11, 12 OVCFs (PVP) | Dyspnea, chest pain, increased D‐dimers level, ventilation‐perfusion mismatch | 3 days after discharge | Paravertebral venous system, both lungs | Low‐molecular‐weight heparin, Enoxaparin and Anti‐Xa | Rapid resolution of dyspnea and chest pain |
Lim et al.25 (2007) | L2, 5 CF (PVP) | Mild dyspnea and edema lasting 4 weeks, ventilation‐perfusion mismatch | 5 years after the procedure | IVC, right hepatic vein, RA, left PA | Anticoagulation, open‐heart surgery for atrial thrombectomy | An uneventful recovery |
Lim et al.45 (2008) | T12, L1 CF (PVP) | Chest pain, dyspnea, cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion | 2 months after T12 PVP and 9 days after L1 PVP | Right upper lung and RV | Pericardial collection aspiration, cement removal, repair of right ventricular wall | Experienced no sequelae |
Son et al.26 (2008) | L1, 2, 4 CF (PVP) | Chest pain and tightness, hemopericardium, severe tricuspid regurgitation, cardiac tamponade | 5 days after the procedure | ICV, RV | Emergent operation for cement removal and suture of perforated right ventricle, tricuspid annuloplasty | Recovery without any complication and discharged |
Cadeddu et al.52 (2009) | T12, L2 OVCFs (PVP) | Asymptomatic | 2 years after the procedure | RA and RV, left PA | Right cardiac catheterism | Failed removal of cement |
Braiteh et al.44 (2009) | L3 CF (PVP) | Intermittent precordial chest pain and palpitation | 5 months after the operation | RA and RV | Endovascular procedure for foreign body retrieve | Symptoms relieved |
Caynak et al.46 (2009) | T4, 9 CF (PVP) | Progressive dyspnea, chest discomfort, hemodynamic unstability, cardiac tamponade by pericardial collection | 2 months after operation | Azygous veins, both PAs, RA and RV | Anticoagulation, pulmonary physiotherapy, emergent operation for hemorrhagic fluid drain and cement particles removal | Favorable outcome |
Radcliff et al.60 (2010) | L2 CF (PKP) | Shortness of breath symptoms with productive cough | 28 days after PKP | Right PA | Conservative management | Discharged with no further exacerbation |
BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CF, compression fracture; IVC, inferior vena cava; OVCF, osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; PA, pulmonary artery; PVP, percutaneous vertebroplasty; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.
Table 2.
Author/Cement type | Operation leve l and operation indication | Clinical manifestation | When manifestation presented/when PE was detected | Cement migration | Management | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chen et al.21/PMMA with tungsten | L2, L4 OVCFs | A sudden onset of bradycardia, hypotension (BP, 64/30 mm Hg), oxygen desaturation (SpO2, 70%) and hypocapnia, right heart outlet obstruction and failure | At the time of skin closure | RA, RV | Resuscitation for one hour (cardiac massage and intravenous injection of 10 mg epinephrine) | Died from bone cement implantation |
Yoo et al.27/PMMA with barium | L5 OVCF | Arthralgia, myalgia, fever, ARDS | 3 days after operation | Right interlobar PA | Supplemental oxygen via face mask, tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, intravenous infusion of heparin, pulmonary embolectomy | Died 20 days after PVP |
Monticelli et al.32/– | T12, L1, 2 fractures | Shock, low blood oxygenation and low pulmonary arterial pressure, cardiac arrest | Approximately 15 min after procedure | Paravertebral venous plexus, PAs | Extended cardiopulmonary resuscitation but failed, forensic autopsy | Died |
Stricker et al.31/PMMA | L1–4 OVCFs | Severe chest pain, Restless, tachypnea, tachycardia, hypertension, oxygen desaturation, loss of consciousness, pulseless electrical activity | During the last injection of PMMA | IVC, Right PA | Mask ventilation, positive pressure ventilation, repeated intravenous boluses of noradrenaline and adrenaline | Died |
Barragan et al.13/PMMA with tungsten | –Spinal metastases | Ventilatory and hemodynamic symptoms | — | — | Oral anticoagulants | Died 8 days after PVP |
ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CF, compression fracture; IVC, inferior vena cava; OVCF, osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; PA, pulmonary artery; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.
Rate of Pulmonary Cement Embolism Following PVP or PKP
The rate at which cement embolizes into the cardiopulmonary circulation during vertebral reinforcement is uncertain, as patients are not routinely screened with chest imaging before and after the procedure. This is especially true when the PCE is asymptomatic. In the five observational studies, rate of PCE following PVP/PKP was discussed (Table 3). As shown in the table, the observed incidence in prospective studies with stand postprocedual chest CT scan is much higher than that in retrospective studies. That is to say that the rate of cement pulmonary embolism would commonly be underestimated.
Table 3.
Clinical Features
Concerning the cases of symptomatic cardiopulmonary efforts cited above, common clinical features range from precordial chest pain and tightness24, 26, 44, 45, 46, 49, mild to severe dyspnea25, 43, 45, 46, 48, cyanosis, palpitation44, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)23, 27. Physical examination is remarkable for tachypnea, hypotension33, 46, 49, irregular cardiac rhythm32, 49 or cardiac arrest32. Laboratory value may show an increased plasma d‐dimer level25, 42, oxygen desaturation (low SpO2)32, 33, 49, hypocapnia33 and unstable pulmonary arterial pressure14, 32. Pulmonary ventilation perfusion scans show ventilation perfusion mismatch with reduced blood flow to the embolized lobe25, 43. Commonly, the vascular cement extravasation is not noticed during or immediately after the PVP/PKP procedure, resulting in a delay for the diagnosis and relevant management of pulmonary embolism24. Therefore, the role of chest radiography and other imaging methods in the diagnosis of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) pulmonary embolism has yet to be decided. (i) Chest radiography: The cement used is of such high density compared with the lung tissue, that the visualization of cement emboli on conventional chest radiograph is quite striking51. Some researchers conclude that the risk of pulmonary embolism of PMMA might be underestimated. Thus, a routine chest radiography was proposed following every vertebroplasty, in order to detect pulmonary PMMA embolism earlier and thereby prevent serious delayed cardiopulmonary failures27, 42, 48, 50. (ii) Echocardiography: Transesophageal echocardiography is a safe and non‐invasive modality to evaluate hemodynamic instability and to reveal echogenic linear material in the cardiac chambers52, 61. (iii) CT: Computerized tomographic angiography enables the locations, the lengths, and the number of pulmonary cement pieces to be clearly visualized45. Multidetector CT (MDCT) accurately shows the cement material in the cardiac chambers, which is not detected on echocardiograph24, 46, 57. (iv) Pulmonary angiography: Pulmonary angiography is a characteristic test for pulmonary embolism, which facilitates earlier diagnosis. Nevertheless, there is no report about pulmonary angiography being used for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, as it is costly, invasive and complicated.
Discussion
Following encouraging clinical outcome, particularly with respect to pain relief, indications for vertebral cement reinforcement were extended and comprise at present the palliative treatment of spinal tumor infiltration such as aggressive haemangioma, myeloma, metastatic osteolytic diseases, and more recently, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures as well. However, the result of our review shows that PVP/PKP is a high‐risk technique.
During the PVP procedure, bone cement (PMMA) leakage into the paravertebral or extradural venous plexus is a well‐described local complication when cement is injected into the vertebral body under high pressure via a small needle (11–13 gauge). Moreover, a needle inadvertently placed in the basivertebral vein or an overfilling of cement in the vertebral body can facilitate cement migration into the perivertebral venous plexus23, then through the hemiazygous vein, the azygous vein, and then the IVC. It is in these locations where polymerization of the cement embolus occur22, 23, 24.
If it is fluid or injected too quickly, bone cement may enter into the right atrium (RA) and right ventricle (RV) via IVC, and firmly stick to the RA/RV free wall, due to the material's long and stiff nature24, 26, 43, 44, 45, 46, 61. A right atrial thrombus occasionally obstructs blood flow through the tricuspid valve with the result of hemopericardium and severe tricuspid regurgitation24, 26, 44, and leading to cardiac tamponade or cardiac perforation26, 45, 46.
Infrequently, cement drifts down the blood stream toward the pulmonary arterial circulation and obstructs the orifice of the local lobar branch23, 27, 28, 34, 35, 37, 47, 48, 49. In an animal model trial41, calcium phosphate cement (CPC) was found to result in a more severe increase in pulmonary arterial pressure compared to PMMA, due to its disintegration property. The formation of anaphylactic toxins of PMMA may cause direct cellular injury by increasing cell permeability through releasing histamine and platelet‐activating factors, and by stimulating neutrophil adherence and superoxide production. Pulmonary cement emboli also lead to an increase of capillary permeability, ultimately predisposes dyspnea and even acute respiratory distress syndrome, causing similar pathophysiological consequences to other pulmonary embolisms27. On the other hand, bone is replaced by fat tissue in osteoporotic vertebral bodies, the percutaneous injection of acrylic bone cement may increase intramedullary pressure and thereby, contents of fat or bone marrow shift into the paravertebral venous circulation with a potential to contribute to the clinical presentation of pulmonary embolism33, 42. Based on the result of the experimental study, Krebs et al.39, 40 contended that cement embolus is not the sole factor in triggering the formation of pulmonary vessels occlusion.
Considering PCE predispose a great contribution of cardiopulmonary dysfunction, it is crucial to pay close attention and take effective premeasures to avoid this mortal complication.
Monitoring Equipment
Meticulous monitoring of the cement flow during the PVP or PKP procedure is critical. Uniplanar fluoroscopy is used commonly, which does help to detect the posterior vertebral leakage, but real‐time detection of cement from lateral vertebral leakage remains difficult owing to the overlap of the intravertebral cement. Biplanar fluoroscopy allows a simultaneous detection of the vertebrae in two projections and cement extravasation into the perivertebral veins or the spinal canal42. Braak et al.62 recently attempted to use real‐time 3‐dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy guidance in needle interventions. They testified that it is a new, promising, and feasible technique providing high accuracy. Nevertheless, fluoroscopic visualization is usually obscured by shoulders in the lateral projection in the cervical and high thoracic areas. Bayley et al.63 recently shared a modified but simple position that significantly improves the fluoroscopic lateral imaging of the upper thoracic spine. They had accessed vertebrae between T1 and T5 successfully with this technique, and confirmed that it is a safe practice of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty and biopsy throughout the upper thoracic spine23. Computed tomography becomes very effective by ensuring an accurate puncture and by allowing easy real‐time monitoring of the cement injection, even in the high spinal level64, 65. The disadvantage is plane‐limited registration, which may lead to cement leakage being undetected between slices42.
Opinions differ regarding the utility of venography in decreasing cement extrusion during PVP. Some authors45, 48, 66 recommended an antecedent vertebral venography to identify a direct shunt from the needle tip to the venous plexus. The opposite viewpoint contends that venography does not exactly predict venous leakage, due to the differences in the viscosity and flow characteristics of the contrast material and cement67, 68, 69. Additionally, the opacification of the contrast agent could hinder visualization for cement injection. This obstacle is exemplified during an injection into necrotic cavities in cases of vertebral osteonecrosis or Kümmell's disease, or during an injection through the endplates to the intervertebral discs70. Do71 pointed out that venography help novice or inexperienced operators to perform vertebroplasty in a safer manner, but for those who are adept at the performance of vertebroplasty, venography may represent a superfluous step.
Bone Cement Substitutes
Polymethylmethacrylate currently represents the standard in augmentation materials12. The mixing of PMMA with barium or tungsten quantity to 30% by weight for opacification is essential for good visualization of extraosseous cement leakage and for timely discontinuation of the cement injection72. Owing to its nondegradable and toxic property, however, attempts have been increasingly made in recent years to explore the alternative biomaterials that are more suited for PVP and PKP73, 74, 75. Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) and polypropylene fumarate (PPF) are now being investigated as prospective alternatives for vertebral augmentation due to the cytocompatibility and osteoconductive behavior74, 75, but it seems that the no alternative bone cements could deny any extrusion for their native injectable aspect. Preclinical studies demonstrated that high‐viscosity cements significantly decrease the incidence of leakage compared with low‐viscosity cements. In Georgy's study76, he introduced new high‐viscosity cement (Confidence spinal cement system) used for vertebroplasty. The result confirmed prior observations that the high‐viscosity confidence cement results in a leakage rate comparable with that of kyphoplasty.
Cement Injection Techniques and Cement Delivery System
As a new technique, percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty is taking over the role of PVP8. Multiple literature sources agree that the risk of cement extravasation in PKP is reduced because the inflated balloon creates a void within the vertebral body, into which cement is injected under low pressure16, 50, 76, 77, 78. Vertebral body with cavity facilitates injection under low pressure because cement usually seeks the potential space preferentially63. As shown in previous studies34, 37, 79, a higher frequency of vascular cement seepage was noted in cases of vertebral body without cavity. On the other hand, injecting the cement in stages may be a good strategy to avoid a relevant extravasation42, 80. Try to inject a small volume of PMMA, and then stop the injection, even if leakage is not detected, and proceed with the augmentation about 20 to 30 s later when the endangered veins are occluded. Any injection should be delayed immediately as long as venous leakage is detected under monitoring images42.
Vesselplasty is another advanced device for cement injection81. Instead of using a balloon to create a cavity, this procedure uses a polyethylene terephthalate (PTE) artificial container (Vessel‐X, A‐Spine Holding Group Corporation) for restoring the height of the vertebral body and for containing the bone void material. Container is introduced into the vertebra in its reduced configuration and, once positioned within the vertebra, is expanded simultaneously by the injection of PMMA. Then, owing to the porous structure comprising the fibers of the PET vessel, a small amount of bone cement permeates through its wall and interdigitates within the vertebral body to increase its stability. At the end of the procedure, vessel and the bone void filler material can be left behind at the predetermined injection area. Theoretically, this new technology may effectively avoid the problem of cement leaking into the cardiopulmonary circulatory system. Catheter fabric kyphoplasty (CFK)82 is the latest breakthrough cement delivery system in which an expander made up of fabric was left behind in the vertebra until the cement solidified. It serves as an external coat that would thoroughly prevent cement migrating into the adjacent tissues. Unlike the Vessel‐X procedure, fabric expander can be removed after cement consolidated. The results of the preliminary trials prove that Vesselplasty and CFK offer statistically significant benefits in the improvement of pain, mobility, and cement seepage81, 82.
Therapeutic Management
Therapeutic management of pulmonary cement embolism depends on the clinical presentation of the patient42. Choes et al.34 contended that the incidental finding of cement emboli in an asymptomatic patient should not alter medical treatment. In Venmans’ study36, all 11 patients with venous PMMA migration toward the lungs remained asymptomatic during 1‐year follow‐up. Repeat CT scanning after 1 year demonstrated unchanged pulmonary PMMA deposits without late reactive changes. This finding coincided with the notion that plugging a small percentage of arterial pulmonary vessels does not result in any respiratory symptoms51. Yoo et al.27 proposed that a conservative treatment rather than a surgical removal may be recommended except when the obstruction is extensive enough to cause immediate cardiopulmonary changes. There are cases of severe pulmonary cement embolism following PVP presented in the English literature. In 1999, Padovin et al.47 first described a case of symptomatic pulmonary embolism in a 41‐year‐old patient with Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis (LCH). Symptoms of right chest pain, tachypnea, tachycardia, and hemoptysis arose immediately after PVP, and supplemental oxygen, anticoagulation and anticonvulsion produced a good result. Zaccheo et al.28 reported a 77‐year‐old woman developed acute respiratory failure after multilevel percutaneous vertebroplasty. Mechanical ventilatory support and anticoagulation with low‐molecular‐weight heparin and warfarin enabled a recovery from pulmonary embolism. Concerning the management of semiotic PCE in case reports, we generalized an emergency treatment principle that if the patient presents with sudden dyspnea, and multiparameter monitor demonstrates hypotension, arrhythmia, and oxygen desaturation, any cement injection should be terminated and the patient should be immediately returned to a supine position33, 49. Supplemental oxygen23, 27, 48 can be administered via facemask to maintain Pa O2 >60 mm Hg and Sa O2 >90%, a tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation is to be performed if there is no improvement27. Since the presence of intravascular acrylic material leads to the activation of the coagulation system, therapy with anticoagulation such as low‐molecular‐weight heparin should be administered immediately to reduce the danger of pulmonary infarction progression in the absence of contraindications23, 42, 48, 49. In cases with saddle cement emboli at the cardiac chambers causing multiple cardiac perforations26, 45 or right heart failure23, 26, 46, or at the pulmonary artery levels causing immediate respiratory distress27, conservative treatments may fail to yield a good result. Emergent surgical intervention such as catheterism via femoral vein approach, open embolectomy from cardiopulmonary circulation or a hybrid technique combining an interventional catheter procedure with an open heart operation can be scheduled to remove the foreign acrylic cement22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 43, 45, 52.
Given that all the related studies have suggested that intracardiac thrombus and pulmonary thromboembolism can occur as a late complication due to bone cement seepage, interest in discovering new cement alternatives and advanced injection device, seems urgent.
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest. No benefits in any form have been, or will be, received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
References
- 1. Bosnjaković P, Ristić S, Mrvić M, et al Management of painful spinal lesions caused by multiple myeloma using percutaneous acrylic cement injection. Acta Chir Lugosl, 2009, 56: 153–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dalbayrak S, Onen MR, Yilmaz M, et al Clinical and radiographic results of balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral body metastases and multiple myelomas. J Clin Neurosci, 2010, 17: 219–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mazumdar A, Gilula LA. Relief of radicular pain in metastatic disease by vertebroplasty. Acta Radiol, 2010, 51: 179–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sandri A, Carbognin G, Regis D, et al Combined radiofrequency and kyphoplasty in painful osteolytic metastases to vertebral bodies. Radiol Med, 2010, 115: 261–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Saliou G, Kocheida M, Lehmann P, et al Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain management in malignant fractures of the spine with epidural involvement. Radiology, 2010, 254: 882–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Yang H, Wang G, Liu J, et al Balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture nonunion. Orthopedics, 2010, 33: 24–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gan M, Yang H, Zhou F, et al Kyphoplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures. Orthopedics, 2010, 33: 88–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Fuentes S, Blondel B. Vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. Neurochirurgie, 2010, 56: 8–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Blondel B, Fuentes S, Metellus P, et al Severe thoracolumbar osteoporotic burst fractures: treatment combining open kyphoplasty and short‐segment fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2009, 95: 359–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rousing R, Hansen KL, Andersen MO, et al Twelve‐months follow‐up in forty‐nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35: 478–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Marco RA, Meyer BC, Kushwaha VP. Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with posterior decompression and pedicle screw instrumentation supplemented with balloon‐assisted vertebroplasty and calcium phosphate reconstruction. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92 (Suppl. 1 Pt 1): 67–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jaeblon T. Polymethylmethacrylate: properties and contemporary uses in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2010, 18: 297–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Barragán‐Campos HM, Vallée JN, Lo D, et al Percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases: complications. Radiology, 2006, 238: 354–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Teng MM, Cheng H, Ho DM, et al Intraspinal leakage of bone cement after vertebroplasty: a report of 3 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2006, 27: 224–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Harrington KD. Major neurological complications following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83: 1070–1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Röllinghoff M, Siewe J, Zarghooni K, et al Effectiveness, security and height restoration on fresh compression fractures—a comparative prospective study of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2009, 52: 233–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tsai YD, Liliang PC, Chen HJ. Anterior spinal artery syndrome following vertebroplasty: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35: E134–E136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Becker S, Meissner J, Tuschel A, et al Cement leakage into the posterior spinal canal during balloon kyphoplasty: a case report. J Orthop Surg, 2007, 15: 222–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sabuncuoğlu H, Dinçer D, Güçlü B, et al Intradural cement leakage: a rare complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2008, 150: 811–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Alvarez L, Pérez‐Higueras A, Quiñones D, et al Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors: postprocedural outcome and quality of life. Eur Spine J, 2003, 12: 356–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chen LH, Niu CC, Yu SW, et al Minimally invasive treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Chang Gung Med J, 2004, 27: 261–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Athreya S, Mathias N, Rogers P, et al Retrieval of cement embolus from inferior vena cava after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2009, 32: 817–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Tozzi P, Abdelmoumene Y, Corno AF, et al Management of pulmonary embolism during acrylic vertebroplasty. Ann Thorac Surg, 2002, 74: 1706–1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kim SY, Seo JB, Do KH, et al Cardiac perforation caused by acrylic cement: a rare complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 185: 1245–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lim KJ, Yoon SZ, Jeon YS, et al An intraatrial thrombus and pulmonary thromboembolism as a late complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Anesth Analg, 2007, 104: 924–926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Son KH, Chung JH, Sun K, et al Cardiac perforation and tricuspid regurgitation as a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2008, 33: 508–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yoo KY, Jeong SW, Yoon W, et al Acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with pulmonary cement embolism following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29: 294–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zaccheo MV, Rowane JE, Costello EM. Acute respiratory failure associated with polymethyl methacrylate pulmonary emboli after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Emerg Med, 2008, 26: 636.e5–636.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chung SE, Lee SH, Kim TH, et al Renal cement embolism during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Eur Spine J, 2006, 15: 590–594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Scroop R, Eskridge J, Britz GW. Paradoxical cerebral arterial embolization of cement during intraoperative vertebroplasty: case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002, 23: 868–870. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 31. Stricker K, Orler R, Yen K, et al Severe hypercapnia due to pulmonary embolism of polymethylmethacrylate during vertebroplasty. Anesth Analg, 2004, 98: 1184–1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Monticelli F, Meyer HJ, Tutsch BE. Fatal pulmonary cement embolism following percutaneous vertebroplasty. Forensic Sci Int, 2005, 149: 35–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chen HL, Wong CS, Ho ST, et al A lethal pulmonary embolism during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Anesth Analg, 2002, 95: 1060–1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Choe DH, Marom EM, Ahrar K, et al Pulmonary embolism of polymethyl methacrylate during percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 183: 1097–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Duran C, Sirvanci M, Aydogan M, et al Pulmonary cement embolism: a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Acta Radiol, 2007, 48: 854–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Venmans A, Lohle PN, Van Rooij WJ, et al Frequency and outcome of pulmonary polymethylmethacrylate embolism during percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2008, 29: 1983–1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kim YJ, Lee JW, Park KW, et al Pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: incidence, characteristics, and risk factors. Radiology, 2009, 251: 250–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Venmans A, Klazen CA, Lohle PN, et al Percutaneous vertebroplasty and pulmonary cement embolism: results from VERTOS II. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010, 31: 1451–1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Aebli N, Krebs J, Davis G, et al Fat embolism and acute hypotension during vertebroplasty: an experimental study in sheep. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2002, 27: 460–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Hoerstrup SP, et al Influence of bone marrow fat embolism on coagulation activation in an ovine model of vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90: 349–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Krebs J, Aebli N, Goss BG, et al Cardiovascular changes after pulmonary embolism from injecting calcium phosphate cement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2007, 82: 526–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Abdul JY, Bartels J, Alberti O, et al Delayed presentation of pulmonary polymethylmethacrylate emboli after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32: 589–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Katrien F, Yves T, Bart P, et al Successful management of a large pulmonary cement embolus after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a case report. Spine Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28: 424–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Braiteh F, Row M. Right ventricular acrylic cement embolism: late complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Heart, 2009, 95: 275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lim SH, Kim H, Kim HK, et al Multiple cardiac perforations and pulmonary embolism caused by cement leakage after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2008, 33: 510–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Caynak B, Onan B, Sagbas E, et al Cardiac tamponade and pulmonary embolism as a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 87: 299–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Padovani B, Kasriel O, Brunner P, et al Pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: a rare complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1999, 20: 375–377. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Jang JS, Lee SH, Jung SK. Pulmonary embolism of polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a report of three cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2002, 27: E416–E418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Freitag M, Gottschalk A, Schuster M, et al Pulmonary embolism caused by polymethylmethacrylate during percutaneous vertebroplasty in orthopaedic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2006, 50: 248–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, et al Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31: 1983–2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Bernhard J, Heini PF, Villiger PM. Asymptomatic diffuse pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: an unusual complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis, 2003, 62: 85–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Cadeddu C, Nocco S, Secci E, et al Echocardiographic accidental finding of asymptomatic cardiac and pulmonary embolism caused by cement leakage after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2009, 10: 590–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Bonardel G, Pouit B, Gontier E, et al Pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a rare and nonthrombotic cause of pulmonary embolism. Clin Nucl Med, 2007, 32: 603–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Baumann A, Tauss J, Baumann G, et al Cement embolization into the vena cava and pulmonal arteries after vertebroplasty: interdisciplinary management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2006, 31: 558–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Coche E. Cement pulmonary embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty. JBR–BTR, 2007, 90: 138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Harris B, Briggs G, Dennis C. Cement pulmonary embolism as a consequence of vertebroplasty. Intern Med J, 2007, 37: 196–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Seo JS, Kim YJ, Choi BW, et al MDCT of pulmonary embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184: 1364–1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Righini M, Sekoranja L, Le Gal G, et al Pulmonary cement embolism after vertebroplasty. Thromb Haemost, 2006, 95: 388–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. MacTaggart JN, Pipinos II, Johanning JM, et al Acrylic cement pulmonary embolus masquerading as an embolized central venous catheter fragment. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 43: 180–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Radcliff KE, Reitman CA, Delasotta LA, et al Pulmonary cement embolization after kyphoplasty: a case report and review of the literature. Spine J, 2010, 10: E1–E5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Lee JS, Jeong YS, Ahn SG. Intracardiac bone cement embolism. Heart, 2010, 96: 387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Braak SJ, Van Strijen MJ, Van LM, et al Real‐Time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy, and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194: 445–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Bayley E, Clamp J, Boszczyk BM. Percutaneous approach to the upper thoracic spine: optimal patient positioning. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18: 1986–1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. John MM. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: complication avoidance and technique optimization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003, 24: 1697–1706. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Michael BP, Sascha H, Ulrike K, et al CT‐guided vertebroplasty: analysis of technical results, extrasseous cement leakages, and complications in 500 procedures. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18: 2568–2578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, et al Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspect. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1997, 18: 1897–1904. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, et al Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology, 1996, 199: 241–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Gangi A, Kastler BA, Dietemann JL. Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1994, 15: 83–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Mathis JM, Barr JD, Belkoff SM, et al Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2001, 22: 373–381. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, et al Long‐term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology, 2000, 39: 1410–1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Do HM. Intraosseous venography during percutaneous vertebroplasty: is it needed? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002, 23: 508–509. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Simon GJ, Casey L, White G. Pulmonary cement embolism following percutaneous vertebroplasty. Chest Meeting Abstracts 2004, 126: 956. [Google Scholar]
- 73. Lewis G, Towler MR, Boyd D, et al Evaluation of two novel aluminum‐free, zinc‐based glass polyalkenoate cements as alternatives to PMMA bone cement for use in vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. J Mater Sci Med, 2010, 21: 59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Kim C, Mahar A, Perry A, et al Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007, 20: 604–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Blattert TR, Jestaedt L, Weckbach A. Suitability of a calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral body fracture augmentation: a controlled, randomized, clinical trial of balloon kyphoplasty comparing calcium phosphate versus polymethylmethacrylate. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34: 108–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Georgy BA. Clinical experience with high‐viscosity cements for percutaneous vertebral body augmentation: occurrence, degree, and location of cement leakage compared with kyphoplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010, 31: 504–508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Biscević M, Hamzaoglu A, Ljuca F, et al Minimally invasive surgery of pathologic spine fractures—vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty at Department for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo. Med Arh, 2009, 63: 234–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Katonis PG, et al Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and osteolytic tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005, 87: 1595–1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Komemushi A, et al Cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures with or without intravertebral clefts. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193: 442–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Wu ZX, Wei L, Hu YY, et al Staged‐injection procedure to prevent cement leakage during vertebroplasty: an in vitro study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32: 2437–2442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Flors L, Lonjedo E, Leiva SC, et al Vesselplasty: a new technical approach to treat symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193: 218–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Yang HL, Yuan HA, Wang GL, et al Primary clinical efficacy of catheter fabric kyphoplasty. Zhonghua Chuang Shang Gu Ke Za Zhi, 2010, 12: 105–108. [Google Scholar]